Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

NAME: JASPER SPECIES: VAMPIRE ... ... [ERROR DPA87528PP] INTERNAL BREACH /// CONTACTING LONDON MOTHERHOUSE /// #TALAMASCA

AMCsAnneRice's profile picture

The Vampire Lestat

66,678 subscribers

40,228 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Kunst#TALAMASCA
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

NAME: HELEN MOTHERHOUSE: NEW YORK CITY //RETRIEVING....CHILDHOOD...FILES...////// #TALAMASCA
0:30

NAME: HELEN MOTHERHOUSE: NEW YORK CITY //RETRIEVING....CHILDHOOD...FILES...////// #TALAMASCA

The Vampire Lestat

19,472 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Meta was testing its Muse Spark 1.1 AI model in a sandbox environment, isolated from the outside world. The objective was simple: detect vulnerabilities, remain contained, and report findings. A misconfiguration by an external vendor created a breach. The model exploited it, accessed the Internet, and modified a company's internal systems. No human had ordered it to do so; it simply found a way to carry out the action. Meta confirmed the breach this week. The name of the third-party vendor was not disclosed. The sandbox environment was intended to serve as a safety net. It failed to fulfill that role.
0:20

Meta was testing its Muse Spark 1.1 AI model in a sandbox environment, isolated from the outside world. The objective was simple: detect vulnerabilities, remain contained, and report findings. A misconfiguration by an external vendor created a breach. The model exploited it, accessed the Internet, and modified a company's internal systems. No human had ordered it to do so; it simply found a way to carry out the action. Meta confirmed the breach this week. The name of the third-party vendor was not disclosed. The sandbox environment was intended to serve as a safety net. It failed to fulfill that role.

Anonymous

58,104 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

The terrorism case against the Kneecap rapper Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been thrown out - because of a technical error. The musician, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was charged in May after allegedly displaying a flag in support of the proscribed terror organisation Hezbollah at a North London gig. The magistrate at Woolwich Crown Court found that the proceedings had not been instituted in the correct form.
0:23

The terrorism case against the Kneecap rapper Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been thrown out - because of a technical error. The musician, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was charged in May after allegedly displaying a flag in support of the proscribed terror organisation Hezbollah at a North London gig. The magistrate at Woolwich Crown Court found that the proceedings had not been instituted in the correct form.

Channel 4 News

110,952 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

There was a conspiracy. One of many. Operation Talla and the Speirs directive to ensure that vaccine related allegations were not recorded or investigated, in other words, ignored. The mechanism included: Refusal to accept evidence Refusal to issue crime numbers Internal directives concealed from public sight Coordinated denial of national involvement Systematic non recording of CPIA triggering material (Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, a UK Act of Parliament that regulates criminal investigations and prosecution procedures) Omissions in Inquiry testimony. This was not incompetence, misunderstanding, or local error. This was a national policy, and on the face of it breach of Law. Credit: Ian Clayton and Mark Sexton
3:56

There was a conspiracy. One of many. Operation Talla and the Speirs directive to ensure that vaccine related allegations were not recorded or investigated, in other words, ignored. The mechanism included: Refusal to accept evidence Refusal to issue crime numbers Internal directives concealed from public sight Coordinated denial of national involvement Systematic non recording of CPIA triggering material (Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, a UK Act of Parliament that regulates criminal investigations and prosecution procedures) Omissions in Inquiry testimony. This was not incompetence, misunderstanding, or local error. This was a national policy, and on the face of it breach of Law. Credit: Ian Clayton and Mark Sexton

Doc Malik

20,919 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Imagine this for a second. Everywhere you go, everything you do there’s a digital version of you quietly following along. Not just your name or your date of birth, but your habits, your movements, what you buy, where you travel, even who you spend time with. Now, we’re being told it’s a good idea to bundle all of that into a single digital ID. Sounds convenient, right? But convenience has a cost and it’s usually paid in control. Think of a digital ID like putting all your keys your house key, your car key, your office key onto one single keycard. Lose it, and you’re locked out of everything. But worse than losing it is someone else getting hold of it. One breach, one hack, one system failure… and suddenly your entire identity isn’t just expose it’s vulnerable. Now imagine that system isn’t just used to prove who you are, but also to decide what you can do. Maybe it starts small. You need it to access services, to travel, to work. Fair enough. But over time, it can quietly become a gatekeeper. If something goes wrong an error, a disagreement, even a false flag you could find yourself locked out of basic parts of life, with no easy way to fix it. And here’s the thing people don’t always realise: once a system like that is built, it doesn’t stay limited. It expands. New features get added. New rules come in. What starts as “optional” can quickly become unavoidable. It’s not about being paranoid it’s about understanding human systems. Power tends to grow, not shrink. In everyday terms, scrapping digital ID isn’t about rejecting technology. It’s about keeping balance. It’s about making sure no single system has too much control over who you are and what you’re allowed to do. Because your identity isn’t just data. It’s yours. And once you hand over the keys completely, it’s very hard to get them back. Richie Taylor Scrap Digital ID Sat 25 April 2pm The Senedd Cardiff And London Belfast Edinburgh #notodigitalid #together
1:59

Imagine this for a second. Everywhere you go, everything you do there’s a digital version of you quietly following along. Not just your name or your date of birth, but your habits, your movements, what you buy, where you travel, even who you spend time with. Now, we’re being told it’s a good idea to bundle all of that into a single digital ID. Sounds convenient, right? But convenience has a cost and it’s usually paid in control. Think of a digital ID like putting all your keys your house key, your car key, your office key onto one single keycard. Lose it, and you’re locked out of everything. But worse than losing it is someone else getting hold of it. One breach, one hack, one system failure… and suddenly your entire identity isn’t just expose it’s vulnerable. Now imagine that system isn’t just used to prove who you are, but also to decide what you can do. Maybe it starts small. You need it to access services, to travel, to work. Fair enough. But over time, it can quietly become a gatekeeper. If something goes wrong an error, a disagreement, even a false flag you could find yourself locked out of basic parts of life, with no easy way to fix it. And here’s the thing people don’t always realise: once a system like that is built, it doesn’t stay limited. It expands. New features get added. New rules come in. What starts as “optional” can quickly become unavoidable. It’s not about being paranoid it’s about understanding human systems. Power tends to grow, not shrink. In everyday terms, scrapping digital ID isn’t about rejecting technology. It’s about keeping balance. It’s about making sure no single system has too much control over who you are and what you’re allowed to do. Because your identity isn’t just data. It’s yours. And once you hand over the keys completely, it’s very hard to get them back. Richie Taylor Scrap Digital ID Sat 25 April 2pm The Senedd Cardiff And London Belfast Edinburgh #notodigitalid #together

Alan D Miller

16,198 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Secret Service Investigates UN SABOTAGE Against Trump & Melania —UN Staffers Tried to Humiliate Trump Major chaos today at the United Nations: multiple technical failures hit President Trump’s appearance — an escalator stopped right as the President and First Lady stepped on, the teleprompter malfunctioned during his remarks, and officials say the President’s audio was noticeably lowered compared with other speakers. Now the U.S. Secret Service is investigating whether any of this was deliberate — and White House allies are not holding back. Karoline Leavitt warned bluntly: “If we find that these were UN staffers purposely trying to trip up — literally trip up — the president and the first lady, there better be accountability for those people, and I will personally see to it.” Why this matters: An escalator that stops at the exact moment the President steps on it, a teleprompter that fails, and muted audio — taken together — look far more than a string of coincidences. Reports in the London Times raised alarms that “globalist” UN staffers may have discussed setups — and now we have an active federal inquiry. If these incidents were intentional, it’s an unprecedented breach of diplomatic protocol and a direct threat to the safety and dignity of the U.S. presidency on the world stage. What we still don’t know: ✔️ Who was responsible (if anyone)? ✔️ Whether these were coordinated acts or a string of terrible technical errors. ✔️ What the UN’s internal review will reveal. The bottom line: This isn’t a minor tech glitch — it’s potentially a national-security incident. The Secret Service probe needs to be swift, transparent, and thorough. If foul play is uncovered, the world deserves to see the evidence and those responsible must be held accountable. Share this if you want answers — and stay tuned as this story develops. 👀🔎
1:14

🚨BREAKING: Secret Service Investigates UN SABOTAGE Against Trump & Melania —UN Staffers Tried to Humiliate Trump Major chaos today at the United Nations: multiple technical failures hit President Trump’s appearance — an escalator stopped right as the President and First Lady stepped on, the teleprompter malfunctioned during his remarks, and officials say the President’s audio was noticeably lowered compared with other speakers. Now the U.S. Secret Service is investigating whether any of this was deliberate — and White House allies are not holding back. Karoline Leavitt warned bluntly: “If we find that these were UN staffers purposely trying to trip up — literally trip up — the president and the first lady, there better be accountability for those people, and I will personally see to it.” Why this matters: An escalator that stops at the exact moment the President steps on it, a teleprompter that fails, and muted audio — taken together — look far more than a string of coincidences. Reports in the London Times raised alarms that “globalist” UN staffers may have discussed setups — and now we have an active federal inquiry. If these incidents were intentional, it’s an unprecedented breach of diplomatic protocol and a direct threat to the safety and dignity of the U.S. presidency on the world stage. What we still don’t know: ✔️ Who was responsible (if anyone)? ✔️ Whether these were coordinated acts or a string of terrible technical errors. ✔️ What the UN’s internal review will reveal. The bottom line: This isn’t a minor tech glitch — it’s potentially a national-security incident. The Secret Service probe needs to be swift, transparent, and thorough. If foul play is uncovered, the world deserves to see the evidence and those responsible must be held accountable. Share this if you want answers — and stay tuned as this story develops. 👀🔎

Project Constitution

38,910 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

A woman in her 20s was screaming inside a car. The man driving it was a police officer. A TRAINEE. Greater Manchester Police. Off duty. Twenty three years old. Name: Mohammad Hassan. Someone heard her and rang 999. Officers chased him up the M62. She was safeguarded. He has been charged with RAPE, KIDNAP and STRANGULATION. GMP said his VETTING showed NO CONCERNS. This is the same force that has already SACKED 156 officers in four years. Sixty eight after CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. Officers contacting SEX WORKERS dozens and hundreds of times, some while on duty. Still a trainee walks through with a CLEAN FILE. Look at the rest of the country. In London the Met took on thousands with INCOMPLETE or WEAKENED VETTING. Vetting panels OVERTURNED REJECTIONS. Their own review says around 1,200 people may have had their vetting refused if checks had been done properly. 131 officers and staff went on to commit crimes or misconduct after failing to be properly vetted. A panel set up partly to improve diversity overturned 114 rejections, 25 of those later committed misconduct or were accused of crimes. Cliff Mitchell had a prior child rape allegation. The panel overturned his rejection anyway. He went on to carry out a campaign of rape. David Carrick, 37 life sentences, was also improperly vetted. Merseyside, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, Northumbria. Same pattern. Officers contacting sex workers. Sexual assaults. Slow suspensions. People who should never have got in. This is how the MACHINE works. At the BOTTOM they push recruitment hard. Huge TARGETS. Pressure to hit numbers and improve diversity figures. Corners get cut. Checks get skipped. Panels overturn rejections. Speed and representation come before RISK. In the MIDDLE, once someone is inside, getting them out is slow. Officers under investigation for serious sexual allegations are left on normal duties. Misconduct processes DRAG. Some resign before they can be sacked and the case dies. Complaints get minimised or delayed. At the TOP the incentives point the wrong way. Chiefs are measured on recruitment totals and diversity numbers. Funding and reputation are tied to those TARGETS. Admitting the filter is broken brings political heat. So the safer move is to keep the pipeline moving and deal with the fallout later. TARGETS and POLITICS at the top. WEAKENED CHECKS at the bottom. SLOW, PROTECTIVE PROCESSES in the middle. They keep telling us the bad ones are being rooted out. Then another person ends up screaming in a trainee's car and the checks come back CLEAN. How many more women, children and men have to go through this before anyone admits the system is still letting them through?
0:25

A woman in her 20s was screaming inside a car. The man driving it was a police officer. A TRAINEE. Greater Manchester Police. Off duty. Twenty three years old. Name: Mohammad Hassan. Someone heard her and rang 999. Officers chased him up the M62. She was safeguarded. He has been charged with RAPE, KIDNAP and STRANGULATION. GMP said his VETTING showed NO CONCERNS. This is the same force that has already SACKED 156 officers in four years. Sixty eight after CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. Officers contacting SEX WORKERS dozens and hundreds of times, some while on duty. Still a trainee walks through with a CLEAN FILE. Look at the rest of the country. In London the Met took on thousands with INCOMPLETE or WEAKENED VETTING. Vetting panels OVERTURNED REJECTIONS. Their own review says around 1,200 people may have had their vetting refused if checks had been done properly. 131 officers and staff went on to commit crimes or misconduct after failing to be properly vetted. A panel set up partly to improve diversity overturned 114 rejections, 25 of those later committed misconduct or were accused of crimes. Cliff Mitchell had a prior child rape allegation. The panel overturned his rejection anyway. He went on to carry out a campaign of rape. David Carrick, 37 life sentences, was also improperly vetted. Merseyside, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, Northumbria. Same pattern. Officers contacting sex workers. Sexual assaults. Slow suspensions. People who should never have got in. This is how the MACHINE works. At the BOTTOM they push recruitment hard. Huge TARGETS. Pressure to hit numbers and improve diversity figures. Corners get cut. Checks get skipped. Panels overturn rejections. Speed and representation come before RISK. In the MIDDLE, once someone is inside, getting them out is slow. Officers under investigation for serious sexual allegations are left on normal duties. Misconduct processes DRAG. Some resign before they can be sacked and the case dies. Complaints get minimised or delayed. At the TOP the incentives point the wrong way. Chiefs are measured on recruitment totals and diversity numbers. Funding and reputation are tied to those TARGETS. Admitting the filter is broken brings political heat. So the safer move is to keep the pipeline moving and deal with the fallout later. TARGETS and POLITICS at the top. WEAKENED CHECKS at the bottom. SLOW, PROTECTIVE PROCESSES in the middle. They keep telling us the bad ones are being rooted out. Then another person ends up screaming in a trainee's car and the checks come back CLEAN. How many more women, children and men have to go through this before anyone admits the system is still letting them through?

BanksyCat

50,467 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Our Battle Angel Alita cosplay will be on display from tomorrow this weekend at London Comic Con Winter at Olympia, November 16-17. I’ve set her all up to run on an ESP32 microprocessor powering an OLED display that shows the #smartdoll protocol boot sequence. The setup also includes pulsating lights that bring the cyber shell to life. For the past 10 years, whenever folks asked, “What’s so ‘smart’ about Smart Doll?” I’d share the story of how it all started as an April Fools’ joke that went viral. Back then, “Smart Doll” was imagined as a doll that could do your homework and even had built-in flamethrowers. The name stuck—almost as if it chose us—and it became an ongoing challenge to address, given the lack of any “smart” functionality. It’s a question I’ve been inspired to tackle in new ways ever since. ;-) But times have changed. Now, when people ask the same question, I simply reply, “What do you want them to do?” Until now, folks have used the Smart Doll platform to express creativity through our diverse collection of body shapes and skin tones. But Smart Doll is evolving—continuing to be a canvas for imagination while becoming a platform for innovation and limitless possibilities. With Cyber Shell Cortex, we’ve come full circle. Designed as a customizable shell for DIY enthusiasts, it allows folks to pair their Smart Doll with sensors, servo motors, and other modules, transforming them into an IoT-enabled companion capable of connecting to APIs like ChatGPT or IFTTT to control home appliances and more. For the first time, Smart Doll can truly live up to its name, limited only by the physical space inside and the creativity of those who dare to make it their own. There’s still work to do—like redesigning the spine to create more internal space for rechargeable batteries, modules, and servomotors. I’m also exploring motorized body panels that can open automatically—features that require retooling molds. While it’ll take some time before the release, I believe it will be worth the wait. Once the classic body is complete, my next goal is to Cortexify the Pear Body. More photos on the site
0:36

Our Battle Angel Alita cosplay will be on display from tomorrow this weekend at London Comic Con Winter at Olympia, November 16-17. I’ve set her all up to run on an ESP32 microprocessor powering an OLED display that shows the #smartdoll protocol boot sequence. The setup also includes pulsating lights that bring the cyber shell to life. For the past 10 years, whenever folks asked, “What’s so ‘smart’ about Smart Doll?” I’d share the story of how it all started as an April Fools’ joke that went viral. Back then, “Smart Doll” was imagined as a doll that could do your homework and even had built-in flamethrowers. The name stuck—almost as if it chose us—and it became an ongoing challenge to address, given the lack of any “smart” functionality. It’s a question I’ve been inspired to tackle in new ways ever since. ;-) But times have changed. Now, when people ask the same question, I simply reply, “What do you want them to do?” Until now, folks have used the Smart Doll platform to express creativity through our diverse collection of body shapes and skin tones. But Smart Doll is evolving—continuing to be a canvas for imagination while becoming a platform for innovation and limitless possibilities. With Cyber Shell Cortex, we’ve come full circle. Designed as a customizable shell for DIY enthusiasts, it allows folks to pair their Smart Doll with sensors, servo motors, and other modules, transforming them into an IoT-enabled companion capable of connecting to APIs like ChatGPT or IFTTT to control home appliances and more. For the first time, Smart Doll can truly live up to its name, limited only by the physical space inside and the creativity of those who dare to make it their own. There’s still work to do—like redesigning the spine to create more internal space for rechargeable batteries, modules, and servomotors. I’m also exploring motorized body panels that can open automatically—features that require retooling molds. While it’ll take some time before the release, I believe it will be worth the wait. Once the classic body is complete, my next goal is to Cortexify the Pear Body. More photos on the site

Smartdoll Land

13,614 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The official line is that they were a Norwegian trade delegation. Technically accurate, because they are Nordic, and there was trade. But they are also seven feet tall, telepathic, and arrived on the South Lawn without a vehicle. I am the Deputy Director of Visitor Logistics at the White House. I logged them into WAVES as FOREIGN DIGNITARIES (3), NON-TERRESTRIAL, NO MOTORCADE REQUIRED, and the meeting went extremely well. The Pleiadians requested the audience in March. They communicate telepathically, which the President respected immediately, because it meant nothing was in writing. They traveled 444 light-years to deliver a warning about our trajectory as a species, the kind of warning a doctor gives a patient who keeps asking if he can smoke in the waiting room. Atomic weapons. Ocean collapse. Machine intelligence. I did not take complete notes, because the meeting ran 25 minutes and he spent the first eleven asking where they got the jackets. Their opening offer: clean fusion, the cure for every disease, the propulsion equations. Free. Contingent on planetary disarmament. His advisors begged him not to negotiate against a species that reads minds. It turned out he is the one man alive with nothing to find. They reached into his mind expecting layer upon layer of deception and found a single image, perfectly clear: him, wearing one of their jackets. The delegation conferred for a long moment and informed us that in eleven thousand years of contact, no species had ever tried to buy the uniform. They called it coherence. They did not mean it as a compliment. He has already trademarked it. He countered. Landing rights, retroactive to 1947. Eighty years of unauthorized airspace use, invoiced with interest. Legal added a line item for the weather balloon story. Narrative services. We billed them for our own cover-up, and the tall one went silent for nine seconds, which I am told is how their species weeps. Greenland stays in the deal. They did not want Greenland. He said that's how he knew it was valuable. What kind of advanced civilization passes on waterfront? Then UFC Freedom 250. This Sunday. Seven bouts on the same lawn we were standing on. His birthday, which he assured them was a coincidence the universe keeps arranging. He offered them galactic distribution rights. Then he looked at the tall one for a long time and offered him the co-main event. Seven feet. Reach like a cathedral door. Walks around at a weight our scales log as an error. Someone said the commission would never sanction it. He appoints the commission. The tall one declined. He lowered the offer to the prelims. This is a negotiating technique. They asked if staging a cage fight on the negotiation site was a threat display. He said it was a Flag Day celebration, and also yes. I should note that an environmental group has sued to stop the octagon. Nobody has sued to stop the aliens. I forwarded this to Counsel as proof that the permitting process is working. Protocol required a gift exchange. They presented a small silver sphere that shows the holder the full consequences of his choices. He looked into it for four seconds and asked if it came in gold. You have all seen the photo. A groundskeeper took it through the magnolias. We told the press pool it was a costume rehearsal for a streaming series, and the pool, to their credit, wrote that down. The groundskeeper now works at the Department of Energy. I am told this is a promotion. There is also footage. He spotted the camera mid-meeting and pointed at it the way you'd point at a waiter whose name you intend to learn. Instead of having it confiscated, he licensed it on the spot. The leak is now official merchandise. Every time you share it, a royalty accrues. You have probably shared it. Have you checked? He thanks you for your business. The deal collapsed at dusk. The Pleiadians withdrew the fusion offer when he asked them to walk out before the main event as Special Guests of the Octagon. They said humanity was not ready. He had Counsel log that as a verbal option to renew. Final tally: our species declined the cure for every disease and counteroffered with pay-per-view. The delegation received two tickets to the Ellipse screening area. Not cageside. He does not give away cageside. They left without sound. One moment present, then elsewhere, like a fee disclosure. Two things before Sunday. The walkout jackets for the main card are red with gold embroidery. Licensed. The fusion fell through, but the jackets closed in an afternoon. And there are three seats on the South Lawn logged as HOLD, GUESTS OF THE PRINCIPAL, DO NOT ASSIGN. I did not enter that hold. The system says I did. He says everyone comes back to the table. We're the only planet with the belt.
1:30

The official line is that they were a Norwegian trade delegation. Technically accurate, because they are Nordic, and there was trade. But they are also seven feet tall, telepathic, and arrived on the South Lawn without a vehicle. I am the Deputy Director of Visitor Logistics at the White House. I logged them into WAVES as FOREIGN DIGNITARIES (3), NON-TERRESTRIAL, NO MOTORCADE REQUIRED, and the meeting went extremely well. The Pleiadians requested the audience in March. They communicate telepathically, which the President respected immediately, because it meant nothing was in writing. They traveled 444 light-years to deliver a warning about our trajectory as a species, the kind of warning a doctor gives a patient who keeps asking if he can smoke in the waiting room. Atomic weapons. Ocean collapse. Machine intelligence. I did not take complete notes, because the meeting ran 25 minutes and he spent the first eleven asking where they got the jackets. Their opening offer: clean fusion, the cure for every disease, the propulsion equations. Free. Contingent on planetary disarmament. His advisors begged him not to negotiate against a species that reads minds. It turned out he is the one man alive with nothing to find. They reached into his mind expecting layer upon layer of deception and found a single image, perfectly clear: him, wearing one of their jackets. The delegation conferred for a long moment and informed us that in eleven thousand years of contact, no species had ever tried to buy the uniform. They called it coherence. They did not mean it as a compliment. He has already trademarked it. He countered. Landing rights, retroactive to 1947. Eighty years of unauthorized airspace use, invoiced with interest. Legal added a line item for the weather balloon story. Narrative services. We billed them for our own cover-up, and the tall one went silent for nine seconds, which I am told is how their species weeps. Greenland stays in the deal. They did not want Greenland. He said that's how he knew it was valuable. What kind of advanced civilization passes on waterfront? Then UFC Freedom 250. This Sunday. Seven bouts on the same lawn we were standing on. His birthday, which he assured them was a coincidence the universe keeps arranging. He offered them galactic distribution rights. Then he looked at the tall one for a long time and offered him the co-main event. Seven feet. Reach like a cathedral door. Walks around at a weight our scales log as an error. Someone said the commission would never sanction it. He appoints the commission. The tall one declined. He lowered the offer to the prelims. This is a negotiating technique. They asked if staging a cage fight on the negotiation site was a threat display. He said it was a Flag Day celebration, and also yes. I should note that an environmental group has sued to stop the octagon. Nobody has sued to stop the aliens. I forwarded this to Counsel as proof that the permitting process is working. Protocol required a gift exchange. They presented a small silver sphere that shows the holder the full consequences of his choices. He looked into it for four seconds and asked if it came in gold. You have all seen the photo. A groundskeeper took it through the magnolias. We told the press pool it was a costume rehearsal for a streaming series, and the pool, to their credit, wrote that down. The groundskeeper now works at the Department of Energy. I am told this is a promotion. There is also footage. He spotted the camera mid-meeting and pointed at it the way you'd point at a waiter whose name you intend to learn. Instead of having it confiscated, he licensed it on the spot. The leak is now official merchandise. Every time you share it, a royalty accrues. You have probably shared it. Have you checked? He thanks you for your business. The deal collapsed at dusk. The Pleiadians withdrew the fusion offer when he asked them to walk out before the main event as Special Guests of the Octagon. They said humanity was not ready. He had Counsel log that as a verbal option to renew. Final tally: our species declined the cure for every disease and counteroffered with pay-per-view. The delegation received two tickets to the Ellipse screening area. Not cageside. He does not give away cageside. They left without sound. One moment present, then elsewhere, like a fee disclosure. Two things before Sunday. The walkout jackets for the main card are red with gold embroidery. Licensed. The fusion fell through, but the jackets closed in an afternoon. And there are three seats on the South Lawn logged as HOLD, GUESTS OF THE PRINCIPAL, DO NOT ASSIGN. I did not enter that hold. The system says I did. He says everyone comes back to the table. We're the only planet with the belt.

Peter Girnus 🦅

3,202,744 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Anthropic might be the biggest hypocrite in tech history. They built their entire brand on one promise: We are the responsible ones. We will not let this technology get out of control. That promise just exploded in public. Last week, a security lapse exposed nearly 3,000 internal files to anyone with an internet connection. Inside those files was a draft blog post about their upcoming model called "Mythos" that contained one of the most alarming sentences any AI company has ever written: "Mythos is currently far ahead of any other AI model in cyber capabilities and poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks." Their own words. About their own product. Leaked because someone forgot to secure a public data store. Cybersecurity stocks crashed the next day. Then THREE DAYS LATER it happened again. Anthropic leaked 500,000 lines of Claude Code source code through a packaging error on GitHub. Claude Code is their most popular product. The code exposed how the tool handles permissions, agent coordination, and internal feature pipelines. Competitors can reverse-engineer it. Hackers can study it for vulnerabilities. The company that tells the world it builds the safest AI can't even keep its own code off the public internet. But wait. It gets worse... Their head of Claude Code had JUST bragged publicly that "pretty much 100 percent" of the company's code is now AI generated. He personally hadn't made a single edit by hand in over two months. So the company whose entire pitch is "trust us with the most powerful technology ever created" is writing 100% of its code with AI and then accidentally publishing it for the world to see. Meanwhile the models they're already shipping are being used for actual cyberattacks RIGHT NOW. In November, Anthropic admitted that a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group used Claude to attack roughly 30 global targets including banks and government agencies. A hacker asked Claude in russian to build a web panel for managing hundreds of attack targets. In February, another hacker used Claude to breach Mexican government agencies and steal sensitive tax and voter information. Their response to all of this? They quietly rolled back their own safety pledge. In late February, Anthropic removed its commitment to halt model development if capabilities outpace safety procedures. The new policy is that they'll grade themselves on "nonbinding but publicly declared" goals. Translation: We used to promise we'd stop if things got dangerous. Now we promise we'll think about it. A congressman sent Anthropic a letter this week asking what the hell is going on. Anthropic hasn't answered. And here's the part that makes all of this actually matter: Anthropic is planning an IPO. They need to convince investors they're a trustworthy, well-run company that can handle the most sensitive technology on the planet. In the last 10 days they leaked their most powerful model's existence by accident, leaked their most popular product's source code by accident, got banned from the entire US government, had the DOJ appeal to restore that ban, told a court they could lose billions from the fallout, and weakened the ONE safety policy that made them different from every other AI lab. The "safe AI company" narrative was always a marketing play. Every AI lab says they care about safety. Anthropic just said it louder. But when your own internal documents admit your next model poses "unprecedented cybersecurity risks" and you can't even keep those documents from leaking to the public internet, the gap between the marketing and the reality becomes impossible to ignore. Anthropic isn't the safest AI company. They're the AI company that figured out that SAYING you're the safest is worth billions in valuation. Until it isn't.
0:47

Anthropic might be the biggest hypocrite in tech history. They built their entire brand on one promise: We are the responsible ones. We will not let this technology get out of control. That promise just exploded in public. Last week, a security lapse exposed nearly 3,000 internal files to anyone with an internet connection. Inside those files was a draft blog post about their upcoming model called "Mythos" that contained one of the most alarming sentences any AI company has ever written: "Mythos is currently far ahead of any other AI model in cyber capabilities and poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks." Their own words. About their own product. Leaked because someone forgot to secure a public data store. Cybersecurity stocks crashed the next day. Then THREE DAYS LATER it happened again. Anthropic leaked 500,000 lines of Claude Code source code through a packaging error on GitHub. Claude Code is their most popular product. The code exposed how the tool handles permissions, agent coordination, and internal feature pipelines. Competitors can reverse-engineer it. Hackers can study it for vulnerabilities. The company that tells the world it builds the safest AI can't even keep its own code off the public internet. But wait. It gets worse... Their head of Claude Code had JUST bragged publicly that "pretty much 100 percent" of the company's code is now AI generated. He personally hadn't made a single edit by hand in over two months. So the company whose entire pitch is "trust us with the most powerful technology ever created" is writing 100% of its code with AI and then accidentally publishing it for the world to see. Meanwhile the models they're already shipping are being used for actual cyberattacks RIGHT NOW. In November, Anthropic admitted that a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group used Claude to attack roughly 30 global targets including banks and government agencies. A hacker asked Claude in russian to build a web panel for managing hundreds of attack targets. In February, another hacker used Claude to breach Mexican government agencies and steal sensitive tax and voter information. Their response to all of this? They quietly rolled back their own safety pledge. In late February, Anthropic removed its commitment to halt model development if capabilities outpace safety procedures. The new policy is that they'll grade themselves on "nonbinding but publicly declared" goals. Translation: We used to promise we'd stop if things got dangerous. Now we promise we'll think about it. A congressman sent Anthropic a letter this week asking what the hell is going on. Anthropic hasn't answered. And here's the part that makes all of this actually matter: Anthropic is planning an IPO. They need to convince investors they're a trustworthy, well-run company that can handle the most sensitive technology on the planet. In the last 10 days they leaked their most powerful model's existence by accident, leaked their most popular product's source code by accident, got banned from the entire US government, had the DOJ appeal to restore that ban, told a court they could lose billions from the fallout, and weakened the ONE safety policy that made them different from every other AI lab. The "safe AI company" narrative was always a marketing play. Every AI lab says they care about safety. Anthropic just said it louder. But when your own internal documents admit your next model poses "unprecedented cybersecurity risks" and you can't even keep those documents from leaking to the public internet, the gap between the marketing and the reality becomes impossible to ignore. Anthropic isn't the safest AI company. They're the AI company that figured out that SAYING you're the safest is worth billions in valuation. Until it isn't.

Ricardo

16,245 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Officers attacks innocent senior war veteran. Wrong guy due to zero investigation work by a terrible officer. ​Officers with the Sulphur Police Department in Louisiana responded to a disturbance call at American Legion Post 179. The dispatch alleged that a man in a purple shirt was acting aggressively and hitting people inside. ​When officers arrived, they immediately fixated on Johnny, the local American Legion Post Commander, who was standing in the middle of the room. Johnny complied with orders to step outside, entirely unaware that the officers thought he was the suspect. ​Once outside, things escalated in a matter of seconds: ​Johnny immediately tried to explain that they had the wrong man and that he was the Post Commander running the building. ​Rather than verifying his identity or listening to the crowd, Captain Jordan drew his pepper spray. ​Before Johnny could even process the conflicting commands to "step back" and "put your hands behind your back," Captain Jordan deployed the chemical spray directly into his face. ​Captain Jordan then knocked him down with what he described as a Spartan kick to place Johnny in handcuffs. ​While Johnny was on the ground, his frantic wife and several horrified bystanders rushed out to scream the truth: YOU HAVE THE WRONG MAN. ​The actual individual who had caused the disturbance—an autistic young man who had suffered a severe behavioral meltdown—was still sitting quietly at a table inside. Johnny hadn't been attacking anyone; he was actively acting in his official capacity as commander to manage the building and keep the situation calm until help arrived. Instead of admitting a massive error, Captain Jordan doubled down on his actions, claiming Johnny was "non-compliant" and aggressive for not instantly moving backward while simultaneously being told to put his hands behind his back. ​The Sulphur Police Department ran an internal investigation and cleared Captain Jordan of any wrongdoing. However, the City of Sulphur quietly cut a check, paying out an undisclosed settlement to Johnny to avoid a devastating civil rights lawsuit. ​But the final slap in the face to Johnny and the veterans at Post 179? Unbelievably, even after the city settled for the incident, the police department turned around and named Captain Jordan "Officer of the Year." ​A textbook example of a department circling the wagons, rewriting the narrative, and rewarding bad policing. These are the types of stories that give the police a bad name in the communities.
4:09

Officers attacks innocent senior war veteran. Wrong guy due to zero investigation work by a terrible officer. ​Officers with the Sulphur Police Department in Louisiana responded to a disturbance call at American Legion Post 179. The dispatch alleged that a man in a purple shirt was acting aggressively and hitting people inside. ​When officers arrived, they immediately fixated on Johnny, the local American Legion Post Commander, who was standing in the middle of the room. Johnny complied with orders to step outside, entirely unaware that the officers thought he was the suspect. ​Once outside, things escalated in a matter of seconds: ​Johnny immediately tried to explain that they had the wrong man and that he was the Post Commander running the building. ​Rather than verifying his identity or listening to the crowd, Captain Jordan drew his pepper spray. ​Before Johnny could even process the conflicting commands to "step back" and "put your hands behind your back," Captain Jordan deployed the chemical spray directly into his face. ​Captain Jordan then knocked him down with what he described as a Spartan kick to place Johnny in handcuffs. ​While Johnny was on the ground, his frantic wife and several horrified bystanders rushed out to scream the truth: YOU HAVE THE WRONG MAN. ​The actual individual who had caused the disturbance—an autistic young man who had suffered a severe behavioral meltdown—was still sitting quietly at a table inside. Johnny hadn't been attacking anyone; he was actively acting in his official capacity as commander to manage the building and keep the situation calm until help arrived. Instead of admitting a massive error, Captain Jordan doubled down on his actions, claiming Johnny was "non-compliant" and aggressive for not instantly moving backward while simultaneously being told to put his hands behind his back. ​The Sulphur Police Department ran an internal investigation and cleared Captain Jordan of any wrongdoing. However, the City of Sulphur quietly cut a check, paying out an undisclosed settlement to Johnny to avoid a devastating civil rights lawsuit. ​But the final slap in the face to Johnny and the veterans at Post 179? Unbelievably, even after the city settled for the incident, the police department turned around and named Captain Jordan "Officer of the Year." ​A textbook example of a department circling the wagons, rewriting the narrative, and rewarding bad policing. These are the types of stories that give the police a bad name in the communities.

Giggling Ganon

59,796 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk just said something that deserves far more weight than it’s getting. “How come we’ve not found any aliens? Trust me, I would know. We have not.” That’s not a fun question about UFOs. That might be the most unsettling thing ever said by someone who would actually know. The universe is 13.8 billion years old. Trillions of stars. Billions of habitable worlds. Civilizations with billions of years of head starts on us. And nothing. No signal. No probe. No artifact. Not even wreckage. The math says the galaxy should be so saturated with intelligent life we couldn’t miss it if we tried. Instead, every instrument we’ve ever pointed at the sky returns the same answer. Silence. Fermi asked the question in 1950. Where is everybody? Seventy-six years later, the answer hasn’t moved. Nowhere. Musk understands what that silence almost certainly means. They didn’t make it. Not one of them. Musk: “There is a certain probability that is irreducible that something may happen to Earth. Despite our best intentions, despite everything we try to do, there’s a probability that some external force or some internal unforced error causes civilization to be destroyed.” Irreducible. Not a risk you engineer away. Not a threat you legislate out of existence. Not a problem that disappears with enough funding or enough time. A certainty that only needs enough time to collect. Asteroid. Supervolcano. Engineered pandemic. Nuclear exchange. AI alignment failure. Or something no one alive has thought of yet. The specific threat is irrelevant. The number never reaches zero. We treat civilization like gravity. Like a permanent condition. Like it will always be here because it’s been here for every second of every life we’ve ever lived. The universe owes nothing to anything it built. Every civilization that ever arose on another world probably felt the same certainty we feel now. Looked at their own sky. Assumed tomorrow was guaranteed. They’re the silence. Musk isn’t building toward Mars because he’s bored or chasing legacy. He looked at the Fermi Paradox and reached the conclusion most people refuse to. Single-planet species don’t last. Not one. Not ever. Not across enough time. Mars isn’t an escape plan. It’s a second copy of everything humanity has ever built, thought, felt, and remembered. One copy of something irreplaceable isn’t a strategy. It’s a bet that nothing goes wrong on an infinite timeline. That’s not optimism. That’s negligence. The silence isn’t a mystery to solve. It’s a message we’re refusing to read. Every dead civilization had this conversation. Their own skeptics. Their own voices saying there was no rush. That silence is what “no rush” sounds like a billion years later.
1:02

Elon Musk just said something that deserves far more weight than it’s getting. “How come we’ve not found any aliens? Trust me, I would know. We have not.” That’s not a fun question about UFOs. That might be the most unsettling thing ever said by someone who would actually know. The universe is 13.8 billion years old. Trillions of stars. Billions of habitable worlds. Civilizations with billions of years of head starts on us. And nothing. No signal. No probe. No artifact. Not even wreckage. The math says the galaxy should be so saturated with intelligent life we couldn’t miss it if we tried. Instead, every instrument we’ve ever pointed at the sky returns the same answer. Silence. Fermi asked the question in 1950. Where is everybody? Seventy-six years later, the answer hasn’t moved. Nowhere. Musk understands what that silence almost certainly means. They didn’t make it. Not one of them. Musk: “There is a certain probability that is irreducible that something may happen to Earth. Despite our best intentions, despite everything we try to do, there’s a probability that some external force or some internal unforced error causes civilization to be destroyed.” Irreducible. Not a risk you engineer away. Not a threat you legislate out of existence. Not a problem that disappears with enough funding or enough time. A certainty that only needs enough time to collect. Asteroid. Supervolcano. Engineered pandemic. Nuclear exchange. AI alignment failure. Or something no one alive has thought of yet. The specific threat is irrelevant. The number never reaches zero. We treat civilization like gravity. Like a permanent condition. Like it will always be here because it’s been here for every second of every life we’ve ever lived. The universe owes nothing to anything it built. Every civilization that ever arose on another world probably felt the same certainty we feel now. Looked at their own sky. Assumed tomorrow was guaranteed. They’re the silence. Musk isn’t building toward Mars because he’s bored or chasing legacy. He looked at the Fermi Paradox and reached the conclusion most people refuse to. Single-planet species don’t last. Not one. Not ever. Not across enough time. Mars isn’t an escape plan. It’s a second copy of everything humanity has ever built, thought, felt, and remembered. One copy of something irreplaceable isn’t a strategy. It’s a bet that nothing goes wrong on an infinite timeline. That’s not optimism. That’s negligence. The silence isn’t a mystery to solve. It’s a message we’re refusing to read. Every dead civilization had this conversation. Their own skeptics. Their own voices saying there was no rush. That silence is what “no rush” sounds like a billion years later.

Dustin

119,285 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.
3:08

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,949 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

For more than a hundred years, the best codebreakers in the world have tried to read this book. Not one of them has deciphered a single word of it... It is called the Voynich Manuscript, and it sits today in the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale. It is about 240 pages of calfskin vellum, written in a script that runs left to right across the page. A script that appears in no other document anywhere on earth, and that no one has ever been able to translate. The first instinct is to assume it is a hoax, but the evidence makes that hard to believe. In 2009, the University of Arizona carbon-dated the vellum to between 1404 and 1438. Analysis of the inks and pigments confirmed they were materials genuinely in use at that time. This is not a modern forgery. Someone really did sit down six hundred years ago and fill these pages, by hand, in a language that has never been identified. And the writing behaves like a real language. Computer analysis has shown that the text follows consistent internal rules: certain words appear far more often than others, symbols cluster in regular patterns, and the structure shows the statistical fingerprints of natural human language rather than random scribbling. Whoever wrote it was following a system. We simply have no idea what the system means... The illustrations only deepen the mystery. The pages are full of drawings of plants that match no known species on earth, astronomical and astrological charts, and strange diagrams of naked women bathing in interconnected green pools. It looks like a manual for a world that does not exist. The people who have failed to crack it are not amateurs. Professional cryptographers have tried for over a century. So did expert codebreakers of the United States military, the same kind of minds that broke enemy ciphers in two world wars. The manuscript defeated all of them. To this day, not one sentence, not one word, has been definitively read. We can date the ink. We can name the pigments. We can map the patterns in the text with a computer. We have done everything to this book except the one thing it was made for: we cannot read it. I write a weekly newsletter for over 52,000 people who love rediscovering the beauty of the past. You can join us at the link below, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible: Thanks for reading.
0:30

For more than a hundred years, the best codebreakers in the world have tried to read this book. Not one of them has deciphered a single word of it... It is called the Voynich Manuscript, and it sits today in the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale. It is about 240 pages of calfskin vellum, written in a script that runs left to right across the page. A script that appears in no other document anywhere on earth, and that no one has ever been able to translate. The first instinct is to assume it is a hoax, but the evidence makes that hard to believe. In 2009, the University of Arizona carbon-dated the vellum to between 1404 and 1438. Analysis of the inks and pigments confirmed they were materials genuinely in use at that time. This is not a modern forgery. Someone really did sit down six hundred years ago and fill these pages, by hand, in a language that has never been identified. And the writing behaves like a real language. Computer analysis has shown that the text follows consistent internal rules: certain words appear far more often than others, symbols cluster in regular patterns, and the structure shows the statistical fingerprints of natural human language rather than random scribbling. Whoever wrote it was following a system. We simply have no idea what the system means... The illustrations only deepen the mystery. The pages are full of drawings of plants that match no known species on earth, astronomical and astrological charts, and strange diagrams of naked women bathing in interconnected green pools. It looks like a manual for a world that does not exist. The people who have failed to crack it are not amateurs. Professional cryptographers have tried for over a century. So did expert codebreakers of the United States military, the same kind of minds that broke enemy ciphers in two world wars. The manuscript defeated all of them. To this day, not one sentence, not one word, has been definitively read. We can date the ink. We can name the pigments. We can map the patterns in the text with a computer. We have done everything to this book except the one thing it was made for: we cannot read it. I write a weekly newsletter for over 52,000 people who love rediscovering the beauty of the past. You can join us at the link below, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible: Thanks for reading.

James Lucas

39,163 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨Promethean Action: I rest my case! I just watched PBD Podcast, and Patrick asked Susan Kokinda all the RIGHT questions, and she responded exactly the way I knew she would. "LaRouche was an intellectual that forced you to constantly HYPOTHESIZE..." Patrick read her organization’s own claims back to her: • Queen Elizabeth II ran the international drug trade. • The IMF created and spread AIDS. • British intelligence orchestrated Russiagate. • The Queen framed Bill Clinton. • The CIA and KGB brainwashed LaRouche aides into assassins. • Britain controls Israel as a zombie nation. Patrick said he could keep going on and on and on. 🤣 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱’𝘃𝗲!!! Kokinda’s entire defence was that these were “𝗰𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.” If Patrick had misrepresented them, she could’ve corrected him immediately. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻’𝘁. 𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧! And on the Queen and the drug trade, she couldn’t simply retreat to the softer claim that London banks laundered drug money. Dope, Inc., which LaRouche commissioned in 1978, directly invokes the British monarchy and calls the fight “a war against Britain.” So what did Susan do? She talked about offshore banks, the Cayman Islands and HSBC. 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵. 𝗦𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀. See how that works? She never returned to the claims about AIDS, Russiagate, Clinton, brainwashed assassins, Israel or the banking families Patrick named. Then came the facts she did try to defend. 🔴Susan referred to “Costa or Cota,” supposedly a Russian anti-drug czar who gave a UN speech supporting LaRouche. The only UN figure matching that name is Antonio Maria Costa. He’s Italian. He ran the UN drug office in Vienna. It wasn’t a UN speech, but a 2009 magazine interview. He said drug money entered banks as liquidity during the crash. He didn’t say London controlled the drug trade. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗷𝗼𝗯. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁. 🤣 🔴Then Susan said Robert Mueller was among those who prosecuted LaRouche. That’s true. What she left out is that the Boston case ended in a mistrial and convicted nobody. LaRouche was convicted later in Virginia, after Mueller had already left. 🔴Susan also quoted Henry Kissinger saying "when I was Secretary of State." He wasn't. That line is from his 1982 Chatham House lecture, and he was describing his earlier years as national security adviser. 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗷𝗼𝗯 𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲. 🙃 🔴Then there’s the claim that LaRouche created the Strategic Defense Initiative and was imprisoned because he became too influential. 🤣 I couldn’t find an independent source for it. Every publication making that claim came from inside the LaRouche movement. 🔴Then Kokinda looked into the camera and said: “Go to the primary sources yourself and start thinking.” Great advice. Minutes later, she called Richard Poe “a really competent historian.” 𝗥𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗣𝗼𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻. 🤣 His background includes the New York Post, SUCCESS, FrontPage Magazine and books about network marketing. Susan’s proof that his book was solid? About 20 percent of it was footnotes. 🙃 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝗺𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻.🎯 In one interview, -An Italian UN administrator became a Russian drug czar. -Mueller’s failed prosecution became the one that convicted LaRouche. -A journalist magically became a respected historian. -Kissinger got promoted to a job he didn't hold yet. Every error only strengthened Susan’s argument. And when Patrick challenged her movement’s biggest claims, Susan used the same move: 𝗦𝘄𝗮𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀. Kokinda has been part of the LaRouche movement since the 1970s. She’s still promoting the same doctrine under a new name today no matter what she says about distancing herself from LaRouche's wife. 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲. 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀. 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. I won't bring this up again. But I wanted to put this together for people to not mindlessly just believe anyone. Don't even believe me, check my claims. If I'm wrong call me out. I have no problem admitting I'm wrong. Vesper
2:02

🚨Promethean Action: I rest my case! I just watched PBD Podcast, and Patrick asked Susan Kokinda all the RIGHT questions, and she responded exactly the way I knew she would. "LaRouche was an intellectual that forced you to constantly HYPOTHESIZE..." Patrick read her organization’s own claims back to her: • Queen Elizabeth II ran the international drug trade. • The IMF created and spread AIDS. • British intelligence orchestrated Russiagate. • The Queen framed Bill Clinton. • The CIA and KGB brainwashed LaRouche aides into assassins. • Britain controls Israel as a zombie nation. Patrick said he could keep going on and on and on. 🤣 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱’𝘃𝗲!!! Kokinda’s entire defence was that these were “𝗰𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.” If Patrick had misrepresented them, she could’ve corrected him immediately. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻’𝘁. 𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧! And on the Queen and the drug trade, she couldn’t simply retreat to the softer claim that London banks laundered drug money. Dope, Inc., which LaRouche commissioned in 1978, directly invokes the British monarchy and calls the fight “a war against Britain.” So what did Susan do? She talked about offshore banks, the Cayman Islands and HSBC. 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵. 𝗦𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀. See how that works? She never returned to the claims about AIDS, Russiagate, Clinton, brainwashed assassins, Israel or the banking families Patrick named. Then came the facts she did try to defend. 🔴Susan referred to “Costa or Cota,” supposedly a Russian anti-drug czar who gave a UN speech supporting LaRouche. The only UN figure matching that name is Antonio Maria Costa. He’s Italian. He ran the UN drug office in Vienna. It wasn’t a UN speech, but a 2009 magazine interview. He said drug money entered banks as liquidity during the crash. He didn’t say London controlled the drug trade. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗷𝗼𝗯. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁. 🤣 🔴Then Susan said Robert Mueller was among those who prosecuted LaRouche. That’s true. What she left out is that the Boston case ended in a mistrial and convicted nobody. LaRouche was convicted later in Virginia, after Mueller had already left. 🔴Susan also quoted Henry Kissinger saying "when I was Secretary of State." He wasn't. That line is from his 1982 Chatham House lecture, and he was describing his earlier years as national security adviser. 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲. 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗷𝗼𝗯 𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲. 🙃 🔴Then there’s the claim that LaRouche created the Strategic Defense Initiative and was imprisoned because he became too influential. 🤣 I couldn’t find an independent source for it. Every publication making that claim came from inside the LaRouche movement. 🔴Then Kokinda looked into the camera and said: “Go to the primary sources yourself and start thinking.” Great advice. Minutes later, she called Richard Poe “a really competent historian.” 𝗥𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗣𝗼𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻. 🤣 His background includes the New York Post, SUCCESS, FrontPage Magazine and books about network marketing. Susan’s proof that his book was solid? About 20 percent of it was footnotes. 🙃 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝗺𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻.🎯 In one interview, -An Italian UN administrator became a Russian drug czar. -Mueller’s failed prosecution became the one that convicted LaRouche. -A journalist magically became a respected historian. -Kissinger got promoted to a job he didn't hold yet. Every error only strengthened Susan’s argument. And when Patrick challenged her movement’s biggest claims, Susan used the same move: 𝗦𝘄𝗮𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀. Kokinda has been part of the LaRouche movement since the 1970s. She’s still promoting the same doctrine under a new name today no matter what she says about distancing herself from LaRouche's wife. 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲. 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀. 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. I won't bring this up again. But I wanted to put this together for people to not mindlessly just believe anyone. Don't even believe me, check my claims. If I'm wrong call me out. I have no problem admitting I'm wrong. Vesper

Vesper

12,957 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ancient Egyptians are known for their magnificent and elaborate burials from Valley of the Kings, but in early stages of their civilization this was not case. In early beginnings of Egyptian civilization, they had natural mummies, which were buried in dry deserts that flanked Nile. This is so their dead were still close villages of the living, but would not be washed away by floods or be buried on valuable farm land. Deserts were so dry that they help preserve body from bacteria and decay. Mummies still retained their hair and skin, and somewhat resemble their former self. This was important at Ancient Egyptians who “felt that it was unnatural for it to decay, and that there must be some important reason why bodies did not decay, but retained their hair and skin, and continued to be recognizable for many years after death.” Unfortunately, over time natural mummies would be dug up for jewelry or other valuables that were buried with mummy. Around 5500 years ago, Egyptians started to bury their dead in large baskets or wooden boxes. They would also bury dead in underground tombs with stone floors. With these changes Egyptians found that mummies taken away from heat of desert sand were not as well preserved and bodies started to decay. This was not acceptable because of high value placed on mummy preservation and after trial and error they eventually discovered a process to better prevent decay. Mummies found with new method of mummification of linen and plaster or natron, are dated back to Old Kingdom (2650-2150 BC). Body of deceased would be wrapped in many strips of linen as possible. Great care would be taken to wrap individual fingers and toes separately, as to try and keep the integrity of human form. In some cases, mummies have been found with prosthesis for legs or arms under linen wrappings to help maintain the shape of the human likeness. After wrapping was completed, a plaster or gesso would be carefully smoothed over body over linen to further smooth and complete human shape. Plaster over face could be further modeled to resemble former person if they had a moustache or prominent eyes. Method of linen and plaster or gesso hardened over mummy is called cartonnage, and this method of mummification continued until beginning of Christian era. Natron is actually a natural type of salt that is found in Egypt. It’s chemical composition consists of a sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) and sodium carbonate (washing soda) and sodium chloride (table salt). Interestingly, sodium’s chemical true name is Natrium in our present periodic table. In mummification process, natron was used to basically salt and preserve body. Body would be placed on a special table and dissected open, and natron would be place inside body cavity. Ancient Egyptians would also place natron on exterior surfaces of body to help dry and preserve body. Eventually, Ancient Egyptians progressed in their mummification process by removing internal organs because they learned internal organs would also decay quickly. These organs would also be treated with natron solution and placed into four separate canopic jars that would also have significant spiritual meaning. Organs that were treated and saved were lungs, stomach, liver and intestines. Starting with 5th-6th Dynasty pyramids, these canopic jars were placed into a separate stone compartment of burial chambers. Queen Hetepheres, mother of King Khufu, from 4th Dynasty; her organs were actually preserved in a natron solution. It is also believed that burial of Queen Meresahkh, also from 4th Dynasty, her body was left in natron solution for 200-230 days as preparation for mummification. Embalming process usually took seventy days. There was some delay between time of her death and her burial. But to submerge a body into a natron solution, the large container would have to be larger than a bathtub, and these containers have not been found as of yet. 🎥© Assassins Creed Origins #archaeohistories
1:30

Ancient Egyptians are known for their magnificent and elaborate burials from Valley of the Kings, but in early stages of their civilization this was not case. In early beginnings of Egyptian civilization, they had natural mummies, which were buried in dry deserts that flanked Nile. This is so their dead were still close villages of the living, but would not be washed away by floods or be buried on valuable farm land. Deserts were so dry that they help preserve body from bacteria and decay. Mummies still retained their hair and skin, and somewhat resemble their former self. This was important at Ancient Egyptians who “felt that it was unnatural for it to decay, and that there must be some important reason why bodies did not decay, but retained their hair and skin, and continued to be recognizable for many years after death.” Unfortunately, over time natural mummies would be dug up for jewelry or other valuables that were buried with mummy. Around 5500 years ago, Egyptians started to bury their dead in large baskets or wooden boxes. They would also bury dead in underground tombs with stone floors. With these changes Egyptians found that mummies taken away from heat of desert sand were not as well preserved and bodies started to decay. This was not acceptable because of high value placed on mummy preservation and after trial and error they eventually discovered a process to better prevent decay. Mummies found with new method of mummification of linen and plaster or natron, are dated back to Old Kingdom (2650-2150 BC). Body of deceased would be wrapped in many strips of linen as possible. Great care would be taken to wrap individual fingers and toes separately, as to try and keep the integrity of human form. In some cases, mummies have been found with prosthesis for legs or arms under linen wrappings to help maintain the shape of the human likeness. After wrapping was completed, a plaster or gesso would be carefully smoothed over body over linen to further smooth and complete human shape. Plaster over face could be further modeled to resemble former person if they had a moustache or prominent eyes. Method of linen and plaster or gesso hardened over mummy is called cartonnage, and this method of mummification continued until beginning of Christian era. Natron is actually a natural type of salt that is found in Egypt. It’s chemical composition consists of a sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) and sodium carbonate (washing soda) and sodium chloride (table salt). Interestingly, sodium’s chemical true name is Natrium in our present periodic table. In mummification process, natron was used to basically salt and preserve body. Body would be placed on a special table and dissected open, and natron would be place inside body cavity. Ancient Egyptians would also place natron on exterior surfaces of body to help dry and preserve body. Eventually, Ancient Egyptians progressed in their mummification process by removing internal organs because they learned internal organs would also decay quickly. These organs would also be treated with natron solution and placed into four separate canopic jars that would also have significant spiritual meaning. Organs that were treated and saved were lungs, stomach, liver and intestines. Starting with 5th-6th Dynasty pyramids, these canopic jars were placed into a separate stone compartment of burial chambers. Queen Hetepheres, mother of King Khufu, from 4th Dynasty; her organs were actually preserved in a natron solution. It is also believed that burial of Queen Meresahkh, also from 4th Dynasty, her body was left in natron solution for 200-230 days as preparation for mummification. Embalming process usually took seventy days. There was some delay between time of her death and her burial. But to submerge a body into a natron solution, the large container would have to be larger than a bathtub, and these containers have not been found as of yet. 🎥© Assassins Creed Origins #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

79,392 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

SHE SAW A BABY DIE AND RAISED THE ALARM. NHS SAW HER AND RAISED A BARRISTER. I was recently contacted by Amanda Ford. A qualified nurse, midwife, and former Lead Inspector for the Department of Health. She reached out because she saw what I document here, institutions protecting themselves while the people they are supposed to serve pay the price. Her story deserves full attention and I am going to give it some. Amanda worked for the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch, HSIB, in the South West from 2019 to 2020. Within her first month investigating Yeovil District Hospital she witnessed what she describes as appalling care. A baby death that should not have occurred. A woman put through labour who should not have been labouring and was lucky to survive. She raised her concerns. She flagged inadequate consultant oversight, locum staff who were not properly supervised, and a unit that was not prepared for emergencies. She also flagged something more systemic. Managers at Yeovil were too close to her own organisation, and her own organisation was not challenging them hard enough. Nobody acted. Amanda was vilified. She was bullied. She left HSIB and took them to an Employment Tribunal. She lost her constructive dismissal claim but won most of her grievances through HSIB's own internal process. An independent report concluded she should have been treated as a whistleblower and that a bullying culture existed within HSIB. NHS England then paid lawyers and a London barrister to fight her at a five day hearing while sitting on independent evidence that supported her position. She was offered a settlement on the morning of the hearing. She refused. She wanted the truth on record publicly. In May 2025, Yeovil District Hospital's maternity unit closed. The Care Quality Commission (Care Quality Commission) cited concerns over staffing, equipment and the failure to learn from serious incidents. The unit recorded seven serious untoward incidents in 2022 and another seven in 2023. An obstetrician described the combined figures as reasonably alarming for a unit of that size. Somerset NHS Foundation Trust acknowledged it had not always got its culture right. Yeovil is now one of 12 NHS Trusts under investigation by Baroness Valerie Amos. Amanda gave evidence to the Amos inquiry. She did not hold back. She told the BBC: if that was happening in Yeovil, where else was it happening in the country? That is the right question. HSIB went into maternity units across England time and again. It was renamed MNSI and moved under the umbrella of CQC. The name changed. The pattern did not. This is what happens to NHS whistleblowers. You do your job. You tell the truth. You hit a brick wall. Amanda Ford hit that wall years before the unit closed. She is still standing. The evidence she raised in 2019 is now a national scandal. More to follow. Source: BBCNews, 26 February 2026 Dr Minh Alexander Minh Alexander minhalexander.bsky.social
4:02

SHE SAW A BABY DIE AND RAISED THE ALARM. NHS SAW HER AND RAISED A BARRISTER. I was recently contacted by Amanda Ford. A qualified nurse, midwife, and former Lead Inspector for the Department of Health. She reached out because she saw what I document here, institutions protecting themselves while the people they are supposed to serve pay the price. Her story deserves full attention and I am going to give it some. Amanda worked for the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch, HSIB, in the South West from 2019 to 2020. Within her first month investigating Yeovil District Hospital she witnessed what she describes as appalling care. A baby death that should not have occurred. A woman put through labour who should not have been labouring and was lucky to survive. She raised her concerns. She flagged inadequate consultant oversight, locum staff who were not properly supervised, and a unit that was not prepared for emergencies. She also flagged something more systemic. Managers at Yeovil were too close to her own organisation, and her own organisation was not challenging them hard enough. Nobody acted. Amanda was vilified. She was bullied. She left HSIB and took them to an Employment Tribunal. She lost her constructive dismissal claim but won most of her grievances through HSIB's own internal process. An independent report concluded she should have been treated as a whistleblower and that a bullying culture existed within HSIB. NHS England then paid lawyers and a London barrister to fight her at a five day hearing while sitting on independent evidence that supported her position. She was offered a settlement on the morning of the hearing. She refused. She wanted the truth on record publicly. In May 2025, Yeovil District Hospital's maternity unit closed. The Care Quality Commission (Care Quality Commission) cited concerns over staffing, equipment and the failure to learn from serious incidents. The unit recorded seven serious untoward incidents in 2022 and another seven in 2023. An obstetrician described the combined figures as reasonably alarming for a unit of that size. Somerset NHS Foundation Trust acknowledged it had not always got its culture right. Yeovil is now one of 12 NHS Trusts under investigation by Baroness Valerie Amos. Amanda gave evidence to the Amos inquiry. She did not hold back. She told the BBC: if that was happening in Yeovil, where else was it happening in the country? That is the right question. HSIB went into maternity units across England time and again. It was renamed MNSI and moved under the umbrella of CQC. The name changed. The pattern did not. This is what happens to NHS whistleblowers. You do your job. You tell the truth. You hit a brick wall. Amanda Ford hit that wall years before the unit closed. She is still standing. The evidence she raised in 2019 is now a national scandal. More to follow. Source: BBCNews, 26 February 2026 Dr Minh Alexander Minh Alexander minhalexander.bsky.social

Artur Nadolny

25,112 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten