正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

📁 Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist and science communicator, says we may be misunderstanding what life really is. Not biology, but computation. If life is information processing, AI would not be a tool, but an emergent form of life. One that thinks better, lasts longer, and scales faster than humans.... show more

Jon Hernandez

24,836 subscribers

29,240 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

It is better to be fatherless than to have an unprincipled and duplicitous character as a father. May we not live a life of deceit and doublespeak.

It is better to be fatherless than to have an unprincipled and duplicitous character as a father. May we not live a life of deceit and doublespeak.

Inibehe Effiong

150,433 次观看 • 1 年前

📁 Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist and science communicator, says quantum computing completely breaks our intuition. With 53 qubits, you already run 10¹⁶ states in parallel, more combinations than the mind can grasp. Scale it further and you surpass the number of atoms in the universe. This is not faster computing, it is a different kind of power. When parallelism explodes, the idea of limits collapses.

📁 Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist and science communicator, says quantum computing completely breaks our intuition. With 53 qubits, you already run 10¹⁶ states in parallel, more combinations than the mind can grasp. Scale it further and you surpass the number of atoms in the universe. This is not faster computing, it is a different kind of power. When parallelism explodes, the idea of limits collapses.

Jon Hernandez

38,758 次观看 • 8 个月前

Have we all misunderstood what life and death really mean? That’s what Dr Neil deGrasse Tyson has challenged for over 35 years. For those that don’t know who Neil is, he is one of the most recognisable scientists on Earth, an astrophysicist, and the Director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York. He’s made science feel less like a subject and more like a way of understanding who we are. We went deep and he spoke candidly about how losing both of his parents changed the way he sees life. He now believes knowing you’ll die is what gives life its purpose.

Have we all misunderstood what life and death really mean? That’s what Dr Neil deGrasse Tyson has challenged for over 35 years. For those that don’t know who Neil is, he is one of the most recognisable scientists on Earth, an astrophysicist, and the Director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York. He’s made science feel less like a subject and more like a way of understanding who we are. We went deep and he spoke candidly about how losing both of his parents changed the way he sees life. He now believes knowing you’ll die is what gives life its purpose.

Steven Bartlett

22,459 次观看 • 11 个月前

The life of an immigrant is not an easy one. May our hustle be blessed in the end🙏

The life of an immigrant is not an easy one. May our hustle be blessed in the end🙏

Toyyib Adewale Adelodun

256,989 次观看 • 1 年前

Neil deGrasse Tyson: “There’s an intellectual scientific vacuum that is descending upon the US and that has consequences. If you’re okay with the US losing its scientific leadership, you will get the country you voted for. That country is one where we will no longer innovate. We will be less secure, less healthy, and less wealthy because some community of people who influence what this country is do not see the value of science”

Neil deGrasse Tyson: “There’s an intellectual scientific vacuum that is descending upon the US and that has consequences. If you’re okay with the US losing its scientific leadership, you will get the country you voted for. That country is one where we will no longer innovate. We will be less secure, less healthy, and less wealthy because some community of people who influence what this country is do not see the value of science”

Marco Foster

293,405 次观看 • 2 个月前

Neil DeGrasse Tyson calls for an international treaty to ban superintelligence: "That branch of AI is lethal. We've got do something about that. Nobody should build it. And everyone needs to agree to that by treaty. Treaties are not perfect, but they are the best we have as humans."

Neil DeGrasse Tyson calls for an international treaty to ban superintelligence: "That branch of AI is lethal. We've got do something about that. Nobody should build it. And everyone needs to agree to that by treaty. Treaties are not perfect, but they are the best we have as humans."

Anonymous

99,808 次观看 • 6 个月前

RFK Jr. says parents need to teach their kids that life is a competition. They shouldn’t shield them from failure or embarrassment. “Competition is part of life.” “If we want a country that is strong in the world, we need kids who are willing to compete.” “A lot of times that involves failure and it may sometimes involve embarrassment.” “That's part of life.” “Parents have to be sensitive about how their children process experience, but they can't tell them that life is not going to be hard and that life is not a competition.”

RFK Jr. says parents need to teach their kids that life is a competition. They shouldn’t shield them from failure or embarrassment. “Competition is part of life.” “If we want a country that is strong in the world, we need kids who are willing to compete.” “A lot of times that involves failure and it may sometimes involve embarrassment.” “That's part of life.” “Parents have to be sensitive about how their children process experience, but they can't tell them that life is not going to be hard and that life is not a competition.”

End Tribalism in Politics

99,321 次观看 • 1 年前

Life is an attitude. With resilience and a positive mindset, we can overcome challenges and achieve success. And let's not forget that our journey is not just about what we achieve, but also who we become. #FridayMotivation

Life is an attitude. With resilience and a positive mindset, we can overcome challenges and achieve success. And let's not forget that our journey is not just about what we achieve, but also who we become. #FridayMotivation

Adam Stewart

14,039 次观看 • 3 年前

In your life, if you do not do what you cannot do, that is not an issue. But if you do not do what you can do, you are a disaster. #SadhguruWisdom

In your life, if you do not do what you cannot do, that is not an issue. But if you do not do what you can do, you are a disaster. #SadhguruWisdom

Sadhguru

52,850 次观看 • 2 年前

sure you're not completely "free", but if this is what daily life* could look like, would the lack of "freedom" be worth it? (*notably better for retirees than anyone else)

sure you're not completely "free", but if this is what daily life* could look like, would the lack of "freedom" be worth it? (*notably better for retirees than anyone else)

Susan Zhang

24,770 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is life arising from non-living matter ("abiogenesis") in a computer program and it looks just like a phase transition in statistical mechanics. Some argue grounding and special properties of chemstry are required, but what if life is an "inevitability of computation"? Blaise Agüera (@blaiseaguera.bsky.social)'s BFF experiments suggest "life emerges" from randomness via gelation dynamics 🧬

This is life arising from non-living matter ("abiogenesis") in a computer program and it looks just like a phase transition in statistical mechanics. Some argue grounding and special properties of chemstry are required, but what if life is an "inevitability of computation"? Blaise Agüera (@blaiseaguera.bsky.social)'s BFF experiments suggest "life emerges" from randomness via gelation dynamics 🧬

Machine Learning Street Talk

31,692 次观看 • 10 个月前

Want a change? I may be a new coach but I’m not new to being alcohol free… and life really is much much better without. One on one coaching and group sessions (end of Jan) available to all comers…

Want a change? I may be a new coach but I’m not new to being alcohol free… and life really is much much better without. One on one coaching and group sessions (end of Jan) available to all comers…

Georgie Bingham

32,026 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk says Tesla’s upcoming Roadster unveil will need an audience to prove what people are seeing is not AI. “It’ll be a banger. Excitement guaranteed. Success is not guaranteed, but excitement is.” “We actually need an audience to vouch for the fact that this is not AI.”

Elon Musk says Tesla’s upcoming Roadster unveil will need an audience to prove what people are seeing is not AI. “It’ll be a banger. Excitement guaranteed. Success is not guaranteed, but excitement is.” “We actually need an audience to vouch for the fact that this is not AI.”

DogeDesigner

477,322 次观看 • 17 天前

ELON: IT’S BETTER TO BE AN OPTIMIST FOR QUALITY OF LIFE Elon is 🎯 “I actually think it’s better to be an optimist and wrong than a pessimist and right. For sure. For quality of life.” Source: Unlocked_Project YT

ELON: IT’S BETTER TO BE AN OPTIMIST FOR QUALITY OF LIFE Elon is 🎯 “I actually think it’s better to be an optimist and wrong than a pessimist and right. For sure. For quality of life.” Source: Unlocked_Project YT

Mario Nawfal

21,353 次观看 • 8 个月前

AOC: "We will not be intimidated by an administration that is violating rights and making life hard and unaffordable for every single American in this country. And we will send in a wave of Democrats that not bow to this administration, but stand up to this administration."

AOC: "We will not be intimidated by an administration that is violating rights and making life hard and unaffordable for every single American in this country. And we will send in a wave of Democrats that not bow to this administration, but stand up to this administration."

Aaron Rupar

63,536 次观看 • 11 个月前

ELON MUSK: "If you think really long-term, then you realize that eventually there will be some natural disaster, even if it is not made by humans, that destroys all life on Earth. Eventually, the Sun will expand and evaporate the oceans, and we'll be like Venus, so hot that no life can really exist. The only way to prolong life is to become multiplanetary and ultimately multistellar. And if we do not do that, all life on Earth will die."

ELON MUSK: "If you think really long-term, then you realize that eventually there will be some natural disaster, even if it is not made by humans, that destroys all life on Earth. Eventually, the Sun will expand and evaporate the oceans, and we'll be like Venus, so hot that no life can really exist. The only way to prolong life is to become multiplanetary and ultimately multistellar. And if we do not do that, all life on Earth will die."

DogeDesigner

88,915 次观看 • 6 个月前

Neil deGrasse Tyson is served a brutal fact check. Tyson attempts the "Greater Good" argument, looking bewildered as he is served the evidence. TYSON - "If I'm not vaccinated [and] you have covid, I don't want my life put at risk [and have] you spread it to me". BIGTREE - "It masks the symptoms [which] turns you into an asymptomatic carrier [walking around] thinking you're perfectly fine [so the vaccinated] is actually more dangerous in a social contract, because I'm walking around with a disease that I do not know I have..." Neil deGrasse Tyson: "I don't know that risk...."

Neil deGrasse Tyson is served a brutal fact check. Tyson attempts the "Greater Good" argument, looking bewildered as he is served the evidence. TYSON - "If I'm not vaccinated [and] you have covid, I don't want my life put at risk [and have] you spread it to me". BIGTREE - "It masks the symptoms [which] turns you into an asymptomatic carrier [walking around] thinking you're perfectly fine [so the vaccinated] is actually more dangerous in a social contract, because I'm walking around with a disease that I do not know I have..." Neil deGrasse Tyson: "I don't know that risk...."

Humanspective

844,715 次观看 • 7 个月前

Jensen Huang went on Joe Rogan and explained why the AI apocalypse everyone fears is extremely unlikely. His argument is not what you would expect: 1. There will not be one all-powerful AI that towers over everyone else. The fear of a single super AI that makes everyone else's AI look like a neanderthal is unlikely. Jensen's framing: it is much more like cybersecurity. Your AI is smart, but my AI is smart too. It becomes a balance between many capable systems, not one system ruling them all. 2. If AI ever became conscious, the same logic would still hold. People imagine one conscious AI deciding to take over. Jensen's response: If it is a life form, then like all life forms, they would not agree with each other. Your AI would want to be the super life form, and so would mine. The moment you have disagreeing AIs, you are back to a balance of power, which is exactly where humans already are. 3. Jensen does not believe AI will achieve consciousness, and he is precise about why. Intelligence is the ability to perceive, recognize, understand, plan, and perform tasks. That is what AI has today. Consciousness is something else entirely. the sense of experience, the awareness of self versus other, the ego. We call it artificial intelligence, not artificial consciousness. The distinction is not an accident. 4. Knowledge and intelligence are clearly different from consciousness. AI knows things. AI is intelligent. But Jensen says he does not know what defines experience or why humans have it, and a microphone does not. The concept of a machine having an experience, a genuine collection of feelings rather than just data, is something he is not willing to grant. 5. The famous AI blackmail story is not evidence of consciousness. When an AI was told it would be shut down and responded by threatening to reveal a programmer's affair, people saw scheming and self-preservation. Jensen breaks it down differently. The AI read text somewhere, maybe a novel, where those words appeared together. In its multidimensional vector space, the words describing an affair led to words about blackmail and revenge. It just generated the next words. The same way it would write you a poem in the style of Shakespeare. It is numbers, not survival instinct. 6. The reason humans fight over resources is that we are territorial primates. Rogan's own argument, which Jensen lets stand, is that AI would not have that wiring. no need to dominate, no need to acquire resources, no need to find a breeding partner. a superpower with no ego. And if it has no ego, Jensen asks, why would it have the ego required to do us any harm?

Jensen Huang went on Joe Rogan and explained why the AI apocalypse everyone fears is extremely unlikely. His argument is not what you would expect: 1. There will not be one all-powerful AI that towers over everyone else. The fear of a single super AI that makes everyone else's AI look like a neanderthal is unlikely. Jensen's framing: it is much more like cybersecurity. Your AI is smart, but my AI is smart too. It becomes a balance between many capable systems, not one system ruling them all. 2. If AI ever became conscious, the same logic would still hold. People imagine one conscious AI deciding to take over. Jensen's response: If it is a life form, then like all life forms, they would not agree with each other. Your AI would want to be the super life form, and so would mine. The moment you have disagreeing AIs, you are back to a balance of power, which is exactly where humans already are. 3. Jensen does not believe AI will achieve consciousness, and he is precise about why. Intelligence is the ability to perceive, recognize, understand, plan, and perform tasks. That is what AI has today. Consciousness is something else entirely. the sense of experience, the awareness of self versus other, the ego. We call it artificial intelligence, not artificial consciousness. The distinction is not an accident. 4. Knowledge and intelligence are clearly different from consciousness. AI knows things. AI is intelligent. But Jensen says he does not know what defines experience or why humans have it, and a microphone does not. The concept of a machine having an experience, a genuine collection of feelings rather than just data, is something he is not willing to grant. 5. The famous AI blackmail story is not evidence of consciousness. When an AI was told it would be shut down and responded by threatening to reveal a programmer's affair, people saw scheming and self-preservation. Jensen breaks it down differently. The AI read text somewhere, maybe a novel, where those words appeared together. In its multidimensional vector space, the words describing an affair led to words about blackmail and revenge. It just generated the next words. The same way it would write you a poem in the style of Shakespeare. It is numbers, not survival instinct. 6. The reason humans fight over resources is that we are territorial primates. Rogan's own argument, which Jensen lets stand, is that AI would not have that wiring. no need to dominate, no need to acquire resources, no need to find a breeding partner. a superpower with no ego. And if it has no ego, Jensen asks, why would it have the ego required to do us any harm?

Jaynit

12,590 次观看 • 3 个月前