NASA’s impossible battery. Ironically my view offers a possibility that some things are real. If the official story is true, then EVERYTHING is fake…

A passive decay based battery, no nuclear chain reaction, can certainly be built to last an incredibly long time. The temperature in space is misleading, the battery would literally be Heating, the spacecraft, which has incredibly limited heat dissipation capability. Continued

If the battery can heat anything for 60 years and transfer data 2 billion miles it’s the greatest invention in human history Not continued The truth is simple to understand

@OwenBenjamin Thank you for bringing the proper receipts I had started to break down how long it would take to charge an electric car with the power from the decay “batteries” but gave up hope I hope this is able to put it in the context needed, but somehow I doubt they will understand

@OwenBenjamin I honestly would’ve guessed much longer But still, lol

We don't have that much plutonium, and these things (RTGs) supposedly don't generate that much power, so jumping to 'everything is fake' doesn't math.

A battery that can do what they claim would be the greatest achievement in the history of man. It can transmit information billions of miles and heat a craft for a human lifetime with tech before the personal computer. Yes If that’s true then every single R and D division of every major company is fake and there is no free market whatsoever and every media company is in on it. I prefer to think it’s simply fake. So that every aspect of modern reality isn’t. Potemkin village

RTG doesn't transmit information (that would be radio over a vacuum), it generates a small/low amount of power using a very rare material. There's no heat conductivity in space, only radiation, so cooling is much more of an issue than heating.

It uses Plutonium-238 as a power source though lol, not solar and not batteries. Plutonium-238 has a half life of 80 years, the energy decay from it transfers into energy thats used to send data back and forth to voyager. I like the conspiracy, but theres an obvious explanation

Not just the battery at -400F but a radio system from 1970's capable of sending usable data through vacuum of complete void and successfully penetrating exosphere, thermosphere, mesosphere, stratosphere, troposphere, Van Allen belt, and reaching a dude on a spinning ball 🤡 #GRIT

Owen, you have lost it. The tech involved in the Voyager power source is well known, and resembles a battery less than it does a miniature nuclear power plant. Such a "battery" is not viable for personal devices based not only on price, but also availability and safety.

Voyager probes use nuclear energy. a plutonium thermal couple. Not a traditional battery. Not enough output for a vehicle. Not safe for use in consumer markets.

talking out your arse like most space deniers You have no clue what you'r talking about The electrical source is driven by the radioactive decay of Plutonium 238

NASA couldn't fix a pothole.

Its astonishing how fucking retarded you are, the funny thing is you're so fucking stupid you dont even realize how stupid you are

but my wifi goes out in my house 10x a month... NASA saying they got video data of Pluto from 3 billion miles away but haven't been to the moon c'mon Benjamin

Those "batteries" are no small deal... the result of the biggest science project of all time... but your annalysis is garbage! Get a grip dude.. why is everyone getting on the #Stupid train these day...SMH

#1 it's NOT a "battery" It's a Radio Isotope generator powered by Plutonium 238. you want everyone in the world to have Plutonium? I'm sure they would all be totally responsible with it and only use it for PEACEFUL purposes. Stop ranting about shit you don't even research

The air conditioner inside the lunar module was ahead of anything anybody has ever been close to replicating. Unfortunately that technology was also lost .😞

Confusion is one of Sa'tan's favorite tools. People get overloaded with conflicting information and cling onto narratives that are consistent with the worldview that they were offered to subscribe to.

Voyager is powered by Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators powered by Plutonium 238, which is extremely scarce and expensive to produce

bro doesn't know that radioisotope thermoelectric generators are not batteries

It's kind of funny to watch non-engineers try to argue that they know something about engineering. FYI, to send a radio signal takes very little power no matter what the distance. The Voyagers nuclear reactor couldn't power your cell phone for more than a minute.

It's a miniature nuclear reactor designed to produce just enough power for the craft. It will take ~80 years to go through half of the fuel. As the power level has dropped over time, parts of the craft had to be turned off because of not enough power.

What do you mean, “there no sun at Pluto?” It orbits our sun. Thats why we thought it was a planet for so long.

these are not normal batteries. its a chunk of decaying metal, half of it is gone after 88 years, in this time it produces just enough heat and radiation to produce a few 100 watts to power a transmitter. if you think this is fake, then whats going on in nuclear powerplants?

Owen if you havent yet it would be interesting for you to dig deeper on this. I mean maybe I was fooled but there is a lot of history of on earth use of these RTGs. Soviet Union put them in lots of lighthouses to power places that were otherwise impossible to power.

That batter generated 470 watts at launch in 1977 but it has now declined to under 250W. To do that they have 13.5 kg of plutonium. Anyway you may find this interesting.

I can't tell if he's actually this stupid or if pretending to be dumb is how he pays his bills.

@AlisLedgon As always, worth watching.

The battery works better in space than on earth because it works off of temperature gradient. the signal is weak and gets weaker over time, our receivers do the heavy lifting (the voyager signal is comparatively stronger than what we receive from stars light years away)

Dumb.

Wow dude, did someone remove a piece of your brain?

Nuclear batteries work using thermal differential power generation between two dissimilar metals called the seebeck effect. It’s the inverse used in electric coolers. The cold of space and radioactive decay of the isotope creates the current.

You are a very smart Plebian. How does one ascertain such far flung knowledge?

How much would those batteries cost? Lol then how many cars would a person with $10 mill usd need to build a Abomb? An abom could level manhattan. Yea… not so smart.

SDI, strategic defense initiative, that they spent the first trillion of US debt on, in 1980's was all fake. there is not one single shred of evidence it ever existed, nukes are fake too. watch THIS if you think the Cassini probe was ridiculous