Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🇷🇺 NATO’S $1M PROBLEM: SHOOTING DOWN $20K DRONES On paper, NATO’s air defenses look bulletproof. Patriot missiles. F-35s. Radar that can spot a seagull over Siberia. But Russia just exposed the gap: the Alliance can’t efficiently kill cheap drones. These aren’t high-tech stealth threats - they’re flying lawnmowers with... explosives. Cost: about $20,000 each. The missile Poland used to take one down? Over a million. Congratulations, you just lost the world’s most expensive trade. NATO’s radar can see them - it just doesn’t make sense to waste million-dollar missiles on what are basically DIY kamikaze kits. And stocks of those missiles? Running low. Solutions exist: lasers (unlimited ammo, power-hungry as hell), flak guns (old-school, cheap, brutal), and interceptor drones (Ukraine’s already doing it). But none are scaled. Yet. The truth: NATO built a shield for Cold War giants - not swarm-sized ghosts. Prediction: expect the next arms race to look less like “Top Gun” and more like “Terminator with Wi-Fi.” Source: BBC, Reuters, NATO Reports, The Economistshow more

Mario Nawfal

3,677,003 subscribers

233,637 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Наука и технологии Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran’s secret military method: “Soak Sponge” Imagine a super expensive U.S. warship: it has powerful radar and about 100 missiles. But once those missiles are gone… it can’t reload at sea. Now Iran exploits that: they launch a bunch of old, slow, cheap missiles. Basically junk. Easy to shoot down. But the ship has no choice. It must intercept every single one. So for a $10,000 missile, it fires a $2 million interceptor. Over and over. The ship becomes a “sponge”… soaking up cheap attacks with expensive ammo. Eventually, it runs out. And when it does, that $2 billion warship has to leave. No hits needed, just drain it. Source: loadedlore YT

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran’s secret military method: “Soak Sponge” Imagine a super expensive U.S. warship: it has powerful radar and about 100 missiles. But once those missiles are gone… it can’t reload at sea. Now Iran exploits that: they launch a bunch of old, slow, cheap missiles. Basically junk. Easy to shoot down. But the ship has no choice. It must intercept every single one. So for a $10,000 missile, it fires a $2 million interceptor. Over and over. The ship becomes a “sponge”… soaking up cheap attacks with expensive ammo. Eventually, it runs out. And when it does, that $2 billion warship has to leave. No hits needed, just drain it. Source: loadedlore YT

Mario Nawfal

1,146,040 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺 NATO AIR DEFENSES IN PANIC: RUSSIA REVIVES SOVIET MISSILE ON GERAN DRONES For 50 years, missiles made to shoot down enemy planes flew on fast fighter jets. Then the same missiles were put on trucks on the ground. Now Russia is putting one of those missiles back up in the air — on its Geran drones. The Soviet R-60 missile is flying again, but now it uses simple modern parts to find its target. 🔸 Soviet R-60 missile is now carried by Geran drones — changes to the drone body for launching it became normal by spring 2026. 🔸 Human operator uses a live video feed to fly the drone near the target — then the missile's sensor locks on by itself and flies straight to it. No radar needed on the drone. 🔸 Fake dummy R-60 missiles already used on some Gerans in 2026 — this tricks enemy air defenses into wasting their expensive missiles on nothing. 🔸 Mix of Soviet missile tech and budget everyday electronics creates a low-cost threat that could make defending against these drones very expensive for Western countries. Do you think NATO can catch up to Russia in military technology reinvestment? Follow to keep up with the latest military and technological trends.

🚨🇷🇺 NATO AIR DEFENSES IN PANIC: RUSSIA REVIVES SOVIET MISSILE ON GERAN DRONES For 50 years, missiles made to shoot down enemy planes flew on fast fighter jets. Then the same missiles were put on trucks on the ground. Now Russia is putting one of those missiles back up in the air — on its Geran drones. The Soviet R-60 missile is flying again, but now it uses simple modern parts to find its target. 🔸 Soviet R-60 missile is now carried by Geran drones — changes to the drone body for launching it became normal by spring 2026. 🔸 Human operator uses a live video feed to fly the drone near the target — then the missile's sensor locks on by itself and flies straight to it. No radar needed on the drone. 🔸 Fake dummy R-60 missiles already used on some Gerans in 2026 — this tricks enemy air defenses into wasting their expensive missiles on nothing. 🔸 Mix of Soviet missile tech and budget everyday electronics creates a low-cost threat that could make defending against these drones very expensive for Western countries. Do you think NATO can catch up to Russia in military technology reinvestment? Follow to keep up with the latest military and technological trends.

NewRulesGeopolitics

31,399 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨This is what interceptor reality looks like today: Systems like Russia’s S-300 are high-tech air defenses. They can, in theory, shoot down aircraft, cruise missiles, and even ballistic missiles. But modern attacks don’t try to beat these systems head-on. Instead, they use swarms of missiles, drones, and decoys to overwhelm radar and confuse interceptors. Low-flying cruise missiles slip under radar coverage, while electronic warfare jams sensors. In the Russia-Ukraine war, ballistic missiles and drones are used together. This combination makes strikes deadlier, even though Ukraine intercepts up to 90% of drones. In the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, Israel's multi-layered air defense systems such as the Iron Dome, David's Sling, and Arrow 2/3 have achieved high but not perfect interception rates against Iranian ballistic missiles. The numbers still favor the attacker: defenders may have dozens of interceptors, but attackers can launch hundreds of targets. Air defense gives you better odds, not certainty. Every missile launched is a roll of the dice, and the math always catches up eventually.

🚨This is what interceptor reality looks like today: Systems like Russia’s S-300 are high-tech air defenses. They can, in theory, shoot down aircraft, cruise missiles, and even ballistic missiles. But modern attacks don’t try to beat these systems head-on. Instead, they use swarms of missiles, drones, and decoys to overwhelm radar and confuse interceptors. Low-flying cruise missiles slip under radar coverage, while electronic warfare jams sensors. In the Russia-Ukraine war, ballistic missiles and drones are used together. This combination makes strikes deadlier, even though Ukraine intercepts up to 90% of drones. In the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, Israel's multi-layered air defense systems such as the Iron Dome, David's Sling, and Arrow 2/3 have achieved high but not perfect interception rates against Iranian ballistic missiles. The numbers still favor the attacker: defenders may have dozens of interceptors, but attackers can launch hundreds of targets. Air defense gives you better odds, not certainty. Every missile launched is a roll of the dice, and the math always catches up eventually.

Mario Nawfal

84,143 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺 RUSSIA UNVEILS NEW ANTI-DRONE RADAR THAT RENDERS NATO DRONES OUTDATED At a major security meeting, Rosoboronexport showed off two brand-new systems designed to spot, track, and destroy small enemy drones before they can hit important targets. 🔸 The RADESCAN-ANTIDRON radar can detect tiny drones (with just 0.01 m² radar signature) from 1.5 km away using very low power — making it hard for enemies to even notice it’s there. 🔸 The mobile YOLKA system mounts on a pickup truck with radar panels, infrared cameras, and two interceptor drones that can take down targets up to 3 km away and as high as 2 km. 🔸 It works in any weather, uses semi-automatic mode so an operator stays in control, and is perfect against swarms of low-flying drones. 🔸 The whole thing is already built and in field tests — next step is mass production Is NATO’s drone strategy about to become completely useless?

NewRulesGeopolitics

17,592 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$🇮🇷 Iran keeps throwing cheap Shahed-style drones at targets across the region. The idea is simple: overwhelm defenses with something that costs maybe $20k–$50k to build. But here’s the catch. You don’t always need a fancy interceptor missile to stop them. C-RAM (Counter Rocket, Artillery, Mortar) systems can just shred these slow drones with a wall of 20mm cannon fire. Think of it like a giant automated machine gun that locks on and turns incoming drones into scrap before they get close. The cost math is brutal. An interceptor missile can run anywhere from $100k to well over $1M per shot. Meanwhile C-RAM rounds cost a tiny fraction of that. So when Iran launches waves of cheap drones, sometimes the smartest defense isn’t another expensive missile. It’s just a gun that never stops talking. Source: CNBC, New York Times, NBC News, Military Show YT$

🇮🇷 Iran keeps throwing cheap Shahed-style drones at targets across the region. The idea is simple: overwhelm defenses with something that costs maybe $20k–$50k to build. But here’s the catch. You don’t always need a fancy interceptor missile to stop them. C-RAM (Counter Rocket, Artillery, Mortar) systems can just shred these slow drones with a wall of 20mm cannon fire. Think of it like a giant automated machine gun that locks on and turns incoming drones into scrap before they get close. The cost math is brutal. An interceptor missile can run anywhere from $100k to well over $1M per shot. Meanwhile C-RAM rounds cost a tiny fraction of that. So when Iran launches waves of cheap drones, sometimes the smartest defense isn’t another expensive missile. It’s just a gun that never stops talking. Source: CNBC, New York Times, NBC News, Military Show YT

Mario Nawfal

383,595 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇦🇮🇷THE DRONE WARS ARE REWRITING HOW THE WORLD FIGHTS For decades, military power meant expensive hardware: stealth jets, cruise missiles, precision weapons costing millions. Ukraine and Iran just proved something uncomfortable: You can challenge that power with $20,000 drones. Iran’s Shahed drones, now used heavily by Russia in Ukraine, cost roughly $20,000 to $50,000 and are built to be produced in huge numbers. Launch dozens at once and even the most advanced air defenses struggle to keep up. Shooting them down with multimillion-dollar interceptors quickly becomes a losing economic battle. Ukraine has faced tens of thousands of these drones since 2022 and has been forced to improvise a new style of warfare in response. Instead of relying solely on expensive missile systems, Ukrainian forces developed cheaper counters: machine-gun teams, electronic warfare. interceptor drones costing only a few thousand dollars. The lesson is spreading fast. Countries watching the Ukraine war, and Iran’s growing drone campaigns in the Middle East, are realizing the future battlefield won’t be dominated by a handful of exquisite weapons. It will be dominated by swarms of cheap ones. Factories, not fighter jets, may decide wars. And the real contest will be economic: who can produce drones, interceptors, and countermeasures faster and cheaper. The drone wars in Ukraine and Iran aren’t just regional conflicts; they’re the world’s first glimpse of a new military reality. One where air power no longer belongs only to nations that can afford billion-dollar air forces.

🚨🇺🇦🇮🇷THE DRONE WARS ARE REWRITING HOW THE WORLD FIGHTS For decades, military power meant expensive hardware: stealth jets, cruise missiles, precision weapons costing millions. Ukraine and Iran just proved something uncomfortable: You can challenge that power with $20,000 drones. Iran’s Shahed drones, now used heavily by Russia in Ukraine, cost roughly $20,000 to $50,000 and are built to be produced in huge numbers. Launch dozens at once and even the most advanced air defenses struggle to keep up. Shooting them down with multimillion-dollar interceptors quickly becomes a losing economic battle. Ukraine has faced tens of thousands of these drones since 2022 and has been forced to improvise a new style of warfare in response. Instead of relying solely on expensive missile systems, Ukrainian forces developed cheaper counters: machine-gun teams, electronic warfare. interceptor drones costing only a few thousand dollars. The lesson is spreading fast. Countries watching the Ukraine war, and Iran’s growing drone campaigns in the Middle East, are realizing the future battlefield won’t be dominated by a handful of exquisite weapons. It will be dominated by swarms of cheap ones. Factories, not fighter jets, may decide wars. And the real contest will be economic: who can produce drones, interceptors, and countermeasures faster and cheaper. The drone wars in Ukraine and Iran aren’t just regional conflicts; they’re the world’s first glimpse of a new military reality. One where air power no longer belongs only to nations that can afford billion-dollar air forces.

Mario Nawfal

130,587 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨America Just Changed the Economics of War… With Light For years Iran built a strategy around one brutal equation. Launch thousands of cheap drones. Force the defender to burn through million-dollar interceptors. Bleed the defense dry. It was simple math. A Shahed drone costs roughly $30,000. Stopping it with traditional missile defenses can cost hundreds of thousands… sometimes over a million dollars per intercept. Repeat that attack a thousand times and suddenly the defender is spending billions just to stay alive. Iran understood this. They designed an entire doctrine around it. Flood the sky with cheap weapons. Overwhelm air defenses. Make defense more expensive than offense. But something just changed. The United States Navy has now deployed HELIOS, a directed-energy weapon mounted on an American destroyer operating near Iran. HELIOS is not a missile. It is a laser. And it runs on something every warship already produces… Electricity. No missile to reload. No magazine to empty. No resupply ship needed. As long as the ship’s generators are producing power, the weapon keeps firing. That means the cost of stopping a drone is no longer measured in missiles. It is measured in electricity. In practical terms… Destroying a $30,000 drone can now cost less than the power bill of a large apartment building. That single change breaks the entire economic foundation of drone saturation warfare. For years Iran invested in the strategy that made Shahed drones valuable. Cheap. Numerous. Disposable. But if directed-energy weapons like HELIOS can burn drones out of the sky at near-zero cost… The math flips. Suddenly the attacker is spending money… while the defender spends almost nothing. CENTCOM has already released footage showing HELIOS mounted on a U.S. Navy destroyer in waters near Iran. Earlier tests confirmed the system successfully destroyed multiple drones during live trials. Now the system is deployed where hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles have been passing through the same airspace. This is not a laboratory experiment anymore. This is a real battlefield. And the world is about to find out whether the future of missile defense is not another interceptor… But a beam of light. Because when America decides to change the physics of war… It usually succeeds. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

🚨America Just Changed the Economics of War… With Light For years Iran built a strategy around one brutal equation. Launch thousands of cheap drones. Force the defender to burn through million-dollar interceptors. Bleed the defense dry. It was simple math. A Shahed drone costs roughly $30,000. Stopping it with traditional missile defenses can cost hundreds of thousands… sometimes over a million dollars per intercept. Repeat that attack a thousand times and suddenly the defender is spending billions just to stay alive. Iran understood this. They designed an entire doctrine around it. Flood the sky with cheap weapons. Overwhelm air defenses. Make defense more expensive than offense. But something just changed. The United States Navy has now deployed HELIOS, a directed-energy weapon mounted on an American destroyer operating near Iran. HELIOS is not a missile. It is a laser. And it runs on something every warship already produces… Electricity. No missile to reload. No magazine to empty. No resupply ship needed. As long as the ship’s generators are producing power, the weapon keeps firing. That means the cost of stopping a drone is no longer measured in missiles. It is measured in electricity. In practical terms… Destroying a $30,000 drone can now cost less than the power bill of a large apartment building. That single change breaks the entire economic foundation of drone saturation warfare. For years Iran invested in the strategy that made Shahed drones valuable. Cheap. Numerous. Disposable. But if directed-energy weapons like HELIOS can burn drones out of the sky at near-zero cost… The math flips. Suddenly the attacker is spending money… while the defender spends almost nothing. CENTCOM has already released footage showing HELIOS mounted on a U.S. Navy destroyer in waters near Iran. Earlier tests confirmed the system successfully destroyed multiple drones during live trials. Now the system is deployed where hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles have been passing through the same airspace. This is not a laboratory experiment anymore. This is a real battlefield. And the world is about to find out whether the future of missile defense is not another interceptor… But a beam of light. Because when America decides to change the physics of war… It usually succeeds. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

790,404 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

$🇨🇳 CHINA JUST FLEW A DRONE CARRIER THAT LAUNCHES SWARMS - WELCOME TO WARFARE'S NEXT NIGHTMARE China successfully tested "Jiutian" (High Sky) - a massive unmanned mothership designed to deploy large-scale drone swarms mid-flight. Picture a flying aircraft carrier, except it's unmanned, costs a fraction of the real thing, and instead of launching jets, it releases hundreds of smaller attack drones. The mothership flies to theater, releases the swarm, coordinates their attack, then leaves. The smaller drones overwhelm air defenses through sheer numbers while the expensive platform stays out of danger. Here's why this breaks everything: Air defense systems are built to intercept missiles and aircraft one at a time. Expensive interceptors vs. expensive threats. The math works. Drone swarms flip that equation. You can't shoot down 500 drones with 500 million-dollar missiles. The defender goes bankrupt before the attacker runs out of drones. And Jiutian solves the range problem. Small drones can't fly far. But a mothership extends their reach by thousands of miles. Launch close to target, attack, return to base. The U.S. has been researching this concept for years. China just flew it. Russia's been using cheap drones to deplete Ukrainian air defense. Now imagine that scaled up with a platform that can deploy coordinated swarms anywhere in the Pacific. Taiwan Strait? South China Sea? U.S. carrier groups suddenly face threats they can't economically counter. American carriers cost $13 billion each. Jiutian probably costs under $100 million. The drones it launches? Maybe $50,000 each. Send 1,000 of them at a carrier battle group and watch the defense budget evaporate trying to stop them all. Pentagon's been warning about this exact scenario. Now they're watching China demonstrate the prototype. The next war won't be won by who has the most advanced fighters or biggest ships. It'll be won by who can field the most disposable drones faster than the enemy can shoot them down. China just showed they understand that future better than anyone expected. Source: Clash Report$

🇨🇳 CHINA JUST FLEW A DRONE CARRIER THAT LAUNCHES SWARMS - WELCOME TO WARFARE'S NEXT NIGHTMARE China successfully tested "Jiutian" (High Sky) - a massive unmanned mothership designed to deploy large-scale drone swarms mid-flight. Picture a flying aircraft carrier, except it's unmanned, costs a fraction of the real thing, and instead of launching jets, it releases hundreds of smaller attack drones. The mothership flies to theater, releases the swarm, coordinates their attack, then leaves. The smaller drones overwhelm air defenses through sheer numbers while the expensive platform stays out of danger. Here's why this breaks everything: Air defense systems are built to intercept missiles and aircraft one at a time. Expensive interceptors vs. expensive threats. The math works. Drone swarms flip that equation. You can't shoot down 500 drones with 500 million-dollar missiles. The defender goes bankrupt before the attacker runs out of drones. And Jiutian solves the range problem. Small drones can't fly far. But a mothership extends their reach by thousands of miles. Launch close to target, attack, return to base. The U.S. has been researching this concept for years. China just flew it. Russia's been using cheap drones to deplete Ukrainian air defense. Now imagine that scaled up with a platform that can deploy coordinated swarms anywhere in the Pacific. Taiwan Strait? South China Sea? U.S. carrier groups suddenly face threats they can't economically counter. American carriers cost $13 billion each. Jiutian probably costs under $100 million. The drones it launches? Maybe $50,000 each. Send 1,000 of them at a carrier battle group and watch the defense budget evaporate trying to stop them all. Pentagon's been warning about this exact scenario. Now they're watching China demonstrate the prototype. The next war won't be won by who has the most advanced fighters or biggest ships. It'll be won by who can field the most disposable drones faster than the enemy can shoot them down. China just showed they understand that future better than anyone expected. Source: Clash Report

Mario Nawfal

271,203 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇺🇦 PATRIOTS DOWN BAD - UKRAINE’S MISSILE DEFENSE WITH 6% SUCCESS RATE What started as the West’s golden shield has turned into a $1 billion fire alarm. Ukraine’s U.S.-made Patriot systems are now intercepting just 6% of incoming Russian missiles, down from 42%. Meaning: they’re exhausted, outnumbered, and nearly blind. Retired General Romanenko says the systems are “worn out and overworked” - basically the military version of burnout culture. Russia, meanwhile, leveled up: Its Iskander and Kinzhal missiles now pull evasive maneuvers that make Top Gun look like a tutorial. Even the weather turned traitor - rain and fog jammed radar during last week’s blackout blitz. Germany’s shipping 2 more Patriots, but let’s be real: that’s aspirin for a bullet wound. Ukraine doesn’t just need better weapons. It needs a new playbook. Source: La Razón

🇺🇦 PATRIOTS DOWN BAD - UKRAINE’S MISSILE DEFENSE WITH 6% SUCCESS RATE What started as the West’s golden shield has turned into a $1 billion fire alarm. Ukraine’s U.S.-made Patriot systems are now intercepting just 6% of incoming Russian missiles, down from 42%. Meaning: they’re exhausted, outnumbered, and nearly blind. Retired General Romanenko says the systems are “worn out and overworked” - basically the military version of burnout culture. Russia, meanwhile, leveled up: Its Iskander and Kinzhal missiles now pull evasive maneuvers that make Top Gun look like a tutorial. Even the weather turned traitor - rain and fog jammed radar during last week’s blackout blitz. Germany’s shipping 2 more Patriots, but let’s be real: that’s aspirin for a bullet wound. Ukraine doesn’t just need better weapons. It needs a new playbook. Source: La Razón

Mario Nawfal

526,966 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺🇮🇷 IRAN WAR PROVES: NATO IS NOT READY TO FACE RUSSIA The Iran war showed the world that NATO stayed on the sidelines — yet it exposed serious weaknesses that would make any fight against Russia very difficult for the alliance. 🔸 AMMO RUNNING OUT FAST: The US used up about half its Patriot missiles. French Aster and Mica stocks dropped quickly in just weeks. Russia produces 6,000 to 7,000 attack drones every month, UK’s RUSI expert Justin Bronk reports. 🔸 AIR POWER LIMITS: Iran launched over 5,000 missiles and drones despite US attacks. This proves heavy bombing alone cannot win modern wars. Russia’s deep strike and drone tactics are working well. 🔸 WEAK NAVIES: Britain’s HMS Dragon took three weeks to deploy, then returned due to technical problems. Many European fleets are underinvested and not ready after years of focusing only on land forces. 🔸 GROWING DISUNITY: Europe ignored Trump’s calls for support. Trump called NATO a “paper tiger.” This raises real doubts about whether the US would fully commit if Russia acts. Do you think NATO is capable of sustaining a prolonged DIRECT war against Russia, or will it continue to use Ukraine as cannon fodder?

🚨🇷🇺🇮🇷 IRAN WAR PROVES: NATO IS NOT READY TO FACE RUSSIA The Iran war showed the world that NATO stayed on the sidelines — yet it exposed serious weaknesses that would make any fight against Russia very difficult for the alliance. 🔸 AMMO RUNNING OUT FAST: The US used up about half its Patriot missiles. French Aster and Mica stocks dropped quickly in just weeks. Russia produces 6,000 to 7,000 attack drones every month, UK’s RUSI expert Justin Bronk reports. 🔸 AIR POWER LIMITS: Iran launched over 5,000 missiles and drones despite US attacks. This proves heavy bombing alone cannot win modern wars. Russia’s deep strike and drone tactics are working well. 🔸 WEAK NAVIES: Britain’s HMS Dragon took three weeks to deploy, then returned due to technical problems. Many European fleets are underinvested and not ready after years of focusing only on land forces. 🔸 GROWING DISUNITY: Europe ignored Trump’s calls for support. Trump called NATO a “paper tiger.” This raises real doubts about whether the US would fully commit if Russia acts. Do you think NATO is capable of sustaining a prolonged DIRECT war against Russia, or will it continue to use Ukraine as cannon fodder?

NewRulesGeopolitics

11,395 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The video is seductive. A fighter jet, twin engines blazing, taking fuel at 30,000 feet. It looks like power. It looks like the future. It is neither. The manned fighter jet is one of the most expensive objects a democracy can operate. Training a single combat-ready pilot costs between seven and eight million dollars and takes the better part of three years. The aircraft itself burns through roughly $27,000 every hour it is airborne, before anything goes wrong and something always goes wrong. Then consider what happens on a typical mission. The aircraft launches, flies for five to seven hours, burning through $135,000 to $190,000 in operating costs before a single weapon leaves the wing. It carries perhaps six to nine missiles, each costing anywhere from $300,000 to over a million dollars depending on type. That is the full arsenal. Six to nine shots. After that, the most expensive flying machine in history turns around and goes home. For decades, that cost was justified by what those missiles could do. Nothing in the sky could survive them. The logic was sound. Then someone in a warehouse glued an engine to a set of wings, added a cheap GPS chip, and sent ten thousand of them toward their enemies for less than the cost of a single intercept. In the first week of Operation Epic Fury, Iran fired over 500 ballistic missiles and nearly 2,000 drones at U.S. bases and Israeli cities, burning through over 800 Patriot interceptor missiles in three days. Lockheed Martin produced roughly 600 Patriot interceptors in all of 2025. Iran consumed more than that in 72 hours. A Shahed drone costs around $30,000. A single Patriot interceptor costs millions. The asymmetry is structural. Ukraine’s “Spider’s Web” operation used 117 drones hidden in cargo trucks to inflict an estimated $7 billion in damage on Russian strategic bombers at a total cost of roughly $234,000. For every dollar spent attacking, defenders lost $30,000 in assets. A manned fighter carrying nine missiles cannot survive this arithmetic. It launches, burns $150,000 getting to the fight, expends its rack against a swarm of cheap drones, and returns empty while the next wave is already inbound. Ukraine built interceptor drones for between $1,000 and $2,500 each and moved them from prototype to mass production within months. The Pentagon spent decades perfecting the opposite approach. The manned fighter is obsolete because the threat it was designed to defeat has been replaced by one it cannot economically engage. Capability without sustainability is just an expensive way to lose slowly. The video is beautiful. The paradigm it represents is finished. Gandalv / Gandalv

The video is seductive. A fighter jet, twin engines blazing, taking fuel at 30,000 feet. It looks like power. It looks like the future. It is neither. The manned fighter jet is one of the most expensive objects a democracy can operate. Training a single combat-ready pilot costs between seven and eight million dollars and takes the better part of three years. The aircraft itself burns through roughly $27,000 every hour it is airborne, before anything goes wrong and something always goes wrong. Then consider what happens on a typical mission. The aircraft launches, flies for five to seven hours, burning through $135,000 to $190,000 in operating costs before a single weapon leaves the wing. It carries perhaps six to nine missiles, each costing anywhere from $300,000 to over a million dollars depending on type. That is the full arsenal. Six to nine shots. After that, the most expensive flying machine in history turns around and goes home. For decades, that cost was justified by what those missiles could do. Nothing in the sky could survive them. The logic was sound. Then someone in a warehouse glued an engine to a set of wings, added a cheap GPS chip, and sent ten thousand of them toward their enemies for less than the cost of a single intercept. In the first week of Operation Epic Fury, Iran fired over 500 ballistic missiles and nearly 2,000 drones at U.S. bases and Israeli cities, burning through over 800 Patriot interceptor missiles in three days. Lockheed Martin produced roughly 600 Patriot interceptors in all of 2025. Iran consumed more than that in 72 hours. A Shahed drone costs around $30,000. A single Patriot interceptor costs millions. The asymmetry is structural. Ukraine’s “Spider’s Web” operation used 117 drones hidden in cargo trucks to inflict an estimated $7 billion in damage on Russian strategic bombers at a total cost of roughly $234,000. For every dollar spent attacking, defenders lost $30,000 in assets. A manned fighter carrying nine missiles cannot survive this arithmetic. It launches, burns $150,000 getting to the fight, expends its rack against a swarm of cheap drones, and returns empty while the next wave is already inbound. Ukraine built interceptor drones for between $1,000 and $2,500 each and moved them from prototype to mass production within months. The Pentagon spent decades perfecting the opposite approach. The manned fighter is obsolete because the threat it was designed to defeat has been replaced by one it cannot economically engage. Capability without sustainability is just an expensive way to lose slowly. The video is beautiful. The paradigm it represents is finished. Gandalv / Gandalv

Gandalv

92,237 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Not every answer to Russian drones has to cost a fortune. Sweden is sending Ukraine a smarter one. ㅤ Ukraine will receive modern Tridon Mk2 air defense systems as part of Sweden’s aid, with €400 million allocated for their procurement. The system uses a 40 mm Bofors automatic cannon, works day and night in all weather, can hit targets up to 12 km away, and uses programmable airburst munitions that are especially effective against drones and cruise missiles. Just as important, its cost per shot is relatively low, which matters in a war where cheap mass attacks are meant to drain expensive defenses. ㅤ This is what real support looks like: not words, but a practical shield Ukraine can keep using. ㅤ

Not every answer to Russian drones has to cost a fortune. Sweden is sending Ukraine a smarter one. ㅤ Ukraine will receive modern Tridon Mk2 air defense systems as part of Sweden’s aid, with €400 million allocated for their procurement. The system uses a 40 mm Bofors automatic cannon, works day and night in all weather, can hit targets up to 12 km away, and uses programmable airburst munitions that are especially effective against drones and cruise missiles. Just as important, its cost per shot is relatively low, which matters in a war where cheap mass attacks are meant to drain expensive defenses. ㅤ This is what real support looks like: not words, but a practical shield Ukraine can keep using. ㅤ

Meanwhile in Ukraine

87,356 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

DRONE SWARMS: CHEAP, SNEAKY, AND MAKING MISSILES LOOK STUPID For decades, military power was a flex; stealth jets, billion-dollar programs, advanced missile systems. The assumption was simple: the more expensive your toys, the safer you were. Enter the $10,000 Shahed drone, and suddenly that logic looks like a bad investment pitch. Because the real problem with drone swarms isn’t just that they’re cheap. It’s that they’re hard to see, annoyingly persistent, and perfectly happy to show up in numbers that make most defense systems sweat. This is the part nobody likes to admit: modern air defense is built for impressive threats, not annoying ones. A fighter jet? Big, expensive, predictable behavior, worth the missile. A swarm of low-flying, semi-autonomous drones stitched together with off-the-shelf parts? That's nightmare fuel. You can absolutely shoot them down… if you enjoy the idea of firing a six-figure interceptor at something that costs less than a used car. Do that a few dozen times and congratulations, you’ve successfully defended your airspace straight into a budget crisis. This is what the new battlefield looks like: not a contest of who has the best technology, but who can afford to keep pressing “fire” the longest. But cost is only half the problem. Detection is where things get ugly. These drones fly low, slow, and just quietly enough to blend into the background noise of reality. Radar doesn’t love them. Infrared barely notices them. By the time you’re sure they’re there, they’re already uncomfortably close to something you’d prefer not to explode. So now you’re playing hide-and-seek with something designed to be found too late. Naturally, the solution isn’t one system. It’s all of them. Sensors layered on sensors. Jammers trying to cut signals that may not even matter anymore. Guns sweeping the sky like it’s 1943 again. Smart ammunition that explodes near targets because hitting them directly is apparently too much to ask. And yes, lasers… because nothing says “we’re adapting” like turning science fiction into a workaround. The pitch sounds great: pennies per shot, instant engagement, no reloads. The reality? Still weather-dependent, still power-hungry, and still not a magic wand when the sky looks like a mechanical beehive. Meanwhile, the offense is getting smarter. AI is turning swarms into coordinated systems that don’t just fly, they think, adjust, reroute, and overwhelm. Lose a few drones? Fine. The rest adapt. The mission continues. Nobody sends condolence letters to a pile of circuit boards. We’ve spent decades perfecting exquisite, high-cost ways to destroy things… only to discover that the future belongs to whoever can afford to lose the most stuff the fastest. Source: Military Merchandise YT

DRONE SWARMS: CHEAP, SNEAKY, AND MAKING MISSILES LOOK STUPID For decades, military power was a flex; stealth jets, billion-dollar programs, advanced missile systems. The assumption was simple: the more expensive your toys, the safer you were. Enter the $10,000 Shahed drone, and suddenly that logic looks like a bad investment pitch. Because the real problem with drone swarms isn’t just that they’re cheap. It’s that they’re hard to see, annoyingly persistent, and perfectly happy to show up in numbers that make most defense systems sweat. This is the part nobody likes to admit: modern air defense is built for impressive threats, not annoying ones. A fighter jet? Big, expensive, predictable behavior, worth the missile. A swarm of low-flying, semi-autonomous drones stitched together with off-the-shelf parts? That's nightmare fuel. You can absolutely shoot them down… if you enjoy the idea of firing a six-figure interceptor at something that costs less than a used car. Do that a few dozen times and congratulations, you’ve successfully defended your airspace straight into a budget crisis. This is what the new battlefield looks like: not a contest of who has the best technology, but who can afford to keep pressing “fire” the longest. But cost is only half the problem. Detection is where things get ugly. These drones fly low, slow, and just quietly enough to blend into the background noise of reality. Radar doesn’t love them. Infrared barely notices them. By the time you’re sure they’re there, they’re already uncomfortably close to something you’d prefer not to explode. So now you’re playing hide-and-seek with something designed to be found too late. Naturally, the solution isn’t one system. It’s all of them. Sensors layered on sensors. Jammers trying to cut signals that may not even matter anymore. Guns sweeping the sky like it’s 1943 again. Smart ammunition that explodes near targets because hitting them directly is apparently too much to ask. And yes, lasers… because nothing says “we’re adapting” like turning science fiction into a workaround. The pitch sounds great: pennies per shot, instant engagement, no reloads. The reality? Still weather-dependent, still power-hungry, and still not a magic wand when the sky looks like a mechanical beehive. Meanwhile, the offense is getting smarter. AI is turning swarms into coordinated systems that don’t just fly, they think, adjust, reroute, and overwhelm. Lose a few drones? Fine. The rest adapt. The mission continues. Nobody sends condolence letters to a pile of circuit boards. We’ve spent decades perfecting exquisite, high-cost ways to destroy things… only to discover that the future belongs to whoever can afford to lose the most stuff the fastest. Source: Military Merchandise YT

Mario Nawfal

51,338 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇦🇷🇺 WELCOME TO FIRE WARFARE: THERMITE DRONES TURN UKRAINE’S DEFENSES TO ASH Forget explosives. Russian drones are now dropping thermite - the stuff that burns at 4,000°F and can't be extinguished with water - directly onto Ukraine's anti-drone nets. The nets were supposed to be the low-tech answer to the drone swarm problem. Cheap, effective, scalable. String them up, catch the quadcopters, move on. Except now Moscow's burning through them like they're made of tissue paper. This is a preview of how future wars will be fought - constant adaptation, weaponized chemistry, and defensive infrastructure that's obsolete before it's even deployed. Ukraine builds a corridor defense system; Russia brings literal hellfire to melt it. The real question? How fast can Kyiv iterate before the next countermeasure shows up. Because if thermite drones are this easy to deploy, what stops Russia from using them on fuel depots, ammunition stores, or anything else that burns? War just got even hotter. Source: Visegrád 24

🇺🇦🇷🇺 WELCOME TO FIRE WARFARE: THERMITE DRONES TURN UKRAINE’S DEFENSES TO ASH Forget explosives. Russian drones are now dropping thermite - the stuff that burns at 4,000°F and can't be extinguished with water - directly onto Ukraine's anti-drone nets. The nets were supposed to be the low-tech answer to the drone swarm problem. Cheap, effective, scalable. String them up, catch the quadcopters, move on. Except now Moscow's burning through them like they're made of tissue paper. This is a preview of how future wars will be fought - constant adaptation, weaponized chemistry, and defensive infrastructure that's obsolete before it's even deployed. Ukraine builds a corridor defense system; Russia brings literal hellfire to melt it. The real question? How fast can Kyiv iterate before the next countermeasure shows up. Because if thermite drones are this easy to deploy, what stops Russia from using them on fuel depots, ammunition stores, or anything else that burns? War just got even hotter. Source: Visegrád 24

Mario Nawfal

494,139 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇦🇪🇮🇷 The UAE just released its war numbers and one stands out Since the war started: 357 ballistic missiles, 15 cruise missiles, and 1,815 drones fired at the UAE alone. Three military personnel and six civilians killed, 166 injured. But today's count was 9 drones and zero ballistic missiles. That's a potential shift. Iran may be running low on the short-range ballistic missiles it has been using to target the Emirates. Drones are cheap and easy to produce. Ballistic missiles aren't, and every factory that built them has been bombed for four straight weeks. This matters beyond the Gulf. Those same ballistic missiles, fitted with cluster warheads that split into dozens of bomblets at 23,000 feet, have been one of Iran's most devastating tools against Israel. A single warhead shatters into so many pieces that even Iron Dome and David's Sling can't track them all, which is how Iran caused over 100 casualties in Arad and kept hitting Tel Aviv night after night. If the missile stockpile is genuinely depleting, both the Gulf and Israel could see the pressure ease significantly. Zero ballistic missiles today could be a blip. Or it could be the first sign that four weeks of factory strikes are finally showing results. Source: Open Source Intel AI Telly

🇦🇪🇮🇷 The UAE just released its war numbers and one stands out Since the war started: 357 ballistic missiles, 15 cruise missiles, and 1,815 drones fired at the UAE alone. Three military personnel and six civilians killed, 166 injured. But today's count was 9 drones and zero ballistic missiles. That's a potential shift. Iran may be running low on the short-range ballistic missiles it has been using to target the Emirates. Drones are cheap and easy to produce. Ballistic missiles aren't, and every factory that built them has been bombed for four straight weeks. This matters beyond the Gulf. Those same ballistic missiles, fitted with cluster warheads that split into dozens of bomblets at 23,000 feet, have been one of Iran's most devastating tools against Israel. A single warhead shatters into so many pieces that even Iron Dome and David's Sling can't track them all, which is how Iran caused over 100 casualties in Arad and kept hitting Tel Aviv night after night. If the missile stockpile is genuinely depleting, both the Gulf and Israel could see the pressure ease significantly. Zero ballistic missiles today could be a blip. Or it could be the first sign that four weeks of factory strikes are finally showing results. Source: Open Source Intel AI Telly

Mario Nawfal

561,290 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 NATO'S NIGHTMARE: RUSSIA'S NEW BANDEROL MISSILE OVERWHELM UKRAINE'S FRAGILE DEFENSES Russia has intensified its attacks on Kharkov region, with at least three strikes on June 3 using Banderol “S8000” missiles— a low-cost hybrid system that Western export controls and sanctions were meant to starve but it fueled instead. 🔸 The Banderol delivers up to 500 km range with a ~150 kg warhead powered by a Chinese Swiwin SW800Pro turbojet engine — a sanction-evading standoff weapon built for mass production. 🔸 It launches primarily from the Kronshtadt Orion UAV (with adaptation for Mi-28 helicopters), using pop-out wings and superior agility compared to heavier missiles like the Kh-101 or Kalibr. 🔸 Its cheap, easy-to-manufacture design allows Russia to overwhelm air defenses while conserving expensive munitions, blurring the line between drones and cruise missiles. 🔸 The new threat forces Ukraine to adapt to tighter maneuvers and extended reach, exposing gaps in air defense coverage and the limits of Western sanctions enforcement. Do you think NATO can catch up to Russia in missile technology?

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 NATO'S NIGHTMARE: RUSSIA'S NEW BANDEROL MISSILE OVERWHELM UKRAINE'S FRAGILE DEFENSES Russia has intensified its attacks on Kharkov region, with at least three strikes on June 3 using Banderol “S8000” missiles— a low-cost hybrid system that Western export controls and sanctions were meant to starve but it fueled instead. 🔸 The Banderol delivers up to 500 km range with a ~150 kg warhead powered by a Chinese Swiwin SW800Pro turbojet engine — a sanction-evading standoff weapon built for mass production. 🔸 It launches primarily from the Kronshtadt Orion UAV (with adaptation for Mi-28 helicopters), using pop-out wings and superior agility compared to heavier missiles like the Kh-101 or Kalibr. 🔸 Its cheap, easy-to-manufacture design allows Russia to overwhelm air defenses while conserving expensive munitions, blurring the line between drones and cruise missiles. 🔸 The new threat forces Ukraine to adapt to tighter maneuvers and extended reach, exposing gaps in air defense coverage and the limits of Western sanctions enforcement. Do you think NATO can catch up to Russia in missile technology?

NewRulesGeopolitics

30,588 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺 NIGHT STRIKES… DRONES getting WEIRDLY EFFECTIVE "PETRAEUS: Ukrainian special units doing incredible work every night, going deep into Russia in most innovative of ways. They now have drones that are launched from maritime drones, so they can extend the reach of aerial drones right into very ports where Russian Black Sea fleet has to tie up. They now have maritime drones with air defense missiles on them, which have taken down two Russian fighter jets over Crimea. Of course, in Operation Spiderweb, all the drones that were in the roofs of these tractor-trailers simultaneously emerged, and about a million dollars worth of drones took out, damaged, or destroyed five or six billion dollars worth of strategic aircraft."- David Petraeus 🇺🇸 This isn’t just “drone use”… it’s stacking layers. Sea launching air drones. floating air defense. hiding strike packages in plain sight… then everything goes at once. Cost gap is the real punch here. cheap systems punching way above their weight. And Russia ends up reacting to things that didn’t even exist like this a few years ago.

🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺 NIGHT STRIKES… DRONES getting WEIRDLY EFFECTIVE "PETRAEUS: Ukrainian special units doing incredible work every night, going deep into Russia in most innovative of ways. They now have drones that are launched from maritime drones, so they can extend the reach of aerial drones right into very ports where Russian Black Sea fleet has to tie up. They now have maritime drones with air defense missiles on them, which have taken down two Russian fighter jets over Crimea. Of course, in Operation Spiderweb, all the drones that were in the roofs of these tractor-trailers simultaneously emerged, and about a million dollars worth of drones took out, damaged, or destroyed five or six billion dollars worth of strategic aircraft."- David Petraeus 🇺🇸 This isn’t just “drone use”… it’s stacking layers. Sea launching air drones. floating air defense. hiding strike packages in plain sight… then everything goes at once. Cost gap is the real punch here. cheap systems punching way above their weight. And Russia ends up reacting to things that didn’t even exist like this a few years ago.

WW3finalboss

15,999 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 THE STEALTH MYTH JUST TOOK A HIT, AND THAT SHOULD WORRY EVERYONE A U.S. F-35, the crown jewel of modern airpower, just limped home after taking fire over Iran. Not destroyed. Not confirmed shot down. But hit. And that alone changes the conversation. For years, the F-35 has been sold as invisible, untouchable. A jet designed to slip through enemy airspace like a ghost. So what happened? First, let’s kill the myth: stealth does not mean invisible. Every aircraft reflects radar. The trick is reducing that signal, bending it, scattering it, shrinking it into something harder to detect. Harder. Not impossible. And that distinction may be the whole story. Because the skies over Iran right now aren’t a one-off mission. They’re crowded, repetitive, predictable. F-35s have been flying there a lot. Same routes. Same altitudes. Same mission profiles. That matters. Air defense isn’t static. It learns. Modern systems don’t just “see” aircraft; they collect data over time. Patterns. Angles. Frequencies. Tiny radar returns that look like noise until they don’t. Do that enough times, and the noise starts to look like a signature. Then there’s the second possibility: this wasn’t just Iranian ingenuity. Iran doesn’t build its air defense ecosystem in isolation. It buys. It reverse-engineers. It integrates. Russia has spent years refining systems specifically designed to counter Western stealth. China has invested heavily in multi-band radar, systems that trade precision for detection, spotting stealth aircraft at longer ranges even if they can’t track them perfectly. Individually, these systems have limits. Together? They create something closer to a net. The third explanation is the simplest and the least comfortable: War is messy. Even the most advanced aircraft in history can be hit under the right conditions. A lucky shot. A brief exposure. A pilot forced into a less-than-ideal flight path. The same conflict has already seen drones shot down, friendly fire incidents, and dense, overlapping air defenses lighting up the sky. In that environment, “stealth” becomes less of a shield and more of an advantage, one that can be eroded. If Iran, with a patchwork of imported systems and domestic improvisation, can even touch an F-35, then the future of air warfare looks very different than advertised.

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 THE STEALTH MYTH JUST TOOK A HIT, AND THAT SHOULD WORRY EVERYONE A U.S. F-35, the crown jewel of modern airpower, just limped home after taking fire over Iran. Not destroyed. Not confirmed shot down. But hit. And that alone changes the conversation. For years, the F-35 has been sold as invisible, untouchable. A jet designed to slip through enemy airspace like a ghost. So what happened? First, let’s kill the myth: stealth does not mean invisible. Every aircraft reflects radar. The trick is reducing that signal, bending it, scattering it, shrinking it into something harder to detect. Harder. Not impossible. And that distinction may be the whole story. Because the skies over Iran right now aren’t a one-off mission. They’re crowded, repetitive, predictable. F-35s have been flying there a lot. Same routes. Same altitudes. Same mission profiles. That matters. Air defense isn’t static. It learns. Modern systems don’t just “see” aircraft; they collect data over time. Patterns. Angles. Frequencies. Tiny radar returns that look like noise until they don’t. Do that enough times, and the noise starts to look like a signature. Then there’s the second possibility: this wasn’t just Iranian ingenuity. Iran doesn’t build its air defense ecosystem in isolation. It buys. It reverse-engineers. It integrates. Russia has spent years refining systems specifically designed to counter Western stealth. China has invested heavily in multi-band radar, systems that trade precision for detection, spotting stealth aircraft at longer ranges even if they can’t track them perfectly. Individually, these systems have limits. Together? They create something closer to a net. The third explanation is the simplest and the least comfortable: War is messy. Even the most advanced aircraft in history can be hit under the right conditions. A lucky shot. A brief exposure. A pilot forced into a less-than-ideal flight path. The same conflict has already seen drones shot down, friendly fire incidents, and dense, overlapping air defenses lighting up the sky. In that environment, “stealth” becomes less of a shield and more of an advantage, one that can be eroded. If Iran, with a patchwork of imported systems and domestic improvisation, can even touch an F-35, then the future of air warfare looks very different than advertised.

Mario Nawfal

701,946 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

‼️🇸🇪 Sweden’s Air Force has confirmed its Gripen E fighters are now fully capable of detecting and engaging slow, low-flying threats like Shahed drones a critical adaptation in an era where air defense is no longer just about dogfights, but drone swarms. During NATO air policing in Poland, Swedish pilots verified radar and software upgrades that allow the Gripen to track and destroy FPV and loitering munitions previously considered “invisible” to legacy jets. This capability, combined with advanced electronic warfare suites and networked data-sharing, transforms the Gripen from a traditional air-superiority platform into a multi-role sentinel against hybrid threats. As Russian and Iranian drones proliferate across Europe, Sweden’s focus on survivability, stealth, and rapid tech insertion like fielding Taurus missiles years ahead of schedule shows how even small air forces can outmaneuver larger ones by prioritizing adaptability over brute force.

‼️🇸🇪 Sweden’s Air Force has confirmed its Gripen E fighters are now fully capable of detecting and engaging slow, low-flying threats like Shahed drones a critical adaptation in an era where air defense is no longer just about dogfights, but drone swarms. During NATO air policing in Poland, Swedish pilots verified radar and software upgrades that allow the Gripen to track and destroy FPV and loitering munitions previously considered “invisible” to legacy jets. This capability, combined with advanced electronic warfare suites and networked data-sharing, transforms the Gripen from a traditional air-superiority platform into a multi-role sentinel against hybrid threats. As Russian and Iranian drones proliferate across Europe, Sweden’s focus on survivability, stealth, and rapid tech insertion like fielding Taurus missiles years ahead of schedule shows how even small air forces can outmaneuver larger ones by prioritizing adaptability over brute force.

Visioner

288,284 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

TRILLION-DOLLAR DEFENSE BUDGET, EMPTY MISSILE STOCKPILES. THE MILITARY‑INDUSTRIAL SCAM ON TAXPAYERS EXPOSED Russia hit Kyiv this week with at least two dozen Iskander‑M and S‑400 ballistic missiles, four hypersonic cruise missiles, and more than 100 drones. Warehouses, logistics hubs, industrial sites, and a major shopping center were struck. Ukraine did not intercept a single one of the 28 missiles, because officials say their last Patriot interceptors were fired days earlier. This comes as President Trump has denied Zelenskyy’s request for more Patriot missiles, saying U.S. stockpiles are needed in the Middle East. That leaves the U.S., NATO, and Ukraine in a strategic bind: two active wars, in Ukraine and the Middle East, both drawing from the same limited pool of missile interceptors. A single Patriot battery costs around $1.1 billion, and each PAC‑3 interceptor costs about $4 million and takes more than two years to produce. The U.S. currently turns out fewer than 1,000 Patriot interceptors a year. Even with planned factory expansions, output would still be under 3,000 annually. Levels that now look badly mismatched to real wartime demand. If the U.S. cannot produce air defense missiles faster than adversaries can force them to be used, the problem is no longer confined to Kyiv’s skies or the Middle East. It is a systemic American defense industrial problem. Ben Freeman joins me to break this down.

TRILLION-DOLLAR DEFENSE BUDGET, EMPTY MISSILE STOCKPILES. THE MILITARY‑INDUSTRIAL SCAM ON TAXPAYERS EXPOSED Russia hit Kyiv this week with at least two dozen Iskander‑M and S‑400 ballistic missiles, four hypersonic cruise missiles, and more than 100 drones. Warehouses, logistics hubs, industrial sites, and a major shopping center were struck. Ukraine did not intercept a single one of the 28 missiles, because officials say their last Patriot interceptors were fired days earlier. This comes as President Trump has denied Zelenskyy’s request for more Patriot missiles, saying U.S. stockpiles are needed in the Middle East. That leaves the U.S., NATO, and Ukraine in a strategic bind: two active wars, in Ukraine and the Middle East, both drawing from the same limited pool of missile interceptors. A single Patriot battery costs around $1.1 billion, and each PAC‑3 interceptor costs about $4 million and takes more than two years to produce. The U.S. currently turns out fewer than 1,000 Patriot interceptors a year. Even with planned factory expansions, output would still be under 3,000 annually. Levels that now look badly mismatched to real wartime demand. If the U.S. cannot produce air defense missiles faster than adversaries can force them to be used, the problem is no longer confined to Kyiv’s skies or the Middle East. It is a systemic American defense industrial problem. Ben Freeman joins me to break this down.

Ben Swann

23,305 просмотров • 8 дней назад