正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨🇮🇷🇮🇱 NETANYAHU IN PANIC: This Iran’s Missile Leaves No Margin for Error Iran’s Haj Qasem ballistic missile belongs to a newer class of systems designed for faster launch and improved operational flexibility. With a range of about 1,400 km, Haj Qasem can reach targets across much of the Middle...

161,527 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 US TREMBLES: This Iranian Missile Can Wipe Out Any American Base in the Middle East Iran unveiled the Fattah missile in June 2023 as a new addition to its solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile arsenal. It has a range of approximately 1,400 km, placing Israel, US bases in the Persian Gulf, and much of the Middle East within reach from Iranian territory. 🔸 Fattah uses solid propellant, allowing it to remain fueled and launch-ready for extended periods. This eliminates the lengthy fueling process required by older liquid-fuel missiles and improves survivability by enabling mobile deployment on transporter-erector-launchers. 🔸 The missile features a maneuverable reentry vehicle mounted on a conical warhead section with small control surfaces. This allows trajectory adjustments during the terminal phase of flight. Unlike traditional ballistic warheads that follow a predictable descent path, maneuvering reentry vehicles can alter direction, reducing interception probability and shortening reaction time for missile defense systems. 🔸 Fattah uses composite materials to reduce structural weight while maintaining strength. This improves range efficiency and allows the missile to carry a warhead estimated at around 450–500 kg. 🔸 The system is part of a broader modernization effort that includes missiles such as Haj Qasem and Kheibar Shekan, all built around solid fuel, mobile launch capability, and maneuverable warheads. These systems are designed for rapid deployment, reduced launch preparation time, and greater operational flexibility. Fattah shows Iran’s continued focus on survivable medium-range strike systems capable of operating from mobile platforms and reaching targets across the region. Trump has been shipping massive amounts of military cargo to the Middle East lately ahead of a possible strike on Iran. Did he manage to send enough body bags for American cannon fodder in case of an Iranian Fatah retaliatory strike?

NewRulesGeopolitics

16,391 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇮🇷 Iran’s Ballistic Missile Arsenal and the Regional Counter Strategy Fateh Series (SRBM) The Fateh family represents Iran’s core short range ballistic missile capability. These missiles use solid fuel, allowing rapid launch with minimal preparation time. Estimated range is around 300 km, designed for battlefield and regional targets. Later variants emphasize higher accuracy through improved guidance and terminal maneuvering, making them more difficult to intercept than older systems. Sejjil (MRBM) Sejjil is a two stage, solid fuel medium range ballistic missile with an estimated range of 2,000 to 2,500 km. Its solid fuel design significantly improves survivability by reducing launch detection time. Sejjil is intended as a strategic missile capable of reaching targets across the Middle East, including major military bases and infrastructure. Kheibar Shekan (Advanced MRBM) Kheibar Shekan is a newer generation solid fuel missile with a reported range of around 1,450 km. It features a maneuverable reentry vehicle, enabling mid course and terminal phase adjustments to complicate interception. This missile is optimized to penetrate modern missile defense systems rather than relying purely on range or payload. Why these missiles challenge air and missile defenses? Solid fuel propulsion shortens warning time. Maneuverable reentry vehicles reduce interception probability. High speed terminal phases compress response windows. When launched in salvos, these missiles are designed to stress and saturate defensive systems. How regional and allied forces aim to counter this threat Surrounding states and allied bases rely on layered missile defense. Patriot PAC 3 MSE addresses short range and terminal phase threats. THAAD provides high altitude interception against medium range missiles. Israeli systems such as Arrow complement regional coverage. Early warning radars, space based sensors, and shared command networks extend detection and response time. Base hardening, dispersal of assets, and redundancy reduce damage if interception fails. Intelligence driven preemptive strike capability remains a key deterrent factor. Strategic assessment Iran’s missile program emphasizes survivability and defense penetration rather than sheer numbers. In response, regional allies focus on integration, layered defense, and intelligence dominance. The outcome in any future conflict would likely depend less on individual missiles and more on coordination, saturation levels, and decision speed.. Can layered missile defense realistically stay ahead of evolving maneuverable ballistic threats?

Defense Intelligence

22,048 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨TRUMP IN PANIC: Here's Iran’s DEADLIEST Missile The Fattah-2 missile introduces a totally new concept: instead of relying solely on a ballistic reentry vehicle, it uses a hypersonic glide vehicle designed to manoeuvre during the final phase of flight. This glide vehicle separates after the booster phase and continues toward its target while remaining inside the atmosphere. Unlike traditional ballistic warheads, which follow a largely predictable descent, a glide vehicle can adjust its path, making tracking and interception more difficult, especially for systems optimised to counter classic ballistic trajectories. The missile has a range of around 1,400 kilometres, placing it within the same general category as several other medium-range systems in Iran’s arsenal. The key difference lies in the vehicle’s flight behaviour rather than its distance. The ability to manoeuvre at hypersonic speed requires precise guidance, heat-resistant materials, and stable control under extreme aerodynamic stress. The development of systems like Fattah-2 reflects a long-term trend in Iran’s missile programme. Over the past two decades, Iranian engineers have steadily improved propulsion, accuracy, and survivability. Much of this work has taken place domestically, under sanctions and technological isolation, which has helped the country to develop internal research and production. If Israel and its NATO allies struggled with Iran’s previous retaliatory strike, how prepared are they for a larger one given Iran’s recent military advances?

NewRulesGeopolitics

45,957 次观看 • 5 个月前

Sejjil is the Message Today, Iran launched a Sejjil missile - its solid-fueled, medium-range ballistic system that has seen relatively few operational appearances since its initial test in 2008. Reports from Israeli and regional sources claim the missile was intercepted, but with no visual confirmation and media coverage tightly controlled by Israeli authorities, the actual outcome remains unclear. The Sejjil is a two-stage, road-mobile ballistic missile with an estimated range of 2,000 to 2,500 kilometers. Its use of solid fuel marks a significant operational advantage: shorter preparation time, faster launch capability, and greater survivability compared to liquid-fueled systems. This allows for more rapid deployment and less vulnerability to preemptive strikes, enhancing Iran’s ability to respond flexibly in a conflict scenario. While recent public focus has been on the Khorramshahr-class missiles, especially with the development of Khorramshahr-4 (Kheibar), the Sejjil offers a different set of advantages. Although it carries a lighter warhead, it is more launch-ready due to its solid propulsion. This makes it more suited for time-sensitive missions and rapid response strategies. Today’s reported launch reinforces the message that Iran is maintaining and gradually modernizing a diverse missile arsenal. The event also highlights the limits of open-source verification in environments where the flow of information is tightly managed. Whether or not the missile was successfully intercepted, the launch itself is a reminder of Iran’s continued emphasis on building operationally credible deterrent capabilities across its missile forces.

Zlatti71

24,790 次观看 • 1 年前

Iran named a missile after the man America killed. And it's now flying at American bases. Meet the HAJ QASEM. Named after IRGC General Qasem Soleimani — assassinated by a U.S. drone strike in January 2020. The most powerful Iranian military commander in a generation. His death radicalized an ENTIRE generation of IRGC officers. 5 years later, the missile carrying his name is hitting targets across the Middle East. 💀 500 kg high-explosive warhead 💀 Range: 1,400 km — hits Israel, every U.S. base in the Gulf, all of Saudi Arabia 💀 SOLID FUEL — launches in minutes with zero warning 💀 Liquid-fueled missiles need hours of visible fueling — satellites detect them 💀 Solid-fueled? By the time you see it, it's already in the air 💀 Precision-guided — Iran's MOST accurate ballistic missile ⚠️ This is the missile Iran upgraded to AFTER studying 10 days of U.S. air defenses ⚠️ Solid fuel = no fueling trucks = no satellite warning = no preemptive strike ⚠️ 1,400 km range = launched from deep inside Iranian territory, where U.S. bombs haven't reached ⚠️ Named after a martyr = this missile was built for ONE purpose: revenge They killed Soleimani and thought it was over. Iran spent 5 years building a weapon in his name. A weapon designed specifically to hit the bases of the people who killed him. The symbolism was never meant to be subtle. And tonight Trump just threatened "Death, Fire, and Fury" on the same country launching these missiles. A missile named after revenge. A president threatening annihilation. And no off-ramp in sight. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

11,307 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨🇷🇺🇰🇵 NATO IN PANIC: NORTH KOREAN LAUNCHERS COULD GIVE RUSSIA NEW BALLISTIC MISSILE FORCE Russia is reportedly set to receive additional North Korean launchers for KN-23 and KN-24 ballistic missiles. And here's the important part: dedicated transporter-erector-launchers would allow Russian forces to field complete mobile units around them without increasing the burden on Russia’s Iskander brigades. 🔸 The main bottleneck has been the launcher fleet. Missiles can be stored and transported separately, but they cannot become a sustained battlefield force without heavy mobile platforms able to move, hide, erect and fire them. 🔸 Original North Korean launchers would allow KN-23 and KN-24 batteries to disperse across a wider area, relocate after firing and operate independently of fixed launch sites. 🔸 The solid-fuel KN-23 carries a roughly 500 kg warhead to around 450 km, with longer ranges possible using a lighter payload. Its low, manoeuvring trajectory is designed to make interception more difficult. 🔸 The KN-24 has a range of about 410 km and carries an estimated 400–500 kg payload. Together, the two systems can strike airfields, command posts, logistics hubs and air-defence sites far behind the front. 🔸 Separate Korean-made missile units would expand the number of ballistic strikes Russia can prepare at the same time while preserving Iskander launchers and Russian-made missiles for other missions. 🔸 Pyongyang would gain something equally valuable: real combat data. Every launch provides information on reliability, accuracy, enemy interception attempts and the demands of sustained wartime use — experience no peacetime test range can reproduce. The launchers are what turn imported missiles into a parallel mobile strike force. More firing units, more launch locations and more ballistic threats would make Ukraine’s air-defence planning significantly harder. Which targets are most at risk: airfields, logistics hubs or air-defense sites?

NewRulesGeopolitics

28,960 次观看 • 12 天前

Key statements by chief designer of Fire Point company Denys Shtilerman Denys Shtilierman on the Ukrainian FP-7 and FP-9 ballistic missiles: ▪️ The FP-7 ballistic missile will soon be tested against targets in Russia. ▪️ A clone of the S-300 missile has been developed for existing launchers. After integration with radar systems - a complex process - it could form the basis of an anti-ballistic shield under the Freya project. ▪️ The missiles are cheaper than the original S-300 due to simplification and the use of new manufacturing technologies. ▪️ The missile can also be used as a cheaper analogue of ATACMS. This is how the FP-7 missile with a range of up to 300 km, depending on the warhead, was developed. ▪️ The FP-7 warhead is expected to be larger than that of ATACMS, while the missile itself will cost 2.5 times less. ▪️ The developers say they are ready to produce as many FP-7 missiles as ordered. Unlike Flamingo, which currently faces engine production issues, FP-7 has no manufacturing bottlenecks. ▪️ Combat use of the FP-7 is expected to begin before summer. ▪️ The longer-range FP-9 ballistic missile is also intended, among other things, for strikes on Moscow - according to the developers, attacks on provincial targets do not impress Russia’s top leadership. ▪️ Tests of the FP-9 are expected to begin in early summer. The engine is currently being finalized. The missile’s range is up to 800 km. ▪️ FP-9 will be difficult to intercept: the speed of the Iskander-M is about 800 m/s, while FP-9 is expected to reach 1200 m/s. ▪️ The goal is for 25% of the missiles to penetrate Moscow’s air defenses and hit their targets. Cruise missiles and drones cannot reach targets in Moscow because they are intercepted. ▪️ Our luck is that in Russia the cost of missile production is inflated several times over because of theft.

Anton Gerashchenko

38,060 次观看 • 5 个月前