Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

New Candace Owens Grift: Physics-Defying Exploding Microphone Theory For Idiots First it was a shot from below the table (secret tunnel). Then she said it came from behind. Later she confirmed: "And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there. And I'm telling you...

paramounttactcl's profile picture

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

40,227 subscribers

21,004 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

For all those who doubt me, here is a video demonstration of this: This is a 0.223 caliber 5.56 NATO bullet shot from an AR-15-style rifle with a muzzle energy of 1300 ft-lb (1763 J). The substance it is being shot into is a ballistics gel specifically engineered to replicate human tissue. As you can see in the video when the bullet stops, the kinetic energy is transferred to the surrounding area, creating that puff effect you see from Charlie’s shirt. There was no exploding microphone. Charlie died from a bullet to his neck. Stop listening to people like Candy Owens and Ian Carroll who have no idea what they’re talking about.
0:19

For all those who doubt me, here is a video demonstration of this: This is a 0.223 caliber 5.56 NATO bullet shot from an AR-15-style rifle with a muzzle energy of 1300 ft-lb (1763 J). The substance it is being shot into is a ballistics gel specifically engineered to replicate human tissue. As you can see in the video when the bullet stops, the kinetic energy is transferred to the surrounding area, creating that puff effect you see from Charlie’s shirt. There was no exploding microphone. Charlie died from a bullet to his neck. Stop listening to people like Candy Owens and Ian Carroll who have no idea what they’re talking about.

Jacktron

66,137 views • 1 month ago

Exploding Mic Debunked... Again, By Basic Physics Newton’s 3rd Law is non negotiable: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. If the microphone allegedly exploded with enough force to kill a man, the mic itself should have been violently blasted away from the direction of the supposed blast. Instead, it travels in the same direction as the alleged explosion. That’s not how physics works. And that’s before we even get to the rest of the fantasy: • No flash • No smoke • No burn marks on skin or clothing • A thin white t-shirt somehow contains a lethal blast wave with zero tearing or residue • The weak Rode magnetic mount stays perfectly attached Every single one of these details is physically impossible for a real explosive event. This is high-school physics and observable reality. The "Exploding Mic" is an IQ test.
0:18

Exploding Mic Debunked... Again, By Basic Physics Newton’s 3rd Law is non negotiable: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. If the microphone allegedly exploded with enough force to kill a man, the mic itself should have been violently blasted away from the direction of the supposed blast. Instead, it travels in the same direction as the alleged explosion. That’s not how physics works. And that’s before we even get to the rest of the fantasy: • No flash • No smoke • No burn marks on skin or clothing • A thin white t-shirt somehow contains a lethal blast wave with zero tearing or residue • The weak Rode magnetic mount stays perfectly attached Every single one of these details is physically impossible for a real explosive event. This is high-school physics and observable reality. The "Exploding Mic" is an IQ test.

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

212,159 views • 2 months ago

You obviously have a low iq and don’t understand how guns work. This video proves his body reaction was from a impact from the front 100%. You have a iq under 70 if you think getting shot in the back would push you backwards. You obviously do t understand physics and the kinetic energy of a bullet.
0:12

You obviously have a low iq and don’t understand how guns work. This video proves his body reaction was from a impact from the front 100%. You have a iq under 70 if you think getting shot in the back would push you backwards. You obviously do t understand physics and the kinetic energy of a bullet.

Prometheus

16,287 views • 10 months ago

There it is. Megyn Kelly says she knows Israel and Jewish friends didn’t have anything to do with the murder of Charlie Kirk, but she did not call Candace Owens out for asking those questions, even though she knew it was not relevant at all and libeled an ally country unfairly, because she “favored her asking them.” Did you get that Turning Point USA? She knew it was a lie - but she WANTED TO HEAR THE LIE PUSHED OUT. She wasn’t just being nice to a crazy friend - she was complicit in knowingly covering for and spreading the libel. Is this a Christian value? Is this an American value?
0:13

There it is. Megyn Kelly says she knows Israel and Jewish friends didn’t have anything to do with the murder of Charlie Kirk, but she did not call Candace Owens out for asking those questions, even though she knew it was not relevant at all and libeled an ally country unfairly, because she “favored her asking them.” Did you get that Turning Point USA? She knew it was a lie - but she WANTED TO HEAR THE LIE PUSHED OUT. She wasn’t just being nice to a crazy friend - she was complicit in knowingly covering for and spreading the libel. Is this a Christian value? Is this an American value?

Stephanie

45,429 views • 8 months ago

.Candace Owens completely forgot that she did an entire episode accusing Charlie of lying to her. Now she’s telling people not to believe Andrew Kolvet because she claims he called Charlie a liar. By the way, Andrew never said Charlie was a liar. The reality is that Charlie always had to do unusual things when it came to his “friendship” with Candace. Cc:Blake Neff Erika Kirk Tyler Bowyer Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
0:17

.Candace Owens completely forgot that she did an entire episode accusing Charlie of lying to her. Now she’s telling people not to believe Andrew Kolvet because she claims he called Charlie a liar. By the way, Andrew never said Charlie was a liar. The reality is that Charlie always had to do unusual things when it came to his “friendship” with Candace. Cc:Blake Neff Erika Kirk Tyler Bowyer Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

Jinet Gharibian

34,073 views • 1 month ago

A Russian boy said it felt strange at first to shoot, but his father told him to imagine he was killing Ukrainians. That hatred he’s been exposed to helped. Now the boy wants to follow in his father’s footsteps and kill innocents. Russia is raising a generation of killers, and it is not just about fathers coming back from the front. These lessons are mandatory in schools and later broadcast on state TV.
0:18

A Russian boy said it felt strange at first to shoot, but his father told him to imagine he was killing Ukrainians. That hatred he’s been exposed to helped. Now the boy wants to follow in his father’s footsteps and kill innocents. Russia is raising a generation of killers, and it is not just about fathers coming back from the front. These lessons are mandatory in schools and later broadcast on state TV.

Victoria

19,375 views • 11 months ago

This man's wife and son was going to pick up their daughter from school. When she started putting the baby in the car and noticed it was a man sitting in the passenger seat she called him downstairs and the husband said “Bruh get out my car please” he laughed and said it was his car with all of they papers from the glove compartment in his pocket. He proceeded to beat the brakes off of this man. The End.
0:16

This man's wife and son was going to pick up their daughter from school. When she started putting the baby in the car and noticed it was a man sitting in the passenger seat she called him downstairs and the husband said “Bruh get out my car please” he laughed and said it was his car with all of they papers from the glove compartment in his pocket. He proceeded to beat the brakes off of this man. The End.

!Nspirenaire〽️

3,068,563 views • 9 months ago

Candace Owens continues to prove how gullible her low IQ fans are. Just a couple of weeks ago the conspiracy was that nobody called 911 after Charlie was shot. Her minions went crazy over it for a few days. Now that conspiracy is stale. So the new conspiracy is that they did call 911 but now somehow thats a bad thing. When just a couple of weeks ago the talking points were that it was bad that no one called 911. This is just another example of how Candace constantly lies and contradicts herself from week to week. She cries and accuses people of being paid to attack her when they debunk her fake conspiracies meanwhile she’s constantly debunking her own conspiracies with new ones.
0:16

Candace Owens continues to prove how gullible her low IQ fans are. Just a couple of weeks ago the conspiracy was that nobody called 911 after Charlie was shot. Her minions went crazy over it for a few days. Now that conspiracy is stale. So the new conspiracy is that they did call 911 but now somehow thats a bad thing. When just a couple of weeks ago the talking points were that it was bad that no one called 911. This is just another example of how Candace constantly lies and contradicts herself from week to week. She cries and accuses people of being paid to attack her when they debunk her fake conspiracies meanwhile she’s constantly debunking her own conspiracies with new ones.

Cinema Shogun

42,220 views • 1 month ago

Exactly. While this is true, it’s also irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Ross was at fault, period. Here’s why: First off, it’s against DHS policy & training for an officer to approach a vehicle from the front in this situation, and this “officer-induced jeopardy” negates the officers use of force claim and puts him at fault, period. There’s no debate on this as video evidence from multiple sources clearly show Ross stopping in front of her vehicle, and then taking the time to shift his phone from his right hand to his left so he can draw his weapon…BEFORE she even started moving. THIS is simply reality, and the conversation should end here. Second, it’s against DHS Use of Deadly Force policy (which is codified law) to fire at a moving vehicle that doesn’t pose imminent danger to officers, and even if they ARE in danger, it mandates deescalation before using deadly force, which EXPRESSLY states simply “moving out of the way” of a vehicle as a correct course of action before using deadly force (see attached doc below). Third, there is already well-established legal precedent governing these EXACT types of situations, and this officer would likely be found guilty by any jury in the U.S. For example: Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.” Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.” Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.” Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.” Fifth, the videos/pics below CLEARLY show the officer was NOT in immediate danger, and the woman was moving away from him when he fired his FIRST shot when he was already clear to the left of the vehicle, and he fired the second & third shots point-blank into her face from the SIDE of the vehicle as she passed. That alone is enough to send him to prison, even if his first shot was somehow inexplicably deemed to be justified.
0:28

Exactly. While this is true, it’s also irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Ross was at fault, period. Here’s why: First off, it’s against DHS policy & training for an officer to approach a vehicle from the front in this situation, and this “officer-induced jeopardy” negates the officers use of force claim and puts him at fault, period. There’s no debate on this as video evidence from multiple sources clearly show Ross stopping in front of her vehicle, and then taking the time to shift his phone from his right hand to his left so he can draw his weapon…BEFORE she even started moving. THIS is simply reality, and the conversation should end here. Second, it’s against DHS Use of Deadly Force policy (which is codified law) to fire at a moving vehicle that doesn’t pose imminent danger to officers, and even if they ARE in danger, it mandates deescalation before using deadly force, which EXPRESSLY states simply “moving out of the way” of a vehicle as a correct course of action before using deadly force (see attached doc below). Third, there is already well-established legal precedent governing these EXACT types of situations, and this officer would likely be found guilty by any jury in the U.S. For example: Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.” Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.” Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.” Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.” Fifth, the videos/pics below CLEARLY show the officer was NOT in immediate danger, and the woman was moving away from him when he fired his FIRST shot when he was already clear to the left of the vehicle, and he fired the second & third shots point-blank into her face from the SIDE of the vehicle as she passed. That alone is enough to send him to prison, even if his first shot was somehow inexplicably deemed to be justified.

Notorious PJB

18,329 views • 7 months ago

I always find it interesting that people say "explosion" on Charlie when the further you get away from Charlie, the louder that gunshot sound is. To me, that gunshot sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were near it and it sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were a few hundred yards away. I understand how phone microphones work and compress, but NOT ONE PODSLOPPER has debunked the acoustic proof that this was a gunshot, NOT ONE. Until you debunk that, YOU HAVE NOTHING. In this comparison, I turned the VOLUME UP on the closer microphone, you can tell I did it, it is not scientific, but believe your eyes and ears. NO EXPLOSION ON CHARLIE. Candace Owens Baron Coleman
0:18

I always find it interesting that people say "explosion" on Charlie when the further you get away from Charlie, the louder that gunshot sound is. To me, that gunshot sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were near it and it sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were a few hundred yards away. I understand how phone microphones work and compress, but NOT ONE PODSLOPPER has debunked the acoustic proof that this was a gunshot, NOT ONE. Until you debunk that, YOU HAVE NOTHING. In this comparison, I turned the VOLUME UP on the closer microphone, you can tell I did it, it is not scientific, but believe your eyes and ears. NO EXPLOSION ON CHARLIE. Candace Owens Baron Coleman

MR. Xclusive

10,709 views • 28 days ago

Trump Assassination Attempt - Help Me Out with this one Plz A Review of Shots Fired — How Many were Hit on the First Shot? 🔴 VIDEO #1 • Shows a man in a white shirt appearing to take have taken a shot to the abdominal area and falls down. —— this occurs during the first shot ( 🔴 VIDEO #2 • Shows two people who appears to have been hit near the low and high abdominal area. —— the FIRST shot appears to have grazed or come extremely close to the man in the dark shirt as he immediately looks down and falls. Not 100% sure he was hit, but other videos confirm the bleacher next to him was hit. —— the SECOND shot definitely hits the man in the American flag shirt as he grabs his abdomen and falls. ( 🔴 VIDEO #3 • This is a wide-angled video showing their locations. Along with Competatore’s location. —— Comperatore is said to be hit in the second volley of shots, after the first three. —— for the sake of clarity, here is the full unedited wide-angled video. ( 🔴 VIDEO #4 • Video of Comperatore reportedly on the ground with what appears to be his family going hysterical. People point to their head, confirming shot. Reportedly hit in the volley of shots after the first 3. 🔴 VIDEO #5 • This model shows an accurate depiction of the line of sight between the shooter, Trump, and stands. ( The only thing that doesn’t make sense to me is the first shot… —— This model does not include the man in the white shirt from Video #1 and appears misaligned between the shooter, Trump, and video #2 victim. Talk about a magic bullet… Am I missing something?
0:08

Trump Assassination Attempt - Help Me Out with this one Plz A Review of Shots Fired — How Many were Hit on the First Shot? 🔴 VIDEO #1 • Shows a man in a white shirt appearing to take have taken a shot to the abdominal area and falls down. —— this occurs during the first shot ( 🔴 VIDEO #2 • Shows two people who appears to have been hit near the low and high abdominal area. —— the FIRST shot appears to have grazed or come extremely close to the man in the dark shirt as he immediately looks down and falls. Not 100% sure he was hit, but other videos confirm the bleacher next to him was hit. —— the SECOND shot definitely hits the man in the American flag shirt as he grabs his abdomen and falls. ( 🔴 VIDEO #3 • This is a wide-angled video showing their locations. Along with Competatore’s location. —— Comperatore is said to be hit in the second volley of shots, after the first three. —— for the sake of clarity, here is the full unedited wide-angled video. ( 🔴 VIDEO #4 • Video of Comperatore reportedly on the ground with what appears to be his family going hysterical. People point to their head, confirming shot. Reportedly hit in the volley of shots after the first 3. 🔴 VIDEO #5 • This model shows an accurate depiction of the line of sight between the shooter, Trump, and stands. ( The only thing that doesn’t make sense to me is the first shot… —— This model does not include the man in the white shirt from Video #1 and appears misaligned between the shooter, Trump, and video #2 victim. Talk about a magic bullet… Am I missing something?

MJTruthUltra

59,812 views • 2 years ago

🇺🇸 CANDACE OWENS: PRESSURE TO STOP CHARLIE KIRK REPORTING CAME AFTER MEDIA INTERVENED Candace said pushback against her reporting on Charlie Kirk intensified only after outside media figures entered the conversation. She claimed that early on, Erika Kirk did not ask her to stop because she was learning from the material being discussed publicly. Candace argued the situation shifted once journalists began framing the coverage as a controversy rather than an investigation. She pointed to Bari Weiss as an example, saying the focus moved toward creating a media moment instead of resolving unanswered questions: “And it’s interesting to hear Erica say the reason she didn’t ask me to stop in the beginning was because she was actually learning things from the show. I think she felt Barry Weiss was trying to create a moment. Obviously it’s who Barry Weiss is. It’s the Zionist lobby.” Source: Candace Owens
0:19

🇺🇸 CANDACE OWENS: PRESSURE TO STOP CHARLIE KIRK REPORTING CAME AFTER MEDIA INTERVENED Candace said pushback against her reporting on Charlie Kirk intensified only after outside media figures entered the conversation. She claimed that early on, Erika Kirk did not ask her to stop because she was learning from the material being discussed publicly. Candace argued the situation shifted once journalists began framing the coverage as a controversy rather than an investigation. She pointed to Bari Weiss as an example, saying the focus moved toward creating a media moment instead of resolving unanswered questions: “And it’s interesting to hear Erica say the reason she didn’t ask me to stop in the beginning was because she was actually learning things from the show. I think she felt Barry Weiss was trying to create a moment. Obviously it’s who Barry Weiss is. It’s the Zionist lobby.” Source: Candace Owens

Mario Nawfal

46,032 views • 8 months ago

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı
0:12

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 views • 5 months ago

Erika Kirk says Candace Owens is lying — Charlie did not text anyone the day before he was murdered saying, “They’re going to Kill me.” She says she knows because she has his phone. 🔻 Context: Frank Turek said a few times, in the months leading up to Charlie’s murder, he told Charlie he hopes he increased his security — Charlie responded, “I have. They want me dead.” Frank said he didn’t know who he meant by “They”. Frank assumed he just meant leftists. These text messages of course aren’t from the day before… but provide context that maybe Charlie was in that state of mind due to all the pressure he was under. Candace claims a few individuals received text messages from Charlie the night before claiming “they’re going to kill me”, allegedly that he sent during a call he had with certain people. She says they’ve asked her not to share those messages. Candace encouraged them to come forward. As of right now, I’m inclined to believe Erika unless something gets released. Erika Frank Clip 1 Frank Clip 2
0:15

Erika Kirk says Candace Owens is lying — Charlie did not text anyone the day before he was murdered saying, “They’re going to Kill me.” She says she knows because she has his phone. 🔻 Context: Frank Turek said a few times, in the months leading up to Charlie’s murder, he told Charlie he hopes he increased his security — Charlie responded, “I have. They want me dead.” Frank said he didn’t know who he meant by “They”. Frank assumed he just meant leftists. These text messages of course aren’t from the day before… but provide context that maybe Charlie was in that state of mind due to all the pressure he was under. Candace claims a few individuals received text messages from Charlie the night before claiming “they’re going to kill me”, allegedly that he sent during a call he had with certain people. She says they’ve asked her not to share those messages. Candace encouraged them to come forward. As of right now, I’m inclined to believe Erika unless something gets released. Erika Frank Clip 1 Frank Clip 2

MJTruthUltra

973,982 views • 8 months ago

🚨AMAZING: Candace Owens on JOURNEY To Catholicism — "To Be A STUDENT Of History Is To Become CATHOLIC"🕊️⛪ Tonight in Washington, D.C., Candace Owens shared the deeply personal story of her conversion at the Catholics for Catholics event. What started as questioning her husband’s faith turned into a profound realization that history, logic, and tradition all led to the same door. The Turning Point: This old clip of Candace is extremely powerful where she gives her account of her conversion to catholicism. Early in her marriage, Candace’s husband challenged her to look at the roots of the faith. His words stayed with her: "To become a student of history means to become a Catholic." Candace reveals how she moved past the "nays" and the questions to fall in love with the traditions of the Church, particularly developing a deep devotion to Mother Mary. For Candace, this isn't just about religion—it’s about finding the grounded, historical truth in a world that feels increasingly chaotic and untethered. "I am overdosing on morality," she joked earlier, but tonight the tone was one of reverence and peace. In a city like D.C., where everything is political, Candace reminded the audience that some things are eternal. This is a powerful and personal moment for Candace. Her journey from being a vocal critic to a devout convert is one of the most talked-about spiritual shifts in the movement, and her speech tonight in D.C. at the Catholic Prayer for America Gala is already making waves. Candace Owens Catholics for Catholics 🇺🇲
0:19

🚨AMAZING: Candace Owens on JOURNEY To Catholicism — "To Be A STUDENT Of History Is To Become CATHOLIC"🕊️⛪ Tonight in Washington, D.C., Candace Owens shared the deeply personal story of her conversion at the Catholics for Catholics event. What started as questioning her husband’s faith turned into a profound realization that history, logic, and tradition all led to the same door. The Turning Point: This old clip of Candace is extremely powerful where she gives her account of her conversion to catholicism. Early in her marriage, Candace’s husband challenged her to look at the roots of the faith. His words stayed with her: "To become a student of history means to become a Catholic." Candace reveals how she moved past the "nays" and the questions to fall in love with the traditions of the Church, particularly developing a deep devotion to Mother Mary. For Candace, this isn't just about religion—it’s about finding the grounded, historical truth in a world that feels increasingly chaotic and untethered. "I am overdosing on morality," she joked earlier, but tonight the tone was one of reverence and peace. In a city like D.C., where everything is political, Candace reminded the audience that some things are eternal. This is a powerful and personal moment for Candace. Her journey from being a vocal critic to a devout convert is one of the most talked-about spiritual shifts in the movement, and her speech tonight in D.C. at the Catholic Prayer for America Gala is already making waves. Candace Owens Catholics for Catholics 🇺🇲

Project Constitution

227,761 views • 5 months ago

🚨BOMBSHELL: Drone CAUGHT ON VIDEO Above Charlie Kirk at the MOMENT Of The SHOT –Mystery DRONE HOVERS Exactly Where the Shot Originated According To All The EVIDENCE 🪰🎯 Just a Reminder: We Believe Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated by a Sniper Drone from His Right Side – And the Video Evidence Speaks for Itself. Based on multiple lines of evidence, including sound analysis using echolocation to trace the origin, less credible but notable crack-boom analysis, a projectile visibly captured on camera, and the pressure wave (the visible pressure disturbance created as the bullet slows from supersonic down to subsonic) that we originally mistook for a muzzle flash reflection in one of the windows of the BA building, but closer examination reveals it as the aerodynamic signature of a high-velocity round. We conclude the shot came from a drone positioned over Kirk's right side. In this video from the event shown below, we can see an unidentified drone hovering precisely on Kirk's right flank—the exact location our analysis indicates as the source. This aligns with advanced military capabilities, such as those detailed in declassified UAP documents from the US Military as well as the capabilities of Israel's number one drone manufacturer "Elbit System" which not-so coincidentally has a facility right there in Utah. If this was a drone strike, who authorized it, and why the cover-up? Tag Candace Owens and Retweet if you're demanding a full investigation, and drop a 🔎 in the comments if you agree the evidence points to foul play.
0:14

🚨BOMBSHELL: Drone CAUGHT ON VIDEO Above Charlie Kirk at the MOMENT Of The SHOT –Mystery DRONE HOVERS Exactly Where the Shot Originated According To All The EVIDENCE 🪰🎯 Just a Reminder: We Believe Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated by a Sniper Drone from His Right Side – And the Video Evidence Speaks for Itself. Based on multiple lines of evidence, including sound analysis using echolocation to trace the origin, less credible but notable crack-boom analysis, a projectile visibly captured on camera, and the pressure wave (the visible pressure disturbance created as the bullet slows from supersonic down to subsonic) that we originally mistook for a muzzle flash reflection in one of the windows of the BA building, but closer examination reveals it as the aerodynamic signature of a high-velocity round. We conclude the shot came from a drone positioned over Kirk's right side. In this video from the event shown below, we can see an unidentified drone hovering precisely on Kirk's right flank—the exact location our analysis indicates as the source. This aligns with advanced military capabilities, such as those detailed in declassified UAP documents from the US Military as well as the capabilities of Israel's number one drone manufacturer "Elbit System" which not-so coincidentally has a facility right there in Utah. If this was a drone strike, who authorized it, and why the cover-up? Tag Candace Owens and Retweet if you're demanding a full investigation, and drop a 🔎 in the comments if you agree the evidence points to foul play.

Project Constitution

485,225 views • 8 months ago

🇺🇦🚨 Confirmed from Ukraine: Zelenskyy's police are now wearing CIVILIAN clothing to capture men in the streets. This father was kidnapped in front of his wife and son. Are you paying attention, Western man? This is the plan for ALL of us.
0:10

🇺🇦🚨 Confirmed from Ukraine: Zelenskyy's police are now wearing CIVILIAN clothing to capture men in the streets. This father was kidnapped in front of his wife and son. Are you paying attention, Western man? This is the plan for ALL of us.

₿en Wehrman

85,148 views • 3 months ago

I didn’t think Candace Owens could get anymore pathetic, but I was wrong. Now, she states that she was told “it was supposed to be her”. She is trying her best to take any and everything away from Charlie by any means necessary and this time it’s the ‘look at me, I’m the real victim’ card. What a disgusting human being.
0:16

I didn’t think Candace Owens could get anymore pathetic, but I was wrong. Now, she states that she was told “it was supposed to be her”. She is trying her best to take any and everything away from Charlie by any means necessary and this time it’s the ‘look at me, I’m the real victim’ card. What a disgusting human being.

Tiffany Savage 🇺🇸

76,450 views • 1 month ago