正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Narendra Modi has a huge obsession with promoting himself, whether it is through the media or actors. 📷 And as for sleeping only 3 hours, there is nothing to be proud of in that; it is either a disease or a clear lie. 😒

10,573 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Transparency in the judiciary is even more important than transparency in the executive and the legislature. Today, our judiciary is not confined to its role as an adjudicator; it has become a lawmaker and has entered into governance. Whether or not that is right—and it is certainly not right, as the judiciary is not meant for that—this is the reality. It is futile to think that things will change overnight. If the judiciary continues to assume the roles of the executive and the legislature, it will lead to its collapse. And that is certain. ​As far as the government is concerned, it is theoretically accountable to Parliament, Courts, the media, and the public. The judiciary, however, is accountable to none. The only form of accountability is public access to court proceedings, which modern technology makes easy. That access cannot be denied, especially not in the name of preventing monetization or commercial use. ​What is this monetization and commercial use? It is negligible. A few YouTubers here and there might make a little money out of it, but that is trivial. It is merely an excuse—an absolutely meaningless one. There is no reason why our temples of justice should not remain open to the public. Whatever transpires in a court of justice, the public has a right to know. ​Freedom of speech and expression includes the right to information, and the right to information certainly includes the right to disseminate it. Therefore, there can be no legal justification for disallowing or barring the recording and dissemination of court proceedings.

Mathews J. Nedumpara

17,672 次观看 • 19 天前