Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Naval Ravikant reveals the framework for finding the life you were actually built for "2,000 years ago you're born on a farm. Your choices are very limited. Now you can wake up and move to a different city. You can switch careers, switch jobs, change the people you're with"...

jaynitx's profile picture

Jaynit

53,300 subscribers

49,318 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationHealth & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Don’t be confused by how the story ends- choose Hope my friends - get the cynicism and negativity and pessimism out of your system. For so many of you who see this post, that framework of what you're looking for has been crushing you, not in a good way, crushing you and hurting you over the last five years. So many people are caught up in the drama and the bullshit that so many are pushing on you because they can control you when you're scared. I promise it's much more fun to choose hope and optimism, especially when it's grounded in patience, accountability, and most of all, practical truth. This is your chance to use this post to wake you up to the fact that the people that are most controlling you are the ones that scare you the most and try to infiltrate you to deploy hate and fear
0:32

Don’t be confused by how the story ends- choose Hope my friends - get the cynicism and negativity and pessimism out of your system. For so many of you who see this post, that framework of what you're looking for has been crushing you, not in a good way, crushing you and hurting you over the last five years. So many people are caught up in the drama and the bullshit that so many are pushing on you because they can control you when you're scared. I promise it's much more fun to choose hope and optimism, especially when it's grounded in patience, accountability, and most of all, practical truth. This is your chance to use this post to wake you up to the fact that the people that are most controlling you are the ones that scare you the most and try to infiltrate you to deploy hate and fear

Gary Vaynerchuk

16,714 views • 2 months ago

"Allowing People to Diminish You is a Violent Act Against Yourself" Keke Palmer: Oprah, what is the single biggest mistake people make in their relationships with others? Oprah Winfrey: You are abusing yourself if you allow other people to be in your life to diminish you. You are punishing yourself it is a violent act against yourself to allow other people in your life to diminish you and not lift you and exalt you. Keke Palmer: Wow... that hits so deep. Oprah Winfrey: If you don't have people who see you for the light that you are, for the joy that you are, for the goodness that you bring... you are with the wrong people! I don't care how that shows up in your life. The reason that person keeps showing up in your life is for you to make the change. You can't change them. Keke Palmer: Absolutely. It’s like guiding yourself back to your own power rather than waiting for someone else to change. Oprah Winfrey: Exactly. You have had the power all along—you just have to remember it.
1:02

"Allowing People to Diminish You is a Violent Act Against Yourself" Keke Palmer: Oprah, what is the single biggest mistake people make in their relationships with others? Oprah Winfrey: You are abusing yourself if you allow other people to be in your life to diminish you. You are punishing yourself it is a violent act against yourself to allow other people in your life to diminish you and not lift you and exalt you. Keke Palmer: Wow... that hits so deep. Oprah Winfrey: If you don't have people who see you for the light that you are, for the joy that you are, for the goodness that you bring... you are with the wrong people! I don't care how that shows up in your life. The reason that person keeps showing up in your life is for you to make the change. You can't change them. Keke Palmer: Absolutely. It’s like guiding yourself back to your own power rather than waiting for someone else to change. Oprah Winfrey: Exactly. You have had the power all along—you just have to remember it.

FlickHub

25,200 views • 5 days ago

We're being lied to, robbed blind, infiltrated, and invaded, children are being trafficked, abused, and used as blackmail tools on our own government officials and other elite individuals for control and for the lust of power itself. Remember, when all falls down, your family will probably be the only ones who are there for you, some friends too if you're lucky, but in reality, most people just want something from you and don't care at all. Appreciate the life you were given and treat others how you want to be treated. You know, deep down, something is very wrong in this world. I know you can feel it. The question is, what do you want to be remembered for? Are you going to sit around and do nothing, or are you going to stand up and speak up and make a difference? In the end, it's up to you and you alone. It's time to wake up.
2:10

We're being lied to, robbed blind, infiltrated, and invaded, children are being trafficked, abused, and used as blackmail tools on our own government officials and other elite individuals for control and for the lust of power itself. Remember, when all falls down, your family will probably be the only ones who are there for you, some friends too if you're lucky, but in reality, most people just want something from you and don't care at all. Appreciate the life you were given and treat others how you want to be treated. You know, deep down, something is very wrong in this world. I know you can feel it. The question is, what do you want to be remembered for? Are you going to sit around and do nothing, or are you going to stand up and speak up and make a difference? In the end, it's up to you and you alone. It's time to wake up.

The SCIF

38,307 views • 7 months ago

Want to make physical products? You must go to Shenzhen, China. This video explains why and will tell you why your life either must be: A. Opportunity THEN City or B. City THEN Opportunity If there is something that you want to do, you need to move to the right city for it (Opportunity THEN City) If you're stuck in a particular place, you must adapt what you do to where you live (City THEN Opportunity) This is very important life lesson. Pursuing an opportunity that your city is not ideal for will cause you a lot of hardship. If you're set on an opportunity, you gotta move to the place that gives you the best chance of achieving it eg moving to Los Angeles to become an actor or New York to do finance. If family or some other reason keeps you in a specific place, you must, sadly adapt your goals to where you live eg getting into agriculture if you live in Iowa or tech if you live in Silicon Valley. Be bold, move across the world to achieve or your goals. Or, don't, and be practical about your ambitions. Combine the two and you will be unhappy.
3:52

Want to make physical products? You must go to Shenzhen, China. This video explains why and will tell you why your life either must be: A. Opportunity THEN City or B. City THEN Opportunity If there is something that you want to do, you need to move to the right city for it (Opportunity THEN City) If you're stuck in a particular place, you must adapt what you do to where you live (City THEN Opportunity) This is very important life lesson. Pursuing an opportunity that your city is not ideal for will cause you a lot of hardship. If you're set on an opportunity, you gotta move to the place that gives you the best chance of achieving it eg moving to Los Angeles to become an actor or New York to do finance. If family or some other reason keeps you in a specific place, you must, sadly adapt your goals to where you live eg getting into agriculture if you live in Iowa or tech if you live in Silicon Valley. Be bold, move across the world to achieve or your goals. Or, don't, and be practical about your ambitions. Combine the two and you will be unhappy.

molson 🧠⚙️

278,335 views • 1 year ago

Steve Jobs on why everything around you was made by people no smarter than you: "When you grow up, you tend to get told that the world is the way it is and your life is just to live your life inside the world. Try not to bash into the walls too much, have a nice family life, have fun, save a little money. But that's a very limited life." Steve believed most people live with a fundamental misconception. As he puts it: "Life can be much broader once you discover one simple fact. And that is—everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you." He continues: "And you can change it. You can influence it. You can build your own things that other people can use. And the minute that you understand that you can poke life and actually something will pop out the other side—that you can change it, you can mold it." On what matters most: "Maybe the most important thing is to shake off this erroneous notion that life is there and you're just going to live in it versus embrace it, change it, improve it, make your mark upon it. I think that's very important." His perspective on why you should change things: "However you learn that, once you learn it, you'll want to change life and make it better because it's kind of messed up in a lot of ways." The shift: "Once you learn that, you'll never be the same again."
1:28

Steve Jobs on why everything around you was made by people no smarter than you: "When you grow up, you tend to get told that the world is the way it is and your life is just to live your life inside the world. Try not to bash into the walls too much, have a nice family life, have fun, save a little money. But that's a very limited life." Steve believed most people live with a fundamental misconception. As he puts it: "Life can be much broader once you discover one simple fact. And that is—everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you." He continues: "And you can change it. You can influence it. You can build your own things that other people can use. And the minute that you understand that you can poke life and actually something will pop out the other side—that you can change it, you can mold it." On what matters most: "Maybe the most important thing is to shake off this erroneous notion that life is there and you're just going to live in it versus embrace it, change it, improve it, make your mark upon it. I think that's very important." His perspective on why you should change things: "However you learn that, once you learn it, you'll want to change life and make it better because it's kind of messed up in a lot of ways." The shift: "Once you learn that, you'll never be the same again."

Jaynit

48,518 views • 6 months ago

James Cameron: “This is why I love New Zealand. People there are, for the most part, sane as opposed to the United States where you had a 62% vaccination rate, and that’s going down, going the wrong direction. Where would you rather live? A place that actually believes in science and is sane and where people can work together cohesively to a common goal, or a place where everybody’s at each other’s throats, extremely polarized, turning its back on science and basically would be in utter disarray if another pandemic appears? I’m not there for the scenery, I’m there for the sanity.”
1:21

James Cameron: “This is why I love New Zealand. People there are, for the most part, sane as opposed to the United States where you had a 62% vaccination rate, and that’s going down, going the wrong direction. Where would you rather live? A place that actually believes in science and is sane and where people can work together cohesively to a common goal, or a place where everybody’s at each other’s throats, extremely polarized, turning its back on science and basically would be in utter disarray if another pandemic appears? I’m not there for the scenery, I’m there for the sanity.”

Marco Foster

793,475 views • 6 months ago

Naval Ravikant: "The only true test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life" "There are two parts to that. One is getting what you want, so you know how to get it. The second is wanting the right things, knowing what to want in the first place. I could want to be a 6'8" basketball player and I'm not going to get that. That's wanting something you can't get. But there's also wanting something that's a booby prize, prizes that are just not worth having, or that create their own problems." Naval explains how people end up in places they never meant to be: "If you're not careful, you can end up in a place in life not only that you don't want to be, but one you didn't even mean to get to. Usually people end up there because they're going on autopilot with societal expectations. Or out of guilt. Or out of mimetic desire, our desires are picked up from other people. Go to law school, go to med school, go to business school. Or it might be what your parents expect. Guilt is just society's voice speaking in your head so you'll be a good little monkey." He shares a problem most people have: "We run on these four-year cycles. You join a startup, you vest over four years. College is four years. High school is four years. You go to law school, that's a 5-year cycle. You become a lawyer, that's a 40-year cycle. These are very long cycles. But the amount of time we spend deciding what to do and who to do it with? Very short. We spend one month deciding on a job where we're going to be for 10 years." Naval's rule: "If you're making a four-year decision, spend a year thinking it through. Really thinking it through. 25% of the time." He explains the Secretary Theorem: "It turns out the optimal time to search is about a third. By a third of the way through, you've seen enough to know what the bar is. Then anybody who meets or exceeds that bar is good enough. But here's the key: it's not time-based. It's iteration-based. You need to take opportunities quickly and bail out quickly. If you look at failed relationships, the biggest regret is usually staying after you knew it was over." Naval reframes the 10,000 hour rule: "Malcolm Gladwell popularized 10,000 hours to mastery. I'd say it's actually 10,000 iterations to mastery. Iteration is not repetition. Repetition is doing the same thing over and over. Iteration is modifying it with learning and doing another version. That's error correction. If you get 10,000 error corrections in anything, you will be an expert." On pessimism vs. optimism: "You want to be skeptical about specific things, every specific opportunity is probably a fail. But you want to be optimistic in the general. Something in here is going to work out. If something fails, it was a learning experience. It was an iteration. As long as you learned something, it's a win. You don't want to jump into the first thing. But once you find the match, you have to be willing to go all in. Move your chips to the center of the table." He concludes: "Most people are stuck in this gray bit. 'I'm half in, but I don't really know.' That doesn't work. It's a barbell strategy, black or white. Explore quickly, cut losses fast. Then when you find the right thing, compound into it."
10:05

Naval Ravikant: "The only true test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life" "There are two parts to that. One is getting what you want, so you know how to get it. The second is wanting the right things, knowing what to want in the first place. I could want to be a 6'8" basketball player and I'm not going to get that. That's wanting something you can't get. But there's also wanting something that's a booby prize, prizes that are just not worth having, or that create their own problems." Naval explains how people end up in places they never meant to be: "If you're not careful, you can end up in a place in life not only that you don't want to be, but one you didn't even mean to get to. Usually people end up there because they're going on autopilot with societal expectations. Or out of guilt. Or out of mimetic desire, our desires are picked up from other people. Go to law school, go to med school, go to business school. Or it might be what your parents expect. Guilt is just society's voice speaking in your head so you'll be a good little monkey." He shares a problem most people have: "We run on these four-year cycles. You join a startup, you vest over four years. College is four years. High school is four years. You go to law school, that's a 5-year cycle. You become a lawyer, that's a 40-year cycle. These are very long cycles. But the amount of time we spend deciding what to do and who to do it with? Very short. We spend one month deciding on a job where we're going to be for 10 years." Naval's rule: "If you're making a four-year decision, spend a year thinking it through. Really thinking it through. 25% of the time." He explains the Secretary Theorem: "It turns out the optimal time to search is about a third. By a third of the way through, you've seen enough to know what the bar is. Then anybody who meets or exceeds that bar is good enough. But here's the key: it's not time-based. It's iteration-based. You need to take opportunities quickly and bail out quickly. If you look at failed relationships, the biggest regret is usually staying after you knew it was over." Naval reframes the 10,000 hour rule: "Malcolm Gladwell popularized 10,000 hours to mastery. I'd say it's actually 10,000 iterations to mastery. Iteration is not repetition. Repetition is doing the same thing over and over. Iteration is modifying it with learning and doing another version. That's error correction. If you get 10,000 error corrections in anything, you will be an expert." On pessimism vs. optimism: "You want to be skeptical about specific things, every specific opportunity is probably a fail. But you want to be optimistic in the general. Something in here is going to work out. If something fails, it was a learning experience. It was an iteration. As long as you learned something, it's a win. You don't want to jump into the first thing. But once you find the match, you have to be willing to go all in. Move your chips to the center of the table." He concludes: "Most people are stuck in this gray bit. 'I'm half in, but I don't really know.' That doesn't work. It's a barbell strategy, black or white. Explore quickly, cut losses fast. Then when you find the right thing, compound into it."

Jaynit

74,340 views • 4 months ago

Free speech is not for the speech you like or for the people you like. Free speech is for the speech that you hate of the people you despise. If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution. Full Video:
1:16

Free speech is not for the speech you like or for the people you like. Free speech is for the speech that you hate of the people you despise. If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution. Full Video:

Jimmy Dore

69,678 views • 1 year ago

David Lammy, "Hamas is not the Palestinian people" "A Palestinian state is a just cause" "Our country 108 years ago signed up to the Balflour declaration" "We believed in a homeland for the Jewish people but we also stated that we believe in the civil and religious rights of the Palestinian people" "Now is the time to stand up for the two states" "Otherwise you're effectively saying you believe in no state for the Palestinian people, or one state in which you would have to explain there is proper equality before the law for the Palestinian people"
0:48

David Lammy, "Hamas is not the Palestinian people" "A Palestinian state is a just cause" "Our country 108 years ago signed up to the Balflour declaration" "We believed in a homeland for the Jewish people but we also stated that we believe in the civil and religious rights of the Palestinian people" "Now is the time to stand up for the two states" "Otherwise you're effectively saying you believe in no state for the Palestinian people, or one state in which you would have to explain there is proper equality before the law for the Palestinian people"

Farrukh

284,459 views • 10 months ago

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang said this 22 years ago: “I don’t need to change the world overnight. I’m going to change the world over the next 50 years. I don’t need to build a killer product overnight. I just need to build a winning product. And the goal of winning is so that you can play again. It’s just like pinball, OK? If you could just play well enough to get another game, you could be there for a long time. Most companies just need to realize that, in fact, this is a long road and that you can’t build that perfect product. So once you do that, then you keep the project’s scope confined. You keep the project now simple. You have a long-term vision, but your product definition is rather simple. You execute flawlessly on that because your people now can execute flawlessly on a simple plan, and you come back and do it again.”
1:31

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang said this 22 years ago: “I don’t need to change the world overnight. I’m going to change the world over the next 50 years. I don’t need to build a killer product overnight. I just need to build a winning product. And the goal of winning is so that you can play again. It’s just like pinball, OK? If you could just play well enough to get another game, you could be there for a long time. Most companies just need to realize that, in fact, this is a long road and that you can’t build that perfect product. So once you do that, then you keep the project’s scope confined. You keep the project now simple. You have a long-term vision, but your product definition is rather simple. You execute flawlessly on that because your people now can execute flawlessly on a simple plan, and you come back and do it again.”

Nic Cruz Patane

375,178 views • 7 months ago

Naval Ravikant on why it's 10,000 iterations, not 10,000 hours: "The only true test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life. And there are two parts to that: one is getting what you want, so you know how to get it. And the second is wanting the right things, knowing what to want in the first place." Naval believes most people are proceeding unconsciously through life. As he puts it: "If you're not careful you can end up in a place in life not only that you don't want to be, but one that you didn't even mean to get to. Usually, people end up there because they are going on autopilot with societal expectations or people's expectations. Out of guilt or mimetic desire, our desires are picked up from other people." On how little time we spend deciding: "We run on these four-year cycles. You go join a startup, you vest your stock over four years. College you go for four years, high school you go for four years. These are very long cycles, the amount of time we spend deciding what to do and who to do it with? Very short. Very, very short." He continues: "We spend three months deciding, one month deciding on a job where we're going to be for 10 years or 5 years. People decide frivolously which city to live in and that's going to decide who their friends are, what their jobs are, their opportunity, their weather, their food supply, their air supply, quality of life. It's such an important decision but people spend so little time thinking it through." His rule: "I would argue that if you're making a four-year decision, spend a year thinking it through. Like really thinking it. 25% of the time." On the secretary theorem: "The optimal time to search is somewhere around a third of the way through. You take the best person you've worked with and try to find someone that good or better. By the time you've got about a third of the way through, you have seen enough that you now have a sense of what the bar is. Then anybody who meets or exceeds that bar is good enough." But here's the catch: "It's actually not time-based; it's not based on one-third of the time, it's iteration-based. The number of candidates, the number of shots you took on goal. So you want to have lots and lots of iterations. You need to bail out quickly, and you need to be decisive quickly." On failed relationships: "If you go back and you look through failed relationships, probably the biggest regret will be staying in the relationship after you knew it was over. The moment you knew it wasn't going to work out, you should have moved on." His reframe of Malcolm Gladwell's 10,000 hours: "I would say it's actually 10,000 iterations to Mastery. It's not actually 10,000; it's some unknown number, but it's about the number of iterations that drives a learning curve. Iteration is not repetition—repetition is doing the same thing over and over. Iteration is modifying it with a learning and then doing another version of it. That's error correction." On modern society: "Modern society is far more forgiving of failure. Once you find the one business you're meant to plow into and compound returns, it's okay if you had 50 small failed ventures or 50 small failed job interviews. The number of failures doesn't matter." His approach: "You want to be skeptical about specific things—every specific opportunity is probably a fail. But you want to be optimistic in the general. Something in here is going to work out. You want to investigate and explore very, very quickly until you find the match. And then you have to be willing to go all in." On labels: "Labels like pessimist, optimist, cynic, introvert, extrovert, these are very self-limiting. Don't define yourself by trauma or PTSD because then you lock it into your identity and you're just going to loop on it. It's better to stay flexible because reality is always changing and you have to be able to adapt to it." Spend a year deciding. Take 10,000 iterations. Then go all in.
10:05

Naval Ravikant on why it's 10,000 iterations, not 10,000 hours: "The only true test of intelligence is if you get what you want out of life. And there are two parts to that: one is getting what you want, so you know how to get it. And the second is wanting the right things, knowing what to want in the first place." Naval believes most people are proceeding unconsciously through life. As he puts it: "If you're not careful you can end up in a place in life not only that you don't want to be, but one that you didn't even mean to get to. Usually, people end up there because they are going on autopilot with societal expectations or people's expectations. Out of guilt or mimetic desire, our desires are picked up from other people." On how little time we spend deciding: "We run on these four-year cycles. You go join a startup, you vest your stock over four years. College you go for four years, high school you go for four years. These are very long cycles, the amount of time we spend deciding what to do and who to do it with? Very short. Very, very short." He continues: "We spend three months deciding, one month deciding on a job where we're going to be for 10 years or 5 years. People decide frivolously which city to live in and that's going to decide who their friends are, what their jobs are, their opportunity, their weather, their food supply, their air supply, quality of life. It's such an important decision but people spend so little time thinking it through." His rule: "I would argue that if you're making a four-year decision, spend a year thinking it through. Like really thinking it. 25% of the time." On the secretary theorem: "The optimal time to search is somewhere around a third of the way through. You take the best person you've worked with and try to find someone that good or better. By the time you've got about a third of the way through, you have seen enough that you now have a sense of what the bar is. Then anybody who meets or exceeds that bar is good enough." But here's the catch: "It's actually not time-based; it's not based on one-third of the time, it's iteration-based. The number of candidates, the number of shots you took on goal. So you want to have lots and lots of iterations. You need to bail out quickly, and you need to be decisive quickly." On failed relationships: "If you go back and you look through failed relationships, probably the biggest regret will be staying in the relationship after you knew it was over. The moment you knew it wasn't going to work out, you should have moved on." His reframe of Malcolm Gladwell's 10,000 hours: "I would say it's actually 10,000 iterations to Mastery. It's not actually 10,000; it's some unknown number, but it's about the number of iterations that drives a learning curve. Iteration is not repetition—repetition is doing the same thing over and over. Iteration is modifying it with a learning and then doing another version of it. That's error correction." On modern society: "Modern society is far more forgiving of failure. Once you find the one business you're meant to plow into and compound returns, it's okay if you had 50 small failed ventures or 50 small failed job interviews. The number of failures doesn't matter." His approach: "You want to be skeptical about specific things—every specific opportunity is probably a fail. But you want to be optimistic in the general. Something in here is going to work out. You want to investigate and explore very, very quickly until you find the match. And then you have to be willing to go all in." On labels: "Labels like pessimist, optimist, cynic, introvert, extrovert, these are very self-limiting. Don't define yourself by trauma or PTSD because then you lock it into your identity and you're just going to loop on it. It's better to stay flexible because reality is always changing and you have to be able to adapt to it." Spend a year deciding. Take 10,000 iterations. Then go all in.

Jaynit

68,707 views • 6 months ago

Lots of people doubted INFINITE for the past 5 years yet sunggyu proved them wrong. Years later you have built your own company, came back with an album and a concert for inspirits. We are so luck to have you, you did well Infinite! Thankyou we luv u!🥹💛
0:58

Lots of people doubted INFINITE for the past 5 years yet sunggyu proved them wrong. Years later you have built your own company, came back with an album and a concert for inspirits. We are so luck to have you, you did well Infinite! Thankyou we luv u!🥹💛

규 ♡ 13EGIN

43,295 views • 2 years ago

If you need to change to be the type your type wants, the only person stopping you is you. If your type still doesn't like you, you've probably bought into the delusion that you're a 10 just because you're a woman.
2:42

If you need to change to be the type your type wants, the only person stopping you is you. If your type still doesn't like you, you've probably bought into the delusion that you're a 10 just because you're a woman.

The Last Boy Scout

17,408 views • 1 month ago

Brian still spends over two hours a day on recruiting and personally hires the top 200 people at Airbnb. I loved this idea of being in the flow of talent to find the best people: "Don't do searches. Build pipelines. I try to map out all the best people in the Valley. So let's say I need to hire really good engineers. I don't do searches. I just informationally meet the best engineers in the world. Every meeting, the job is to get the next meeting, meet someone else. The mistake people make when they hire. They go, "I need to hire a blank." So they hire a search firm. They give you 50 profiles, and you pick the best one. That is the wrong way to do it. The best way to do it is pipeline recruiting. You're constantly recruiting, you're constantly meeting people. in advance of searches. And all of it is referral based. The two ways to find out if people are good – is to start with the results and work backwards to the people. Find an ad you like and figure out who made that ad. Start with the results. Work backwards to people. Don't start with the resume. The other thing to do is just keep asking people to build your Rolodex. The moment I find somebody that's really good, I ask them who all the best people they know are. And I build these little mafias and they tell you who the other good people are. I am the co-hiring manager for the top 200 people in the company. This is very radical. A lot of CEOs think it's their job to hire their executive team, and their executive team hires their team. I think that is fatal. You always want to be marrying up, hiring people of the future. It should be like we're reaching. If you can hire them without my help, we're not reaching far enough. You want to hire the very best person you can."
2:07

Brian still spends over two hours a day on recruiting and personally hires the top 200 people at Airbnb. I loved this idea of being in the flow of talent to find the best people: "Don't do searches. Build pipelines. I try to map out all the best people in the Valley. So let's say I need to hire really good engineers. I don't do searches. I just informationally meet the best engineers in the world. Every meeting, the job is to get the next meeting, meet someone else. The mistake people make when they hire. They go, "I need to hire a blank." So they hire a search firm. They give you 50 profiles, and you pick the best one. That is the wrong way to do it. The best way to do it is pipeline recruiting. You're constantly recruiting, you're constantly meeting people. in advance of searches. And all of it is referral based. The two ways to find out if people are good – is to start with the results and work backwards to the people. Find an ad you like and figure out who made that ad. Start with the results. Work backwards to people. Don't start with the resume. The other thing to do is just keep asking people to build your Rolodex. The moment I find somebody that's really good, I ask them who all the best people they know are. And I build these little mafias and they tell you who the other good people are. I am the co-hiring manager for the top 200 people in the company. This is very radical. A lot of CEOs think it's their job to hire their executive team, and their executive team hires their team. I think that is fatal. You always want to be marrying up, hiring people of the future. It should be like we're reaching. If you can hire them without my help, we're not reaching far enough. You want to hire the very best person you can."

Patrick OShaughnessy

316,842 views • 2 months ago

Most Accurate Pollster in America Reveals Trump’s Approval PEAKED With DOGE, Showing Fighting Corruption Wins Votes and Midterms. "They kicked DOGE out. You have Elon Musk out there saying, 'Well, we were only moderately or somewhat successful.' It was the most successful political thing that we've seen in decades. If you look at Google Trends, the week that Trump had a plus sixty percent approval rating was the same week that DOGE search volume peaked." "If you can show people that we have a long-term plan and we've delivered on a portion of it, you're giving people a reason to vote for you. People just need a reason to vote for Republicans. And all it needs to be is doing things for the American people with intent."
7:50

Most Accurate Pollster in America Reveals Trump’s Approval PEAKED With DOGE, Showing Fighting Corruption Wins Votes and Midterms. "They kicked DOGE out. You have Elon Musk out there saying, 'Well, we were only moderately or somewhat successful.' It was the most successful political thing that we've seen in decades. If you look at Google Trends, the week that Trump had a plus sixty percent approval rating was the same week that DOGE search volume peaked." "If you can show people that we have a long-term plan and we've delivered on a portion of it, you're giving people a reason to vote for you. People just need a reason to vote for Republicans. And all it needs to be is doing things for the American people with intent."

Benny Johnson

191,453 views • 7 months ago

.Alex Marlow reacts to the clip of rising left-wing star Jennifer Welch calling evangelical Christians "a cancer" and "the worst people in our country": "Those of you who are on the right, who are conservatives, you likely have a God-based life, a Bible-based life. Because of that, your faith is the most important thing to you. Then after that, probably your family, and then maybe your career or politics kind of coming in at three or four. When you're on the left at this moment in time, the secular left in the United States of America, particularly embodied by these middle-aged white liberal women -- who are leading the party, they're guiding the whole party. That is their core demographic. That is the most dependable Democrat demographic right now. Then you're living a life where politics is above all else. And when that happens, the ends start justifying the means for you. If you're going to if you believe that you can get closer to political victory by completely demonizing, smearing, slandering people with whom you disagree, even people of faith. And we know in this country that Christians donate the most to charity. They donate their most the most time to volunteer work. They have better criminal records. I mean, like every single thing imaginable, demographically. You want to be, borrowing from my friend Dennis [Prager], if you see people coming down the street walking towards you and you know that they just came from a Bible study, are you feeling better or worse? You're feeling better. But they vote wrong, according to Jennifer Welch. And that's the problem. They think that you are other. You deserve cancellation, smearing, slandering, lying, maybe even death. Maybe even being hung, as Rick Wilson said from the clip I played yesterday, so long as you're a Christian. And why is that? because you vote for conservatives. That's what they think of you. They hate you. Don't forget that."
3:25

.Alex Marlow reacts to the clip of rising left-wing star Jennifer Welch calling evangelical Christians "a cancer" and "the worst people in our country": "Those of you who are on the right, who are conservatives, you likely have a God-based life, a Bible-based life. Because of that, your faith is the most important thing to you. Then after that, probably your family, and then maybe your career or politics kind of coming in at three or four. When you're on the left at this moment in time, the secular left in the United States of America, particularly embodied by these middle-aged white liberal women -- who are leading the party, they're guiding the whole party. That is their core demographic. That is the most dependable Democrat demographic right now. Then you're living a life where politics is above all else. And when that happens, the ends start justifying the means for you. If you're going to if you believe that you can get closer to political victory by completely demonizing, smearing, slandering people with whom you disagree, even people of faith. And we know in this country that Christians donate the most to charity. They donate their most the most time to volunteer work. They have better criminal records. I mean, like every single thing imaginable, demographically. You want to be, borrowing from my friend Dennis [Prager], if you see people coming down the street walking towards you and you know that they just came from a Bible study, are you feeling better or worse? You're feeling better. But they vote wrong, according to Jennifer Welch. And that's the problem. They think that you are other. You deserve cancellation, smearing, slandering, lying, maybe even death. Maybe even being hung, as Rick Wilson said from the clip I played yesterday, so long as you're a Christian. And why is that? because you vote for conservatives. That's what they think of you. They hate you. Don't forget that."

Breitbart News

51,547 views • 5 months ago

Me: I try to look at data and trends rather than headlines, because headlines can give you a misleading picture of the state of the world. Something goes wrong every day — that’s guaranteed — and if you just look at something goes wrong and say, oh, things are getting worse, you might be forgetting all the things that went wrong in the past. Andrew Marr: And what we call the news is a long litany of all the things that are getting worse or going wrong. Me: Well, yes, it’s much easier for something bad to happen suddenly than for something good to happen. Good things either creep up on you a few percentage points a year, and sometimes can compound. So the fact that, for example, extreme poverty in the world has been declining and a billion people have escaped extreme poverty over the last 30 years — but not on Thursday — so it was never an event from the news. One of the biggest events in human history is something that most people have never even heard of. Andrew Marr LBC
0:51

Me: I try to look at data and trends rather than headlines, because headlines can give you a misleading picture of the state of the world. Something goes wrong every day — that’s guaranteed — and if you just look at something goes wrong and say, oh, things are getting worse, you might be forgetting all the things that went wrong in the past. Andrew Marr: And what we call the news is a long litany of all the things that are getting worse or going wrong. Me: Well, yes, it’s much easier for something bad to happen suddenly than for something good to happen. Good things either creep up on you a few percentage points a year, and sometimes can compound. So the fact that, for example, extreme poverty in the world has been declining and a billion people have escaped extreme poverty over the last 30 years — but not on Thursday — so it was never an event from the news. One of the biggest events in human history is something that most people have never even heard of. Andrew Marr LBC

Steven Pinker

100,917 views • 7 months ago

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller
1:14

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

259,092 views • 11 months ago