正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Nah, this can’t be real. Same GPT-5.6 Sol. Same task. Same thinking level. I switched from regular Codex to the Claude Code harness, and the result instantly became way better. Claude Code is somehow making every model cook. GPT-5.6 SOL WAS ALREADY TOP TIER!! 😭

OmedTheVibeCoder

1,273 subscribers

126,693 次观看 • 19 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,239 次观看 • 28 天前

I stopped using the same AI to write and review code. Claude builds. GPT-5.2 Codex reviews. Result? More bugs caught, real security issues flagged, and better PRs all automated.

I stopped using the same AI to write and review code. Claude builds. GPT-5.2 Codex reviews. Result? More bugs caught, real security issues flagged, and better PRs all automated.

Mervin Praison

10,891 次观看 • 6 个月前

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.

Command Code

175,354 次观看 • 9 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

198,439 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kai

15,769 次观看 • 22 天前

Guys, stop underestimating the harness. GPT-5.6 Sol through Claude Code vs Codex produced a GIGANTIC difference in my benchmark. But Opus 5 is the real innovation: High, xHigh, and Max don’t just feel like different thinking levels—they feel like COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MODELS. It’s basically like getting three or four Opus models in one.

Guys, stop underestimating the harness. GPT-5.6 Sol through Claude Code vs Codex produced a GIGANTIC difference in my benchmark. But Opus 5 is the real innovation: High, xHigh, and Max don’t just feel like different thinking levels—they feel like COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MODELS. It’s basically like getting three or four Opus models in one.

OmedTheVibeCoder

35,970 次观看 • 17 天前

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Command Code

376,112 次观看 • 26 天前

Same job for both agents, sourcing from 200 posts across Reddit and X. Codex with gpt 5.6 sol took 13m43s. Yet Deepseek v4 flash took 5m19s. Don't forget gpt 5.6 sol is $30 per million out, while the flash is $0.28. No pressure. Just math. OpenAI Developers Good job DeepSeek. you just kill the game

Same job for both agents, sourcing from 200 posts across Reddit and X. Codex with gpt 5.6 sol took 13m43s. Yet Deepseek v4 flash took 5m19s. Don't forget gpt 5.6 sol is $30 per million out, while the flash is $0.28. No pressure. Just math. OpenAI Developers Good job DeepSeek. you just kill the game

ego

76,198 次观看 • 12 天前

New Release: Claudex Mode For the first time in mankind claude code and codex will be on the same team On the Blackbox CLI you can send the same task for Claude Code to implement and Codex to verify and test. You can choose more ways where they can collaborate on the same task to get the highest level of performance on your tasks

New Release: Claudex Mode For the first time in mankind claude code and codex will be on the same team On the Blackbox CLI you can send the same task for Claude Code to implement and Codex to verify and test. You can choose more ways where they can collaborate on the same task to get the highest level of performance on your tasks

BLACKBOX AI

304,664 次观看 • 5 个月前

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

Avid

139,979 次观看 • 1 个月前

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai

Hamza

258,366 次观看 • 27 天前

When GPT-5 came out, I created a procedural brutalist city builder as a demo (you can see it in the quoted tweet) I used GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex to do the same thing, touching no code. Less than a year... Play with it (its fun, if you like cities):

When GPT-5 came out, I created a procedural brutalist city builder as a demo (you can see it in the quoted tweet) I used GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex to do the same thing, touching no code. Less than a year... Play with it (its fun, if you like cities):

Ethan Mollick

186,463 次观看 • 1 个月前

⚡️OPENAI: GPT-5.6 SOL IS 54% MORE TOKEN EFFICIENT ON AGENTIC CODING Sam Altman says the new GPT-5.6 Sol model is 54% more token efficient on agentic coding tasks and is “as good or better” than competing models. He also said OpenAI aims to offer better value with “every enterprise now is thinking about spend and the value they’re getting in exchange for AI.”

⚡️OPENAI: GPT-5.6 SOL IS 54% MORE TOKEN EFFICIENT ON AGENTIC CODING Sam Altman says the new GPT-5.6 Sol model is 54% more token efficient on agentic coding tasks and is “as good or better” than competing models. He also said OpenAI aims to offer better value with “every enterprise now is thinking about spend and the value they’re getting in exchange for AI.”

Coin Bureau

33,775 次观看 • 1 个月前

The character pipeline is moving forward: animations are now working. I lost some time because Codex occasionally switched GPT-5.6 Sol back to Light/Medium by default, and the difference in task execution was immediately noticeable. After switching back to GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra, progress was much smoother. Using animations from Mixamo, the character can now idle, walk, run and jump. Next: shoes, skin variations and different body types. Then I need to decide what this project should become: • A character generator website? • A reusable Codex skill? • An open-source GitHub repo? What would be the most useful?

The character pipeline is moving forward: animations are now working. I lost some time because Codex occasionally switched GPT-5.6 Sol back to Light/Medium by default, and the difference in task execution was immediately noticeable. After switching back to GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra, progress was much smoother. Using animations from Mixamo, the character can now idle, walk, run and jump. Next: shoes, skin variations and different body types. Then I need to decide what this project should become: • A character generator website? • A reusable Codex skill? • An open-source GitHub repo? What would be the most useful?

Givros

16,719 次观看 • 29 天前

🚨 Frontier Model Router - Mix And Match All the Frontier LLMs Our most popular custom router is our frontier-model router that combines the best LLMs for all your tasks GPT 5.6 sol - data analysis Fable / Opus 4.8 - coding Flash 3.5 - summarization Grok 4.5 - real-time Pick your favorite LLMs for all your tasks. As of today the custom routers can be used in ANY harness - Abacus AI, Claude, Codex, Open-Code....

🚨 Frontier Model Router - Mix And Match All the Frontier LLMs Our most popular custom router is our frontier-model router that combines the best LLMs for all your tasks GPT 5.6 sol - data analysis Fable / Opus 4.8 - coding Flash 3.5 - summarization Grok 4.5 - real-time Pick your favorite LLMs for all your tasks. As of today the custom routers can be used in ANY harness - Abacus AI, Claude, Codex, Open-Code....

Bindu Reddy

4,592,609 次观看 • 28 天前

It worked!! Kimi k3 Oauth is now wired directly into codex. The Kimi k3 model is insane but their app is not. So I figure a better way to use k3 by hooking my sub straight into codex instead. K3 now sits in the model picker next to Sol 5.6. Same subscription i was already paying for, no api key, just have to do OAuth in Kimi Code. Links down below 👇

It worked!! Kimi k3 Oauth is now wired directly into codex. The Kimi k3 model is insane but their app is not. So I figure a better way to use k3 by hooking my sub straight into codex instead. K3 now sits in the model picker next to Sol 5.6. Same subscription i was already paying for, no api key, just have to do OAuth in Kimi Code. Links down below 👇

Ziwen

274,865 次观看 • 23 天前

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

57,544 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex Same Prompt in Cursor (Neutral Harness) - Default Settings! GPT 5.3 Codex took - 2 mins Claude Sonnet 4.6 - 7 mins Cheaper than Sonnet 4.6! Faster than Sonnet 4.6! But I'm not sure if it's more craftier than Sonnet 4.6 because Sonnet's got a taste! Claude Sonnet 4.6 had a better result (aesthetically) and also more solid techstack - GPT 5.3 codes meanwhile just got the job done!

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex Same Prompt in Cursor (Neutral Harness) - Default Settings! GPT 5.3 Codex took - 2 mins Claude Sonnet 4.6 - 7 mins Cheaper than Sonnet 4.6! Faster than Sonnet 4.6! But I'm not sure if it's more craftier than Sonnet 4.6 because Sonnet's got a taste! Claude Sonnet 4.6 had a better result (aesthetically) and also more solid techstack - GPT 5.3 codes meanwhile just got the job done!

1LittleCoder💻

142,846 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Deepseek V4 pro GA is being tested to few users > this is the output on the same prompt that was used for kimi k3 and GPT sol 5.6 in the quoted video > The details are solid , addition of tents , campfire and everything this model looks promising

🚨 Deepseek V4 pro GA is being tested to few users > this is the output on the same prompt that was used for kimi k3 and GPT sol 5.6 in the quoted video > The details are solid , addition of tents , campfire and everything this model looks promising

Chetaslua

172,573 次观看 • 25 天前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,405 次观看 • 1 个月前