Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Neil Oliver maintains that the technocratic agenda to construct a "digital cage"—comprised of digital ID and CBDCs—is ultimately doomed to failure "without the cooperation of the people". "Despite what the technocrats would like us to think... all of it will fail." "Because the trust is gone. And you cannot...

121,034 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Mediavor 3 Monaten

Credit: @thecoastguy Full video. 👇

Profilbild von GGG
GGGvor 3 Monaten

2. But my God is Scotland beautiful! Live there for sometime until 2005 and children were born in Glasgow. But besides being beautiful, the Highlands have a mystique that defies description, it was visiting Glencoe long ago, Scotland first got it hooks into me, and I moved ASAP.

Profilbild von Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Mediavor 3 Monaten

The Highlands are one of my favourite places on Earth.

Profilbild von bettinablancotejera🇩🇴🇪🇸🇨🇺
bettinablancotejera🇩🇴🇪🇸🇨🇺vor 3 Monaten

I am very seriously thinking and even doing research to get a “dumb” car next time I change my vehicle. Let me tell you, it won’t be easy as basically ALL the new cars come with software integrated now. My car FORCES me to use google. I used to like google, but this lack of choice and the constant data harvesting creeps me out.

Profilbild von Saggezza Eterna
Saggezza Eternavor 3 Monaten

Digital ID is modern-day slavery 2.0. Down with the Satanic globalists who want to enslave humanity.

Profilbild von freedomcry
freedomcryvor 3 Monaten

#freedomcry The people say NO to #digital #IDS and digital currencies!!!

Profilbild von 𝗖𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗘 🟦
𝗖𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗘 🟦vor 3 Monaten

"Neil Oliver maintains, technocratic agenda to construct a "digital cage"—digital ID and CBDCs—is ultimately doomed to failure "without the cooperation of the people." Of course, a given ...problem is ...people ARE COOPERATING. So, what's the point of Mr. Olivers' statement?

Profilbild von mungo's mouthpiece
mungo's mouthpiecevor 3 Monaten

Neil forgets that most people will acquiesce to anything the govt says, as long as they don't have to apply critical thought.

Profilbild von Hugh Greene
Hugh Greenevor 3 Monaten

The trust evaporated in 2020 or earlier for some) and given the progress of AI and quantum computing NO central computer system will be safe. The CDBC and ID systems, if implemented, will be hacked within minutes.

Profilbild von Nicky MCCann
Nicky MCCannvor 3 Monaten

In this instance, we DO have the power, Digital ID/CBDC needs mass cooperation to succeed - as Blair discovered in his failed bid to introduce it. DO NOT COMPLY.

Profilbild von 🇨🇦Searán
🇨🇦Searánvor 3 Monaten

A refreshing take. Grateful for Oliver and everyone else who speaks up and helps educate others on whats happening

Profilbild von Marin Political Alliance
Marin Political Alliancevor 3 Monaten

You don't need 51% against it. Imagine 1% of 300 million Americans actively resisting, using cash in small businesses, "Want my spending? Better hire locals who speak English first" etc, corrupting, changing personal data, tea partying Flocks, meters etc.

Profilbild von RBBL-ROUZR 🕊 🇳🇴 🇳🇱
RBBL-ROUZR 🕊 🇳🇴 🇳🇱vor 3 Monaten

he is correct but there is 1 risk. If a generation is raised without knowing the Old World they will accept what is here as normal. Therefore erasing the history and this owning the future. Do we have any examples of government(s), NGO's and influencers erasing, changing, bending historical facts and happenings and media? Like changing book content or changing movie scenes well after their publication? Or a government that paints a whole different picture of a historical event as opposed to the truth and what actually happened? Do we have examples of government using CGI to create an event which is false, a false flag, which then become by nature a historical fact? As you probably already see there are thousand of examples. If they change the past, they own the future. If they can present the present as a simulation or fake presentation, its even easier. go to your local middle school and grab a history book. 99.9% is total lies @WTAFRich

Profilbild von Stuff Happens
Stuff Happensvor 3 Monaten

They learned a lot about manipulating people into cooperation from their pandemic scheme. After what I’ve seen I am not hopeful that enough people will resist compliance. I hope I’m wrong.

Profilbild von MET
METvor 3 Monaten

That's around 60-65% of population. Not kids, not pensioners-without mobiles-just the majority. Birmingham Council dropped LEZ-cos 80% refused to pay! UNITY! THAT's HOW WE FIGHT IT; simple do-not-comply!!!!!

Profilbild von Jos
Josvor 3 Monaten

They aren't really forcing a dystopian future on us. We are actively voting for it. No one i know believes there's even a problem. They all pay for everything digitally. They believe the climate shite. They all took the jab. No one is waking up. But I hope Neil's right.

Profilbild von Malc B
Malc Bvor 3 Monaten

🤞🏻but the sheeple will follow whatever the inept governments want them to do

Profilbild von True Oracle Tarot
True Oracle Tarotvor 3 Monaten

They are going to try to beat us into submission watch you'll see.... Some will fight others will submit. It's ruff times ahead.

Profilbild von 🇬🇧🇬🇧Ben Jones🇬🇧🇬🇧
🇬🇧🇬🇧Ben Jones🇬🇧🇬🇧vor 3 Monaten

Yeah but this is the vast calibre of the British people.

Profilbild von book6292
book6292vor 3 Monaten

they just need to cancel the cash money and we will be digital prisoners . and then they will exploit our dependence on our mobiles . in the process of digitization We are becoming numbers. This will make it easier for authorities and governments to control us. ║▌║▌║

Profilbild von Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD
Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MDvor 3 Monaten

I hope he's right, but I always hear those words from the Book of Revelation in the back of my mind when I think of CBDC and digital ID chips. "a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." And I'm not even a fundamentalist.

Profilbild von Toodle-oo
Toodle-oovor 3 Monaten

Oh contraire !! The Globalists will slowly, conveniently, and gently herd the masses into the digital cage When we are fat and comfortable, the digital leash will be gently slipped around our necks In the end, we will ALL have our personal AI-Nanny monitoring our every move

Profilbild von GGG
GGGvor 3 Monaten

1. Trust is absolutely zero. But to date despite the unrest, everyone is milling about like bubbles in a boiling pan, but no direction at least as of yet.

Profilbild von Alex🌺| Life Coach and Ethical Philosopher
Alex🌺| Life Coach and Ethical Philosophervor 3 Monaten

🧬The plan is for humanity 2.0 to be OWNED and OPERATED

Profilbild von Ehhhhhh
Ehhhhhhvor 3 Monaten

Once they have you trapped in a digital concentration camp then the genocide really begins

Profilbild von CATholic DOGma Rescue & Retvrn
CATholic DOGma Rescue & Retvrnvor 3 Monaten

@bjornfri2020 The technocrats also haven’t realized that most of us have reached peak fatigue and won’t be having any more of their Bond villain schemes

Profilbild von MR God Daughter of the Marquess of Salisbury
MR God Daughter of the Marquess of Salisburyvor 3 Monaten

@DarrenPlymouth Hence a kinetic war is being pushed by all sides. They all agreed to this. The ones paying the price will be the public. Those pushing it will stay safe.

Profilbild von Anfa 8
Anfa 8vor 3 Monaten

By 2033, everyone will have to ration water. And after that, they will try to block the Sun because of "Global Warming" and you will have to pay to get some Sunshine, for they are the "Followers of Saturn":

Profilbild von Kryten602
Kryten602vor 3 Monaten

Quite Prof. Neil. I genuinely think we are fucked, no matter how many people are aware. But that is some beautiful track. Been there when it was pissing down, but still an experience in beautiful Scotland.

Profilbild von Andrea Sutton
Andrea Suttonvor 3 Monaten

fabulous landscape

Profilbild von Jimmy
Jimmyvor 3 Monaten

Most people, especially women, within metropolitan cities, will comply

Profilbild von Void2Matter
Void2Mattervor 3 Monaten

I want to believe that "digital ID and CBDCs—is ultimately doomed to failure "without the cooperation of the people". But...we saw how 81% of US population took the jab, in spite of all the questions/contradictory safety & efficacy evidence. Not promising we'll resist in future.

Profilbild von 1bit
1bitvor 3 Monaten

Some Apps are now even prepping for it’s introduction. My Missus was on the Shein App early today looking for Sexy Lingerie, and this Check Popped up.

Profilbild von Jarl Jensen
Jarl Jensenvor 3 Monaten

It seems like the coming of “skynet” will not be controlled by AI but by the same assoles that have been killing us for the last 2000 years.

Ähnliche Videos

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten