Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Nabavian: My objection to Clause 6 is that it talks about “reconstruction and economic development”, not damages, compensation, or reparations. The Leader clearly said to collect compensation for damages to Iran, but those words are missing from the text. The $300 billion is also vague. It says America will...

AryJeayBackup's profile picture

Arya Yadeghaar (Backup)

64,684 subscribers

14,242 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразованиеФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 WOW! President Trump just flipped the script on Iran: The mullahs demand "reparations" from him, now 47 is demanding MASSIVE compensation from the regime for their atrocities against America and humanity "If there's damages to be paid, I think IRAN should pay those damages!" 🔥 "They asked for reparations...well, WE'RE going to ask for money for the damage, they've done over a 50-year period!" "All of the people that were so badly hurt, so badly wounded or killed, many thousands of people, and maybe damages for the 52,000 protesters over the last four months that were killed in Iran." "We think their family should get damages for killing their person or their child or mother father that were protesting, at least it was 52,000 a month and a half ago."
0:49

🚨 WOW! President Trump just flipped the script on Iran: The mullahs demand "reparations" from him, now 47 is demanding MASSIVE compensation from the regime for their atrocities against America and humanity "If there's damages to be paid, I think IRAN should pay those damages!" 🔥 "They asked for reparations...well, WE'RE going to ask for money for the damage, they've done over a 50-year period!" "All of the people that were so badly hurt, so badly wounded or killed, many thousands of people, and maybe damages for the 52,000 protesters over the last four months that were killed in Iran." "We think their family should get damages for killing their person or their child or mother father that were protesting, at least it was 52,000 a month and a half ago."

Eric Daugherty

48,313 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Nabavian: Clause 14 of the agreement text is very bad. They say our “guarantee” is a UNSC resolution, The final agreement, under a binding UN Security Council resolution, is not a real guarantee for Iran. We already experienced this with the JCPOA and Resolution 2231: America withdrew, but Iran remained trapped under international obligations, and snapback became possible. Once the agreement goes to the Security Council, Iran does not control the text. America and other members can add extra restrictions, just like they added missile, arms, and inspection-related issues around the JCPOA. So the guarantee should not be a UN resolution. The guarantee should be clear consequences if America violates the deal: Iran leaves the NPT, fully closes the Strait of Hormoz, resumes enrichment at any level and stockpiles it, and America must first get congressional approval. Also, if the deal is supposed to end war on all Resistance fronts, Iran’s allies must be removed from terrorist lists.
2:45

Nabavian: Clause 14 of the agreement text is very bad. They say our “guarantee” is a UNSC resolution, The final agreement, under a binding UN Security Council resolution, is not a real guarantee for Iran. We already experienced this with the JCPOA and Resolution 2231: America withdrew, but Iran remained trapped under international obligations, and snapback became possible. Once the agreement goes to the Security Council, Iran does not control the text. America and other members can add extra restrictions, just like they added missile, arms, and inspection-related issues around the JCPOA. So the guarantee should not be a UN resolution. The guarantee should be clear consequences if America violates the deal: Iran leaves the NPT, fully closes the Strait of Hormoz, resumes enrichment at any level and stockpiles it, and America must first get congressional approval. Also, if the deal is supposed to end war on all Resistance fronts, Iran’s allies must be removed from terrorist lists.

Arya Yadeghaar (Backup)

27,406 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Senior Iranian official Mohsen Rezaee to CNN: If Trump takes the negotiations seriously, $24 billion is not much to America. If he wants to reach an agreement with Iran, this $24 billion is a test of trust that Iran wants to have with Trump. This is a test that America must pass, and the path will be open. This is our money, not America's money.
0:30

Senior Iranian official Mohsen Rezaee to CNN: If Trump takes the negotiations seriously, $24 billion is not much to America. If he wants to reach an agreement with Iran, this $24 billion is a test of trust that Iran wants to have with Trump. This is a test that America must pass, and the path will be open. This is our money, not America's money.

Clash Report

125,083 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei: What is the issue between America and Iran? This confrontation that has existed for forty-odd years—Iran and America have animosity—what is this issue? In my opinion, the issue can be summarized in just two words. Those two words are: America wants to swallow Iran, and the brave nation of Iran and the Islamic Republic are the obstacle.
0:31

Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei: What is the issue between America and Iran? This confrontation that has existed for forty-odd years—Iran and America have animosity—what is this issue? In my opinion, the issue can be summarized in just two words. Those two words are: America wants to swallow Iran, and the brave nation of Iran and the Islamic Republic are the obstacle.

Clash Report

52,285 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.JD Vance explained some details of the deal to CBS. Many people are misrepresenting it maliciously, so let's clear some things up. NO the US will not pay Iran $300B IF Iran gives up all its nuke stuff then a fund for investment & reconstruction w/ Gulf & other $$$ is proposed. NO there is no agreement to unfreeze $24B now or at any point. IF Iran honors its commitments it will get sanctions relief. YES the US will be directly involved in verifying the nuclear material and program are destroyed. We may not be the ones who do the destruction but we will witness it and be part of inspections to ensure it is not reconstituted. There is no reason for all the caterwauling about reconstruction in Iran. Any deal was going to involve that and any money going in will be monitores. Of course the regime will steal some and we will be watching to ensure it doesn't get used for malign purposes. It's sad to watch so many people actively hoping this deal won't work and lying about what it comprises. As described this deal is a major victory for the US, the region and the world. If they follow through it could also be a return of Iran to the community of nations. If the regime doesn't abide by the deal they have made. Their days are certainly numbered. But this offers a real chance to secure the region and aim it toward prosperity.
2:21

.JD Vance explained some details of the deal to CBS. Many people are misrepresenting it maliciously, so let's clear some things up. NO the US will not pay Iran $300B IF Iran gives up all its nuke stuff then a fund for investment & reconstruction w/ Gulf & other $$$ is proposed. NO there is no agreement to unfreeze $24B now or at any point. IF Iran honors its commitments it will get sanctions relief. YES the US will be directly involved in verifying the nuclear material and program are destroyed. We may not be the ones who do the destruction but we will witness it and be part of inspections to ensure it is not reconstituted. There is no reason for all the caterwauling about reconstruction in Iran. Any deal was going to involve that and any money going in will be monitores. Of course the regime will steal some and we will be watching to ensure it doesn't get used for malign purposes. It's sad to watch so many people actively hoping this deal won't work and lying about what it comprises. As described this deal is a major victory for the US, the region and the world. If they follow through it could also be a return of Iran to the community of nations. If the regime doesn't abide by the deal they have made. Their days are certainly numbered. But this offers a real chance to secure the region and aim it toward prosperity.

Jim Hanson

85,231 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 NOW: Iran is publicly demanding that President Trump gives them DAMAGES and compensation for the war 🤡🤡 The mullahs refuse to admit in public that Trump doesn't back down to terrorists. Even JD VANCE says the pressure is holding and Trump will NOT trust a word Iran says until they prove it Trey Yingst: "...calling for the US to end the war and compensate Iran for damages before the Strait would open."
1:34

🚨 NOW: Iran is publicly demanding that President Trump gives them DAMAGES and compensation for the war 🤡🤡 The mullahs refuse to admit in public that Trump doesn't back down to terrorists. Even JD VANCE says the pressure is holding and Trump will NOT trust a word Iran says until they prove it Trey Yingst: "...calling for the US to end the war and compensate Iran for damages before the Strait would open."

Eric Daugherty

146,179 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

If the IRGC is left in control of Iran, America will never be secure. We need to keep at this and show the Iranian regime - and the world - that we are ready to do what it takes to win.
0:31

If the IRGC is left in control of Iran, America will never be secure. We need to keep at this and show the Iranian regime - and the world - that we are ready to do what it takes to win.

Mike Pompeo

248,766 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 NOW: Sen. Rick Scott GOES HARD on the $300 billion Iran reparation fund report, saying NOT A SINGLE DIME of American money will go to them "The Republicans are NOT the party of Barack Obama!" "Iran wants a reparation fund? There will NEVER be a DIME of American money to be spent on reparations for Iran!" "By the way, is Iran going to go rebuild Gaza after they destroyed it with Hamas, or they could rebuild Lebanon after they destroyed it with Hezbollah, or rebuild Yemen, which are destroying with the Houthis they support?!" "I'm hopeful the whole Trump can get a deal, I don't, I'm very pessimistic that will happen, so I think we're going to have to go back and destroy the Revolutionary Guard." Kayleigh McEnany Saturday in America Rick Scott
0:43

🚨 NOW: Sen. Rick Scott GOES HARD on the $300 billion Iran reparation fund report, saying NOT A SINGLE DIME of American money will go to them "The Republicans are NOT the party of Barack Obama!" "Iran wants a reparation fund? There will NEVER be a DIME of American money to be spent on reparations for Iran!" "By the way, is Iran going to go rebuild Gaza after they destroyed it with Hamas, or they could rebuild Lebanon after they destroyed it with Hezbollah, or rebuild Yemen, which are destroying with the Houthis they support?!" "I'm hopeful the whole Trump can get a deal, I don't, I'm very pessimistic that will happen, so I think we're going to have to go back and destroy the Revolutionary Guard." Kayleigh McEnany Saturday in America Rick Scott

Eric Daugherty

255,535 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

With the attacks by Hamas in Israel, a lot of people are spreading misinformation alleging that the US gave Iran $6 billion and that this money is the cause for the escalation. This is simply an outright lie. - Yes, Iran has supported Hamas, and Hamas obtained a lot of weapons from Iran. - No, the US did NOT give Iran $6 billion, and it certainly did not end up in the hands of terrorists. What really happened with the $6 billion. - The US unfroze $6 billion in Iranian money (Not US money or US taxpayer dollars). It was Iran’s money that was in South Korean bank accounts. The money came from oil sales that were put into accounts that were set up under the Trump administration. - The US allowed the money to be transferred to accounts in Qatar, without violating sanctions, in exchange for 5 US citizens getting to come home to their families. - The US has strict limits on how the money can be used, and it is NOT under the complete control of the Iranian government. The money is only permitted to be taken out in exchange for humanitarian purchase such as food, medicine, and farm supplies. The US still has the ability to freeze the money if any rules are broken and they can validate where every dollar that is withdrawn ends up going. Those are the facts.
0:34

With the attacks by Hamas in Israel, a lot of people are spreading misinformation alleging that the US gave Iran $6 billion and that this money is the cause for the escalation. This is simply an outright lie. - Yes, Iran has supported Hamas, and Hamas obtained a lot of weapons from Iran. - No, the US did NOT give Iran $6 billion, and it certainly did not end up in the hands of terrorists. What really happened with the $6 billion. - The US unfroze $6 billion in Iranian money (Not US money or US taxpayer dollars). It was Iran’s money that was in South Korean bank accounts. The money came from oil sales that were put into accounts that were set up under the Trump administration. - The US allowed the money to be transferred to accounts in Qatar, without violating sanctions, in exchange for 5 US citizens getting to come home to their families. - The US has strict limits on how the money can be used, and it is NOT under the complete control of the Iranian government. The money is only permitted to be taken out in exchange for humanitarian purchase such as food, medicine, and farm supplies. The US still has the ability to freeze the money if any rules are broken and they can validate where every dollar that is withdrawn ends up going. Those are the facts.

Ed Krassenstein

5,058,909 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🇮🇷 Iranian Parliament Member: The UAE should provide Iran with its territory as compensation for damages. Hossein Ali Hajji Delijani: The recent agreement between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, consisting of eight points, indicates the failure of the American strategy in the region. The UAE, which spent 9 trillion dollars of its oil revenues to buy security from the United States, is now facing a new reality. In light of these events, the UAE should compensate Iran for the damage caused, and it is even possible that they will have to provide their entire territory to Iran for many years.
2:48

🇮🇷 Iranian Parliament Member: The UAE should provide Iran with its territory as compensation for damages. Hossein Ali Hajji Delijani: The recent agreement between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, consisting of eight points, indicates the failure of the American strategy in the region. The UAE, which spent 9 trillion dollars of its oil revenues to buy security from the United States, is now facing a new reality. In light of these events, the UAE should compensate Iran for the damage caused, and it is even possible that they will have to provide their entire territory to Iran for many years.

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

26,602 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

America thinks it has two allies in this war. Israel. Saudi Arabia. Both are cheering America on. Both are sending support. Both are publicly on America's side. And according to game theory — both want America to lose. Not just Iran. All three. Iran wants America destroyed to control the Middle East. Israel wants America destroyed to become the sole power in the region. Saudi Arabia wants America destroyed to survive the next 50 years. They all have different reasons. They all have different strategies. But they all agree on one thing: The best outcome for everyone is America trapped in a 10-year ground war that destroys its political will to ever fight another foreign war again. America doesn't have enemies in this war. It has three players who are all pulling it in the same direction. Into the trap.
2:46

America thinks it has two allies in this war. Israel. Saudi Arabia. Both are cheering America on. Both are sending support. Both are publicly on America's side. And according to game theory — both want America to lose. Not just Iran. All three. Iran wants America destroyed to control the Middle East. Israel wants America destroyed to become the sole power in the region. Saudi Arabia wants America destroyed to survive the next 50 years. They all have different reasons. They all have different strategies. But they all agree on one thing: The best outcome for everyone is America trapped in a 10-year ground war that destroys its political will to ever fight another foreign war again. America doesn't have enemies in this war. It has three players who are all pulling it in the same direction. Into the trap.

Predictive History

192,084 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump has tried military force and economic strangulation against Iran; now Tehran has concluded that pressure simply does not work Iran has taken enormous punishment. Its economy is reeling, inflation is brutal, and its military has absorbed repeated strikes. But six months into the war, the regime is still standing, and crucially, Iran can still disrupt the Strait of Hormuz. Middle East scholar Joshua Landis believes that has fundamentally changed Tehran's calculation. Washington has moved from military force to its new “Economic D-Day,” but the regional cooperation needed to make that strategy truly devastating isn't materialising. Iraq, Turkey, the UAE and Qatar still have powerful incentives to trade with Iran. Oman is negotiating with Tehran. Pakistan and Qatar are talking to the Iranians. These countries don't want another regional war or a permanently closed Persian Gulf, and Iran knows it. Joshua says Tehran increasingly believes America has already played its strongest cards, which makes surrender even less attractive. Iranian leaders now believe that if they cave to Trump's demands, America and Israel will simply return once Iran has recovered and hit it again. In Joshua's words, Iran fears becoming another Gaza, Lebanon or Syria; periodically attacked to keep it permanently weak. So Tehran has reached the opposite conclusion: It has to make resisting Iran more painful than living with it. Tehran may finally have learned the difference between America having the power to hurt it, and having the power to make it surrender. Joshua Landis Brandon Weichert
26:59

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump has tried military force and economic strangulation against Iran; now Tehran has concluded that pressure simply does not work Iran has taken enormous punishment. Its economy is reeling, inflation is brutal, and its military has absorbed repeated strikes. But six months into the war, the regime is still standing, and crucially, Iran can still disrupt the Strait of Hormuz. Middle East scholar Joshua Landis believes that has fundamentally changed Tehran's calculation. Washington has moved from military force to its new “Economic D-Day,” but the regional cooperation needed to make that strategy truly devastating isn't materialising. Iraq, Turkey, the UAE and Qatar still have powerful incentives to trade with Iran. Oman is negotiating with Tehran. Pakistan and Qatar are talking to the Iranians. These countries don't want another regional war or a permanently closed Persian Gulf, and Iran knows it. Joshua says Tehran increasingly believes America has already played its strongest cards, which makes surrender even less attractive. Iranian leaders now believe that if they cave to Trump's demands, America and Israel will simply return once Iran has recovered and hit it again. In Joshua's words, Iran fears becoming another Gaza, Lebanon or Syria; periodically attacked to keep it permanently weak. So Tehran has reached the opposite conclusion: It has to make resisting Iran more painful than living with it. Tehran may finally have learned the difference between America having the power to hurt it, and having the power to make it surrender. Joshua Landis Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

215,721 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

⚡️NEW Iran's Supreme Leader's Military Advisor states that Tehran wants its Money back, or there will be no Deal: "The negotiations are at a deadlock and Trump must break the deadlock If Trump takes the negotiations seriously, $24 billion is not much to America This $24 billion is a test of trust that. This is a test that America must pass This is our money, not America's money"
0:39

⚡️NEW Iran's Supreme Leader's Military Advisor states that Tehran wants its Money back, or there will be no Deal: "The negotiations are at a deadlock and Trump must break the deadlock If Trump takes the negotiations seriously, $24 billion is not much to America This $24 billion is a test of trust that. This is a test that America must pass This is our money, not America's money"

Iran Observer

106,406 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

#WATCH | On the next steps with Iran, US President Donald Trump says, "You will find out... They asked for reparations, they asked for money for the damage that we've done. And I said, that's a good idea. Well, we're to ask for money for the damage they've done over a 50-year period... So if there's damages to be paid, I think Iran should pay those damages." (Source: White House/Youtube)
1:10

#WATCH | On the next steps with Iran, US President Donald Trump says, "You will find out... They asked for reparations, they asked for money for the damage that we've done. And I said, that's a good idea. Well, we're to ask for money for the damage they've done over a 50-year period... So if there's damages to be paid, I think Iran should pay those damages." (Source: White House/Youtube)

ANI

18,495 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | On the #UnionBudget2026, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "... Last year they had announced Rs 100 crores for the Chabahar port in the budget estimates. Then that went up to Rs 400 crores in the revised estimates, and this year's budget is zero, which looks like we're giving up on the port. In view of the current geopolitical situation, with the squeeze on Iran, the increasing sanctions from Western countries, and the demand that we not cooperate with Iran, it's a very valuable relationship we've had for a long time, but it looks like we appear to be abandoning the idea of spending any money on that port. It may be true that there are practical obstacles. If everything is sanctioned, how do you spend money? And what happens to those who do go there? Because those companies are active in Chabahar, then will be sanctioned by the West as well. Even Indian companies will be sanctioned. So that may be the reason. But it does look like it's a surrender to a particular policy that has been imposed from the outside on Iran. The very fact that there is no money in the budget suggests that."
1:05

#WATCH | On the #UnionBudget2026, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "... Last year they had announced Rs 100 crores for the Chabahar port in the budget estimates. Then that went up to Rs 400 crores in the revised estimates, and this year's budget is zero, which looks like we're giving up on the port. In view of the current geopolitical situation, with the squeeze on Iran, the increasing sanctions from Western countries, and the demand that we not cooperate with Iran, it's a very valuable relationship we've had for a long time, but it looks like we appear to be abandoning the idea of spending any money on that port. It may be true that there are practical obstacles. If everything is sanctioned, how do you spend money? And what happens to those who do go there? Because those companies are active in Chabahar, then will be sanctioned by the West as well. Even Indian companies will be sanctioned. So that may be the reason. But it does look like it's a surrender to a particular policy that has been imposed from the outside on Iran. The very fact that there is no money in the budget suggests that."

ANI

11,663 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Reporter: You mentioned you saw in your interview the Iran deal, the details of it. What's your understanding of the 300 billion? Where is that money going to come from? And you also mentioned that Canada may have a role. Canada's Carney: To be clear, there's no Canadian money going in that. If you have money that's linked to, which is the case with this deal, conditions and the fulfillment of those conditions and being managed, sometimes you have third countries do that. Canada is, of course, willing to help if that's appropriate.
1:00

Reporter: You mentioned you saw in your interview the Iran deal, the details of it. What's your understanding of the 300 billion? Where is that money going to come from? And you also mentioned that Canada may have a role. Canada's Carney: To be clear, there's no Canadian money going in that. If you have money that's linked to, which is the case with this deal, conditions and the fulfillment of those conditions and being managed, sometimes you have third countries do that. Canada is, of course, willing to help if that's appropriate.

Clash Report

40,298 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) explains why Saudi Arabia, after watching the West freeze nearly $300 billion of Russian assets, is now paying a protection racket to Turkey and Pakistan. The Gulf states understand their own trillions in Western-held sovereign wealth are next. The new alliance is not about defending Israel—it is about acquiring new protectors before the imperial system loots everything. Host Zulfikar, who has direct access to the relevant deliberations, confirms the assessment as simply “protection money.” Krainer: “Everybody saw how the Western powers didn’t hesitate a moment to freeze almost 300 billion dollars’ worth of Russian assets in the Western financial institutions. If they are brazen enough, if they are ruthless enough to do this to the number-one nuclear power in the world, then what is Saudi Arabia to them? It’s nothing. It’s a maggot they will squash whenever they choose to do so. Saudi Arabia not only has far more than Russia—last I looked they had something like 800 or 900 billion dollars in direct assets in the United States—but they also have these enormous sovereign wealth funds. The combined assets of the Saudi, UAE, Qatari, Bahraini and Kuwaiti sovereign wealth funds in the West are something close to five trillion dollars. One thing we can take as a near-100% certainty is that before the Western empire fails, it is going to loot all of that money and take it for its own ends. After Ukraine and after what they did to Russia, these rulers may be corrupt, they may be brutal, they may be ruthless and oppressive, but they are not stupid. They see the writing on the wall. They see what is coming their way. The way I interpret this new alliance between Pakistan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia is that Saudi Arabia is deciding to pay a protection racket to Turkey and Pakistan. Two of these three nations are major military powers; one of them is a pipsqueak. Why would Pakistan and Turkey sign an alliance with Saudi Arabia—an attack on one is an attack on all? If somebody attacks Turkey, is Saudi Arabia going to come to their aid? That’s a joke. I think the Saudis initiated this by saying: we are already screwed. We are going to get skinned alive. All our sovereign asset funds—we are probably never going to see them again. So what we can do is, since you are already at least on paper allied with the United States, you can become our protectors. We will pay you for it with these funds that are in the United States. If we say ‘send us a trillion dollars,’ Trump is going to say no—why don’t we send you a trillion dollars’ worth of Patriot missiles that we will deliver in 2046? But if Turkey or Pakistan say ‘send us a trillion dollars,’ the United States may have to send the money. Saudi Arabia gets new protectors, and these new protectors get some of the Saudi money.” Zulfikar: “Alex, a lot of nonsense has been said about this, but you have cut to the chase. You have uttered the words that are the truest words describing what has just taken place. I say this sitting in a position where I have actually listened to the deliberations between people who put their names on the piece of paper. I am that close to the scene. Exactly what you have said is the truth. It is very simple. Saudi Arabia is buying protection. It is protection money. Easy, very simple to understand. And Saudi Arabia watched with great dismay the destruction of the United States by Iran—under 50 years of sanctions.” The Gulf states have read the writing on the wall. Paying a protection racket to real military powers is their attempt to escape the coming looting of the imperial system.
5:19

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) explains why Saudi Arabia, after watching the West freeze nearly $300 billion of Russian assets, is now paying a protection racket to Turkey and Pakistan. The Gulf states understand their own trillions in Western-held sovereign wealth are next. The new alliance is not about defending Israel—it is about acquiring new protectors before the imperial system loots everything. Host Zulfikar, who has direct access to the relevant deliberations, confirms the assessment as simply “protection money.” Krainer: “Everybody saw how the Western powers didn’t hesitate a moment to freeze almost 300 billion dollars’ worth of Russian assets in the Western financial institutions. If they are brazen enough, if they are ruthless enough to do this to the number-one nuclear power in the world, then what is Saudi Arabia to them? It’s nothing. It’s a maggot they will squash whenever they choose to do so. Saudi Arabia not only has far more than Russia—last I looked they had something like 800 or 900 billion dollars in direct assets in the United States—but they also have these enormous sovereign wealth funds. The combined assets of the Saudi, UAE, Qatari, Bahraini and Kuwaiti sovereign wealth funds in the West are something close to five trillion dollars. One thing we can take as a near-100% certainty is that before the Western empire fails, it is going to loot all of that money and take it for its own ends. After Ukraine and after what they did to Russia, these rulers may be corrupt, they may be brutal, they may be ruthless and oppressive, but they are not stupid. They see the writing on the wall. They see what is coming their way. The way I interpret this new alliance between Pakistan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia is that Saudi Arabia is deciding to pay a protection racket to Turkey and Pakistan. Two of these three nations are major military powers; one of them is a pipsqueak. Why would Pakistan and Turkey sign an alliance with Saudi Arabia—an attack on one is an attack on all? If somebody attacks Turkey, is Saudi Arabia going to come to their aid? That’s a joke. I think the Saudis initiated this by saying: we are already screwed. We are going to get skinned alive. All our sovereign asset funds—we are probably never going to see them again. So what we can do is, since you are already at least on paper allied with the United States, you can become our protectors. We will pay you for it with these funds that are in the United States. If we say ‘send us a trillion dollars,’ Trump is going to say no—why don’t we send you a trillion dollars’ worth of Patriot missiles that we will deliver in 2046? But if Turkey or Pakistan say ‘send us a trillion dollars,’ the United States may have to send the money. Saudi Arabia gets new protectors, and these new protectors get some of the Saudi money.” Zulfikar: “Alex, a lot of nonsense has been said about this, but you have cut to the chase. You have uttered the words that are the truest words describing what has just taken place. I say this sitting in a position where I have actually listened to the deliberations between people who put their names on the piece of paper. I am that close to the scene. Exactly what you have said is the truth. It is very simple. Saudi Arabia is buying protection. It is protection money. Easy, very simple to understand. And Saudi Arabia watched with great dismay the destruction of the United States by Iran—under 50 years of sanctions.” The Gulf states have read the writing on the wall. Paying a protection racket to real military powers is their attempt to escape the coming looting of the imperial system.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

61,680 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Senior Iranian parliamentarian Nabavian on the new Iran deal: "From Clause 3 onward, the text becomes very serious." His main objection: The 'final agreement' must be reached within 60 days, but it can be extended indefinitely by both sides with no limit. "Clause 4 says US forces must leave the region 30 days after the final agreement. But if the final agreement keeps getting delayed, so does the withdrawal.'' In his view, this benefits America, and Iran should have demanded a precise, fixed timeline. Source: SNN TV via Fotros Resistance (Telegram) / Writer: Oliver
2:22

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Senior Iranian parliamentarian Nabavian on the new Iran deal: "From Clause 3 onward, the text becomes very serious." His main objection: The 'final agreement' must be reached within 60 days, but it can be extended indefinitely by both sides with no limit. "Clause 4 says US forces must leave the region 30 days after the final agreement. But if the final agreement keeps getting delayed, so does the withdrawal.'' In his view, this benefits America, and Iran should have demanded a precise, fixed timeline. Source: SNN TV via Fotros Resistance (Telegram) / Writer: Oliver

Mario Nawfal

97,411 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Meiselas: While Donald Trump is out there talking about how the US taxpayers will not be giving Iran any money, the MOU between the US and Iran calls for a $300B investment fund to be available to Iran. What that fund really is, is the new security architecture for Iran. When you look through the terms of this MOU, what it does is it removes all sanctions against Iran. It allows Iran to open up its markets to other countries in the Middle East in ways that it wasn't able to before. And it encourages other countries in the Middle East and other countries across the world to make major investments in Iran. The Trump regime went from saying, "We want regime change in Iran," to "Now Iran is a major global power," and Iran is going to be wielding a massive amount of economic influence.
1:07

Meiselas: While Donald Trump is out there talking about how the US taxpayers will not be giving Iran any money, the MOU between the US and Iran calls for a $300B investment fund to be available to Iran. What that fund really is, is the new security architecture for Iran. When you look through the terms of this MOU, what it does is it removes all sanctions against Iran. It allows Iran to open up its markets to other countries in the Middle East in ways that it wasn't able to before. And it encourages other countries in the Middle East and other countries across the world to make major investments in Iran. The Trump regime went from saying, "We want regime change in Iran," to "Now Iran is a major global power," and Iran is going to be wielding a massive amount of economic influence.

MeidasClips

13,439 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад