Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🌐 Netflix Boycott Explained Video Sources: Netflix "Cuties" Netflix Jurrasic World: Camp Cretaceous Netflix CoComelon Lane Inappropriate Media Propaganda by Z Media Monopoly Break down their Media Monopoly! Share this! All ride together to wake each other up and tear down the Z Empire! 🫡 Unity for Vi☪️✝️ory!!

3,704,216 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🎥 DJ Akademiks Weighs In On Netflix’s New Diddy Documentary “The Reckoning” Produced by 50 Cent. Ak also goes over if 50 Cent is Sending A Warning To Jay Z That He Could Be Next ❓👀 The other night, Akademiks spoke on the now released Netflix doc and didn’t hold back. Here’s the breakdown: 🔹 Ak says Netflix is being “sheisty.” According to him, Netflix wanted this documentary badly and intentionally chose 50 Cent as the face so he’d take the heat for the controversy surrounding its creation. 🔹 The footage itself is questionable. Ak explains the documentary features Diddy’s own private footage video recorded by his team in the weeks leading up to his arrest. Diddy’s camp claims the footage was stolen and used unethically, yet Netflix still moved forward. 🔹 Why 50 Cent? Ak thinks it was strategic. He says Netflix needed a “villain” or a bold public figure to absorb the backlash, and 50 is perfect for that role. Plus, Ak points out a conflict of interest: 50’s child’s mother is one of the alleged victims, making it impossible for him to present a “neutral” documentary. 🔹 Netflix chose 50 over multiple bidders. Ak suggests the platform made that decision knowing 50 would be willing to go further than others and willing to be the face of the controversy. 🔹 Ak warns Jay-Z might be next. He mentions 50 even posted an alleged message from Jay-Z reacting to not being in the doc. With the documentary dropping two days before Jay-Z’s birthday, Ak believes 50 is sending a message and that Hov should “have a war chest ready” because 50 is clearly lining things up. 🔹 Ak’s final point: Diddy is already “down bad,” and 50 is stomping him out publicly but Ak believes 50 is also “looking over” at Jay-Z next.

Cousin Tino ™️

20,947 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Netflix just KILLED Hollywood... By pulling off the most INSANE power move of 2025. $82.7 billion for Warner Bros, HBO, and HBO Max. The streaming wars are officially over. But nobody understands what actually just happened... For YEARS, Ted Sarandos said: "We're builders, not buyers. We don't need a library." Then three weeks ago he pulled a complete 180. And the bidding war was brutal. Paramount thought they had it locked. David Ellison's dad is Larry Ellison, Oracle founder, one of the richest men alive. Paramount made THREE bids in September. All rejected. Too low. But Ellison kept pushing. He wanted the ENTIRE company including CNN, Discovery Channel, all the cable networks nobody else wanted. His pitch was simple: "We have White House relationships. Regulatory approval will be easy." For weeks, everyone thought Paramount would win. Then Netflix entered the chat... $27.75 per share. Mix of cash and stock. $82.7 billion total. Paramount countered with $30 per share, all cash, backed by three Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds. Higher bid. More cash. Should've won. But Netflix included something nobody saw coming: A $5.8 BILLION breakup fee. If Netflix walks away from this deal, they pay Warner Bros $5.8B. Nobody puts up breakup fees that big. Ever. It's Netflix saying "we're so confident we can fight regulators and win, we'll bet $5.8B on it." Paramount lost their minds. Thursday morning, Paramount's lawyers sent a 4,000-word letter to Warner Bros CEO David Zaslav. The letter accused Warner Bros of rigging the process. Said Zaslav had "personal interests in post-transaction roles." Translation: Zaslav wants a job at Netflix after the deal closes, so he's giving them preferential treatment. They're literally calling it corruption. But Netflix just sat on that $5.8B breakup fee and waited. In the end, Warner Bros picked Netflix. And here's the thing... This isn't about streaming. It's about OWNING the IP before AI makes production costs zero. Warner Bros owns: - Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman (entire DC Universe) - Harry Potter (full franchise rights) - Game of Thrones, The Sopranos, The Wire - Friends, The Big Bang Theory When AI video generation hits in 2-3 years, Netflix bets on "whoever owns the IP wins." They hope to generate infinite Batman movies and Harry Potter spinoffs using AI at near-zero marginal cost. The genius move though: Paramount wanted ALL of Warner Bros Discovery. Including dying cable networks (CNN, TNT, TBS). Netflix said: "We only want the studio and streaming." They're letting Warner Bros spin off the garbage cable channels. Then buying ONLY the profitable parts. Buy the assets. Leave the liabilities. This deal "kills three birds with one stone" according to Bank of America: Bird #1: Warner Bros Discovery ceases to exist as a competitor Bird #2: HBO Max (#3 streaming platform) merges with Netflix (#1) Bird #3: Every other studio is now officially screwed Netflix now has: - World's largest subscriber base (260M+) - Second-largest content library - The IP for infinite AI content - HBO's prestige brand - Warner Bros' theatrical distribution Game over. Anonymous Hollywood producers literally sent letters to Congress BEGGING them to block the deal. They didn't even sign their names. Too scared of Netflix retaliation. Senator Warren called it an "anti-monopoly nightmare." But none of it will matter. Deal's getting approved. What happens next? 2026: Discovery Global spins off (cable networks) 2026: Netflix acquisition closes 2027: HBO integration begins 2028: AI video generation launches 2029: AI-generated Batman and Harry Potter content By 2030, Netflix IS Hollywood. My take? Thid is smart SHORT TERM. Destroys competition. Locks in IP. But LONG TERM? When AI video hits, content libraries won't matter. Speed of generation will. Netflix just spent $82.7B on the past instead of the future. The next 3 years will tell us which one it is.

Ricardo

1,791,204 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten