Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"NATO is dead as an organization. It was created to stop Soviet-Russian aggression against free Europe, and when that aggression came, NATO did not even try to stop it. A new European security system is now being built..." - Garry Kasparov

DakdaR22's profile picture

D.Radka, #NAFO 🇨🇿🤝🇺🇦

35,078 subscribers

28,224 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov said that Russia is preparing for war with NATO in Europe in the next 10 years. If Ukraine will lose, Russians will not stop in Ukraine. Russia is going to fight NATO, Putin is preparing for aggression against the European Union and does not hide it
0:34

Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov said that Russia is preparing for war with NATO in Europe in the next 10 years. If Ukraine will lose, Russians will not stop in Ukraine. Russia is going to fight NATO, Putin is preparing for aggression against the European Union and does not hide it

Денис Казанський

34,944 просмотров • 1 год назад

NATO was built to stop Russia. Ukraine is already doing it. ㅤ Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor says NATO should want Ukraine inside the alliance because Ukraine has proven it can do the very thing NATO exists to do: stop, deter, and fight Russian aggression if it comes. After years of full-scale war, Ukraine has battlefield experience, modern drone warfare skills, and an army that has already held back the largest military threat in Europe. ㅤ Ukraine would not weaken NATO. Ukraine would make NATO stronger where it matters most. ㅤ
0:51

NATO was built to stop Russia. Ukraine is already doing it. ㅤ Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor says NATO should want Ukraine inside the alliance because Ukraine has proven it can do the very thing NATO exists to do: stop, deter, and fight Russian aggression if it comes. After years of full-scale war, Ukraine has battlefield experience, modern drone warfare skills, and an army that has already held back the largest military threat in Europe. ㅤ Ukraine would not weaken NATO. Ukraine would make NATO stronger where it matters most. ㅤ

Meanwhile in Ukraine

21,144 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Chasiv Yar. The aggressor, Russia, has been razing cities to the ground in Ukraine for more than two years now. Fuck everyone who justifies Russian aggression. Fuck everyone who calls on Ukraine to surrender to this evil. Fuck everyone who speaks against arming Ukraine. Fuck everyone who speaks against putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine. Putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine had to happen two years ago. Fuck everyone who is against the collapse of Russia. Russia needs to collapse, and Russia will collapse. Arm Ukraine now to defeat Russia sooner rather than later. Arm Ukraine, now! Ukraine in NATO, and NATO in Ukraine, now! NATO has been created to deter Russian aggression. NATO ate budgets for years, and now that Russian aggression is here, NATO is failing to deter Russia and to stop Russia. NATO should lean into the war because the war is already here, and Russia started it in 2014 with the illegal occupation of Crimea. There is no folding it back into a matching box. The war is here.
0:53

Chasiv Yar. The aggressor, Russia, has been razing cities to the ground in Ukraine for more than two years now. Fuck everyone who justifies Russian aggression. Fuck everyone who calls on Ukraine to surrender to this evil. Fuck everyone who speaks against arming Ukraine. Fuck everyone who speaks against putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine. Putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine had to happen two years ago. Fuck everyone who is against the collapse of Russia. Russia needs to collapse, and Russia will collapse. Arm Ukraine now to defeat Russia sooner rather than later. Arm Ukraine, now! Ukraine in NATO, and NATO in Ukraine, now! NATO has been created to deter Russian aggression. NATO ate budgets for years, and now that Russian aggression is here, NATO is failing to deter Russia and to stop Russia. NATO should lean into the war because the war is already here, and Russia started it in 2014 with the illegal occupation of Crimea. There is no folding it back into a matching box. The war is here.

Stardust Collector

136,931 просмотров • 2 лет назад

NATO was created to stop communism from spreading to the West. The USSR collapsed in 1991, and Russia is now a capitalist country. Why did NATO not disappear then? Because they profit from selling fear and arms to Europe.
2:39

NATO was created to stop communism from spreading to the West. The USSR collapsed in 1991, and Russia is now a capitalist country. Why did NATO not disappear then? Because they profit from selling fear and arms to Europe.

Chay Bowes

23,488 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Europe can only be peaceful if peace is guaranteed by full security certainty. Europe cannot have a deficit of security certainty that will provoke 🇷🇺 tyranny and aggression. 🇷🇺 will try to take a bite out of Europe only when it sees any kind of security uncertainty. When everything is certain and obvious, 🇷🇺 tyranny does not dare to violate security. It is obvious that Europe can be protected from any aggression only together with 🇺🇦 and only together with Ukraine in NATO. That is why we must achieve security certainty about our future in the Alliance. Then 🇷🇺 will have to refocus on its own statehood - to finally take care of itself, not some expansions.
7:35

Europe can only be peaceful if peace is guaranteed by full security certainty. Europe cannot have a deficit of security certainty that will provoke 🇷🇺 tyranny and aggression. 🇷🇺 will try to take a bite out of Europe only when it sees any kind of security uncertainty. When everything is certain and obvious, 🇷🇺 tyranny does not dare to violate security. It is obvious that Europe can be protected from any aggression only together with 🇺🇦 and only together with Ukraine in NATO. That is why we must achieve security certainty about our future in the Alliance. Then 🇷🇺 will have to refocus on its own statehood - to finally take care of itself, not some expansions.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

759,900 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Even setting aside the moral case, supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression is strategic for the U.S. It lowers the risk of getting drawn into a wider NATO war in the Baltics if that aggression goes unchecked
0:52

Even setting aside the moral case, supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression is strategic for the U.S. It lowers the risk of getting drawn into a wider NATO war in the Baltics if that aggression goes unchecked

Michael McFaul

39,609 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bolton: This is a palpable harm to American national security, because what Hegseth and Trump did today was not only blow up the NATO position on Ukraine, they blew up a thing called the Belovezha Accords… So it means that not only is unprovoked aggression by Russia against Ukraine now okay, every other former Republic in the Soviet Union is vulnerable to the same thing without any indication that the U.S. will do anything about it.
1:13

Bolton: This is a palpable harm to American national security, because what Hegseth and Trump did today was not only blow up the NATO position on Ukraine, they blew up a thing called the Belovezha Accords… So it means that not only is unprovoked aggression by Russia against Ukraine now okay, every other former Republic in the Soviet Union is vulnerable to the same thing without any indication that the U.S. will do anything about it.

Acyn

361,532 просмотров • 1 год назад

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...
2:34

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...

Kerry Burgess

32,806 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"One can say that NATO no longer exist in the environment it did when it was created." Is NATO a paper tiger that is done in a new World Order shaped by China, Russia, Iran and Turkey?
3:07

"One can say that NATO no longer exist in the environment it did when it was created." Is NATO a paper tiger that is done in a new World Order shaped by China, Russia, Iran and Turkey?

THEE ALFA HOUSE

23,968 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Garry Kasparov: Four years Ukraine is fighting for the whole Europe. NATO was built to fight only one war, not to go to Afghanistan, not to go to Syria. One war to save free Europe from Russian aggression. Ukraine is the only country that is fighting this war and we're still discussing should we include them or not? Ukraine is the only country that is fulfilling NATO's destiny. Putin, Xi Jinping, all others, they are celebrating it. And by the way, Russia has North Koreans, they have Cubans, they have Africans, volunteers. And we're still talking about escalation? We have everything, military, political, economic powers on our side, and we're still losing the war. Thanks to Ukraine, Russia is not fulfilling Putin's dream of restoring a Russian empire. But if, God forbid, Ukraine is forced to make this deal, then, very clear, Putin will realize his dream. And then, guys, you're next - Garry Kasparov
2:50

Garry Kasparov: Four years Ukraine is fighting for the whole Europe. NATO was built to fight only one war, not to go to Afghanistan, not to go to Syria. One war to save free Europe from Russian aggression. Ukraine is the only country that is fighting this war and we're still discussing should we include them or not? Ukraine is the only country that is fulfilling NATO's destiny. Putin, Xi Jinping, all others, they are celebrating it. And by the way, Russia has North Koreans, they have Cubans, they have Africans, volunteers. And we're still talking about escalation? We have everything, military, political, economic powers on our side, and we're still losing the war. Thanks to Ukraine, Russia is not fulfilling Putin's dream of restoring a Russian empire. But if, God forbid, Ukraine is forced to make this deal, then, very clear, Putin will realize his dream. And then, guys, you're next - Garry Kasparov

Anton Gerashchenko

99,696 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

⚡️ “Dictators always lie about the past — but very often tell you exactly what they are going to do,” Garry Kasparov said about Putin According to Kasparov, Putin openly described the collapse of the Soviet Union as “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century” back in 2005, and later used the 2007 Munich Security Conference to openly challenge the West and NATO. 💬 “Ukraine is the main target now, but it is not the final target. Putin wants to restore the empire and push NATO back to its 1997 borders.” Kasparov argues that Europe still refuses to take these warnings seriously: “This is no longer a threat. This is a menace.”
1:32

⚡️ “Dictators always lie about the past — but very often tell you exactly what they are going to do,” Garry Kasparov said about Putin According to Kasparov, Putin openly described the collapse of the Soviet Union as “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century” back in 2005, and later used the 2007 Munich Security Conference to openly challenge the West and NATO. 💬 “Ukraine is the main target now, but it is not the final target. Putin wants to restore the empire and push NATO back to its 1997 borders.” Kasparov argues that Europe still refuses to take these warnings seriously: “This is no longer a threat. This is a menace.”

NEXTA

31,558 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Russian soldier came to fight against a NATO “country.” He doesn’t know where it is, but says it’s somewhere in Europe, that it’s smaller than Russia, and has a NATO-ish language and NATO-ish currency. They hate what they’ve been told to hate and kill those they’ve been told to kill, without even knowing anything about it because they do it for money.
1:12

Russian soldier came to fight against a NATO “country.” He doesn’t know where it is, but says it’s somewhere in Europe, that it’s smaller than Russia, and has a NATO-ish language and NATO-ish currency. They hate what they’ve been told to hate and kill those they’ve been told to kill, without even knowing anything about it because they do it for money.

Victoria

207,550 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Scott Ritter: Nothing's going to stop Russia from winning this war. NATO is a parasite. It sucks the lifeblood out of the United States. NATO is an organization that's outlived its usefulness. NATO doesn't have the ability to meaningfully intervene.
4:19

Scott Ritter: Nothing's going to stop Russia from winning this war. NATO is a parasite. It sucks the lifeblood out of the United States. NATO is an organization that's outlived its usefulness. NATO doesn't have the ability to meaningfully intervene.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

32,840 просмотров • 1 год назад

Stoltenberg: Ukraine can't become a full NATO member now because Article 5 would immediately put NATO at war with Russia But any new deal cannot become “Minsk III” that only delays the next Russian aggression. The best future security guarantee for Ukraine is NATO membership. 1/
1:19

Stoltenberg: Ukraine can't become a full NATO member now because Article 5 would immediately put NATO at war with Russia But any new deal cannot become “Minsk III” that only delays the next Russian aggression. The best future security guarantee for Ukraine is NATO membership. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

30,175 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

1. Russia attacks NATO member Romania. 2. All European NATO leaders immediately excuse the Russian military attack that targeted civilians as accidental on Russia's behalf, despite Russia not claiming that it was an accident. (Odd right?) 3. Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council Medvedev confirms the attack on NATO and tells the Europeans: "Shut up. This is just the beginning." Says more attacks on NATO are coming. Is it time for some European NATO members to give Russia some of their land and people in the name of "peace," as they'd been pressuring Ukraine to do for 12 years? According to them there is no military solution when Russia attacks - only negotiations. Get on it, you cowards.
0:28

1. Russia attacks NATO member Romania. 2. All European NATO leaders immediately excuse the Russian military attack that targeted civilians as accidental on Russia's behalf, despite Russia not claiming that it was an accident. (Odd right?) 3. Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council Medvedev confirms the attack on NATO and tells the Europeans: "Shut up. This is just the beginning." Says more attacks on NATO are coming. Is it time for some European NATO members to give Russia some of their land and people in the name of "peace," as they'd been pressuring Ukraine to do for 12 years? According to them there is no military solution when Russia attacks - only negotiations. Get on it, you cowards.

Igor Sushko

117,312 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад