Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Never wrong, just early🧏🏾♂️
278,038 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)
34 Comments

Anyone with common sense that read the facts of the case will see that the entire story didn’t make sense and it was held together by speculation that even the government report didn’t agree with!

You all insulting her are literally seeing the court video, yet you refused to use your tiny, washed up brains to comprehend. There was no freaking investigation. That woman did not kill her children. Her husband did and framed her, and the stupid police just sided with him

Exactly! Most of them relied on what Patrick said! They didn’t even conduct thorough investigation

Exactlyyy. Anyone disputing this glaring facts is intentionally obtuse. She didn't do it. Everything was based on what Patrick ' saw' and 'heard'

Did you even understand what you just posted? Defence attorney doing exactly what he’s expected to do(create doubt) and you’re talking like he’s the Judge of the case.

There is cctv camera showing him at the pharmacy and the restutant Are u people stupid

I see where you're coming from and I can also see that you're infact very foolish

the thing about you is that you can be an intelligent person but you seemingly use 90% of your time to portray stupidity, idk it could be rage bait but regardless this tweet portrays a ridiculous amount of stupidity

@CommunityNotes you need to fix up that nonsense you wrote

I don't think you even understood what you watched. The Counsel is making an argument in defence of his client that she doesn't recollect doing it and her admission is based on what she was TOLD. He's not implying that the Husband did it. Besides, the husband has an alibi.

Investigation being sloppy raises an eye brow but let’s not be obtuse Abeg, we have lawyers that have won similar cases where their clients were infact guilty. When Patrick’s lawyer starts spitting some of his own findings, make sure you keep this same energy

Your ego man, chai.

Ask your lawyer friends to explain to you what circumstantial evidence is and how damning it can be ☕

I’m so happy he said this. There was legit zero investigation into this case

You’re intelligent than this takes

“Omo, this girl Dey ragebait gan…..I Dey come”😂😭

during the initial trial reddington asked for bifurcation of the case ie he asked for it to be divided into two 1..she didn't do it(not guilty) 2..if she even did it(not guilty due to reason of insanity) Now the judge rejected that because of how connected and complex the case was with these two reasons and allowed it go on as one trial...Reddington agreed to this because he knew it was easier to prove NGRI and it actually was(convinced 9 jurors out of 12 outright to NGRI) IF he was so sure that she didn't do it he would have argued for not guilty right from the start...he has even stipulated that she did it during the court hearings, lindseys civil lawsuit said she did it ,however sha him bringing all these up is still valid cuz the CW has not yet proved beyond reasonable doubt that she did it cuz there are actual inconsistencies in the timeline.....but cmon Patrick didn't do it.she did it and the prosecution should do a better job and the investigations should be properly done too

Is he the judge? First case was up prove criminal responsibility which led to a mistrial. No defense is trying to create total doubt, it's a simply court tactic that you can find anywhere. Is he the judge saying all this? Prosecution will have thier point to counter his argument

I love as the community note is under your tweet. You dull frustrated feminist.

rage bait

The case was poorly investigated, everyone could see the timeline was off but nobody cared to properly investigate, a lot of time has passed, a lot loose ends from Patrick can no longer be well investigated. Very annoying mistrial, with her just repeating what Patrick told her

You choose to be like this intentionally or you were born out of spite?

my goodness.

She said ‘anyone with common sense’😭😭😭😭

You be idiot, this is her attorney trying to argue based on technicality. Is this the final judgement?

fgs how dumb can you be this woman already admitted that she did it there was evidence that she did haba !

You are the most delusional person I have ever seen in my entire life, you are yet to change. So sad, that the older you get the more your hate for men increases that you cannot judge a situation independent of your hate for men...Ore the same yesterday, today and tomorrow

You too mumu 😂 That's her defender council talking of course what do U want the defender hired to save her to say? Also before I forget you been consistently foolish since I joined twitter Fool D'or

Getting facts from twitter. Down slab feminist bigots are really winning these daysb

Goodluck to you and yours

Mehn this lady is deranged 😳

RAGE BAIT....The kids you would give birth to one day will come across this tweet and know the kind of monster they have as a mom

You Dey try rage bait me.

You’re stupidity has to be internally exclusive to prolly your dna. Cause what form of thought creation is this?
Related Videos
Sensitive content
🧏🏾♂️🧏🏾♂️🧏🏾♂️
𝐌𝐨𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐝 🇸🇳
50,862 views • 2 months ago
