Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

NBA LEGEND Rasheed Wallace dropping some serious knowledge Underrated historically Elite inside/outside hooper (Via HoopDreamsBball🏀🧠 🎥)

Hoop Herald

79,078 subscribers

327,298 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Sports News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Chad Elsey1 year ago

No. Rasheed Wallace absolutely underachieved on his talent and it should be noted. One of the most talented players in NBA history and he never averaged a double-double and never, in any season avg 20 pts OR 10 rebs. Never made any ALL-NBA team. Let’s call it what it was. Lunatic with special talent, should have been more, but at least he entertained us.

American Stories Network1 year ago

Legends are made, not born. ⚔️ Watch competitors battle it out on Surviving Mann and see who earns the title of MVP! #SurvivingMann #LegendsInTheMaking #NavySEALs #SpecOps

Tim Cook1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball One of the most undervalued underrated, power forward, hybrid forward of all time, phenomenal player I have him in the top 25 players of all time. Kevin Garnett too ✊🏼♥️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🏀🏀🏀🏀💯💯

Kimbo!!!1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball That’s in Memphis at southwest community college

Patrick Pollock1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball "Break his wrist!" A good hard rip through can be all you need to get the step or two to the rim. If they reach, you teach.

J.Hopp💯✊🏾1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball It’s all about efficiency and attacking the rim with bad intentions at that level

Will Mock1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball Sheed would have been a perennial all-star during this era of the NBA

E Honda1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball Sheed was unbelievable

Damien1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball UNC legend…

Swingin' Charts1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball Former Trailblazer but those Pistons teams were nasty, great era.

reMARKable 5️⃣1 year ago

@hoopdreamsbball at that top level everybody damn near has the talent to be the best but their minds aren’t where they need to be that’s what separates mfs. Sheed went in games ready to murder mfs 😭

Related Videos

Free Game from An NBA Legend There is so much valuable insight available if learning the game matters to you (Via HoopDreamsBball🏀🧠 🎥)

Free Game from An NBA Legend There is so much valuable insight available if learning the game matters to you (Via HoopDreamsBball🏀🧠 🎥)

Hoop Herald

35,565 views • 7 months ago

Former NBA guard Jeff McGinnis has been an elite trainer for quite some time This is great work (Via Jeff McInnis 🎥)

Former NBA guard Jeff McGinnis has been an elite trainer for quite some time This is great work (Via Jeff McInnis 🎥)

Hoop Herald

78,799 views • 1 year ago

The ability to go slow to fast is an elite skill that the best guards rep You can’t be a really good Hooper if you go ONE SPEED all time (Via NBA Trainer Coach P 🎥)

The ability to go slow to fast is an elite skill that the best guards rep You can’t be a really good Hooper if you go ONE SPEED all time (Via NBA Trainer Coach P 🎥)

Hoop Herald

19,574 views • 10 months ago

The number one Hooper in the class of 2025, Aaliyah Chavez, made an outside the box choice committing to Oklahoma Look for her to put up MASSIVE numbers for the Sooners on high volume An elite, elite prospect ✨ (Via Courtside Films 🎥)

The number one Hooper in the class of 2025, Aaliyah Chavez, made an outside the box choice committing to Oklahoma Look for her to put up MASSIVE numbers for the Sooners on high volume An elite, elite prospect ✨ (Via Courtside Films 🎥)

Hoop Herald

103,495 views • 1 year ago

Kamaru Usman 🤝 Khamzat Chimaev One of the best inside and outside the Octagon, Kamaru with the elite breakdown of Borz' dominant title display 🧠 🎥 YT/Pound 4 Pound with Kamaru & Henry

Kamaru Usman 🤝 Khamzat Chimaev One of the best inside and outside the Octagon, Kamaru with the elite breakdown of Borz' dominant title display 🧠 🎥 YT/Pound 4 Pound with Kamaru & Henry

UFC on TNT Sports

95,738 views • 11 months ago

“If I was playing today, I would be wearing those suckers…and I’d be dropping 50pts!” —Patrick Ewing You already know we had to get on the legend about his knee pads 😂Knee pads and all- Patrick Ewing faced some of the best centers in basketball history, SHAQ Hakeem Olajuwon David Robinson, but he tells us who was the most difficult to play against…🏀 Full episode streaming now on all audio platforms and YouTube #nba #basketball #podcast #knicks Ryan Clark Fred Taylor Channing Crowder

“If I was playing today, I would be wearing those suckers…and I’d be dropping 50pts!” —Patrick Ewing You already know we had to get on the legend about his knee pads 😂Knee pads and all- Patrick Ewing faced some of the best centers in basketball history, SHAQ Hakeem Olajuwon David Robinson, but he tells us who was the most difficult to play against…🏀 Full episode streaming now on all audio platforms and YouTube #nba #basketball #podcast #knicks Ryan Clark Fred Taylor Channing Crowder

Pivot Podcast

26,505 views • 3 months ago

We were told EMFs only affect the body but the truth is way darker. And to be honest, most people aren’t ready to have these conversations. ⚠️ EMFs don’t just disrupt your body. They hack your thoughts. According to @vibeauraholisticpractice, as soon as she started sleeping with an EMF-blocking hoodie, her dreams and memory loss disappeared. 🌐 But without the hoodie, she can’t remember things she just looked at seconds before. 🤯 I know this sounds “out there”. But it’s totally possible, and backed up with evidence. EMFs interfere with the neurons in our brain. 🧠 But worse, whistleblowers like Sabrina Wallace have long confirmed brain-computer interface, and under-the-skin biofield hacking technology used by the government and corporations. 🚨 Without your knowledge or consent! This is why it’s SO important to have a space where you can explore and ask these types of questions, and think for yourself. And that’s why I created the Healing Circle. We talk about the things that can’t get discussed on social media. And believe me, we go deep. 🐇🕳️ I share research, protocols, and real-world experiences with aligned guests who are experts in their field on the topics that would get me banned here. And we have live, monthly Q&As with thousands of like-minded people on the same wavelength. You don’t have to figure this all out alone! Here’s a link to join us inside the Healing Circle With love and truth, Dr. Edward Group, DC 🎥 Thank you @Vibeauraholisticpractice #emfs #transhumanism #truthseeker #questioneverything #thematrixisreal

We were told EMFs only affect the body but the truth is way darker. And to be honest, most people aren’t ready to have these conversations. ⚠️ EMFs don’t just disrupt your body. They hack your thoughts. According to @vibeauraholisticpractice, as soon as she started sleeping with an EMF-blocking hoodie, her dreams and memory loss disappeared. 🌐 But without the hoodie, she can’t remember things she just looked at seconds before. 🤯 I know this sounds “out there”. But it’s totally possible, and backed up with evidence. EMFs interfere with the neurons in our brain. 🧠 But worse, whistleblowers like Sabrina Wallace have long confirmed brain-computer interface, and under-the-skin biofield hacking technology used by the government and corporations. 🚨 Without your knowledge or consent! This is why it’s SO important to have a space where you can explore and ask these types of questions, and think for yourself. And that’s why I created the Healing Circle. We talk about the things that can’t get discussed on social media. And believe me, we go deep. 🐇🕳️ I share research, protocols, and real-world experiences with aligned guests who are experts in their field on the topics that would get me banned here. And we have live, monthly Q&As with thousands of like-minded people on the same wavelength. You don’t have to figure this all out alone! Here’s a link to join us inside the Healing Circle With love and truth, Dr. Edward Group, DC 🎥 Thank you @Vibeauraholisticpractice #emfs #transhumanism #truthseeker #questioneverything #thematrixisreal

Dr. Edward Group, DC

12,271 views • 3 months ago

(Phil Schneider + Ancient Knowledge + Modern Developments) If Phil Schneider was reporting what he believed to be true, and if ancient traditions were describing encounters as they understood them, how would the full picture look if it were internally consistent?🛸💫🐉👽🧠 Phil Schneider was not fundamentally saying “aliens secretly rule the world.” He was making a narrower and more destabilizing claim: Certain human institutions became aware of non-human intelligences or advanced technologies long ago, entered into secrecy-based arrangements, and reorganized power, infrastructure, and knowledge around classification rather than public legitimacy. The shift was not ideological, but structural: Power moved from shared authority → compartmentalized control. Connection to Ancient Traditions Across African, Egyptian, Sumerian, and Mesoamerican traditions, a consistent pattern appears: •Civilization is introduced, not invented •Knowledge comes from “others” (Nommo, Oannes, Chitauri, Serpent beings) •These beings are non-human, biologically distinct, often amphibious or subterranean •Authority is associated with anatomy: head shape, gaze, luminosity, longevity Hypothetically, ancient cultures preserved memories of encounters with advanced beings using the only frameworks available to them: myth, ritual, and anatomical symbolism. Why the Head shape, False Beard, and Anatomy Matters Cranial elongation, headdresses, and ritual beards become acts of imitation and lineage signaling. Credo Mutwa’s claim of a chin-growth or “beard” can be read as a remembered biological feature later reduced to symbolic regalia. Defacement of beards and facial features then reads not as vandalism, but as erasure of implication. Where Phil’s Underground Claims Fit Phil’s testimony introduces a modern continuation of the same pattern: •Non-human intelligences are not only “from the sky” •They are associated with subterranean environments •Some underground infrastructure is pre-existing •Advanced material science is involved •Presence is long-term, not episodic In this model, ancient “underworld” myths and serpent gods are not metaphors, but environmental descriptions filtered through mythic language. 5. Advanced Boring & Underground Bases Phil described tunneling that vitrifies rock, leaving glassy, sealed walls via non-mechanical excavation. Hypothetically, this could reflect: •Exposure to classified high-energy excavation research •Plasma or thermal boring concepts •Nuclear excavation studies (which historically existed) •Or partial repetition of briefings without full context The effects he described are real in physics. The interpretive leap is not the engineering — it is the attribution of non-human collaboration. Why This Resonates Today Governments now admit UAPs exist without explanation. Classified programs remain opaque. Whistleblowers are marginalized. Ancient cultures are being reassessed as more sophisticated than assumed. It feels like denial followed by partial admission — not confirmation, but resonance. Why Institutions Reject the Implications If humanity is not alone, civilization was externally influenced, and governments are not fully sovereign, then religious authority, political legitimacy, and public trust destabilize. Institutions respond with silence, reframing, delay, and minimization — not necessarily because of aliens, but because loss of control is unacceptable.

(Phil Schneider + Ancient Knowledge + Modern Developments) If Phil Schneider was reporting what he believed to be true, and if ancient traditions were describing encounters as they understood them, how would the full picture look if it were internally consistent?🛸💫🐉👽🧠 Phil Schneider was not fundamentally saying “aliens secretly rule the world.” He was making a narrower and more destabilizing claim: Certain human institutions became aware of non-human intelligences or advanced technologies long ago, entered into secrecy-based arrangements, and reorganized power, infrastructure, and knowledge around classification rather than public legitimacy. The shift was not ideological, but structural: Power moved from shared authority → compartmentalized control. Connection to Ancient Traditions Across African, Egyptian, Sumerian, and Mesoamerican traditions, a consistent pattern appears: •Civilization is introduced, not invented •Knowledge comes from “others” (Nommo, Oannes, Chitauri, Serpent beings) •These beings are non-human, biologically distinct, often amphibious or subterranean •Authority is associated with anatomy: head shape, gaze, luminosity, longevity Hypothetically, ancient cultures preserved memories of encounters with advanced beings using the only frameworks available to them: myth, ritual, and anatomical symbolism. Why the Head shape, False Beard, and Anatomy Matters Cranial elongation, headdresses, and ritual beards become acts of imitation and lineage signaling. Credo Mutwa’s claim of a chin-growth or “beard” can be read as a remembered biological feature later reduced to symbolic regalia. Defacement of beards and facial features then reads not as vandalism, but as erasure of implication. Where Phil’s Underground Claims Fit Phil’s testimony introduces a modern continuation of the same pattern: •Non-human intelligences are not only “from the sky” •They are associated with subterranean environments •Some underground infrastructure is pre-existing •Advanced material science is involved •Presence is long-term, not episodic In this model, ancient “underworld” myths and serpent gods are not metaphors, but environmental descriptions filtered through mythic language. 5. Advanced Boring & Underground Bases Phil described tunneling that vitrifies rock, leaving glassy, sealed walls via non-mechanical excavation. Hypothetically, this could reflect: •Exposure to classified high-energy excavation research •Plasma or thermal boring concepts •Nuclear excavation studies (which historically existed) •Or partial repetition of briefings without full context The effects he described are real in physics. The interpretive leap is not the engineering — it is the attribution of non-human collaboration. Why This Resonates Today Governments now admit UAPs exist without explanation. Classified programs remain opaque. Whistleblowers are marginalized. Ancient cultures are being reassessed as more sophisticated than assumed. It feels like denial followed by partial admission — not confirmation, but resonance. Why Institutions Reject the Implications If humanity is not alone, civilization was externally influenced, and governments are not fully sovereign, then religious authority, political legitimacy, and public trust destabilize. Institutions respond with silence, reframing, delay, and minimization — not necessarily because of aliens, but because loss of control is unacceptable.

Jack

28,633 views • 5 months ago

🚨 THE UFO FILES MAY REVEAL SOMETHING FAR BIGGER THAN ALIENS… THEY MAY REVEAL THE TRUE STORY OF HUMANITY 👽📜 Friends… I want you to prepare yourselves psychologically for what may be coming next. Because I do NOT believe the future UFO/UAP disclosures that the Pentagon are in the process of releasing are simply about videos and sightings of advanced craft. I believe they may ultimately force humanity to confront a terrifying & beautiful possibility: That WE may not be entirely “from Earth.” Now before sceptics laugh — understand this: Scientists are already openly discussing PANSPERMIA — the theory that life itself may have arrived here via asteroids, comets or cosmic debris. And if life came from elsewhere then WE are part of that cosmic lineage. But here's the thing: humans are an ANOMALY! We are physically fragile compared to many animals. Yet somehow we became dominant over the entire planet! We create art, technology, religion, civilisations, AI & spacecraft. And unlike every other species, we also store information OUTSIDE our genetics - creating what some scientists call a “dataome” - which we pass on to future generations e.g. all our communications, art, scientific knowledge & cultural artifacts It's almost as if humanity was designed to EVOLVE through consciousness itself. Could that be accidental? Or were we guided? Modified? SEEDED? I believe there are people inside governments who already know the answers to some of these questions. And I believe this is one reason why disclosure has been delayed for DECADES. Because the implications are not just scientific — they are spiritual, political & civilisational. There are even persistent rumours that senior religious figures, including the VATICAN & the POPE, have quietly been briefed behind closed doors in preparation for future revelations. Why would that happen unless world governments know the TRUTH will deeply affect our shared understanding of who we are? I believe we may discover that our true HOME is far beyond the stars & WE are ALIEN to earth. And that THEY have been watching, guiding and genetically ENGINEERING us from the very beginning! #Aliens #Disclosure #UFO

🚨 THE UFO FILES MAY REVEAL SOMETHING FAR BIGGER THAN ALIENS… THEY MAY REVEAL THE TRUE STORY OF HUMANITY 👽📜 Friends… I want you to prepare yourselves psychologically for what may be coming next. Because I do NOT believe the future UFO/UAP disclosures that the Pentagon are in the process of releasing are simply about videos and sightings of advanced craft. I believe they may ultimately force humanity to confront a terrifying & beautiful possibility: That WE may not be entirely “from Earth.” Now before sceptics laugh — understand this: Scientists are already openly discussing PANSPERMIA — the theory that life itself may have arrived here via asteroids, comets or cosmic debris. And if life came from elsewhere then WE are part of that cosmic lineage. But here's the thing: humans are an ANOMALY! We are physically fragile compared to many animals. Yet somehow we became dominant over the entire planet! We create art, technology, religion, civilisations, AI & spacecraft. And unlike every other species, we also store information OUTSIDE our genetics - creating what some scientists call a “dataome” - which we pass on to future generations e.g. all our communications, art, scientific knowledge & cultural artifacts It's almost as if humanity was designed to EVOLVE through consciousness itself. Could that be accidental? Or were we guided? Modified? SEEDED? I believe there are people inside governments who already know the answers to some of these questions. And I believe this is one reason why disclosure has been delayed for DECADES. Because the implications are not just scientific — they are spiritual, political & civilisational. There are even persistent rumours that senior religious figures, including the VATICAN & the POPE, have quietly been briefed behind closed doors in preparation for future revelations. Why would that happen unless world governments know the TRUTH will deeply affect our shared understanding of who we are? I believe we may discover that our true HOME is far beyond the stars & WE are ALIEN to earth. And that THEY have been watching, guiding and genetically ENGINEERING us from the very beginning! #Aliens #Disclosure #UFO

Uri Geller

150,992 views • 2 months ago

🚨 “Iranian propaganda is really helping us,” Sinwar’s “political theory,” and no condemnation of terrorist groups — Inside an "anti-imperialist" discussion featuring an Arizona State University professor On Lara Sheehi’s Psychic Militancy podcast, Sheehi, a former GWU professor, spoke with former VT professor Bikrum Gill and ASU’s Alexander Aviña. The entire conversation should set off alarms for anyone paying attention. At one point, they seriously entertain the “political theory of Yahya Sinwar” and go so far as to say that “we are so dependent on it today.” That alone should be disqualifying in any serious academic setting. But it does not stop there. Aviña leans directly into the idea that violence is not merely historically contingent or analytically understandable, but a moral right. He frames it in explicit terms, asking whether people have a “natural right to resist tyranny via armed struggle.” That is not detached scholarship or theoretical exploration. It is a moral endorsement of violence as a necessary political tool in a capitalist and “colonized” world. It is also worth noting that his academic expertise touches guerrilla insurgency movements in Latin America. Then comes the part that should really make people pause. In the same conversation, Aviña praises Iranian propaganda outright, saying, “Iranian propaganda is really helping us… they know what they’re doing.” A sitting American professor describing the information operations of a hostile regime as helpful is not normal, no matter how much some corners of academia try to dress it up as critical theory or anti-imperial analysis. The discussion keeps escalating from there. The group credits Hamas and Hezbollah with “bringing” political possibility into being, then takes the next step and argues that condemning those terrorist groups is itself immoral. What is especially telling is that Aviña acknowledges the line they are approaching, admitting that “we can get in trouble” and that there could be “legal proceedings” for saying these things. They know exactly how far they are pushing it, and they say it anyway. And through all of this, Aviña is not pushing back. He is not introducing caution, context, or even minimal skepticism. He is nodding along, reinforcing the arguments, and helping carry the conversation forward.

🚨 “Iranian propaganda is really helping us,” Sinwar’s “political theory,” and no condemnation of terrorist groups — Inside an "anti-imperialist" discussion featuring an Arizona State University professor On Lara Sheehi’s Psychic Militancy podcast, Sheehi, a former GWU professor, spoke with former VT professor Bikrum Gill and ASU’s Alexander Aviña. The entire conversation should set off alarms for anyone paying attention. At one point, they seriously entertain the “political theory of Yahya Sinwar” and go so far as to say that “we are so dependent on it today.” That alone should be disqualifying in any serious academic setting. But it does not stop there. Aviña leans directly into the idea that violence is not merely historically contingent or analytically understandable, but a moral right. He frames it in explicit terms, asking whether people have a “natural right to resist tyranny via armed struggle.” That is not detached scholarship or theoretical exploration. It is a moral endorsement of violence as a necessary political tool in a capitalist and “colonized” world. It is also worth noting that his academic expertise touches guerrilla insurgency movements in Latin America. Then comes the part that should really make people pause. In the same conversation, Aviña praises Iranian propaganda outright, saying, “Iranian propaganda is really helping us… they know what they’re doing.” A sitting American professor describing the information operations of a hostile regime as helpful is not normal, no matter how much some corners of academia try to dress it up as critical theory or anti-imperial analysis. The discussion keeps escalating from there. The group credits Hamas and Hezbollah with “bringing” political possibility into being, then takes the next step and argues that condemning those terrorist groups is itself immoral. What is especially telling is that Aviña acknowledges the line they are approaching, admitting that “we can get in trouble” and that there could be “legal proceedings” for saying these things. They know exactly how far they are pushing it, and they say it anyway. And through all of this, Aviña is not pushing back. He is not introducing caution, context, or even minimal skepticism. He is nodding along, reinforcing the arguments, and helping carry the conversation forward.

Stu Smith

31,378 views • 3 months ago

🚨 NEWSOM’S INNER CIRCLE IMPLODES: Ex-Chief of Staff GUILTY in $225K Campaign Money-Laundering & Luxury Tax Heist—While Californians Get Fleeced! ☠️ CALIFORNIA’S CORRUPTION RECKONING JUST HIT MACHIAVELLIAN HEIGHTS: Newsom’s Former Chief of Staff Dana Williamson Pleads Guilty to Orchestrating a $225K Campaign Heist & Million-Dollar Tax Scam In the gilded corridors of Sacramento power, where public service supposedly meets the public good, the rule of law has delivered a scholarly gut-punch straight from the Federalist Papers: unchecked ambition breeds corruption, and elites always feast first. Yesterday, May 14, 2026, Dana Williamson—Gavin Newsom’s chief of staff in 2022 and again through 2024, a longtime Sacramento power broker and top advisor to Xavier Becerra—stood in federal court and pled guilty to three felony counts: conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, subscribing to a false tax return, and making false statements to the FBI. This wasn’t some rogue aide’s slip-up. Prosecutors say Williamson was the ringleader in a scheme that quietly siphoned $225,000 from a dormant campaign account tied to Becerra (now a frontrunner for California governor). The money? Funneled for her personal expenses while she simultaneously claimed over $1 million in fraudulent business deductions—Chanel and Fendi luxury goods, home HVAC upgrades, and a jaw-dropping $150,000+ birthday blowout in Mexico. All while serving at the highest levels of state power. Two co-conspirators—Becerra’s former chief of staff Sean McCluskie and lobbyist Greg Campbell—had already cut deals. Williamson now owes roughly $500,000 in restitution to the IRS under her plea. Think about it: While everyday Californians grind under sky-high taxes, housing costs, and crumbling infrastructure, the inner circle treated campaign coffers and tax code like personal ATMs. This is elite capture in its purest form—precisely the kind of “public choice” failure economists and political philosophers have warned about for centuries. Newsom called it “just wrong” and claims zero knowledge. Of course. But when your own chief of staff is indicted on 23 counts before flipping, the “I had no idea” defense rings as hollow as the state’s empty promises and Newscum's multi-billion dollar ghost train. The fish rots from the head. California isn’t “leading” the nation—it’s bleeding trust, treasure, and talent. If this is the standard inside the governor’s office, imagine what’s still hidden. Time for sunlight, forensic audits, and real accountability. The people deserve better than a one-party grift machine masquerading as governance. Who’s next? Drop your thoughts below, I guarantee Gavin Newscum will read this post and comments! 🤣 #NewsomCorruptionExposed #CADemFraudMachine #EliteGriftExposed #DrainTheSacramentoSwamp #CaliforniaReckoning #TaxpayerTheft #BecerraScandal #RuleOfLawMatters

🚨 NEWSOM’S INNER CIRCLE IMPLODES: Ex-Chief of Staff GUILTY in $225K Campaign Money-Laundering & Luxury Tax Heist—While Californians Get Fleeced! ☠️ CALIFORNIA’S CORRUPTION RECKONING JUST HIT MACHIAVELLIAN HEIGHTS: Newsom’s Former Chief of Staff Dana Williamson Pleads Guilty to Orchestrating a $225K Campaign Heist & Million-Dollar Tax Scam In the gilded corridors of Sacramento power, where public service supposedly meets the public good, the rule of law has delivered a scholarly gut-punch straight from the Federalist Papers: unchecked ambition breeds corruption, and elites always feast first. Yesterday, May 14, 2026, Dana Williamson—Gavin Newsom’s chief of staff in 2022 and again through 2024, a longtime Sacramento power broker and top advisor to Xavier Becerra—stood in federal court and pled guilty to three felony counts: conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, subscribing to a false tax return, and making false statements to the FBI. This wasn’t some rogue aide’s slip-up. Prosecutors say Williamson was the ringleader in a scheme that quietly siphoned $225,000 from a dormant campaign account tied to Becerra (now a frontrunner for California governor). The money? Funneled for her personal expenses while she simultaneously claimed over $1 million in fraudulent business deductions—Chanel and Fendi luxury goods, home HVAC upgrades, and a jaw-dropping $150,000+ birthday blowout in Mexico. All while serving at the highest levels of state power. Two co-conspirators—Becerra’s former chief of staff Sean McCluskie and lobbyist Greg Campbell—had already cut deals. Williamson now owes roughly $500,000 in restitution to the IRS under her plea. Think about it: While everyday Californians grind under sky-high taxes, housing costs, and crumbling infrastructure, the inner circle treated campaign coffers and tax code like personal ATMs. This is elite capture in its purest form—precisely the kind of “public choice” failure economists and political philosophers have warned about for centuries. Newsom called it “just wrong” and claims zero knowledge. Of course. But when your own chief of staff is indicted on 23 counts before flipping, the “I had no idea” defense rings as hollow as the state’s empty promises and Newscum's multi-billion dollar ghost train. The fish rots from the head. California isn’t “leading” the nation—it’s bleeding trust, treasure, and talent. If this is the standard inside the governor’s office, imagine what’s still hidden. Time for sunlight, forensic audits, and real accountability. The people deserve better than a one-party grift machine masquerading as governance. Who’s next? Drop your thoughts below, I guarantee Gavin Newscum will read this post and comments! 🤣 #NewsomCorruptionExposed #CADemFraudMachine #EliteGriftExposed #DrainTheSacramentoSwamp #CaliforniaReckoning #TaxpayerTheft #BecerraScandal #RuleOfLawMatters

Tony Seruga

361,185 views • 2 months ago

THE "CONSISTENTLY PROFITABLE" SKILL GAP & THE MYTH OF SUPPLEMENTAL INCOME FROM TRADING For many new traders or part-time traders, there is this pervasive belief that with some time and effort, they'll be able to make "just" a few grand per month to supplement their income. Or they "don't want to aim big, they just want to replace their current salary via trading so they can have more freedom." This is because people mistakenly believe that trading is like most other jobs, rather than it being a winner-take-all performance endeavor more akin to becoming a professional athlete. 99.9% of athletes will never make a dime professionally. There is no market demand for your average high school or college player. To even make league minimum in the NBA, you are still in the .0001% of basketball players. There is no such thing as just deciding to casually make a few grand as a pro athlete. Think about what it takes for someone to make $50k/yr as a golfer? The skill gap to earn an income or make the league minimum is crazy to comprehend. The analogy I gave with AT09 was the story of Brian Scalabrine. Even though Brian Scalabrine “sucked” in the NBA, he would absolutely annihilate 99.9% of the people calling him trash. He once said the famous line that he’s closer in skill to LeBron James than his haters are to him, and that line perfectly explains trading. The gap between unprofitable and elite looks massive from the outside, but the real canyon is between unprofitable and making any amount of money consistently. People look at a trader making $1M a year and think that’s a different species. They assume someone doing $100k a year is basically the same as the guy still blowing accounts, just with better luck. That’s like saying Scalabrine and your friend who plays pickup on Tuesdays are basically equal because neither is LeBron. Going from $0 to consistently profitable is the hardest jump in trading. You CANNOT just casually make a few grand per month or supplement income part-time. The skill level needed to consistently make ANY AMOUNT trading is the equivalent of being in the league. A trader who can pull $100k a year out of the market is not “kind of good.” They have competency in finding edge, executing trades, handling their psychology and risk management, and are competing in the league. From there, scaling to $300k, $500k, even $1M is usually a function of size, capital, and refinement, not a complete identity shift. But the trader still stuck at breakeven or red? They’re not one tweak away from $100k. They’re not “basically there.” They’re still trying to prove they belong on the court at all. The uncomfortable truth is this: the distance between $0 and $100k is far greater than the distance between $100k and $1M. One requires becoming a professional. The other simply just requires becoming a more refined one. My confidence in taking a trader from $100k to $1m is probably 10x higher than my confidence in taking a trader from $0 to $100k.

THE "CONSISTENTLY PROFITABLE" SKILL GAP & THE MYTH OF SUPPLEMENTAL INCOME FROM TRADING For many new traders or part-time traders, there is this pervasive belief that with some time and effort, they'll be able to make "just" a few grand per month to supplement their income. Or they "don't want to aim big, they just want to replace their current salary via trading so they can have more freedom." This is because people mistakenly believe that trading is like most other jobs, rather than it being a winner-take-all performance endeavor more akin to becoming a professional athlete. 99.9% of athletes will never make a dime professionally. There is no market demand for your average high school or college player. To even make league minimum in the NBA, you are still in the .0001% of basketball players. There is no such thing as just deciding to casually make a few grand as a pro athlete. Think about what it takes for someone to make $50k/yr as a golfer? The skill gap to earn an income or make the league minimum is crazy to comprehend. The analogy I gave with AT09 was the story of Brian Scalabrine. Even though Brian Scalabrine “sucked” in the NBA, he would absolutely annihilate 99.9% of the people calling him trash. He once said the famous line that he’s closer in skill to LeBron James than his haters are to him, and that line perfectly explains trading. The gap between unprofitable and elite looks massive from the outside, but the real canyon is between unprofitable and making any amount of money consistently. People look at a trader making $1M a year and think that’s a different species. They assume someone doing $100k a year is basically the same as the guy still blowing accounts, just with better luck. That’s like saying Scalabrine and your friend who plays pickup on Tuesdays are basically equal because neither is LeBron. Going from $0 to consistently profitable is the hardest jump in trading. You CANNOT just casually make a few grand per month or supplement income part-time. The skill level needed to consistently make ANY AMOUNT trading is the equivalent of being in the league. A trader who can pull $100k a year out of the market is not “kind of good.” They have competency in finding edge, executing trades, handling their psychology and risk management, and are competing in the league. From there, scaling to $300k, $500k, even $1M is usually a function of size, capital, and refinement, not a complete identity shift. But the trader still stuck at breakeven or red? They’re not one tweak away from $100k. They’re not “basically there.” They’re still trying to prove they belong on the court at all. The uncomfortable truth is this: the distance between $0 and $100k is far greater than the distance between $100k and $1M. One requires becoming a professional. The other simply just requires becoming a more refined one. My confidence in taking a trader from $100k to $1m is probably 10x higher than my confidence in taking a trader from $0 to $100k.

Lance Breitstein 🇺🇸🌎

168,021 views • 3 months ago

I'm pumped to announce that DFS Mastermind is officially LIVE! I know I teased it some and showed it off but the pre-launch is over and now we build… The journey is just getting started and some of you have already joined in on the project with me. Thank you so much for your support! The early feedback is strong and has been that this concept of premium DFS evergreen content on demand, so to speak, where the community helps create and impact the content/ideas is a game-changer. So, what is DFS Mastermind? It's a passion pursuit project I created for all those that want to take DFS more serious with focus on the new topics and trends, review/application, information and education. All while collaborating with others that have that same curiousty and hunger for more knowledge! This includes content like: • Process/Strategy videos watching over my shoulder and listening as I explain my exact process across different sports and bringing in others that excel at sports I’m not as skilled/experienced with. • Case Studies/Review videos learning how I review and apply certain concepts I pick up from other top players and for other DFS sports. • Exlusive Interviews with DFS players - both professional and casual to learn more about their history, journey and see what we can pick up and learn from their past, lifestyle, mindset etc. • LIVE Events where we hop on a Zoom call together to collaborate and discuss topics around DFS sports, strategy, process, game theory, along with Q&A sessions etc. All this and MORE! There’s also a private Discord for reflection/collaboration before and after events and to discuss new content releases, share thoughts and ask questions that are sparked from watching/listening to them. Everything releases in both audio and video format, so you can take it in your own way, on your own time. If you miss a LIVE Event, it’s recorded and available for playback at your convenience. A completely new, innovative way to see things. Along with the ability to impact the content you see via the community-controlled content aspect! Important to note, this community won’t give you any projections, picks, plays, tools, data etc. (See Ship It Nation 🚀). It will instead give you evergreen knowledge and insight on topics many DFS players struggle with daily. A way to learn at your own pace and be part of collaborations with other DFS players of all skill levels. No matter what DFS sites you’ve been with or are currently at, this community is a great add-on for you. There’s something you can take away and apply across all the things I’ll cover because the community is helping decide it, proving a majority wants it! My mission is to help others get better at DFS and continue to grow the game we all love! Even if it does tilt us heavy at times! If you’ve ever enjoyed any of my work, this is a way to help ME, help YOU! This also helps the entire community. Join US: I truly appreciate if you can reply and/or help share this post. Thank you! Any questions, just shoot me a DM. I read all replies and respond to all DMs! P.S. I'm also offering a couple bonuses right out of the gate: 1.Most know I love a good giveaway, so why not kick things off with one of the biggest I’ve ever done! 👀 Anyone that joins the journey and supports will get entered into a draw on Dec. 23, 2024 for 1 $3,333 Ultimate Main Event Millionaire ticket on DraftKings, taking place Dec. 29, 2024. 2.When I first kicked this project off publicly, I asked thousands of DFS players to send in topics/questions they struggle with. Thanks to the 350+ that sent in questions, as it helped me create: DFS MIND MAP: TOP 10 TOPICS, TIPS, TRICKS & TIDBITS This is a 3hr30min Masterclass that everyone receives when they join the community. I’ll show more on that tomorrow but it’s a HUGE value to get you started and you’ll be part of the early group that receives it! 🧠🧩💡

I'm pumped to announce that DFS Mastermind is officially LIVE! I know I teased it some and showed it off but the pre-launch is over and now we build… The journey is just getting started and some of you have already joined in on the project with me. Thank you so much for your support! The early feedback is strong and has been that this concept of premium DFS evergreen content on demand, so to speak, where the community helps create and impact the content/ideas is a game-changer. So, what is DFS Mastermind? It's a passion pursuit project I created for all those that want to take DFS more serious with focus on the new topics and trends, review/application, information and education. All while collaborating with others that have that same curiousty and hunger for more knowledge! This includes content like: • Process/Strategy videos watching over my shoulder and listening as I explain my exact process across different sports and bringing in others that excel at sports I’m not as skilled/experienced with. • Case Studies/Review videos learning how I review and apply certain concepts I pick up from other top players and for other DFS sports. • Exlusive Interviews with DFS players - both professional and casual to learn more about their history, journey and see what we can pick up and learn from their past, lifestyle, mindset etc. • LIVE Events where we hop on a Zoom call together to collaborate and discuss topics around DFS sports, strategy, process, game theory, along with Q&A sessions etc. All this and MORE! There’s also a private Discord for reflection/collaboration before and after events and to discuss new content releases, share thoughts and ask questions that are sparked from watching/listening to them. Everything releases in both audio and video format, so you can take it in your own way, on your own time. If you miss a LIVE Event, it’s recorded and available for playback at your convenience. A completely new, innovative way to see things. Along with the ability to impact the content you see via the community-controlled content aspect! Important to note, this community won’t give you any projections, picks, plays, tools, data etc. (See Ship It Nation 🚀). It will instead give you evergreen knowledge and insight on topics many DFS players struggle with daily. A way to learn at your own pace and be part of collaborations with other DFS players of all skill levels. No matter what DFS sites you’ve been with or are currently at, this community is a great add-on for you. There’s something you can take away and apply across all the things I’ll cover because the community is helping decide it, proving a majority wants it! My mission is to help others get better at DFS and continue to grow the game we all love! Even if it does tilt us heavy at times! If you’ve ever enjoyed any of my work, this is a way to help ME, help YOU! This also helps the entire community. Join US: I truly appreciate if you can reply and/or help share this post. Thank you! Any questions, just shoot me a DM. I read all replies and respond to all DMs! P.S. I'm also offering a couple bonuses right out of the gate: 1.Most know I love a good giveaway, so why not kick things off with one of the biggest I’ve ever done! 👀 Anyone that joins the journey and supports will get entered into a draw on Dec. 23, 2024 for 1 $3,333 Ultimate Main Event Millionaire ticket on DraftKings, taking place Dec. 29, 2024. 2.When I first kicked this project off publicly, I asked thousands of DFS players to send in topics/questions they struggle with. Thanks to the 350+ that sent in questions, as it helped me create: DFS MIND MAP: TOP 10 TOPICS, TIPS, TRICKS & TIDBITS This is a 3hr30min Masterclass that everyone receives when they join the community. I’ll show more on that tomorrow but it’s a HUGE value to get you started and you’ll be part of the early group that receives it! 🧠🧩💡

Tyler Tamboline

60,031 views • 1 year ago

This is the problem with some of my African brothers, they take Donald Trump’s talking points and lies, turn them into facts, and then run with them. This is also why I encourage my social media followers to read first and then engage in debates that are centred on facts, not emotions, because repeating propaganda does not make it true. American oil companies did not “own Venezuela’s oil wells” in the Chávez era or just before. Venezuela nationalised its oil industry in 1976, more than 20 years before Hugo Chávez came to power. From that point onwards, the oil belonged to the Venezuelan state through Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA). Foreign companies, including Americans, operated under service contracts and joint ventures, not ownership. Hugo Chávez did not hand oil to “mafias” as you have said, brother. He renegotiated contracts in the 2000s to give PDVSA majority control of 60 percent or more in joint ventures. Companies that refused those terms, such as ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips, exited and later pursued international arbitration. Others, including Chevron, stayed and continue to operate in Venezuela to this day, even under US sanctions via special licences. Chevron is an American company. Russians, Chinese, and Iranians did not “take over American oil wells.” Companies from Russia and China entered Venezuela through state-to-state agreements and joint ventures with PDVSA, mostly after Western firms reduced exposure because of sanctions and financial risk. Examples of these partnerships include Rosneft and China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). These firms did not seize American assets, they stepped into gaps created by sanctions, capital flight, and the collapse of PDVSA, operating through state to state agreements and joint ventures rather than expropriation. What happened recently is limited re-entry and licence based cooperation by American companies, especially Chevron, as part of sanctions negotiations tied to political and electoral conditions. So calling Chávez simply “Communist” is MAGA political rally shorthand talk to excite the so called political base, not an economic description of what actually happened. His model was a state-controlled, oil-funded populist system, not classic communism, and Venezuela retained private property and private enterprise throughout his rule. I studied Venezuela and Chávez at film school in Britain, so I know a bit about what happened there, hence my intervention to your comment. Was Maduro a saint? The answer is no, but is this how you pursue oil interests in a rules based world? Have we not learnt enough from history about how this always ends from Patrice Lumumba to Muammar Gaddafi? It is not a binary debate, you can condemn Maduro’s dictatorship and also call for the upholding of international law without lacing arguments with lies and Trump's propaganda. The tragedy on these social media Apps is that people follow personalities, not ideas, not principles, not a set of values. They tragically follow political personalities like they are a religion. So if someone likes Donald Trump, regardless of how badly he has performed, they will still take his talking points and run with them as fact. You cannot have a sensible intellectual debate if you debate that way and choose that route. Be principled and understand that even if you support a specific person or grouping, when the facts do not support what they are saying, you must have the intellectual courage to stand up and say no, this is wrong. I support this person, but what they are saying or doing is wrong. If you go hook, line, and sinker, it means you are intellectually compromised. You have no principles, no values, and you do not follow ideas. I do not think we can learn anything from each other under those conditions and discourse circumstances. I have read many debates on Zimbabwean Twitter and African Twitter that centre on the argument that we also have dictators, so some people end up celebrating Donald Trump’s behaviour on the basis that we too live under authoritarian leaders. That framing is intellectually lazy. Understanding history matters before we make wild and misplaced declarations. Venezuela is not Africa. When surveys were conducted after Hugo Chávez came to power, many Venezuelans described what was happening as liberation. For decades they had lived under oligarchic rule aligned with the United States, dominated by a largely white elite that excluded and marginalised the black and poor majority. That historical context matters, whether one likes Chávez or not. This is why I cringe when I read some of what is posted on social media, arguments made without nuance, without history, and without facts. When we misplace our arguments and compare apples with oranges, we end up making ourselves an intellectual laughing stock. In that context, Chávez was closer to Morgan Tsvangirai than to an African dictator caricature, while the role of the United States in Venezuela mirrors, in some respects, what China is doing in parts of Africa with the help of crooked and corrupt African leaders and their elite compradors. If we are serious about debate, we must engage honestly with history rather than bending it to fit personalities we happen to like. The suffering of poor and Afro-descendant Venezuelans before Hugo Chávez came to power is well documented, and central to why he initially enjoyed mass support. Before 1999 whenChávez came to power, Venezuela was formally a "democracy", but in practice it was run by a small, racially and socially stratified elite concentrated in Caracas and linked to oil rents. Although Venezuela does not use rigid racial categories, poverty and exclusion overwhelmingly fell on darker-skinned and Afro-descendant Venezuelans, while political and economic power sat with lighter-skinned elites of European descent. About 18 to 20 percent of Venezuelans lived in poverty in the late 1970s. By 1998, before Hugo Chávez came to power, poverty had risen sharply to about 49 percent, with roughly 20 to 23 percent of the population living in extreme poverty. During the 1990s, Venezuela also had one of the highest levels of income inequality in Latin America. Oil wealth flowed upward through patronage networks rather than downward into public services, leaving poor, largely black and mixed race communities without adequate healthcare, clean water, or quality education. This extreme inequality existed alongside immense oil wealth, with sprawling slums, the barrios, surrounding wealthy urban centres. The breaking point came in 1989 with the Caracazo, a mass uprising and state massacre in Venezuela in February 1989, and it is one of the most important events for understanding why Hugo Chávez later rose to power. IMF style austerity measures triggered mass protests that were brutally crushed by the army, resulting in the deaths of thousands of poor Venezuelans. That massacre permanently delegitimised the old elite order in the eyes of the majority, the very elite that controlled oil revenues. Chávez was therefore seen by many inside Venezuela as a liberator. He was not just another politician. He was the first president who openly spoke like, looked like, and identified with the poor majority, including Afro Venezuelans. His political legitimacy came from redirecting oil income away from oligarchic capture and towards social spending aimed at the excluded majority. Between 1999 and 2012, measurable social indicators improved significantly, using UNDP, World Bank, and Venezuelan official data from the 2000s. Overall poverty fell from around 49 percent in 1998 to about 27 percent by 2011, while extreme poverty dropped from roughly 23 percent to under 8 percent. This represented one of the fastest poverty reductions in the hemisphere during the oil boom years. Income inequality also declined. Venezuela’s Gini coefficient fell from about 0.49 to around 0.39, and by the late 2000s the country was ranked among the least unequal in Latin America. The Gini coefficient is a statistical measure of income or wealth inequality within a country or society. There was a major expansion in health, education and social services. Free healthcare clinics were rolled out across poor barrios, illiteracy was declared eradicated under UNESCO standards, and school enrolment and university access increased sharply for poor and black Venezuelans. Political inclusion also changed. Afro Venezuelans became visible in politics, media, and state institutions for the first time, and the constitution explicitly recognised Afro descendant and indigenous rights. This is why international observers at the time acknowledged that Chávez achieved real social inclusion, even among critics of his broader politics. Chávez did not rise to protect a political elite. He rose against one. That is why poor Venezuelans initially defended him, just as many Africans supported liberation movements at independence, or opposition movements even when later outcomes disappointed. Ignoring that history flattens reality and turns serious political analysis into personality worship or cheap propaganda. Chávez genuinely improved the material lives of poor and black Venezuelans in his first decade, but he failed to build sustainable institutions, diversify oil production, or protect PDVSA from politicisation. When oil prices collapsed and sanctions later compounded mismanagement, many of those gains were reversed under Nicolás Maduro. However, this does not erase the historical reality of why Chávez rose to power, nor does it justify lazily comparing him to African dictators without context, which is intellectually dishonest. That is why Chávez was defended by the masses during the brief 2002 coup. When he was removed from office and a self appointed interim government was announced, poor and working class Venezuelans poured into the streets, surrounded the presidential palace, and refused to accept the return of the old elite order. Within about 48 hours, with the backing of popular mobilisation and loyal sections of the military, Hugo Chávez was brought back to power. That moment confirmed, more than any speech or election result, why large sections of Venezuelan society saw him as their own and were prepared to defend him. So facts matter my brother.

This is the problem with some of my African brothers, they take Donald Trump’s talking points and lies, turn them into facts, and then run with them. This is also why I encourage my social media followers to read first and then engage in debates that are centred on facts, not emotions, because repeating propaganda does not make it true. American oil companies did not “own Venezuela’s oil wells” in the Chávez era or just before. Venezuela nationalised its oil industry in 1976, more than 20 years before Hugo Chávez came to power. From that point onwards, the oil belonged to the Venezuelan state through Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA). Foreign companies, including Americans, operated under service contracts and joint ventures, not ownership. Hugo Chávez did not hand oil to “mafias” as you have said, brother. He renegotiated contracts in the 2000s to give PDVSA majority control of 60 percent or more in joint ventures. Companies that refused those terms, such as ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips, exited and later pursued international arbitration. Others, including Chevron, stayed and continue to operate in Venezuela to this day, even under US sanctions via special licences. Chevron is an American company. Russians, Chinese, and Iranians did not “take over American oil wells.” Companies from Russia and China entered Venezuela through state-to-state agreements and joint ventures with PDVSA, mostly after Western firms reduced exposure because of sanctions and financial risk. Examples of these partnerships include Rosneft and China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). These firms did not seize American assets, they stepped into gaps created by sanctions, capital flight, and the collapse of PDVSA, operating through state to state agreements and joint ventures rather than expropriation. What happened recently is limited re-entry and licence based cooperation by American companies, especially Chevron, as part of sanctions negotiations tied to political and electoral conditions. So calling Chávez simply “Communist” is MAGA political rally shorthand talk to excite the so called political base, not an economic description of what actually happened. His model was a state-controlled, oil-funded populist system, not classic communism, and Venezuela retained private property and private enterprise throughout his rule. I studied Venezuela and Chávez at film school in Britain, so I know a bit about what happened there, hence my intervention to your comment. Was Maduro a saint? The answer is no, but is this how you pursue oil interests in a rules based world? Have we not learnt enough from history about how this always ends from Patrice Lumumba to Muammar Gaddafi? It is not a binary debate, you can condemn Maduro’s dictatorship and also call for the upholding of international law without lacing arguments with lies and Trump's propaganda. The tragedy on these social media Apps is that people follow personalities, not ideas, not principles, not a set of values. They tragically follow political personalities like they are a religion. So if someone likes Donald Trump, regardless of how badly he has performed, they will still take his talking points and run with them as fact. You cannot have a sensible intellectual debate if you debate that way and choose that route. Be principled and understand that even if you support a specific person or grouping, when the facts do not support what they are saying, you must have the intellectual courage to stand up and say no, this is wrong. I support this person, but what they are saying or doing is wrong. If you go hook, line, and sinker, it means you are intellectually compromised. You have no principles, no values, and you do not follow ideas. I do not think we can learn anything from each other under those conditions and discourse circumstances. I have read many debates on Zimbabwean Twitter and African Twitter that centre on the argument that we also have dictators, so some people end up celebrating Donald Trump’s behaviour on the basis that we too live under authoritarian leaders. That framing is intellectually lazy. Understanding history matters before we make wild and misplaced declarations. Venezuela is not Africa. When surveys were conducted after Hugo Chávez came to power, many Venezuelans described what was happening as liberation. For decades they had lived under oligarchic rule aligned with the United States, dominated by a largely white elite that excluded and marginalised the black and poor majority. That historical context matters, whether one likes Chávez or not. This is why I cringe when I read some of what is posted on social media, arguments made without nuance, without history, and without facts. When we misplace our arguments and compare apples with oranges, we end up making ourselves an intellectual laughing stock. In that context, Chávez was closer to Morgan Tsvangirai than to an African dictator caricature, while the role of the United States in Venezuela mirrors, in some respects, what China is doing in parts of Africa with the help of crooked and corrupt African leaders and their elite compradors. If we are serious about debate, we must engage honestly with history rather than bending it to fit personalities we happen to like. The suffering of poor and Afro-descendant Venezuelans before Hugo Chávez came to power is well documented, and central to why he initially enjoyed mass support. Before 1999 whenChávez came to power, Venezuela was formally a "democracy", but in practice it was run by a small, racially and socially stratified elite concentrated in Caracas and linked to oil rents. Although Venezuela does not use rigid racial categories, poverty and exclusion overwhelmingly fell on darker-skinned and Afro-descendant Venezuelans, while political and economic power sat with lighter-skinned elites of European descent. About 18 to 20 percent of Venezuelans lived in poverty in the late 1970s. By 1998, before Hugo Chávez came to power, poverty had risen sharply to about 49 percent, with roughly 20 to 23 percent of the population living in extreme poverty. During the 1990s, Venezuela also had one of the highest levels of income inequality in Latin America. Oil wealth flowed upward through patronage networks rather than downward into public services, leaving poor, largely black and mixed race communities without adequate healthcare, clean water, or quality education. This extreme inequality existed alongside immense oil wealth, with sprawling slums, the barrios, surrounding wealthy urban centres. The breaking point came in 1989 with the Caracazo, a mass uprising and state massacre in Venezuela in February 1989, and it is one of the most important events for understanding why Hugo Chávez later rose to power. IMF style austerity measures triggered mass protests that were brutally crushed by the army, resulting in the deaths of thousands of poor Venezuelans. That massacre permanently delegitimised the old elite order in the eyes of the majority, the very elite that controlled oil revenues. Chávez was therefore seen by many inside Venezuela as a liberator. He was not just another politician. He was the first president who openly spoke like, looked like, and identified with the poor majority, including Afro Venezuelans. His political legitimacy came from redirecting oil income away from oligarchic capture and towards social spending aimed at the excluded majority. Between 1999 and 2012, measurable social indicators improved significantly, using UNDP, World Bank, and Venezuelan official data from the 2000s. Overall poverty fell from around 49 percent in 1998 to about 27 percent by 2011, while extreme poverty dropped from roughly 23 percent to under 8 percent. This represented one of the fastest poverty reductions in the hemisphere during the oil boom years. Income inequality also declined. Venezuela’s Gini coefficient fell from about 0.49 to around 0.39, and by the late 2000s the country was ranked among the least unequal in Latin America. The Gini coefficient is a statistical measure of income or wealth inequality within a country or society. There was a major expansion in health, education and social services. Free healthcare clinics were rolled out across poor barrios, illiteracy was declared eradicated under UNESCO standards, and school enrolment and university access increased sharply for poor and black Venezuelans. Political inclusion also changed. Afro Venezuelans became visible in politics, media, and state institutions for the first time, and the constitution explicitly recognised Afro descendant and indigenous rights. This is why international observers at the time acknowledged that Chávez achieved real social inclusion, even among critics of his broader politics. Chávez did not rise to protect a political elite. He rose against one. That is why poor Venezuelans initially defended him, just as many Africans supported liberation movements at independence, or opposition movements even when later outcomes disappointed. Ignoring that history flattens reality and turns serious political analysis into personality worship or cheap propaganda. Chávez genuinely improved the material lives of poor and black Venezuelans in his first decade, but he failed to build sustainable institutions, diversify oil production, or protect PDVSA from politicisation. When oil prices collapsed and sanctions later compounded mismanagement, many of those gains were reversed under Nicolás Maduro. However, this does not erase the historical reality of why Chávez rose to power, nor does it justify lazily comparing him to African dictators without context, which is intellectually dishonest. That is why Chávez was defended by the masses during the brief 2002 coup. When he was removed from office and a self appointed interim government was announced, poor and working class Venezuelans poured into the streets, surrounded the presidential palace, and refused to accept the return of the old elite order. Within about 48 hours, with the backing of popular mobilisation and loyal sections of the military, Hugo Chávez was brought back to power. That moment confirmed, more than any speech or election result, why large sections of Venezuelan society saw him as their own and were prepared to defend him. So facts matter my brother.

Hopewell Chin’ono

38,260 views • 6 months ago

I IGNORED IGAMING FOR TWO YEARS. THEN I DID THE MATH Here is what changed my mind Imagine a debate: Everyone is arguing about the next big narrative - AI agents? - Meme coins? - Another DeFi twist? But suddenly someone mentions iGaming - and the conversation does not die. It grows The same thing started happening on Crypto Twitter recently I used to be the one who always changed the topic until recently Let me explain WHAT I HAD TO ADMIT iGaming is not a new hype It is a multi billion machine that has been generating real cash for years 13 percent annual growth Crypto volumes in the sector are doubling year over year The money is already flowing The only thing that changes is who captures it on-chain Looking at it now I do not understand how I ignored it before BUT FIRST WHY I DID NOT TRUST THIS SECTOR All iGaming tokens sounded the same: - Huge market - Loud promises - Token detached from real usage I thought it was just noise but that assumption was my mistake What changed my position was not hype or anyone’s recommendation It was structure concrete verifiable numbers THIS IS AN INDUSTRY THAT NEVER NEEDED CRYPTO Here is the right question I should have asked from the start Can a token connect to activity that already exists instead of trying to create it This is a completely different starting point iGaming answers this question YES Millions of people go on platforms every day not to farm points and not to speculate but to play bet and interact This activity generates what crypto rarely has at scale - stable revenue independent of sentiment A PLATFORM THAT EXISTED BEFORE THE TOKEN? Most crypto projects follow this scheme: 1. Launch a token 2. Distribute incentives 3. Try to find users But I found a project that positions itself differently - 1win Token 1win did the opposite First nearly a decade of operations: - 30M+ users in 50+ countries - Systems for engagement and monetization - Around 1B USD annual revenue - Global celebrity advertising - Nine years of operations before the first token The platform existed long before the token did And that order matters more than it seems WHERE TOKENOMICS FINALLY BECAME INTERESTING Most buyback mechanisms are just marketing in a whitepaper Here it is different The mechanism is deterministic and built into code: - A portion of real platform revenue goes to weekly buybacks from the market - Bought tokens are returned to users as cashback - 10 percent of every spent 1WIN is burned daily - Fixed supply 10B No inflation No additional issuance The loop looks like this: ACTIVITY -> REVENUE -> BUYBACK -> REWARDS -> BURN -> LOWER SUPPLY Activity affects the token Not sentiment This is a flywheel tied to real human behavior not the price of BTC THE ARCHITECTURE MOST PEOPLE MISS $1WIN is natively deployed on BNB Chain and Solana via LayerZero When tokens move between chains they are burned on source and minted on destination Total supply remains constant This removes typical bridge risks that have already killed many projects And it gives access to: - BNB liquidity and retail base - Solana speed and DeFi activity This level of design is not accidental THE SIGNAL THAT MADE ME LOOK TWICE Then I saw the collaboration with Jupiter Not a vague partnership announcement but a live reward campaign inside the Jupiter ecosystem Jupiter is the core infrastructure hub of Solana DeFi with billions in daily volume Serious infrastructure platforms do not align with projects without substance This added another layer of confidence before the tokensale ATTENTION IS ALREADY BOUGHT INTO CRYPTO There is another layer most people ignore Before any token before any on-chain narrative 1win already built global distribution through sports and entertainment - Jon Jones: UFC legend and youngest champion in history - Canelo Alvarez: Mexican boxing superstar - David Warner: elite international cricket star You do not get athletes of this level unless the business under the hood generates serious stable cashflow This is the key signal The token is not trying to create attention from zero It is plugging into attention that already exists WHY TIMING MATTERS RIGHT NOW Recently I started noticing a shift Conversations about iGaming tokens are becoming more frequent and more serious Less noise more people with real arguments This is how early narratives usually form And right when this shift is happening $1WIN is approaching its tokensale No price history No price discovery Only users revenue and mechanics already in place This timing is rare BUT REMEMBER THE RISKS Regulation execution liquidity after launch These risks are real and I am not going to pretend they are not But the key difference compared to most pre TGE projects is: - Product already exists - Users already exist - Revenue is already generated Most crypto projects do not start this way WHY MY VIEW CHANGED Not because of shill Not because of anyone’s recommendation Because the puzzle finally made sense 1. Large existing industry with real cashflow 2. Platform with real users and revenue before token 3. Token mechanically tied to activity not sentiment 4. Architecture solving real problems 5. Tier 1 partnerships as a catalyst 6. Timing where attention is just starting to form This combination is rare The best opportunities rarely look obvious at first They sit in categories people underestimate while the structure quietly builds underneath iGaming is already a cashflow machine What changes is how that value is represented on-chain This is not a token looking for users This is a working system inviting the token inside And right now it still feels early Usually that is where the edge is Good luck!

I IGNORED IGAMING FOR TWO YEARS. THEN I DID THE MATH Here is what changed my mind Imagine a debate: Everyone is arguing about the next big narrative - AI agents? - Meme coins? - Another DeFi twist? But suddenly someone mentions iGaming - and the conversation does not die. It grows The same thing started happening on Crypto Twitter recently I used to be the one who always changed the topic until recently Let me explain WHAT I HAD TO ADMIT iGaming is not a new hype It is a multi billion machine that has been generating real cash for years 13 percent annual growth Crypto volumes in the sector are doubling year over year The money is already flowing The only thing that changes is who captures it on-chain Looking at it now I do not understand how I ignored it before BUT FIRST WHY I DID NOT TRUST THIS SECTOR All iGaming tokens sounded the same: - Huge market - Loud promises - Token detached from real usage I thought it was just noise but that assumption was my mistake What changed my position was not hype or anyone’s recommendation It was structure concrete verifiable numbers THIS IS AN INDUSTRY THAT NEVER NEEDED CRYPTO Here is the right question I should have asked from the start Can a token connect to activity that already exists instead of trying to create it This is a completely different starting point iGaming answers this question YES Millions of people go on platforms every day not to farm points and not to speculate but to play bet and interact This activity generates what crypto rarely has at scale - stable revenue independent of sentiment A PLATFORM THAT EXISTED BEFORE THE TOKEN? Most crypto projects follow this scheme: 1. Launch a token 2. Distribute incentives 3. Try to find users But I found a project that positions itself differently - 1win Token 1win did the opposite First nearly a decade of operations: - 30M+ users in 50+ countries - Systems for engagement and monetization - Around 1B USD annual revenue - Global celebrity advertising - Nine years of operations before the first token The platform existed long before the token did And that order matters more than it seems WHERE TOKENOMICS FINALLY BECAME INTERESTING Most buyback mechanisms are just marketing in a whitepaper Here it is different The mechanism is deterministic and built into code: - A portion of real platform revenue goes to weekly buybacks from the market - Bought tokens are returned to users as cashback - 10 percent of every spent 1WIN is burned daily - Fixed supply 10B No inflation No additional issuance The loop looks like this: ACTIVITY -> REVENUE -> BUYBACK -> REWARDS -> BURN -> LOWER SUPPLY Activity affects the token Not sentiment This is a flywheel tied to real human behavior not the price of BTC THE ARCHITECTURE MOST PEOPLE MISS $1WIN is natively deployed on BNB Chain and Solana via LayerZero When tokens move between chains they are burned on source and minted on destination Total supply remains constant This removes typical bridge risks that have already killed many projects And it gives access to: - BNB liquidity and retail base - Solana speed and DeFi activity This level of design is not accidental THE SIGNAL THAT MADE ME LOOK TWICE Then I saw the collaboration with Jupiter Not a vague partnership announcement but a live reward campaign inside the Jupiter ecosystem Jupiter is the core infrastructure hub of Solana DeFi with billions in daily volume Serious infrastructure platforms do not align with projects without substance This added another layer of confidence before the tokensale ATTENTION IS ALREADY BOUGHT INTO CRYPTO There is another layer most people ignore Before any token before any on-chain narrative 1win already built global distribution through sports and entertainment - Jon Jones: UFC legend and youngest champion in history - Canelo Alvarez: Mexican boxing superstar - David Warner: elite international cricket star You do not get athletes of this level unless the business under the hood generates serious stable cashflow This is the key signal The token is not trying to create attention from zero It is plugging into attention that already exists WHY TIMING MATTERS RIGHT NOW Recently I started noticing a shift Conversations about iGaming tokens are becoming more frequent and more serious Less noise more people with real arguments This is how early narratives usually form And right when this shift is happening $1WIN is approaching its tokensale No price history No price discovery Only users revenue and mechanics already in place This timing is rare BUT REMEMBER THE RISKS Regulation execution liquidity after launch These risks are real and I am not going to pretend they are not But the key difference compared to most pre TGE projects is: - Product already exists - Users already exist - Revenue is already generated Most crypto projects do not start this way WHY MY VIEW CHANGED Not because of shill Not because of anyone’s recommendation Because the puzzle finally made sense 1. Large existing industry with real cashflow 2. Platform with real users and revenue before token 3. Token mechanically tied to activity not sentiment 4. Architecture solving real problems 5. Tier 1 partnerships as a catalyst 6. Timing where attention is just starting to form This combination is rare The best opportunities rarely look obvious at first They sit in categories people underestimate while the structure quietly builds underneath iGaming is already a cashflow machine What changes is how that value is represented on-chain This is not a token looking for users This is a working system inviting the token inside And right now it still feels early Usually that is where the edge is Good luck!

Linton Worm (🍏,🪱)

14,345 views • 3 months ago

🎙️ Akademiks Responds to Clout Chasing Senior Citizen Streamer Glasses Malone Comparing Him to O.J. Simpson DJ Akademiks reacts to a clip of Glasses Malone attempting to compare him to O.J. Simpson, calling it a reach for attention and completely off base. 🤨 Ak’s Issue With the Comparison •Ak says the comparison makes no sense and ignores context •He accuses Glasses Malone of clout chasing by leaning into controversy •Ak believes Glasses is too intelligent to seriously make that analogy, but did it anyway for attention ⚖️ Ak on the Doechii vs Adin Ross Situation Ak makes it clear why he didn’t rush to Doechii’s defense: •Doechii has publicly said her “red flag” is straight men •Ak says as a straight man, he’s disqualified himself from “white-knighting” for someone who openly dismisses people like him •He believes in equality: 👉 Adults can defend themselves in verbal disputes 👉 Women don’t need to be babied or protected in non-physical arguments 🗣️ About the Verbal Back and Forth •Ak points out Doechii made disrespectful claims in her music aimed at Adin Ross saying he “Sucks All These Male Rappers **** from the back.” •When Adin responded verbally, people suddenly framed it as a major issue •Ak’s stance: 👉 This is two adults trading insults, not a civil rights moment 👉 Verbal disrespect invites verbal responses gender doesn’t change that 🚨 Clear Line Drawn Ak stresses: •Verbal arguments does not equal physical harm •If it were physical, he says he’d step in immediately •But online or verbal exchanges don’t require saving grown adults from words 🧠 Ak’s Bigger Point •The internet selectively decides who deserves protection •People rush to defend for optics, not principles •Turning every insult into a moral crisis dilutes real issues 💭 My Take on Doechii (Why It Changed) I used to be a real supporter of Doechii. I thought she was talented and believed that once she fully found her own sound and voice outside of mimicking other artists she could be great. But over time, my perception changed. 🎤 Live Experience I attended a few of her live events, and what stood out to me was: •The way she spoke to people working for her •It came off disrespectful, and that was disappointing to see firsthand 🎧 “Student of Rap” Claims Doechii has said she’s: •A student of rap •A fan of battle rap However, during an interview: •She was asked about a legendary, elite battle rapper •Someone she’s essentially in the same creative orbit as (same small label, same studio space) •She didn’t know who he was That felt disingenuous to me like she was saying what she thought people wanted to hear rather than speaking from real knowledge or passion. 🗣️ Comments About Men The final shift for me was her own words: •She openly said she hates men, especially straight men At that point, I had to ask myself: 👉 Why would I support someone who openly says they hate what I am? It’s ironic how some of the loudest self proclaimed “protectors” of Black women: •Rarely confront men they are around who actually disrespect Black women Glasses is an alleged gang member. Majority of gang banging music disrespects the black woman. A lot of gang members Pimp and beat black women. Yet Glasses Luther King Malone Jr doesn’t take the time to address that. Which is one of the biggest problems in our culture and community. •On Top Of That Malcolm Glasses X Has past work that degrades or exploits Black women.. Glasses an alleged professional writer/ Thinker/ Rapper Literally has a song called Rihanna where he uses the brutal beating Rihanna suffered in a domestic dispute as an analogy/ metaphor for him to brag about what he will do to the vagina. •It’s Really Interesting to see people who have done a lot of evil to the black culture adopt a moral high ground when it’s convenient 📌 Bottom Line: Akademiks sees this as manufactured outrage, clout chasing, and selective accountability.

🎙️ Akademiks Responds to Clout Chasing Senior Citizen Streamer Glasses Malone Comparing Him to O.J. Simpson DJ Akademiks reacts to a clip of Glasses Malone attempting to compare him to O.J. Simpson, calling it a reach for attention and completely off base. 🤨 Ak’s Issue With the Comparison •Ak says the comparison makes no sense and ignores context •He accuses Glasses Malone of clout chasing by leaning into controversy •Ak believes Glasses is too intelligent to seriously make that analogy, but did it anyway for attention ⚖️ Ak on the Doechii vs Adin Ross Situation Ak makes it clear why he didn’t rush to Doechii’s defense: •Doechii has publicly said her “red flag” is straight men •Ak says as a straight man, he’s disqualified himself from “white-knighting” for someone who openly dismisses people like him •He believes in equality: 👉 Adults can defend themselves in verbal disputes 👉 Women don’t need to be babied or protected in non-physical arguments 🗣️ About the Verbal Back and Forth •Ak points out Doechii made disrespectful claims in her music aimed at Adin Ross saying he “Sucks All These Male Rappers **** from the back.” •When Adin responded verbally, people suddenly framed it as a major issue •Ak’s stance: 👉 This is two adults trading insults, not a civil rights moment 👉 Verbal disrespect invites verbal responses gender doesn’t change that 🚨 Clear Line Drawn Ak stresses: •Verbal arguments does not equal physical harm •If it were physical, he says he’d step in immediately •But online or verbal exchanges don’t require saving grown adults from words 🧠 Ak’s Bigger Point •The internet selectively decides who deserves protection •People rush to defend for optics, not principles •Turning every insult into a moral crisis dilutes real issues 💭 My Take on Doechii (Why It Changed) I used to be a real supporter of Doechii. I thought she was talented and believed that once she fully found her own sound and voice outside of mimicking other artists she could be great. But over time, my perception changed. 🎤 Live Experience I attended a few of her live events, and what stood out to me was: •The way she spoke to people working for her •It came off disrespectful, and that was disappointing to see firsthand 🎧 “Student of Rap” Claims Doechii has said she’s: •A student of rap •A fan of battle rap However, during an interview: •She was asked about a legendary, elite battle rapper •Someone she’s essentially in the same creative orbit as (same small label, same studio space) •She didn’t know who he was That felt disingenuous to me like she was saying what she thought people wanted to hear rather than speaking from real knowledge or passion. 🗣️ Comments About Men The final shift for me was her own words: •She openly said she hates men, especially straight men At that point, I had to ask myself: 👉 Why would I support someone who openly says they hate what I am? It’s ironic how some of the loudest self proclaimed “protectors” of Black women: •Rarely confront men they are around who actually disrespect Black women Glasses is an alleged gang member. Majority of gang banging music disrespects the black woman. A lot of gang members Pimp and beat black women. Yet Glasses Luther King Malone Jr doesn’t take the time to address that. Which is one of the biggest problems in our culture and community. •On Top Of That Malcolm Glasses X Has past work that degrades or exploits Black women.. Glasses an alleged professional writer/ Thinker/ Rapper Literally has a song called Rihanna where he uses the brutal beating Rihanna suffered in a domestic dispute as an analogy/ metaphor for him to brag about what he will do to the vagina. •It’s Really Interesting to see people who have done a lot of evil to the black culture adopt a moral high ground when it’s convenient 📌 Bottom Line: Akademiks sees this as manufactured outrage, clout chasing, and selective accountability.

Cousin Tino ™️

17,281 views • 6 months ago

Dana Gioia is one of the world’s greatest living poets. He’s been writing for ~55 years, and this 3-hour interview is all about his approach to writing. Some lessons: 1. What is poetry? Here’s a definition: “Poetry is a way of remembering what it would impoverish us to forget.” 2. And who is the mother of the muses? Mnemosyne, the goddess of memory. 3. You can’t understand poetry until you start learning it by heart. Yes, memorizing it. The metaphor of knowing something by heart means storing a piece of wisdom in the center of your being and making it a part of you. 4. Poetry exists in the body before it exists in language. For him, great writing is about putting form to felt sensations. 5. First drafts are an act of madness. They’re messy and chaotic, and it’s worth embracing that. Only in the process of revision does the structure begin to reveal itself. 6. The most valuable ideas arrive suddenly, fully formed but fragile, and they won’t wait for you to be ready. If you don’t write them down immediately, you’ll probably forget them. 7. His artistic process: Confusion, followed by madness, exhilaration, and despair. 8. Aspiring writers who can’t find the time to write run the risk of living a life of regret, where destiny takes the wheel and steers them off-course. Seneca says, “If you follow your destiny, it guides you. If you resist it, it drags you behind it.” 9. What’s the purpose of art? Most people, most of the time, go through life half-awake. The purpose of art is to awaken us to reality and help us feel our situation. Done right, it excites, expands, and refines our complete human intelligence. 10. Can you write with a full-time job? T.S. Eliot had a day job at a bank. Wallace Stevens was an insurance lawyer. Dana Gioia worked a full-time job in New York and wrote in the evenings. 11. Life is like a wallet full of one-hour bills. You only have 24 hours to spend every day. If you want to do serious writing while raising a family and maintaining a full-time job, almost every hour of every day has to be budgeted. 12. Poetry should turn. It shouldn’t just climb to an emotional height. It should pivot, contradict, or contain its own rebuttal. But most new poems go something like this: “I’m sad, I’m sad, I’m sad, I’m sad, the end,” or “I’m happy, I’m happy, I’m happy, the end. There’s no twist, no turn. 13. You don’t need to be 100% original. All you need to do is assemble parts of the reality that already exists. As George Balanchine said, “God creates, I assemble.” 14. A foundational book in his life: The City of God by St. Augustine. He says there are two cities that exist: There’s the City of Man, which is ruled by wealth and power and all the laws of man. And there’s the City of God which is eternal and governed by the rules of God. 15. Great poetry exists at the level of intuition, and it’s the same intuition that academic education tries to suppress. With great poems, like great songs, you feel before you understand. 16. Art is an argument with yourself. Yeats said: “Out of arguments with others, we make politics. Out of arguments with ourselves, we make poetry.” 17. Great writing should astonish the creator, and if it doesn’t astonish the creator, it won’t astonish the reader. 18. Robert Frost once said: “No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. No surprise in the writer, no surprise in the reader.” 19. Beauty is being able to see the form, the shape underneath reality, and to understand why it is right, even when it is destructive or terrifying or humiliating. The most powerful kind of beauty is to discover the secret shape and rightness of things that are terrifying. 20. On novels: Most people don’t understand what a novel is — and how revolutionary the form was. So, what’s a novel? It’s a story that tells you simultaneously what’s happening on the outside of a character and what they’re thinking on the inside. I’ve shared the full interview with Dana Gioia below. If you’d rather watch it on YouTube, or listen on Apple or Spotify, check out the reply tweets.

Dana Gioia is one of the world’s greatest living poets. He’s been writing for ~55 years, and this 3-hour interview is all about his approach to writing. Some lessons: 1. What is poetry? Here’s a definition: “Poetry is a way of remembering what it would impoverish us to forget.” 2. And who is the mother of the muses? Mnemosyne, the goddess of memory. 3. You can’t understand poetry until you start learning it by heart. Yes, memorizing it. The metaphor of knowing something by heart means storing a piece of wisdom in the center of your being and making it a part of you. 4. Poetry exists in the body before it exists in language. For him, great writing is about putting form to felt sensations. 5. First drafts are an act of madness. They’re messy and chaotic, and it’s worth embracing that. Only in the process of revision does the structure begin to reveal itself. 6. The most valuable ideas arrive suddenly, fully formed but fragile, and they won’t wait for you to be ready. If you don’t write them down immediately, you’ll probably forget them. 7. His artistic process: Confusion, followed by madness, exhilaration, and despair. 8. Aspiring writers who can’t find the time to write run the risk of living a life of regret, where destiny takes the wheel and steers them off-course. Seneca says, “If you follow your destiny, it guides you. If you resist it, it drags you behind it.” 9. What’s the purpose of art? Most people, most of the time, go through life half-awake. The purpose of art is to awaken us to reality and help us feel our situation. Done right, it excites, expands, and refines our complete human intelligence. 10. Can you write with a full-time job? T.S. Eliot had a day job at a bank. Wallace Stevens was an insurance lawyer. Dana Gioia worked a full-time job in New York and wrote in the evenings. 11. Life is like a wallet full of one-hour bills. You only have 24 hours to spend every day. If you want to do serious writing while raising a family and maintaining a full-time job, almost every hour of every day has to be budgeted. 12. Poetry should turn. It shouldn’t just climb to an emotional height. It should pivot, contradict, or contain its own rebuttal. But most new poems go something like this: “I’m sad, I’m sad, I’m sad, I’m sad, the end,” or “I’m happy, I’m happy, I’m happy, the end. There’s no twist, no turn. 13. You don’t need to be 100% original. All you need to do is assemble parts of the reality that already exists. As George Balanchine said, “God creates, I assemble.” 14. A foundational book in his life: The City of God by St. Augustine. He says there are two cities that exist: There’s the City of Man, which is ruled by wealth and power and all the laws of man. And there’s the City of God which is eternal and governed by the rules of God. 15. Great poetry exists at the level of intuition, and it’s the same intuition that academic education tries to suppress. With great poems, like great songs, you feel before you understand. 16. Art is an argument with yourself. Yeats said: “Out of arguments with others, we make politics. Out of arguments with ourselves, we make poetry.” 17. Great writing should astonish the creator, and if it doesn’t astonish the creator, it won’t astonish the reader. 18. Robert Frost once said: “No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. No surprise in the writer, no surprise in the reader.” 19. Beauty is being able to see the form, the shape underneath reality, and to understand why it is right, even when it is destructive or terrifying or humiliating. The most powerful kind of beauty is to discover the secret shape and rightness of things that are terrifying. 20. On novels: Most people don’t understand what a novel is — and how revolutionary the form was. So, what’s a novel? It’s a story that tells you simultaneously what’s happening on the outside of a character and what they’re thinking on the inside. I’ve shared the full interview with Dana Gioia below. If you’d rather watch it on YouTube, or listen on Apple or Spotify, check out the reply tweets.

David Perell

870,721 views • 1 year ago

While we are busy focused on the 2030 presidential term extension theatrics, the presidential race to take over from President Emmerson Mnangagwa is already in full swing inside ZANUPF. It is an open secret that Mnangagwa’s preferred successor is businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei, and the dark horse is General Valerio Sibanda, who retired from the army in an announcement made yesterday by the presidency. Tagwirei is already on a campaign trail which some have not observed, and all the issues he is raising are carefully crafted to resonate with ordinary citizens, shifting from liberation struggle slogans like Pasi neMhandu to Pasi neNhamo and Mari Muhomwe. He is deliberately rebranding himself as a champion of economic grievances, positioning his message to speak directly to poverty, hardship, and the cost of living, rather than the old liberation rhetoric. This is not accidental, his nemesis is a soldier and military general whose track record is rooted in Zimbabwe's excesses. What Tagwirei is doing is planting in his rallies a political seed that he hopes will germinate between now and 2027, when the ZANUPF Congress is expected to elect a new leader, or even earlier if an extraordinary congress is convened as some in the ruling party suspect might happen. That seed is intended to carry him into 2028, when the general election is due, if he succeeds in taking over should his principal, President Mnangagwa, not change his mind or Chiwenga stages a dramatic miracle coup. He is laying the groundwork early, shaping public perception, opinion and positioning himself as the natural successor by tapping into economic frustrations that ordinary citizens understand and feel every day. The elites see things differently, but it is the poor in townships and rural Zimbabwe who are being targeted with this messaging. When I look at the political landscape in Zimbabwe today, I see nobody else, either in the opposition or in ZANUPF, offering a clear and solid message that speaks to the people’s real needs. What we consider logical in elite circles does not sell to the poor, their needs are immediate. They want solutions for today, regardless of who created the problems that require solutions. While the educated elites talk about root-cause analysis and solutions for a distant future in their scenarios, the ordinary citizens want Sapatina, a euphemism for something that comes today, coined by a man who was perfectly happy eating chicken and chips/fries at State House. Our struggles are different. Vice President General Constantino Chiwenga, who thought he was a shoo in to become the next president after leading a coup against Robert Mugabe and making way for Mnangagwa, is now talking about corruption, something we have discussed for years to appeal to the masses. But Tagwirei is positioning himself differently. He is in full campaign mode, planting messages aimed at securing his place in the succession race, messages of economic prosperity. He is speaking to the daily needs of ZANUPF supporters and Zimbabweans in general. He is placing himself before the electorate, travelling, being visible, leveraging state linked platforms, and promising youths economic empowerment. Meanwhile, the general is speaking in closed boardrooms, and nobody has heard him speak directly to his presidential ambitions outside his own circle. Tagwirei is out in the open shaping a constituency, while Chiwenga remains confined to private spaces that do not build political momentum. That does not look regular to me unless he has an ace up his sleeves, a coup, because a coup does not require much talking. But as Mnangagwa shuts all the options once available to him by creating a state security sector in his own image, the prospects of a coup become slimmer with each move made by Mnangagwa. In closing those doors and pathways, Mnangagwa has effectively weakened Chiwenga’s leverage and narrowed the space in which he could plausibly attempt anything outside the formal succession path using ZANUPF internal processes. Tagwirei’s "meet the people" type of rallies with music stars in tow point to a group of people focused on winning hearts and minds both inside and outside ZANUPF. They have money. The other side has passion and entitlement, but without money there is very little political traction in Zimbabwe’s political theatre, where loyalties change based on what is on the table. Politics the world over is about money, that is why Elon Musk claimed that he won the election for Donald Trump, and that is why Trump said you need US$5 billion to become a president in America, it is about money. When you strip away the slogans and the drama, the real engine of political power is financial muscle, whether in Zimbabwe, America, or anywhere else. Tagwirei’s Godfather Mnangagwa understands that politics in Zimbabwe is transactional, and he is investing heavily in shaping perceptions, building networks, and buying influence long before the succession battle formally begins. Those opposed to Mnangagwa and his faction must not wake up tomorrow pretending they did not see this coming. It is obvious that Tagwirei is positioning himself as the most visible, accessible and well financed candidate within ZANUPF. It is also obvious that there is no opposition in Zimbabwe and that Chiwenga’s grip has been terribly loosened in unthinkable ways. Anyone paying attention can see the succession terrain shifting, and those who fail to read these signals will only have themselves to blame when the outcome unfolds. The question for the remnants of the main opposition is simple. What are you doing about 2028? Because while everyone is distracted by the talk of 2030, that talk may turn out to be a political ruse, a deliberate decoy to make us ignore what is unfolding on the ground. 2030 could be the bait that sends General Chiwenga chasing shadows while his real competitor campaigns at grassroots level, spends money, and entrenches himself as a household name. Mnangagwa is a political strategist who has won politically through hook or crook, so it would be a fatal mistake to assume that he has only one plan. A second option is to push for 2030, not with the intention of serving until then, but to block General Chiwenga at a congress and secure enough time to hand over to a successor of his choice after defeating Chiwenga. That is on condition that Chiwenga even has the guts to challenge him for the party leadership, which at the moment looks increasingly doubtful. If General Chiwenga puts his faith in the ZANUPF electoral processes through Congress or an Extraordinary Congress which elects a leader, then he is finished. He will be beaten on the floor even by Kuda Tagwirei, not because of anything else, but because Tagwirei and the Mnangagwa team have the resources that the general might not want to spend, even though he is a wealthy man, or might not actually have available as disposable funds for an internal election campaign he is likely to lose. Mnangagwa also has the power of incumbency, something that has been stripped away from Chiwenga as his lieutenants were retired or died one by one. That erosion of his inner circle has left him exposed, weakened, and without the institutional backing he once relied on. Mnangagwa, meanwhile, has consolidated the state, the party, and the security apparatus in his favour, widening the gulf between the two men. What we are seeing now is the opening of the presidential race, with Mnangagwa’s side fully satisfied that they have degraded Chiwenga’s powers to a point where they can now campaign openly. Where is the general? The consolidation of power in the army through the appointment of General Walter Tapfumaneyi, who worked closely with Tagwirei during the 2023 elections, is a clear signal of the new power architecture. More military purges are coming, including the removal of Chiwenga’s wife from military intelligence, and each one further isolates Chiwenga while tightening Mnangagwa’s control over the security establishment. This systematic dismantling of his support base makes it clear that the succession battle has already begun, and that Chiwenga is being pushed further away from the centres of real power with every move. The Chinese general Sun Tzu teaches that “all warfare is based on deception”, and Mnangagwa has perfected this by using 2030 as a decoy while quietly weakening Chiwenga and allowing Tagwirei to advance. He has also mastered the art of appearing weak when he is strong, and appearing strong when he is weak, creating confusion while he restructures the state and securing loyalty across the security ranks. Those in the media and diplomatic circles know that Mnangagwa deliberately appeared weak on many occasions, and his emissaries would tell diplomats and journalists that he had no power to act on many serious issues because Chiwenga was supposedly too powerful. It was an illusion they deliberately created. They created a fictitious image of an all-powerful General Chiwenga, a narrative that fits perfectly into Sun Tzu’s teaching about appearing weak when you are strong and appearing strong when you are weak. There were also moments when Mnangagwa appeared very strong, such as in 2019 when Chiwenga's side thought of carrying out a coup. Mnangagwa projected firmness, yet behind the scenes he was weak, hesitant, and deeply indecisive in dealing with the unfolding crisis. If you remember the period when the internet was shut down, that moment exposed just how fragile the inner workings of power were, despite the public portrayal of a decisive leader. Mnangagwa’s team, led by Tagwirei, now embodies the wisdom that “victorious warriors win first and then go to war”, planting narratives, building visibility, and mobilising resources long before the battle officially begins. In this environment, the utter disarray in the opposition makes it effortless for ZANUPF to open war fronts within itself, because when the enemy outside has collapsed, the real contest becomes the fight to inherit the throne.

While we are busy focused on the 2030 presidential term extension theatrics, the presidential race to take over from President Emmerson Mnangagwa is already in full swing inside ZANUPF. It is an open secret that Mnangagwa’s preferred successor is businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei, and the dark horse is General Valerio Sibanda, who retired from the army in an announcement made yesterday by the presidency. Tagwirei is already on a campaign trail which some have not observed, and all the issues he is raising are carefully crafted to resonate with ordinary citizens, shifting from liberation struggle slogans like Pasi neMhandu to Pasi neNhamo and Mari Muhomwe. He is deliberately rebranding himself as a champion of economic grievances, positioning his message to speak directly to poverty, hardship, and the cost of living, rather than the old liberation rhetoric. This is not accidental, his nemesis is a soldier and military general whose track record is rooted in Zimbabwe's excesses. What Tagwirei is doing is planting in his rallies a political seed that he hopes will germinate between now and 2027, when the ZANUPF Congress is expected to elect a new leader, or even earlier if an extraordinary congress is convened as some in the ruling party suspect might happen. That seed is intended to carry him into 2028, when the general election is due, if he succeeds in taking over should his principal, President Mnangagwa, not change his mind or Chiwenga stages a dramatic miracle coup. He is laying the groundwork early, shaping public perception, opinion and positioning himself as the natural successor by tapping into economic frustrations that ordinary citizens understand and feel every day. The elites see things differently, but it is the poor in townships and rural Zimbabwe who are being targeted with this messaging. When I look at the political landscape in Zimbabwe today, I see nobody else, either in the opposition or in ZANUPF, offering a clear and solid message that speaks to the people’s real needs. What we consider logical in elite circles does not sell to the poor, their needs are immediate. They want solutions for today, regardless of who created the problems that require solutions. While the educated elites talk about root-cause analysis and solutions for a distant future in their scenarios, the ordinary citizens want Sapatina, a euphemism for something that comes today, coined by a man who was perfectly happy eating chicken and chips/fries at State House. Our struggles are different. Vice President General Constantino Chiwenga, who thought he was a shoo in to become the next president after leading a coup against Robert Mugabe and making way for Mnangagwa, is now talking about corruption, something we have discussed for years to appeal to the masses. But Tagwirei is positioning himself differently. He is in full campaign mode, planting messages aimed at securing his place in the succession race, messages of economic prosperity. He is speaking to the daily needs of ZANUPF supporters and Zimbabweans in general. He is placing himself before the electorate, travelling, being visible, leveraging state linked platforms, and promising youths economic empowerment. Meanwhile, the general is speaking in closed boardrooms, and nobody has heard him speak directly to his presidential ambitions outside his own circle. Tagwirei is out in the open shaping a constituency, while Chiwenga remains confined to private spaces that do not build political momentum. That does not look regular to me unless he has an ace up his sleeves, a coup, because a coup does not require much talking. But as Mnangagwa shuts all the options once available to him by creating a state security sector in his own image, the prospects of a coup become slimmer with each move made by Mnangagwa. In closing those doors and pathways, Mnangagwa has effectively weakened Chiwenga’s leverage and narrowed the space in which he could plausibly attempt anything outside the formal succession path using ZANUPF internal processes. Tagwirei’s "meet the people" type of rallies with music stars in tow point to a group of people focused on winning hearts and minds both inside and outside ZANUPF. They have money. The other side has passion and entitlement, but without money there is very little political traction in Zimbabwe’s political theatre, where loyalties change based on what is on the table. Politics the world over is about money, that is why Elon Musk claimed that he won the election for Donald Trump, and that is why Trump said you need US$5 billion to become a president in America, it is about money. When you strip away the slogans and the drama, the real engine of political power is financial muscle, whether in Zimbabwe, America, or anywhere else. Tagwirei’s Godfather Mnangagwa understands that politics in Zimbabwe is transactional, and he is investing heavily in shaping perceptions, building networks, and buying influence long before the succession battle formally begins. Those opposed to Mnangagwa and his faction must not wake up tomorrow pretending they did not see this coming. It is obvious that Tagwirei is positioning himself as the most visible, accessible and well financed candidate within ZANUPF. It is also obvious that there is no opposition in Zimbabwe and that Chiwenga’s grip has been terribly loosened in unthinkable ways. Anyone paying attention can see the succession terrain shifting, and those who fail to read these signals will only have themselves to blame when the outcome unfolds. The question for the remnants of the main opposition is simple. What are you doing about 2028? Because while everyone is distracted by the talk of 2030, that talk may turn out to be a political ruse, a deliberate decoy to make us ignore what is unfolding on the ground. 2030 could be the bait that sends General Chiwenga chasing shadows while his real competitor campaigns at grassroots level, spends money, and entrenches himself as a household name. Mnangagwa is a political strategist who has won politically through hook or crook, so it would be a fatal mistake to assume that he has only one plan. A second option is to push for 2030, not with the intention of serving until then, but to block General Chiwenga at a congress and secure enough time to hand over to a successor of his choice after defeating Chiwenga. That is on condition that Chiwenga even has the guts to challenge him for the party leadership, which at the moment looks increasingly doubtful. If General Chiwenga puts his faith in the ZANUPF electoral processes through Congress or an Extraordinary Congress which elects a leader, then he is finished. He will be beaten on the floor even by Kuda Tagwirei, not because of anything else, but because Tagwirei and the Mnangagwa team have the resources that the general might not want to spend, even though he is a wealthy man, or might not actually have available as disposable funds for an internal election campaign he is likely to lose. Mnangagwa also has the power of incumbency, something that has been stripped away from Chiwenga as his lieutenants were retired or died one by one. That erosion of his inner circle has left him exposed, weakened, and without the institutional backing he once relied on. Mnangagwa, meanwhile, has consolidated the state, the party, and the security apparatus in his favour, widening the gulf between the two men. What we are seeing now is the opening of the presidential race, with Mnangagwa’s side fully satisfied that they have degraded Chiwenga’s powers to a point where they can now campaign openly. Where is the general? The consolidation of power in the army through the appointment of General Walter Tapfumaneyi, who worked closely with Tagwirei during the 2023 elections, is a clear signal of the new power architecture. More military purges are coming, including the removal of Chiwenga’s wife from military intelligence, and each one further isolates Chiwenga while tightening Mnangagwa’s control over the security establishment. This systematic dismantling of his support base makes it clear that the succession battle has already begun, and that Chiwenga is being pushed further away from the centres of real power with every move. The Chinese general Sun Tzu teaches that “all warfare is based on deception”, and Mnangagwa has perfected this by using 2030 as a decoy while quietly weakening Chiwenga and allowing Tagwirei to advance. He has also mastered the art of appearing weak when he is strong, and appearing strong when he is weak, creating confusion while he restructures the state and securing loyalty across the security ranks. Those in the media and diplomatic circles know that Mnangagwa deliberately appeared weak on many occasions, and his emissaries would tell diplomats and journalists that he had no power to act on many serious issues because Chiwenga was supposedly too powerful. It was an illusion they deliberately created. They created a fictitious image of an all-powerful General Chiwenga, a narrative that fits perfectly into Sun Tzu’s teaching about appearing weak when you are strong and appearing strong when you are weak. There were also moments when Mnangagwa appeared very strong, such as in 2019 when Chiwenga's side thought of carrying out a coup. Mnangagwa projected firmness, yet behind the scenes he was weak, hesitant, and deeply indecisive in dealing with the unfolding crisis. If you remember the period when the internet was shut down, that moment exposed just how fragile the inner workings of power were, despite the public portrayal of a decisive leader. Mnangagwa’s team, led by Tagwirei, now embodies the wisdom that “victorious warriors win first and then go to war”, planting narratives, building visibility, and mobilising resources long before the battle officially begins. In this environment, the utter disarray in the opposition makes it effortless for ZANUPF to open war fronts within itself, because when the enemy outside has collapsed, the real contest becomes the fight to inherit the throne.

Hopewell Chin’ono

57,979 views • 8 months ago

$"900,000 BARRELS JUST ARRIVED IN JAPAN": President Trump's Truth Social Post Lands as Beijing's Hormuz Strategy Officially Implodes — Inside the Tanker That Just Rewrote the Indo-Pacific Energy Map The M/V Otis didn't just dock in Tokyo Bay. It docked on top of the CCP's entire wedge-strategy thesis. "HUGE MOMENT! Asia is getting their oil from the United States now. 900,000 barrels just arrived in Japan. America will lead the charge on oil dominance." President Trump's post — accompanied by an ANN News screenshot of an American crude tanker easing into Tokyo Bay at dawn — is doing the kind of work that ten policy white papers cannot. It is taking a moment of strategic transformation and stamping it onto the public consciousness in a single image: U.S. oil. Japanese port. Middle East bypassed. And for once, the substance behind the showmanship checks out. What Actually Happened in Tokyo Bay The tanker is the Suezmax-class M/V Otis (IMO 9408217). On the morning of Sunday, April 26, she eased up to an offshore jetty in Tokyo Bay carrying approximately 910,000 barrels of Texas light crude oil bound for a refinery in Chiba Prefecture. The cargo was transferred through an undersea pipeline to a facility operated by Cosmo Oil, a subsidiary of Cosmo Energy Holdings, where it will be processed into petroleum products including gasoline for domestic distribution. The voyage itself is the part that matters strategically. The Otis loaded in Texas on March 22 and completed a roughly 35-day voyage through the Panama Canal — one of the largest direct U.S. crude deliveries to Japan in years. The alternative routing — Cape of Good Hope, which takes about 55 days — was bypassed in favor of the Panama Canal, cutting transit time by roughly 20 days. This is the operational answer to a question Beijing assumed had no answer: Can American crude actually reach Japanese refineries fast enough, in sufficient volume, to matter when Hormuz is contested? The Otis is the receipt. The Real Number Is Not 910,000. It's 4x. A single tanker, as honest reporting from noted, amounts to less than one day's consumption in Japan. Taken in isolation, 910,000 barrels is a symbol, not a strategy. The strategy lives in the trendline. According to Japanese government documents reviewed by Reuters, Japanese imports of U.S. crude oil for May will be four times higher than they were a year earlier — up from a May 2025 baseline of 189,000 barrels daily, which represented about 8% of total imports that month. Tokyo also expects that by May, it will have secured half of its imports from suppliers outside the Middle East, with the United States the largest among those alternative suppliers, joined by Malaysia, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Nigeria, and Angola. For a country that historically sourced as much as 95% of its oil from the Middle East, this is the fastest reorientation of a G7 energy supply chain in the post-Cold War era. The Otis is the first tanker in a queue, not the last. The $56 Billion Bet Behind the Tanker None of this is happening on autopilot. On March 14, at the Asia-Pacific Energy Security Forum in Tokyo, Japan signed agreements worth up to $56 billion with the United States covering oil, natural gas, and LNG purchases and investments — sitting inside the broader framework from the 2025 U.S.-Japan trade agreement, under which Japan pledged $550 billion in U.S. investments, with energy as a key pillar. Five days later, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi — Japan's first woman prime minister and one of the most China-skeptical leaders Tokyo has produced in a generation — walked into the Oval Office and, in front of cameras, embraced President Trump. The visit had a few rough edges: Trump's unprompted Pearl Harbor reference, made when a Japanese reporter asked why allies hadn't been warned about the February 28 strike on Iran, appeared to take Takaichi aback. But on substance the meeting did exactly what an alliance summit is supposed to do — it pre-positioned the energy pivot the Otis would later make material. By May 19, that pivot had widened into a trilateral. In Seoul, President Lee Jae-myung and Prime Minister Takaichi agreed to expand LNG cooperation under the bilateral Supply and Demand Cooperation Agreement signed in March, and to deepen information sharing and communication channels related to crude oil supply, demand, and stockpiling — explicitly framed by Seoul as a vehicle for South Korea–Japan and South Korea–U.S.–Japan cooperation for regional peace and stability. The Hormuz shock was supposed to fracture this triangle. Instead, it welded it. What Beijing Got Wrong — And Why It Matters The Chinese Communist Party's strategic miscalculation in the Hormuz file was not merely tactical. It was conceptual. For roughly a decade, Beijing's working thesis on Asian energy security has been that the United States cannot credibly underwrite the region from outside the Persian Gulf, and that any Middle East flashpoint would therefore translate into political leverage for China — the buyer of last resort with the deepest stockpiles, the longest supply contracts, and the most flexible sanctions tolerance. The thesis has just failed three stress tests at once. First, the logistics held. Alaskan crude can reach Japanese refineries via Pacific routes about a week faster than Middle Eastern shipments, and Texas crude via Panama — as the Otis proved — gets there in 35 days. Tokyo is now actively weighing expanded Alaskan imports and a joint U.S.-Japan strategic crude reserve arrangement. Second, the political will held. Takaichi did not hedge. She unilaterally began releasing 15 days' worth of private-sector reserves from March 16, followed by a month's worth of state-held oil, and committed Japan to participating in the IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release, with Japan contributing 80 million barrels — 54 million in crude and 26 million in oil products. Third — and most damaging to Beijing's strategic narrative — China's own position deteriorated. While Tokyo was diversifying westward across the Pacific, Iran continued sending the bulk of the crude still moving — roughly 1.22 million barrels per day — to China, after a record 2.16 million bpd in February that was entirely destined for Beijing as it amassed reserves. The CCP's "energy security" turned out to be a deeper handcuff to a sanctioned, militarily degraded supplier whose primary export terminal — Kharg Island, the departure point for roughly 90% of Iran's crude exports — has been struck by U.S. forces. Beijing did not de-risk. It concentrated risk. And when Trump publicly pressured Beijing to help secure Hormuz on the grounds that 90% of Chinese oil flowed through it, Chinese state spokespeople were reduced to publicly emphasizing that the country had "enough" energy reserves — an answer that managed to be both defensive and, in strategic terms, an admission. The Honest Caveats Serious analysis requires acknowledging what the headline glosses over. The Otis cargo is, by Japan's own ministry, less than one day's consumption. U.S. crude exports cannot fully substitute for Middle Eastern barrels: industry analysts cited by Axios put the realistic monthly ceiling for U.S. crude exports in the 5.5 million bpd range, with Gulf Coast port and terminal capacity acting as a hard infrastructure limit. The Iran war has been genuinely costly — Brent crude topped $110 a barrel in late March before retreating to roughly $98 by late May — and the global growth picture has been marked down accordingly. There are also legitimate technical questions about crude grade compatibility (U.S. light sweet vs. Middle Eastern medium sour) that Japanese refineries will need to manage. The diversification away from Hormuz is real, but it is not free, not frictionless, and not complete. These caveats sharpen the conclusion. They do not invert it. The Strategic Bottom Line Three months ago, the Hormuz file was supposed to be the lever that pried Tokyo loose from Washington. The arithmetic looked plausible on paper: Japan and South Korea are the third- and fourth-largest destinations for crude moving through the Strait of Hormuz, behind only China and India. Pain there should, in theory, have created political space for Beijing. It didn't. The pain became the catalyst. A $56 billion energy package. A four-fold surge in U.S. crude bound for Japanese refineries. A Suezmax tanker easing into Tokyo Bay at dawn carrying 910,000 barrels from Texas. A trilateral Tokyo–Seoul–Washington cooperation framework formalized in the middle of a war Beijing was counting on to crack it. There is a lesson here for anyone still treating CCP economic statecraft as inevitable: leverage that depends on your rival having no alternative evaporates the moment one is built. Tokyo built one. Washington underwrote it. Trump is now broadcasting it. And the manifests in Yokohama harbor are the proof. The alliance held. The wedge failed. The map has been redrawn — and the next tanker is already loading. Original article by me Aric Chen. Views are my own — welcome to discuss! © 2026 Aric Chen. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use will be reported under the DMCA.$

"900,000 BARRELS JUST ARRIVED IN JAPAN": President Trump's Truth Social Post Lands as Beijing's Hormuz Strategy Officially Implodes — Inside the Tanker That Just Rewrote the Indo-Pacific Energy Map The M/V Otis didn't just dock in Tokyo Bay. It docked on top of the CCP's entire wedge-strategy thesis. "HUGE MOMENT! Asia is getting their oil from the United States now. 900,000 barrels just arrived in Japan. America will lead the charge on oil dominance." President Trump's post — accompanied by an ANN News screenshot of an American crude tanker easing into Tokyo Bay at dawn — is doing the kind of work that ten policy white papers cannot. It is taking a moment of strategic transformation and stamping it onto the public consciousness in a single image: U.S. oil. Japanese port. Middle East bypassed. And for once, the substance behind the showmanship checks out. What Actually Happened in Tokyo Bay The tanker is the Suezmax-class M/V Otis (IMO 9408217). On the morning of Sunday, April 26, she eased up to an offshore jetty in Tokyo Bay carrying approximately 910,000 barrels of Texas light crude oil bound for a refinery in Chiba Prefecture. The cargo was transferred through an undersea pipeline to a facility operated by Cosmo Oil, a subsidiary of Cosmo Energy Holdings, where it will be processed into petroleum products including gasoline for domestic distribution. The voyage itself is the part that matters strategically. The Otis loaded in Texas on March 22 and completed a roughly 35-day voyage through the Panama Canal — one of the largest direct U.S. crude deliveries to Japan in years. The alternative routing — Cape of Good Hope, which takes about 55 days — was bypassed in favor of the Panama Canal, cutting transit time by roughly 20 days. This is the operational answer to a question Beijing assumed had no answer: Can American crude actually reach Japanese refineries fast enough, in sufficient volume, to matter when Hormuz is contested? The Otis is the receipt. The Real Number Is Not 910,000. It's 4x. A single tanker, as honest reporting from noted, amounts to less than one day's consumption in Japan. Taken in isolation, 910,000 barrels is a symbol, not a strategy. The strategy lives in the trendline. According to Japanese government documents reviewed by Reuters, Japanese imports of U.S. crude oil for May will be four times higher than they were a year earlier — up from a May 2025 baseline of 189,000 barrels daily, which represented about 8% of total imports that month. Tokyo also expects that by May, it will have secured half of its imports from suppliers outside the Middle East, with the United States the largest among those alternative suppliers, joined by Malaysia, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Nigeria, and Angola. For a country that historically sourced as much as 95% of its oil from the Middle East, this is the fastest reorientation of a G7 energy supply chain in the post-Cold War era. The Otis is the first tanker in a queue, not the last. The $56 Billion Bet Behind the Tanker None of this is happening on autopilot. On March 14, at the Asia-Pacific Energy Security Forum in Tokyo, Japan signed agreements worth up to $56 billion with the United States covering oil, natural gas, and LNG purchases and investments — sitting inside the broader framework from the 2025 U.S.-Japan trade agreement, under which Japan pledged $550 billion in U.S. investments, with energy as a key pillar. Five days later, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi — Japan's first woman prime minister and one of the most China-skeptical leaders Tokyo has produced in a generation — walked into the Oval Office and, in front of cameras, embraced President Trump. The visit had a few rough edges: Trump's unprompted Pearl Harbor reference, made when a Japanese reporter asked why allies hadn't been warned about the February 28 strike on Iran, appeared to take Takaichi aback. But on substance the meeting did exactly what an alliance summit is supposed to do — it pre-positioned the energy pivot the Otis would later make material. By May 19, that pivot had widened into a trilateral. In Seoul, President Lee Jae-myung and Prime Minister Takaichi agreed to expand LNG cooperation under the bilateral Supply and Demand Cooperation Agreement signed in March, and to deepen information sharing and communication channels related to crude oil supply, demand, and stockpiling — explicitly framed by Seoul as a vehicle for South Korea–Japan and South Korea–U.S.–Japan cooperation for regional peace and stability. The Hormuz shock was supposed to fracture this triangle. Instead, it welded it. What Beijing Got Wrong — And Why It Matters The Chinese Communist Party's strategic miscalculation in the Hormuz file was not merely tactical. It was conceptual. For roughly a decade, Beijing's working thesis on Asian energy security has been that the United States cannot credibly underwrite the region from outside the Persian Gulf, and that any Middle East flashpoint would therefore translate into political leverage for China — the buyer of last resort with the deepest stockpiles, the longest supply contracts, and the most flexible sanctions tolerance. The thesis has just failed three stress tests at once. First, the logistics held. Alaskan crude can reach Japanese refineries via Pacific routes about a week faster than Middle Eastern shipments, and Texas crude via Panama — as the Otis proved — gets there in 35 days. Tokyo is now actively weighing expanded Alaskan imports and a joint U.S.-Japan strategic crude reserve arrangement. Second, the political will held. Takaichi did not hedge. She unilaterally began releasing 15 days' worth of private-sector reserves from March 16, followed by a month's worth of state-held oil, and committed Japan to participating in the IEA's coordinated 400-million-barrel release, with Japan contributing 80 million barrels — 54 million in crude and 26 million in oil products. Third — and most damaging to Beijing's strategic narrative — China's own position deteriorated. While Tokyo was diversifying westward across the Pacific, Iran continued sending the bulk of the crude still moving — roughly 1.22 million barrels per day — to China, after a record 2.16 million bpd in February that was entirely destined for Beijing as it amassed reserves. The CCP's "energy security" turned out to be a deeper handcuff to a sanctioned, militarily degraded supplier whose primary export terminal — Kharg Island, the departure point for roughly 90% of Iran's crude exports — has been struck by U.S. forces. Beijing did not de-risk. It concentrated risk. And when Trump publicly pressured Beijing to help secure Hormuz on the grounds that 90% of Chinese oil flowed through it, Chinese state spokespeople were reduced to publicly emphasizing that the country had "enough" energy reserves — an answer that managed to be both defensive and, in strategic terms, an admission. The Honest Caveats Serious analysis requires acknowledging what the headline glosses over. The Otis cargo is, by Japan's own ministry, less than one day's consumption. U.S. crude exports cannot fully substitute for Middle Eastern barrels: industry analysts cited by Axios put the realistic monthly ceiling for U.S. crude exports in the 5.5 million bpd range, with Gulf Coast port and terminal capacity acting as a hard infrastructure limit. The Iran war has been genuinely costly — Brent crude topped $110 a barrel in late March before retreating to roughly $98 by late May — and the global growth picture has been marked down accordingly. There are also legitimate technical questions about crude grade compatibility (U.S. light sweet vs. Middle Eastern medium sour) that Japanese refineries will need to manage. The diversification away from Hormuz is real, but it is not free, not frictionless, and not complete. These caveats sharpen the conclusion. They do not invert it. The Strategic Bottom Line Three months ago, the Hormuz file was supposed to be the lever that pried Tokyo loose from Washington. The arithmetic looked plausible on paper: Japan and South Korea are the third- and fourth-largest destinations for crude moving through the Strait of Hormuz, behind only China and India. Pain there should, in theory, have created political space for Beijing. It didn't. The pain became the catalyst. A $56 billion energy package. A four-fold surge in U.S. crude bound for Japanese refineries. A Suezmax tanker easing into Tokyo Bay at dawn carrying 910,000 barrels from Texas. A trilateral Tokyo–Seoul–Washington cooperation framework formalized in the middle of a war Beijing was counting on to crack it. There is a lesson here for anyone still treating CCP economic statecraft as inevitable: leverage that depends on your rival having no alternative evaporates the moment one is built. Tokyo built one. Washington underwrote it. Trump is now broadcasting it. And the manifests in Yokohama harbor are the proof. The alliance held. The wedge failed. The map has been redrawn — and the next tanker is already loading. Original article by me Aric Chen. Views are my own — welcome to discuss! © 2026 Aric Chen. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use will be reported under the DMCA.

Aric Chen

17,007 views • 1 month ago