Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Navier–Stokes equation (2D incompressible), solved live numerically on a discrete grid ρ (∂u/∂t + u·∇u) = −∇p + μ Δu + f, ∇·u = 0 The ink (the white stuff on the left) is added so you can see the motion of the fluid.

41,249 views • 8 days ago •via X (Twitter)

14 Comments

dgero's profile picture
dgero7 days ago

Nice live visualization of the equations! Here’s a real-world laminar → turbulent transition in the Isar Canal (single frame vs. average from a 4K video).

🌍 📈 Ethan Connelly 🍻's profile picture
🌍 📈 Ethan Connelly 🍻8 days ago

Built something similar a while ago for reaction-diffusion patterns!

Sean Cook's profile picture
Sean Cook7 days ago

I enjoyed this.

Paata Ivanisvili's profile picture
Paata Ivanisvili7 days ago

I’ve watched this over and over, and it never gets boring

Matt Gibson's profile picture
Matt Gibson8 days ago

The contest/prize is rigged though because nature and reality is not smooth. Any thoughts on that?

Dezhe Jin's profile picture
Dezhe Jin7 days ago

Where is cascade to larger scales? 2D turbulence is very different from 3D turbulence. The movie says nothing about the correctness of the simulation

Reynolds BEng 2.20's profile picture
Reynolds BEng 2.208 days ago

PhDad. Appendix A, Project 2 Navier Stokes Solution

DaveJannis's profile picture
DaveJannis7 days ago

What does this conjecture try to prove/disprove...sry, im lost

S. L. U.'s profile picture
S. L. U.7 days ago

Awesome 👏

ⓧ augerd 🜏 ∞ 🜏's profile picture
ⓧ augerd 🜏 ∞ 🜏7 days ago

nice!

Dr. D 🌱's profile picture
Dr. D 🌱8 days ago

Now do 3D

mattyjags's profile picture
mattyjags7 days ago

Thats interesting as i dont see the way you designed said grid. I happen to know the only determanistic grid that can do this because i built it....the question then becomes why...

Ralf Stephan's profile picture
Ralf Stephan7 days ago

That looks very fractaly.

Joe Maj's profile picture
Joe Maj7 days ago

How about air over an airfoil, Reynolds number ~10^6

Related Videos