Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

n8n vs cursor, building a keyword research workflow Plus I'll give you my code no strings attached... you can use my version, my code, or try to use the logic to build it as a node-based workflow...whatever! what you need: - firecrawl API key - perplexity API key -...

33,375 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля The Boring Marketer
The Boring Marketer1 год назад

- GitHub Repository: - URL to test: remember you need the API keys!

Фото профиля Aron Korenblit
Aron Korenblit1 год назад

Love this, how about we livestream building this in Gumloop and see how quickly we can get it running? no need for any API keys either.

Фото профиля Aki
Aki1 год назад

this is golden! so building it completely with cursor was faster than building an n8n workflow?

Фото профиля The Boring Marketer
The Boring Marketer1 год назад

Easily!

Фото профиля Cuptooshio
Cuptooshio1 год назад

Love your insights and knowledge. Thanks my man.

Фото профиля The Boring Marketer
The Boring Marketer1 год назад

I appreciate that!

Фото профиля Marcus Kohlberg
Marcus Kohlberg1 год назад

Curious if you'd find even simpler, happy to help you recreate this in a 15min 1:1, but doubt you'll need the help

Фото профиля alwaysmoses
alwaysmoses1 год назад

Thanks...

Фото профиля derek b moore
derek b moore1 год назад

my mate is trying to get people in a cohort for some educational thingy this is a perfect primer to get my toes wet thank you brother

Фото профиля SLOAN
SLOAN1 год назад

You are the man

Фото профиля The Boring Marketer
The Boring Marketer1 год назад

🙏

Похожие видео

I built an agent that answers machine-learning questions. It's autonomous, and the best part is that I built the whole thing without writing a single line of Python code. Here is what I did and how I did it: Over a year ago, a friend and I built a site that publishes multi-choice questions. You get a new one every day. I decided to have GPT-3.5 answer questions. Here is what I needed to build: 1. Connect to the site's API to retrieve today's question 2. Extract the question and the potential choices 3. Connect to OpenAI's API and ask GPT-3.5 to answer the question 4. Parse the answer from the model 5. Submit the answer back to the API to get the score Not difficult. Likely several hours of work. But I didn't have to write any code. I built the whole thing by dragging and dropping components using Vellum is a YC-backed platform for developers to build LLM applications. They are the only ones I've seen offering this functionality. They sponsored this post, and their team helped me with all my questions while I built this. I created a workflow. The platform supports several node types to build whatever you have in mind. I show how I put the whole thing together in the attached video. The only code I had to write was a few lines of Jinja to parse and transform the API and the LLM results. There are three lessons I want to share from this experience: First, the best possible code is the one you didn't write. I'm a big fan of no-code tools because they help me materialize my ideas fast. They help product people, designers, and no coders collaborate on the solution. Second, Large Language Models are sensitive to how you prompt them. Small changes to prompts can make a big difference in results. This is more pronounced when you are building a multi-step workflow. Third, automated testing and evaluation for prompts is critical. There aren't many companies thinking about this. They'll have a hard time moving from a demo phase. The attached video will show you what I did.

Santiago

309,825 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад