Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨NEW @ASTSpaceOdyssey PODCAST 🛰️ 🧠Tech Talk with C🅰️tSE 🚀Comparing $ASTS Vs Starlink 🌌Technical Use Cases 🔒Golden Dome & More

191,229 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von $ASTS Sp🅰️ceMob
$ASTS Sp🅰️ceMobvor 1 Jahr

On other platforms at:

Profilbild von CyclingNinj🅰️
CyclingNinj🅰️vor 1 Jahr

@ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ I posted a summary. Thank you guys for the awesome work!

Profilbild von 🅰️ST Space Odyssey Podcast
🅰️ST Space Odyssey Podcastvor 1 Jahr

@CatSE___ApeX___ 🚀🅰️🛰️📲

Profilbild von 🅰️wesome_Beast
🅰️wesome_Beastvor 1 Jahr

@The_SPACTATOR @ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ Thank you guys for doing this . Appreciate it 🙏

Profilbild von Kelly Ghormley - 🅰️Z
Kelly Ghormley - 🅰️Zvor 1 Jahr

@ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ Really, really great podcast. Thank you both! Listened to it again on the plane. Super bullish!

Profilbild von Andras N
Andras Nvor 1 Jahr

@ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ This is huge guys!

Profilbild von Uh🅰️tta
Uh🅰️ttavor 1 Jahr

@ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ Thank you @ASTSpaceOdyssey and @CatSE___ApeX___

Profilbild von Elish🅰️
Elish🅰️vor 1 Jahr

@ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ 👏👏👏

Profilbild von PharmD🅰️z
PharmD🅰️zvor 1 Jahr

@ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ @grimmly26 @Philly_Manilly_

Profilbild von Kelly Ghormley - 🅰️Z
Kelly Ghormley - 🅰️Zvor 1 Jahr

@ASTSpaceOdyssey @CatSE___ApeX___ 🔥🔥🔥

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Ep. 45 of Tokenized Podcast: The Stablecoin Playbook for TradFi Simon Taylor & Cuy Sheffield are joined by: ➡️ Sam Broner, Partner a16z crypto To discuss: 📖 A New Playbook for TradFi: Multi-chain vs own chain 🧾 Merchant role in payments ecosystem and fee pressures 🦊 Metamask MUSD as a store of value product ⏳️ Timeline for stablecoin and chain abstraction interoperability 🇨🇳 China's potential Yuan-backed stablecoin response to US dominance 🧠 Market reaction to the Genesis Bill and Tether 🔒 Privacy solutions and their role in stablecoin adoption ⚠️ Challenges for large financial institutions adopting stablecoins 💡 Bullish IPO's watershed moment for stablecoin treasury use *** Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 03:02 A New Playbook for TradFi: Multi-chain vs own chain 09:43 Merchant role in payments ecosystem and fee pressures 14:53 Metamask MUSD as a store of value product 17:51 Timeline for stablecoin and chain abstraction interoperability 21:52 China's potential Yuan-backed stablecoin response to US dominance 27:57 Market reaction to the Genesis Bill and Tether 32:12 Privacy solutions and their role in stablecoin adoption 38:59 Challenges for large financial institutions adopting stablecoins 46:06 Bullish IPO's watershed moment for stablecoin treasury use *** 👉𝘚𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 '𝘛𝘰𝘬𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘗𝘰𝘥𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵' 𝘖𝘯 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘛𝘶𝘣𝘦. 𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘦, 𝘚𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘺 𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘗𝘰𝘥𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘗𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳! 👈

Tokenized Podcast

18,199 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚀 NEW EPISODE 🚀 Scaling the Agentic Internet Friederike Ernst 🦉 chats with Bowen Wang, Head of Protocol @ Near One, about blockchain scaling, AI, and how NEAR Protocol sets the ground for AI-native apps & the agentic economy. ‘Attention Is All You Need’, co-wrote by Illia Polosukhin in 2017, laid the foundation for arguably one of the most consequential tech breakthroughs in our recent history. 1 year later, Illia founded Near AI, which later became NEAR Protocol. They were visionaries ahead of their time and, although AI took several more years before becoming a viable product, the experience of scaling databases would later prove valuable and applicable in blockchain world. As a result, NEAR Protocol is one of the first blockchains to implement execution layer sharding, asynchronous execution and stateless validation, bringing the finality time down to 1.2 seconds, with a block time of 0.6 seconds. Don't forget to RT & follow Epicenter Podcast! Topics discussed in this episode: 0:00 - Introduction 3:30 - Bowen’s background 4:47 - Near’s pivot from AI to blockchains 8:26 - The role of Near One 9:13 - Near’s tech stack upgrades 13:39 - Optimizing network architecture 17:08 - Stateless validation & block propagation 21:10 - Sharding & asynchronous execution 29:12 - Message passing between shards & shard ‘equality’ 35:51 - Challenges of implementing stateless validation 41:05 - Applications benefiting from Near’s finality speed 44:18 - Intent-based infrastructure 47:10 - AI use cases on Near 52:27 - Expanding Near’s ecosystem 54:43 - Development challenges 57:55 - Near’s vision and goals

Epicenter Podcast

66,601 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨ZHERKA x CLAVICULAR FULL CALL PT. 2 👀🔥 Topics: (0:00) Opening + Airport Call + Fake Drug Story (0:27) Cocaine Risks + Heart Attack Talk (0:58) BDO, Alcohol, and Lethal Dose (1:26) Ketamine, BDNF, and Cognitive Effects (2:25) Therapeutic Use vs Abuse (4:02) Why He Says Not to Do Drugs (4:31) Using Stimulants for Streaming (5:00) Addiction, Willpower, and Audience Influence (6:03) Adderall Era + Building Content (6:29) Daily Use vs Going Hard (7:32) Dopamine from Clips vs Real Life (8:06) Content vs Girls (8:36) Lifestyle, Girls, and Routine (9:28) Grace, Age, and Learning Experience (10:38) Intentions from the Start (11:22) Situation with Girls + Setup (11:49) Genetics, Attraction, and “Genetics Pill” (12:18) Why His Life Doesn’t Apply to Most People (13:04) Clip Farming Strategy (13:30) OnlyFans, Genetics, and Concerns (14:13) Kids, Legacy, and Future Planning (14:42) Building an Empire Through Family (15:22) IGF-1, Growth, and Planning Kids (16:04) Height, Frame, and Physical Traits (16:30) Genetics vs Luck Between Siblings (16:57) Parenting for Optimization (17:24) Gym at a Young Age Debate (17:54) Testosterone Use + Cycles (18:21) Compounds, Confidence, and Behavior (18:52) Yohimbine and Anxiety (19:31) Pre-workout and Supplements (20:00) Testosterone vs DHT (20:33) Estrogen, Collagen, and Skin (21:01) Looks, Models, and Face Optimization (21:32) TRT vs Higher Doses (22:02) DHT Blockers and Aging (22:35) What Actually Ages You (UV, Alcohol, Stress) (23:12) Stress vs Physical Aging Debate (23:46) Hair Loss Prevention + New Tech (24:12) Looksmaxing in 2026 (24:40) Status, Money, and Looks (25:20) Ascending Through Looks (25:36) Bottom Tier Reality (26:06) Money Maxing vs Attraction (26:38) Coming Out to Miami + Linking Up (27:09) Taking Over the Stream + Episode Plans (27:46) Rating Girls + “Trying to Help” (28:42) Watching His Content + Strategy (29:14) Running Streams While Working (29:50) Viral Content vs Personal Fulfillment

ZHERKA DAILY

30,495 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Good morning friends, please watch this demo then think about it 🧠🧠🧠 STORE vs Solana vs Eigen ————————— I think STORE has potential to be three things in one, "raising the bar”: a. Being integrated from the hardware layer up, a network of optimized datacenters, consensus can happen in parallel and applications can execute most loads at web2 cloud speed. b. A hardware-integrated protocol focussed on functioning as the traditional cloud from a deployment, (multicurrency cross-chain) billing, and tax perspective. It's becomes more programmable due to direct chain integrations and traditional cloud API endpoints, opening new possibilities for asset creation by mixing the best of both worlds. c. Various chain integrations are possible, aside from the native chain where data can viably live in a trust-minimized environment. This contrasts with offloading storage off-chain with only a hash, where the actual data could get compromised. Where Solana aims to be a verifiable blockchain and Eigen a verifiable network of roll-ups, STORE is the verifiable high-performance cloud. This approach aims to bridge the gap between traditional cloud computing and blockchain tech, realizing verifiability at the cloud infrastructure level. This means to effectively commoditize programmable energy, compute and data, potentially enabling human-AI collaboration and ownership on a different level. Did I mention consensus is leaderless?! Good things take time. STORE // is working on this. Full disclosure: I hold STORE tokens. I'm not paid to say this; I'm a long-time investor. My skin here is significant. Institutional investors might want to take note. They are raising funds. Don’t sleep on this one. Technical demo link

//Bitcoin 𝕵ack 🐐

729,489 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Starlink shutdown exposes Russia’s military dependence Russia’s dependence on American technology shatters the Kremlin’s invincibility narrative, leading to a slowdown in advance on the front. Claims of Russia’s invincibility became a central element of the large-scale invasion of Ukraine as we examined in our recent article. Faith in the greatness and self-sufficiency of the Russian army has been turned into a mantra of Kremlin propaganda. However, the war against Ukraine has shown the world that this narrative, like the myth of Russia’s technical superiority(opens in a new tab) over Western weapons and technology, is far from the truth. The recent disconnection of Russian troops from the Starlink satellite communications system vividly confirms this. The Russian troops have been left unable to coordinate, slowing down their advance and leaving space for Ukraine to push back. Blind and deaf In early February 2026, Russian troops in the occupied Ukrainian territories faced an unexpected disaster. Overnight, the Starlink satellite communications system crashed(opens in a new tab) across the entire front line. Meanwhile, official communications stations operated by the Ukrainian defence forces continued to operate without interruption. The Russian suffered a severe blow, leaving the invading forces cut off from command posts. The disruption of Russian army Starlink terminals caused serious problems with inter‑unit coordination, logistics and the use of drones of various types, both ground‑based and aerial. According to the Institute for the Study of War(opens in a new tab), the blocking of unregistered Starlink terminals significantly complicated Russian military operations and limited their ability to carry out tactical strikes, consequently leading towards the slowest advance in two years. Opportunity for Ukraine Putting on a brave face, the Russian FIMI machine reverted to its familiar tactic of denying reality. Kremlin mouthpieces claimed(opens in a new tab) that troop command and control remained stable thanks to a complex and diversified communications network. Russian military leaders insisted(opens in a new tab) there were no losses and that the army was not dependent on Western communications terminals. Some Russian units, the General Staff asserted, had allegedly used Starlink terminals solely to mislead Ukrainian forces. The reality proved otherwise: ‘All we’ve got left now, are radios, cables and pigeons,’ says a Russian soldier in an intercepted transmission cited in Politico’s(opens in a new tab) reporting. Without reliable communications, Russian troops lost the ability to effectively control drones and maintain defensive positions. According to Ukrainian Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi, Ukraine seized this opportunity(opens in a new tab). Within weeks, Ukrainian defence forces liberated eight settlements and more than 400 square kilometres of territory, taking advantage of the collapse of Russian command and communications. In February 2026, for the first time since the Kursk Offensive, the Ukrainian Defence Forces regained control of more territory(opens in a new tab) than Russia had managed to capture. The Ukrainian offensive continues, as do the Russian army’s communications problems. Russia’s own Starlink? Currently, Russian military correspondents and analysts are actively promoting a familiar narrative, urging battlefield units to remain patient until the Russian army’s alleged invulnerability is restored. Officials have also claimed that Russia is preparing to develop the Rassvet satellite constellation(opens in a new tab), presented as an analogue to Starlink and described as superior to existing systems. According to official statements(opens in a new tab), the first satellites are expected to be launched into low Earth orbit as early as the first quarter of 2026. The Kremlin’s experts further claim(opens in a new tab) that the initial objective is to deploy at least 300 satellites, with the constellation eventually expanding to up to 950 satellites. As recently as January 2026, Russian outlets quietly reported(opens in a new tab) that the launch of the first 16 experimental low‑orbit satellites had been postponed indefinitely. The satellites had originally been scheduled(opens in a new tab) for deployment in 2025, with official plans envisioning 156 satellites in orbit by 2026. Instead, delays and production shortfalls continue to push the timeline further back. Meanwhile, Moscow has been promising(opens in a new tab) a rapid build-up of its own broadband constellation since 2023, including frequent rocket launches carrying dozens of satellites. In reality, progress has stalled(opens in a new tab): only a handful of experimental satellites are currently in orbit, and experts remain sceptical(opens in a new tab) that Russia can deploy a functioning network anytime soon. The ‘Russian Starlink’ is beginning to look less like an imminent breakthrough and more like another technological promise that is quietly unravelling. The fall of the myth of technological superiority While the Kremlin’s propaganda machine continues to paint a rosy picture for Russian communications specialists, Russia currently lacks a fully fledged replacement for Starlink, and none is expected in the near term. As a result, Russian troops have been forced to rely on ground‑based communications, in some cases literally laying cables(opens in a new tab) under fire from Ukrainian forces. No matter how loudly the Russian disinformation machine promotes its latest weapons and technological breakthroughs, the underlying reality remains unchanged – the army hailed by some as the world’s second strongest has depended heavily on American civilian technology to wage its war.

EUvsDisinfo

39,339 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten