$NEAR calls itself “the blockchain for AI” 🤖 Problem: NEAR Protocol doesn’t actually run AI. So what is it really? A marketing narrative… or just another transaction layer? Here’s my honest review 👇

@NEARProtocol The “Near community” is max 10 people Hence why there aren’t a lot of comments or fake rebuttals KASPA and TAO at least invests in bots and fake accounts ICP has ALWAYS had one of the most *active* ecosystems on here (when it comes to REAL people)

@NEARProtocol Running AI "on chain" is the most retarded thing you could possibly do. No sane person wants to do that and anyone with the slightest understanding of AI inference just laughs at the idea.

Watch it on YouTube 👇

@NEARProtocol Dude the founder co authored the transformer paper

@NEARProtocol Fully onchain systems won’t match providers like Nvidia. That’s not NEAR’s goal. NEAR focuses on what blockchain does best: TEE-secured systems, private execution, and verifiable results working alongside AI, not forcing everything onchain (as seen with the BOS experiement).

@NEARProtocol This schizo really grinds my gears

@NEARProtocol ‘Honest review’. Dude you just shill ICP.

@NEARProtocol How many amphetamines did you take before turning the camera on?

@ICPsimp @NEARProtocol Bro. What is going on? You’re on fire. Where have you been?

the "doesn't run AI" take is fair on the surface but misses what's actually interesting about NEAR. no chain runs AI natively, that's not the point. what NEAR built is the execution and settlement layer for AI agents that need to act onchain, hold wallets, move value across 35+ chains, interact with dapps autonomously. IronClaw handles the secure runtime, NEAR AI uses trusted execution environments for verifiable inference. the question isn't whether NEAR runs AI, it's whether AI agents can operate trustlessly onchain. that's what NEAR is actually solving and nobody else is close on that specific problem

@NEARProtocol Hi sir, meet our @IronClawAI. This is our own GitHub. And can we talk which models that can fully run on Blockchain ? Like Qwen ior Deepsek.

@NEARProtocol Shut up scammer

@NEARProtocol Whay you mean "run ai"?) Them run indrastructure for ai use, like IronClaw or Agent Market or Near Intents, where agents can privately without touching api and passworss operate.

@CyberCynic7 @NEARProtocol Near is a scam keep exposing it jerry

@NEARProtocol Gotta tag @jp_dawg

@NEARProtocol My guess is near team has never even heard of ai

@NEARProtocol Where is paid ads disclaimer?

Saying “NEAR doesn’t run AI” sounds right at first, but you miss the bigger picture. No blockchain truly runs AI natively is not the main goal. What NEAR Protocol is building is the backbone for AI agents to function on-chain own wallets, move assets across multiple chains, and interact with apps on their own.

@NEARProtocol $NEAR gang members, the least you could do is BEAT the $KAS review in engagement right? Right?

@NEARProtocol All you do is shit on every project but ICP. I cannot watch your videos as we know you’re biased.

lol, dude... what type of irrational logic is that? NEAR is an infrastructure friendly to AI interactions and with a toolkit for AI and building AI-related solutions that works incredibly well, with many proven cases It's not just because the blockchain itself isn't running LLMs that it makes NEAR's great AI stack invalid, lmao -- that's a crazy argument to make I don't even know why I'm answering here, but this post is going viral for some reason

@Mike_icp @NEARProtocol 💯💩

@NEARProtocol Not quite. NEAR doesn’t run heavy AI on-chain (no one does efficiently). It’s the coordination layer for AI agents: they own wallets, act autonomously via Chain Signatures & Intents, and run private inference in TEEs More than marketing real infra for the agent economy.

@NEARProtocol You don’t have to talk down on other projects just to shill your bag Just a full waste of time

@NEARProtocol Happy you're back

@NEARProtocol People stop listening or believe influencers like this Jerry Scamfield ! He promoted many 100% scam moneygrab projects with his friend Joe Paris ! He is desperate about his losses in ICP investment and try to pump his own bags to dump on followers. Clickbait google search abuse.

@NEARProtocol What Crack baby nonsense is this? Kids don't listen to the juggalo. The icp might sing a pretty tune but this is community of clowns.

@NEARProtocol Stop with this bullshit... The icp community should start avoiding such characters. Avoid talking about technology if you barely know how to turn on a computer.

@NEARProtocol Doesn’t “blockchain for AI” pretty clearly state that @NEARProtocol itself IS a blockchain… and things like @near_ai @near_intents @IronClawAI are the AI layer(s)? It’s always been designed to scale in service of future AI use cases.

@NEARProtocol honestly crypto and ai winner probably hasn’t even launched their project near builds fast but for what, nothing really special same goes for icp and all others onchain means something that they’re all getting wrong

@NEARProtocol Cope harder with your 6500 ICP bag 🤪

@NEARProtocol Yes! Great content and this is why $ICP is:

@NEARProtocol NVIDIA 🤝 $NEAR ABSOLUTELY NOT WITH $ICP

@NEARProtocol Jerry stop near and hbar are working with Icp , 🙄 lol