Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

NEW: Columnist QUITS the Washington Post, storms off broadcast in unforgettable moment. “This is the most unfair election ad I have ever been a part of... I'm done,” Hugh Hewitt announced, before ripping off his earpiece and leaving. This moment came after the host told Hewitt, “You come here...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,973,128 subscribers

2,652,651 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Slade Joseph's profile picture
Slade Joseph1 year ago

Mainstream Media is crumbling right before our eyes

The Vigilant Fox 🦊's profile picture
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 year ago

What a disaster. Capehart looked completely uncomfortable all by himself.

Rolf Stocks&Options's profile picture
Rolf Stocks&Options1 year ago

Well done. That is what I call free man

The Vigilant Fox 🦊's profile picture
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 year ago

I have a feeling @hughhewitt will become more popular than ever after this. @TuckerCarlson should interview him.

Marc 🇺🇸's profile picture
Marc 🇺🇸1 year ago

These ‘journalists’ are acting like it’s a conspiracy. Bucks County was found to have broken election laws, leading to a court-ordered extension of early voting. If Trump's issues with the process were unfounded, why did the court extend early voting for 3 days?

Siddharth P's profile picture
Siddharth P1 year ago

Hugh Hewitt’s exit from the Washington Post broadcast shines a glaring light on media bias. When facts are inconvenient, mainstream media would rather silence or discredit voices than allow open debate. This incident reflects the lengths some outlets will go to control the narrative, pushing propaganda over truth. It’s no wonder trust in media is at an all-time low—Americans are tired of one-sided coverage and deserve unfiltered facts, not orchestrated echo chambers.

Johnny St.Pete's profile picture
Johnny St.Pete1 year ago

Capehart has been a political mockingbird pawn for years, going back to him being on Morning Joe. Just another POS taking a check to repeat the GOVT narrative. Bravo to Hugh for this moment. This is how things change for the better.

stephen renninger's profile picture
stephen renninger1 year ago

Hewitt has set an example of what journalism should look like. Bravo my man. What a perfect example to set for young people coming up in the business. Your are a man above the rest in that atmosphere and i think you should get rewarded.

robcox's profile picture
robcox1 year ago

Hugh Hewitt's response highlights how many rational and reasonable people have left the news media in the last ten years, leaving only pathological liars and radical libs.

𝐆𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐬's profile picture
𝐆𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐬1 year ago

Hugh Hewitt just showed what happens when the truth gets censored! It’s about time someone called out the media’s bias. Go, Hugh! ❤️

Related Videos

“Oh, I don’t know if I can put it into words, but it just is the most special feeling. I'm— you know, I've dreamed of this moment. So the fact that it's here and I'm a part of it is insane. I'm just so lucky and so proud to be representing the country.” - Masali on what this moment (the premiere in Cape Town) means to her 💜
1:07

“Oh, I don’t know if I can put it into words, but it just is the most special feeling. I'm— you know, I've dreamed of this moment. So the fact that it's here and I'm a part of it is insane. I'm just so lucky and so proud to be representing the country.” - Masali on what this moment (the premiere in Cape Town) means to her 💜

masali baduza archive 🍒

10,400 views • 7 months ago

General Sibaya couldn’t even say it! After he was pressed he had to write it done. When I told you that they go entertain themselves in many various places “The Hockey Club” you guys said it doesn’t exist. He just told you of “The After 9 Club and you just choose to ignore that part. 🤷🏾‍♀️ What is more alarming is the details in between that are not said. The truth is those that know it know it. It’s so unfortunate that there is so much abuse that happens in those spaces, hence his embarrassment. He is ashamed that he knows such. It’s just so disgusting 🤢.
1:45

General Sibaya couldn’t even say it! After he was pressed he had to write it done. When I told you that they go entertain themselves in many various places “The Hockey Club” you guys said it doesn’t exist. He just told you of “The After 9 Club and you just choose to ignore that part. 🤷🏾‍♀️ What is more alarming is the details in between that are not said. The truth is those that know it know it. It’s so unfortunate that there is so much abuse that happens in those spaces, hence his embarrassment. He is ashamed that he knows such. It’s just so disgusting 🤢.

Jackie Phamotse

95,041 views • 6 months ago

Lavar Ball on the Charlotte Hornets having LaMelo come off the bench: “This is how you can tell how raggedy it is... you ask him to come off the bench and he’s your young franchise player. Has that ever been done before? (via House of Highlights)
1:50

Lavar Ball on the Charlotte Hornets having LaMelo come off the bench: “This is how you can tell how raggedy it is... you ask him to come off the bench and he’s your young franchise player. Has that ever been done before? (via House of Highlights)

Kyle Ingram

135,332 views • 1 month ago

RNC Better Erect A War Room Strategy to Defeat DSA! "I think that they've been deluding themselves a little bit about the nature of this threat for a while and it's unfortunate!" ~ Ben Domenech On today's segment of the Hugh Hewitt radio show, Hewitt pressed guest Ben Domenech on whether the Republican National Committee is equipped to hold New York City Mayor Eric Adams accountable for his campaign pledges, likening the effort to a strategic "war room" operation. Hewitt expressed hope that the RNC's digital division had already mobilized to track Adams' record, including unfulfilled promises on grocery stores, free buses, and rent control. "Now, I'm hoping out loud and in print that the Republican National Committee digital division has already set up a war room to follow the Mayor Donnie record, his promises, his delivery, where are the grocery stores, where are the free buses, where's the rent control?" Hewitt said. Hewitt urged the party to recognize Mamdani as a key target, invoking Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals to emphasize the need for ridicule and personalization. "Do you think they know he's their face that they've got to focus on and follow the Alinsky, the rules for radicals, for Alinsky, objectify and de, you know, ridicule? It's going to be ridiculous what he does. You think the RNC is ready for that?" Domenech responded skeptically, arguing that "the RNC has underestimated the broader ideological threat posed by Adams and the progressive left. "I don't think they are," Domenech replied. "I think that they've been deluding themselves a little bit about the nature of this threat for a while and it's unfortunate because I think it's been pretty clear." Domenech pivoted to what he described as a "horseshoe theory" dynamic, where extremes on both political sides converge in unexpected ways, though time constraints limited deeper exploration in the segment. "And look, you know, we haven't talked about it and there's too little time left to talk about it in this segment, but the simple fact is this is a horseshoe theory situation if I've ever seen one," Domenech noted.
1:53

RNC Better Erect A War Room Strategy to Defeat DSA! "I think that they've been deluding themselves a little bit about the nature of this threat for a while and it's unfortunate!" ~ Ben Domenech On today's segment of the Hugh Hewitt radio show, Hewitt pressed guest Ben Domenech on whether the Republican National Committee is equipped to hold New York City Mayor Eric Adams accountable for his campaign pledges, likening the effort to a strategic "war room" operation. Hewitt expressed hope that the RNC's digital division had already mobilized to track Adams' record, including unfulfilled promises on grocery stores, free buses, and rent control. "Now, I'm hoping out loud and in print that the Republican National Committee digital division has already set up a war room to follow the Mayor Donnie record, his promises, his delivery, where are the grocery stores, where are the free buses, where's the rent control?" Hewitt said. Hewitt urged the party to recognize Mamdani as a key target, invoking Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals to emphasize the need for ridicule and personalization. "Do you think they know he's their face that they've got to focus on and follow the Alinsky, the rules for radicals, for Alinsky, objectify and de, you know, ridicule? It's going to be ridiculous what he does. You think the RNC is ready for that?" Domenech responded skeptically, arguing that "the RNC has underestimated the broader ideological threat posed by Adams and the progressive left. "I don't think they are," Domenech replied. "I think that they've been deluding themselves a little bit about the nature of this threat for a while and it's unfortunate because I think it's been pretty clear." Domenech pivoted to what he described as a "horseshoe theory" dynamic, where extremes on both political sides converge in unexpected ways, though time constraints limited deeper exploration in the segment. "And look, you know, we haven't talked about it and there's too little time left to talk about it in this segment, but the simple fact is this is a horseshoe theory situation if I've ever seen one," Domenech noted.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

23,291 views • 9 months ago

“This is what you want it to look like… These are things that you can build on… After the pick six, he did come back… it did look better in the passing game. So you saw the resilience, the compartmentalizing of that one mistake.” Greg Jennings reacts to Fernando Mendoza:
5:05

“This is what you want it to look like… These are things that you can build on… After the pick six, he did come back… it did look better in the passing game. So you saw the resilience, the compartmentalizing of that one mistake.” Greg Jennings reacts to Fernando Mendoza:

First Things First

14,624 views • 4 days ago

Something leave it alone, means leave it alone. 🤣 What would possess someone to mess with something when you are told how heavy it is and you know you don't have the strength of the person that is telling you how heavy it is? I'd be kind of p*ssed if I came home to this. 😁
1:11

Something leave it alone, means leave it alone. 🤣 What would possess someone to mess with something when you are told how heavy it is and you know you don't have the strength of the person that is telling you how heavy it is? I'd be kind of p*ssed if I came home to this. 😁

Chuckling Charlie

61,911 views • 5 months ago

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."
3:47

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

Joe Murgia

763,115 views • 1 year ago

AJ Brown on his comments: “After the game I said all the right answers and y'all still made a story. In that moment when I'm just talking and having fun with my friend, I'm not apologizing for that. 'Cause if you have eyes, you can see that. It's not that I was throwing anyone under the bus. I'm literally trying to laugh through this shit. This shit is tough. I'm trying to make fun of the situation to get through it. It is what it is."
0:53

AJ Brown on his comments: “After the game I said all the right answers and y'all still made a story. In that moment when I'm just talking and having fun with my friend, I'm not apologizing for that. 'Cause if you have eyes, you can see that. It's not that I was throwing anyone under the bus. I'm literally trying to laugh through this shit. This shit is tough. I'm trying to make fun of the situation to get through it. It is what it is."

Eagles Nation

387,772 views • 9 months ago

Fox’s Hugh Hewitt: “Gov. Pritzker is running. He’s not running very well.” Bret Baier: “100 per cent he’s running.” Hewitt: “Nothing made sense. You present him with statements and he contradicts himself. He’s playing the far left wing of his party though he denied it to you. Good hard-hitting questions, he’s not very good at this. He can only win in Illinois with a billionaire’s money.”
0:31

Fox’s Hugh Hewitt: “Gov. Pritzker is running. He’s not running very well.” Bret Baier: “100 per cent he’s running.” Hewitt: “Nothing made sense. You present him with statements and he contradicts himself. He’s playing the far left wing of his party though he denied it to you. Good hard-hitting questions, he’s not very good at this. He can only win in Illinois with a billionaire’s money.”

TV News Now

232,127 views • 10 months ago

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”
0:48

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”

Overton

1,057,581 views • 9 months ago

EVERYONE needs to be aware how SIGNIFICANT the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is This election decides who controls The House of Representatives and Voter ID Elon Musk “The single biggest challenge, I think is actually just making people aware that there is this very important election. There's both the very important election for Judge Schimel as well as the deciding on, on adding voter ID to the Wisconsin Constitution institution, which is very, very important. So it's quite shocking ,you can sort of tell where voter fraud is happening, where they ban id, you know, like why would you ban, ID like in New York and California, it's like illegal to show idea at an election. Well, why would, I can't imagine why that would be the case…. So, two really important things is to ensure judicial integrity on Tuesday and then the voter ID thing It's April Fool's Day. So I think most people aren't aware, like I said, most people aren't aware that there is this important election, but there most people don't even know that there's an election at all. Or if they do, they aren't sure exactly when and where it is. — They don't realize just how important it is. They think it, it's, well it's just, you know, some kind of judicial thing that's not that important. But it actually, what they're doing, what's happening on Tuesday is a vote for the, the which party controls the U.S house of House of Representatives. That is why it is so, so significant and whichever party controls the house, to a significant degree controls the country, which then steers the course of Western civilization. So it's like, I feel like this is one of those things that, that may not seem that it's gonna affect the entire destiny of humanity, — it's a super, it's a super big deal. The fact that I'm here in person, like I'm not phoning it in. I'm here in person”
2:25

EVERYONE needs to be aware how SIGNIFICANT the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is This election decides who controls The House of Representatives and Voter ID Elon Musk “The single biggest challenge, I think is actually just making people aware that there is this very important election. There's both the very important election for Judge Schimel as well as the deciding on, on adding voter ID to the Wisconsin Constitution institution, which is very, very important. So it's quite shocking ,you can sort of tell where voter fraud is happening, where they ban id, you know, like why would you ban, ID like in New York and California, it's like illegal to show idea at an election. Well, why would, I can't imagine why that would be the case…. So, two really important things is to ensure judicial integrity on Tuesday and then the voter ID thing It's April Fool's Day. So I think most people aren't aware, like I said, most people aren't aware that there is this important election, but there most people don't even know that there's an election at all. Or if they do, they aren't sure exactly when and where it is. — They don't realize just how important it is. They think it, it's, well it's just, you know, some kind of judicial thing that's not that important. But it actually, what they're doing, what's happening on Tuesday is a vote for the, the which party controls the U.S house of House of Representatives. That is why it is so, so significant and whichever party controls the house, to a significant degree controls the country, which then steers the course of Western civilization. So it's like, I feel like this is one of those things that, that may not seem that it's gonna affect the entire destiny of humanity, — it's a super, it's a super big deal. The fact that I'm here in person, like I'm not phoning it in. I'm here in person”

Wall Street Apes

51,280 views • 1 year ago

Hospice nurses say there is a quiet moment that happens in the minutes before someone dies, and most families sitting right there in the room do not recognize it until it has already passed. It is not dramatic, it is not loud, and it looks almost like nothing at all if you do not know what you are seeing or what to look for. Nurses who have sat with hundreds of patients at the end of life describe it as one of the most profound and tender things they witness in their entire careers. The hardest part is that most families only find out what that moment was after the fact, during grief, when it is too late to go back and be fully present for it. You deserve to know what to look for before you are sitting in that room, not after you have already left it. Share this with anyone who has a loved one in hospice care or who is walking alongside someone in their final days.
2:37

Hospice nurses say there is a quiet moment that happens in the minutes before someone dies, and most families sitting right there in the room do not recognize it until it has already passed. It is not dramatic, it is not loud, and it looks almost like nothing at all if you do not know what you are seeing or what to look for. Nurses who have sat with hundreds of patients at the end of life describe it as one of the most profound and tender things they witness in their entire careers. The hardest part is that most families only find out what that moment was after the fact, during grief, when it is too late to go back and be fully present for it. You deserve to know what to look for before you are sitting in that room, not after you have already left it. Share this with anyone who has a loved one in hospice care or who is walking alongside someone in their final days.

Neal K. Shah

346,791 views • 2 months ago

What is happening in crypto right now is a resolution of the dislocation between expectations and fair value since the election in November. This is something we discussed and warned on the roundup on November 16th and ever since price has been flat/down and there's no signs of an SBR which is very different vs the expectations that were baked in. It is because of this concern for a potential dislocation that I/we have been on defence ever since the election after being disgustingly bullish in the lead up to it. The good news is this post-election premium is now being unwound, especially in alts. The bad news is this is happening during a time of relative equity strength. As traders, it is crucial to understand that markets are forward looking and you always need to be comparing expectations baked in vs reality, and not headlines on a standalone basis. Anyway. I'm sad to see the state of things right now and hopefully not too many people were carried out here. I do think that now that a lot of this dislocation has been resolved that the worst is over, but that is dependent on a positive macro environment which I'm not sure of. Godspeed. Forward Guidance Quinn Thompson Tyler Neville
1:43

What is happening in crypto right now is a resolution of the dislocation between expectations and fair value since the election in November. This is something we discussed and warned on the roundup on November 16th and ever since price has been flat/down and there's no signs of an SBR which is very different vs the expectations that were baked in. It is because of this concern for a potential dislocation that I/we have been on defence ever since the election after being disgustingly bullish in the lead up to it. The good news is this post-election premium is now being unwound, especially in alts. The bad news is this is happening during a time of relative equity strength. As traders, it is crucial to understand that markets are forward looking and you always need to be comparing expectations baked in vs reality, and not headlines on a standalone basis. Anyway. I'm sad to see the state of things right now and hopefully not too many people were carried out here. I do think that now that a lot of this dislocation has been resolved that the worst is over, but that is dependent on a positive macro environment which I'm not sure of. Godspeed. Forward Guidance Quinn Thompson Tyler Neville

fejau

133,844 views • 1 year ago

CNN’s Josh Campbell admits the ICE officer’s cellphone video of his deadly confrontation with Renee Good that the thud heard at the end *might be* sound of the officer being “struck by that vehicle,” but it *might NOT* and instead “could be from you know, the phone on his clothing.” He adds the video showed “wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over.” “Well, this is a critical new angle. This was the actual vantage point of the officer. And we know that not many immigration officers actually wear body worn cameras. But, in this instance, the immigration agent was holding his phone up, essentially filming this encounter, which we can now see in this video obtained by our colleague Holmes Lybrand. So, in the video, you see that the officers are making contact with Renee Good there. She’s parked somewhat perpendicular in a street. And there’s another woman that’s there, which is outside the vehicle. And you can tell, you know, as the exchange there with Renee Good that, you know, she’s being somewhat pleasant. The other woman is, you know, kind of mouthy. And, you know, this is obviously a bit a bit tense, you tells the agent at one point, you know, ‘why don’t you go get some lunch, big boy?’ You also see critically. And I’ll get to this in a second. Bystanders behind the vehicle. We’ve seen other angles. This one shows us again, the vantage point of that officer. Another agent orders Renee Good out of the vehicle. This agent then walks around. That is the moment that she then takes off. And, on that audio, what we hear, it appears that you can actually hear friction on the phone. You know, it appears from other angles that the agent was indeed struck by that vehicle. But you hear on the audio, it appears friction on the phone, that could be from the vehicle strike. That could be from you know, the phone on his clothing. But then it appears three shots were fired after that. And then you hear afterwards someone, it appears, maybe an immigration agent who was there, actually, you know, use profanity, you know, calling — calling her an f-ing B, which we heard on — on the audio there. Now, let’s talk about the tactics for a second so I can tell you this, as a former federal agent, that law enforcement officers can use deadly force only when necessary, when they believe that there is an imminent threat to their life. In this instance, you have a moving vehicle that’s coming at that agent. “Now, the driver, Renee Good, did turn the wheel to the right. So, it appears that she wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over. But nevertheless, an agent in that split second decision would have to make that calculation. Am I in danger? Is my life threatened here? You know, agents are also taught What are other options? Could you move out of the way? And that’s why this has been such a contentious issue here — the judgment, the decision of that agent to actually open fire. We’ve heard, you know, obviously, people supporting that decision, others, being quite critical. One other thing I want to note is that when agents undergo training and not just the feds, but law enforcement across the country, it is a cardinal rule that you are responsible for every round that you fire. And one key component of that is to the extent that you have the time and you can, you must be aware of what is beyond your shot, what is in the background? Here, it appears from that video that this other woman who had been engaging in the agent with the agent, was quite clearly in the line of fire. But there were also other people that were standing behind that car on the sidewalk. And this is a residential area. And so, I’m sure that will face some scrutiny as well. The officer opening fire at that moment, you know, directly, it appears towards those other people beyond the shot. And then his partners. And you brought this up, Brianna, just the other day, his partners are there in close range as well. And so, this will be heavily scrutinized from a tactical perspective as well. About the officer opening fire, but again, just critical, critical new video here that we’re seeing an important angle what the officer would have been seeing in the moment.”
3:25

CNN’s Josh Campbell admits the ICE officer’s cellphone video of his deadly confrontation with Renee Good that the thud heard at the end *might be* sound of the officer being “struck by that vehicle,” but it *might NOT* and instead “could be from you know, the phone on his clothing.” He adds the video showed “wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over.” “Well, this is a critical new angle. This was the actual vantage point of the officer. And we know that not many immigration officers actually wear body worn cameras. But, in this instance, the immigration agent was holding his phone up, essentially filming this encounter, which we can now see in this video obtained by our colleague Holmes Lybrand. So, in the video, you see that the officers are making contact with Renee Good there. She’s parked somewhat perpendicular in a street. And there’s another woman that’s there, which is outside the vehicle. And you can tell, you know, as the exchange there with Renee Good that, you know, she’s being somewhat pleasant. The other woman is, you know, kind of mouthy. And, you know, this is obviously a bit a bit tense, you tells the agent at one point, you know, ‘why don’t you go get some lunch, big boy?’ You also see critically. And I’ll get to this in a second. Bystanders behind the vehicle. We’ve seen other angles. This one shows us again, the vantage point of that officer. Another agent orders Renee Good out of the vehicle. This agent then walks around. That is the moment that she then takes off. And, on that audio, what we hear, it appears that you can actually hear friction on the phone. You know, it appears from other angles that the agent was indeed struck by that vehicle. But you hear on the audio, it appears friction on the phone, that could be from the vehicle strike. That could be from you know, the phone on his clothing. But then it appears three shots were fired after that. And then you hear afterwards someone, it appears, maybe an immigration agent who was there, actually, you know, use profanity, you know, calling — calling her an f-ing B, which we heard on — on the audio there. Now, let’s talk about the tactics for a second so I can tell you this, as a former federal agent, that law enforcement officers can use deadly force only when necessary, when they believe that there is an imminent threat to their life. In this instance, you have a moving vehicle that’s coming at that agent. “Now, the driver, Renee Good, did turn the wheel to the right. So, it appears that she wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over. But nevertheless, an agent in that split second decision would have to make that calculation. Am I in danger? Is my life threatened here? You know, agents are also taught What are other options? Could you move out of the way? And that’s why this has been such a contentious issue here — the judgment, the decision of that agent to actually open fire. We’ve heard, you know, obviously, people supporting that decision, others, being quite critical. One other thing I want to note is that when agents undergo training and not just the feds, but law enforcement across the country, it is a cardinal rule that you are responsible for every round that you fire. And one key component of that is to the extent that you have the time and you can, you must be aware of what is beyond your shot, what is in the background? Here, it appears from that video that this other woman who had been engaging in the agent with the agent, was quite clearly in the line of fire. But there were also other people that were standing behind that car on the sidewalk. And this is a residential area. And so, I’m sure that will face some scrutiny as well. The officer opening fire at that moment, you know, directly, it appears towards those other people beyond the shot. And then his partners. And you brought this up, Brianna, just the other day, his partners are there in close range as well. And so, this will be heavily scrutinized from a tactical perspective as well. About the officer opening fire, but again, just critical, critical new video here that we’re seeing an important angle what the officer would have been seeing in the moment.”

Curtis Houck

68,500 views • 7 months ago

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!
2:59

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!

Capt KEVman!!!

46,092 views • 6 months ago

🚨CNN’s Dana Bash goes full state-run media hack, clashes with Sen. Tim Scott over "misinformation" and election integrity. Holy smokes. There is zero daylight between Bash and a combative Kamala campaign propagandist in this entire segment — because she is one: - "[Trump’s] setting the stage for his supporters not to believe the results if he loses. Do you want him to stop doing that???" - "I can't let go of the fact that you are saying it is the media spreading claims. It is not true!" - "We saw what happened on January 6th as a result of that and many other things. Are you saying right now you want to lead this conversation and say you are okay with his rhetoric?!?" - "So if you believe you just said that you believe that the election will be free and fair. So does that mean that you are confident that if Donald Trump loses? I know you think he's going to win, but let's just play this out. If he loses that, he will concede!??" Pure propaganda press stuff here on the eve of an election. There is zero trust in legacy media. And they wonder why.
4:08

🚨CNN’s Dana Bash goes full state-run media hack, clashes with Sen. Tim Scott over "misinformation" and election integrity. Holy smokes. There is zero daylight between Bash and a combative Kamala campaign propagandist in this entire segment — because she is one: - "[Trump’s] setting the stage for his supporters not to believe the results if he loses. Do you want him to stop doing that???" - "I can't let go of the fact that you are saying it is the media spreading claims. It is not true!" - "We saw what happened on January 6th as a result of that and many other things. Are you saying right now you want to lead this conversation and say you are okay with his rhetoric?!?" - "So if you believe you just said that you believe that the election will be free and fair. So does that mean that you are confident that if Donald Trump loses? I know you think he's going to win, but let's just play this out. If he loses that, he will concede!??" Pure propaganda press stuff here on the eve of an election. There is zero trust in legacy media. And they wonder why.

Western Lensman

819,339 views • 1 year ago

.Joseph Moreno bursts the liberal bubble on CNN about Jimmy Kimmel's suspension: “I don’t think this is a legal issue. I don’t think this can be pointed to the FCC or the trump administration and say, well, this is about them going after Kimmel because of what he said. Personally, I think it’s more of a cultural issue. And I got to tell you. I’m about as moderate a Republican as you can get. I’m from New York. I have not been comfortable watching late-night television for 15 years because when you have conservative leanings and you’re constantly mocked and you’re constantly feel like you’re doing something wrong, you shut it off. You don’t watch it anymore. And then what happens is it’s circular. If the host doesn’t have that audience, the host doesn’t worry about keeping an audience like that. It goes in circles. And, at some point, you get things like this where you say things.”
0:43

.Joseph Moreno bursts the liberal bubble on CNN about Jimmy Kimmel's suspension: “I don’t think this is a legal issue. I don’t think this can be pointed to the FCC or the trump administration and say, well, this is about them going after Kimmel because of what he said. Personally, I think it’s more of a cultural issue. And I got to tell you. I’m about as moderate a Republican as you can get. I’m from New York. I have not been comfortable watching late-night television for 15 years because when you have conservative leanings and you’re constantly mocked and you’re constantly feel like you’re doing something wrong, you shut it off. You don’t watch it anymore. And then what happens is it’s circular. If the host doesn’t have that audience, the host doesn’t worry about keeping an audience like that. It goes in circles. And, at some point, you get things like this where you say things.”

Curtis Houck

836,846 views • 11 months ago