Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

My thoughts on REDUCE AMI #ACC2024 John Mandrola, MD

73,421 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

Ole Fröbert's profile picture
Ole Fröbert2 years ago

@drjohnm This is brilliant. There are so many dogmas to challenge. “Randomization should be the rule, not the exception” - love that @YndigegnY @cpgale3 @DavidErlinge @MGtberg

Ramez Morcos, M.D. M.B.A's profile picture
Ramez Morcos, M.D. M.B.A2 years ago

@drjohnm The whole 15 min went like 5 seconds! Astonishing breakdown of the study. Thank you!

John D Kromkowski's profile picture
John D Kromkowski2 years ago

@drjohnm Thank you for your thoughtful review. Q of titration off BB presents very interesting issue. Thank you for touching on it. Not simple ethical issue to test whether less is more when the "more" has become SoC. Ongoing randomization 👍, but can med suppress ego to do?

kitkat2000's profile picture
kitkat20002 years ago

@drjohnm They prescribed the beta blockers but did not really achieve the beta blockade. Each patient is different and requires a different dose. Same flaw with perioperative beta blocker studies.

Kevin S Shah, MD's profile picture
Kevin S Shah, MD2 years ago

@drjohnm Well done (and timely!)

CharlieFoxtrot's profile picture
CharlieFoxtrot2 years ago

@drjohnm Curious in your opinion is reduction in LDL-C sufficient in ASCVD trials today for reimbursement decisions? Or is the bar reductions in CV events?

Leberecht 🇺🇦🇬🇪🇮🇱🇪🇺's profile picture
Leberecht 🇺🇦🇬🇪🇮🇱🇪🇺2 years ago

@drjohnm sapere aude 🙏🏻

Jlynn's profile picture
Jlynn2 years ago

@drjohnm Docs put migraine sufferers on this drug. Had me on it a year and I said no, I don't want to be on any meds not proven to do anything for me. Of course we're told they're "safe." not sure what it means in this context.

Related Videos