Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Never in my wildest imagination did I think I would be called into special session over Memorial Day weekend and have to argue that military members and their spouses deserve to have their votes counted after they already cast their ballots. But here we are. South Carolina is trying... to rush through new congressional maps while the election process is already underway. Military and overseas voters followed the rules. They requested their ballots. They voted. They sent them back. Now, because politicians want to change the maps at the last minute, those voters could have their ballots thrown out through no fault of their own. That is unacceptable. I have an amendment that says if the congressional primaries are moved to August, those military and overseas voters should automatically receive a new ballot for the new primary. That should not be controversial. But apparently, some folks are fighting me on it. Some days it feels like I am living in the upside down. It is Memorial Day weekend, and I am having to fight to protect the voting rights of the very people serving our country. If we say we support our veterans, our military members, and their families, then we should start by making sure their votes count. Standing strong. Holding the line.show more

Senator Ed Sutton

3,337 subscribers

214,553 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Здоровье и велнес

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

#WATCH | Jhajjar, Haryana: BJP State President Archana Gupta says, "... We have no intention of cutting anyone’s vote. But previously dead voters’ names were not removed, and later their votes were misused in some cases... Our only appeal is that voting rights must belong only to eligible Indian citizens. Only genuine voters should have the right to vote. We are only insisting that those who are alive and eligible should be recognised as voters, and only they should cast their vote."

#WATCH | Jhajjar, Haryana: BJP State President Archana Gupta says, "... We have no intention of cutting anyone’s vote. But previously dead voters’ names were not removed, and later their votes were misused in some cases... Our only appeal is that voting rights must belong only to eligible Indian citizens. Only genuine voters should have the right to vote. We are only insisting that those who are alive and eligible should be recognised as voters, and only they should cast their vote."

ANI

37,077 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Liz Wheeler

84,881 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.Congresswoman Jen Kiggans: To those playing politics with DHS funding: Our service members are overseas defending our nation—they shouldn't have to worry about the safety of their families at home. It is time to stop the games and unify to support our military and their families.

.Congresswoman Jen Kiggans: To those playing politics with DHS funding: Our service members are overseas defending our nation—they shouldn't have to worry about the safety of their families at home. It is time to stop the games and unify to support our military and their families.

House Republicans

23,457 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

PM MODI DESTROYS OPPOSITION 🔥 "If our media friends analyse, they will find that for some time now, this House has been used either for election warm-up or to vent frustration over defeat. I have seen some states where, after being in power, there is so much anti-incumbency that they are unable to reach out to the public. They are unable to express their views before the people, and so they vent all their anger in the House. And some parties have started a new trend of using the House for their state politics. Now they should reconsider the game they have been playing for the last 10 years, which the country is not accepting. They should at least change their methods and their strategies. I am ready to give them tips on how they should perform, but at least do not ignore the rights of MPs; give them the opportunity to express themselves..."

PM MODI DESTROYS OPPOSITION 🔥 "If our media friends analyse, they will find that for some time now, this House has been used either for election warm-up or to vent frustration over defeat. I have seen some states where, after being in power, there is so much anti-incumbency that they are unable to reach out to the public. They are unable to express their views before the people, and so they vent all their anger in the House. And some parties have started a new trend of using the House for their state politics. Now they should reconsider the game they have been playing for the last 10 years, which the country is not accepting. They should at least change their methods and their strategies. I am ready to give them tips on how they should perform, but at least do not ignore the rights of MPs; give them the opportunity to express themselves..."

Frontalforce 🇮🇳

16,174 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."

ANI

24,199 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Trump: "They have the ballots. That should be no problem, right? They have the ballots. FBI came in and raided. They found plenty of stuff. And now they have the ballots. And the Democrats are fighting like hell, and I think it goes before a judge tomorrow, to not let anybody see the ballots. Why don't they want them to see the ballots? Because they cheated like dogs."

Trump: "They have the ballots. That should be no problem, right? They have the ballots. FBI came in and raided. They found plenty of stuff. And now they have the ballots. And the Democrats are fighting like hell, and I think it goes before a judge tomorrow, to not let anybody see the ballots. Why don't they want them to see the ballots? Because they cheated like dogs."

Aaron Rupar

57,179 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: Karoline Leavitt says Iran is doing a lot of tough-talking but can't back ANY of it up "The Iranians are making a lot of threats with their words, but if you look at their actions with respect to their military, they're not as strong or powerful as they were 9 days ago!" 🔥 "That is for sure. We have completely wiped out their navy. Their navy is now deemed combat ineffective. Their retaliatory strikes with ballistic missiles has decreased 90 percent, and as their attacks are decreasing, the power and prowess of the U.S. military is increasing." "We are going to continue to completely obliterate the rogue Iranian regime and ensure that they can never possess a nuclear weapon, that their ballistic missiles can no longer threaten U.S. personnel and our assets in the region." "And the mere fact that Iran is now pointing their capabilities at their Gulf partners in the region, who have tried to remain neutral and at peace with them for many years, they're targeting civilians..." "...It just underscores the point that this operation was necessary, not just to protect the American people and our assets and troops and bases in the region, but also to ensure a truly safe and prosperous Middle East for the rest of the world." "And President Trump is the first president in nearly five decades to actually have the courage to do this, and he should be commended for it."

🚨 JUST IN: Karoline Leavitt says Iran is doing a lot of tough-talking but can't back ANY of it up "The Iranians are making a lot of threats with their words, but if you look at their actions with respect to their military, they're not as strong or powerful as they were 9 days ago!" 🔥 "That is for sure. We have completely wiped out their navy. Their navy is now deemed combat ineffective. Their retaliatory strikes with ballistic missiles has decreased 90 percent, and as their attacks are decreasing, the power and prowess of the U.S. military is increasing." "We are going to continue to completely obliterate the rogue Iranian regime and ensure that they can never possess a nuclear weapon, that their ballistic missiles can no longer threaten U.S. personnel and our assets in the region." "And the mere fact that Iran is now pointing their capabilities at their Gulf partners in the region, who have tried to remain neutral and at peace with them for many years, they're targeting civilians..." "...It just underscores the point that this operation was necessary, not just to protect the American people and our assets and troops and bases in the region, but also to ensure a truly safe and prosperous Middle East for the rest of the world." "And President Trump is the first president in nearly five decades to actually have the courage to do this, and he should be commended for it."

Eric Daugherty

84,735 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"In our country's governance, way of working, and politics, it is known and repeated every day by everyone, we all seem to agree that we must change our tragic history as Rwandans. We need to strengthen our governance structures, if you are elected to lead or appointed in other legal ways it is not just for people to occupy positions of leadership and think about themselves as the first thing, thinking that the benefits of their positions should start with just them, no. We should also benefit from our work and efforts as human beings, but in our responsibilities as leaders, we should first and foremost think about Rwandans. It is a terrible habit that never gets uprooted completed. There is something about positions, even in foreign languages people enjoy being called “VVIPs”; some people end up almost killing others because they don’t treat them as “VIPs”. People have become so full of themselves, so heavy, that if they pass by places and they don’t leave fear in their wake, do you know how a hurricane goes? If they don’t leave fear in their wake then it becomes a problem. They look back to check if they left a storm in their wake or if people had turned up in big numbers to praise them. This is definitely a bad habit. We have said many times that it should stop but I repeat it today and it should stop. If you want to feel important, I am not against you if that is who you are, but it should start with fulfilling your duties first. After you have completed your responsibilities, if you still feel important, I will leave you alone, it will not offend me, only that you are the one who will have to bear the consequences. Serving Rwandans is the most important thing and should be our first and foremost responsibility." President Kagame | Swearing-in of Prime Minister and New Members of Parliament.

"In our country's governance, way of working, and politics, it is known and repeated every day by everyone, we all seem to agree that we must change our tragic history as Rwandans. We need to strengthen our governance structures, if you are elected to lead or appointed in other legal ways it is not just for people to occupy positions of leadership and think about themselves as the first thing, thinking that the benefits of their positions should start with just them, no. We should also benefit from our work and efforts as human beings, but in our responsibilities as leaders, we should first and foremost think about Rwandans. It is a terrible habit that never gets uprooted completed. There is something about positions, even in foreign languages people enjoy being called “VVIPs”; some people end up almost killing others because they don’t treat them as “VIPs”. People have become so full of themselves, so heavy, that if they pass by places and they don’t leave fear in their wake, do you know how a hurricane goes? If they don’t leave fear in their wake then it becomes a problem. They look back to check if they left a storm in their wake or if people had turned up in big numbers to praise them. This is definitely a bad habit. We have said many times that it should stop but I repeat it today and it should stop. If you want to feel important, I am not against you if that is who you are, but it should start with fulfilling your duties first. After you have completed your responsibilities, if you still feel important, I will leave you alone, it will not offend me, only that you are the one who will have to bear the consequences. Serving Rwandans is the most important thing and should be our first and foremost responsibility." President Kagame | Swearing-in of Prime Minister and New Members of Parliament.

Presidency | Rwanda

63,048 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.James Talarico: The reason Democrats lost support in South Texas and among Hispanic voters is because we took them for granted. We assumed they were a part of our base and we stopped showing up. We stopped competing for their votes. I went down to the valley a ton and I listened. I heard their concerns primarily about costs. It's this cost of living crisis that's crushing people all over the state, but especially folks in South Texas. You have to ask for someone's vote. You have to earn their vote. I think showing up and listening is half the battle in politics. It's what our party should do a better job of among all communities.

.James Talarico: The reason Democrats lost support in South Texas and among Hispanic voters is because we took them for granted. We assumed they were a part of our base and we stopped showing up. We stopped competing for their votes. I went down to the valley a ton and I listened. I heard their concerns primarily about costs. It's this cost of living crisis that's crushing people all over the state, but especially folks in South Texas. You have to ask for someone's vote. You have to earn their vote. I think showing up and listening is half the battle in politics. It's what our party should do a better job of among all communities.

Team Talarico

20,804 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Graham Stuart, MP for Beverley and Holderness delivers a great speech in the parliamentary inheritance tax on family farms debate: It is possible to challenge one’s Government. I said to my Whips then that the best service we could do the Government was to prevent them from doing something stupid, harmful and alienating to voters. I hope that Government Members can see that, because the Opposition cannot change this. People outside say to me, “Can we get this changed?” It is actually up to Labour MPs. They have the majority. Democracy is not about having a majority and doing what one likes. Democracy is about listening and doing what the now Prime Minister told the NFU when he said: “You deserve a Government that listens, that heeds early warnings”. There are one or two warnings about. Listen, change: if the Government change, four years on, no one will remember the U-turn. Whatever civil servants say—they are always very keen to stick with a policy—if it is wrong, stop doing it. And this is wrong. In the minute and 20 seconds I have left, let me say why it is so wrong. We have touched on the various elements, but I am not sure we have pulled it all together. We have a really peculiar group of businesspeople in this country; they are called farmers. They take a return on capital—the millions they have invested in their farms—that is typically less than 1%. There is nobody that I am aware of—no business I was ever involved in—that would remotely consider continuing in an industry that paid less than 1%. These farmers take a pittance and get up at 4 o’clock in the morning for the privilege. They look after the animals and it does not matter if they are ill; they cannot carry their employment rights and go, “I’m not well, I shouldn’t have to go out,” because the cows do not care: they have to go out and look after them, and then they get less than 1% return. Those farmers, the most beneficent public-minded businesspeople in the whole country, then provide excellent food at among the lowest prices in Europe. If ever there were a business that we would not want to go and mess with, it is these—I should not say it, because I will make enemies of them. We must understand how remarkable it is that there is a whole group of businesspeople who take practically nothing from their business, work all the hours God gives, and provide us with some of the finest food in the world at among the lowest prices in Europe. Why would we want to mess with that? Not only do they do that, but they brainwash their children from the earliest age so that they carry on doing it. These people are in indentured service to the nation, providing food while making very little profit. They do it willingly and, in fact, love it: it is their life. To go and mess with them out of some stupid, socialist spite is ridiculous and absurd, and Government Members know that—the hon. Member for North Northumberland certainly does, and he should lead his colleagues to tell the Chancellor to change course, just as we did in 2012 when George Osborne got it wrong.”

Graham Stuart, MP for Beverley and Holderness delivers a great speech in the parliamentary inheritance tax on family farms debate: It is possible to challenge one’s Government. I said to my Whips then that the best service we could do the Government was to prevent them from doing something stupid, harmful and alienating to voters. I hope that Government Members can see that, because the Opposition cannot change this. People outside say to me, “Can we get this changed?” It is actually up to Labour MPs. They have the majority. Democracy is not about having a majority and doing what one likes. Democracy is about listening and doing what the now Prime Minister told the NFU when he said: “You deserve a Government that listens, that heeds early warnings”. There are one or two warnings about. Listen, change: if the Government change, four years on, no one will remember the U-turn. Whatever civil servants say—they are always very keen to stick with a policy—if it is wrong, stop doing it. And this is wrong. In the minute and 20 seconds I have left, let me say why it is so wrong. We have touched on the various elements, but I am not sure we have pulled it all together. We have a really peculiar group of businesspeople in this country; they are called farmers. They take a return on capital—the millions they have invested in their farms—that is typically less than 1%. There is nobody that I am aware of—no business I was ever involved in—that would remotely consider continuing in an industry that paid less than 1%. These farmers take a pittance and get up at 4 o’clock in the morning for the privilege. They look after the animals and it does not matter if they are ill; they cannot carry their employment rights and go, “I’m not well, I shouldn’t have to go out,” because the cows do not care: they have to go out and look after them, and then they get less than 1% return. Those farmers, the most beneficent public-minded businesspeople in the whole country, then provide excellent food at among the lowest prices in Europe. If ever there were a business that we would not want to go and mess with, it is these—I should not say it, because I will make enemies of them. We must understand how remarkable it is that there is a whole group of businesspeople who take practically nothing from their business, work all the hours God gives, and provide us with some of the finest food in the world at among the lowest prices in Europe. Why would we want to mess with that? Not only do they do that, but they brainwash their children from the earliest age so that they carry on doing it. These people are in indentured service to the nation, providing food while making very little profit. They do it willingly and, in fact, love it: it is their life. To go and mess with them out of some stupid, socialist spite is ridiculous and absurd, and Government Members know that—the hon. Member for North Northumberland certainly does, and he should lead his colleagues to tell the Chancellor to change course, just as we did in 2012 when George Osborne got it wrong.”

No Farmers, No Food

115,996 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 SEC. MARCO RUBIO DELIVERS THIS REMARK FOR FALLEN US TROOPS: "These are HEROES, that pay the ultimate price." "We take for granted, that our military is so effective — but the mission they carry out is very, very dangerous. And so we lost people in Jordan after there was a strike. A missile got through, we shot down almost all the missiles one made it through, hit the wrong place." "It's heartbreaking and our hearts go out to these families." "We also lost the service member in Iraq unrelated to combat they were e decommissioning a munition and an accident happened in that process — and they were harmed." "Our military all over the world, especially in that part of the world, but all over the world, every single day, do very dangerous things." "We've had people who lost their lives in training missions. Nothing the military does is safe — it's all inherently dangerous, and we're just grateful to have such heroic Americans in uniform in the service of our country." "We're praying for their families and praying for their souls and we are grateful that we have people like that serving us — both those who we have lost and those who at this very moment are on the watch and defending our interests around the world." 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

🚨 SEC. MARCO RUBIO DELIVERS THIS REMARK FOR FALLEN US TROOPS: "These are HEROES, that pay the ultimate price." "We take for granted, that our military is so effective — but the mission they carry out is very, very dangerous. And so we lost people in Jordan after there was a strike. A missile got through, we shot down almost all the missiles one made it through, hit the wrong place." "It's heartbreaking and our hearts go out to these families." "We also lost the service member in Iraq unrelated to combat they were e decommissioning a munition and an accident happened in that process — and they were harmed." "Our military all over the world, especially in that part of the world, but all over the world, every single day, do very dangerous things." "We've had people who lost their lives in training missions. Nothing the military does is safe — it's all inherently dangerous, and we're just grateful to have such heroic Americans in uniform in the service of our country." "We're praying for their families and praying for their souls and we are grateful that we have people like that serving us — both those who we have lost and those who at this very moment are on the watch and defending our interests around the world." 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

88,153 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Rep. Wesley Hunt Calls For MASS DEPORTATIONS to Continue After the Horrific Islamic Mass Shooting in Texas: "These are the consequences of having 20 million people in our country over the four years and we have no idea who they are. We have no idea where they went. We have no idea what their intentions are in this country. Which is why having a secure border is very important." "We didn't even need any more laws, no resolutions. We simply needed a new president to enforce the laws on the books." "We are now in a different phase of this. This is why we have to empower ICE so they could do their jobs. So they can find these people and send them and get them the hell out of this country. Send them back home." "I am an American that has babies here and I want to make sure that we keep our citizens safe." "You shouldn't be at a bar in Austin and be worried about getting shot up by a terrorist." "We should know every single person who was here. We should know every single terrorist that enters our country. We need to find them. We need to round them up and we need to send them back."

Rep. Wesley Hunt Calls For MASS DEPORTATIONS to Continue After the Horrific Islamic Mass Shooting in Texas: "These are the consequences of having 20 million people in our country over the four years and we have no idea who they are. We have no idea where they went. We have no idea what their intentions are in this country. Which is why having a secure border is very important." "We didn't even need any more laws, no resolutions. We simply needed a new president to enforce the laws on the books." "We are now in a different phase of this. This is why we have to empower ICE so they could do their jobs. So they can find these people and send them and get them the hell out of this country. Send them back home." "I am an American that has babies here and I want to make sure that we keep our citizens safe." "You shouldn't be at a bar in Austin and be worried about getting shot up by a terrorist." "We should know every single person who was here. We should know every single terrorist that enters our country. We need to find them. We need to round them up and we need to send them back."

Benny Johnson

91,130 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Tim Dillon: “The FBI already probably watches this show.” “Now they’re really gonna watch it … ” “I can imagine a world where we have homegrown terrorists that start to attack data centers … as people resist their own extermination.” “Let me be very clear to the federal government.” “I am not for people trying to fight their own extermination.” “They should walk into extinction quietly.” “I’m saying this for the federal government right now … for JD and Thiel.” “I would never want to see a beautiful data center maimed by any of these sick people.” “I believe people need to accept their fate … that they are simply not needed.” “Their right to exist, their right to autonomy, their right to freedom, their right to water or whatever, what even is that?” “Is that in the Constitution?” “I think not.” “In the Bill of Rights, you have the right to water?” “I think not.” “Like all the tech people, I believe that the best way forward is to exterminate the human race.” Tim Dillon

Tim Dillon: “The FBI already probably watches this show.” “Now they’re really gonna watch it … ” “I can imagine a world where we have homegrown terrorists that start to attack data centers … as people resist their own extermination.” “Let me be very clear to the federal government.” “I am not for people trying to fight their own extermination.” “They should walk into extinction quietly.” “I’m saying this for the federal government right now … for JD and Thiel.” “I would never want to see a beautiful data center maimed by any of these sick people.” “I believe people need to accept their fate … that they are simply not needed.” “Their right to exist, their right to autonomy, their right to freedom, their right to water or whatever, what even is that?” “Is that in the Constitution?” “I think not.” “In the Bill of Rights, you have the right to water?” “I think not.” “Like all the tech people, I believe that the best way forward is to exterminate the human race.” Tim Dillon

Holden Culotta

396,117 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Military Veteran on the Rise in Socialism/Communism: “I think that voters are not going to reject it because they have no idea what communism is. My family lived… their whole lives were under communism. And I blame the colleges. The colleges and the school system don’t teach these kids what communism [is] where we are. How we became a country as what we are today.”

Military Veteran on the Rise in Socialism/Communism: “I think that voters are not going to reject it because they have no idea what communism is. My family lived… their whole lives were under communism. And I blame the colleges. The colleges and the school system don’t teach these kids what communism [is] where we are. How we became a country as what we are today.”

RedWave Press

157,730 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: 29 States could see their laws allowing mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day OVERTURNED by the Supreme Court. This would be a massive win for election integrity JUSTICE ALITO: "Independence Day, birthday, and Election Day. They are all particular DAYS. So if we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase 'Election Day,' I think this is the DAY in which everything is going to take place."

BREAKING: 29 States could see their laws allowing mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day OVERTURNED by the Supreme Court. This would be a massive win for election integrity JUSTICE ALITO: "Independence Day, birthday, and Election Day. They are all particular DAYS. So if we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase 'Election Day,' I think this is the DAY in which everything is going to take place."

Benny Johnson

463,827 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад