My mind is blown 🤯

Who the person started this comparison of Jesus with Muhammad in the first place? Didn't they know that Jesus is God and Muhammad was a mere mortal who led the greatest deceit of all times in the name of Islam? This glorification of the guy is his downfall. The only thing still holding Islam till now is the entrenched lie and length of time it has lasted. But both are now collapsing like a pack of cards. But Jesus will welcome all those who believe in it hitherto and forgive them and give them true peace, just like he did for the adulterous woman caught in the very act. Jesus forgives. Muhammad could not, that's why he did what a natural man would do: condemn.

The way she adds "warawarasala" when she calls the name before giving the slam dunk! 😅

Anywhere and anyhow you turn Jesus, it's beauty beautiful 😍

@Bidexboy0 This woman needs to be protected at all cost… she’ll quickly become a no1 target

If not for our Democratic constitution and the Democratic Courts, women would have been executed by stoning under Shari'a in Nigeria for offence of Adultery and the men were left. Shari'a is evil. Anyone that says Islam is Shari'a, both the Islam and the Shari'a are evil.

Abeg share her handle na

Sahih al bukhari 3175 says someone sent juju on Muhammad and Muhammad was affected by it, yoruba call it gan-gan-gan, prophet Muhammad became "mentally deranged" after the hit him. Majority of what Muhammad did & said was when he was mad and his followers didn't know on time.

When someone is caught in adultery in those days, the people who were sure they saw her themselves were the first to cast stones. Being the first to cast the stone was their way of condemning the person. What Jesus did was to switch it on them. He showed them that it is not he who caught her but he who has not done same that can condemn her. When those who caught her red handed could not condemn her, those who only joined the crowd had no option.

Is this what you should be doing at this time, if you truly want a New Nigeria, when our focus should be on unity, this is misplaced priority. This looks calculated. Quit all these nonsense and focus on having a country to even practice first. "Jesus is Lord"

This here is a very powerful Gospel.

First of all Prophet Muhammad SAW was a head of state who maintained law and order in the land, jesus is not The adulterous woman knew the punishment for her crime is stoning to d@alt and she willingly volunteered to be punished for her crime Moreover it's in our narration that

Christ is love

Hmmm?

I am always curious to what Jesus wrote. My mom says it’s their sin Jesus wrote🤣

@grok is it true??

@mikecokere

@nudavid09 Yea shall know the truth and the truth will set you free… Truth is so powerful. When you hear it. You know.

Thank You Jesus Christ 🙌

This lady will definitely convince many people to enter into a debate without understanding the scriptures they claim to defend. Let us examine the story of the woman caught in adultery in John 8:3–11 and compare it with the Islamic position on adultery. FIRST: EVERY PROPHET HAD A MISSION. We cannot simply take one incident from the life of Jesus and use it to condemn the teachings and actions of Prophet Muhammad without examining the religious and legal contexts of both accounts. In John 8, the scribes and Pharisees brought a woman caught in adultery before Jesus and asked whether she should be stoned according to the Law of Moses. Jesus responded, "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her." One by one, the accusers left. Jesus then told the woman that he did not condemn her and instructed her to sin no more. Christians often present this account as a demonstration of mercy. Muslims can respect that lesson without accepting the argument that it automatically invalidates Islamic teachings on justice and accountability. SECOND: DOES EVERYONE BEING A SINNER MEAN THAT NO ONE SHOULD BE JUDGED? Absolutely not! If everyone who has ever committed a sin were automatically disqualified from administering justice, how could any society maintain a functioning justice system? A judge does not have to be a completely sinless person to deliver a lawful judgement. What matters is whether the judge applies the law fairly, considers the evidence and follows due process. However, personal wrongdoing must not be confused with legal guilt. Nobody should be punished merely because someone accuses them of a crime. Jesus' statement challenges self-righteousness and exposes the danger of condemning others hypocritically. It does not, by itself, establish that every legal punishment is unjust. THIRD: WHAT DID THE QURAN ACTUALLY SAY? Surah An-Nur 24:2 prescribes one hundred lashes for the man and woman guilty of zina, a term covering unlawful sexual intercourse. The Quran does not prescribe stoning in that verse. The punishment of stoning for married offenders is established in traditional Islamic jurisprudence through hadith reports attributed to Prophet Muhammad and the interpretations of classical Muslim scholars. Therefore, anyone comparing the Bible and Islam honestly must distinguish between what the Quran explicitly says and what is established through hadith and Islamic jurisprudence. FOURTH: WHY SHOULD PROPHET MUHAMMAD BE JUDGED FAIRLY? Traditional Islamic accounts describe cases in which individuals confessed to unlawful sexual intercourse and Prophet Muhammad ordered punishment under the law recognised in his community. Muslims who accept these reports understand his actions as implementing divine law, not as evidence that he was cruel or enjoyed punishing people. There is also an important legal distinction: traditional Islamic jurisprudence imposed strict evidentiary requirements for establishing zina, including four eyewitnesses to the act in cases proved by eyewitness testimony. Confession was another recognised route, subject to legal conditions and differences among scholars. These requirements matter because the law was not supposed to authorise people to attack others merely on the basis of rumours, suspicion or personal hatred. FIFTH: MERCY AND JUSTICE MUST BE EXAMINED HONESTLY. Jesus' response in John 8 highlights mercy, humility and the danger of hypocritical condemnation. The traditional Islamic position emphasises accountability under divine law, alongside requirements of evidence and judicial procedure. These are different approaches to a difficult moral and legal question. We should not pretend that they are identical, but neither should we misrepresent one tradition to glorify the other. If someone wants to criticise Prophet Muhammad, let the criticism be based on an accurate understanding of the Quran, hadith and Islamic jurisprudence, rather than selective quotations

If you go to her page on IG, I promise you, you’ll be stuck. Her kind of evangelism is so beautiful 🤩 God bless her soul 🙏🏽

Sahih Muslim book 29, hadith 4431

The sharia mongers won’t like this one!… @TinubuofficialABAT

I695b

Lovely! What's her page... I need to follow her ....

Beautiful. I'm enlightened today. Please what's her handle

What is this girls name or tweeter handle? I want to follow her

“Religion of piss” “Nooo the terrorism is sponsored by the west” When the ideology has always been violence and hostility towards different faith, humanity will never heal from this coincidence of history.

Our God Jesus teaches forgiveness And love One religion stones to death even after repentance Another teaches forgiveness even when caught in the act I choose Christ Jesus 🙏🏽

Wait and see how this people will start shouting blasphemy and crying for her head

Muhammed should never be compared to my Lord Jesus Christ.

Who is this woman?

Did I hear her say, "What-a-wahala", or is my ear paining me? 😅