Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Navier–Stokes equation (2D incompressible), solved live numerically on a discrete grid ρ (∂u/∂t + u·∇u) = −∇p + μ Δu + f, ∇·u = 0 The ink (the white stuff on the left) is added so you can see the motion of the fluid.

41,249 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 14

Фото профиля dgero
dgero7 дней назад

Nice live visualization of the equations! Here’s a real-world laminar → turbulent transition in the Isar Canal (single frame vs. average from a 4K video).

Фото профиля 🌍 📈 Ethan Connelly 🍻
🌍 📈 Ethan Connelly 🍻8 дней назад

Built something similar a while ago for reaction-diffusion patterns!

Фото профиля Sean Cook
Sean Cook7 дней назад

I enjoyed this.

Фото профиля Paata Ivanisvili
Paata Ivanisvili7 дней назад

I’ve watched this over and over, and it never gets boring

Фото профиля Matt Gibson
Matt Gibson8 дней назад

The contest/prize is rigged though because nature and reality is not smooth. Any thoughts on that?

Фото профиля Dezhe Jin
Dezhe Jin7 дней назад

Where is cascade to larger scales? 2D turbulence is very different from 3D turbulence. The movie says nothing about the correctness of the simulation

Фото профиля Reynolds BEng 2.20
Reynolds BEng 2.208 дней назад

PhDad. Appendix A, Project 2 Navier Stokes Solution

Фото профиля DaveJannis
DaveJannis7 дней назад

What does this conjecture try to prove/disprove...sry, im lost

Фото профиля S. L. U.
S. L. U.7 дней назад

Awesome 👏

Фото профиля ⓧ augerd 🜏 ∞ 🜏
ⓧ augerd 🜏 ∞ 🜏8 дней назад

nice!

Фото профиля Dr. D 🌱
Dr. D 🌱8 дней назад

Now do 3D

Фото профиля mattyjags
mattyjags7 дней назад

Thats interesting as i dont see the way you designed said grid. I happen to know the only determanistic grid that can do this because i built it....the question then becomes why...

Фото профиля Ralf Stephan
Ralf Stephan7 дней назад

That looks very fractaly.

Фото профиля Joe Maj
Joe Maj7 дней назад

How about air over an airfoil, Reynolds number ~10^6

Похожие видео