Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

New bottle. Same stink. Same cowardice. Deepak Mhaskey, BJP’s brand-new IT Cell chief, sat on live TV and denied that he or his co-convenors had anything to hide. Then he disconnected the moment the questions got specific. Right after the 17 August appointment, his own X timeline was scraped...

GuptaPragnya's profile picture

Pragnya Gupta

32,826 subscribers

79,372 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

KomediHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

There are only Two words in Abhijeet Dipke's Dictionary. One is "Youth" and another is very famous "Gen-Z". Abhijeet Dipke says that Modi ji is too old to understand Gen Z and he doesn't know the language of Gen Z. But then the same Abhijeet Dipke says that on 15th August, Modi ji should address only Gen Z. I don't understand this logic of "Modi ji doesn't understand Gen-Z language. Do Gen-Z speaks some language that is related to some Aliens and some other planet?? If you really believe that the Prime Minister cannot connect with Gen Z, then why are you asking him to make Gen Z the main focus of his Independence Day speech? 15th August is India's Independence Day. The Prime Minister speaks to the entire nation. students, young people, parents, farmers, workers, soldiers, business owners, and senior citizens. Every Indian is equally important. If the PM talks about policies for young people, that's completely fine. But expecting him to ignore everyone else and make the entire speech only about Gen Z doesn't make sense. First you say he cannot connect with Gen Z. Then you demand that he should speak mainly to Gen Z. At least be consistent with your own argument. CJP's whole agendas is running around one word "Gen-Z".
0:37

There are only Two words in Abhijeet Dipke's Dictionary. One is "Youth" and another is very famous "Gen-Z". Abhijeet Dipke says that Modi ji is too old to understand Gen Z and he doesn't know the language of Gen Z. But then the same Abhijeet Dipke says that on 15th August, Modi ji should address only Gen Z. I don't understand this logic of "Modi ji doesn't understand Gen-Z language. Do Gen-Z speaks some language that is related to some Aliens and some other planet?? If you really believe that the Prime Minister cannot connect with Gen Z, then why are you asking him to make Gen Z the main focus of his Independence Day speech? 15th August is India's Independence Day. The Prime Minister speaks to the entire nation. students, young people, parents, farmers, workers, soldiers, business owners, and senior citizens. Every Indian is equally important. If the PM talks about policies for young people, that's completely fine. But expecting him to ignore everyone else and make the entire speech only about Gen Z doesn't make sense. First you say he cannot connect with Gen Z. Then you demand that he should speak mainly to Gen Z. At least be consistent with your own argument. CJP's whole agendas is running around one word "Gen-Z".

Aditya

19,074 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

In Padua, I sat with a psychiatrist, a radiologist, and a man who has been in this fight since 1991. The psychiatrist started treating COVID vaccine injury and is getting results with augmented NAC and other protocols. What she also sees is the effect on children. A generation now questioning vaccines, carrying that uncertainty, and what it is doing to mental health across Italian society. She is watching it all from a clinical chair. The radiologist had no objection to the vaccine - his objection was to being told he had no choice. He made that position public, lost his job, and has been living with the consequences since. He is back now but the reinstatement didn't change the pressure. He channeled it into leading one of the major organizations here that funds people who stood their ground for the same reason. The third man refused to vaccinate his child in 1991 and the Italian government tried to take his children from him. He has been running the country's largest vaccine choice organization ever since. You realize, talking to people like this, that the ocean between us is not as wide as it looks. We have the same fight, same costs, and its the same people refusing to let it go.
1:12

In Padua, I sat with a psychiatrist, a radiologist, and a man who has been in this fight since 1991. The psychiatrist started treating COVID vaccine injury and is getting results with augmented NAC and other protocols. What she also sees is the effect on children. A generation now questioning vaccines, carrying that uncertainty, and what it is doing to mental health across Italian society. She is watching it all from a clinical chair. The radiologist had no objection to the vaccine - his objection was to being told he had no choice. He made that position public, lost his job, and has been living with the consequences since. He is back now but the reinstatement didn't change the pressure. He channeled it into leading one of the major organizations here that funds people who stood their ground for the same reason. The third man refused to vaccinate his child in 1991 and the Italian government tried to take his children from him. He has been running the country's largest vaccine choice organization ever since. You realize, talking to people like this, that the ocean between us is not as wide as it looks. We have the same fight, same costs, and its the same people refusing to let it go.

Del Bigtree

22,258 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

‼️BREAKING: New UVU Tunnel Security Footage Shows Terryl Farnsworth Inserting The SD Card Into His Laptop👀 Candace just dropped never-before-seen surveillance video from the tunnel at UVU that raises major new questions about Terryl Farnsworth’s actions on September 10th. In the footage, Terryl is seen taking the SD card out of his pocket and inserting it into his laptop while nervously looking around. The entire time he is texting or talking with someone on his phone. After securing the cards, why did he feel the need to immediately plug them into his computer? Was he making a private copy? Who was he communicating with in that moment, and was he following orders? This is the same man who removed the camera behind Charlie’s head less than four minutes after the shot. The more footage that surfaces, the more his behavior demands answers. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
0:50

‼️BREAKING: New UVU Tunnel Security Footage Shows Terryl Farnsworth Inserting The SD Card Into His Laptop👀 Candace just dropped never-before-seen surveillance video from the tunnel at UVU that raises major new questions about Terryl Farnsworth’s actions on September 10th. In the footage, Terryl is seen taking the SD card out of his pocket and inserting it into his laptop while nervously looking around. The entire time he is texting or talking with someone on his phone. After securing the cards, why did he feel the need to immediately plug them into his computer? Was he making a private copy? Who was he communicating with in that moment, and was he following orders? This is the same man who removed the camera behind Charlie’s head less than four minutes after the shot. The more footage that surfaces, the more his behavior demands answers. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

342,168 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

A 18 YEAR OLD HIT 7.4 MILLION VIEWS WITH ONE AI GIRL WHO NEVER STOPS MOVING He built her in 11 days. Same face. Same body. Same little smile. The trick was never the face. It was the switch. She starts in the green sequin top, covers her mouth, flips her hair, then the moment her hand crosses the lens the outfit is already the American flag one. No still frame. No cut people can catch. Two frames later she is in the blue one in a different room. Most creators still hard-cut on a frozen pose and the algorithm kills it. He made the change happen while she was already in motion so the loop feels continuous. He almost quit after 8 days of 90-view posts. Then he locked the seed, locked the body proportions, locked the exact nail length and the two tattoos, and started dropping the same girl in new rooms every day. One clip did 7.4 million views in 36 hours. 21,300 new followers. The top comment is still arguing about where she got the second bikini. He answers every single comment in under 70 seconds with an agent that remembers what each guy said three days ago. That alone converts better than the video. She has a $12 private page. 340 guys pay monthly just to keep talking to the same face that never sleeps. The girl is the bait. The seamless switch and the 70-second replies are the machine. Watch the hand cross the frame one more time. You already missed the change.
0:28

A 18 YEAR OLD HIT 7.4 MILLION VIEWS WITH ONE AI GIRL WHO NEVER STOPS MOVING He built her in 11 days. Same face. Same body. Same little smile. The trick was never the face. It was the switch. She starts in the green sequin top, covers her mouth, flips her hair, then the moment her hand crosses the lens the outfit is already the American flag one. No still frame. No cut people can catch. Two frames later she is in the blue one in a different room. Most creators still hard-cut on a frozen pose and the algorithm kills it. He made the change happen while she was already in motion so the loop feels continuous. He almost quit after 8 days of 90-view posts. Then he locked the seed, locked the body proportions, locked the exact nail length and the two tattoos, and started dropping the same girl in new rooms every day. One clip did 7.4 million views in 36 hours. 21,300 new followers. The top comment is still arguing about where she got the second bikini. He answers every single comment in under 70 seconds with an agent that remembers what each guy said three days ago. That alone converts better than the video. She has a $12 private page. 340 guys pay monthly just to keep talking to the same face that never sleeps. The girl is the bait. The seamless switch and the 70-second replies are the machine. Watch the hand cross the frame one more time. You already missed the change.

Mango

588,864 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Former 49ers long snapper Taybor Pepper gives his thoughts on the Jake Moody situation: “I think this offseason the new ST coach came in, he probably did what he felt was right, but the way I look at it: 1. A coaching change is a big change to begin with for any specialist. 2. He took away Jake’s entire support system in that room. You got two new coaches, the ST coordinator and his assistant, and then you get rid of his snapper and his holder in the same year? That’s tough.” 🎥: Nik Atanackovic
5:56

Former 49ers long snapper Taybor Pepper gives his thoughts on the Jake Moody situation: “I think this offseason the new ST coach came in, he probably did what he felt was right, but the way I look at it: 1. A coaching change is a big change to begin with for any specialist. 2. He took away Jake’s entire support system in that room. You got two new coaches, the ST coordinator and his assistant, and then you get rid of his snapper and his holder in the same year? That’s tough.” 🎥: Nik Atanackovic

Coach Yac 🗣

360,000 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Sudhir Chaudhary asked BJP’s new IT Cell chief Deepak Mhaske the question everyone wanted: > "How will you take on the CJP & its style of operation?" Mhaske refused to treat it as a street fight. If a page raises issues, answer them. That is democracy. Do not turn every exchange into a contest. He also addressed the harder point. > Crude, low-brow content travels faster. The cheaper the language, the quicker it goes viral. His reply was simple. FRIVOLOUS content can grab a headline for a day. Facts last longer. Lies have no legs. That is the uncommon line from the new IT chief. Not matching abuse with abuse. Waiting for the noise to fade and letting the record remain.
5:46

Sudhir Chaudhary asked BJP’s new IT Cell chief Deepak Mhaske the question everyone wanted: > "How will you take on the CJP & its style of operation?" Mhaske refused to treat it as a street fight. If a page raises issues, answer them. That is democracy. Do not turn every exchange into a contest. He also addressed the harder point. > Crude, low-brow content travels faster. The cheaper the language, the quicker it goes viral. His reply was simple. FRIVOLOUS content can grab a headline for a day. Facts last longer. Lies have no legs. That is the uncommon line from the new IT chief. Not matching abuse with abuse. Waiting for the noise to fade and letting the record remain.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

159,674 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: New UVU Surveillance Footage Shows the Alleged Assassin Had TWO Phones — Plus One Minute Of The Video SUSPICIOUSLY Cut.🤔 New analysis of the UVU parking garage and stairwell surveillance footage raises major questions about the official story. The bulge in the individual’s pocket that many claimed was a rifle barrel appears to be a cell phone. You can clearly see him place a phone into his right pocket — yet something still remains in his left hand, suggesting he may have been carrying two phones. Even more concerning, approximately one full minute of the video appears to have been cut out during this sequence. Why was that portion removed, and what does it show? When the individual enters the parking garage, he stops and appears to look directly at a specific vehicle before heading up the stairwell. That same vehicle then stops, reverses, and appears to drive up to the next level. Was this person being watched or followed the entire time? These details don’t fit the lone-wolf narrative cleanly. The more footage that surfaces, the more questions emerge.
2:03

‼️BOMBSHELL: New UVU Surveillance Footage Shows the Alleged Assassin Had TWO Phones — Plus One Minute Of The Video SUSPICIOUSLY Cut.🤔 New analysis of the UVU parking garage and stairwell surveillance footage raises major questions about the official story. The bulge in the individual’s pocket that many claimed was a rifle barrel appears to be a cell phone. You can clearly see him place a phone into his right pocket — yet something still remains in his left hand, suggesting he may have been carrying two phones. Even more concerning, approximately one full minute of the video appears to have been cut out during this sequence. Why was that portion removed, and what does it show? When the individual enters the parking garage, he stops and appears to look directly at a specific vehicle before heading up the stairwell. That same vehicle then stops, reverses, and appears to drive up to the next level. Was this person being watched or followed the entire time? These details don’t fit the lone-wolf narrative cleanly. The more footage that surfaces, the more questions emerge.

Project Constitution

62,521 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 THIS MAN PROVES TYLER ROBINSON COULD NEVER HIDE A .30-06 RIFLE IN HIS PANTS - AND SHATTERS THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE This man just went viral after putting the official story to the test. He owns a nearly identical .30-06 rifle to the one allegedly used in the Charlie Kirk assassination. He’s 6’8” and 265 pounds. He tried stuffing it down his sweatpants. Result? The rifle runs the entire length of his leg and is completely obvious. Now look at the actual footage of Tyler Robinson walking up the stairs of the parking structure in skinny jeans. No bulge. No rigid outline. Nothing. Even if he somehow managed to hide it, he was only on that rooftop for less than two minutes. Not enough time to: • Pull it out • Assemble it • Take a perfect shot • Disassemble it • And make it vanish Yet the rifle supposedly disappeared without a trace. A full length hunting rifle… hidden in skinny jeans… assembled and gone in under two minutes. Does that sound possible to you? What do you think really happened on that rooftop?
4:02

🚨 THIS MAN PROVES TYLER ROBINSON COULD NEVER HIDE A .30-06 RIFLE IN HIS PANTS - AND SHATTERS THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE This man just went viral after putting the official story to the test. He owns a nearly identical .30-06 rifle to the one allegedly used in the Charlie Kirk assassination. He’s 6’8” and 265 pounds. He tried stuffing it down his sweatpants. Result? The rifle runs the entire length of his leg and is completely obvious. Now look at the actual footage of Tyler Robinson walking up the stairs of the parking structure in skinny jeans. No bulge. No rigid outline. Nothing. Even if he somehow managed to hide it, he was only on that rooftop for less than two minutes. Not enough time to: • Pull it out • Assemble it • Take a perfect shot • Disassemble it • And make it vanish Yet the rifle supposedly disappeared without a trace. A full length hunting rifle… hidden in skinny jeans… assembled and gone in under two minutes. Does that sound possible to you? What do you think really happened on that rooftop?

HustleBitch

20,796 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

‼️Charlie Kirk DIDN'T Buy the Butler Narrative — Candace Owens Says His Murder Is Much DARKER and May Involve the SAME People😱 Candace Owens responded by saying that while Charlie was right to question Butler, his own assassination is much darker. She pointed out the chilling reality that Erika Kirk offered raises to members of Charlie’s own security team after his death — the same pattern of rewarding people who failed to protect him. She also noted that Charlie repeatedly warned his audience to never stop asking questions… yet the organization he built is now actively trying to shut down any questioning of his assassination. Charlie didn’t buy the Butler narrative for a second. The question now is: Would he have bought the official story of his own murder? FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. Charlie told us to keep asking questions. We’re not stopping. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE HERE:
4:17

‼️Charlie Kirk DIDN'T Buy the Butler Narrative — Candace Owens Says His Murder Is Much DARKER and May Involve the SAME People😱 Candace Owens responded by saying that while Charlie was right to question Butler, his own assassination is much darker. She pointed out the chilling reality that Erika Kirk offered raises to members of Charlie’s own security team after his death — the same pattern of rewarding people who failed to protect him. She also noted that Charlie repeatedly warned his audience to never stop asking questions… yet the organization he built is now actively trying to shut down any questioning of his assassination. Charlie didn’t buy the Butler narrative for a second. The question now is: Would he have bought the official story of his own murder? FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. Charlie told us to keep asking questions. We’re not stopping. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE HERE:

Project Constitution

51,063 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Full coverage of Marc Lamont Hill and the JBP cast responding to DJ Akademiks 🎙️👇 Marc says Ak is right about one thing , he never claimed to be a hip hop journalist, so he doesn’t understand why Ak is now expecting him to break hip hop stories. That was never part of the job. On the “What’s the Dirt” video about Roc Nation , he’s watched it, and says even if everything in it is true, he doesn’t care enough to go investigate it himself. He’s locked in on the Nolan case right now. His question back to Ak: what exactly does he want him to do with the information once he has it? He says why would he fuck**g be afraid of Drake when he is the same guy who spoke against Israel at UN? Flip also called Dj Akademiks out , saying Ak has his own relationship with Drake but doesn’t want anyone else to have one with Jay-Z. He says people have the right to have relationships with Jay the same way he has one with Drake . Joe Budden agreed. The podcast then got into the bigger picture of all the beefs going on, with Joe pointing out Charlamagne started it all… then went quiet. Said he loves that. 👀
25:00

Full coverage of Marc Lamont Hill and the JBP cast responding to DJ Akademiks 🎙️👇 Marc says Ak is right about one thing , he never claimed to be a hip hop journalist, so he doesn’t understand why Ak is now expecting him to break hip hop stories. That was never part of the job. On the “What’s the Dirt” video about Roc Nation , he’s watched it, and says even if everything in it is true, he doesn’t care enough to go investigate it himself. He’s locked in on the Nolan case right now. His question back to Ak: what exactly does he want him to do with the information once he has it? He says why would he fuck**g be afraid of Drake when he is the same guy who spoke against Israel at UN? Flip also called Dj Akademiks out , saying Ak has his own relationship with Drake but doesn’t want anyone else to have one with Jay-Z. He says people have the right to have relationships with Jay the same way he has one with Drake . Joe Budden agreed. The podcast then got into the bigger picture of all the beefs going on, with Joe pointing out Charlamagne started it all… then went quiet. Said he loves that. 👀

Yawovi1986

38,266 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

🚨EXPOSED: Charlie Kirk's SECURITY LEAD Just Got CAUGHT RED-HANDED LYING On Sean Ryan's Show— Harpole Got EVERYTHING He Asked For… Then DEFAMED the Police Chief Anyway I agree with . Him and I were some of the only people to call this out the day the interview dropped. Almost nobody else did. Everyone just swallowed the “local PD failed us” narrative at face value. The failure was 100 % on the advance team that took “yes” from the chief, never followed up, never verified their own man was actually on that roof, and then pointed fingers everywhere else once Charlie was bleeding out. Protective details don’t get to outsource accountability. You own the mission or you own the coffin. How is this same guy and his team STILL protecting Erika Kirk to this day? Why is nobody at Turning Point USA demanding this guy be fired and never allowed near another principal again? I extend my platform to Chief Long. If he is seeing this or someone wants to let him know, i'd be glad to have him on my channel and set the record straight. I think's it's extremely cowardice and sleazy to to try to deflect accountability to/ and try to defame Chief Long when he gave you everything you wanted. RT and Tag Candace Owens The truth matters more than the narrative. Check Out the original post i made below on the day the interview dropped. also be sure to FOLLOW and go check out his latest bombshell livestream. Ill drop the link in the comments below.
2:26

🚨EXPOSED: Charlie Kirk's SECURITY LEAD Just Got CAUGHT RED-HANDED LYING On Sean Ryan's Show— Harpole Got EVERYTHING He Asked For… Then DEFAMED the Police Chief Anyway I agree with . Him and I were some of the only people to call this out the day the interview dropped. Almost nobody else did. Everyone just swallowed the “local PD failed us” narrative at face value. The failure was 100 % on the advance team that took “yes” from the chief, never followed up, never verified their own man was actually on that roof, and then pointed fingers everywhere else once Charlie was bleeding out. Protective details don’t get to outsource accountability. You own the mission or you own the coffin. How is this same guy and his team STILL protecting Erika Kirk to this day? Why is nobody at Turning Point USA demanding this guy be fired and never allowed near another principal again? I extend my platform to Chief Long. If he is seeing this or someone wants to let him know, i'd be glad to have him on my channel and set the record straight. I think's it's extremely cowardice and sleazy to to try to deflect accountability to/ and try to defame Chief Long when he gave you everything you wanted. RT and Tag Candace Owens The truth matters more than the narrative. Check Out the original post i made below on the day the interview dropped. also be sure to FOLLOW and go check out his latest bombshell livestream. Ill drop the link in the comments below.

Project Constitution

132,678 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🔴 Look, my entire theory is based on the following: 1. We know that Alex Bruesewitz (and his team) controls the Trump accounts. 2. Trump is being lied to. We already know he was misbriefed about Tucker Carlson (Laura Loomer corrected that), and I believe the same thing is happening again. That's why, in his Truth Social posts, Trump keeps arguing against straw men that completely miss the actual political debate. Trump seems to think that: - opposition to the deal is coming only from "Dumocrats", - that critical voices are merely claiming he lost the war (that's not what this is about), - that critics are upset about taxpayer money going to the regime (not true, only MTG said that, and her account is/was run by Bruesewitz), - that America doesn't have the stomach to see it through, even though he wanted to move forward (most critics are opposing the deal), etc. Trump's Truth Social posts read like those of someone who does not know who is opposing the deal or why they are opposing it. 3. Bruesewitz is an obvious liar, master manipulator, and professional political gaslighter. He and his friends (Anna Paulina Luna, Donald Trump Jr., and Jack Posobiec) invented an Israeli bot campaign without presenting any evidence and continue to push it relentlessly - simply to discredit anyone critical of Vance and the deal. Bruesewitz goes as far as using questionable polls, smearing accounts as Israeli bots, and may even have played a role in a large number of them being suspended all at once. 4. And then there's this: in an interview from last year, Bruesewitz explained that during the election campaign, it was his job to monitor reactions and comments under Trump's posts and brief the president on the political mood at the time. If Alex is still the one doing that, then my conclusion is simple: he is almost certainly misrepresenting the real opposition to Vance and this deal when briefing Trump. Someone, please, needs to get to the bottom of this.
1:29

🔴 Look, my entire theory is based on the following: 1. We know that Alex Bruesewitz (and his team) controls the Trump accounts. 2. Trump is being lied to. We already know he was misbriefed about Tucker Carlson (Laura Loomer corrected that), and I believe the same thing is happening again. That's why, in his Truth Social posts, Trump keeps arguing against straw men that completely miss the actual political debate. Trump seems to think that: - opposition to the deal is coming only from "Dumocrats", - that critical voices are merely claiming he lost the war (that's not what this is about), - that critics are upset about taxpayer money going to the regime (not true, only MTG said that, and her account is/was run by Bruesewitz), - that America doesn't have the stomach to see it through, even though he wanted to move forward (most critics are opposing the deal), etc. Trump's Truth Social posts read like those of someone who does not know who is opposing the deal or why they are opposing it. 3. Bruesewitz is an obvious liar, master manipulator, and professional political gaslighter. He and his friends (Anna Paulina Luna, Donald Trump Jr., and Jack Posobiec) invented an Israeli bot campaign without presenting any evidence and continue to push it relentlessly - simply to discredit anyone critical of Vance and the deal. Bruesewitz goes as far as using questionable polls, smearing accounts as Israeli bots, and may even have played a role in a large number of them being suspended all at once. 4. And then there's this: in an interview from last year, Bruesewitz explained that during the election campaign, it was his job to monitor reactions and comments under Trump's posts and brief the president on the political mood at the time. If Alex is still the one doing that, then my conclusion is simple: he is almost certainly misrepresenting the real opposition to Vance and this deal when briefing Trump. Someone, please, needs to get to the bottom of this.

diana bloom

75,740 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

So i was just watching Sam B and had similar thouggts, So, Colin is supposedly underage drinking and shot gunning beers all night, bouncing from Leonetti’s house to Fairview then comes home and goes into his mother’s bedroom to kiss her goodnight…And we are supposed to believe nobody had a problem with that?No concern about underage drinking? No questions about where he was? No concern about the timeline?No concern about who saw him, who picked him up, or what was actually happening inside that house?But somehow Chris Albert is upset with us for asking questions? How does Colin Allie Caitlin and Higgins not see the jeep or Higgins if the story is the jeep was at the end of the driveway. The same driveway that he was in before Brian and Nicole, and the same driveway Allie was in when Colin ran out of the house after bumping into Brian and Coco?????? That is the part I cannot get past. Because according to his own brother, “the system let them down at every turn.” Well, if the system let them down, then why is the anger aimed at citizens asking questions and not at the investigators who created the mess? If the investigation was clean, complete, and reliable, there would be nothing to question.But instead, we are told not to ask.Don’t ask about Colin. Don’t ask about the house.Don’t ask about the timeline. Don’t ask about the police work. Don’t ask why the adults’ stories make no sense. Sorry, but that is not how this works.The anger is misplaced. If this family truly believes the system failed them, then the questions should be directed at the people who ran the investigation not at the public still trying to figure out what actually happened. Here is a clip, and a link to her show.
2:29

So i was just watching Sam B and had similar thouggts, So, Colin is supposedly underage drinking and shot gunning beers all night, bouncing from Leonetti’s house to Fairview then comes home and goes into his mother’s bedroom to kiss her goodnight…And we are supposed to believe nobody had a problem with that?No concern about underage drinking? No questions about where he was? No concern about the timeline?No concern about who saw him, who picked him up, or what was actually happening inside that house?But somehow Chris Albert is upset with us for asking questions? How does Colin Allie Caitlin and Higgins not see the jeep or Higgins if the story is the jeep was at the end of the driveway. The same driveway that he was in before Brian and Nicole, and the same driveway Allie was in when Colin ran out of the house after bumping into Brian and Coco?????? That is the part I cannot get past. Because according to his own brother, “the system let them down at every turn.” Well, if the system let them down, then why is the anger aimed at citizens asking questions and not at the investigators who created the mess? If the investigation was clean, complete, and reliable, there would be nothing to question.But instead, we are told not to ask.Don’t ask about Colin. Don’t ask about the house.Don’t ask about the timeline. Don’t ask about the police work. Don’t ask why the adults’ stories make no sense. Sorry, but that is not how this works.The anger is misplaced. If this family truly believes the system failed them, then the questions should be directed at the people who ran the investigation not at the public still trying to figure out what actually happened. Here is a clip, and a link to her show.

Dixie Normus

26,394 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Charles Bronson and his agent, Paul Kohner disagreed on the message of "De@th Wish" (1974). His agent was against Bronson appearing in the movie. It was the only time that he disagreed with Bronson about a movie. Bronson said "Paul felt very strongly that it was a dangerous picture--that it might make people think it's right to take the law into their own hands. This is what the hero of the picture does when he wants a one-man vigilante squad to ki!! muggers, after three of them have murdered his wife and r@**d his daughter. I told Paul I thought the message was the same there that runs through a lot of my pictures: That violence is senseless because it only begets more violence." According to Michael Winner, Charles Bronson didn't like the ending and said that he won't do it. He feared how the public would perceive it as the ending suggested that he enjoyed ki!!ing people. Winner explained to him that was the core message of the movie - that his character enjoyed doing away with evil people. Bronson did the scene reluctantly and under protest because he always wanted to go home to dinner and have a rest. He had the option of arguing with Winner at the Central Station or do the scene to get home on time. He chose the latter. However, When the scene was a great success and critics and public loved it, Bronson went round telling everybody he wrote it. ("Winner Takes it All", Michael Winner, 2005 & IMDb)
0:41

Charles Bronson and his agent, Paul Kohner disagreed on the message of "De@th Wish" (1974). His agent was against Bronson appearing in the movie. It was the only time that he disagreed with Bronson about a movie. Bronson said "Paul felt very strongly that it was a dangerous picture--that it might make people think it's right to take the law into their own hands. This is what the hero of the picture does when he wants a one-man vigilante squad to ki!! muggers, after three of them have murdered his wife and r@**d his daughter. I told Paul I thought the message was the same there that runs through a lot of my pictures: That violence is senseless because it only begets more violence." According to Michael Winner, Charles Bronson didn't like the ending and said that he won't do it. He feared how the public would perceive it as the ending suggested that he enjoyed ki!!ing people. Winner explained to him that was the core message of the movie - that his character enjoyed doing away with evil people. Bronson did the scene reluctantly and under protest because he always wanted to go home to dinner and have a rest. He had the option of arguing with Winner at the Central Station or do the scene to get home on time. He chose the latter. However, When the scene was a great success and critics and public loved it, Bronson went round telling everybody he wrote it. ("Winner Takes it All", Michael Winner, 2005 & IMDb)

DepressedBergman

79,915 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

These are the facts. Yesterday, he explicitly stated that declaring a state of emergency doesn’t remove the governor. Today, he’s claiming that the president is in a precarious situation. Watch the entire video until the end. He said expressly no be can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor but Pres.Tinubu did, so why can’t he say Expressly President Tinubu was wrong. He stated boldly no body can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor he said if anyone tried it they will fail. So when Tinubu tried it 2 hours why didn’t he say Tinubu is operating an illegal law! He then said the president was pushed to declare state of emergency? Based on his argument yesterday why didn’t he say the president has no powers to declare state of emergency and suspend the governor He then pushes the argument to the National Assembly to decide which is a grand pivot mechanism. I have been in this business for 20 years so I know a pivot. The same 1961 law that he claimed didn’t exist ( he called it an antiquated law/ an illegal law)yesterday is now the same law he claims some lawyers informed him is still active. Before I intervened today, I watched the video multiple times and noticed that the speaker had pivoted. If he adheres to the constitution he quoted the previous day, why can’t he explicitly condemn President Tinubu in the same manner as he condemned Obasanjo in his previous intervention? It’s evident that he’s playing a strategic game. All the other things he said were to prolong the situation and ultimately support President Tinubu while citing the opinions of some lawyers, the same law he discarded the previous day. I’ve shared the entire video for accountability. We’re also aware of other events that transpired yesterday.
7:11

These are the facts. Yesterday, he explicitly stated that declaring a state of emergency doesn’t remove the governor. Today, he’s claiming that the president is in a precarious situation. Watch the entire video until the end. He said expressly no be can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor but Pres.Tinubu did, so why can’t he say Expressly President Tinubu was wrong. He stated boldly no body can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor he said if anyone tried it they will fail. So when Tinubu tried it 2 hours why didn’t he say Tinubu is operating an illegal law! He then said the president was pushed to declare state of emergency? Based on his argument yesterday why didn’t he say the president has no powers to declare state of emergency and suspend the governor He then pushes the argument to the National Assembly to decide which is a grand pivot mechanism. I have been in this business for 20 years so I know a pivot. The same 1961 law that he claimed didn’t exist ( he called it an antiquated law/ an illegal law)yesterday is now the same law he claims some lawyers informed him is still active. Before I intervened today, I watched the video multiple times and noticed that the speaker had pivoted. If he adheres to the constitution he quoted the previous day, why can’t he explicitly condemn President Tinubu in the same manner as he condemned Obasanjo in his previous intervention? It’s evident that he’s playing a strategic game. All the other things he said were to prolong the situation and ultimately support President Tinubu while citing the opinions of some lawyers, the same law he discarded the previous day. I’ve shared the entire video for accountability. We’re also aware of other events that transpired yesterday.

oseni rufai

41,125 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨MUST WATCH: Palm Beach Pete Just Took A Lie Detector Test And Failed Miserably Results That Prove He's Hiding Something.📈❌ Palm Beach Pete, in a desperate attempt to prove he is NOT Jeffrey Epstein, just took a lie detector test and FAILED IT MISERABLY. He was caught being deceptive on the most critical question of all: "Have you and Jeffrey Epstein ever been in the same room together?" Watch him squirm. First, he tries to downplay it: "I was at a party and he was at that party. I never spoke to him. I never met him." Then, when pressed, he admits: "So the answer is yes, the answer was yes. I was in a room and he was in the same room." And the polygrapher's devastating response? "No, I'm getting a little deception there." Pete's final, pathetic words? "What can I tell you?" I don't know the truth! You don't know the truth? A man goes on national television, desperate to clear his name from the biggest conspiracy of the century, and his final defense is "I don't know the truth"? That's not a denial. That's a confession. This is the most pathetic attempt at a cover-up we have ever seen. An innocent man doesn't fail a polygraph about his connection to the person he supposedly looks like. An innocent man doesn't fumble his own story. An innocent man doesn't end his defense by claiming he doesn't know the truth. He failed the test. He was caught in a lie. He has the same face, the same teeth, the same tattoo, the same locations, the same "partnerships," and now, he has a failed polygraph to his name. How much more proof does the world need? They faked Epstein's death, and this bumbling fool is the result. He failed the lie detector test. Share this everywhere. The truth is coming out, whether they like it or not. 🇺🇸⚓️ From: Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
0:32

🚨MUST WATCH: Palm Beach Pete Just Took A Lie Detector Test And Failed Miserably Results That Prove He's Hiding Something.📈❌ Palm Beach Pete, in a desperate attempt to prove he is NOT Jeffrey Epstein, just took a lie detector test and FAILED IT MISERABLY. He was caught being deceptive on the most critical question of all: "Have you and Jeffrey Epstein ever been in the same room together?" Watch him squirm. First, he tries to downplay it: "I was at a party and he was at that party. I never spoke to him. I never met him." Then, when pressed, he admits: "So the answer is yes, the answer was yes. I was in a room and he was in the same room." And the polygrapher's devastating response? "No, I'm getting a little deception there." Pete's final, pathetic words? "What can I tell you?" I don't know the truth! You don't know the truth? A man goes on national television, desperate to clear his name from the biggest conspiracy of the century, and his final defense is "I don't know the truth"? That's not a denial. That's a confession. This is the most pathetic attempt at a cover-up we have ever seen. An innocent man doesn't fail a polygraph about his connection to the person he supposedly looks like. An innocent man doesn't fumble his own story. An innocent man doesn't end his defense by claiming he doesn't know the truth. He failed the test. He was caught in a lie. He has the same face, the same teeth, the same tattoo, the same locations, the same "partnerships," and now, he has a failed polygraph to his name. How much more proof does the world need? They faked Epstein's death, and this bumbling fool is the result. He failed the lie detector test. Share this everywhere. The truth is coming out, whether they like it or not. 🇺🇸⚓️ From: Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Project Constitution

582,793 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce