Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

NATALIE WINTERS: The only time these Leftists call China an existential threat is when their defense contractor friends need more money. The same goes for the grifters posing as MAGA. They stay silent on the real threats but are happy to sell China our AI chips when it boosts... show more

Bannon’s WarRoom

311,811 subscribers

12,773 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

NATALIE WINTERS: The exchange of knowledge and information only goes one way, and I think the biggest meta point to sort of debunk this idea that any of these exchanges can be done in good faith, even if they are, take that false, you know, premise at face value, what is the ROI in risking the intel capture, the espionage that could happen there, the CI threats? I'm sorry, but last time I checked, the Chinese Communist Party has only become more aggressive, right? Especially in Taiwan. Their military buildup is only accelerating. I don't see the United States really competing, you know, boot for boot, munition for munition, when it comes to rebuilding our factories. The Chinese Communist Party is kinda trouncing us. Natalie Winters

NATALIE WINTERS: The exchange of knowledge and information only goes one way, and I think the biggest meta point to sort of debunk this idea that any of these exchanges can be done in good faith, even if they are, take that false, you know, premise at face value, what is the ROI in risking the intel capture, the espionage that could happen there, the CI threats? I'm sorry, but last time I checked, the Chinese Communist Party has only become more aggressive, right? Especially in Taiwan. Their military buildup is only accelerating. I don't see the United States really competing, you know, boot for boot, munition for munition, when it comes to rebuilding our factories. The Chinese Communist Party is kinda trouncing us. Natalie Winters

Bannon’s WarRoom

10,967 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Natalie Winters on Iran "The messaging is all over the place. I’m as MAGA as it gets. We love Trump, but it’s fair to ask for clarity... If this turns into another dragged out kinetic conflict, that’s not what we voted for.

Natalie Winters on Iran "The messaging is all over the place. I’m as MAGA as it gets. We love Trump, but it’s fair to ask for clarity... If this turns into another dragged out kinetic conflict, that’s not what we voted for.

The American Conservative

38,480 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

WINTERS: The loudest argument for invading Iran is “they say death to America.” But here’s the truth. Plenty of people say death to America, and you don’t have to go overseas to find them. Go to D.C. That’s the enemy within. That’s why the media melted down when Trump said it. Look at their policies. Demographic change. Economic pain. Hardship by design. They don’t just tolerate the destruction of your life. They enjoy it. Natalie Winters

WINTERS: The loudest argument for invading Iran is “they say death to America.” But here’s the truth. Plenty of people say death to America, and you don’t have to go overseas to find them. Go to D.C. That’s the enemy within. That’s why the media melted down when Trump said it. Look at their policies. Demographic change. Economic pain. Hardship by design. They don’t just tolerate the destruction of your life. They enjoy it. Natalie Winters

Bannon’s WarRoom

12,539 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

NATALIE WINTERS: The PRC is conducting and targeting and trying to understand the American voting bloc, the demographics, particularly trying to understand President Trump's base,--- what makes Americans tick, what makes them vote for certain candidates, how can you get turnout, what are their perspectives on China. Then you have a more broader simulation tier which they're running, which is actually running mock US elections. --- So they trained AI to be able to respond to future posts from President Trump or Kamala Harris or whoever, and be able to basically mock or simulate a reply from an American to most likely attack President Trump. They say in their reporting that it could, "Help shape public opinion in the United States." Natalie Winters

NATALIE WINTERS: The PRC is conducting and targeting and trying to understand the American voting bloc, the demographics, particularly trying to understand President Trump's base,--- what makes Americans tick, what makes them vote for certain candidates, how can you get turnout, what are their perspectives on China. Then you have a more broader simulation tier which they're running, which is actually running mock US elections. --- So they trained AI to be able to respond to future posts from President Trump or Kamala Harris or whoever, and be able to basically mock or simulate a reply from an American to most likely attack President Trump. They say in their reporting that it could, "Help shape public opinion in the United States." Natalie Winters

Bannon’s WarRoom

16,602 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇯🇵 A they/them leftist on Japanese TV makes the following claims: 🔴Communists need to be more radical. 🔴Japan must be nicer to China. 🔴 Japan must have no military. 🔴 Real communism will come when leftists are more radical. You do have to wonder why leftists look the same everywhere. They follow the same playbook, have the same opinions, etc. It all feels coordinated.

🇯🇵 A they/them leftist on Japanese TV makes the following claims: 🔴Communists need to be more radical. 🔴Japan must be nicer to China. 🔴 Japan must have no military. 🔴 Real communism will come when leftists are more radical. You do have to wonder why leftists look the same everywhere. They follow the same playbook, have the same opinions, etc. It all feels coordinated.

鈴森はるか『haruka suzumori』 🇯🇵

70,378 просмотров • 10 дней назад

WINTERS: 100s of 1000s of dollars are being spent lobbying for a NEW visa category called the HEARTLAND VISA. They complain that WE’RE NOT GIVING ENOUGH VISAS TO INDIANS. They’ve already identified over 1.5K American towns they say are experiencing demographic and economic decline. Their solution is IMPORTING FOREIGNERS. It’s funded by left-wing NGOs and Big Tech money. Natalie Winters

WINTERS: 100s of 1000s of dollars are being spent lobbying for a NEW visa category called the HEARTLAND VISA. They complain that WE’RE NOT GIVING ENOUGH VISAS TO INDIANS. They’ve already identified over 1.5K American towns they say are experiencing demographic and economic decline. Their solution is IMPORTING FOREIGNERS. It’s funded by left-wing NGOs and Big Tech money. Natalie Winters

Grace Chong, MBI

11,955 просмотров • 2 дней назад

If America wants to win the AI race, we need to stop holding back our technology. Sell our chips to everyone, even our adversaries. When the world builds on U.S. hardware, we control the platform and stay years ahead. Restricting Nvidia and AMD chips doesn’t hurt China; it just pushes them to build their own stack. That’s a strategic mistake. My message to lawmakers: don’t ban chips. Out-innovate the world and make them dependent on us. That’s how you win the technology war.

If America wants to win the AI race, we need to stop holding back our technology. Sell our chips to everyone, even our adversaries. When the world builds on U.S. hardware, we control the platform and stay years ahead. Restricting Nvidia and AMD chips doesn’t hurt China; it just pushes them to build their own stack. That’s a strategic mistake. My message to lawmakers: don’t ban chips. Out-innovate the world and make them dependent on us. That’s how you win the technology war.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

17,910 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Remember when Trump said that China "sought to identify US journalists who had reported negatively on the US president and pay them large sums of money to write more negative articles about him"? Natalie Winters tells me she has uncovered the identities of journalists she believes have participated in China's pay-for-play propaganda machine: "There's a sister group to [the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front] called the Committee of 100. It's a little more US-based, but I actually obtained — I just published the story — a leaked document from them. They unintentionally put it up on their website, and it was an internal trip report... where they were talking about five journalists that had gone to China. They were saying it was $60,000 a person that they were covering their expenses, and they were literally itemizing the ARTICLES that they got in return from these people after they came back, even having some of these journalists give them direct commentary and quotes about how these trips 'changed their perspective of China.' They're touring Huawei facilities, they're touring military bases, they're touring sanctioned companies. One trip participant, upon return, she literally published an article: 'China bashing is for losers.' You have another one praising everything that China has done on climate change. One warned that, 'decoupling from China would backfire.' A Washington Post editor literally published a story titled, 'Team Trump should be careful what it wishes for on China.' They said that China doesn't currency manipulate, TPP is great, the scrutiny of Huawei isn't misplaced. This is a direct quote: 'Americans should accept that large-scale manufacturing will never return to the United States.' Back in 2010, they were more focused on shaping how Americans viewed China... Now, it's more about attacking Trump, attacking people who are tough on China, shaping how Americans actually engage with our foremost adversary."

Remember when Trump said that China "sought to identify US journalists who had reported negatively on the US president and pay them large sums of money to write more negative articles about him"? Natalie Winters tells me she has uncovered the identities of journalists she believes have participated in China's pay-for-play propaganda machine: "There's a sister group to [the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front] called the Committee of 100. It's a little more US-based, but I actually obtained — I just published the story — a leaked document from them. They unintentionally put it up on their website, and it was an internal trip report... where they were talking about five journalists that had gone to China. They were saying it was $60,000 a person that they were covering their expenses, and they were literally itemizing the ARTICLES that they got in return from these people after they came back, even having some of these journalists give them direct commentary and quotes about how these trips 'changed their perspective of China.' They're touring Huawei facilities, they're touring military bases, they're touring sanctioned companies. One trip participant, upon return, she literally published an article: 'China bashing is for losers.' You have another one praising everything that China has done on climate change. One warned that, 'decoupling from China would backfire.' A Washington Post editor literally published a story titled, 'Team Trump should be careful what it wishes for on China.' They said that China doesn't currency manipulate, TPP is great, the scrutiny of Huawei isn't misplaced. This is a direct quote: 'Americans should accept that large-scale manufacturing will never return to the United States.' Back in 2010, they were more focused on shaping how Americans viewed China... Now, it's more about attacking Trump, attacking people who are tough on China, shaping how Americans actually engage with our foremost adversary."

Glenn Beck

123,581 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The DoD's Emil Michael on defense strategy: "The pacing threat is China." "You can do more than one thing at one time, but it has to have a focus... and now it's moving, as it should in my view, to China," he tells our Jack Detsch at POLITICO Live's AI & Tech Summit.

The DoD's Emil Michael on defense strategy: "The pacing threat is China." "You can do more than one thing at one time, but it has to have a focus... and now it's moving, as it should in my view, to China," he tells our Jack Detsch at POLITICO Live's AI & Tech Summit.

POLITICO

45,567 просмотров • 1 год назад

So not only are they illegitimately spending our money, but they are intentionally over spending by double to line the pockets of their billionaire friends. Most corrupt administration ever. These are the things they don’t want you seeing.

So not only are they illegitimately spending our money, but they are intentionally over spending by double to line the pockets of their billionaire friends. Most corrupt administration ever. These are the things they don’t want you seeing.

MAGA Cult Slayer

46,469 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 🇷🇺 AN EXISTENTIAL STAND: RUSSIA AND CHINA’S RED LINE Garland Nixon explains that Russia and China view the U.S. attempt to control the Straits of Hormuz as an existential threat to their own leverage and survival. Iran is no longer worried about media optics; they are focused on establishing a clear, symmetrical response: "if you hit us, we hit you." The "big players" are all in, and they won't back down when pushed into a corner. Garland Nixon

🚨🇨🇳 🇷🇺 AN EXISTENTIAL STAND: RUSSIA AND CHINA’S RED LINE Garland Nixon explains that Russia and China view the U.S. attempt to control the Straits of Hormuz as an existential threat to their own leverage and survival. Iran is no longer worried about media optics; they are focused on establishing a clear, symmetrical response: "if you hit us, we hit you." The "big players" are all in, and they won't back down when pushed into a corner. Garland Nixon

Mario Nawfal

70,392 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

Lord Bebo

100,411 просмотров • 1 год назад

Claiming the US has no cards when it comes to negotiating with china is a PRC talking point… China is rolling out the red carpet for President Trump far more aggressively than it ever did for Obama (and even with more pageantry than in Trump’s first term)… they recognize they need our chips amid unemployment, deflation, population decline, and a real estate crisis.

Claiming the US has no cards when it comes to negotiating with china is a PRC talking point… China is rolling out the red carpet for President Trump far more aggressively than it ever did for Obama (and even with more pageantry than in Trump’s first term)… they recognize they need our chips amid unemployment, deflation, population decline, and a real estate crisis.

Lydia Moynihan

18,330 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Trump Administration’s reckless decision to sell advanced AI chips to China — after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang donated to Trump’s White House ballroom and attended a $1-million-a-head dinner — puts one company’s bottom line over U.S. national security and AI leadership. We need to monitor AI to detect and prevent self-awareness and ambition. China is not the only threat. See the recent bestseller: "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Why Superhuman AI Would Kill Us All."

The Trump Administration’s reckless decision to sell advanced AI chips to China — after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang donated to Trump’s White House ballroom and attended a $1-million-a-head dinner — puts one company’s bottom line over U.S. national security and AI leadership. We need to monitor AI to detect and prevent self-awareness and ambition. China is not the only threat. See the recent bestseller: "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Why Superhuman AI Would Kill Us All."

Congressman Brad Sherman

42,770 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад