Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

NEURALINK’S QUIET REVOLUTION: FROM THOUGHT TO TOTAL DEVICE DOMINION Elon detonated a new reality. “Any device that can be controlled via computer or phone can be controlled by a Neuralink implant.” That means everything... cars, drones, even your lights, could soon obey a thought. Neuralink confirmed it: current trial...

15,559 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Mathematics of Moving a Cursor with Neural Signals What might Neuralink Neuralink be doing Mathematically? Consider the task of moving a cursor without touching it. The machine is not looking for a full thought, a sentence, or an image. For this Control problem, the useful object is an intended movement state. sₜ = (pₜ, vₜ) Here, pₜ is the cursor position at time t, and vₜ is the velocity the user is trying to express. The implant records neural activity through many electrode channels, then the decoder tries to estimate vₜ from that activity. Neuralink’s PRIME material describes the N1 Implant as recording and transmitting brain activity with the goal of enabling computer control. For channel i, a simple population model is rᵢ(t) ≈ bᵢ + aᵢ max(0, dᵢ · vₜ) + ηᵢ(t) where rᵢ(t) is the measured activity, bᵢ is baseline activity, aᵢ is channel gain, dᵢ is the channel’s preferred movement direction, and ηᵢ(t) is noise. One channel is not the command. The useful signal is the pattern across many channels: rₜ = (r₁(t), r₂(t), …, rₙ(t)) The decoder subtracts the baseline vector b and applies a learned map W: v̂ₜ = W(rₜ − b) This gives an estimate of the intended velocity. The cursor then updates by pₜ₊₁ = pₜ + Δt v̂ₜ This is the loop shown in the render: neural activity -> decoded velocity -> cursor motion The cortical network and electrode threads show the measurement side. The N1 Implant is described as using 1,024 electrodes distributed across 64 flexible threads, each thinner than a human hair. The decoder panel shows the computational side with activity rₜ, decoded velocity v̂ₜ, and the cursor state pₜ changing over time. A noisy biological pattern becomes a state estimate. That estimate becomes motion on a screen. Therefore, the first lesson is not that Neuralink makes the brain a screen. For cursor control, the Mathematics is more precise: A small piece of intention is represented as a hidden state, measured through neural activity, decoded as a vector, and turned into action. #Neuralink #BrainComputerInterface #NeuralEngineering #Mathematics #StateEstimation #Neuroscience #MachineLearning #BiomedicalEngineering

Mathelirium

14,424 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk just stripped away every emotional narrative around paralysis and reduced it to a pure engineering equation. The human nervous system is not mystical. It is a biological wiring grid. When a wire breaks, you build a bypass. Traditional medicine treats a severed spinal cord as a permanent biological endpoint. Musk treats it as a broken routing switch. Musk: “It’s basically a communications bridge. You bridge the communications from the motor cortex past the point in the neck or spine where the nerves are damaged.” Not a miracle. Not a mystery. A bridge. Musk: “It is possible from a physics standpoint to restore full body functionality. There is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” The physics already check out. This is not a question of possibility. It is a question of execution speed. We are building AGI by mastering computational physics in silicon. Neuralink is applying that same mastery to carbon. The human body is not a sacred text. It is a machine. And machines can be patched. But this is bigger than medicine. Humanity’s ability to interface with superintelligence is currently bottlenecked by thumbs typing on a glass screen. Neuralink is the solution to that constraint dressed as a medical device. If you can bridge the brain past a broken spine, you can bridge the brain to a data center. Healing the paralyzed is step one. Merging with superintelligence is the endgame. Musk: “It’s a very hard technical problem, right, but there is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” Somewhere right now, a person is sitting in a wheelchair. An engineer is sitting in a lab. Neither knows the other exists. But one of them is quietly rewriting the definition of permanent. And it isn’t the one in the wheelchair.

Dustin

508,807 views • 4 months ago

i don't think people realize what just happened with brain implants in china for the first time in history, a brain implant has been approved for commercial sale. you can actually buy one. it's called neo. costs around $15,000. the question everyone asks first: does it actually work? here's what the implant does. a coin-sized chip gets placed on the surface of the brain, right over the area that controls movement. when a paralyzed patient imagines moving their hand, the chip reads that signal, sends it to a computer, and the computer drives a mechanical glove that moves for them picking up objects, gripping utensils, handling daily tasks. all from thought alone. the whole surgery takes an hour and 40 minutes. surgeons thin the skull, open a small window, and place two electrodes directly on the surface of the brain. then they close it up, patients go home within a week. 32 patients with spinal cord injuries were implanted in a clinical trial led by huashan hospital > ALL 32 regained the ability to grab objects through the glove. > 100% improvement rate. > zero adverse side effects. no other brain implant company on earth has received approval to sell their device commercially. elon's neuralink is still in clinical trials. side effects from their more invasive approach have stalled any path to regulatory clearance. china is the only country where you can buy a brain implant right now. this is by design. months before the approval, china published a national policy document with 17 steps to dominate the brain implant industry within 5 years. they want brain-reading devices to be as common as hearing aids. headbands, visors, earpieces that pick up brain signals... all mass-produced for consumers. and the government is coordinating the whole thing. funding the research, building the manufacturing, clearing the regulatory path, all at once. the West is moving painfully slow in comparison...still running controlled trials one patient group at a time. china already has a commercial product, a 72-year-old moving his leg on state television, and a national playbook to own the entire category.

Ole Lehmann

51,810 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk: As we advance the Neuralink devices, you should be able to actually have full body control and sensors from an Optimus robot So you could basically inhibit an Optimus robot. It's not just the hand, but the whole thing. So you could like basically mentally remote into an Optimus robot and be kind of cool. The future is gonna be weird, but pretty cool And then another thing that could be done also is like for people that have say lost a limb, lost an arm or leg or something like that, then we think in the future we'll be able to attach an Optimus arm or legs and so you kind of like I remember that scene from a Star Wars where Luke Skywalker gets his hand, you know, chopped off with a lightsaber and he gets kind of a robot hand And I think that's the kind of thing that we'll be able to do in the future working with Neuralink and Tesla. So it goes far beyond just operating a robot hand, but replacing limbs and having kind of a whole body robot experience. And then I think another thing that will be possible like I think it's very likely in the future is to be able to bridge the where the damaged neurons So you can take the signal from the brain and and transmit that signal past where the neurons are damaged or strained to the rest of the body, so you could reanimate the body. So that if you have a Neuralink implant in the brain and then one in the spinal cord, then you can actually bridge the signals and you could walk again and have full body functionality Obviously that's what people would prefer. To be clear, we realize that would be the preferred outcome. And so that even if you have a broken neck, you could still we believe I'm actually at this point I'd say fairly confident that at some point in the future we'll be able to restore full body functionality

X Freeze

229,737 views • 8 months ago

Elon Musk just revealed what happens when Neuralink and Optimus merge, and it’s not about helping the disabled. It’s about making them better than you. “You’d have basically Cybernetics Superpowers.” Not recovery. Evolution. Lose a limb and the replacement isn’t restoration. It’s upgrade to capabilities biology never provided. Optimus hardware. Neuralink bandwidth. Brain commands routing directly to mechanical limbs with zero latency. Musk: “The motor commands from your brain… now go to your robot arms or robot legs.” Neural signals hit robotic targets. Thought becomes motion. Precision exceeding anything flesh achieved. Not fixing disability. Creating advantage. Musk: “Combine that with a Neuralink.” Where his two biggest projects collide. Medical application for amputees becomes the wedge. Optimus arm attached. Neuralink implanted. Brain signals reroute to mechanical hardware seamlessly. Think movement. Machine executes. Not approximation of biological function. Direct neural control of superior platform. Musk: “Motor commands from your brain… go to your robot arms.” The gap between human and machine is just wiring. Neuralink bridges it. Optimus provides hardware that outperforms biology in every metric. Robotic limb lifts ten times more. Reacts faster. Never tires. Never weakens. The replacement isn’t equivalent. It’s superior. Musk: “And again, you’d have basically Cybernetics Superpowers.” We’re not restoring function. We’re demonstrating that biology was the limitation. Once someone with Optimus limbs provably outperforms biological humans, injury stops being tragedy and becomes competitive edge. The amputee isn’t disadvantaged anymore. They’re enhanced. Stronger. Faster. More capable than intact humans beside them. That’s when everything inverts. Disability stops being disability when the replacement exceeds the original. And once performance gap becomes visible and measurable, keeping biological limbs becomes the handicap. Why biological arm strength when mechanical replacement lifts exponentially more? Why biological endurance when robotic systems don’t fatigue? Why accept limitations when alternatives eliminate them? The injured person with upgrades isn’t trying to reach normal. They surpassed it. And everyone still constrained by biology just became comparatively disabled. At that point, waiting for injury to get enhancement becomes irrational. People seek elective replacement. Functional biology gets swapped for superior mechanics because performance matters more than origin. Your body isn’t sacred. It’s legacy hardware running obsolete specifications. And when better hardware integrates seamlessly through neural interface, keeping the original stops being preservation and becomes self-imposed limitation. Neuralink plus Optimus doesn’t help the disabled catch up to the able-bodied. It makes the able-bodied obsolete. And once that’s obvious, once enhanced humans demonstrably outcompete biological ones, the question stops being whether we should upgrade and becomes how fast we can before everyone else does and we’re left behind operating with inferior equipment. The disabled aren’t getting fixed. They’re getting first access to the platform that makes everyone else obsolete. And biology’s reign as optimal human configuration just got an expiration date.

Dustin

76,633 views • 5 months ago