正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

NATALIE WINTERS: The only time these Leftists call China an existential threat is when their defense contractor friends need more money. The same goes for the grifters posing as MAGA. They stay silent on the real threats but are happy to sell China our AI chips when it boosts... show more

Bannon’s WarRoom

311,252 subscribers

12,662 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

NATALIE WINTERS: The exchange of knowledge and information only goes one way, and I think the biggest meta point to sort of debunk this idea that any of these exchanges can be done in good faith, even if they are, take that false, you know, premise at face value, what is the ROI in risking the intel capture, the espionage that could happen there, the CI threats? I'm sorry, but last time I checked, the Chinese Communist Party has only become more aggressive, right? Especially in Taiwan. Their military buildup is only accelerating. I don't see the United States really competing, you know, boot for boot, munition for munition, when it comes to rebuilding our factories. The Chinese Communist Party is kinda trouncing us. Natalie Winters

NATALIE WINTERS: The exchange of knowledge and information only goes one way, and I think the biggest meta point to sort of debunk this idea that any of these exchanges can be done in good faith, even if they are, take that false, you know, premise at face value, what is the ROI in risking the intel capture, the espionage that could happen there, the CI threats? I'm sorry, but last time I checked, the Chinese Communist Party has only become more aggressive, right? Especially in Taiwan. Their military buildup is only accelerating. I don't see the United States really competing, you know, boot for boot, munition for munition, when it comes to rebuilding our factories. The Chinese Communist Party is kinda trouncing us. Natalie Winters

Bannon’s WarRoom

10,967 次观看 • 4 天前

Natalie Winters on Iran "The messaging is all over the place. I’m as MAGA as it gets. We love Trump, but it’s fair to ask for clarity... If this turns into another dragged out kinetic conflict, that’s not what we voted for.

Natalie Winters on Iran "The messaging is all over the place. I’m as MAGA as it gets. We love Trump, but it’s fair to ask for clarity... If this turns into another dragged out kinetic conflict, that’s not what we voted for.

The American Conservative

38,480 次观看 • 5 个月前

WINTERS: The loudest argument for invading Iran is “they say death to America.” But here’s the truth. Plenty of people say death to America, and you don’t have to go overseas to find them. Go to D.C. That’s the enemy within. That’s why the media melted down when Trump said it. Look at their policies. Demographic change. Economic pain. Hardship by design. They don’t just tolerate the destruction of your life. They enjoy it. Natalie Winters

WINTERS: The loudest argument for invading Iran is “they say death to America.” But here’s the truth. Plenty of people say death to America, and you don’t have to go overseas to find them. Go to D.C. That’s the enemy within. That’s why the media melted down when Trump said it. Look at their policies. Demographic change. Economic pain. Hardship by design. They don’t just tolerate the destruction of your life. They enjoy it. Natalie Winters

Bannon’s WarRoom

12,539 次观看 • 7 个月前

If America wants to win the AI race, we need to stop holding back our technology. Sell our chips to everyone, even our adversaries. When the world builds on U.S. hardware, we control the platform and stay years ahead. Restricting Nvidia and AMD chips doesn’t hurt China; it just pushes them to build their own stack. That’s a strategic mistake. My message to lawmakers: don’t ban chips. Out-innovate the world and make them dependent on us. That’s how you win the technology war.

If America wants to win the AI race, we need to stop holding back our technology. Sell our chips to everyone, even our adversaries. When the world builds on U.S. hardware, we control the platform and stay years ahead. Restricting Nvidia and AMD chips doesn’t hurt China; it just pushes them to build their own stack. That’s a strategic mistake. My message to lawmakers: don’t ban chips. Out-innovate the world and make them dependent on us. That’s how you win the technology war.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

17,910 次观看 • 8 个月前

Remember when Trump said that China "sought to identify US journalists who had reported negatively on the US president and pay them large sums of money to write more negative articles about him"? Natalie Winters tells me she has uncovered the identities of journalists she believes have participated in China's pay-for-play propaganda machine: "There's a sister group to [the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front] called the Committee of 100. It's a little more US-based, but I actually obtained — I just published the story — a leaked document from them. They unintentionally put it up on their website, and it was an internal trip report... where they were talking about five journalists that had gone to China. They were saying it was $60,000 a person that they were covering their expenses, and they were literally itemizing the ARTICLES that they got in return from these people after they came back, even having some of these journalists give them direct commentary and quotes about how these trips 'changed their perspective of China.' They're touring Huawei facilities, they're touring military bases, they're touring sanctioned companies. One trip participant, upon return, she literally published an article: 'China bashing is for losers.' You have another one praising everything that China has done on climate change. One warned that, 'decoupling from China would backfire.' A Washington Post editor literally published a story titled, 'Team Trump should be careful what it wishes for on China.' They said that China doesn't currency manipulate, TPP is great, the scrutiny of Huawei isn't misplaced. This is a direct quote: 'Americans should accept that large-scale manufacturing will never return to the United States.' Back in 2010, they were more focused on shaping how Americans viewed China... Now, it's more about attacking Trump, attacking people who are tough on China, shaping how Americans actually engage with our foremost adversary."

Remember when Trump said that China "sought to identify US journalists who had reported negatively on the US president and pay them large sums of money to write more negative articles about him"? Natalie Winters tells me she has uncovered the identities of journalists she believes have participated in China's pay-for-play propaganda machine: "There's a sister group to [the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front] called the Committee of 100. It's a little more US-based, but I actually obtained — I just published the story — a leaked document from them. They unintentionally put it up on their website, and it was an internal trip report... where they were talking about five journalists that had gone to China. They were saying it was $60,000 a person that they were covering their expenses, and they were literally itemizing the ARTICLES that they got in return from these people after they came back, even having some of these journalists give them direct commentary and quotes about how these trips 'changed their perspective of China.' They're touring Huawei facilities, they're touring military bases, they're touring sanctioned companies. One trip participant, upon return, she literally published an article: 'China bashing is for losers.' You have another one praising everything that China has done on climate change. One warned that, 'decoupling from China would backfire.' A Washington Post editor literally published a story titled, 'Team Trump should be careful what it wishes for on China.' They said that China doesn't currency manipulate, TPP is great, the scrutiny of Huawei isn't misplaced. This is a direct quote: 'Americans should accept that large-scale manufacturing will never return to the United States.' Back in 2010, they were more focused on shaping how Americans viewed China... Now, it's more about attacking Trump, attacking people who are tough on China, shaping how Americans actually engage with our foremost adversary."

Glenn Beck

123,071 次观看 • 21 天前

The DoD's Emil Michael on defense strategy: "The pacing threat is China." "You can do more than one thing at one time, but it has to have a focus... and now it's moving, as it should in my view, to China," he tells our Jack Detsch at POLITICO Live's AI & Tech Summit.

The DoD's Emil Michael on defense strategy: "The pacing threat is China." "You can do more than one thing at one time, but it has to have a focus... and now it's moving, as it should in my view, to China," he tells our Jack Detsch at POLITICO Live's AI & Tech Summit.

POLITICO

45,567 次观看 • 11 个月前

So not only are they illegitimately spending our money, but they are intentionally over spending by double to line the pockets of their billionaire friends. Most corrupt administration ever. These are the things they don’t want you seeing.

So not only are they illegitimately spending our money, but they are intentionally over spending by double to line the pockets of their billionaire friends. Most corrupt administration ever. These are the things they don’t want you seeing.

MAGA Cult Slayer

46,416 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨🇨🇳 🇷🇺 AN EXISTENTIAL STAND: RUSSIA AND CHINA’S RED LINE Garland Nixon explains that Russia and China view the U.S. attempt to control the Straits of Hormuz as an existential threat to their own leverage and survival. Iran is no longer worried about media optics; they are focused on establishing a clear, symmetrical response: "if you hit us, we hit you." The "big players" are all in, and they won't back down when pushed into a corner. Garland Nixon

🚨🇨🇳 🇷🇺 AN EXISTENTIAL STAND: RUSSIA AND CHINA’S RED LINE Garland Nixon explains that Russia and China view the U.S. attempt to control the Straits of Hormuz as an existential threat to their own leverage and survival. Iran is no longer worried about media optics; they are focused on establishing a clear, symmetrical response: "if you hit us, we hit you." The "big players" are all in, and they won't back down when pushed into a corner. Garland Nixon

Mario Nawfal

70,392 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

Lord Bebo

100,384 次观看 • 1 年前

Claiming the US has no cards when it comes to negotiating with china is a PRC talking point… China is rolling out the red carpet for President Trump far more aggressively than it ever did for Obama (and even with more pageantry than in Trump’s first term)… they recognize they need our chips amid unemployment, deflation, population decline, and a real estate crisis.

Claiming the US has no cards when it comes to negotiating with china is a PRC talking point… China is rolling out the red carpet for President Trump far more aggressively than it ever did for Obama (and even with more pageantry than in Trump’s first term)… they recognize they need our chips amid unemployment, deflation, population decline, and a real estate crisis.

Lydia Moynihan

18,330 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Trump Administration’s reckless decision to sell advanced AI chips to China — after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang donated to Trump’s White House ballroom and attended a $1-million-a-head dinner — puts one company’s bottom line over U.S. national security and AI leadership. We need to monitor AI to detect and prevent self-awareness and ambition. China is not the only threat. See the recent bestseller: "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Why Superhuman AI Would Kill Us All."

The Trump Administration’s reckless decision to sell advanced AI chips to China — after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang donated to Trump’s White House ballroom and attended a $1-million-a-head dinner — puts one company’s bottom line over U.S. national security and AI leadership. We need to monitor AI to detect and prevent self-awareness and ambition. China is not the only threat. See the recent bestseller: "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Why Superhuman AI Would Kill Us All."

Congressman Brad Sherman

42,770 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”

DogeDesigner

244,339 次观看 • 26 天前

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 SPEAKER JOHNSON DEFENDS TRUMP SELLING NVIDIA AI CHIPS TO CHINA: "IF WE DON'T, THEY'LL OVERTAKE US" Speaker Johnson explained Trump's decision to lift export controls allowing Nvidia to sell AI chips to approved Chinese customers, warning that blocking sales could allow China to overtake America's AI dominance: "China is a principal threat except for the national debt. I met with Jensen, the CEO of Nvidia. He has about 95% market share of AI. His argument is if he's not able to compete in China, then their system can overtake him and thus overtake the US. It's a delicate balance. We've got to treat China as the adversary that they are but also they're a really important trade partner." Source: Fox

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 SPEAKER JOHNSON DEFENDS TRUMP SELLING NVIDIA AI CHIPS TO CHINA: "IF WE DON'T, THEY'LL OVERTAKE US" Speaker Johnson explained Trump's decision to lift export controls allowing Nvidia to sell AI chips to approved Chinese customers, warning that blocking sales could allow China to overtake America's AI dominance: "China is a principal threat except for the national debt. I met with Jensen, the CEO of Nvidia. He has about 95% market share of AI. His argument is if he's not able to compete in China, then their system can overtake him and thus overtake the US. It's a delicate balance. We've got to treat China as the adversary that they are but also they're a really important trade partner." Source: Fox

Mario Nawfal

28,949 次观看 • 8 个月前