Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

New babecock edit. If this gets over 50 reposts I’ll make another one tonight… #bbc #bigblackcock #interracial #cuckold #blacked #qos #queenofspades #bnwo #babecock #bbcbabecock #forcedbi #cei #wankchat #wankbattle #saynotowhitebois

bbcbabecock01's profile picture

BBC BABECOCK

12,340 subscribers

60,211 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#bbc#bigblackcock#interracial#cuckold#blacked#qos#queenofspades#bnwo#babecock#bbcbabecock#forcedbi#cei#wankchat#wankbattle#saynotowhitebois
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

End of year dump! Classic Say No to Whitebois!!! Someone take these and edit/post em, have fun! #sph #bnwo #nsfw #interracial #caption #snowbunny #blackbulls #humiliation #babecock #conditioning #bigblackcock #bbc #blacked #qos #goonfuel #saynotowhitebois #bbconly
2:06

Sensitive content

End of year dump! Classic Say No to Whitebois!!! Someone take these and edit/post em, have fun! #sph #bnwo #nsfw #interracial #caption #snowbunny #blackbulls #humiliation #babecock #conditioning #bigblackcock #bbc #blacked #qos #goonfuel #saynotowhitebois #bbconly

SayNoToWhiteboizzz

32,055 просмотров • 2 лет назад

End of year dump! Classic Say No to Whitebois!!! Someone take these and edit/post em, have fun! 🙏🏻🔥 #sph #bnwo #nsfw #interracial #caption #snowbunny #blackbulls #humiliation #babecock #conditioning #bigblackcock #bbc #blacked #qos #goonfuel #saynotowhitebois #bbconly
1:55

Sensitive content

End of year dump! Classic Say No to Whitebois!!! Someone take these and edit/post em, have fun! 🙏🏻🔥 #sph #bnwo #nsfw #interracial #caption #snowbunny #blackbulls #humiliation #babecock #conditioning #bigblackcock #bbc #blacked #qos #goonfuel #saynotowhitebois #bbconly

SayNoToWhiteboizzz

17,507 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Fucked my BBC dildo and squirted 7 times. Requested by Meg carter Full 9 mins here #hotwife #slutwife #cougar #Riding #snowbunny #qos #queenofspades #interracial #blacked #bbc #sex #bnwo #whitegirl #cuckold #thick #thickwhitegirl #snowbunnies #bbcslut #sexy #milf #adultcontent #nsfw #onlyfans #vixen #stagvixen #realcouples #hotwifeclub #pawg #cuckoldfun #cuckold #bbccuck #interracialhotwife #milf #bigirls #interracialcouple #slut #BlackCockLover #bigblackcock #bbcaddiction #bbcworship #blackcock #porn #blacked #interracial #blackdick
0:42

Sensitive content

Fucked my BBC dildo and squirted 7 times. Requested by Meg carter Full 9 mins here #hotwife #slutwife #cougar #Riding #snowbunny #qos #queenofspades #interracial #blacked #bbc #sex #bnwo #whitegirl #cuckold #thick #thickwhitegirl #snowbunnies #bbcslut #sexy #milf #adultcontent #nsfw #onlyfans #vixen #stagvixen #realcouples #hotwifeclub #pawg #cuckoldfun #cuckold #bbccuck #interracialhotwife #milf #bigirls #interracialcouple #slut #BlackCockLover #bigblackcock #bbcaddiction #bbcworship #blackcock #porn #blacked #interracial #blackdick

Gianna Black

57,328 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 IRAN’S CEASE-FIRE IS COLLAPSING, AND THEY’RE PAYING THE PRICE The already shaky truce just took a major hit. Iran launched missiles and drones at Kuwait and Bahrain overnight, heavily damaging Kuwait’s international airport. One dead, over 60 wounded. All flights suspended. This was their “response” to U.S. action in the Persian Gulf. Big mistake. Central Command confirmed U.S. forces struck back hard, hitting Qeshm Island. American air defenses also smoked multiple waves of Iranian drones headed toward our troops. Zero U.S. casualties. President Trump is staying cool but firm: “We’ve dealt with Iran for 47 years… State sponsor of terror, number one in the world. It is rapidly evolving and it is evolving good. They won’t have a nuclear weapon.” Trump also said he delivered a clear message: “It is time for you one way or another to make a deal.” He’s even open to sitting down with the new Iranian leadership if it gets results. This regime is desperate and dangerous, but President Trump isn’t backing down. America is projecting strength again — exactly what’s needed after years of weakness. Iran can keep testing us… or they can come to the table before they lose everything. Stay strong, America. Trump’s got this.
3:31

🚨 IRAN’S CEASE-FIRE IS COLLAPSING, AND THEY’RE PAYING THE PRICE The already shaky truce just took a major hit. Iran launched missiles and drones at Kuwait and Bahrain overnight, heavily damaging Kuwait’s international airport. One dead, over 60 wounded. All flights suspended. This was their “response” to U.S. action in the Persian Gulf. Big mistake. Central Command confirmed U.S. forces struck back hard, hitting Qeshm Island. American air defenses also smoked multiple waves of Iranian drones headed toward our troops. Zero U.S. casualties. President Trump is staying cool but firm: “We’ve dealt with Iran for 47 years… State sponsor of terror, number one in the world. It is rapidly evolving and it is evolving good. They won’t have a nuclear weapon.” Trump also said he delivered a clear message: “It is time for you one way or another to make a deal.” He’s even open to sitting down with the new Iranian leadership if it gets results. This regime is desperate and dangerous, but President Trump isn’t backing down. America is projecting strength again — exactly what’s needed after years of weakness. Iran can keep testing us… or they can come to the table before they lose everything. Stay strong, America. Trump’s got this.

Gunther Eagleman™

142,006 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The mother of Will Roberts, the Alabama boy fighting cancer, is asking everyone for prayers, says they are trying to keep Will comfortable. Please pray for this family. Read Brittney Battles Roberts' post from Facebook below: "The biggest thing Will needs right now is a more aggressive approach. He has so much fluid that has to come off, but at the same time they have to balance his blood counts and platelets so it can be done safely. Now pneumonia has also set up in his lungs, and that’s another battle we have to fight. We’re not giving up. Months ago, Will looked at us and said, “God is going to take me to the edge and make believers out of us.” Yesterday he looked at Jason and said, “Don’t give up on me, Dad.” Those words matter. Today Will became more agitated and wasn’t resting well. One option was to continue increasing his sedation. We understand why. Nobody wants him uncomfortable. But as his parents, we also know that when you’re sleeping more, not moving, and already dealing with fluid and weak lungs, pneumonia doesn’t just sit there. It gets worse. Tonight, after he developed severe wheezing, we asked for an ICU doctor to come assess him. He sat down with us, listened to everything, and explained that they could be more aggressive with removing fluid, treating the pneumonia, and still keep Will comfortable and safe. That’s what we needed to hear. People ask us all the time what we’re praying for. We’re not praying for more time at any cost. We’ve already told the doctors that if God says it’s time, then it’s time. We are at peace with that. But we are also not willing to sit back and let something treatable take over without asking if there is more that can be done. If fluid can come off, we want it off. If pneumonia can be treated, we want it treated. If there’s a chance to make him more comfortable while still fighting what can be fought, that’s what we want. We’re okay with death if it comes while we’re trying. Advocating at this level is new territory for us. We’ve never had to make decisions like this before. Every choice feels heavy, and we question ourselves constantly. But one thing we know is this… Will asked us not to give up on him so that’s exactly what we’re going to do. Please keep praying. Pray for wisdom. Pray for the ICU team. Pray they can safely remove this fluid, get this pneumonia under control, and keep Will comfortable through it all. And pray that Jason and I continue to have the strength to make the right decisions for our son."
1:03

The mother of Will Roberts, the Alabama boy fighting cancer, is asking everyone for prayers, says they are trying to keep Will comfortable. Please pray for this family. Read Brittney Battles Roberts' post from Facebook below: "The biggest thing Will needs right now is a more aggressive approach. He has so much fluid that has to come off, but at the same time they have to balance his blood counts and platelets so it can be done safely. Now pneumonia has also set up in his lungs, and that’s another battle we have to fight. We’re not giving up. Months ago, Will looked at us and said, “God is going to take me to the edge and make believers out of us.” Yesterday he looked at Jason and said, “Don’t give up on me, Dad.” Those words matter. Today Will became more agitated and wasn’t resting well. One option was to continue increasing his sedation. We understand why. Nobody wants him uncomfortable. But as his parents, we also know that when you’re sleeping more, not moving, and already dealing with fluid and weak lungs, pneumonia doesn’t just sit there. It gets worse. Tonight, after he developed severe wheezing, we asked for an ICU doctor to come assess him. He sat down with us, listened to everything, and explained that they could be more aggressive with removing fluid, treating the pneumonia, and still keep Will comfortable and safe. That’s what we needed to hear. People ask us all the time what we’re praying for. We’re not praying for more time at any cost. We’ve already told the doctors that if God says it’s time, then it’s time. We are at peace with that. But we are also not willing to sit back and let something treatable take over without asking if there is more that can be done. If fluid can come off, we want it off. If pneumonia can be treated, we want it treated. If there’s a chance to make him more comfortable while still fighting what can be fought, that’s what we want. We’re okay with death if it comes while we’re trying. Advocating at this level is new territory for us. We’ve never had to make decisions like this before. Every choice feels heavy, and we question ourselves constantly. But one thing we know is this… Will asked us not to give up on him so that’s exactly what we’re going to do. Please keep praying. Pray for wisdom. Pray for the ICU team. Pray they can safely remove this fluid, get this pneumonia under control, and keep Will comfortable through it all. And pray that Jason and I continue to have the strength to make the right decisions for our son."

Collin Rugg

385,539 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Nobody actually knows where April Fools' Day came from. 🎭 But the best theory involves Britain, a Pope, and eleven days that simply ceased to exist. For over 1,600 years Europe ran on the Julian calendar. Created by Julius Caesar. New Year fell on 1 April around the spring equinox. In 1582 Pope Gregory XIII said the calendar had drifted ten days from the actual solar year. He introduced the Gregorian calendar. New Year moved to 1 January. 📅 France switched immediately. Most of Catholic Europe followed. Britain refused. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For 170 years. When Britain finally gave in during September 1752, eleven days had to be removed to correct the drift. 2 September was followed immediately by 14 September. Eleven days. Gone. People rioted in the streets demanding them back. Meanwhile, not everyone got the memo about the new New Year. People who kept celebrating on 1 April were mocked. Sent on pointless errands. Called April Fools. 🐦 In Scotland it was called Hunting the Gowk. Gowk means cuckoo. A symbol for an idiot. In 1957 the BBC ran a straight-faced news report about the Swiss spaghetti harvest. Farmers harvesting spaghetti strands from trees. Thousands called in asking where to buy one. The BBC told them to plant a sprig in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best. 🍝 All because Britain refused to change the date. This is your history. 🇬🇧 This channel exists because people like you chose to make it happen. Thousands of stories like this one are waiting to be told. Battles won. Names forgotten. History that belongs to all of us but gets told to none of us. If you want to be part of keeping it alive: 🇬🇧 Drop your best April Fools joke in the comments 👇 Or tell us what you've got planned today! Be Part Of Us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧
1:55

Nobody actually knows where April Fools' Day came from. 🎭 But the best theory involves Britain, a Pope, and eleven days that simply ceased to exist. For over 1,600 years Europe ran on the Julian calendar. Created by Julius Caesar. New Year fell on 1 April around the spring equinox. In 1582 Pope Gregory XIII said the calendar had drifted ten days from the actual solar year. He introduced the Gregorian calendar. New Year moved to 1 January. 📅 France switched immediately. Most of Catholic Europe followed. Britain refused. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For 170 years. When Britain finally gave in during September 1752, eleven days had to be removed to correct the drift. 2 September was followed immediately by 14 September. Eleven days. Gone. People rioted in the streets demanding them back. Meanwhile, not everyone got the memo about the new New Year. People who kept celebrating on 1 April were mocked. Sent on pointless errands. Called April Fools. 🐦 In Scotland it was called Hunting the Gowk. Gowk means cuckoo. A symbol for an idiot. In 1957 the BBC ran a straight-faced news report about the Swiss spaghetti harvest. Farmers harvesting spaghetti strands from trees. Thousands called in asking where to buy one. The BBC told them to plant a sprig in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best. 🍝 All because Britain refused to change the date. This is your history. 🇬🇧 This channel exists because people like you chose to make it happen. Thousands of stories like this one are waiting to be told. Battles won. Names forgotten. History that belongs to all of us but gets told to none of us. If you want to be part of keeping it alive: 🇬🇧 Drop your best April Fools joke in the comments 👇 Or tell us what you've got planned today! Be Part Of Us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

52,847 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

If I was trying to GROW an app or ecomm right now, I wouldn't waste money on influencers or ads. I'd hire creators nobody's heard of and use this strategy that's working right now and generating 100k+ app installs to companies like focustree Influencer with 100k followers: $2,000+ for one post. Gets maybe 30k views. Everyone knows it's an ad. Creator with 500 followers: $900 for an entire month. Posts 30 times. Gets 500k+ views total. Feels more organic. That's $1.80 per thousand views versus $6-12 on Facebook. And it doesn't look like an ad because it isn't one. It's just content. "oH bUt ThaT's NoT PoSsIbLE, GrEG" I agree, this shouldn't work. But it's happening more and more and here's why: *new episode of the pod is live and we give you the playbook* But TikTok's For You Page broke the entire game. The algorithm doesn't care about follower count anymore. It only cares if people watch. IG copied this. YT copied this. Everyone copied this. Now some kid with 300 followers can outperform a verified influencer because their content is better. Not their audience. Their content. Most brands haven't figured this out. They're still paying for follower count like it's 2019. So, the smart play is hiring 10 creators instead of 1. Example: Pay 10 creators $900/month each. That's $9k total. Each posts daily across TikTok, Reels, Shorts. That's 900 pieces of content per month. When one hits, you message the group: "Everyone copy this format." Now 10 creators are using the winning formula with their own spin. The algorithm sees ten different videos, not reposts. One viral format becomes ten viral videos. Those teach you what works. You find the next format. It compounds. How to find creators Search your category on TikTok. You don't want influencers with media kits. You want people already making content about your space for fun. DM them: "Want $900/month to keep doing what you're doing?" They're posting anyway. Now they're getting paid. Run it through Discord or WhatsApp. Share what's working daily. "This hook is crushing." "Try this sound." Track everything. When something explodes, everyone pivots to that format until it stops working. This only works for products that make sense in 10 seconds. Apps with one clear feature. Products under $50. Anything bought on impulse. If you need a sales deck to explain it, this isn't for you. The beauty is what happens beyond direct sales. Someone sees your app on TikTok. They don't buy immediately. But next week they Google "that app from TikTok." Your search traffic spikes. Your app store ranking climbs. The halo effect is massive. Right now this is pure arbitrage. In two years, agencies will package this, prices will 10x, and the window closes. But today you can hire a creator army for what one influencer post costs. You can test more in a week than most brands test in a year. You're building a content machine. All algortihms care about nowadays is if people stop scrolling. Find creators who make people stop scrolling. Pay them to never stop posting. Share what works. Scale what hits. People charge $10k for this sort of info. We give it away for free on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 2x week. Thanks to Cody Schneider for jumping on and sharing. We could keep this to ourselves but where is the fun in that? Fun is seeing you build a bootstrapped app to millions of users through this strategy And sending me a dm And saying "thanks for the tip, professor g" No worries, my friend No worries.
27:37

If I was trying to GROW an app or ecomm right now, I wouldn't waste money on influencers or ads. I'd hire creators nobody's heard of and use this strategy that's working right now and generating 100k+ app installs to companies like focustree Influencer with 100k followers: $2,000+ for one post. Gets maybe 30k views. Everyone knows it's an ad. Creator with 500 followers: $900 for an entire month. Posts 30 times. Gets 500k+ views total. Feels more organic. That's $1.80 per thousand views versus $6-12 on Facebook. And it doesn't look like an ad because it isn't one. It's just content. "oH bUt ThaT's NoT PoSsIbLE, GrEG" I agree, this shouldn't work. But it's happening more and more and here's why: *new episode of the pod is live and we give you the playbook* But TikTok's For You Page broke the entire game. The algorithm doesn't care about follower count anymore. It only cares if people watch. IG copied this. YT copied this. Everyone copied this. Now some kid with 300 followers can outperform a verified influencer because their content is better. Not their audience. Their content. Most brands haven't figured this out. They're still paying for follower count like it's 2019. So, the smart play is hiring 10 creators instead of 1. Example: Pay 10 creators $900/month each. That's $9k total. Each posts daily across TikTok, Reels, Shorts. That's 900 pieces of content per month. When one hits, you message the group: "Everyone copy this format." Now 10 creators are using the winning formula with their own spin. The algorithm sees ten different videos, not reposts. One viral format becomes ten viral videos. Those teach you what works. You find the next format. It compounds. How to find creators Search your category on TikTok. You don't want influencers with media kits. You want people already making content about your space for fun. DM them: "Want $900/month to keep doing what you're doing?" They're posting anyway. Now they're getting paid. Run it through Discord or WhatsApp. Share what's working daily. "This hook is crushing." "Try this sound." Track everything. When something explodes, everyone pivots to that format until it stops working. This only works for products that make sense in 10 seconds. Apps with one clear feature. Products under $50. Anything bought on impulse. If you need a sales deck to explain it, this isn't for you. The beauty is what happens beyond direct sales. Someone sees your app on TikTok. They don't buy immediately. But next week they Google "that app from TikTok." Your search traffic spikes. Your app store ranking climbs. The halo effect is massive. Right now this is pure arbitrage. In two years, agencies will package this, prices will 10x, and the window closes. But today you can hire a creator army for what one influencer post costs. You can test more in a week than most brands test in a year. You're building a content machine. All algortihms care about nowadays is if people stop scrolling. Find creators who make people stop scrolling. Pay them to never stop posting. Share what works. Scale what hits. People charge $10k for this sort of info. We give it away for free on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 2x week. Thanks to Cody Schneider for jumping on and sharing. We could keep this to ourselves but where is the fun in that? Fun is seeing you build a bootstrapped app to millions of users through this strategy And sending me a dm And saying "thanks for the tip, professor g" No worries, my friend No worries.

GREG ISENBERG

100,052 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

A new documentary about Ye that explores his mental health features an explosive scene where the rapper screams on his former mother-in-law, Kris Jenner. On Friday (Sept. 19), the new documentary In Whose Name? hit theaters. The film chronicles the artist formerly known as Kanye West's struggles with his mental well-being over a six-year period, from 2018 to 2024. In one eye-opening scene, Ye gets into a heated argument with his ex-wife, Kim Kardashian's mother. "No one in this family is taking any responsibility for my hospital visit," Ye snaps. "If you look online, that's 50 percent of what people say, at least. Am I lying?" When Jenner tells Ye that the chatter online doesn't matter, he becomes enraged. "It do matter!" he screams at the top of his lungs. "It does matter! "It matters to us and you, it doesn't matter what the internet says," Jenner reacts, trying to quell the situation. Another scene in the film documents the immediate aftermath of Ye's controversial Saturday Night Live appearance in 2018, where he claimed he was bullied backstage about wearing a MAGA hat. In the clip, SNL cast member Michael Che checks Ye about his comments after the show. "Airing it out like that without letting us be able to reply is kinda foul," Che tells Ye. "You a hero to us. We love you, seriously. That's wrong to do to us." The new documentary was directed by Nico Ballesteros. It also chronicles Ye's failed 2020 presidential campaign, the collapse of his marriage to Kim K and alarming anti-Semitic outbursts.
1:00

A new documentary about Ye that explores his mental health features an explosive scene where the rapper screams on his former mother-in-law, Kris Jenner. On Friday (Sept. 19), the new documentary In Whose Name? hit theaters. The film chronicles the artist formerly known as Kanye West's struggles with his mental well-being over a six-year period, from 2018 to 2024. In one eye-opening scene, Ye gets into a heated argument with his ex-wife, Kim Kardashian's mother. "No one in this family is taking any responsibility for my hospital visit," Ye snaps. "If you look online, that's 50 percent of what people say, at least. Am I lying?" When Jenner tells Ye that the chatter online doesn't matter, he becomes enraged. "It do matter!" he screams at the top of his lungs. "It does matter! "It matters to us and you, it doesn't matter what the internet says," Jenner reacts, trying to quell the situation. Another scene in the film documents the immediate aftermath of Ye's controversial Saturday Night Live appearance in 2018, where he claimed he was bullied backstage about wearing a MAGA hat. In the clip, SNL cast member Michael Che checks Ye about his comments after the show. "Airing it out like that without letting us be able to reply is kinda foul," Che tells Ye. "You a hero to us. We love you, seriously. That's wrong to do to us." The new documentary was directed by Nico Ballesteros. It also chronicles Ye's failed 2020 presidential campaign, the collapse of his marriage to Kim K and alarming anti-Semitic outbursts.

XXL Magazine

79,266 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Qullamaggie on If You Want Elite Returns, You Need to Be In The Elite Stocks “NOTV, oh man this is wide and loose. No no no, this is not a stock you want to trade. This is not a trading stock. No. Focus on explosive moves. Look at the prior move on the flagpole. Guys most of you really would do better if you just re-watch the swing trading school videos. The previous move needs to be big okay. It needs to be explosive. Those are the ones you want to focus on, not some random stuff like this. Yeah it's made a big move over the past eight months but it's not a trading stock it's a choppy one. It’s mean reverting. You want explosive stocks. You want to you want to focus on the elite stocks okay. The only way to have elite results is focusing on elite stocks Now, this is what I talk about elite stock. Now, this guy gets it, okay? Big previous move. 170% in two sessions. Pull back. Found support on a rising 10. It's been surfing the rising 10, building higher lows, and now it's tightening the range. Look at this pattern. It's called a triangle. Now, this is an elite stock. If you want to find the stock that has the potential to make a 50% move or a 100% move, you will get it on a stock that has tripled in a few days in the previous few weeks or months. You're not going to get it on a stock that just keeps grinding slowly higher. It's a numbers game, it's an odds game. Now this is a good setup. This is f*cking beautiful, it reminds me about LEDS a month back. LEDS, beautiful. Big previous move, 265% in 3 days, orderly pullback, found support on the 10 day, okay? Look at this, this is a triangle, tightening range, range expansion. And look at the move it did. It went up 263% in the next two weeks. How do you find a move like this? You're not gonna find a breakout of 263% on a stock like... I mean, look at some of the suggestions I've gotten lately. Like, NOTV. The previous move was 20%, not even 20%. SGMS, another, it's a grinder. Okay, 35% these things are very like sluggish, okay? It went up 35% in what, a month? It's not an explosive stock. Focus on the superstars. BYND, this is the one I'm tracking, okay? I'm really excited about this one. I think another one or two days of tightening range, I'm gonna go full retard on it. Look at this, it went up. This is a mid cap. It went up 46% in a week, okay? That's an explosive move. Especially for being a mid cap. Does it matter than the weekly? No, forget about weekly charts. You guys don't need to pay attention to the weekly charts. Don't worry about the weekly charts until you get to 10 plus million. Then you can start worrying about it. No, focus on the daily charts. Focus on one month, three month and six month momentum. That's where you're gonna focus on the strongest stocks across those three timeframes. The 1%, the elite.”
3:51

Qullamaggie on If You Want Elite Returns, You Need to Be In The Elite Stocks “NOTV, oh man this is wide and loose. No no no, this is not a stock you want to trade. This is not a trading stock. No. Focus on explosive moves. Look at the prior move on the flagpole. Guys most of you really would do better if you just re-watch the swing trading school videos. The previous move needs to be big okay. It needs to be explosive. Those are the ones you want to focus on, not some random stuff like this. Yeah it's made a big move over the past eight months but it's not a trading stock it's a choppy one. It’s mean reverting. You want explosive stocks. You want to you want to focus on the elite stocks okay. The only way to have elite results is focusing on elite stocks Now, this is what I talk about elite stock. Now, this guy gets it, okay? Big previous move. 170% in two sessions. Pull back. Found support on a rising 10. It's been surfing the rising 10, building higher lows, and now it's tightening the range. Look at this pattern. It's called a triangle. Now, this is an elite stock. If you want to find the stock that has the potential to make a 50% move or a 100% move, you will get it on a stock that has tripled in a few days in the previous few weeks or months. You're not going to get it on a stock that just keeps grinding slowly higher. It's a numbers game, it's an odds game. Now this is a good setup. This is f*cking beautiful, it reminds me about LEDS a month back. LEDS, beautiful. Big previous move, 265% in 3 days, orderly pullback, found support on the 10 day, okay? Look at this, this is a triangle, tightening range, range expansion. And look at the move it did. It went up 263% in the next two weeks. How do you find a move like this? You're not gonna find a breakout of 263% on a stock like... I mean, look at some of the suggestions I've gotten lately. Like, NOTV. The previous move was 20%, not even 20%. SGMS, another, it's a grinder. Okay, 35% these things are very like sluggish, okay? It went up 35% in what, a month? It's not an explosive stock. Focus on the superstars. BYND, this is the one I'm tracking, okay? I'm really excited about this one. I think another one or two days of tightening range, I'm gonna go full retard on it. Look at this, it went up. This is a mid cap. It went up 46% in a week, okay? That's an explosive move. Especially for being a mid cap. Does it matter than the weekly? No, forget about weekly charts. You guys don't need to pay attention to the weekly charts. Don't worry about the weekly charts until you get to 10 plus million. Then you can start worrying about it. No, focus on the daily charts. Focus on one month, three month and six month momentum. That's where you're gonna focus on the strongest stocks across those three timeframes. The 1%, the elite.”

Lone

20,351 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

⚡️Some notes on Russian plane shoot down: 1. New video seen below from near the area of missile launch proves that Russian defenses shot down the plane from nearby. This immediately disproves that Ukrainian missiles had anything to do with the shoot down. 2. There is zero proof an A-50 was shot down and in fact the currently best known information from the serial number on the tail indicates this was an Il-76TD, but it is not yet known for certain with any confirmation. 3. That we now know for 100% fact that Russian systems shot it down would seem to be even greater proof that it was not an A-50 because Russian S-400s in the area would absolutely have a IFF link with an A-50, but possibly not with the civilian variant Il-76TD. This weighs the likelihood heavier into Il-76 territory. 4. But there's some wrinkles to this. Sure, the missiles wouldn't initially lock onto an A-50, but there's some very remote possibility they were shooting another object and at the terminal phase, where IFF already gets iffy if not outright negated, the missile(s) may have redirected onto a potential A-50. This is a remote possibility, but the likelihood for now still weighs far heavier towards the Il-76TD explanation. 5. What other object would Russian S-400s possibly be engaging near Krasnodar where no Ukrainian missile can reach? That's simple: potentially a drone of some kind. One person had the idea that Ukrainian saboteurs in the region can even fly drones locally in the flight path of Russian military planes coming in for landing at the airport. It's possible something like this was engaged. 6. But there's an even bigger wrinkle: the plane that was shot down was firing flares. Not all Il-76s or even A-50s necessarily carry flares, they have to have a special attachment to do so. Secondly, only a plane that knows a missile is locked onto it would even fire flares. That means the plane needs to have RWR (Radar Warning Receiver), which both A-50 and Il-76 are supposed to have, though I'm not sure about the Il-76TD variant. 7. There is possibility some long range Ukrainian missile was involved indirectly, but not an AD system. I.e. something like a Storm Shadow or ATACMS could hypothetically have been fired at Krasnodar, and Russian S-400s attempted to intercept it and missed. But this is unlikely as the range from Ukrainian territory is much higher than any of their known cruise missiles. Conclusion: Now that we are almost certain from the new video that Russian S-400s performed the shoot down, particularly at close range where IFF interrogation can still easily happen (as opposed to beyond radar horizon where terminal guidance can take over and make things iffy), the A-50 is very unlikely as A-50 certainly has IFF interrogation link with S-400s. The Il-76TD IFF with S-400 is more questionable as it is technically a civilian variant, though it is in use by government agencies like emergency services. Therefore the version that it was a Il-76TD is as of now more realistic, particularly because there is zero proof of it being an A-50 other than the echochamber formed from 1 person's unsourced guess on Telegram. Lastly: since the below video proves that all Ukrainian claims of their involvement in the shootdown today were lies, it logically follows that anything they have to say about the plane being A-50 are also propaganda/lies, which makes it even likelier that it was in fact an Il-76.
0:32

⚡️Some notes on Russian plane shoot down: 1. New video seen below from near the area of missile launch proves that Russian defenses shot down the plane from nearby. This immediately disproves that Ukrainian missiles had anything to do with the shoot down. 2. There is zero proof an A-50 was shot down and in fact the currently best known information from the serial number on the tail indicates this was an Il-76TD, but it is not yet known for certain with any confirmation. 3. That we now know for 100% fact that Russian systems shot it down would seem to be even greater proof that it was not an A-50 because Russian S-400s in the area would absolutely have a IFF link with an A-50, but possibly not with the civilian variant Il-76TD. This weighs the likelihood heavier into Il-76 territory. 4. But there's some wrinkles to this. Sure, the missiles wouldn't initially lock onto an A-50, but there's some very remote possibility they were shooting another object and at the terminal phase, where IFF already gets iffy if not outright negated, the missile(s) may have redirected onto a potential A-50. This is a remote possibility, but the likelihood for now still weighs far heavier towards the Il-76TD explanation. 5. What other object would Russian S-400s possibly be engaging near Krasnodar where no Ukrainian missile can reach? That's simple: potentially a drone of some kind. One person had the idea that Ukrainian saboteurs in the region can even fly drones locally in the flight path of Russian military planes coming in for landing at the airport. It's possible something like this was engaged. 6. But there's an even bigger wrinkle: the plane that was shot down was firing flares. Not all Il-76s or even A-50s necessarily carry flares, they have to have a special attachment to do so. Secondly, only a plane that knows a missile is locked onto it would even fire flares. That means the plane needs to have RWR (Radar Warning Receiver), which both A-50 and Il-76 are supposed to have, though I'm not sure about the Il-76TD variant. 7. There is possibility some long range Ukrainian missile was involved indirectly, but not an AD system. I.e. something like a Storm Shadow or ATACMS could hypothetically have been fired at Krasnodar, and Russian S-400s attempted to intercept it and missed. But this is unlikely as the range from Ukrainian territory is much higher than any of their known cruise missiles. Conclusion: Now that we are almost certain from the new video that Russian S-400s performed the shoot down, particularly at close range where IFF interrogation can still easily happen (as opposed to beyond radar horizon where terminal guidance can take over and make things iffy), the A-50 is very unlikely as A-50 certainly has IFF interrogation link with S-400s. The Il-76TD IFF with S-400 is more questionable as it is technically a civilian variant, though it is in use by government agencies like emergency services. Therefore the version that it was a Il-76TD is as of now more realistic, particularly because there is zero proof of it being an A-50 other than the echochamber formed from 1 person's unsourced guess on Telegram. Lastly: since the below video proves that all Ukrainian claims of their involvement in the shootdown today were lies, it logically follows that anything they have to say about the plane being A-50 are also propaganda/lies, which makes it even likelier that it was in fact an Il-76.

SIMPLICIUS Ѱ

91,622 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Marc Andreessen explains IBM founder Thomas Watson‘s famous “Wild Ducks” program Marc believes that the organizational complexity is one reason you don’t see innovation at large companies. But that’s not the only reason: “I think there’s another deeper thing underneath that that people really don’t like to talk about, which is the sheer number of people in the world who are capable of doing new things is just a very small set of people. You’re not going to have a hundred of them in a company… You’re going to have 3, 8, or 10, maybe.” Marc learned this early in his career at IBM, which was one of the most powerful companies in the world and had over 440,000 employees at the time. “They had a system that worked really well for 50 years. Most of the employees in the company were expected to basically follow rules… But they had this category of people they called ‘Wild Ducks.’ This was an idea that the founder Thomas Watson came up with. They often had the formal title of an IBM Fellow and they were the people who could make new things.” He continues: “There were eight of them and they got to break all the rules and invent new products. They got to go off and work on something new, they didn’t have to report back, they got to pull people off of other projects to work with them, they got budget when they needed it, and they reported directly to the CEO.” Marc recalls one wild duck, Andy Heller, putting his cowboy boots on the conference room table “amongst an ocean of men in blue suits, white shirts, and red ties.” It was fine for Andy Heller to do that, but it was not fine for you to do that. “They very specifically identified almost like an aristocratic class within our company that gets to play by different rules… Their job is to invent the next breakthrough product. We, IBM management, know that the 6,000 person division is not going to invent the next product. We know it’s going to be crazy Andy Heller and his cowboy boots.” Marc believes companies like IBM and HP ultimately collapsed when venture capital emerged as a parallel funding system for these wild ducks to start their own companies. Video source: Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. (2023)
2:49

Marc Andreessen explains IBM founder Thomas Watson‘s famous “Wild Ducks” program Marc believes that the organizational complexity is one reason you don’t see innovation at large companies. But that’s not the only reason: “I think there’s another deeper thing underneath that that people really don’t like to talk about, which is the sheer number of people in the world who are capable of doing new things is just a very small set of people. You’re not going to have a hundred of them in a company… You’re going to have 3, 8, or 10, maybe.” Marc learned this early in his career at IBM, which was one of the most powerful companies in the world and had over 440,000 employees at the time. “They had a system that worked really well for 50 years. Most of the employees in the company were expected to basically follow rules… But they had this category of people they called ‘Wild Ducks.’ This was an idea that the founder Thomas Watson came up with. They often had the formal title of an IBM Fellow and they were the people who could make new things.” He continues: “There were eight of them and they got to break all the rules and invent new products. They got to go off and work on something new, they didn’t have to report back, they got to pull people off of other projects to work with them, they got budget when they needed it, and they reported directly to the CEO.” Marc recalls one wild duck, Andy Heller, putting his cowboy boots on the conference room table “amongst an ocean of men in blue suits, white shirts, and red ties.” It was fine for Andy Heller to do that, but it was not fine for you to do that. “They very specifically identified almost like an aristocratic class within our company that gets to play by different rules… Their job is to invent the next breakthrough product. We, IBM management, know that the 6,000 person division is not going to invent the next product. We know it’s going to be crazy Andy Heller and his cowboy boots.” Marc believes companies like IBM and HP ultimately collapsed when venture capital emerged as a parallel funding system for these wild ducks to start their own companies. Video source: Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. (2023)

Startup Archive

358,782 просмотров • 1 год назад

Asia’s richest man just bought himself $300 billion worth of political cover from the US president. The first new US oil refinery in 50 YEARS is being built in Texas - backed by India’s Reliance Industries. Everyone's celebrating it as "energy dominance." But when you dig into who's involved, the timing, and where the money's really going, this story makes NO sense... Let's start with the $300 billion number. It makes zero sense for a single refinery. Reliance's own Jamnagar facility in India, the world's largest refinery complex, cost roughly $6 billion to build. It processes 1.4 million barrels per day. The Brownsville project is permitted for 160,000 barrels per day. That's 1/9th the capacity. A realistic cost? $5-15 billion max. $300 billion is the GDP of Ireland. So where's the other $280+ billion going? Nobody knows. The company building it is called America First Refining. Until very recently, they were Element Fuels Holdings. A Dallas startup that's been trying to build this exact refinery since 2015. Nearly a decade of permits, environmental filings, and pre-construction on 240 acres at the Port of Brownsville. They rebranded to "America First Refining" right before this announcement. The timing is almost too perfect. Now let's talk about Reliance: Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries isn't just India's biggest energy company. It's India's biggest EVERYTHING company. Telecom, retail, media, petrochemicals, AI. Market cap over $230 billion. Ambani is Asia's richest person. The man isn't building refineries because he's passionate about Texas gasoline. He's building political capital. India is under massive US pressure to stop buying Russian oil. Reliance's Jamnagar refinery has been one of the biggest processors of sanctioned Russian crude. The US has been leaning on Ambani hard to cut those purchases. So what does Ambani do? Shows up with a massive investment branded "America First," timed exactly when the president needs an energy win. Oil just spiked past $100 a barrel because of the Iran war. Gas prices jumped 50 cents in a week. Trump's facing political heat over energy costs heading into midterms. And suddenly here's this $300 billion headline. Ambani gets goodwill. Trump gets a headline. The refinery might get built in 2027. Maybe. This isn't just a deal. Ambani invests in American energy PR. In exchange, the US eases pressure on Reliance's Russian oil imports, which generate billions in profit because sanctioned crude trades at massive discounts. A $300 billion headline buys a LOT of political cover. The refinery itself is actually smart regardless of the politics. Brownsville sits on the US-Mexico border. Deepwater port. Direct Permian Basin pipeline access. Free trade zone. Hydrogen-powered processing that would make it one of the cleanest refineries ever built. IF they build it, it transforms one of the most economically distressed regions in Texas. But one thing's certain, $300 billion is a political number, not an engineering number. And the timing, with oil doing what it's doing, Iran disrupting 20% of global supply, gas prices surging, and midterms approaching, tells you everything about why this was announced TODAY. This is a handshake between the richest man in Asia and the most powerful man in America. Both get exactly what they need. The question is whether American consumers get anything out of it. Or whether this becomes another announcement that sounds incredible on paper but disappears after a few months.
1:14

Asia’s richest man just bought himself $300 billion worth of political cover from the US president. The first new US oil refinery in 50 YEARS is being built in Texas - backed by India’s Reliance Industries. Everyone's celebrating it as "energy dominance." But when you dig into who's involved, the timing, and where the money's really going, this story makes NO sense... Let's start with the $300 billion number. It makes zero sense for a single refinery. Reliance's own Jamnagar facility in India, the world's largest refinery complex, cost roughly $6 billion to build. It processes 1.4 million barrels per day. The Brownsville project is permitted for 160,000 barrels per day. That's 1/9th the capacity. A realistic cost? $5-15 billion max. $300 billion is the GDP of Ireland. So where's the other $280+ billion going? Nobody knows. The company building it is called America First Refining. Until very recently, they were Element Fuels Holdings. A Dallas startup that's been trying to build this exact refinery since 2015. Nearly a decade of permits, environmental filings, and pre-construction on 240 acres at the Port of Brownsville. They rebranded to "America First Refining" right before this announcement. The timing is almost too perfect. Now let's talk about Reliance: Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries isn't just India's biggest energy company. It's India's biggest EVERYTHING company. Telecom, retail, media, petrochemicals, AI. Market cap over $230 billion. Ambani is Asia's richest person. The man isn't building refineries because he's passionate about Texas gasoline. He's building political capital. India is under massive US pressure to stop buying Russian oil. Reliance's Jamnagar refinery has been one of the biggest processors of sanctioned Russian crude. The US has been leaning on Ambani hard to cut those purchases. So what does Ambani do? Shows up with a massive investment branded "America First," timed exactly when the president needs an energy win. Oil just spiked past $100 a barrel because of the Iran war. Gas prices jumped 50 cents in a week. Trump's facing political heat over energy costs heading into midterms. And suddenly here's this $300 billion headline. Ambani gets goodwill. Trump gets a headline. The refinery might get built in 2027. Maybe. This isn't just a deal. Ambani invests in American energy PR. In exchange, the US eases pressure on Reliance's Russian oil imports, which generate billions in profit because sanctioned crude trades at massive discounts. A $300 billion headline buys a LOT of political cover. The refinery itself is actually smart regardless of the politics. Brownsville sits on the US-Mexico border. Deepwater port. Direct Permian Basin pipeline access. Free trade zone. Hydrogen-powered processing that would make it one of the cleanest refineries ever built. IF they build it, it transforms one of the most economically distressed regions in Texas. But one thing's certain, $300 billion is a political number, not an engineering number. And the timing, with oil doing what it's doing, Iran disrupting 20% of global supply, gas prices surging, and midterms approaching, tells you everything about why this was announced TODAY. This is a handshake between the richest man in Asia and the most powerful man in America. Both get exactly what they need. The question is whether American consumers get anything out of it. Or whether this becomes another announcement that sounds incredible on paper but disappears after a few months.

Ricardo

549,801 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Welcome to the United Kingdom: A Nation Where Votes Mattered More Than Children I’m often asked a fair question: If the Pakistani Rape Gang scandal was tied to Labour, why did the Conservatives do nothing to stop it? The full answer is complex, and I’ll set it out in detail in an article this weekend. But the short answer is brutally simple. Labour had worked out how to weaponise the scandal for political gain, hence the charge that they sold little White girls for votes. The Conservatives, on the other hand, didn’t even bother. In power for 14 years, they failed to intervene with anywhere near their new found vigour for one reason: they simply did not care enough about the White working class and their children. For the Conservatives, as a political party in government, protecting little White girls was never a political priority. Unlike Labour, there were no votes in it for them. That is the starting point. However uncomfortable it is, that’s the truth. And it gets much darker from here. _________ I am Raja Miah. For six years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. During this time, Labour politicians tried everything possible to stop me. I spent 3 years on bail as case after case they fabricated against me collapsed in court. My mother died before I was able to clear my name. Now the truth is out. In detail. The Pakistani Rape Gangs are real. And their victims, little White girls, number in the hundreds of thousands. So now the question is: will you stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash? 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year): 👉 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. - Raja Miah MBE
1:41

Welcome to the United Kingdom: A Nation Where Votes Mattered More Than Children I’m often asked a fair question: If the Pakistani Rape Gang scandal was tied to Labour, why did the Conservatives do nothing to stop it? The full answer is complex, and I’ll set it out in detail in an article this weekend. But the short answer is brutally simple. Labour had worked out how to weaponise the scandal for political gain, hence the charge that they sold little White girls for votes. The Conservatives, on the other hand, didn’t even bother. In power for 14 years, they failed to intervene with anywhere near their new found vigour for one reason: they simply did not care enough about the White working class and their children. For the Conservatives, as a political party in government, protecting little White girls was never a political priority. Unlike Labour, there were no votes in it for them. That is the starting point. However uncomfortable it is, that’s the truth. And it gets much darker from here. _________ I am Raja Miah. For six years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. During this time, Labour politicians tried everything possible to stop me. I spent 3 years on bail as case after case they fabricated against me collapsed in court. My mother died before I was able to clear my name. Now the truth is out. In detail. The Pakistani Rape Gangs are real. And their victims, little White girls, number in the hundreds of thousands. So now the question is: will you stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash? 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year): 👉 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. - Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

28,664 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

yall think black hat sauce is methods wtf do you think is the base for those methods? It's making them believe and feel false realities > If you want real black hat alpha, this is it. YOU WANT your VSLs or marketing campaigns to have a high CVR, AOV & retention (mrr in the backend) black hat methods get to these means in many ways like (fake authority using ai for clebs, back end mrr, fake promises, etc) >> however you can overcome the need for all of this while getting the same end results by just curating the reality of the VSL and experience in general to fit what those methods would have done. like for example - how would we be able to invoke a first time experience ecstasy of emotion in a vsl? > not only will this make the experience of the ad unique but also give you a platform to create a real authority figure that matches the belief of a cleb. from my experience I've found the way to do this is visually, auditorily, and ofc with your creatives. As yall know for my VSLs I try to take very unique different angles, with very specific visuals that back it up. and if you have trouble with this, you're literally in the perfect time in the world. You can use sora 2, put in your theme & ideas and ask it to be creative, include 100 different shots/scenes (add a aesthetic source image to make the generations 100x better) and boom. You have so many different frames and angles to get inspired by. > Also with MRR, you know one neurochemical that boosts the fuck out of CVR & retention? makes you trust more in a offer, promise, and changes your consciousness in ways that subsequently makes you spend more? its oxytocin. best example that I always use. the Charity water VSL (search up on yt). $700m off of MRR how? because of how touching and deep it hit. those types of narratives and experiences is what secretes oxytocin. And that's one legit real way you can boost your mrr and keep it long term if your angle is tied in a way to keep eliciting that reaction. It can be for any offer or product, happy or sad (best to stick with happy unless for a charity vsl like this one, or if yk what you're doing). > However remember one chemical change doesn't mean everything. There are tons of different states of mind you can put someone in, but they won't led to the results you want unless you include Specifics (on the offer, promises, and social proofs/belief elements) A big idea & unique angle and a proposition that ties in the creative --> to a reason showing that they NEED to buy this offer for whatever reason. >>> these changes and efforts we go to make a VSL work, doesn't pull it's weight & potential if we don't see it through a lens of economic game theory. over the last 28 years or so "several lines of experimentation have discovered that our goal- directed behaviors can be under “unconscious control” (Custers & Aarts, 2010)" The unconscious mind is the foundation for all your customers actions, they act because the deeper sections of their brains pick up a cue run it through memory, and pre biologically embedded risk/reward and elimination scenarios to see if this new stimuli is similar/relevant to past stimuli that has aided in spreading it's genes in the past (i.e. been useful to the past generations which led to this trait being past on over and over again) For your purposes, the way to use this to your advantage and to activate it in a positive sense so it guides your customer to a conversion is to implement visual & auditory cues in your VSL that mirror the goal and desire/outcome they so deeply desire. this can be done by the language you use (copy), visuals/b roll etc. this will overlap with prefrontal–striatal loops as conscious intent ≈ 72 % making your customer already feel and get a grasp of their desires This is where belief and proofs come in, they all go hand in hand and strengthen the end goal (to buy). _____ also another note for the unique angle, drop off of CVRs happens also when a customer gets sight of a familiar stimulus in a VSL/offer (could be anything) even if they don't think of it consciously, the brain processes everything happening which is directed to be a data point for thought, through a memory check and relation test. If in the past, you had a bad experience with that stimulus, or something similar. The brain will count the offer as invalid with the outcome of lowering belief and seeing the future outcome as achievable. _______ more data on this inside also one of the biggest needle movers is tension in VSLs, include that in everything. 🥂
1:10

yall think black hat sauce is methods wtf do you think is the base for those methods? It's making them believe and feel false realities > If you want real black hat alpha, this is it. YOU WANT your VSLs or marketing campaigns to have a high CVR, AOV & retention (mrr in the backend) black hat methods get to these means in many ways like (fake authority using ai for clebs, back end mrr, fake promises, etc) >> however you can overcome the need for all of this while getting the same end results by just curating the reality of the VSL and experience in general to fit what those methods would have done. like for example - how would we be able to invoke a first time experience ecstasy of emotion in a vsl? > not only will this make the experience of the ad unique but also give you a platform to create a real authority figure that matches the belief of a cleb. from my experience I've found the way to do this is visually, auditorily, and ofc with your creatives. As yall know for my VSLs I try to take very unique different angles, with very specific visuals that back it up. and if you have trouble with this, you're literally in the perfect time in the world. You can use sora 2, put in your theme & ideas and ask it to be creative, include 100 different shots/scenes (add a aesthetic source image to make the generations 100x better) and boom. You have so many different frames and angles to get inspired by. > Also with MRR, you know one neurochemical that boosts the fuck out of CVR & retention? makes you trust more in a offer, promise, and changes your consciousness in ways that subsequently makes you spend more? its oxytocin. best example that I always use. the Charity water VSL (search up on yt). $700m off of MRR how? because of how touching and deep it hit. those types of narratives and experiences is what secretes oxytocin. And that's one legit real way you can boost your mrr and keep it long term if your angle is tied in a way to keep eliciting that reaction. It can be for any offer or product, happy or sad (best to stick with happy unless for a charity vsl like this one, or if yk what you're doing). > However remember one chemical change doesn't mean everything. There are tons of different states of mind you can put someone in, but they won't led to the results you want unless you include Specifics (on the offer, promises, and social proofs/belief elements) A big idea & unique angle and a proposition that ties in the creative --> to a reason showing that they NEED to buy this offer for whatever reason. >>> these changes and efforts we go to make a VSL work, doesn't pull it's weight & potential if we don't see it through a lens of economic game theory. over the last 28 years or so "several lines of experimentation have discovered that our goal- directed behaviors can be under “unconscious control” (Custers & Aarts, 2010)" The unconscious mind is the foundation for all your customers actions, they act because the deeper sections of their brains pick up a cue run it through memory, and pre biologically embedded risk/reward and elimination scenarios to see if this new stimuli is similar/relevant to past stimuli that has aided in spreading it's genes in the past (i.e. been useful to the past generations which led to this trait being past on over and over again) For your purposes, the way to use this to your advantage and to activate it in a positive sense so it guides your customer to a conversion is to implement visual & auditory cues in your VSL that mirror the goal and desire/outcome they so deeply desire. this can be done by the language you use (copy), visuals/b roll etc. this will overlap with prefrontal–striatal loops as conscious intent ≈ 72 % making your customer already feel and get a grasp of their desires This is where belief and proofs come in, they all go hand in hand and strengthen the end goal (to buy). _____ also another note for the unique angle, drop off of CVRs happens also when a customer gets sight of a familiar stimulus in a VSL/offer (could be anything) even if they don't think of it consciously, the brain processes everything happening which is directed to be a data point for thought, through a memory check and relation test. If in the past, you had a bad experience with that stimulus, or something similar. The brain will count the offer as invalid with the outcome of lowering belief and seeing the future outcome as achievable. _______ more data on this inside also one of the biggest needle movers is tension in VSLs, include that in everything. 🥂

Krma

37,202 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The most serious conversation they had was over Filipo the Fish 😂🤣 (this is a long one 🤪) Z: No Amore No! S: Filipo would be better in the sea in Napoli Z: ok Amordi, I know but Filipo is my son S: where did you awure this fish? Z: my mum took Filipo when Filipo was little from somewhere S: from where? It’s giving finding Nemo from Napoli Z: no! From the bad people S: you know finding Nemo? Z: No S: I know you’re the little girl with the teeth Z: I’m not the little girl, no! S: the little girl in the dentist, you know the one in the dentist Z: yeah, I know, you was this girl S: you with Filipo Z: Filipo is my mum’s not mine S: you just said he’s your son Z: yes but it’s not my fault S: Is he yours or not Z: and Filipo died if my mum um.. didn’t take Filipo S: ok, i agree with this but i was just saying, the fish literally spends it’s life looking like its going to hope out of the tank any given moment Z: ok, but Filipo is happy with us, I’m sure S: Get Filipo a brother or sister maybe Z: my brother S maybe you get Filipo a brother Z no no because I amore, amore, I had Cheto, S, i think like, Z but Cheto died Z but replace Cheto, Cheto died S: like at the end of the day I don’t think there is much difference between one fish, two fish, all the fish the same Amore. Ok cause all you do with the fish is just chuck the food and then goodbye Z: you asked me these S: I’ll buy you a fish l, Z yes. S, I will but you a fish ok, what do you want me to call it? Z: I don’t want another fish S: what difference does it make at this point. It’s not hard to look after a fish, you just chuck in the food Z: so you want that Filipo died in the sea S: No no i said get Filipo a friend Z: I had Cheto the friend of Filipo l, but Cheto died S: exactly, so get a new Cheto Z: no new Cheto, cause the same as Filipo not good S: oh right. #zeudiners #zarlet #zeudi
2:26

The most serious conversation they had was over Filipo the Fish 😂🤣 (this is a long one 🤪) Z: No Amore No! S: Filipo would be better in the sea in Napoli Z: ok Amordi, I know but Filipo is my son S: where did you awure this fish? Z: my mum took Filipo when Filipo was little from somewhere S: from where? It’s giving finding Nemo from Napoli Z: no! From the bad people S: you know finding Nemo? Z: No S: I know you’re the little girl with the teeth Z: I’m not the little girl, no! S: the little girl in the dentist, you know the one in the dentist Z: yeah, I know, you was this girl S: you with Filipo Z: Filipo is my mum’s not mine S: you just said he’s your son Z: yes but it’s not my fault S: Is he yours or not Z: and Filipo died if my mum um.. didn’t take Filipo S: ok, i agree with this but i was just saying, the fish literally spends it’s life looking like its going to hope out of the tank any given moment Z: ok, but Filipo is happy with us, I’m sure S: Get Filipo a brother or sister maybe Z: my brother S maybe you get Filipo a brother Z no no because I amore, amore, I had Cheto, S, i think like, Z but Cheto died Z but replace Cheto, Cheto died S: like at the end of the day I don’t think there is much difference between one fish, two fish, all the fish the same Amore. Ok cause all you do with the fish is just chuck the food and then goodbye Z: you asked me these S: I’ll buy you a fish l, Z yes. S, I will but you a fish ok, what do you want me to call it? Z: I don’t want another fish S: what difference does it make at this point. It’s not hard to look after a fish, you just chuck in the food Z: so you want that Filipo died in the sea S: No no i said get Filipo a friend Z: I had Cheto the friend of Filipo l, but Cheto died S: exactly, so get a new Cheto Z: no new Cheto, cause the same as Filipo not good S: oh right. #zeudiners #zarlet #zeudi

Suave (ZeZe) 🌈 🦄

54,229 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Oh sweetheart… I really hoped we wouldn’t have to do this. Especially on Thanksgiving Eve. But since you’ve decided to publicly rewrite history with your little meltdown today, buckle up. We’re taking a field trip into the saga of one of the many bargain-bin ratchets my ex cheated on me with. Let’s begin. Back in May, YOU Chelsea slid into my Facebook messages out of nowhere (Screen Recording 1), foaming at the mouth because you thought I sent you a friend request. I have over 2,000 pending requests. If I accidentally tapped yours while scrolling, congratulations on the high point of your decade. Your hostile meltdown over a friend request was… honestly, a medical red flag. So I blocked you. Naturally, you slithered over to Twitter next (Screen Recording 2) because you were blocked on Facebook. At this point I’m thinking, “Why is this woman obsessed with me over a friend request?” I’d asked my friends if they knew you, they had no clue. I asked Aidan if he knew who you were. Aidan told me you were just a fan, a nobody. I asked why you’d send me these weird messages, “He has a lot of crazy fans and gets tons of crazy messages,” he said. And wow, did you prove that correct. I blocked you there too. End of story… until it wasn’t. Fast forward to June 18. I discovered you were sexting Aidan in April during a break we had. Gross, but whatever. We stayed together a bit longer before officially breaking up in July. A week later, an account magically appears: Mere’s Diary. Posting vomit about me and the breakup, a breakup nobody knew about yet. And who was this brand-new hate account tagging? Your tiny burner account. The one with no followers. That nobody else could possibly know existed. What an incredible coincidence. Almost miraculous. And like divine intervention, the account vanished the second it was brought to Aidan’s attention. Shocking. Fast-forward to today, I finish work, and here you are– proudly teaming up with the Ratchet Voldemort Squad, posting random screenshots, private conversations, and whatever scraps Aidan tossed you to weaponize against me. Cute hobby. And the icing? I checked my spam folder and found more messages from you on 11/6/25 at 4:04 AM (Screen Recording 3), threatening to “be your worst fucking nightmare.” You know what’s really scary? Your sleep schedule. Yet somehow I’m the one being accused of stalking YOU? Girl. You can’t even lie convincingly. Let’s talk about these “unknown calls”: Let’s see actual proof you received them, because you should absolutely be contacting police if someone is allegedly calling you thousands of times. Way more effective than sending deranged 4am threats that sat in my spam folder til today. Show proof I had anything to do with them. Spoiler: you can’t. Because I didn’t. And because you’re lying. The extent of my communications with you is right here in the screen recordings. That’s it. That’s the whole story. Everything else is just your delusion dressed up as content. Let me recap this for the people in the back: • YOU messaged ME first, unprovoked. • YOU harassed me over a friend request I probably tapped by accident. • YOU made a fake account about me to tag YOURSELF with. • YOU have been switching accounts like it’s a buy-one-get-one special. • And now YOU are doing Aidan’s dirty work, because apparently you’re ratchet #3 in the rotation this week. I’ve never publicly discussed Aidan’s cheating because, unlike you, I have dignity. Despite all the one-sided screenshots that have leaked, painting a very inaccurate picture of a private relationship, I haven't shared any of his messages or fought back. But since one of the Dollar Tree side chicks is now trying to rewrite my life for clout, here we are. I hope people are starting to realize that I’m not the one instigating any of this as I’d really rather keep private things private. Almost like this little “Temu Storm” of gutter muppets is coordinated on behalf of someone who wants to paint himself as the victim. I offered to “take that walk” with the ratchet who eats paper and the ratchet who suddenly became beloved this week after faking rape for a year, but apparently they sent the understudy instead. Anyway, Chelsea—keep posting your random, context-free screenshots. Keep playing the victim. Keep pretending you’re being terrorized by someone who doesn’t even have your phone number. But before you claim 2,000 calls again, maybe — just maybe — show a single shred of proof. I’ll wait, bitch. PS-I feel like tonight is the perfect time to premiere Jess’s new video. Spoiler alert- it’ll be way better than the one Kate made.
0:23

Oh sweetheart… I really hoped we wouldn’t have to do this. Especially on Thanksgiving Eve. But since you’ve decided to publicly rewrite history with your little meltdown today, buckle up. We’re taking a field trip into the saga of one of the many bargain-bin ratchets my ex cheated on me with. Let’s begin. Back in May, YOU Chelsea slid into my Facebook messages out of nowhere (Screen Recording 1), foaming at the mouth because you thought I sent you a friend request. I have over 2,000 pending requests. If I accidentally tapped yours while scrolling, congratulations on the high point of your decade. Your hostile meltdown over a friend request was… honestly, a medical red flag. So I blocked you. Naturally, you slithered over to Twitter next (Screen Recording 2) because you were blocked on Facebook. At this point I’m thinking, “Why is this woman obsessed with me over a friend request?” I’d asked my friends if they knew you, they had no clue. I asked Aidan if he knew who you were. Aidan told me you were just a fan, a nobody. I asked why you’d send me these weird messages, “He has a lot of crazy fans and gets tons of crazy messages,” he said. And wow, did you prove that correct. I blocked you there too. End of story… until it wasn’t. Fast forward to June 18. I discovered you were sexting Aidan in April during a break we had. Gross, but whatever. We stayed together a bit longer before officially breaking up in July. A week later, an account magically appears: Mere’s Diary. Posting vomit about me and the breakup, a breakup nobody knew about yet. And who was this brand-new hate account tagging? Your tiny burner account. The one with no followers. That nobody else could possibly know existed. What an incredible coincidence. Almost miraculous. And like divine intervention, the account vanished the second it was brought to Aidan’s attention. Shocking. Fast-forward to today, I finish work, and here you are– proudly teaming up with the Ratchet Voldemort Squad, posting random screenshots, private conversations, and whatever scraps Aidan tossed you to weaponize against me. Cute hobby. And the icing? I checked my spam folder and found more messages from you on 11/6/25 at 4:04 AM (Screen Recording 3), threatening to “be your worst fucking nightmare.” You know what’s really scary? Your sleep schedule. Yet somehow I’m the one being accused of stalking YOU? Girl. You can’t even lie convincingly. Let’s talk about these “unknown calls”: Let’s see actual proof you received them, because you should absolutely be contacting police if someone is allegedly calling you thousands of times. Way more effective than sending deranged 4am threats that sat in my spam folder til today. Show proof I had anything to do with them. Spoiler: you can’t. Because I didn’t. And because you’re lying. The extent of my communications with you is right here in the screen recordings. That’s it. That’s the whole story. Everything else is just your delusion dressed up as content. Let me recap this for the people in the back: • YOU messaged ME first, unprovoked. • YOU harassed me over a friend request I probably tapped by accident. • YOU made a fake account about me to tag YOURSELF with. • YOU have been switching accounts like it’s a buy-one-get-one special. • And now YOU are doing Aidan’s dirty work, because apparently you’re ratchet #3 in the rotation this week. I’ve never publicly discussed Aidan’s cheating because, unlike you, I have dignity. Despite all the one-sided screenshots that have leaked, painting a very inaccurate picture of a private relationship, I haven't shared any of his messages or fought back. But since one of the Dollar Tree side chicks is now trying to rewrite my life for clout, here we are. I hope people are starting to realize that I’m not the one instigating any of this as I’d really rather keep private things private. Almost like this little “Temu Storm” of gutter muppets is coordinated on behalf of someone who wants to paint himself as the victim. I offered to “take that walk” with the ratchet who eats paper and the ratchet who suddenly became beloved this week after faking rape for a year, but apparently they sent the understudy instead. Anyway, Chelsea—keep posting your random, context-free screenshots. Keep playing the victim. Keep pretending you’re being terrorized by someone who doesn’t even have your phone number. But before you claim 2,000 calls again, maybe — just maybe — show a single shred of proof. I’ll wait, bitch. PS-I feel like tonight is the perfect time to premiere Jess’s new video. Spoiler alert- it’ll be way better than the one Kate made.

The old M can’t come to the phone right now

1,196,178 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Skills are the quickest way to 10x the quality and consistency of what you get from Claude Code. And you don't need to be a developer to use them. Anthropic just published how they use hundreds of skills internally every day. Most skill tutorials are made for developers — if you're in marketing, sales, content ops, or GTM, you probably watched those and moved on. But skills are just as important for non-developers. A skill is just a reusable prompt with clear instructions for a specific task. Instead of prompting Claude the same way over and over, you build it once and invoke it every time. I have a skill for writing on LinkedIn. A different one for YouTube outlines. Another for X. Each platform has different rules, different voice, different structure — so each one gets its own skill. If you're doing something repeatedly, it's time to make a skill. The biggest mistake most people make: building skills as a single .md file. A single file dumps everything into context whether Claude needs it or not. Wastes tokens. Gets worse results. Skills should be folders. Here's the structure that works: skill.md — the orchestrator. Tells Claude which files to read and when. It doesn't contain rules itself — it's the playbook. instructions/ — separate files for voice, structure, scope. Claude only loads the one it needs for the current step. examples/ — good AND bad. Good examples show what success looks like. Bad examples show patterns to avoid — AI writing tells, weak hooks, generic CTAs. Most people skip bad examples. Don't. eval/ — a checklist that scores every output before you see it. "Does it have a clear hook?" "Is it free of AI buzzwords?" Pass or fail on each item. templates/ — output formatting so you get consistent structure every time. The three types of skills that matter most for non-developers: 1. Business automation. Writing a newsletter. Checking reports and drafting follow-ups. Running programmatic ad campaigns. Any workflow you repeat — build a skill for it. 2. Content templates. Landing page copy, meta ads, email sequences, SEO briefs. Each one has specific requirements. Each one gets its own skill. 3. Thinking partners. This is the one people miss. Skills don't have to produce output. They can help you think — an advisory board that reviews your work from your ICP's perspective, a coach that pressure-tests your strategy, an ideation partner that researches competitors before suggesting your next move. If you already have skills as .md files, here's the exact prompt to restructure them in the Anthropic approved format: "I want to restructure my Claude Code skill file. Right now my skill is a single .md file and I want to break it into a folder system following Anthropic's best practices. Read my current skill file, then restructure it into a folder with: a skill.md orchestrator, an instructions/ folder with separate files for each concern (voice, structure, scope), an examples/ folder with good and bad examples, an eval/ folder with a quality checklist, and a templates/ folder for output formatting. Keep all my existing rules and intent — just reorganize them into the modular structure." Paste that into Claude Code pointed at the folder where your skill lives. It handles the rest. A few caveats: 1. Don't add too many skills. Every skill adds context Claude has to process. 50 skills loaded means everything slows down. Start with 3-5 covering your most repeated workflows. 2. Vet skills before downloading. If you grab a skill from the internet, read what's inside first. Skills can include shell commands and scripts. Check what you're running. 3. Share what works. Build a skill that performs well, put it in a shared GitHub repo. Your marketing org gets shared skills for copywriting, SEO, ad copy — new hires invoke the skill instead of learning every playbook from scratch. Onboarding time drops dramatically. 4. Keep your skills updated. When you see output you love, add it as a good example. When you see a pattern you hate, add it as a bad example. The skill gets sharper every time. I made a full video walking through all of this — including a live build of two skills from scratch (no terminal, no code), the exact prompt I use to restructure old skills, and 5 pro tips from Anthropic's internal playbook. Share this with your non-developer friends that want to do more with AI; or bookmark it to come back to at a later time.
25:52

Skills are the quickest way to 10x the quality and consistency of what you get from Claude Code. And you don't need to be a developer to use them. Anthropic just published how they use hundreds of skills internally every day. Most skill tutorials are made for developers — if you're in marketing, sales, content ops, or GTM, you probably watched those and moved on. But skills are just as important for non-developers. A skill is just a reusable prompt with clear instructions for a specific task. Instead of prompting Claude the same way over and over, you build it once and invoke it every time. I have a skill for writing on LinkedIn. A different one for YouTube outlines. Another for X. Each platform has different rules, different voice, different structure — so each one gets its own skill. If you're doing something repeatedly, it's time to make a skill. The biggest mistake most people make: building skills as a single .md file. A single file dumps everything into context whether Claude needs it or not. Wastes tokens. Gets worse results. Skills should be folders. Here's the structure that works: skill.md — the orchestrator. Tells Claude which files to read and when. It doesn't contain rules itself — it's the playbook. instructions/ — separate files for voice, structure, scope. Claude only loads the one it needs for the current step. examples/ — good AND bad. Good examples show what success looks like. Bad examples show patterns to avoid — AI writing tells, weak hooks, generic CTAs. Most people skip bad examples. Don't. eval/ — a checklist that scores every output before you see it. "Does it have a clear hook?" "Is it free of AI buzzwords?" Pass or fail on each item. templates/ — output formatting so you get consistent structure every time. The three types of skills that matter most for non-developers: 1. Business automation. Writing a newsletter. Checking reports and drafting follow-ups. Running programmatic ad campaigns. Any workflow you repeat — build a skill for it. 2. Content templates. Landing page copy, meta ads, email sequences, SEO briefs. Each one has specific requirements. Each one gets its own skill. 3. Thinking partners. This is the one people miss. Skills don't have to produce output. They can help you think — an advisory board that reviews your work from your ICP's perspective, a coach that pressure-tests your strategy, an ideation partner that researches competitors before suggesting your next move. If you already have skills as .md files, here's the exact prompt to restructure them in the Anthropic approved format: "I want to restructure my Claude Code skill file. Right now my skill is a single .md file and I want to break it into a folder system following Anthropic's best practices. Read my current skill file, then restructure it into a folder with: a skill.md orchestrator, an instructions/ folder with separate files for each concern (voice, structure, scope), an examples/ folder with good and bad examples, an eval/ folder with a quality checklist, and a templates/ folder for output formatting. Keep all my existing rules and intent — just reorganize them into the modular structure." Paste that into Claude Code pointed at the folder where your skill lives. It handles the rest. A few caveats: 1. Don't add too many skills. Every skill adds context Claude has to process. 50 skills loaded means everything slows down. Start with 3-5 covering your most repeated workflows. 2. Vet skills before downloading. If you grab a skill from the internet, read what's inside first. Skills can include shell commands and scripts. Check what you're running. 3. Share what works. Build a skill that performs well, put it in a shared GitHub repo. Your marketing org gets shared skills for copywriting, SEO, ad copy — new hires invoke the skill instead of learning every playbook from scratch. Onboarding time drops dramatically. 4. Keep your skills updated. When you see output you love, add it as a good example. When you see a pattern you hate, add it as a bad example. The skill gets sharper every time. I made a full video walking through all of this — including a live build of two skills from scratch (no terminal, no code), the exact prompt I use to restructure old skills, and 5 pro tips from Anthropic's internal playbook. Share this with your non-developer friends that want to do more with AI; or bookmark it to come back to at a later time.

JJ Englert

29,322 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IS ISRAEL DRAGGING THE U.S. INTO ANOTHER FOREVER WAR? This debate between Cenk Uygur and IDF’s Jonathan Conricus got very very heated. I’ve never seen Cenk so upset The discussion started with a focus on the imminent war with Iran, and whether it is in America’s best interest Iran cannot reach the U.S. mainland with its missiles, does not have a nuclear weapon despite decades of warnings the country is on the verge of one, and has made it clear it does not want a war with the U.S. Cenk argues the Israeli lobby is the reason the U.S. is about to start a new war Jonathan disagrees, criticizing those who blame Israel for everything. In his view, Iran is building a nuclear weapon, as well as ballistic missiles that can reach the U.S., and has a history of destabilizing the region while killing U.S. servicemen through their proxies. The debate then moves to Israeli policy in the region, and the future of Gaza and the West Bank, and this is where it gets very emotional. Jonathan does not believe in a two-state solution, and Cenk equates that with genocide, asking one question: What will happen to the Palestinians if they do not accept to be integrated into Israel? Watch the full debate below with @jconricus0 and Cenk Uygur below. 03:00 - War nearly guaranteed, U.S. military buildup largest since Iraq, Israel controlling US policy 06:02 - Israel’s three “reasons” for war: nukes, missiles, foreign policy... none serve US interests 09:20 - Iranian people’s protests ignored; focus should be on their freedom, not regime 12:40 - Iranian regime’s threat: nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, proxy wars 16:15 - US has historic chance to reshape Middle East, reduce Iranian terror influence 19:50 - Critique of US politicians prioritizing Israel over Americans; 80% oppose war 23:30 - Israel blamed for pushing US into wars repeatedly; weapons of mass destruction parallels 27:15 - Jonathan argues Iran threatens Israel; discussion of Iranian missile capabilities 31:00 - Israel’s defense role vs US leadership in the region; Iran-China-Russia tech cooperation 34:45 - Extremist insurgencies likely if Iran invaded; past examples Iraq & Afghanistan 38:20 - Israel’s “Greater Israel” ambitions and annexations; impact on Palestinians 41:50 - Historical context: 1948 Nakba and ethnic cleansing accusations revisited 45:30 - Debate over Palestinian resistance vs Israeli self-defense; moral questions raised 49:10 - US public largely against war; Israel benefits more than America from regime collapse 52:45 - Peace offers to Palestinians rejected multiple times; Israel insists on defense 55:30 - Current Israeli strategy: annexation, control over Judea & Samaria, handling 5.5M Palestinians
57:25

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IS ISRAEL DRAGGING THE U.S. INTO ANOTHER FOREVER WAR? This debate between Cenk Uygur and IDF’s Jonathan Conricus got very very heated. I’ve never seen Cenk so upset The discussion started with a focus on the imminent war with Iran, and whether it is in America’s best interest Iran cannot reach the U.S. mainland with its missiles, does not have a nuclear weapon despite decades of warnings the country is on the verge of one, and has made it clear it does not want a war with the U.S. Cenk argues the Israeli lobby is the reason the U.S. is about to start a new war Jonathan disagrees, criticizing those who blame Israel for everything. In his view, Iran is building a nuclear weapon, as well as ballistic missiles that can reach the U.S., and has a history of destabilizing the region while killing U.S. servicemen through their proxies. The debate then moves to Israeli policy in the region, and the future of Gaza and the West Bank, and this is where it gets very emotional. Jonathan does not believe in a two-state solution, and Cenk equates that with genocide, asking one question: What will happen to the Palestinians if they do not accept to be integrated into Israel? Watch the full debate below with @jconricus0 and Cenk Uygur below. 03:00 - War nearly guaranteed, U.S. military buildup largest since Iraq, Israel controlling US policy 06:02 - Israel’s three “reasons” for war: nukes, missiles, foreign policy... none serve US interests 09:20 - Iranian people’s protests ignored; focus should be on their freedom, not regime 12:40 - Iranian regime’s threat: nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, proxy wars 16:15 - US has historic chance to reshape Middle East, reduce Iranian terror influence 19:50 - Critique of US politicians prioritizing Israel over Americans; 80% oppose war 23:30 - Israel blamed for pushing US into wars repeatedly; weapons of mass destruction parallels 27:15 - Jonathan argues Iran threatens Israel; discussion of Iranian missile capabilities 31:00 - Israel’s defense role vs US leadership in the region; Iran-China-Russia tech cooperation 34:45 - Extremist insurgencies likely if Iran invaded; past examples Iraq & Afghanistan 38:20 - Israel’s “Greater Israel” ambitions and annexations; impact on Palestinians 41:50 - Historical context: 1948 Nakba and ethnic cleansing accusations revisited 45:30 - Debate over Palestinian resistance vs Israeli self-defense; moral questions raised 49:10 - US public largely against war; Israel benefits more than America from regime collapse 52:45 - Peace offers to Palestinians rejected multiple times; Israel insists on defense 55:30 - Current Israeli strategy: annexation, control over Judea & Samaria, handling 5.5M Palestinians

Mario Nawfal

521,913 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад