Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Neil Oliver maintains that the technocratic agenda to construct a "digital cage"—comprised of digital ID and CBDCs—is ultimately doomed to failure "without the cooperation of the people". "Despite what the technocrats would like us to think... all of it will fail." "Because the trust is gone. And you cannot... show more

Wide Awake Media

841,488 subscribers

120,684 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID will never work as advertised, not only because keeping us safe is not... its intended function, but also... because too many people have learned that fundamental lesson of the last few years, which is to say it's never about what they say it's about." "Digital ID isn't about keeping us safe. It's about keeping us where they can see us. Where we can't move or do anything without permission in advance. Too many people see and understand, and this is why it won't work." "Too many have seen and understood that the motive behind the deliberate and cynical flooding of Britain, and of Europe, with people from outside... is designed primarily to create fear and division—fear and division that, as the oligarchs would have it, can only be fixed by digital ID for all." "Digital ID... won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe—safe from us." "Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be about making this country and the people living in it safe. But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place, and for this people." Credit: Neil Oliver

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID will never work as advertised, not only because keeping us safe is not... its intended function, but also... because too many people have learned that fundamental lesson of the last few years, which is to say it's never about what they say it's about." "Digital ID isn't about keeping us safe. It's about keeping us where they can see us. Where we can't move or do anything without permission in advance. Too many people see and understand, and this is why it won't work." "Too many have seen and understood that the motive behind the deliberate and cynical flooding of Britain, and of Europe, with people from outside... is designed primarily to create fear and division—fear and division that, as the oligarchs would have it, can only be fixed by digital ID for all." "Digital ID... won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe—safe from us." "Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be about making this country and the people living in it safe. But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place, and for this people." Credit: Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

48,382 views • 10 months ago

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID has got nothing to do with stopping new people arriving... It's all about taking control of the people." "Digital ID... might be seen as the key that locks the digital cage. If they can get everyone to take a digital ID, then the door clicks shut for all time." "But oddly, ever since Keir Starmer stood up and said... that you won't be able to work in Britain, or do anything else, unless you have a Digital ID... I thought, no, it's going to be all right. This is not going to work. This is a step too far." "I firmly believe that so many people, unlike what happened at the advent of the Covid debacle... will refuse to comply with this, and it will be a block of people that's too many." "And those people will find... other ways to transact with one another, to relate to one another, to share ideas, to share skills, to find food, to find all the things that people need." "I think this is the opening of the door, not the closing." Credit: Neil Oliver Gareth Icke Ickonic

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID has got nothing to do with stopping new people arriving... It's all about taking control of the people." "Digital ID... might be seen as the key that locks the digital cage. If they can get everyone to take a digital ID, then the door clicks shut for all time." "But oddly, ever since Keir Starmer stood up and said... that you won't be able to work in Britain, or do anything else, unless you have a Digital ID... I thought, no, it's going to be all right. This is not going to work. This is a step too far." "I firmly believe that so many people, unlike what happened at the advent of the Covid debacle... will refuse to comply with this, and it will be a block of people that's too many." "And those people will find... other ways to transact with one another, to relate to one another, to share ideas, to share skills, to find food, to find all the things that people need." "I think this is the opening of the door, not the closing." Credit: Neil Oliver Gareth Icke Ickonic

Wide Awake Media

26,423 views • 10 months ago

Neil Oliver: "And so, back, one last time, to digital ID and why I say it won't work. It won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe, safe from us. It won't work because in the end, as always, it's only about money, money taken from us the many and seized by them the few." "It won't work because, on account of their hubris, the oligarchs have actually revealed to us what they're all about. Bad actors, bad scripts, bad special effects, disastrous production values all round. Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be able to make this country and the people living in it safe." "But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place and for this people. Too many see that those who loathe us and our ancient homeland, those who would replace it and us with something without meaning, just a stepping stone to money and control, those that are committed to a new world order in which the mass of us are nothing more than captive slaves, captive to an anti-human ideology. Too many people see it." "Digital ID was supposed to be their grand finale, the big finish, but it's never about what they say it's about. Bad actors, the lot of them, acting in bad faith and with malice in mind. I'm telling you now, on account of all I've just said, digital ID, it won't work."

Neil Oliver: "And so, back, one last time, to digital ID and why I say it won't work. It won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe, safe from us. It won't work because in the end, as always, it's only about money, money taken from us the many and seized by them the few." "It won't work because, on account of their hubris, the oligarchs have actually revealed to us what they're all about. Bad actors, bad scripts, bad special effects, disastrous production values all round. Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be able to make this country and the people living in it safe." "But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place and for this people. Too many see that those who loathe us and our ancient homeland, those who would replace it and us with something without meaning, just a stepping stone to money and control, those that are committed to a new world order in which the mass of us are nothing more than captive slaves, captive to an anti-human ideology. Too many people see it." "Digital ID was supposed to be their grand finale, the big finish, but it's never about what they say it's about. Bad actors, the lot of them, acting in bad faith and with malice in mind. I'm telling you now, on account of all I've just said, digital ID, it won't work."

Camus

204,433 views • 10 months ago

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb: If people do not comply with digital ID, it will fail. "It is the cornerstone of the entire UN Agenda 2030. Without it, the programmable, surveillable money won't work... What they want to do in the online virtual world will not work. So much of it will not work if we do not comply with digital ID." "If you want to change the direction the world is going, you need to figure out how you are going to set up your life so you don't have to comply with digital ID." "If you were forced to comply with vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, how will you get around those type of restrictions when they try and impose digital ID on people for various reasons?" "I think it's very important for people to realise that they have the power. Otherwise, they wouldn't be investing all this money to manipulate us and pitch us on this." "We don't need this biometric digital ID surveillance state that's going to be used not just to surveil what we're doing in real time, but also to predict what we might do in the future." "That is the world they're setting up. It is very bad, and we should opt out. And we can opt out." Credit: Whitney Webb Neil Oliver

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb: If people do not comply with digital ID, it will fail. "It is the cornerstone of the entire UN Agenda 2030. Without it, the programmable, surveillable money won't work... What they want to do in the online virtual world will not work. So much of it will not work if we do not comply with digital ID." "If you want to change the direction the world is going, you need to figure out how you are going to set up your life so you don't have to comply with digital ID." "If you were forced to comply with vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, how will you get around those type of restrictions when they try and impose digital ID on people for various reasons?" "I think it's very important for people to realise that they have the power. Otherwise, they wouldn't be investing all this money to manipulate us and pitch us on this." "We don't need this biometric digital ID surveillance state that's going to be used not just to surveil what we're doing in real time, but also to predict what we might do in the future." "That is the world they're setting up. It is very bad, and we should opt out. And we can opt out." Credit: Whitney Webb Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

687,365 views • 10 months ago

According to investigative journalist Whitney Webb: "One of the main reasons for this coordinated global push to develop digital IDs is because it's deemed essential to... Agenda 2030." "Digital IDs are not really a separate project from CBDCs... CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together. And without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist." "They have to know who you are. And so they want to have your wallet tied to a digital ID, and have that digital ID be mapped to your physical ID through the biometric data collection." "If you don't participate in digital ID, you won't have a legally recognised identity, you won't have rights, you won't be able to access services without it." Credit: Whitney Webb James Patrick

According to investigative journalist Whitney Webb: "One of the main reasons for this coordinated global push to develop digital IDs is because it's deemed essential to... Agenda 2030." "Digital IDs are not really a separate project from CBDCs... CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together. And without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist." "They have to know who you are. And so they want to have your wallet tied to a digital ID, and have that digital ID be mapped to your physical ID through the biometric data collection." "If you don't participate in digital ID, you won't have a legally recognised identity, you won't have rights, you won't be able to access services without it." Credit: Whitney Webb James Patrick

Wide Awake Media

125,627 views • 4 months ago

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb: Despite being essential to the success of UN Agenda 2030, digital ID "will fail if people decline to use it". "The goal is to have it be the way for you to offer your credentials to every service that you access." "Everything ranging from healthcare to telecommunications, your social media accounts... perhaps even your appliances." "If people want to fight against... these efforts to usher us into a very dark... technocratic future, the most important thing is to not comply with digital ID." "It's the single most important piece of infrastructure that they need, and they need us to voluntarily consent... It will fail if people decline to use it." Credit: Whitney Webb Glenn Beck

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb: Despite being essential to the success of UN Agenda 2030, digital ID "will fail if people decline to use it". "The goal is to have it be the way for you to offer your credentials to every service that you access." "Everything ranging from healthcare to telecommunications, your social media accounts... perhaps even your appliances." "If people want to fight against... these efforts to usher us into a very dark... technocratic future, the most important thing is to not comply with digital ID." "It's the single most important piece of infrastructure that they need, and they need us to voluntarily consent... It will fail if people decline to use it." Credit: Whitney Webb Glenn Beck

Wide Awake Media

40,075 views • 10 months ago

"One of the main reasons for this coordinated global push to develop digital IDs is because it's deemed essential to... Agenda 2030." Journalist Whitney Webb exposes the lockstep globalist push to roll out digital ID and CBDCs. "Digital IDs are not really a separate project from CBDCs... CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together. And without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist." "They have to know who you are. And so they want to have your wallet tied to a digital ID, and have that digital ID be mapped to your physical ID through the biometric data collection." "If you don't participate in digital ID, you won't have a legally recognised identity, you won't have rights, you won't be able to access services without it." "The system itself is inherently exclusionary, and has been used to track and surveil people, to link people to essentially all their activities, what they say online." "What happened with the vaccine passport was to link your identity to your travel... And if you didn't have one, you were excluded from entering certain places." "So that, again, highlights the idea of how these digital IDs are inherently exclusionary, because if you don't have one... and if you don't abide by these various stipulations, you're excluded from participating." Credit: Whitney Webb James Patrick

"One of the main reasons for this coordinated global push to develop digital IDs is because it's deemed essential to... Agenda 2030." Journalist Whitney Webb exposes the lockstep globalist push to roll out digital ID and CBDCs. "Digital IDs are not really a separate project from CBDCs... CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together. And without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist." "They have to know who you are. And so they want to have your wallet tied to a digital ID, and have that digital ID be mapped to your physical ID through the biometric data collection." "If you don't participate in digital ID, you won't have a legally recognised identity, you won't have rights, you won't be able to access services without it." "The system itself is inherently exclusionary, and has been used to track and surveil people, to link people to essentially all their activities, what they say online." "What happened with the vaccine passport was to link your identity to your travel... And if you didn't have one, you were excluded from entering certain places." "So that, again, highlights the idea of how these digital IDs are inherently exclusionary, because if you don't have one... and if you don't abide by these various stipulations, you're excluded from participating." Credit: Whitney Webb James Patrick

Wide Awake Media

491,311 views • 10 months ago

#Bitcoin is Digital Property. It is superior to other investments such as Gold, Equity, or Real Estate because it is digital, available, global, ethical, & useful to millions of companies and billions of people.

#Bitcoin is Digital Property. It is superior to other investments such as Gold, Equity, or Real Estate because it is digital, available, global, ethical, & useful to millions of companies and billions of people.

Michael Saylor

1,126,201 views • 2 years ago

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 views • 2 months ago

Neil Oliver warns that under-16 social media bans are merely a smokescreen for digital ID mandates, disguised as child protection measures. He maintains that the real goal of these policies is suppression of dissent, which he predicts will ultimately fail.

Neil Oliver warns that under-16 social media bans are merely a smokescreen for digital ID mandates, disguised as child protection measures. He maintains that the real goal of these policies is suppression of dissent, which he predicts will ultimately fail.

Wide Awake Media

25,851 views • 1 month ago

Neil Oliver on the UK government's imminent attempt to impose mandatory digital ID: "There's going to be mass refusal, mass non-compliance... It's going to be a disaster for them, and will probably... be what brings them down." "Anybody that accepts a digital ID is slapping handcuffs around their own wrists." "It's the end of freedom. It's the end of choice. It's the worst possible decision that any... freedom loving person could possibly make." "I was pessimistic about it for a while—I'm not anymore. We've got them on this. We have them surrounded. Their arguments don't stack up. None of the reasons that they've put forward for doing this make any kind of sense." "The very idea that this is going to tackle the people arriving by boats... is absolute nonsense. It was never supposed to do that." "The desire to bring forward the digital ID was there years ago. And it was understood... that the British people would not accept it. So problems had to be fomented to make people desperate to accept this as a solution." "Hence the opening up of the borders, and the mass immigration onto these shores." "The hope has been that people would accept the digital ID as this solution to the problem. But it's entirely bogus." "All people have to do is not comply and this thing falls flat on its face. And I am convinced that that is what's going to happen." Credit: Neil Oliver Bev Turner

Neil Oliver on the UK government's imminent attempt to impose mandatory digital ID: "There's going to be mass refusal, mass non-compliance... It's going to be a disaster for them, and will probably... be what brings them down." "Anybody that accepts a digital ID is slapping handcuffs around their own wrists." "It's the end of freedom. It's the end of choice. It's the worst possible decision that any... freedom loving person could possibly make." "I was pessimistic about it for a while—I'm not anymore. We've got them on this. We have them surrounded. Their arguments don't stack up. None of the reasons that they've put forward for doing this make any kind of sense." "The very idea that this is going to tackle the people arriving by boats... is absolute nonsense. It was never supposed to do that." "The desire to bring forward the digital ID was there years ago. And it was understood... that the British people would not accept it. So problems had to be fomented to make people desperate to accept this as a solution." "Hence the opening up of the borders, and the mass immigration onto these shores." "The hope has been that people would accept the digital ID as this solution to the problem. But it's entirely bogus." "All people have to do is not comply and this thing falls flat on its face. And I am convinced that that is what's going to happen." Credit: Neil Oliver Bev Turner

Wide Awake Media

789,796 views • 10 months ago

“So when you first hear the words Digital ID, what’s your initial reaction?” We went out to ask the Public on the street what they think about Digital ID. Here’s a mix of what they said; ‘The vulnerabilities of Digital ID and how it can be abused. I’m not a fan of it, but I feel like, to a certain extent, it kind of already exists. Instrumental thing of authoritarianism, of the government using it against you in certain ways. I myself do not agree with a digital ID. It’s become, well, instrumental to a technocratic society. Then we asked them if they would sign The Together Pledge: ‘ I solemnly and publicly promise that I will not install government code on my phone.’ #scrapdogitalid Ellie Hodges

“So when you first hear the words Digital ID, what’s your initial reaction?” We went out to ask the Public on the street what they think about Digital ID. Here’s a mix of what they said; ‘The vulnerabilities of Digital ID and how it can be abused. I’m not a fan of it, but I feel like, to a certain extent, it kind of already exists. Instrumental thing of authoritarianism, of the government using it against you in certain ways. I myself do not agree with a digital ID. It’s become, well, instrumental to a technocratic society. Then we asked them if they would sign The Together Pledge: ‘ I solemnly and publicly promise that I will not install government code on my phone.’ #scrapdogitalid Ellie Hodges

Alan D Miller

11,632 views • 3 months ago

"The idea Digital ID will stop illegal immigration or fraud or crime is preposterous "What it will do is surveil us all much more - that's why Together has a campaign for a Digital Bill of Rights" NO to Digital ID YES to Digital Bill of Rights Michelle Dewberry GB News

"The idea Digital ID will stop illegal immigration or fraud or crime is preposterous "What it will do is surveil us all much more - that's why Together has a campaign for a Digital Bill of Rights" NO to Digital ID YES to Digital Bill of Rights Michelle Dewberry GB News

Alan D Miller

37,265 views • 1 year ago

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb says that the synchronised global effort to roll out digital ID is driven by its critical role in implementing Agenda 2030. "CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together... Without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist." "They have to know who you are. And so they want to have your wallet tied to a digital ID, and have that digital ID be mapped to your physical ID through the biometric data collection." "If you don't participate in digital ID, you won't have a legally recognised identity, you won't have rights, you won't be able to access services without it." Credit: Whitney Webb James Patrick

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb says that the synchronised global effort to roll out digital ID is driven by its critical role in implementing Agenda 2030. "CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together... Without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist." "They have to know who you are. And so they want to have your wallet tied to a digital ID, and have that digital ID be mapped to your physical ID through the biometric data collection." "If you don't participate in digital ID, you won't have a legally recognised identity, you won't have rights, you won't be able to access services without it." Credit: Whitney Webb James Patrick

Wide Awake Media

168,400 views • 3 months ago

DIGITAL ID: "It won't work!" - Neil Oliver The rise of biometric surveillance and the push for Digital ID are direct threats to our privacy, freedom, and dignity. Every surveillance system begins with “nothing to worry about.” But it never ends there – if we don’t draw the line now, where does it stop?

DIGITAL ID: "It won't work!" - Neil Oliver The rise of biometric surveillance and the push for Digital ID are direct threats to our privacy, freedom, and dignity. Every surveillance system begins with “nothing to worry about.” But it never ends there – if we don’t draw the line now, where does it stop?

Together

40,942 views • 1 year ago

"They're running out of time because more people are waking up." German MEP Christine Anderson: The rushed agenda to roll out 15 minute cities, digital ID and CBDCs is a desperate attempt to "erect a totalitarian surveillance state" before too many people wake up. "What they don't get, though, is people are waking up because they're ramping it up." "The window is kind of closing, because the critical voices are becoming more and they're becoming louder. So that's why they're ramping things up." "Digital identity [is] not so your life is easier. It's so government has total control over you." "Digital currency [is] the crème de la crème of all control mechanisms... What do you think is going to happen the next time you refuse to take an mRNA shot? With the flip of a switch, they just cancel your account. You cannot buy food anymore. You cannot do anything anymore." Credit: Christine Anderson

"They're running out of time because more people are waking up." German MEP Christine Anderson: The rushed agenda to roll out 15 minute cities, digital ID and CBDCs is a desperate attempt to "erect a totalitarian surveillance state" before too many people wake up. "What they don't get, though, is people are waking up because they're ramping it up." "The window is kind of closing, because the critical voices are becoming more and they're becoming louder. So that's why they're ramping things up." "Digital identity [is] not so your life is easier. It's so government has total control over you." "Digital currency [is] the crème de la crème of all control mechanisms... What do you think is going to happen the next time you refuse to take an mRNA shot? With the flip of a switch, they just cancel your account. You cannot buy food anymore. You cannot do anything anymore." Credit: Christine Anderson

Wide Awake Media

554,984 views • 1 year ago

DIGITAL ID: "It won't work!" - Neil Oliver The rise of biometric surveillance and the push for Digital ID are direct threats to our privacy, freedom, and dignity. Every surveillance system begins with “nothing to worry about.” But it never ends there – if we don’t draw the line now, where does it stop?

DIGITAL ID: "It won't work!" - Neil Oliver The rise of biometric surveillance and the push for Digital ID are direct threats to our privacy, freedom, and dignity. Every surveillance system begins with “nothing to worry about.” But it never ends there – if we don’t draw the line now, where does it stop?

Together

50,536 views • 11 months ago

Australian senator Alex Antic warns that the roll-out of smart city technologies—including facial recognition cameras, social credit systems, CBDCs and digital ID—is laying the foundation for a "dystopian digital future". "Your streets are spying on you, your mobile phone is spying on you, your cities are spying on you, and the infrastructure for future lockdowns is being put into place right now." "You're being set up to be tracked through your movements, and through the future of your digital wallets. By handing over your data, you're handing over the ability to monitor your behaviour, which will soon be turned into a social credit score." "And once the central bank digital currencies are in place, you won't get to spend your money without approval." "Eventually, you won't be able to access any government or public services, and you won't be able to travel across borders or access healthcare or the internet without a digital ID." "You think you won't comply? I think you will."

Australian senator Alex Antic warns that the roll-out of smart city technologies—including facial recognition cameras, social credit systems, CBDCs and digital ID—is laying the foundation for a "dystopian digital future". "Your streets are spying on you, your mobile phone is spying on you, your cities are spying on you, and the infrastructure for future lockdowns is being put into place right now." "You're being set up to be tracked through your movements, and through the future of your digital wallets. By handing over your data, you're handing over the ability to monitor your behaviour, which will soon be turned into a social credit score." "And once the central bank digital currencies are in place, you won't get to spend your money without approval." "Eventually, you won't be able to access any government or public services, and you won't be able to travel across borders or access healthcare or the internet without a digital ID." "You think you won't comply? I think you will."

Wide Awake Media

102,477 views • 1 year ago

Neil Oliver issues a stark warning: the era of Digital ID is the ultimate bait and switch, and we are sleepwalking into a future of zero trust. The bait is the irresistible carrot of convenience and promises of safety. The switch is a total-surveillance state modeled on the Chinese system. This isn't a theory; "Zero Trust" is the official framework—meaning every citizen is considered a criminal until proven innocent by forfeiting their private data. Your digital ID will be the key to your entire life: to shop, to bank, to even open your own computer. Without it, you are in a digital jail. This system will then be fused with your carbon footprint and social credit score, all connected to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Imagine a world where an AI denies you fuel for your car because you've exceeded your monthly CO₂ quota. Where you are blocked from buying steak or a plane ticket because an algorithm disapproves of your consumption or your past online statements. This is the endgame. We are transitioning from being slaves to debt to becoming digital slaves, our every move subject to the permission of a watchful state. Once the digital ID is in place, the trap is sprung forever.

Neil Oliver issues a stark warning: the era of Digital ID is the ultimate bait and switch, and we are sleepwalking into a future of zero trust. The bait is the irresistible carrot of convenience and promises of safety. The switch is a total-surveillance state modeled on the Chinese system. This isn't a theory; "Zero Trust" is the official framework—meaning every citizen is considered a criminal until proven innocent by forfeiting their private data. Your digital ID will be the key to your entire life: to shop, to bank, to even open your own computer. Without it, you are in a digital jail. This system will then be fused with your carbon footprint and social credit score, all connected to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Imagine a world where an AI denies you fuel for your car because you've exceeded your monthly CO₂ quota. Where you are blocked from buying steak or a plane ticket because an algorithm disapproves of your consumption or your past online statements. This is the endgame. We are transitioning from being slaves to debt to becoming digital slaves, our every move subject to the permission of a watchful state. Once the digital ID is in place, the trap is sprung forever.

Camus

111,565 views • 10 months ago