Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

NEW ANGLE! A new, courtside angle shows that Jackie Young, did, actually, poke Cecilia Zandalasini in the eye 👀👆 Previous broadcast angles showed Zandalasini appearing to flop, but, the courtside angle confirmed the contact. Thoughts? 🤔

22,011 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

31 Comments

Will morse's profile picture
Will morse3 days ago

A new court side angle actually shows you are full of shit. She never got touched. Nothing was confirmed, you bitches need to learn about depth of field before posting bullshit narratives, depth perception is clear, never touched.

John Gallagher's profile picture
John Gallagher3 days ago

Match that up with the side angle video from her reaction backwards. You will see her hand did not come close to her face.

JC's profile picture
JC3 days ago

The amount of people still saying "this angle doesn't show it!" is fucking crazy. Are you all blind or retarded? I'm fine if you wanna argue whether this angle is AI, because I honestly couldn't tell if it was, but this clearly shows a finger digging up into her eye socket.

Michael's profile picture
Michael3 days ago

baltringue !!

Kevin's profile picture
Kevin3 days ago

That's not a poke in the eye 💀

MSG's profile picture
MSG3 days ago

No it does not. What you see from this angle is much like you'd see a punch in the movies. It appears as if there is contact, but the other angles show it wasn't even close. Study your own video a little more and maybe you will see.

Signor Smith's profile picture
Signor Smith3 days ago

It was clear, if you only had seen the match live.

Parry Breaker's profile picture
Parry Breaker3 days ago

We’re use to poor officiating and missed calls in the U.S. It’s part of the game.

chris poyner's profile picture
chris poyner3 days ago

This is the bad angle and it isn’t clear the other angles are clear. LeBron James school of flopping would be proud.

L's profile picture
L3 days ago

No it doesn’t 🤣🤣

Luke's profile picture
Luke3 days ago

You should be ashamed! You defamed an athlete for nothing! Shame on you!

Signor Smith's profile picture
Signor Smith3 days ago

The angle has nothing to do with your post. You just posted a video without the poke. It was your choice. And it was damn wrong. You should apologise with @ceciznd.

Linda Yaworski's profile picture
Linda Yaworski3 days ago

It’s too late games over with! Get over it!

22's profile picture
223 days ago

Some WNBA players do that shit on a regular basis. They should have their f*cking fingers broken.

Dyords's profile picture
Dyords3 days ago

WNBA mediocres are dirty players. Poking the eyes is of their favorite weapon.

eyes open!'s profile picture
eyes open!3 days ago

New AI courtside? Because the video clearly showed her 2 feet away from her when she raised her hands up. It’s quite embarrassing so it doesn’t matter what angle you see it from though she was still 2 feet away from her..

@joe_jammer540's profile picture
@joe_jammer5403 days ago

Show other views!

kenneth ochoa's profile picture
kenneth ochoa3 days ago

cheaters never prosper so we know usa teams love to rough house. which is illegal in a non contact sport 🥸

BT_atBat's profile picture
BT_atBat3 days ago

So much so that she apologized for faking it and there are actual game cameras showing the action and it being faked.

James 's profile picture
James 3 days ago

Need side angle Hi-Res view to confirm. Either way, during the old days, you are taught to play on unless you hear a whistle. But unfortunately some NBA top players have left the legacy and taught the new generation to sell the foul or flop and then complain and whine incessantly

Danny Ray's profile picture
Danny Ray3 days ago

Because u chose not to show the whole video…

Crow's profile picture
Crow3 days ago

There should be video reviews for something like this

Herbert Whitehouse's profile picture
Herbert Whitehouse3 days ago

@JackieYoung3.

Kenneth Dias's profile picture
Kenneth Dias3 days ago

The angle that doesn’t show the space between the face and hand.

Rocco Frisoli's profile picture
Rocco Frisoli3 days ago

New angle makes it look like that, but apparently you don’t understand angles. The other angle shows she barely got within a foot of her eye.

questwho's profile picture
questwho3 days ago

Better yet, how about this one?

SDMAGA's profile picture
SDMAGA3 days ago

Using an AI picture to argue this is insane. Good lord, just look at the picture. Now take your finger and push the corner of your eye. Can you get that much skin to fold over?

GeoXP's profile picture
GeoXP3 days ago

AI generated.

Reiner Gehret's profile picture
Reiner Gehret3 days ago

Professional foul: rebound the hand from the eye to the ceiling.

Quad Aces's profile picture
Quad Aces3 days ago

Give it a rest. Maybe the refs missed it. It happens all of the time.

NoDu Fox II's profile picture
NoDu Fox II3 days ago

Why didn’t the US player just come out and say it? “Yeah I inadvertently poked her in the eye” The End

Related Videos

Fernando Tatis Jr is hitting .242 with a 3.5° average launch angle and a career-low 20% pull rate. Everyone has ideas and analysis on how to fix Fernando Tatis Jr’s swing. It’s pretty awful and I can’t take anymore of this, I have to say something because I haven’t seen a single person give the right answer. I’ve seen multiple people talk about timing mechanisms like toe tap, stride, and leg lift in his swing mechanics that have absolutely nothing to do with his problem. That reverting to past timing mechanisms would somehow help him. THEY ARE ALL WRONG Because they’re all looking in the wrong place. This isn’t a stride problem or timing problem. It’s a tilt problem. Stride, leg lift, and toe tap are timing mechanisms. They control WHEN the hips fire not HOW the bat moves through the zone. A hitter with a Sosa leg kick and a no-stride Ichiro stance can produce identical launch angles.Timing has no lever that touches the bat at contact. What actually sets launch angle is attack angle or the vertical direction the bat is traveling at the moment it meets the ball. Swing up through the zone = ball lifts Swing flat = grounders Swing down = choppers Attack angle is the only mechanical input that matters for elevation and attack angle isn’t random. It’s a direct output of shoulder tilt. When the trail shoulder drops below the lead shoulder at contact, the entire swing axis tilts. The bat is now forced to travel upward through the zone. More tilt > steeper attack angle > higher launch angle. Period. Tatis’s attack angle tells the entire story: 2023: +12° attack angle, +1° pull-side direction/25 HRs 2024 : +10° attack angle. -2° oppo direction 21HRs in 104 games 2025: +8° attack angle, 0° direction/25 HRs, healthy 2026: +5° attack angle, −5° oppo direction His swing has flattened AND drifted away from his pull side. Both are tilt collapse. That −5° oppo attack direction is the giveaway. When you lose tilt, your bat doesn’t just flatten it also gets steered toward the opposite field, because a level swing naturally pushes the barrel away from your pull side. He’s not late. He’s not under-striding. His axis collapsed Over the last few years and it’s worse than ever this year. This explains the 20% pull air rate too. Pulling the ball in the air requires positive attack angle AND a contact point out front. (Ramon Laureanos 2025 attack Angle was +14) If you tinker with timing on a flat swing, an earlier contact point just produces a pull-side grounder. The direction changes. The launch angle does not. Let me break it down for you: Stride > Weight Shift > Hip Rotation >TILT > ATTACK ANGLE > BAT PATH > Contact > Launch Angle Stride is four steps upstream. Tilt is the gate. Attack angle is the output that actually moves the ball. So now we know what’s wrong, how do we fix him? Souza and the Padres staff need to focus on the following; 1.Restore 8–12° rear-high shoulder tilt 2.Get attack angle back to +10° to +12° with neutral or +1° pull direction 3.THEN evaluate timing tweaks 4. If someone is telling him to flatten out his swing or to let the ball travel more PLEASE STOP DOING THAT. That doesn’t work for him You cannot time your way to elevation. Fix the tilt. Attack angle returns. Pull air follows. Please watch the video to see how his swing has gotten worse and flatter. We only have bat path data starting in 2023

Mission Valley Mafia

160,950 views • 4 months ago

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.

MJTruthUltra

10,665,164 views • 11 months ago