Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Nashville, TN || State House Disgusting — Some tomfoolery afoot from these two, which is no surprise — Rep. Chris Todd and sidekick Rusty Grills pushing an amendment to the Scenic River Bill that provides an exception for hazardous waste landfills; Todd, a former TDEC environmental specialist (yep, TDEC),...

dustinkittle's profile picture

Dustin Kittle

27,588 subscribers

17,822 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

US Government trying to pass 2024 Bill ‘HSB 737’ which will grant immunity to pesticide manufacturers for poisoning Americans ‌ “I came out of this subcommittee hearing on HSB 737, which would give pesticide companies immunity for citizens trying to file lawsuits against them for damages.” ‌ “This bill just passed the subcommittee, and it will take away farmers' rights to pursue legal action after damages are caused to their families and themselves.” ‌ “The basic argument presented by Bayer and other chemical companies is that the law lawsuits that are being brought up by them about the damages caused by their products is going to put them out of business.” Status Pending: House Ways and Means Committee Current Status: Subcommittee recommends passage. Vote Total: 2-1
0:56

US Government trying to pass 2024 Bill ‘HSB 737’ which will grant immunity to pesticide manufacturers for poisoning Americans ‌ “I came out of this subcommittee hearing on HSB 737, which would give pesticide companies immunity for citizens trying to file lawsuits against them for damages.” ‌ “This bill just passed the subcommittee, and it will take away farmers' rights to pursue legal action after damages are caused to their families and themselves.” ‌ “The basic argument presented by Bayer and other chemical companies is that the law lawsuits that are being brought up by them about the damages caused by their products is going to put them out of business.” Status Pending: House Ways and Means Committee Current Status: Subcommittee recommends passage. Vote Total: 2-1

Wall Street Apes

740,987 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There is a new provision in the 2026 Farm Bill called Section 10205 that you need to know about In this section, the government is trying to ban any state's ability to warn its citizens that a pesticide product causes cancer The section is called “Uniformity of Pesticide Labeling Requirements” It would have significantly limited states’ ability to require additional warnings, such as cancer risk labels, on pesticide and herbicide products beyond what the EPA approves It would have prohibited states or local governments from requiring pesticide manufacturers to add language like “This product causes cancer” Luckily Rep Anna Paulina Luna introduced an amendment that struck down these sections But keep in mind, this is what our government was trying to pass. Immunity for pesticides manufacturers and making it illegal to warn you That’s what we’re dealing with
0:31

There is a new provision in the 2026 Farm Bill called Section 10205 that you need to know about In this section, the government is trying to ban any state's ability to warn its citizens that a pesticide product causes cancer The section is called “Uniformity of Pesticide Labeling Requirements” It would have significantly limited states’ ability to require additional warnings, such as cancer risk labels, on pesticide and herbicide products beyond what the EPA approves It would have prohibited states or local governments from requiring pesticide manufacturers to add language like “This product causes cancer” Luckily Rep Anna Paulina Luna introduced an amendment that struck down these sections But keep in mind, this is what our government was trying to pass. Immunity for pesticides manufacturers and making it illegal to warn you That’s what we’re dealing with

Wall Street Apes

15,376 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Thomas Massie blocked a plan to give AI data centers immunity from local and state laws. Twice. And he blocked a plan to give pesticide companies immunity to mass poison Americans. “It’s cronyism.” “The first version of the Big Bill had a provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.” “And not just state laws, but local zoning laws.” “Marjorie Taylor Greene and I fought to get that taken out, and it was taken out, fortunately.” “That issue came up again recently in my Judiciary Committee.” “We were marking up eight bills one day in a work session, and I noticed that number six on the list was to exempt data centers from eight different environmental laws.” “They couldn’t be sued if they didn’t have the permits.” “Even though some of those environmental laws may be onerous, I don’t know why you would give an exemption to data centers, but not to the farmers or other industries.” “So I tweeted about it, in real time, blew the whistle, and they decided to take it off of the schedule that day.” “I have obstructed things like special privileges and immunities for data centers.” “And most recently in the Farm Bill, they had a provision that was gonna give special privileges and immunities … to Monsanto-Bayer, which makes glyphosate.” “They said, we’ll give every pesticide immunity from all state labeling laws.” “Myself and some other colleagues worked hard, we drafted amendments.” “We forced it to a vote on the floor of the House and took that special provision … removed from the Farm Bill.” “And I did vote for the Farm Bill because it has my signature piece of legislation in it, which is a bill to make it easier for farmers to use a local processor and sell their beef, pork, and lamb directly to consumers.” This is why the deep state is desperately trying to oust him from Congress right now. And it’s why he needs the people to rally behind him now more than ever. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress
2:56

Thomas Massie blocked a plan to give AI data centers immunity from local and state laws. Twice. And he blocked a plan to give pesticide companies immunity to mass poison Americans. “It’s cronyism.” “The first version of the Big Bill had a provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.” “And not just state laws, but local zoning laws.” “Marjorie Taylor Greene and I fought to get that taken out, and it was taken out, fortunately.” “That issue came up again recently in my Judiciary Committee.” “We were marking up eight bills one day in a work session, and I noticed that number six on the list was to exempt data centers from eight different environmental laws.” “They couldn’t be sued if they didn’t have the permits.” “Even though some of those environmental laws may be onerous, I don’t know why you would give an exemption to data centers, but not to the farmers or other industries.” “So I tweeted about it, in real time, blew the whistle, and they decided to take it off of the schedule that day.” “I have obstructed things like special privileges and immunities for data centers.” “And most recently in the Farm Bill, they had a provision that was gonna give special privileges and immunities … to Monsanto-Bayer, which makes glyphosate.” “They said, we’ll give every pesticide immunity from all state labeling laws.” “Myself and some other colleagues worked hard, we drafted amendments.” “We forced it to a vote on the floor of the House and took that special provision … removed from the Farm Bill.” “And I did vote for the Farm Bill because it has my signature piece of legislation in it, which is a bill to make it easier for farmers to use a local processor and sell their beef, pork, and lamb directly to consumers.” This is why the deep state is desperately trying to oust him from Congress right now. And it’s why he needs the people to rally behind him now more than ever. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

100,984 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Nicole Shanahan is sounding the alarm on a dangerous plan to give pesticide companies immunity for the harm their products cause. Nicole Shanahan: “Glyphosate to me is one of these things that's just as bad as the mRNA vaccine in terms of human health, lack of disclosures, and lack of government accountability.” “The 1986 vaccine safety act gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers such that if you're injured by a vaccine you can't directly sue the manufacturer.” “They're trying to do that same thing with glyphosate right now.” Chuck Benbrook: “The pesticide industry is working very hard to try to change federal and state laws so that pesticide companies can't be sued, in state court, over harms from pesticides that weren't properly disclosed.”
1:22

Nicole Shanahan is sounding the alarm on a dangerous plan to give pesticide companies immunity for the harm their products cause. Nicole Shanahan: “Glyphosate to me is one of these things that's just as bad as the mRNA vaccine in terms of human health, lack of disclosures, and lack of government accountability.” “The 1986 vaccine safety act gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers such that if you're injured by a vaccine you can't directly sue the manufacturer.” “They're trying to do that same thing with glyphosate right now.” Chuck Benbrook: “The pesticide industry is working very hard to try to change federal and state laws so that pesticide companies can't be sued, in state court, over harms from pesticides that weren't properly disclosed.”

MAHA PAC🗽

56,409 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Zen Honeycutt just delivered an ultimatum to Republicans: Eliminate pesticide immunity from the Farm Bill, or they will face a MAHA revolt in the midterms. “This Farm Bill does not focus on farmers first.” “This focuses on pesticide companies first.” House Republicans plan to hand pesticide companies total immunity to mass poison Americans in the 2026 Farm Bill. “We need to stop this.” “Americans will be harmed by this.” But we’re fighting back. We are mobilizing MAHA to demand that Republicans strike Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill. And we need your help to make our demands clear. Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to call on House Republicans to stand with MAHA and refuse Big Ag’s lobbying for a liability shield:🧵 Zen Honeycutt Moms Across America Feds For Freedom
1:38

Zen Honeycutt just delivered an ultimatum to Republicans: Eliminate pesticide immunity from the Farm Bill, or they will face a MAHA revolt in the midterms. “This Farm Bill does not focus on farmers first.” “This focuses on pesticide companies first.” House Republicans plan to hand pesticide companies total immunity to mass poison Americans in the 2026 Farm Bill. “We need to stop this.” “Americans will be harmed by this.” But we’re fighting back. We are mobilizing MAHA to demand that Republicans strike Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill. And we need your help to make our demands clear. Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to call on House Republicans to stand with MAHA and refuse Big Ag’s lobbying for a liability shield:🧵 Zen Honeycutt Moms Across America Feds For Freedom

Stand for Health Freedom

21,192 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Catherine Austin-Fitts just sounded the alarm. A pesticide liability shield will cause an “extinction-level event.” Why? It will absolutely destroy fertility. And she says this is no accident. It’s intentional. “Depopulation” is exactly what the elites want. “They’ve enjoyed so much success depopulating by giving vaccines corporate liability shields that you have Bayer, who bought Monsanto, coming around and trying to get both the feds and the states to give pesticide liability shields.” “If you look at the extraordinary amount of money and support that’s coming [from] the mega rich to support this, it’s no accident.” “There’s no way, given the science on this, that they don’t know.” “There’s no way it’s anything other than intentional.” “The battle for control of the food system is extraordinary.” “If you look at the Trump policies, you are looking at thousands of different actions by government to severely consolidate farming in agriculture.” Trump is pushing a pesticide liability shield on two fronts right now: First, House Republicans included a liability shield for pesticide companies in the 2026 Farm Bill. Trump personally urged Congress to pass it. Second, Monsanto is asking the Supreme Court to give them a liability shield in a case that will be heard later this month, Monsanto v. Durnell. And Trump’s DOJ sided with Monsanto. In case you haven’t noticed, Trump has completely abandoned and betrayed MAHA. The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts Paul Buitink 🎙
2:57

Catherine Austin-Fitts just sounded the alarm. A pesticide liability shield will cause an “extinction-level event.” Why? It will absolutely destroy fertility. And she says this is no accident. It’s intentional. “Depopulation” is exactly what the elites want. “They’ve enjoyed so much success depopulating by giving vaccines corporate liability shields that you have Bayer, who bought Monsanto, coming around and trying to get both the feds and the states to give pesticide liability shields.” “If you look at the extraordinary amount of money and support that’s coming [from] the mega rich to support this, it’s no accident.” “There’s no way, given the science on this, that they don’t know.” “There’s no way it’s anything other than intentional.” “The battle for control of the food system is extraordinary.” “If you look at the Trump policies, you are looking at thousands of different actions by government to severely consolidate farming in agriculture.” Trump is pushing a pesticide liability shield on two fronts right now: First, House Republicans included a liability shield for pesticide companies in the 2026 Farm Bill. Trump personally urged Congress to pass it. Second, Monsanto is asking the Supreme Court to give them a liability shield in a case that will be heard later this month, Monsanto v. Durnell. And Trump’s DOJ sided with Monsanto. In case you haven’t noticed, Trump has completely abandoned and betrayed MAHA. The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts Paul Buitink 🎙

Holden Culotta

82,579 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Supreme Court is considering giving pesticide makers sweeping immunity from lawsuits. As long as the EPA says their pesticides are “safe,” you wouldn’t be able to sue them for causing cancer anymore. There’s just one problem: The EPA is captured by the pesticide industry. Stacy Malkan told Kim Iversen that the EPA often uses pesticide “industry data” to make their decisions on pesticide safety. And President Trump’s DOJ is siding with pesticide makers, urging the Supreme Court to hand Bayer and other pesticide corporations the sweeping liability shield from lawsuits they’re asking for. That would devastate American farmers, further entrench corporate power, and crush MAHA’s goal of healthier food. We just published a blog breaking down how this Supreme Court case is part of a much larger “misinformation and intimidation campaign” by Bayer, and why this liability shield would be devastating for American farmers. This is a turning point for America’s food system. Read our full blog below:🧵 Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 Stacy Malkan
0:33

The Supreme Court is considering giving pesticide makers sweeping immunity from lawsuits. As long as the EPA says their pesticides are “safe,” you wouldn’t be able to sue them for causing cancer anymore. There’s just one problem: The EPA is captured by the pesticide industry. Stacy Malkan told Kim Iversen that the EPA often uses pesticide “industry data” to make their decisions on pesticide safety. And President Trump’s DOJ is siding with pesticide makers, urging the Supreme Court to hand Bayer and other pesticide corporations the sweeping liability shield from lawsuits they’re asking for. That would devastate American farmers, further entrench corporate power, and crush MAHA’s goal of healthier food. We just published a blog breaking down how this Supreme Court case is part of a much larger “misinformation and intimidation campaign” by Bayer, and why this liability shield would be devastating for American farmers. This is a turning point for America’s food system. Read our full blog below:🧵 Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 Stacy Malkan

Farm Action

44,067 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie stood on the steps of the Supreme Court today and named what is actually happening. Bayer is running a four-front war: against the executive branch, state legislatures, Congress, and the courts. The goal is liability immunity, a permanent get out of court free card for a company that has lost hundreds of millions of dollars in cancer verdicts. Massie is not giving it to them. He and Representative Chellie Pingree have introduced the "No Immunity for Glyphosate Act," but as Massie made clear, it should not even be necessary. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers to the states. The First Amendment protects the right to know what is in a product. None of those have been repealed. All of them are currently in jeopardy. The question before the Supreme Court is whether state judges will be gagged, state juries disbanded, and state courts shuttered, with no plan to hear these cases anywhere else. Massie called it what it is: regulatory capture. The White House chief of staff works for a lobbying firm that took money from Monsanto Bayer, and that conflict is sitting at the center of an executive order the administration is using to shield the company from accountability. The people standing on those steps today are the answer to that. Full clip linked below 👇
2:10

🚨Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie stood on the steps of the Supreme Court today and named what is actually happening. Bayer is running a four-front war: against the executive branch, state legislatures, Congress, and the courts. The goal is liability immunity, a permanent get out of court free card for a company that has lost hundreds of millions of dollars in cancer verdicts. Massie is not giving it to them. He and Representative Chellie Pingree have introduced the "No Immunity for Glyphosate Act," but as Massie made clear, it should not even be necessary. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers to the states. The First Amendment protects the right to know what is in a product. None of those have been repealed. All of them are currently in jeopardy. The question before the Supreme Court is whether state judges will be gagged, state juries disbanded, and state courts shuttered, with no plan to hear these cases anywhere else. Massie called it what it is: regulatory capture. The White House chief of staff works for a lobbying firm that took money from Monsanto Bayer, and that conflict is sitting at the center of an executive order the administration is using to shield the company from accountability. The people standing on those steps today are the answer to that. Full clip linked below 👇

The HighWire

108,079 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Pope’s Prayer intention for the month of May is for an end to food waste and that everyone has access to food. “Awaken in us a new awareness that we learn to thank you for every food, to consume simply, to share with joy, and to care for the fruits of the earth as a gift from you, destined for all, not just a few.”
3:52

The Pope’s Prayer intention for the month of May is for an end to food waste and that everyone has access to food. “Awaken in us a new awareness that we learn to thank you for every food, to consume simply, to share with joy, and to care for the fruits of the earth as a gift from you, destined for all, not just a few.”

Catholic Sat

134,752 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 NEWS: The amendment to remove the pesticide liability shield language from the Farm Bill WILL be made in order— meaning the full House will get a chance to debate and vote on this before final passage of the farm bill. Now, it’s not the “Pingree-Massie” Amendment, which had broad bipartisan support. But the text they went with is identical to ours so that’s a win in my book. This is huge victory, but the fight is far from over. Thank you thank you to everyone — including the #MAHA activists who raised hell and said loud and clear: we cannot support a Farm Bill that puts chemical company profits over the health of Americans! Let your Member of Congress know — support the Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Amendment!
1:41

🚨 NEWS: The amendment to remove the pesticide liability shield language from the Farm Bill WILL be made in order— meaning the full House will get a chance to debate and vote on this before final passage of the farm bill. Now, it’s not the “Pingree-Massie” Amendment, which had broad bipartisan support. But the text they went with is identical to ours so that’s a win in my book. This is huge victory, but the fight is far from over. Thank you thank you to everyone — including the #MAHA activists who raised hell and said loud and clear: we cannot support a Farm Bill that puts chemical company profits over the health of Americans! Let your Member of Congress know — support the Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Amendment!

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree

51,400 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 NOW: President Trump reveals he's VERY PROUD of Sen. Rand Paul for defeating a "POISON PILL" amendment by Bill Cassidy, that would've countered the DOJ anti-weaponization fund in border funding legislation PAUL: "Ironically, the author of this amendment is the one creating a weaponization fund and directing it to pay his chosen group of people!" "This amendment is nothing more than a poison bill that would prevent us from doing what is at hand and that is securing our border, enforcing our immigration laws. Democrats and some others refuse to vote for one dollar for the border." "Republicans have stepped up to do the job Democrats refuse to do. We cannot let them hijack this bill at the last moment with an unrelated issue."
1:41

🚨 NOW: President Trump reveals he's VERY PROUD of Sen. Rand Paul for defeating a "POISON PILL" amendment by Bill Cassidy, that would've countered the DOJ anti-weaponization fund in border funding legislation PAUL: "Ironically, the author of this amendment is the one creating a weaponization fund and directing it to pay his chosen group of people!" "This amendment is nothing more than a poison bill that would prevent us from doing what is at hand and that is securing our border, enforcing our immigration laws. Democrats and some others refuse to vote for one dollar for the border." "Republicans have stepped up to do the job Democrats refuse to do. We cannot let them hijack this bill at the last moment with an unrelated issue."

Eric Daugherty

468,939 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, which presents as a reform, is in reality a retreat from constitutional morality, judicial guidance and the hard-fought rights of one of the most marginalized communities in our country. The transgender community in India has endured centuries of exclusion, stigma and violence. Any law that claims to protect them must be expansive, inclusive and rooted in dignity. The most alarming feature of this Bill is the complete removal of the definition of a transgender person as it exists in the 2019 Act. This Amendment Bill exposes the government’s inadequate and insensitive understanding of the transgender community. This Bill is not only against human being. The decisions we make in this House will shape the lives of countless individuals. I urge the government to withdraw the Bill or at least refer it to the Parliamentary Standing Committee for detailed examination. : R.Sudha ji in Lok Sabha
5:46

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, which presents as a reform, is in reality a retreat from constitutional morality, judicial guidance and the hard-fought rights of one of the most marginalized communities in our country. The transgender community in India has endured centuries of exclusion, stigma and violence. Any law that claims to protect them must be expansive, inclusive and rooted in dignity. The most alarming feature of this Bill is the complete removal of the definition of a transgender person as it exists in the 2019 Act. This Amendment Bill exposes the government’s inadequate and insensitive understanding of the transgender community. This Bill is not only against human being. The decisions we make in this House will shape the lives of countless individuals. I urge the government to withdraw the Bill or at least refer it to the Parliamentary Standing Committee for detailed examination. : R.Sudha ji in Lok Sabha

Congress

10,659 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I AGREE WITH WHAT ESTEEMED PASTOR DAVID IBIYEOMIE SAID ABOUT PASTOR CHRIS ✅️ Pastor Chris has been able to replicate his grace through us and caused us to be like him. Apart from Paul in the Bible, Pastor Chris is the only man of God that I've ever heard say, "Follow Me, as I follow Christ." Do you know what that means? That is huge!!!, Apostle Paul said, "...I wish that all me will be like me", that means these men have gotten a testimony from God, just like Enoch, that they have pleased God. This means that if you can be like Pastor Chris, God will be pleased with you. It means the Man of God Pastor Chris has been thoroughly trained by God, quality controlled by God, and places before us as an Icon of the gospel. That's why the Holy Spirit can appear to people, with Pastor Chris' face. Pastor Chris is not just a Pastor, he is an icon of the gospel. When you see Pastor Chris, it means Jesus is here, the Gospel is Here, Healing is here. The Man of God Pastor Chris is a Man tested and trusted by God for men to follow. FOLLOW PASTOR CHRIS OYAKHILOME, AND YOU WILL NOT MISS THE RAPTURE!!!
0:54

I AGREE WITH WHAT ESTEEMED PASTOR DAVID IBIYEOMIE SAID ABOUT PASTOR CHRIS ✅️ Pastor Chris has been able to replicate his grace through us and caused us to be like him. Apart from Paul in the Bible, Pastor Chris is the only man of God that I've ever heard say, "Follow Me, as I follow Christ." Do you know what that means? That is huge!!!, Apostle Paul said, "...I wish that all me will be like me", that means these men have gotten a testimony from God, just like Enoch, that they have pleased God. This means that if you can be like Pastor Chris, God will be pleased with you. It means the Man of God Pastor Chris has been thoroughly trained by God, quality controlled by God, and places before us as an Icon of the gospel. That's why the Holy Spirit can appear to people, with Pastor Chris' face. Pastor Chris is not just a Pastor, he is an icon of the gospel. When you see Pastor Chris, it means Jesus is here, the Gospel is Here, Healing is here. The Man of God Pastor Chris is a Man tested and trusted by God for men to follow. FOLLOW PASTOR CHRIS OYAKHILOME, AND YOU WILL NOT MISS THE RAPTURE!!!

Michael🌹

53,093 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

An hour ago, I was on South Africa’s public broadcaster, the SABC News News discussing the implications of Zimbabwe’s new law, Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, which came into effect two days ago. The amendment extends President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office by an additional two years to 2030, removes the direct election of the President by citizens and transfers that responsibility to Parliament, and effectively removes the elections that had been scheduled for 2028. We also discussed what these changes mean not only for Zimbabwe but for the entire region, particularly South Africa, which has borne the brunt of migration from Zimbabwe, both legal and illegal, driven largely by the country’s prolonged economic and political crises. What happens in Zimbabwe never stays in Zimbabwe. Political instability, economic decline, and democratic backsliding inevitably have consequences for neighbouring countries. That is why Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 is not merely a Zimbabwean issue; it is a regional issue with far-reaching political, economic, and social implications.
10:06

An hour ago, I was on South Africa’s public broadcaster, the SABC News News discussing the implications of Zimbabwe’s new law, Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, which came into effect two days ago. The amendment extends President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office by an additional two years to 2030, removes the direct election of the President by citizens and transfers that responsibility to Parliament, and effectively removes the elections that had been scheduled for 2028. We also discussed what these changes mean not only for Zimbabwe but for the entire region, particularly South Africa, which has borne the brunt of migration from Zimbabwe, both legal and illegal, driven largely by the country’s prolonged economic and political crises. What happens in Zimbabwe never stays in Zimbabwe. Political instability, economic decline, and democratic backsliding inevitably have consequences for neighbouring countries. That is why Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 is not merely a Zimbabwean issue; it is a regional issue with far-reaching political, economic, and social implications.

Hopewell Chin’ono

106,601 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Thomas Massie is sounding the alarm. Congress is on the brink of passing a liability shield for pesticide companies, like Bayer, who give Americans cancer. Bayer is a foreign company, but Congress wants to give them total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “This is not to grant farmers’ immunity.” “This is to grant the corporations immunity.” “If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.” This liability shield would be a complete betrayal of the MAHA movement. But House Republicans are on the brink of passing it anyway, and President Trump is urging them to do it. There is still time to fight back. We need all hands on deck to stop this. Here’s how you can take action: Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to urge Congress to remove Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill in order to preserve Americans’ right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us:🧵 Thomas Massie
0:33

Thomas Massie is sounding the alarm. Congress is on the brink of passing a liability shield for pesticide companies, like Bayer, who give Americans cancer. Bayer is a foreign company, but Congress wants to give them total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “This is not to grant farmers’ immunity.” “This is to grant the corporations immunity.” “If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.” This liability shield would be a complete betrayal of the MAHA movement. But House Republicans are on the brink of passing it anyway, and President Trump is urging them to do it. There is still time to fight back. We need all hands on deck to stop this. Here’s how you can take action: Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to urge Congress to remove Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill in order to preserve Americans’ right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us:🧵 Thomas Massie

Stand for Health Freedom

436,109 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.
6:58

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

Hopewell Chin’ono

62,465 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

These two friends had booked an Airbnb with two beds and a scenic view. When they get there they find out that their scenic view is on a house boat and the only way to get there is by raft. They make it to the boat and it seems like their beds are gonna be in a one room boat, it isn’t as spacious as they imagined and the rocking on the boat makes them uneasy. If you got to your Airbnb and it was a boat, would you still stay?
1:49

These two friends had booked an Airbnb with two beds and a scenic view. When they get there they find out that their scenic view is on a house boat and the only way to get there is by raft. They make it to the boat and it seems like their beds are gonna be in a one room boat, it isn’t as spacious as they imagined and the rocking on the boat makes them uneasy. If you got to your Airbnb and it was a boat, would you still stay?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

472,638 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This farmer just blew the whistle on a five-alarm fire for MAHA: Chinese pesticide manufacturer Syngenta just announced that they’re “ceasing all production” of paraquat, an “extremely toxic” herbicide. But in the US, paraquat is “still approved by the EPA.” And House Republicans are advancing a new law to give pesticide makers like Syngenta and Bayer a total immunity shield from being sued for mass poisoning Americans. Regenerative farmer and Iowa gubernatorial candidate Zach Lahn warned that this liability shield will lead to the exact same kind of disaster caused by the 1986 liability shield for vaccines: “They’ll have a blank check to produce what they wanna produce and not have to face the repercussions.” “We are captured to an extent that we don’t even realize.” House Republicans are on the brink of the ultimate betrayal of MAHA if this liability shield passes. They snuck it into the 2026 Farm Bill and quietly advanced it in the middle of the night last week. Now, it’s on us to fight back. Here’s how: We are demanding that House Republicans strike Sections 10205, 10206, 10206, and portions of 10201 from the 2026 Farm Bill. But we need your help. Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to take action in just 2 minutes:🧵 Zach Lahn
2:33

This farmer just blew the whistle on a five-alarm fire for MAHA: Chinese pesticide manufacturer Syngenta just announced that they’re “ceasing all production” of paraquat, an “extremely toxic” herbicide. But in the US, paraquat is “still approved by the EPA.” And House Republicans are advancing a new law to give pesticide makers like Syngenta and Bayer a total immunity shield from being sued for mass poisoning Americans. Regenerative farmer and Iowa gubernatorial candidate Zach Lahn warned that this liability shield will lead to the exact same kind of disaster caused by the 1986 liability shield for vaccines: “They’ll have a blank check to produce what they wanna produce and not have to face the repercussions.” “We are captured to an extent that we don’t even realize.” House Republicans are on the brink of the ultimate betrayal of MAHA if this liability shield passes. They snuck it into the 2026 Farm Bill and quietly advanced it in the middle of the night last week. Now, it’s on us to fight back. Here’s how: We are demanding that House Republicans strike Sections 10205, 10206, 10206, and portions of 10201 from the 2026 Farm Bill. But we need your help. Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to take action in just 2 minutes:🧵 Zach Lahn

Stand for Health Freedom

59,949 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten