Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

NDAA Section 219 is headed for a House vote tomorrow, and it would permanently integrate U.S. military technology and supply chains with Israel’s. If passed, this wouldn’t be a temporary arrangement; it would lock in a long-term defense merger that reaches across presidential administrations and pushes America even further...

RedactedNews's profile picture

Redacted

303,934 subscribers

440,815 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyEducationNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

⚡️New: "I don't think we should integrate our military with anybody. Not even the Bahamas." The House passed the National Defense Authorization Act yesterday 216-212, with Section 219 intact - a provision that would further integrate U.S. and Israeli military research, weapons development, technology, and supply chains. The bill now moves to the Senate. Drop Site's Julian Andreone asked senators what they think, and Republicans were split. Sen. Ted Cruz argued that Israel to is an ally to the U.S. like any other, like Great Britain, and dismissed concerns as overblown. Sen. Bernie Moreno pushed back, saying he opposes military integration with any country.
2:59

⚡️New: "I don't think we should integrate our military with anybody. Not even the Bahamas." The House passed the National Defense Authorization Act yesterday 216-212, with Section 219 intact - a provision that would further integrate U.S. and Israeli military research, weapons development, technology, and supply chains. The bill now moves to the Senate. Drop Site's Julian Andreone asked senators what they think, and Republicans were split. Sen. Ted Cruz argued that Israel to is an ally to the U.S. like any other, like Great Britain, and dismissed concerns as overblown. Sen. Bernie Moreno pushed back, saying he opposes military integration with any country.

Drop Site

59,362 views • 1 month ago

Thomas Massie issues one last warning to Americans about the dangers of Section 219, which would permanently merge the United States and Israeli military supply chains and outlast any presidency. This would permanently integrate the U.S. military supply chains with Israel's. "We don't have this kind of bilateral agreement with any other country." "This project will have a lifespan that outlasts the commander in chief, regardless of who the next president is."
2:28

Thomas Massie issues one last warning to Americans about the dangers of Section 219, which would permanently merge the United States and Israeli military supply chains and outlast any presidency. This would permanently integrate the U.S. military supply chains with Israel's. "We don't have this kind of bilateral agreement with any other country." "This project will have a lifespan that outlasts the commander in chief, regardless of who the next president is."

Shadow of Ezra

216,563 views • 1 month ago

USS LIBERTY SURVIVOR ON SECTION 219: “THIS IS A BETRAYAL” Silver Star–decorated Marine Staff Sergeant Bryce Lockwood, one of the last living USS Liberty survivors, is warning that the new NDAA crosses a dangerous line. Section 219. The U.S.–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative would fuse American military technology, research, and supply chains with Israel’s. Sgt. Lockwood warns that it is not normal alliance coordination. It is “surrendering the United States military to the government of Israel.” For a veteran who already lived through one deadly ally betrayal, this looks like Washington is trying to lock in another one through permanent law.
1:33

USS LIBERTY SURVIVOR ON SECTION 219: “THIS IS A BETRAYAL” Silver Star–decorated Marine Staff Sergeant Bryce Lockwood, one of the last living USS Liberty survivors, is warning that the new NDAA crosses a dangerous line. Section 219. The U.S.–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative would fuse American military technology, research, and supply chains with Israel’s. Sgt. Lockwood warns that it is not normal alliance coordination. It is “surrendering the United States military to the government of Israel.” For a veteran who already lived through one deadly ally betrayal, this looks like Washington is trying to lock in another one through permanent law.

Redacted

14,456 views • 29 days ago

Massie: I think what’s even more concerning is, in the NDAA, Section 219, which is going to start commingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s. It doesn’t make sense to do that with a country of 10 million people. But they’ve got that in the NDAA. I’m told that’s not coming up this week, but we know it’s going to come up sometime—probably soon. So I’ve offered an amendment to strip Section 219—it was called Section 224—from that bill.
1:02

Massie: I think what’s even more concerning is, in the NDAA, Section 219, which is going to start commingling our military supply chains and technology with Israel’s. It doesn’t make sense to do that with a country of 10 million people. But they’ve got that in the NDAA. I’m told that’s not coming up this week, but we know it’s going to come up sometime—probably soon. So I’ve offered an amendment to strip Section 219—it was called Section 224—from that bill.

Acyn

361,528 views • 1 month ago

Hidden inside the Senate’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is Section 1217, a provision that would deepen U.S.-Israel military integration and expand cooperation between the Pentagon and Israel’s military technology sector. The House never got a vote on it. The Senate still has a chance to remove it. Call your senators today: 202-224-3121 Tell them to strip Section 1217 from the NDAA and reject deeper military integration with Israel. No more support for Israel’s wars. No more endless militarization. Invest in people, not war
1:22

Hidden inside the Senate’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is Section 1217, a provision that would deepen U.S.-Israel military integration and expand cooperation between the Pentagon and Israel’s military technology sector. The House never got a vote on it. The Senate still has a chance to remove it. Call your senators today: 202-224-3121 Tell them to strip Section 1217 from the NDAA and reject deeper military integration with Israel. No more support for Israel’s wars. No more endless militarization. Invest in people, not war

Medea Benjamin

35,227 views • 1 month ago

Attention — Section 224 is not dead. It’s been quietly renamed Section 219 and is still moving forward in the House NDAA right now. Once this passes and gets written into law, it creates a permanent framework that deeply integrates America’s military and defense technology with Israel — missile defense, AI, autonomous weapons, cyber, quantum, and more. Critics warn this effectively merges key capabilities between the two nations’ military and surveillance systems in ways that will be extremely difficult to undo later. No standalone vote. No real debate. Just tucked into the massive defense bill. This is happening today. Pay attention."
2:58

Attention — Section 224 is not dead. It’s been quietly renamed Section 219 and is still moving forward in the House NDAA right now. Once this passes and gets written into law, it creates a permanent framework that deeply integrates America’s military and defense technology with Israel — missile defense, AI, autonomous weapons, cyber, quantum, and more. Critics warn this effectively merges key capabilities between the two nations’ military and surveillance systems in ways that will be extremely difficult to undo later. No standalone vote. No real debate. Just tucked into the massive defense bill. This is happening today. Pay attention."

Matt Baker

72,180 views • 1 month ago

Andreone: The NDAA passed with Section 219. This streamlines the process of sort of merging U.S. and Israeli military defense technology. I wonder what your thoughts are on that and whether that’s a good thing for the U.S.? Cruz: The question you ask is not an honest description of what that is. Andreone: Netanyahu wrote a letter to Congress saying exactly that.
1:13

Andreone: The NDAA passed with Section 219. This streamlines the process of sort of merging U.S. and Israeli military defense technology. I wonder what your thoughts are on that and whether that’s a good thing for the U.S.? Cruz: The question you ask is not an honest description of what that is. Andreone: Netanyahu wrote a letter to Congress saying exactly that.

Acyn

208,419 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇱Buried inside the NDAA is a provision that could permanently hardwire Israel into America's defense architecture. The proposal would expand Israeli access to U.S. military technology, deepen defense system integration, and tie American defense planning directly to Israeli military priorities. Not a treaty, not a vote, a budget bill. Former State Department official Josh Paul is raising the alarm: "unprecedented access to American technology and provide incredible leverage over America's own defence priorities." Here's what makes this different from normal military aid: integration at this level doesn't unwind easily. Future administrations that want to adjust the relationship would be fighting their own military-industrial system to do it. No public debate, no treaty ratification, just a clause in a defense bill that most members of Congress won't read. If this passes, the question of how close the U.S. gets to Israel stops being a policy decision and starts being a structural reality. Source: Al Jazeera Source: Middle East Eye (YouTube)
0:51

🇺🇸🇮🇱Buried inside the NDAA is a provision that could permanently hardwire Israel into America's defense architecture. The proposal would expand Israeli access to U.S. military technology, deepen defense system integration, and tie American defense planning directly to Israeli military priorities. Not a treaty, not a vote, a budget bill. Former State Department official Josh Paul is raising the alarm: "unprecedented access to American technology and provide incredible leverage over America's own defence priorities." Here's what makes this different from normal military aid: integration at this level doesn't unwind easily. Future administrations that want to adjust the relationship would be fighting their own military-industrial system to do it. No public debate, no treaty ratification, just a clause in a defense bill that most members of Congress won't read. If this passes, the question of how close the U.S. gets to Israel stops being a policy decision and starts being a structural reality. Source: Al Jazeera Source: Middle East Eye (YouTube)

Mario Nawfal

33,085 views • 2 months ago

The proposal in NDAA Section 224 to further integrate the U.S. and Israeli militaries would be an extraordinary step for active-duty service members. It threatens American sovereignty by reducing the ability of elected officials to independently set U.S. foreign and defense policy, while making Israeli interests a more permanent part of America’s military decision-making process. At a time when voters are increasingly questioning the U.S.-Israel relationship, Congress appears poised to make that alliance even more deeply embedded and far more difficult to unwind in the future. Why is Congress pushing this measure, and what would its long-term consequences be for American policy and military independence? I discuss this and more with Col. Douglas Macgregor.
12:41

The proposal in NDAA Section 224 to further integrate the U.S. and Israeli militaries would be an extraordinary step for active-duty service members. It threatens American sovereignty by reducing the ability of elected officials to independently set U.S. foreign and defense policy, while making Israeli interests a more permanent part of America’s military decision-making process. At a time when voters are increasingly questioning the U.S.-Israel relationship, Congress appears poised to make that alliance even more deeply embedded and far more difficult to unwind in the future. Why is Congress pushing this measure, and what would its long-term consequences be for American policy and military independence? I discuss this and more with Col. Douglas Macgregor.

Ben Swann

28,098 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇱 The House just passed U.S.-Israel defense integration in the NDAA. It even refused to let members vote on removing it. Ana Kasparian says the question of how much sway Israel holds over Washington stopped being interesting. The Rules Committee answered it. Section 219 sets up a Pentagon "executive agent" to run joint U.S.-Israel defense R&D, testing and industrial cooperation. Massie and Khanna filed a bipartisan amendment to strip it. The Rules Committee never let it reach the floor. Ana Kasparian
2:18

🇺🇸🇮🇱 The House just passed U.S.-Israel defense integration in the NDAA. It even refused to let members vote on removing it. Ana Kasparian says the question of how much sway Israel holds over Washington stopped being interesting. The Rules Committee answered it. Section 219 sets up a Pentagon "executive agent" to run joint U.S.-Israel defense R&D, testing and industrial cooperation. Massie and Khanna filed a bipartisan amendment to strip it. The Rules Committee never let it reach the floor. Ana Kasparian

Mario Nawfal

120,260 views • 1 month ago

“Netanyahu Is a Deep Dark Son of a B*tch” Professor Jeffrey Sachs’ sentiment should be the sentiment of every true American and it should have been felt years ago, but especially now. Today, Netanyahu successfully pushed Congress toward merging the U.S. military with Isræl as a backdoor mechanism to secure further HIDDEN aid and military support for Isræl. The NDAA Section 219 vote today includes language that would: “direct the Pentagon to integrate U.S. and Israeli military technology, supply chains, and industrial capacity.” This is a historic decision before Congress and all 2013 republicans voted yes in favor except Thomas Massie, While Democrats 205 voted against and only 5 supported it. Remember the traitor names. Remember the traitor votes. ALL MUST be voted out next election Democrats, Republicans, and Independents alike. 1/3 🧵⤵️
2:16

“Netanyahu Is a Deep Dark Son of a B*tch” Professor Jeffrey Sachs’ sentiment should be the sentiment of every true American and it should have been felt years ago, but especially now. Today, Netanyahu successfully pushed Congress toward merging the U.S. military with Isræl as a backdoor mechanism to secure further HIDDEN aid and military support for Isræl. The NDAA Section 219 vote today includes language that would: “direct the Pentagon to integrate U.S. and Israeli military technology, supply chains, and industrial capacity.” This is a historic decision before Congress and all 2013 republicans voted yes in favor except Thomas Massie, While Democrats 205 voted against and only 5 supported it. Remember the traitor names. Remember the traitor votes. ALL MUST be voted out next election Democrats, Republicans, and Independents alike. 1/3 🧵⤵️

Phantom Pain

65,628 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: President Biden just explicitly called out Speaker Mike Johnson on the Ukraine Funding bill. "Early this morning, the United States Senate voted overwhelmingly by a margin of 70-29 to move forward with the bipartisan national security bill. Now it moves to the House, and I urge Speaker Johnson to bring it to the floor immediately. There is no question that if the Senate bill is put to a vote in the House of Representatives, it would pass. So I call on the Speaker to let the full House speak its mind and not allow a minority of the most extreme voices in the House to block this bill from even being voted on." Shouldn't the House vote? Isn't that what Democracy is about?
0:40

BREAKING: President Biden just explicitly called out Speaker Mike Johnson on the Ukraine Funding bill. "Early this morning, the United States Senate voted overwhelmingly by a margin of 70-29 to move forward with the bipartisan national security bill. Now it moves to the House, and I urge Speaker Johnson to bring it to the floor immediately. There is no question that if the Senate bill is put to a vote in the House of Representatives, it would pass. So I call on the Speaker to let the full House speak its mind and not allow a minority of the most extreme voices in the House to block this bill from even being voted on." Shouldn't the House vote? Isn't that what Democracy is about?

Ed Krassenstein

1,253,160 views • 2 years ago

It would be a shame if the White House moved on from Iran in a few days. This is not a one-and-done operation. The U.S. must carry through.
3:52

It would be a shame if the White House moved on from Iran in a few days. This is not a one-and-done operation. The U.S. must carry through.

John Bolton

119,719 views • 5 months ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇱 A provision buried inside the NDAA would permanently weave Israeli defense interests into America's own military industrial complex, and even pro-Israel military officials are against it. Host Randy Manner breaks down how the measure expands access to U.S. technology, integrates defense supply chains, and binds American defense planning to Israeli military priorities. "Even I'm against it because it could be interpreted in ways that just give Israel too much access to the classified intelligence, as well as technology that the Americans have." Nobody in mainstream media is talking about this. Why not?
3:54

🇺🇸 🇮🇱 A provision buried inside the NDAA would permanently weave Israeli defense interests into America's own military industrial complex, and even pro-Israel military officials are against it. Host Randy Manner breaks down how the measure expands access to U.S. technology, integrates defense supply chains, and binds American defense planning to Israeli military priorities. "Even I'm against it because it could be interpreted in ways that just give Israel too much access to the classified intelligence, as well as technology that the Americans have." Nobody in mainstream media is talking about this. Why not?

Mario Nawfal

64,320 views • 2 months ago

Wha?? Very interesting… take a listen. In fact, listen to this twice. Rep. Lauren Boebert addressed why she missed a critical vote on the (NDAA) Section 219, US-Israel Defense Integration Into the annual defense bill. Boebert said unnamed GOP staffers “lied to her” during negotiations in a backroom deal. She claimed this led her to be absent when the vote closed. She was in a national security meeting with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, where she secured a commitment to strip “Section 219” (related to protecting U.S. intellectual property and preventing bureaucrats from giving away secrets) from the final NDAA in conference. She said the vote closed “sooner than expected” before those talks wrapped up. She emphasized this isn’t the final version and she’ll get another chance to vote after conference. She reveals the the Trump White House & Pete Hegseth DO NOT want Section 219 in the bill. Section 219 was introduced in the House by Reps. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas) and Don Davis (D-N.C.) with companion legislation from Sens. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).
1:16

Wha?? Very interesting… take a listen. In fact, listen to this twice. Rep. Lauren Boebert addressed why she missed a critical vote on the (NDAA) Section 219, US-Israel Defense Integration Into the annual defense bill. Boebert said unnamed GOP staffers “lied to her” during negotiations in a backroom deal. She claimed this led her to be absent when the vote closed. She was in a national security meeting with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, where she secured a commitment to strip “Section 219” (related to protecting U.S. intellectual property and preventing bureaucrats from giving away secrets) from the final NDAA in conference. She said the vote closed “sooner than expected” before those talks wrapped up. She emphasized this isn’t the final version and she’ll get another chance to vote after conference. She reveals the the Trump White House & Pete Hegseth DO NOT want Section 219 in the bill. Section 219 was introduced in the House by Reps. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas) and Don Davis (D-N.C.) with companion legislation from Sens. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

Whiplash347

12,607 views • 1 month ago

The 2009 Israel Surveillance Deal That Still Haunts America Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸): In 2009, the Obama administration entered into an agreement with Israel that allowed the sharing of surveillance data, including information on U.S. citizens. That creates serious concerns about privacy, oversight, and what happens when illegally collected data gets passed around with little accountability. The system keeps going because FISA 702 keeps getting renewed. That reauthorization has allowed these surveillance practices to survive across multiple administrations, despite repeated warnings that Americans’ communications can be swept up without meaningful warrant protections. Now, the House has voted to pass the NDAA with Section 219 intact. If passed in the Senate and signed by Trump, this would integrate U.S. and Israeli defense technology across AI, cyber, and weapons supply chains.
3:26

The 2009 Israel Surveillance Deal That Still Haunts America Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸): In 2009, the Obama administration entered into an agreement with Israel that allowed the sharing of surveillance data, including information on U.S. citizens. That creates serious concerns about privacy, oversight, and what happens when illegally collected data gets passed around with little accountability. The system keeps going because FISA 702 keeps getting renewed. That reauthorization has allowed these surveillance practices to survive across multiple administrations, despite repeated warnings that Americans’ communications can be swept up without meaningful warrant protections. Now, the House has voted to pass the NDAA with Section 219 intact. If passed in the Senate and signed by Trump, this would integrate U.S. and Israeli defense technology across AI, cyber, and weapons supply chains.

Ben Swann

13,442 views • 1 month ago

This is: The Backstabber John Thune: “We got the House, the Senate, and the White House. We have unified control of the government. That’s a rare thing; we want to maximize it, and IT’S GOING TO TAKE EVERY FUCKING VOTE IN THE HOUSE.” Well, the House has passed the SAVE AMERICA ACT FIVE TIMES. July 10, 2024 – The House passed the original SAVE Act by a vote of 221–198 (H.R. 8281). April 10, 2025 – The House passed H.R. 22, the SAVE Act, by a vote of 220–208. February 11, 2026 – The House passed the SAVE America Act by a vote of 218–213 as an amendment to S. 1383. July 16, 2026 – The House approved merging the SAVE America Act into the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), by a vote of 214–211, advancing it again. July 23, 2026 – The House gave final passage to the NDAA with the SAVE America Act attached by a vote of 232–198. In other words, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed the SAVE America Act, S. 1383, five times—and it has been sitting on Backstabber’s desk ever since.
0:54

This is: The Backstabber John Thune: “We got the House, the Senate, and the White House. We have unified control of the government. That’s a rare thing; we want to maximize it, and IT’S GOING TO TAKE EVERY FUCKING VOTE IN THE HOUSE.” Well, the House has passed the SAVE AMERICA ACT FIVE TIMES. July 10, 2024 – The House passed the original SAVE Act by a vote of 221–198 (H.R. 8281). April 10, 2025 – The House passed H.R. 22, the SAVE Act, by a vote of 220–208. February 11, 2026 – The House passed the SAVE America Act by a vote of 218–213 as an amendment to S. 1383. July 16, 2026 – The House approved merging the SAVE America Act into the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), by a vote of 214–211, advancing it again. July 23, 2026 – The House gave final passage to the NDAA with the SAVE America Act attached by a vote of 232–198. In other words, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed the SAVE America Act, S. 1383, five times—and it has been sitting on Backstabber’s desk ever since.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

12,748 views • 29 days ago

2009 NSA DEAL TO SHARE AMERICAN DATA WITH ISRAEL In 2009, the U.S. and Israel quietly entered a deal that allowed the NSA to share raw intelligence, including data involving Americans, with Israel. The agreement placed no legally binding limits on how the Israelis could use that information. Personal communications collected from U.S. citizens could be passed along without enforceable restrictions. When government collection of American data already strains constitutional rights, handing that same information to a foreign government raises the stakes even further. Now Congress has passed NDAA Section 219, which would deepen the merger of the most sensitive elements of America’s defense and intelligence system with Israel’s. Harrison Berger (Harrison Berger) joins us to break down what this means, why it matters, and how much harder it becomes to pull apart once these systems are locked together.
3:43

2009 NSA DEAL TO SHARE AMERICAN DATA WITH ISRAEL In 2009, the U.S. and Israel quietly entered a deal that allowed the NSA to share raw intelligence, including data involving Americans, with Israel. The agreement placed no legally binding limits on how the Israelis could use that information. Personal communications collected from U.S. citizens could be passed along without enforceable restrictions. When government collection of American data already strains constitutional rights, handing that same information to a foreign government raises the stakes even further. Now Congress has passed NDAA Section 219, which would deepen the merger of the most sensitive elements of America’s defense and intelligence system with Israel’s. Harrison Berger (Harrison Berger) joins us to break down what this means, why it matters, and how much harder it becomes to pull apart once these systems are locked together.

Redacted

20,736 views • 1 month ago

Our military cannot be tied to any foreign country. Section 219 of the NDAA locks U.S. military cooperation with Israel into law—sharing intel, joint work, everything. If that nation becomes our enemy, the law forces us to keep working with them. The Constitution defines treason as giving aid and comfort to our enemies. This bill doesn’t just restrict the President; it can mandate treason. That’s not America First. That’s unconstitutional.
1:33

Our military cannot be tied to any foreign country. Section 219 of the NDAA locks U.S. military cooperation with Israel into law—sharing intel, joint work, everything. If that nation becomes our enemy, the law forces us to keep working with them. The Constitution defines treason as giving aid and comfort to our enemies. This bill doesn’t just restrict the President; it can mandate treason. That’s not America First. That’s unconstitutional.

Tom Renz

14,104 views • 29 days ago

GAETZ: “Now under our current structure, we should toggle that aid if Netanyahu is non-compliant with what is a pretty reasonable demand of President Trump’s. That toggle will not exist if the current version of the NDAA is passed…will not even be an option on the table if we fuse the Department of War…with Israel, with the IDF.” “WHY would ANY Congressperson, Republican or Democrat, believe that it is not a debasing surrender of America’s sovereignty to just CUCK OUT like this?”
0:53

GAETZ: “Now under our current structure, we should toggle that aid if Netanyahu is non-compliant with what is a pretty reasonable demand of President Trump’s. That toggle will not exist if the current version of the NDAA is passed…will not even be an option on the table if we fuse the Department of War…with Israel, with the IDF.” “WHY would ANY Congressperson, Republican or Democrat, believe that it is not a debasing surrender of America’s sovereignty to just CUCK OUT like this?”

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

67,460 views • 2 months ago