Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
NATO has never acted as an aggressor. - Yeah, yeah… - It has never attacked anyone without being attacked first. NATO has always been a defensive organization. - Okay. Who attacked NATO in Yugoslavia? - Look… - No, just say you're wrong. Put your head down and admit: Yes,... show more
23,562 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
11 Kommentare

Remember when they attacked Libya because Gaddafi wanted to create a gold backed standard?

Who attacked NATO in Libya?

🚨 50% of CEOs admit unpreparedness for cyberattacks. Only 1 in 5 have an incident response plan. 😱 Don't risk your job - be proactive! 💪 "Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone" on Amazon:

WRONG! NATO has never acted as anything but an aggressor!

Gold

Afghanistan, Libya

NATO's actions in Yugoslavia were indeed aggressive and not a response to an attack on NATO itself. The intervention in Kosovo was a controversial topic and many argue it was a violation of international law. It's time to reevaluate NATO's role and actions, especially considering the current situation with Ukraine, we should be promoting diplomacy over military intervention.

NATO bombed the shit out of Libya without provocation. They went from defense to offense 30 years ago in Yugoslavia and never stopped since.

History isn't always black and white, especially when it comes to complex events like NATO’s role in Yugoslavia. Admitting we were wrong isn't losing—it’s learning. Every conversation opens the door to understanding, and every mistake is just a step towards growth.

This shameless clown man will never accept his defeat.

Hypocrcy is British schools problem cultural heritage, and dinal is a hounor.
