Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

28,910 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

flat women are my kryptonite
0:57

Sensitive content

flat women are my kryptonite

Cunny News Network

42,054 views • 1 year ago

📌 A MESSAGE TO DEMOCRATS Nobody in America is more of a political prisoner than a black person. And the warden, or master, is a democrat. Please let my people go. A black person is not even allowed to speak against the democratic party without serious repercussions. Doing so makes you persona non grata. Colleagues, friends, and family distance themselves from you, not because they disagree but because they don't want democrats to catch them thinking freely. Because democrats have the power to strip you of your livelihood. Let my people go. Black people suffer from a psychological condition called vicarious punishment. Vicarious punishment is a form of observational or social learning in which an observer decreases or avoids certain behavior after watching someone else receive negative consequences for it. You can find plenty of examples of this during slavery. It seems not much has changed. Let my people go. Black people are some of the strongest people I know. But the democratic party is their kryptonite. We are some of the most outspoken people you will find anywhere on the planet. But when that democrat enters the room, we become mimes. When have you ever known a black person to suppress their own speech? Let my people go. Even if black people do disagree with you, it is because they have been subverted. Nuanced discussion has been disabled. Because black people also suffer from ideological subversion. This is when an external force undermines a group, society, or nation not primarily through direct attack, but by infiltrating, corrupting, or weaponizing its own institutions, culture, values, and people—turning them against their own collective interests, traditions, or survival. The truth is, the destruction of black community has been automated, with black intelligentsia writing the program updates. We may have had our physical bodies freed, but our minds are still shackled. Let my people go. I must admit that we will never overcome this. I must accept that we have been consumed and assimilated so deeply that we will never be politically free. The only thing left to do is let things run their course and watch everything burn. The democratic stronghold over our universities is too deeply entrenched to ever break free. Our most powerful force, black women, have been subverted so deeply that they will hate their own kind for not voting the right way. Like a bad horror movie, black women have become possessed. Let my people go. The HBCUs are our immediate enemies. The boule and black fraternities are our immediate enemies. They are nothing more than breeding grounds for democrat operatives and overseers. And what hurts me most is that the only way to freedom is through ourselves. The only thing that can free us is a black civil war. But I don't think we'll survive that. So, I plead. Let my people go. Not even money can free black people. Details emerged about Chili of TLC supporting the republican party and now she has to issue a public apology. For what? For thinking independently? For putting her money with her interests? Or because the democrats are ready to black list and take from her everything that she's worked for? Or is it for being a free negro? Let my people go.

Hotep Jesus

36,044 views • 3 months ago

My conversation with Shyam Sankar (Shyam Sankar). Shyam has spent nearly 20 years as the most important person at Palantir that most people have never heard of. We spend a lot of time understanding his worldview, which helps explain why he has devoted his life to this work. At the center of it is a belief in the primacy of people -- all meaningful change comes from a small number of builders willing to be heretics first. You will find few people who think as deeply about the relationship between technology and national power. In many ways, he is becoming the modern version of the heretics he most admires. We discuss: - What Alex Karp taught him about identifying superpowers and unlocking talent - Heretics + the components of American greatness - The origins of the FDE model - Ontology and chips – where value will accrue in AI - Why dual-use companies are the future of American industry - China and what it would take for the US to reindustrialize - His journey from Nigeria to Orlando and what his dad taught him about gratitude Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 2:23 Defining Heretics in US Military History 8:36 Shyam’s Personal Disagreeableness 9:49 Formative Experiences & Worldview 12:52 What Makes America Exceptional 14:48 What Does Greatness Mean? 15:33 Alex Karp 16:46 How to Unlock Talent 19:21 Identifying Superpowers and Kryptonite 22:54 The Gamma Ray Moment 25:00 Palantir's Next 10 Years 27:03 Forward Deployed Engineering 33:40 Explaining What Palantir Is 37:50 Military vs. Commercial Customers 39:00 The State of the US Military Today 47:01 How to Re-Industrialize America 51:06 Perspective on China as an Adversary 56:17 How to Get More Heretics in Government 1:03:53 Managing Rapid Pivots & Momentum 1:08:48 Where Will AI Value Accrue? 1:13:33 Reasserting the Legitimacy of Institutions 1:15:54 To Do or To Be? 1:16:31 Reflecting on Fatherhood 1:17:34 Kindest Thing

Patrick OShaughnessy

421,876 views • 4 months ago

⛔️🏳️‍⚧️ Trans’ GREATEST Weakness 🏳️‍⚧️⛔️ ———————- Okay, everyone, let’s see why trans people screech like demented hyenas when you ask, “WHAT IS A WOMAN?” They call the question irrelevant, nonsensical, and they think that they can wave it off with shouting, bullying and accusing everyone of transphobia and bigotry, but, why does it bug them? Because it forces them to face reality, not their fantasy. It exposes their “identity” belief as a lie, and, If it’s so meaningless, why do they lose their minds defending it? Their reason: “I feel like a woman, so I’m a real one,” as if emotions trump facts. That’s moronic, feeling like a pilot doesn’t let you fly a plane. Their “gender identity” is a fairy tale, if it’s all vibes, why do 80% of trans women keep their junk, per a 2023 UCLA study? When you ask them: “What does feeling like a woman means or entails?” they spew drivel like: “It’s an inner vibe,” or “It’s not about genitals, it’s my identity” or “Womanhood is who I am, not my body” Or “My body’s wrong,” or just other gibberish. That’s ONLY stereotypes, feelings or dysphoria, NOT A DEFINITION. They claim it’s a “social construct,” or “biology’s too complex,” citing intersex cases. But that is just cum-farts, because, intersex is 0.02-1.7% of people, per 2023 medical data, it doesn’t erase the 99.98% male-female binary. Moreover, their 2018 Nature brain scans, claiming trans brains mimic women’s are shaky studies show no proof feelings override DNA, just wishful thinking from tiny samples. They say we’re “evolving” to accept men as women, women as men, like biology’s a suggestion. What a crock, evolution doesn’t rewrite DNA because of your skirt fetish, you’re not rewriting humanity, you’re just loud about it. Meanwhile, those biologically born women who support trans nonsense are pathetic, spineless sellouts, drunk on woke clout, sob stories, ditching reason. Their “be kind, accept identity” line’s a joke, kindness doesn’t rewrite science, you’re enabling a delusion that erases your own biology, wake up, morons. If trans people answer to “what is a woman?” is how you feel and what you identify with, fine, believe that, but they don’t get to shove it down everyone’s throats, bully, attack, insult anyone who disagrees, misgenders, skips their pronouns, flinging “bigot,” “transphobia” like herpes at a frat party. Disagreement isn’t bigotry, people don’t want trans folks to stop existing, no, in Western society you can be whoever you want. But it’s a tyranny of the trans community, about 1% of the population, demanding we change our values, language and set of beliefs just so that they can fit in. When, in reality, they should respect our boundaries, stay away from kids, you’re not co-parents, stay out of women’s bathrooms, sports. Live your life, but don’t force us to agree, don’t call us bigots for saying no. Their “womanhood” is a logical shipwreck, built on feelings, cliches, intimidation. Science doesn’t bow to pronoun fits. A woman’s an adult human female, XX chromosomes, ovaries, uterus, that’s the fact they can’t escape. So, keep sobbing, trans clowns, your scam’s a joke, this question’s your kryptonite.

The Gay Ali Baba Show

72,561 views • 1 year ago

I'm the biggest loser in Caroline's BC leadership race. Why? Because of my spread: I had nothing to gain & everything to lose. Everyone else, had an upside: Kory Teneycke gets paid, just like he does now with this relationships with the Ford government. But me? Nobody pays me. I don't monetize relationships. I don't need anyone in government to make a living. I'm good. I took on a lot of hate. Threats. Lost a lot of avid followers & yet, I continued to double & triple down for Caroline. The reason I'm telling you this now, is because I'm coming at this from a purely neutral standpoint: When Pierre welcomed "the next Premier of BC who defeated the lobbyists from out east" I TOOK ZERO OFFENCE. Why? Because it was true. He was talking about Kory Teneycke. Doug Ford's campaign manager. The guy who attacked Pierre through the entire last election and hasn't stopped since. Here are the receipts nobody wants to mention: Caroline had the dream team. Kory ran the campaign. She raised over $1.5 million. The most ever in a BC leadership race. KLF lost her campaign manager mid-race. It was her, her husband, and volunteers. She raised a fraction of Caroline's number. AND SHE WON. But it wasn't a defeat of Caroline. It was a defeat of Kory Teneycke & a decisive “NO” to his involvement. Don’t believe me? Read the comments on the very last video I made supporting Caroline across my channels. This is the same Kory who registered a company for the sole purpose of removing Andrew Scheer as leader of the Conservative Party. Now, in this CTV interview, I think he's referring to me as an "online troll". But he didn't mind "the troll" when I was helping Caroline and HE could monetize the win. Here's the part that should concern every Conservative: Caroline posts a video. Within hours, CTV runs a coordinated hit piece on Pierre AND has Kory ready an interview about it. How exactly does that timeline happen without pre-coordination? Kory constantly appears on CTV. CTV pays him. THE SAME DAY, WITHIN HOURS, another member of Kory’s team publishes a second hit piece. Here’s the simple truth: you cannot demand Pierre "grow the tent" for the man aiming a political gun at his head every chance he gets. Especially when Pierre is telling the truth! And frankly, I think Pierre is too kind about it. I would be significantly more harsh to that traitor & fake Conservative Kory. I think he's only backs a "Conservative" when he can monetize the relationship. Here's the reality: Pierre is going nowhere. And for the record, I think Kory is Conservative kryptonite & anyone who hires him to run a campaign, is asking to lose. Also, 99% of the population doesn’t care about the hit piece nor does it do anything to Pierre’s polling. Canadians can’t afford to eat - they don’t care about a loser lobbyist.

Mario Zelaya

51,184 views • 16 days ago

I'm convinced that CNN actually stands for “Condescending News Network.” They are unnecessarily snarky & demeaning when they engage in debate because they really believe they're the smartest people in every room. Their crap attitudes are a result of catering to the elitist left, carving out an even more dogmatic niche audience than in previous years. The people they bring onto their panels and hire as contributors are so abrasively condescending that it's like second nature for them to hit you with a rude quip for the sake of exuding their self-perceived dominance over anyone who dares to challenge their egotism. Their high self-regard makes them equally loud and oblivious to how foolish they appear to outsiders when they are wrong. In a recent appearance, "Journalist" Toure, in a classic snobbish manner, repeatedly laced Scott Jennings with unnecessary condescending remarks. Classic one-liners like "Do I need to give you a civics lesson?" and "At some near point, this conversation is going to look very silly to you." Meanwhile, in typical deranged fashion, Toure is implying that Trump will put someone in charge of the military to do Trump's bidding...when Trump is already in charge of the military as the commander-in-chief. Speaking of unlikable snobs, CNN routinely features Washington Post's Catherine Rampell on roundtables to visually demonstrate her contempt for anyone disagreeing with her. My favorite moment was when she was sitting next to a successful businessman, Kevin O'Leary, and she's constantly interrupts him to tell him how business really works. Granted, she is a former associate economics professor and likely knows more than I do about economics. However, only a fool would think they know more about a given topic than a person who lives it day in and day out. It's like thinking that the sports announcer knows more about basketball than an NBA player. The icing on the cake is CNN anchor Jake Tapper coming out with a new book focused on the cognitive decline of Joe Biden during his administration when he made it a point to snide Lara Trump for saying the most obvious. The true irony is that Tappers' book is about how people weren’t allowed to talk about his mental decline, yet he was part of this enforcement. It's like the getaway driver complaining about the prevalence of bank robberies. So, I'm not being misunderstood: I have no problem with debates and passionate discussions surrounding politics and news. For me, it's not about a particular side and defending someone because of personal bias. I'm focusing on the decorum, or lack thereof, that exists in the mainstream media atmosphere. Since 2020, my political worldview has been molded by rejecting outright snobbery coming from the media and politicians alike. Part of the reason I started contributing to publications like the New York Post and Newsweek was because of how elitists in the media give bad faith interpretations about how Americans see the world. In other words, outlets like CNN have turned into an unlikable network and with every passing day, they repel viewers like they're broadcasting kryptonite. It's not just that their hosts and panelists have contempt for the people sitting across from them, but that air of disdain transmits through the cameras as well. It took me a while to contemplate why people still watch CNN, regardless of if you're on the political left or right. For some, it's the habit of watching legacy media that is difficult to quit. However, I believe the real audience they're catering to is the classical elitist who is familiar with speaking to people "below" them with an unabashed, condescending attitude. The reason most Americans are turning off the mainstream media for their information is because they've realized that the message coming across isn't for them anymore. It's for a class of Americans that enjoys being argumentative and ridiculing anyone they feel isn't on their level. This attitude is a massive turn off for most Americans. We get nothing from watching six to eight people yell over each other and laughing in the face of someone who has an opposing viewpoint. Normal people don't engage in this type of in-person demonizing and have a healthy amount of humility. The people on these networks aren't normal though, which is why they look alien to us. With the average CNN viewer being 67 addition to their lack of self-reflection, makes it inevitable that this legacy network will be put out to pasture. But don't worry, they'll blame us for their downfall. Accountability isn't the media's forte after all.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

177,412 views • 1 year ago