Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇮🇱🇵🇸 NETANYAHU: THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY IS CORRUPT AND HAS NO ELECTIONS Netanyahu spoke about the Palestinian Authority and why he believes it cannot govern Gaza. He argued that the PA was already expelled once and described it as corrupt and entrenched with no electoral legitimacy. He contrasted that with... Israel’s regular elections and said pressure inside his own government has pushed him to consider removing the PA entirely. He said he refuses to do that but insists that any future framework must force real reforms to stop incitement and terror funding. He framed it as the baseline for any path forward: “I think the Palestinian authority was in Gaza. We've already tried that, and they were kicked out summarily. They're very corrupt. They're, they're just, they've never had elections. You know, I go to elections every few years. I'm happy that I win them. But we have a free society and people make up their mind. That's not what happens in the, you know, in Judas, Samara, the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority just doesn't have elections. They have this petrified structure, and it's true. I said to my people, no, we're not, we're not gonna bring them down. Even though I have a lot of people who are egging me to do that, but we'll keep them at bay.” Source: Drop Siteshow more

Mario Nawfal

2,686,566 subscribers

21,999 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇮🇱🇵🇸 At DealBook, Netanyahu made it clear: no future Palestinian state, no role for the Palestinian Authority, and no peace unless Israel controls who governs Gaza. He dismissed the PA as “corrupt,” “petrified,” and unfit for elections. He blamed Palestinian textbooks, prisoners, even street names—then insisted “they’re not a partner for peace.” His solution is unelected Palestinians, hand-picked by Israel, to “take over Gaza eventually.”

🇮🇱🇵🇸 At DealBook, Netanyahu made it clear: no future Palestinian state, no role for the Palestinian Authority, and no peace unless Israel controls who governs Gaza. He dismissed the PA as “corrupt,” “petrified,” and unfit for elections. He blamed Palestinian textbooks, prisoners, even street names—then insisted “they’re not a partner for peace.” His solution is unelected Palestinians, hand-picked by Israel, to “take over Gaza eventually.”

DD Geopolitics

10,764 views • 8 months ago

.Scott Jennings with a reality check about the conflict in Iran: Iran was already as adversarial as possible for 47 years. Trump tried diplomacy, they blew it, and now we've destroyed their military and turned their neighbors against them. Jennings: “I don't agree that this conflict has somehow hardened Iran even further. I think they were already as adversarial to the United States as they could be. They've been adversarial to us for 47 years, and it was this president that decided to try to do something about it. He also tried to give diplomacy a chance. I concur that, you know, there was always a high percentage chance the Iranians were never gonna come to the table here in a meaningful way in good faith. I'm not surprised it's ending this way. You know, the morning that the President signed the MOU, I talked to him, and he said to me, as he'd said publicly, "Look, if they don't behave and they don't meet their obligations, we'll go back to the military campaign." That's what he has decided to do. And now it may just be time to say, "Look, we're not gonna have some grand peace deal, and we're gonna have to monitor these guys. We're probably on the street, they're not gonna get a penny, in sanctions relief, and, you know, and, and the outcomes here are we've destroyed their military and turned all their neighbors against them."”

.Scott Jennings with a reality check about the conflict in Iran: Iran was already as adversarial as possible for 47 years. Trump tried diplomacy, they blew it, and now we've destroyed their military and turned their neighbors against them. Jennings: “I don't agree that this conflict has somehow hardened Iran even further. I think they were already as adversarial to the United States as they could be. They've been adversarial to us for 47 years, and it was this president that decided to try to do something about it. He also tried to give diplomacy a chance. I concur that, you know, there was always a high percentage chance the Iranians were never gonna come to the table here in a meaningful way in good faith. I'm not surprised it's ending this way. You know, the morning that the President signed the MOU, I talked to him, and he said to me, as he'd said publicly, "Look, if they don't behave and they don't meet their obligations, we'll go back to the military campaign." That's what he has decided to do. And now it may just be time to say, "Look, we're not gonna have some grand peace deal, and we're gonna have to monitor these guys. We're probably on the street, they're not gonna get a penny, in sanctions relief, and, you know, and, and the outcomes here are we've destroyed their military and turned all their neighbors against them."”

Steve Guest

71,123 views • 26 days ago

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Camus

41,966 views • 10 months ago

"I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard." ~Rubio As expected... No Disclosure. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Nothing new, and Hannity started off with a "fun" question about The Age of Disclosure. 🙄 If you've followed my tweets the past few days, what Rubio said, or didn't say, should come as no surprise. He said they used "selective editing" in the doc and was interviewed 3-4 years ago. That's why I said we needed to hear the entire interview, uncut. Rubio: ""I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard. I don't have independent knowledge that what they're saying is true. We have people with very high jobs in the USG that are either, A) Liars, B) Crazy or C) Telling the truth. And two of those three options are not good. I don't know the answer. I don't want to call them liars, I just don't have any independent way to verify every things they said."

"I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard." ~Rubio As expected... No Disclosure. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Nothing new, and Hannity started off with a "fun" question about The Age of Disclosure. 🙄 If you've followed my tweets the past few days, what Rubio said, or didn't say, should come as no surprise. He said they used "selective editing" in the doc and was interviewed 3-4 years ago. That's why I said we needed to hear the entire interview, uncut. Rubio: ""I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard. I don't have independent knowledge that what they're saying is true. We have people with very high jobs in the USG that are either, A) Liars, B) Crazy or C) Telling the truth. And two of those three options are not good. I don't know the answer. I don't want to call them liars, I just don't have any independent way to verify every things they said."

Joe Murgia

37,878 views • 8 months ago

Trump: “I watched that pass that Messi made, not knowing as much as the people in this room, but I know about sorts and I know a little bit about soccer but I watched Messi, and he was well guarded, right? And all of a sudden he is standing on the right, you understand what I'm talking about? I don't know – I just noticed it. Nobody talked about it, I just noticed it. I said, he is too well guarded by a great player. And then he moved to the right and the other player was just standing there. "And he had plenty of time. He kicked it…. You have a great player in England, who I play golf with, you know that, right?… I think they perhaps made a mistake when they made him a defensive player, what do I know about soccer?…we've got to be a little offensive, right? But no, I'm not going to call it. Look, what do I know about coaching? But that was a little unusual."

Trump: “I watched that pass that Messi made, not knowing as much as the people in this room, but I know about sorts and I know a little bit about soccer but I watched Messi, and he was well guarded, right? And all of a sudden he is standing on the right, you understand what I'm talking about? I don't know – I just noticed it. Nobody talked about it, I just noticed it. I said, he is too well guarded by a great player. And then he moved to the right and the other player was just standing there. "And he had plenty of time. He kicked it…. You have a great player in England, who I play golf with, you know that, right?… I think they perhaps made a mistake when they made him a defensive player, what do I know about soccer?…we've got to be a little offensive, right? But no, I'm not going to call it. Look, what do I know about coaching? But that was a little unusual."

Republicans against Trump

762,906 views • 17 days ago

🇺🇸TRUMP: ELON TOLD ME THESE BRILLIANT PEOPLE ‘MAKE LOVE TO THEIR COMPUTER’ “He attracts young people that are brilliant. And they love the country too. I said, 'What trait do they really have?' And the trait that they really have is that they're extraordinary with computers They can take them—he said, 'They make love to their computer.' I said, 'I don't want to hear about that.'" Source: RSBN

🇺🇸TRUMP: ELON TOLD ME THESE BRILLIANT PEOPLE ‘MAKE LOVE TO THEIR COMPUTER’ “He attracts young people that are brilliant. And they love the country too. I said, 'What trait do they really have?' And the trait that they really have is that they're extraordinary with computers They can take them—he said, 'They make love to their computer.' I said, 'I don't want to hear about that.'" Source: RSBN

Mario Nawfal

138,598 views • 1 year ago

"I'm addressing you (Gerb) who lied, to look in the mirror. Frankly, you should be ashamed of yourself." I gave him my cell number and, 'he never called me once." ~Lue ~ Lue Elizondo: "Another allegation that was made during this interview (between Gerb and Ross Coulthart) was that somehow General Clapper and I had had colluded with one another to try to go ahead and and create this soft disclosure. And that we were going to go ahead and and manage it and control it. That is ONE THOUSAND percent not accurate. In fact, we never had such a conversation, and Jim Clapper and I never met to have that conversation. "So, again, it's factually not correct. And the problem is, is that you have an individual here (Gerb) who is sensationalizing stuff and making stuff up - quite frankly - who has ulterior motives, that's deceiving you. And furthermore, they're getting attention on a national news network - that, by the way, I respect, and that's always been a friend of disclosure - and now manipulating them and providing false information to their audience, to the point where they're like a tabloid, and I think this is problematic. "If you wanna know why I have always said I want to destroy ufology and replace it with something better, this is why. Because of bad actors like this. People who come out, they're just interested in clicks and likes. They're only interested in manufactured and false drama, and they're going about doing things that are actually putting disclosure further back than where we are. And this is a problem. "I'll share something else with you, too, another anecdote about to show you the character of this individual. Recently, as a month ago, I attended a function in Washington D.C. this individual happened to be there. I didn't know who he was, but I saw a circle of people surrounding him, and they were berating him. I worried for his kind of his safety to some degree, and maybe figured he was getting picked on, and walked over and interjected. "And, as I pulled him away, I was told, 'Hey, that's the guy that's been talking crap about everybody and been making things up.' So, I pulled him aside and I said, 'Hey, look, these people are obviously pretty upset with you. If you have any questions in the future, here's my personal cell phone number.' Now, this went against my better judgment, but I did it anyways. As you all know, I'm very open and transparent. "So I said, 'Look, if you ever have any questions, please give me a call.' And obviously, he he looked at me. He had what looked like tears in his eyes, and he looked at me, said, "Okay, sir. Yes, I promise. I'll do that. I'll make sure that that I call you if I have any questions in the future, and I won't do that, and just just start spewing off garbage'. And I said, 'Good. I appreciate that. You know, we can be friends. Whether you agree with me or not. I'm happy to give you information. Just reach out to me, and I can clarify stuff.' "Well, guess what? A month later, he goes on a network television series and and starts spewing off more crap that was completely wrong. He never called me once, right? So so what what kind of due diligence, investigative-type skill set does it require just to go out and make up stuff about people, right? "And this why we're having a problem. If you want to know what's wrong with the UFO community, you have people out there. And by the way, yes, I'm addressing you (Gerb) who lied, to look in the mirror. You're the reason why we're having this problem with disclosure. You're the reason why people don't take this topic seriously. And frankly, you should be ashamed of yourself. "I know I'm ashamed for what you did. You should be embarrassed. And the fact that you're talking to people and claiming you have access to stuff you don't? I don't ever remember you in any of the meetings that I was at at the Pentagon or at AATIP, quite frankly. In fact, if you want inside information, going to talk to somebody and saying you have an inside source, as far as I'm concerned, that's called gossip. That's not information." (Lue went on to suggest what sounded to me like a possible lawsuit against Gerb. To be honest, when I first heard Gerb say this, I thought it was a potential slander issue. But it's hard to win a lawsuit with that if the person (Lue) is a public person.)

"I'm addressing you (Gerb) who lied, to look in the mirror. Frankly, you should be ashamed of yourself." I gave him my cell number and, 'he never called me once." ~Lue ~ Lue Elizondo: "Another allegation that was made during this interview (between Gerb and Ross Coulthart) was that somehow General Clapper and I had had colluded with one another to try to go ahead and and create this soft disclosure. And that we were going to go ahead and and manage it and control it. That is ONE THOUSAND percent not accurate. In fact, we never had such a conversation, and Jim Clapper and I never met to have that conversation. "So, again, it's factually not correct. And the problem is, is that you have an individual here (Gerb) who is sensationalizing stuff and making stuff up - quite frankly - who has ulterior motives, that's deceiving you. And furthermore, they're getting attention on a national news network - that, by the way, I respect, and that's always been a friend of disclosure - and now manipulating them and providing false information to their audience, to the point where they're like a tabloid, and I think this is problematic. "If you wanna know why I have always said I want to destroy ufology and replace it with something better, this is why. Because of bad actors like this. People who come out, they're just interested in clicks and likes. They're only interested in manufactured and false drama, and they're going about doing things that are actually putting disclosure further back than where we are. And this is a problem. "I'll share something else with you, too, another anecdote about to show you the character of this individual. Recently, as a month ago, I attended a function in Washington D.C. this individual happened to be there. I didn't know who he was, but I saw a circle of people surrounding him, and they were berating him. I worried for his kind of his safety to some degree, and maybe figured he was getting picked on, and walked over and interjected. "And, as I pulled him away, I was told, 'Hey, that's the guy that's been talking crap about everybody and been making things up.' So, I pulled him aside and I said, 'Hey, look, these people are obviously pretty upset with you. If you have any questions in the future, here's my personal cell phone number.' Now, this went against my better judgment, but I did it anyways. As you all know, I'm very open and transparent. "So I said, 'Look, if you ever have any questions, please give me a call.' And obviously, he he looked at me. He had what looked like tears in his eyes, and he looked at me, said, "Okay, sir. Yes, I promise. I'll do that. I'll make sure that that I call you if I have any questions in the future, and I won't do that, and just just start spewing off garbage'. And I said, 'Good. I appreciate that. You know, we can be friends. Whether you agree with me or not. I'm happy to give you information. Just reach out to me, and I can clarify stuff.' "Well, guess what? A month later, he goes on a network television series and and starts spewing off more crap that was completely wrong. He never called me once, right? So so what what kind of due diligence, investigative-type skill set does it require just to go out and make up stuff about people, right? "And this why we're having a problem. If you want to know what's wrong with the UFO community, you have people out there. And by the way, yes, I'm addressing you (Gerb) who lied, to look in the mirror. You're the reason why we're having this problem with disclosure. You're the reason why people don't take this topic seriously. And frankly, you should be ashamed of yourself. "I know I'm ashamed for what you did. You should be embarrassed. And the fact that you're talking to people and claiming you have access to stuff you don't? I don't ever remember you in any of the meetings that I was at at the Pentagon or at AATIP, quite frankly. In fact, if you want inside information, going to talk to somebody and saying you have an inside source, as far as I'm concerned, that's called gossip. That's not information." (Lue went on to suggest what sounded to me like a possible lawsuit against Gerb. To be honest, when I first heard Gerb say this, I thought it was a potential slander issue. But it's hard to win a lawsuit with that if the person (Lue) is a public person.)

Joe Murgia

17,688 views • 5 days ago

CBS’s Ed O'Keefe: “He sidestepped a — a judge and a jury's decisions on the cases involving his son. He criticized the political nature of the prosecution. The next president has spent the last several years vowing to upend the justice Department and the FBI. Looking at their current and future presidents, Why should any American continue to have confidence in the American justice system?” KJP: “Well, the President does have confidence in the American justice system, um — and he said that in his statement, certainly — uh — continues to have confidence in the Department of Justice — uh — what he —” O’Keefe: “Two leaders who —” KJP: “Oh, okay.” O’Keefe: “— single out incidents that involve them or their families and say — ” KJP: “Well, can I —” O’Keefe: “— ‘well, it wouldn’t be fair to me, but the rest of you should agree with it.’” KJP: “— I — can I — can I just be very blunt here? Uh — the situation with Hunter Biden and what the incoming president has said are very different.” O’Keefe: “But they're making similar arguments —” KJP: “Well — yeah — but —” O’Keefe: “— which is that they've been unfairly prosecuted because of who they are.” KJP: “— but — but I don't think, I don't think those two things are the same. I just don't. I don't — they're not the same. They're just not — and — um — and I think the American people understand that. I do. I do think they believe and understand that they're not the same. Uh — what the president's son had to go through — uh — and what we've heard from legal experts, former U.S. attorneys general who look at this case, who understand this case and have said, this would not — virtually — there would not be the situation — uh — and I think that's important to note as well, and they've been very clear about this. We've heard from many of them — legal experts, former U.S. attorneys — uh — from across the country again, have all agreed virtually no one would be criminally prosecuted with felony offenses with these facts. I talked about these facts as it relates to the gun charges and tax cases that — that obviously — uh — Hunter Biden's case, and so that is — uh — uh — you take their word for it. You can take their word for it.”

CBS’s Ed O'Keefe: “He sidestepped a — a judge and a jury's decisions on the cases involving his son. He criticized the political nature of the prosecution. The next president has spent the last several years vowing to upend the justice Department and the FBI. Looking at their current and future presidents, Why should any American continue to have confidence in the American justice system?” KJP: “Well, the President does have confidence in the American justice system, um — and he said that in his statement, certainly — uh — continues to have confidence in the Department of Justice — uh — what he —” O’Keefe: “Two leaders who —” KJP: “Oh, okay.” O’Keefe: “— single out incidents that involve them or their families and say — ” KJP: “Well, can I —” O’Keefe: “— ‘well, it wouldn’t be fair to me, but the rest of you should agree with it.’” KJP: “— I — can I — can I just be very blunt here? Uh — the situation with Hunter Biden and what the incoming president has said are very different.” O’Keefe: “But they're making similar arguments —” KJP: “Well — yeah — but —” O’Keefe: “— which is that they've been unfairly prosecuted because of who they are.” KJP: “— but — but I don't think, I don't think those two things are the same. I just don't. I don't — they're not the same. They're just not — and — um — and I think the American people understand that. I do. I do think they believe and understand that they're not the same. Uh — what the president's son had to go through — uh — and what we've heard from legal experts, former U.S. attorneys general who look at this case, who understand this case and have said, this would not — virtually — there would not be the situation — uh — and I think that's important to note as well, and they've been very clear about this. We've heard from many of them — legal experts, former U.S. attorneys — uh — from across the country again, have all agreed virtually no one would be criminally prosecuted with felony offenses with these facts. I talked about these facts as it relates to the gun charges and tax cases that — that obviously — uh — Hunter Biden's case, and so that is — uh — uh — you take their word for it. You can take their word for it.”

Curtis Houck

407,350 views • 1 year ago

ZELENSKYY ON HIS CONVERSATION WITH ABRAMOVICH: Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. ZELENSKYY: Abramovich, so he came to Kyiv,bI think that he said: "I have message direct to you, and I want to get message, and take message from you, and to give it to Putin." But he said that it has to be silently, without any kind of, public messages. I said, "Look, it's your choice. Okay, for us it doesn't matter, public or un-public." But it's always with Russians such way. If they say something has to be between us, it's mean that tomorrow not only we will know about it. But it's not a secret. He came, and he wanted to give me the message that they want to to understand what we are ready to do. I said: "The question is not about us. You are fighting against us on our territory." And I said to him about Donbas, it was the key message. And I said: "No, we will not leave, and we will not go out from our territory. No, we will not give you a victory such way. And you will not get it." And we spoke about any kind of compromises. I said that all the compromises after ceasefire. Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. JOURNALIST: So is he a go-between now? Between you and Vladimir Putin, he's going back and forth? ZELENSKYY: I don't know. When he got message from me, he said he will go directly to Putin. I said: "Okay, I'm ready to meet, not in Moscow, not in Belarus, and not in Minsk," and it's understandable why. I said, "You can choose any time from tomorrow. You can choose any day, any format. We can choose with President Trump. I'm sure that he will be ready to come, and we can do it with Europeans. I'm sure that everybody want to help, or we can choose the way bilateral, just bilateral meeting."

ZELENSKYY ON HIS CONVERSATION WITH ABRAMOVICH: Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. ZELENSKYY: Abramovich, so he came to Kyiv,bI think that he said: "I have message direct to you, and I want to get message, and take message from you, and to give it to Putin." But he said that it has to be silently, without any kind of, public messages. I said, "Look, it's your choice. Okay, for us it doesn't matter, public or un-public." But it's always with Russians such way. If they say something has to be between us, it's mean that tomorrow not only we will know about it. But it's not a secret. He came, and he wanted to give me the message that they want to to understand what we are ready to do. I said: "The question is not about us. You are fighting against us on our territory." And I said to him about Donbas, it was the key message. And I said: "No, we will not leave, and we will not go out from our territory. No, we will not give you a victory such way. And you will not get it." And we spoke about any kind of compromises. I said that all the compromises after ceasefire. Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. JOURNALIST: So is he a go-between now? Between you and Vladimir Putin, he's going back and forth? ZELENSKYY: I don't know. When he got message from me, he said he will go directly to Putin. I said: "Okay, I'm ready to meet, not in Moscow, not in Belarus, and not in Minsk," and it's understandable why. I said, "You can choose any time from tomorrow. You can choose any day, any format. We can choose with President Trump. I'm sure that he will be ready to come, and we can do it with Europeans. I'm sure that everybody want to help, or we can choose the way bilateral, just bilateral meeting."

Kateryna Lisunova

25,494 views • 1 month ago

Additional video footage—ICE breaks window to arrest husband in front of 8 month pregnant wife. Cristian Solorio told Telemundo Chicago: "He told me that he was asking for the arrest warrant and that they don't have it... Okay, but they're going to break the window [he told me]...I tell him they can't do that... I know, but they're doing it [he says] and then I heard the bang when I got there and I yelled at them to not do it. He was still buckled up inside the SUV."

Additional video footage—ICE breaks window to arrest husband in front of 8 month pregnant wife. Cristian Solorio told Telemundo Chicago: "He told me that he was asking for the arrest warrant and that they don't have it... Okay, but they're going to break the window [he told me]...I tell him they can't do that... I know, but they're doing it [he says] and then I heard the bang when I got there and I yelled at them to not do it. He was still buckled up inside the SUV."

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

47,012 views • 1 year ago

DSA candidate Melat Kiros: "We need to have messengers like Graham Platner... A lot of folks are saying, 'Maybe he could have changed, but that doesn't mean that we have to elect him senator.' And I'm like, I actually think it does. I do. I think we have to show -- particularly young white men who have said some of the outlandish things he has said when he was younger, who have experimented with tattoos in the way that he has -- for them to know that those mistakes are not the end-all-be-all and that there is redemption and opportunity after the fact."

DSA candidate Melat Kiros: "We need to have messengers like Graham Platner... A lot of folks are saying, 'Maybe he could have changed, but that doesn't mean that we have to elect him senator.' And I'm like, I actually think it does. I do. I think we have to show -- particularly young white men who have said some of the outlandish things he has said when he was younger, who have experimented with tattoos in the way that he has -- for them to know that those mistakes are not the end-all-be-all and that there is redemption and opportunity after the fact."

Breitbart News

41,253 views • 1 month ago

Claiming that MPs and Ministers have more powers, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake said he expects that all Ministers will know the limits of their powers and act with accountability. Addressing the new Cabinet, he said most of the Ministers are new, not only to the Cabinet but to Parliament as well. The President said he was well aware that all of them are honest and not corrupt and that they have the courage to fulfil the aspirations of the people.

Claiming that MPs and Ministers have more powers, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake said he expects that all Ministers will know the limits of their powers and act with accountability. Addressing the new Cabinet, he said most of the Ministers are new, not only to the Cabinet but to Parliament as well. The President said he was well aware that all of them are honest and not corrupt and that they have the courage to fulfil the aspirations of the people.

DailyMirror

11,667 views • 1 year ago

Taehyung is the biggest factor that attract new people to BTS, in addition to his amazing talents, Taehyung is extremely genuine, he doesn’t let society dictate his actions. He is unapologetically himself and that’s a man worth following. 👩🏻 I stayed up last night watching interviews of BTS. The more I get to know them, the more I love them. They are unapologetically themselves, and they're so real, and I think that's why they have such a strong fan base. I was watching this one interview with, I think it was Rolling Stone, and in the middle of the interview, V, he was talking about one of the songs, and JM said, Hey, you have snot coming out of your nose. And V just stopped, got some tissue paper, shoved it up his left nostril, and went on with the interview like it was nothing. I love that so much. He did not care. As someone who is also Korean, for most of us, we're raised to be, to be prim and proper in front of people that we don't know. There are certain expectations of you, certain things that you're supposed to say, things that you're not supposed to say. The fact that he just went in with the interview, he did not let that stop him. For most celebrities that would have been in the same situation, what they probably would have done, most likely, is pause the interview, go to the restroom, take care of business, come back, and ask the people to edit that part out. He didn't do that, you guys. And I've already been a big fan of them, and now I'm an even bigger fan. (

Taehyung is the biggest factor that attract new people to BTS, in addition to his amazing talents, Taehyung is extremely genuine, he doesn’t let society dictate his actions. He is unapologetically himself and that’s a man worth following. 👩🏻 I stayed up last night watching interviews of BTS. The more I get to know them, the more I love them. They are unapologetically themselves, and they're so real, and I think that's why they have such a strong fan base. I was watching this one interview with, I think it was Rolling Stone, and in the middle of the interview, V, he was talking about one of the songs, and JM said, Hey, you have snot coming out of your nose. And V just stopped, got some tissue paper, shoved it up his left nostril, and went on with the interview like it was nothing. I love that so much. He did not care. As someone who is also Korean, for most of us, we're raised to be, to be prim and proper in front of people that we don't know. There are certain expectations of you, certain things that you're supposed to say, things that you're not supposed to say. The fact that he just went in with the interview, he did not let that stop him. For most celebrities that would have been in the same situation, what they probably would have done, most likely, is pause the interview, go to the restroom, take care of business, come back, and ask the people to edit that part out. He didn't do that, you guys. And I've already been a big fan of them, and now I'm an even bigger fan. (

V

42,538 views • 2 months ago

Donald Trump told the story of how he decided on the war, which was that stock prices were so high he could afford to attack Iran. To get advice on the decision he asked Susie Wiles. Now you know why they had no clue the Strait of Hormuz would shut down. Try to read it. “We're doing great. I went to Susie my beautiful Susie Wiles. There's nobody like Susie. I went to Susie. Right? And everybody's with her and she's a great woman really she's a great woman. But I went to Susie. I always go to Susie. I said Susie do you mind if I take a little excursion here? Do you mind if I you know we're hitting all these records, right? Most more people are working in the United States today than ever before as I can name this I don't want to bore you Because this is all about Ireland but you're a big part of it because you're a big part of this country but I said do you mind if I take a little excursion my chief of staff because I want to do this. I have Marco here. We have a lot of our great people JD is here. They're all here and I say let's let's do this. We're gonna do it right should have been done by many presidents should have been done Long before 47 years. It's 40 years of living in terror You know, they're they're called the bully of the Middle East But they're really the bully of the world because he used oil to bribe right? He used oil to bribe and to you know gain power. I don't know what they gained. What are they gained? What the hell? How are they doing? Not so good. They're all gone now. Every one of them. They're all gone. We don't even know who to our biggest problem. We don't know who to deal with over here. I can call the speaker of the house He's so powerful. I can call him. I can make a deal maybe I can even call your Democrat counterpart this guy. I said to Kelly. What do you think of your counterpart? He said he's a great guy. This is Republican Democrat. I never thought I was gonna hear that about you. Let me shake your hand. When Kelly when Kelly tells me that I said that's the way it used to be You know, that's the way it not so long ago and maybe someday that's the way it'll be again. It's really great. But I said you mind of I take a little excursion Because we have to do something and it'll be a short term excursion? But we have all these great things going and we had to say you know, we could have. What could have gone up up? It was only going in one direction. But I think now it's gonna go much higher than it would have gone had we not taken this little journey. And so I appreciate all of the people that have worked with us I was not an easy decision to make we have a country that was hotter than any country anywhere in the world and Doing great in every way and I say oh, we have to put out this this cancer. It's a cancer We had to take that operation and we did and it was very successful and continues frankly as somebody said very they could leave today. And it would take ten years to rebuild the damage has been done. But I think we have to make it a little bit more permanent because no other president has to go through this and we shouldn't have any other President having to go through this kind of a thing and If they didn't want to do it if for some reason they didn't want to do it. Would have the same problem. We don't ever want to have that problem again Not with lunatics. We can't have lunatics controlling nuclear weaponry. So I just want to thank everybody.”

Donald Trump told the story of how he decided on the war, which was that stock prices were so high he could afford to attack Iran. To get advice on the decision he asked Susie Wiles. Now you know why they had no clue the Strait of Hormuz would shut down. Try to read it. “We're doing great. I went to Susie my beautiful Susie Wiles. There's nobody like Susie. I went to Susie. Right? And everybody's with her and she's a great woman really she's a great woman. But I went to Susie. I always go to Susie. I said Susie do you mind if I take a little excursion here? Do you mind if I you know we're hitting all these records, right? Most more people are working in the United States today than ever before as I can name this I don't want to bore you Because this is all about Ireland but you're a big part of it because you're a big part of this country but I said do you mind if I take a little excursion my chief of staff because I want to do this. I have Marco here. We have a lot of our great people JD is here. They're all here and I say let's let's do this. We're gonna do it right should have been done by many presidents should have been done Long before 47 years. It's 40 years of living in terror You know, they're they're called the bully of the Middle East But they're really the bully of the world because he used oil to bribe right? He used oil to bribe and to you know gain power. I don't know what they gained. What are they gained? What the hell? How are they doing? Not so good. They're all gone now. Every one of them. They're all gone. We don't even know who to our biggest problem. We don't know who to deal with over here. I can call the speaker of the house He's so powerful. I can call him. I can make a deal maybe I can even call your Democrat counterpart this guy. I said to Kelly. What do you think of your counterpart? He said he's a great guy. This is Republican Democrat. I never thought I was gonna hear that about you. Let me shake your hand. When Kelly when Kelly tells me that I said that's the way it used to be You know, that's the way it not so long ago and maybe someday that's the way it'll be again. It's really great. But I said you mind of I take a little excursion Because we have to do something and it'll be a short term excursion? But we have all these great things going and we had to say you know, we could have. What could have gone up up? It was only going in one direction. But I think now it's gonna go much higher than it would have gone had we not taken this little journey. And so I appreciate all of the people that have worked with us I was not an easy decision to make we have a country that was hotter than any country anywhere in the world and Doing great in every way and I say oh, we have to put out this this cancer. It's a cancer We had to take that operation and we did and it was very successful and continues frankly as somebody said very they could leave today. And it would take ten years to rebuild the damage has been done. But I think we have to make it a little bit more permanent because no other president has to go through this and we shouldn't have any other President having to go through this kind of a thing and If they didn't want to do it if for some reason they didn't want to do it. Would have the same problem. We don't ever want to have that problem again Not with lunatics. We can't have lunatics controlling nuclear weaponry. So I just want to thank everybody.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

671,091 views • 4 months ago

When President Trump praised DOGE for uncovering billions in government waste and fraud. "It's about a man named Elon Musk, and he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation, and we appreciate it. And just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly, helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations. And you know the kinds of things that he's he's found, and his people have found, he's brought a group of very smart people in, and they found things that are pretty unbelievable. I have to say that the numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be very much more substantial with time, because many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them, but the numbers could double and triple, because many, many things, we don't want to go out with them until we're sure. With the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington. Doge has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people and computers. I actually asked Elon one time, what's their primary thing, and they have a lot of primary things, all having to do with being smart. But he said the thing that they're really the best that is working with computers so that they can't be outsmarted by somebody that's not so honest, that happens to also be good with computers, but not as good as these people, but the mindset of the senior ranks of every federal department, and it's really changed, and with Elon's guidance they're helping to detect fraud slash waste and modernize broken and outdated systems."

When President Trump praised DOGE for uncovering billions in government waste and fraud. "It's about a man named Elon Musk, and he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation, and we appreciate it. And just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly, helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations. And you know the kinds of things that he's he's found, and his people have found, he's brought a group of very smart people in, and they found things that are pretty unbelievable. I have to say that the numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be very much more substantial with time, because many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them, but the numbers could double and triple, because many, many things, we don't want to go out with them until we're sure. With the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington. Doge has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people and computers. I actually asked Elon one time, what's their primary thing, and they have a lot of primary things, all having to do with being smart. But he said the thing that they're really the best that is working with computers so that they can't be outsmarted by somebody that's not so honest, that happens to also be good with computers, but not as good as these people, but the mindset of the senior ranks of every federal department, and it's really changed, and with Elon's guidance they're helping to detect fraud slash waste and modernize broken and outdated systems."

DogeDesigner

81,289 views • 1 month ago

Channel 4 host asks Arab Barghouti, son of imprisoned Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti: “There’s speculation, or hope, that there could be Palestinian elections within the next year. Is it your father’s wish to contest those elections, and to be released in time? Arab said he’ll “have to wait until he can speak with him,” noting that for the past three years Israel has kept Marwan in solitary confinement and blocked all family contact, allowing only five or six brief visits from his lawyer. He added that when elections were expected a few years ago, Marwan “publicly declared he would run for president.” Arab continued: “I believe he has the legitimacy and moral authority to bridge divides between all Palestinian factions. Unity has always been his political legacy. If you look back at the Prisoners’ Document of 2006, he brought together every Palestinian faction — and to this day, it remains the only document signed by all of them. It clearly stated that the Palestinian state should be built on the 1967 borders, that resistance should be limited to within those borders, and that targeting civilians should be forbidden. He is capable of leading political initiatives that are reasonable and widely accepted — and that’s precisely why this current fascist Israeli government fears him.”

Channel 4 host asks Arab Barghouti, son of imprisoned Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti: “There’s speculation, or hope, that there could be Palestinian elections within the next year. Is it your father’s wish to contest those elections, and to be released in time? Arab said he’ll “have to wait until he can speak with him,” noting that for the past three years Israel has kept Marwan in solitary confinement and blocked all family contact, allowing only five or six brief visits from his lawyer. He added that when elections were expected a few years ago, Marwan “publicly declared he would run for president.” Arab continued: “I believe he has the legitimacy and moral authority to bridge divides between all Palestinian factions. Unity has always been his political legacy. If you look back at the Prisoners’ Document of 2006, he brought together every Palestinian faction — and to this day, it remains the only document signed by all of them. It clearly stated that the Palestinian state should be built on the 1967 borders, that resistance should be limited to within those borders, and that targeting civilians should be forbidden. He is capable of leading political initiatives that are reasonable and widely accepted — and that’s precisely why this current fascist Israeli government fears him.”

Drop Site

59,623 views • 9 months ago

CBS’s Lesley Stahl: Do you foresee Gaza (or a future Palestinian state) as a democracy or a government run by a strongman? Kushner: “Too early to tell… let’s see if we can make it functional. And if we can make it functional, there’s a lot of ways to do it.” — ⭕️ NOTE: Israel has not permitted or facilitated Palestinian elections since 2006. The last Palestinian legislative elections were held in January 2006 — nearly 20 years ago. Hamas won that vote decisively, which led Israel (and the U.S.) to boycott the results and back Fatah’s expulsion of Hamas from West Bank institutions. Since then: • No elections have been allowed in Gaza or the West Bank. • In 2021, the Palestinian Authority planned elections, but Israel blocked voting in East Jerusalem and restricted movement of candidates and ballot materials, leading Mahmoud Abbas to cancel the vote.

CBS’s Lesley Stahl: Do you foresee Gaza (or a future Palestinian state) as a democracy or a government run by a strongman? Kushner: “Too early to tell… let’s see if we can make it functional. And if we can make it functional, there’s a lot of ways to do it.” — ⭕️ NOTE: Israel has not permitted or facilitated Palestinian elections since 2006. The last Palestinian legislative elections were held in January 2006 — nearly 20 years ago. Hamas won that vote decisively, which led Israel (and the U.S.) to boycott the results and back Fatah’s expulsion of Hamas from West Bank institutions. Since then: • No elections have been allowed in Gaza or the West Bank. • In 2021, the Palestinian Authority planned elections, but Israel blocked voting in East Jerusalem and restricted movement of candidates and ballot materials, leading Mahmoud Abbas to cancel the vote.

Drop Site

34,907 views • 9 months ago

“There were a lot of people in Washington DC and I know a lot of them and many of them have said to me separately that he was not handed that paper that morning. He was showing that image on his phone to people the day before at least, he was not just handed to him that morning. I'd been quiet for a long time about Lue Elizondo but I'm done being quiet about it because that was so blatant and ridiculous to me. I don't know if he's compromised, I don't know if he's being threatened, I don't know if this was always the plan.” Kelly Chase says Elizondo had the irrigation photo he showed before Congress longer than he initially said.

“There were a lot of people in Washington DC and I know a lot of them and many of them have said to me separately that he was not handed that paper that morning. He was showing that image on his phone to people the day before at least, he was not just handed to him that morning. I'd been quiet for a long time about Lue Elizondo but I'm done being quiet about it because that was so blatant and ridiculous to me. I don't know if he's compromised, I don't know if he's being threatened, I don't know if this was always the plan.” Kelly Chase says Elizondo had the irrigation photo he showed before Congress longer than he initially said.

Red Panda Koala

13,601 views • 1 year ago

Matthew McConaughey reveals the three words his dad said that changed his life “I said dad, I don't want to go to law school anymore. I want to go to film school and after about a 5 second pause, he goes, ‘Are you sure that's what you want to do?’ I reply yes sir” “Another long pause. Then I hear, ‘Well, don't halfass it’” “I remember just beaming, hopping up just like Yes! My dad not only said okay. The way he said don't halfass it, it was also, okay. Let's go big boy. Own that shit. Get some leverage. Get some horsepower behind where you're going. Go do it” “I remember to this day and I've learned this later I think from becoming a father, part of what I believe happened to him and why he said that to me that way on that call was the way that I asked him. I wasn't really asking. It was, ‘I don't want to go to law school, Dad. I want to go to film school.’ I didn't stutter. He heard his son saying this is what I want to do” “What I think happened to him in that moment is what I think any father, any parent loves. You raise your kids in a certain way and you give them a guideline, a ladder to climb and here's the guidelines and if you do it this way, you're most likely going to have some success in life and it'll work out for you and then when we do it that way, we can be proud parents” “But what do we really want to happen when our kids are out of the house and they're on their own? We kind of want them to call one day and go, ‘I'm breaking out. I'm going my own way.’ And as a parent, we go, as much as it may scare us, we're going, ‘Yes!’ I gave my kid the confidence and the courage and the foundation to say they're going to go their own way” “In a way, I think every parent honors and loves that moment. I heard my dad, when he didn't hear me stutter, when he heard me directly say what I said. I wasn't really asking him. Even though I was out of respect asking him, the way I said it, I wasn't asking him and I think he felt that” “Don't halfass it”

Matthew McConaughey reveals the three words his dad said that changed his life “I said dad, I don't want to go to law school anymore. I want to go to film school and after about a 5 second pause, he goes, ‘Are you sure that's what you want to do?’ I reply yes sir” “Another long pause. Then I hear, ‘Well, don't halfass it’” “I remember just beaming, hopping up just like Yes! My dad not only said okay. The way he said don't halfass it, it was also, okay. Let's go big boy. Own that shit. Get some leverage. Get some horsepower behind where you're going. Go do it” “I remember to this day and I've learned this later I think from becoming a father, part of what I believe happened to him and why he said that to me that way on that call was the way that I asked him. I wasn't really asking. It was, ‘I don't want to go to law school, Dad. I want to go to film school.’ I didn't stutter. He heard his son saying this is what I want to do” “What I think happened to him in that moment is what I think any father, any parent loves. You raise your kids in a certain way and you give them a guideline, a ladder to climb and here's the guidelines and if you do it this way, you're most likely going to have some success in life and it'll work out for you and then when we do it that way, we can be proud parents” “But what do we really want to happen when our kids are out of the house and they're on their own? We kind of want them to call one day and go, ‘I'm breaking out. I'm going my own way.’ And as a parent, we go, as much as it may scare us, we're going, ‘Yes!’ I gave my kid the confidence and the courage and the foundation to say they're going to go their own way” “In a way, I think every parent honors and loves that moment. I heard my dad, when he didn't hear me stutter, when he heard me directly say what I said. I wasn't really asking him. Even though I was out of respect asking him, the way I said it, I wasn't asking him and I think he felt that” “Don't halfass it”

Jack

1,184,354 views • 2 months ago

John Bolton on Trump: Trump is trolling people. In the first term, I was in his office once. He was dictating a tweet, and he told the person typing the tweet, "Capitalize all the letters in that last sentence." Then he turned to me and said, "Do you know why I just said that?" I said, "No, why?" And he said, "Because it drives them crazy." So why does he talk about taking Greenland? Because it drives them crazy. Source: Euronews

John Bolton on Trump: Trump is trolling people. In the first term, I was in his office once. He was dictating a tweet, and he told the person typing the tweet, "Capitalize all the letters in that last sentence." Then he turned to me and said, "Do you know why I just said that?" I said, "No, why?" And he said, "Because it drives them crazy." So why does he talk about taking Greenland? Because it drives them crazy. Source: Euronews

Clash Report

1,857,999 views • 25 days ago