Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

New exploit: “xor dword [0xf80c2094], 1<<22” Unlocks CPU microcode, the platform security processor, system management mode, and every internal processor register, all at once, on 100 million AMD CPUs. As far as I can tell can’t be fixed.

xoreaxeaxeax's profile picture

domas

11,624 subscribers

1,047,922 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Hello my beautiful Spartans . I will be live at the upcoming @mcf_fairandfest event happening on the 28th of October at Landmark event Center Lagos . As a way to show my appreciation for the unwavering support I will be giving away 10 free booths to my wonderful fans . I am also using this opportunity to invite all Spartans to register, be at the fair, and support not only me, but other amazing entrepreneurs as well as Officialcegar . To register please click on the link on @mcf_fairandfest Bio . Once again thank y’all for your love and unconditional support and I can’t wait to see y’all . ❤️
2:02

Hello my beautiful Spartans . I will be live at the upcoming @mcf_fairandfest event happening on the 28th of October at Landmark event Center Lagos . As a way to show my appreciation for the unwavering support I will be giving away 10 free booths to my wonderful fans . I am also using this opportunity to invite all Spartans to register, be at the fair, and support not only me, but other amazing entrepreneurs as well as Officialcegar . To register please click on the link on @mcf_fairandfest Bio . Once again thank y’all for your love and unconditional support and I can’t wait to see y’all . ❤️

Cynthia Nwadiora

180,189 views • 2 years ago

Tuesday 23rd June. On our way into central London for very significant meetings. As soon as I can, will disclose. Also; Horrified by yet more egregious scandal from the @NHSNotts yesterday. Failures at every level proven across all three hospital trusts. Yet Chief Execs and Chair retire with golden pensions and payouts; and senior management promoted upwards. Despite years of failure. Morally bankrupt. Accountability must be at all levels. Top down…. #nottinghaminquiry 💛💚
1:53

Tuesday 23rd June. On our way into central London for very significant meetings. As soon as I can, will disclose. Also; Horrified by yet more egregious scandal from the @NHSNotts yesterday. Failures at every level proven across all three hospital trusts. Yet Chief Execs and Chair retire with golden pensions and payouts; and senior management promoted upwards. Despite years of failure. Morally bankrupt. Accountability must be at all levels. Top down…. #nottinghaminquiry 💛💚

Emma

48,219 views • 1 month ago

🚨 JUST IN — KRISTI NOEM on being replaced by Markwayne Mullin as DHS Secretary, moving to a new role: "The Western Hemisphere is absolutely critical for U.S. security. In this new role, I will be able to build on the partnerships and national security expertise, I forged over the last 13 months as Secretary of Homeland Security." "We have made historic accomplishments at the Department of Homeland Security to make America safe again: we delivered the MOST secure border in American history, 3 million illegal aliens have left the U.S., we have located 145,000 children, FEMA delivered disaster relief at a 100% faster rate, we ushered in the golden age of travel, saved the American taxpayer $13 billion and revitalized the U.S. Coast Guard."
0:47

🚨 JUST IN — KRISTI NOEM on being replaced by Markwayne Mullin as DHS Secretary, moving to a new role: "The Western Hemisphere is absolutely critical for U.S. security. In this new role, I will be able to build on the partnerships and national security expertise, I forged over the last 13 months as Secretary of Homeland Security." "We have made historic accomplishments at the Department of Homeland Security to make America safe again: we delivered the MOST secure border in American history, 3 million illegal aliens have left the U.S., we have located 145,000 children, FEMA delivered disaster relief at a 100% faster rate, we ushered in the golden age of travel, saved the American taxpayer $13 billion and revitalized the U.S. Coast Guard."

Eric Daugherty

22,533 views • 5 months ago

Silver Palace Performance Results After 48 Hours of Testing !! 1. The game currently runs worse than Wuthering Waves, with frequent frame drops. 2. The developers have released 3 updates so far, and I noticed that the CPU bottleneck has been reduced. 3. These results are on DLSS Quality. DLAA has even more stuttering. Question: Is it fixable? Answer: It depends. No matter what, this game is going to be very demanding. If you look at NTE, it uses a hybrid graphics system where you can disable SSR through presets, but Silver Palace doesn't have an option like that. Combined with other heavy graphical effects, performance takes a noticeable hit. This hybrid system should have been available from the start. Since we're only in CBT2, I expect some improvements before launch. Based on my testing, the game will likely perform similarly to STALKER 2, and performance will also depend heavily on Frame Generation. I also noticed CPU bottlenecks on both DLAA and DLSS in almost every area. Things that need to be added: Render Distance setting — this would significantly reduce CPU bottlenecks for mid-range and low-end CPUs. #SilverPalace #Gacha
1:09

Silver Palace Performance Results After 48 Hours of Testing !! 1. The game currently runs worse than Wuthering Waves, with frequent frame drops. 2. The developers have released 3 updates so far, and I noticed that the CPU bottleneck has been reduced. 3. These results are on DLSS Quality. DLAA has even more stuttering. Question: Is it fixable? Answer: It depends. No matter what, this game is going to be very demanding. If you look at NTE, it uses a hybrid graphics system where you can disable SSR through presets, but Silver Palace doesn't have an option like that. Combined with other heavy graphical effects, performance takes a noticeable hit. This hybrid system should have been available from the start. Since we're only in CBT2, I expect some improvements before launch. Based on my testing, the game will likely perform similarly to STALKER 2, and performance will also depend heavily on Frame Generation. I also noticed CPU bottlenecks on both DLAA and DLSS in almost every area. Things that need to be added: Render Distance setting — this would significantly reduce CPU bottlenecks for mid-range and low-end CPUs. #SilverPalace #Gacha

Kaito

133,661 views • 21 days ago

Thread: Disclosure of UFO Site I will be doing a space to take questions when I have posted all the following, please do not reply as I put this thread together And obviously it is evidence it is not 100% guaranteed in any way at all and it may not be the same UFO that Ross Coulthart refers to but it is far too large to move, officially NUFORC reported and recorded as being on the base and in a building which had to undergo over 1 billion dollars of additional construction on the same day that the report came through The building has electromagnetic and specialist security protection as well as 24-hour guard The building is more expensive than the pentagon in terms of its cost per square meter The people in it are not allowed anywhere near the lower floors Please read all the information
1:49

Thread: Disclosure of UFO Site I will be doing a space to take questions when I have posted all the following, please do not reply as I put this thread together And obviously it is evidence it is not 100% guaranteed in any way at all and it may not be the same UFO that Ross Coulthart refers to but it is far too large to move, officially NUFORC reported and recorded as being on the base and in a building which had to undergo over 1 billion dollars of additional construction on the same day that the report came through The building has electromagnetic and specialist security protection as well as 24-hour guard The building is more expensive than the pentagon in terms of its cost per square meter The people in it are not allowed anywhere near the lower floors Please read all the information

Moneypenny

328,975 views • 1 year ago

EXPOSING MEDIA AND POLITICIANS LIES IT IS SO IMPORTANT FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE THIS FAR AND WIDE!!!! Elon Musk The media, politicians, all of them are telling the British public I have used your platform to instigate violence and riots, which is the polar opposite of what I have used the X platform for. Unfortunately, as they have managed to censor me and others like me on all other big tech platforms they are now coming for X, to pressure you into censoring me as well. Why? So they can lie to the public and manipulate the narrative. Download this video and upload it everywhere, then challenge the media narrative with it at every opportunity. #TwoTierKeir #TwoTierPolicing
11:07

EXPOSING MEDIA AND POLITICIANS LIES IT IS SO IMPORTANT FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE THIS FAR AND WIDE!!!! Elon Musk The media, politicians, all of them are telling the British public I have used your platform to instigate violence and riots, which is the polar opposite of what I have used the X platform for. Unfortunately, as they have managed to censor me and others like me on all other big tech platforms they are now coming for X, to pressure you into censoring me as well. Why? So they can lie to the public and manipulate the narrative. Download this video and upload it everywhere, then challenge the media narrative with it at every opportunity. #TwoTierKeir #TwoTierPolicing

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

8,295,968 views • 2 years ago

Two years as YouTube Liaison today! Looking back at this intro video now, it’s humbling to see how far everything has come and how far it can all still go! It’s an indescribable privilege getting to end almost each day, every day, having helped fellow creators share their voice, ensure their agency, and build an ever-better future — at YouTube scale Deepest thanks to the brilliant, empathetic, insightful YouTube creators and creators of YouTube who are on this once-in-a-lifetime journey with me, I can’t wait to see what we debate, collaborate on, and achieve together in year three!
2:18

Two years as YouTube Liaison today! Looking back at this intro video now, it’s humbling to see how far everything has come and how far it can all still go! It’s an indescribable privilege getting to end almost each day, every day, having helped fellow creators share their voice, ensure their agency, and build an ever-better future — at YouTube scale Deepest thanks to the brilliant, empathetic, insightful YouTube creators and creators of YouTube who are on this once-in-a-lifetime journey with me, I can’t wait to see what we debate, collaborate on, and achieve together in year three!

Rene Ritchie

15,239 views • 2 years ago

Every day we are in contact with our partners – negotiations, meetings. It is important that everything be as practical as possible – what forces on the ground, in the air, at sea – everything must be clearly defined. And the foundation of security is our strong army, Ukraine’s Defense Forces, which means long-term financing for the army and the provision of weapons – all of this will be ensured. I thank every partner who is already with us. On our side, everything will be prepared to the fullest to end this war. It is important that our partners confirm this. And further, everything will depend exclusively on the will of the world’s leaders – above all, the United States – to put pressure on Russia. New steps are needed, new pressure – sanctions, tariffs – all of this must be on the table.
3:37

Every day we are in contact with our partners – negotiations, meetings. It is important that everything be as practical as possible – what forces on the ground, in the air, at sea – everything must be clearly defined. And the foundation of security is our strong army, Ukraine’s Defense Forces, which means long-term financing for the army and the provision of weapons – all of this will be ensured. I thank every partner who is already with us. On our side, everything will be prepared to the fullest to end this war. It is important that our partners confirm this. And further, everything will depend exclusively on the will of the world’s leaders – above all, the United States – to put pressure on Russia. New steps are needed, new pressure – sanctions, tariffs – all of this must be on the table.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

277,220 views • 11 months ago

“If today I can stand up and go and call that press conference at some point in my life I also wore camouflage uniform maybe I should also wear one, go make a conference as well and talk things but I will be fired from the podium same time” Lt-General Shadrack Sibiya “But some people because they've got a very powerful social media that they have invested in. Every TikTok that you open, no police official is allowed to do what General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi is doing, he is the only one that campaigns and is funded on TikTok” Lt-General Shadrack Sibiya at the Ad Hoc committee
1:16

“If today I can stand up and go and call that press conference at some point in my life I also wore camouflage uniform maybe I should also wear one, go make a conference as well and talk things but I will be fired from the podium same time” Lt-General Shadrack Sibiya “But some people because they've got a very powerful social media that they have invested in. Every TikTok that you open, no police official is allowed to do what General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi is doing, he is the only one that campaigns and is funded on TikTok” Lt-General Shadrack Sibiya at the Ad Hoc committee

News Live SA

53,349 views • 10 months ago

Every single time I talk about the benefits of breastfeeding, I get comments saying “you’re mom shaming, not everyone can produce milk.” Here’s the truth: most people who formula feed CAN produce but CHOOSE not to. Exhibit A right here. This woman refuses to breastfeed and went as far as getting a medication to purposely dry up her milk. She even goes as far as telling women to avoid doctors that try to convince you to breastfeed. Just as a reminder, breastfeeding decreases your baby’s chances of: Autism Respiratory Infections Ear Infections SIDS Asthma Childhood Obesity Eczema And so much more. It’s not a doctor’s job to validate your choices. It is their job to tell you the risks and benefits of every choice and for you to make the ultimate decision. For me personally, I want to ensure my baby has the best chance at a healthy life, so I will be giving it my all to breastfeed.
2:56

Every single time I talk about the benefits of breastfeeding, I get comments saying “you’re mom shaming, not everyone can produce milk.” Here’s the truth: most people who formula feed CAN produce but CHOOSE not to. Exhibit A right here. This woman refuses to breastfeed and went as far as getting a medication to purposely dry up her milk. She even goes as far as telling women to avoid doctors that try to convince you to breastfeed. Just as a reminder, breastfeeding decreases your baby’s chances of: Autism Respiratory Infections Ear Infections SIDS Asthma Childhood Obesity Eczema And so much more. It’s not a doctor’s job to validate your choices. It is their job to tell you the risks and benefits of every choice and for you to make the ultimate decision. For me personally, I want to ensure my baby has the best chance at a healthy life, so I will be giving it my all to breastfeed.

Anna Matson

95,761 views • 4 months ago

$AMD Strategic Price Positioning Long🧵 AMD is increasingly the most hated semi stock that can rival $NVDA dominance in GPUs and software(Cuda v. ROCm). $AMD is also the most under-owned among all Funds in 2025 according to Bank of America! For what I learnt for years as an investor with Dr. Lisa Su, all analysts and market are underestimate Dr. Su leadership. $AMD is capable of raising price, making high quality hardware with software. Dr. Su or AMD choice to adopt a lower price strategy to gain market share is a deliberate and multifacets approach rooted in competitive positioning, market dynamics, and long-term growth objectives. As an investor, it may take time like CPUs and embedded to see margin improving. 1. . Penetration Pricing to Challenge Dominant Competitors AMD has historically positioned itself as a cost-effective alternative to dominant players like Intel in CPUs and Nvidia in GPUs. By setting prices lower than competitors, AMD aims to attract customers and quickly gain market share. This is a classic penetration pricing strategy, where the goal is to capture a significant portion of the market by offering high-performance products at a lower price point. ~CPU Market Example: When AMD launched its Ryzen processors in 2017, it priced them competitively compared to Intel's Core processors, emphasizing a better price-to-performance ratio. Ryzen CPUs offered higher core counts and multi-core performance at lower prices, appealing to cost-conscious consumers, gamers, and professionals. This strategy helped AMD increase its CPU market share to 16.6% by early 2025, narrowing the gap with Intel. ~GPU Market Context: In the GPU market, where Nvidia holds an 88% share compared to AMD's 12%, AMD has been criticized for not launching GPUs at low enough prices to compete effectively. However, posts on X and articles suggest AMD is shifting its GPU strategy to focus on mainstream, cost-effective products rather than high-end enthusiast segments, aiming to regain market share through competitive pricing. 2. Appealing to Cost-Conscious Market Segments AMD targets price-sensitive customers, including gamers, small businesses, and enterprises looking for high-performance computing at a lower cost. This is particularly effective in segments where performance is critical, but budgets are constrained. ~Value Proposition: AMD’s Ryzen and EPYC processors, as well as Radeon GPUs, are designed to deliver performance comparable to or better than competitors in specific workloads (e.g., multi-core processing or AI compute) at a lower price. For example, Ryzen processors have been noted for their superior multi-core performance compared to Intel CPUs at similar or lower price points, making them attractive for tasks like video editing or gaming. ~AI and Data Center: In the AI and data center markets, AMD’s cost-effective Instinct MI300X GPUs and EPYC CPUs target enterprises seeking affordable alternatives to Nvidia’s expensive AI ecosystem. This strategy taps into an underleveraged market segment that Nvidia’s broad, premium-priced AI solutions may not fully address. 3. Building Scale and Developer Support AMD’s leadership, including Jack Huynh, has emphasized the importance of scale—gaining a larger market share to attract developer support and optimize software ecosystems. A lower price strategy helps AMD achieve this by increasing adoption among consumers and enterprises. ~Gaming GPUs: By focusing on mainstream GPUs with competitive pricing (e.g., targeting an 80% addressable market rather than the high-end 10%), AMD aims to build a larger user base. This scale encourages developers to optimize games for AMD’s technologies, such as FSR 3 (FidelityFX Super Resolution) and Anti-Lag 2, improving the ecosystem and competitiveness against Nvidia’s CUDA platform. ~Open Ecosystem in AI: AMD’s open-source ROCm platform contrasts with Nvidia’s proprietary CUDA, appealing to developers who prefer flexibility. Lower-priced hardware makes it easier for developers to adopt AMD’s solutions, fostering a broader AI software ecosystem. 4. Historical Context and Brand Positioning Since its founding in 1969, AMD has positioned itself as a challenger brand, often acting as a “second source” supplier to Intel. This role required competitive pricing to gain a foothold in markets dominated by established players. Over time, AMD has built a reputation for quality and affordability, reinforced by products like the Am9080 (a reverse-engineered Intel 8080) and modern Ryzen and EPYC lines. This historical strategy of undercutting competitors’ prices while delivering comparable performance continues to define AMD’s approach. 5. Countering Competitor Dominance AMD operates in highly competitive markets where Intel and Nvidia have significant advantages in brand recognition, market share, and ecosystems. A lower price strategy is a pragmatic way to disrupt this in CPUs: ~Intel’s historical dominance in the CPU market (servers, desktops, and laptops) has been challenged by AMD’s Ryzen and EPYC processors, which offer better value. For instance, AMD’s EPYC CPUs have driven a 122% year-over-year revenue increase in the data center segment, partly due to their cost-effectiveness, helping AMD capture 94% of CPU sales at some retailers. ~Nvidia in GPUs: Nvidia’s 88% GPU market share and premium pricing (e.g., high-end GPUs like the RTX 4090) leave room for AMD to compete in the mid-to-low range. However, AMD’s failure to launch GPUs at sufficiently low prices (e.g., the RX 7900 XT at $900 instead of its current $680) has limited its success, prompting a strategic shift toward more aggressive pricing in future RDNA 4 GPUs. 6. Market Share as a Long-Term Investment AMD’s lower price strategy is not just about immediate sales but also about long-term market positioning. By capturing market share, AMD can: ~Increase Brand Loyalty: Affordable, high-performance products build customer loyalty, especially among gamers and small businesses, creating a foundation for future sales. ~Drive Revenue Growth: Market share gains in CPUs (e.g., 16.6% in 2025) and data centers (e.g., $3.5 billion in Q3 revenue) translate into higher revenue, even if margins are initially lower. ~Influence Industry Standards: Greater market presence allows AMD to influence hardware and software standards, such as pushing for open-source AI frameworks or gaming optimizations, reducing reliance on competitors’ proprietary systems. 7. Challenges and Risks While effective, AMD’s lower price strategy carries risks: ~Profitability Concerns: Lower prices can compress profit margins, and some analysts note that AMD’s high stock valuation expects future profitability that may be delayed if pricing remains aggressive. ~Perception of Quality: Persistently low prices risk positioning AMD as a “budget” brand, potentially undermining its ability to compete in premium segments. ~Competitor Response: Intel and Nvidia can counter with price cuts or superior features, as seen with Nvidia’s feature-rich GPUs. AMD must balance price with innovation to avoid being outmaneuvered. 8. Strategic Shift in GPUs Recent reports indicate AMD is adjusting its GPU strategy to prioritize market share over competing in the high-end enthusiast segment. For the upcoming Radeon RX 8000 series (RDNA 4), AMD is focusing on mainstream GPUs priced competitively to appeal to a broader audience, rather than chasing Nvidia’s high-end dominance. This shift aligns with AMD’s broader goal of achieving 40–50% market share by targeting the “80%” of the market that prioritizes affordability over premium features. Lastly, AMD’s lower price strategy is a calculated move to disrupt Intel and Nvidia’s dominance, capture market share, and build scale for long-term growth. By offering high-performance CPUs and GPUs at competitive prices, AMD appeals to cost-conscious consumers and enterprises, particularly in the CPU and AI markets, where it has seen significant gains (e.g., 16.6% CPU market share and $3.5 billion in data center revenue). Recent price increase on MI350 and MI355 and more on MI400 signaled #AI chip leadership and pricing power, which will result in significant top and bottom line growth.
5:19

$AMD Strategic Price Positioning Long🧵 AMD is increasingly the most hated semi stock that can rival $NVDA dominance in GPUs and software(Cuda v. ROCm). $AMD is also the most under-owned among all Funds in 2025 according to Bank of America! For what I learnt for years as an investor with Dr. Lisa Su, all analysts and market are underestimate Dr. Su leadership. $AMD is capable of raising price, making high quality hardware with software. Dr. Su or AMD choice to adopt a lower price strategy to gain market share is a deliberate and multifacets approach rooted in competitive positioning, market dynamics, and long-term growth objectives. As an investor, it may take time like CPUs and embedded to see margin improving. 1. . Penetration Pricing to Challenge Dominant Competitors AMD has historically positioned itself as a cost-effective alternative to dominant players like Intel in CPUs and Nvidia in GPUs. By setting prices lower than competitors, AMD aims to attract customers and quickly gain market share. This is a classic penetration pricing strategy, where the goal is to capture a significant portion of the market by offering high-performance products at a lower price point. ~CPU Market Example: When AMD launched its Ryzen processors in 2017, it priced them competitively compared to Intel's Core processors, emphasizing a better price-to-performance ratio. Ryzen CPUs offered higher core counts and multi-core performance at lower prices, appealing to cost-conscious consumers, gamers, and professionals. This strategy helped AMD increase its CPU market share to 16.6% by early 2025, narrowing the gap with Intel. ~GPU Market Context: In the GPU market, where Nvidia holds an 88% share compared to AMD's 12%, AMD has been criticized for not launching GPUs at low enough prices to compete effectively. However, posts on X and articles suggest AMD is shifting its GPU strategy to focus on mainstream, cost-effective products rather than high-end enthusiast segments, aiming to regain market share through competitive pricing. 2. Appealing to Cost-Conscious Market Segments AMD targets price-sensitive customers, including gamers, small businesses, and enterprises looking for high-performance computing at a lower cost. This is particularly effective in segments where performance is critical, but budgets are constrained. ~Value Proposition: AMD’s Ryzen and EPYC processors, as well as Radeon GPUs, are designed to deliver performance comparable to or better than competitors in specific workloads (e.g., multi-core processing or AI compute) at a lower price. For example, Ryzen processors have been noted for their superior multi-core performance compared to Intel CPUs at similar or lower price points, making them attractive for tasks like video editing or gaming. ~AI and Data Center: In the AI and data center markets, AMD’s cost-effective Instinct MI300X GPUs and EPYC CPUs target enterprises seeking affordable alternatives to Nvidia’s expensive AI ecosystem. This strategy taps into an underleveraged market segment that Nvidia’s broad, premium-priced AI solutions may not fully address. 3. Building Scale and Developer Support AMD’s leadership, including Jack Huynh, has emphasized the importance of scale—gaining a larger market share to attract developer support and optimize software ecosystems. A lower price strategy helps AMD achieve this by increasing adoption among consumers and enterprises. ~Gaming GPUs: By focusing on mainstream GPUs with competitive pricing (e.g., targeting an 80% addressable market rather than the high-end 10%), AMD aims to build a larger user base. This scale encourages developers to optimize games for AMD’s technologies, such as FSR 3 (FidelityFX Super Resolution) and Anti-Lag 2, improving the ecosystem and competitiveness against Nvidia’s CUDA platform. ~Open Ecosystem in AI: AMD’s open-source ROCm platform contrasts with Nvidia’s proprietary CUDA, appealing to developers who prefer flexibility. Lower-priced hardware makes it easier for developers to adopt AMD’s solutions, fostering a broader AI software ecosystem. 4. Historical Context and Brand Positioning Since its founding in 1969, AMD has positioned itself as a challenger brand, often acting as a “second source” supplier to Intel. This role required competitive pricing to gain a foothold in markets dominated by established players. Over time, AMD has built a reputation for quality and affordability, reinforced by products like the Am9080 (a reverse-engineered Intel 8080) and modern Ryzen and EPYC lines. This historical strategy of undercutting competitors’ prices while delivering comparable performance continues to define AMD’s approach. 5. Countering Competitor Dominance AMD operates in highly competitive markets where Intel and Nvidia have significant advantages in brand recognition, market share, and ecosystems. A lower price strategy is a pragmatic way to disrupt this in CPUs: ~Intel’s historical dominance in the CPU market (servers, desktops, and laptops) has been challenged by AMD’s Ryzen and EPYC processors, which offer better value. For instance, AMD’s EPYC CPUs have driven a 122% year-over-year revenue increase in the data center segment, partly due to their cost-effectiveness, helping AMD capture 94% of CPU sales at some retailers. ~Nvidia in GPUs: Nvidia’s 88% GPU market share and premium pricing (e.g., high-end GPUs like the RTX 4090) leave room for AMD to compete in the mid-to-low range. However, AMD’s failure to launch GPUs at sufficiently low prices (e.g., the RX 7900 XT at $900 instead of its current $680) has limited its success, prompting a strategic shift toward more aggressive pricing in future RDNA 4 GPUs. 6. Market Share as a Long-Term Investment AMD’s lower price strategy is not just about immediate sales but also about long-term market positioning. By capturing market share, AMD can: ~Increase Brand Loyalty: Affordable, high-performance products build customer loyalty, especially among gamers and small businesses, creating a foundation for future sales. ~Drive Revenue Growth: Market share gains in CPUs (e.g., 16.6% in 2025) and data centers (e.g., $3.5 billion in Q3 revenue) translate into higher revenue, even if margins are initially lower. ~Influence Industry Standards: Greater market presence allows AMD to influence hardware and software standards, such as pushing for open-source AI frameworks or gaming optimizations, reducing reliance on competitors’ proprietary systems. 7. Challenges and Risks While effective, AMD’s lower price strategy carries risks: ~Profitability Concerns: Lower prices can compress profit margins, and some analysts note that AMD’s high stock valuation expects future profitability that may be delayed if pricing remains aggressive. ~Perception of Quality: Persistently low prices risk positioning AMD as a “budget” brand, potentially undermining its ability to compete in premium segments. ~Competitor Response: Intel and Nvidia can counter with price cuts or superior features, as seen with Nvidia’s feature-rich GPUs. AMD must balance price with innovation to avoid being outmaneuvered. 8. Strategic Shift in GPUs Recent reports indicate AMD is adjusting its GPU strategy to prioritize market share over competing in the high-end enthusiast segment. For the upcoming Radeon RX 8000 series (RDNA 4), AMD is focusing on mainstream GPUs priced competitively to appeal to a broader audience, rather than chasing Nvidia’s high-end dominance. This shift aligns with AMD’s broader goal of achieving 40–50% market share by targeting the “80%” of the market that prioritizes affordability over premium features. Lastly, AMD’s lower price strategy is a calculated move to disrupt Intel and Nvidia’s dominance, capture market share, and build scale for long-term growth. By offering high-performance CPUs and GPUs at competitive prices, AMD appeals to cost-conscious consumers and enterprises, particularly in the CPU and AI markets, where it has seen significant gains (e.g., 16.6% CPU market share and $3.5 billion in data center revenue). Recent price increase on MI350 and MI355 and more on MI400 signaled #AI chip leadership and pricing power, which will result in significant top and bottom line growth.

Mike

38,006 views • 11 months ago

$AMD is easily a $1,200 stock IMO| CPUs TAM 🧵 Not Financial Advice! DYOR! In this thread, I want to discuss the actual TAM for CPUs data center for just 2026, where many are giving different ranges, where I don't agree with. I will explain in detail why I disagree with these research firms and financial analysts using Math. And this thread should not be treated as Financial Advice. I'm just explaining my research and thought process so we can have a discussion. In 2024/2025, I gave out $620 PT for FY2026 was too conservative for AMD potential. At the time, It was early and many were just laughing, that PT was unrealistic and the AI world is run on GPUs only. Today, most of these folks are laughing with me. That is ok, I dont offer financial advice, and I do not need everyone to agree with me. I respect other opinions. If you enjoy this kind of thread, slap the like/repost/bookmark. If you want to support my work further and gain more in-depth analysis, consider subscribe! In early 2026, hyperscalers, enterprises, and OEMs are scrambling as Intel and AMD server CPUs are largely sold out for the year, with prices jumping 10–20% and lead times stretching from weeks to months (or longer for certain SKUs). What was once a GPU dominated story has flipped: the shift to explosive Agentic AI with its multi-step reasoning loops, tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, real-time data movement, and reinforcement learning, is dramatically tightening CPU:GPU ratios from the old training-era 1:4–8 all the way to 1:1 to 5:1 or even CPU-heavy configurations. CEOs across NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and public companies have been sounding the alarm on CNBC, Bloomberg, and earnings calls. CPUs are “cool again,” and in many agentic deployments they are becoming the new bottleneck alongside (or even ahead of) GPUs and custom ASICs. In 2025, roughly 12-15m AI GPUs + AI ASICs GPUs shipped, and is expect to be 15-20m units by 2026, where it suggesting Training demand is not going away. The actual TAM is structural, multiplicative demand that has already forced AMD to double its long-term server CPU TAM forecast to >$120 billion by 2030 (>35% CAGR), with Dr. Lisa Su noting Q2 2026 server CPU sales expected to surge 70%+ year-over-year and demand “far exceeding expectations.” At the same time, AMD’s secured 30–40% share of TSMC’s initial 2nm capacity (behind only Apple’s >50%) positions it to ramp Zen 6-based EPYC Venice exactly when this agentic wave hits hardest but even that aggressive five-fab 2nm expansion (with plans scaling toward 11 total advanced facilities) cannot instantly close the gap in the near-term. Supply constraints on wafers, advanced packaging, and power are compounding the squeeze, just as hyperscalers forward-buy and lock in long-term deals. 1. The actual potential TAM Various sources and institutions are giving $50-$160-$200B CPUs TAM toward 2030, and i disagree, where supply is severely behind vs Demand by at least 2-3 years or even longer by some estimates. The actual TAM will probably be 15-20m for FY2026. The typical average selling price from low to high end is $5,000 to $15,000, but due to rising memory, and different inflationary pressures on Semi, it would be more logical to think between $7,000-17,000. A. CPU:GPU Ratio at 1:1 A basic calucation at mid range =12,000 x 15-20m CPUs= $180-$240B TAM B. CPU:GPU Ratio at 5:1 = $12,000 x 75m-100m CPUs= $900B-$1.2T TAM Of course TSMC cannot even supply 20% of this massive inflection TAM in 2026. But do we think of Demand for TAM or Supply for TAM? Hence we are seeing massive 2nm Ramp from TSMC for $AMD. IMO, conservatively, I would take down 15-20% on 1:1 or $135-$192B TAM for just 2026. Im not even talking about 2030. We are just months into this, it is impossible to estimate Cagr atm, but this is 1-5 agents running tasks, I wrote a thread on 24/7 autonomous agents thread, where companies could use 50-250 agents to run tasks for them 24/7. It would require a different structural CPU:GPU to bring down the cost of token as well as handling the Orchestration bottleneck. GPUs would be useless and sit idle waiting for CPU due to highly CPU-intensive nature. The cost per Million tokens must come down more rapidly for this 50-250 autonomous agents to work, otherwise the token cost would be too enormous. Helios Rack is estimated to bring inference cost down to $0.0003-$0.0005/M tokens with 18 EPYC Venices along with 72 MI455x and other chips+ Components. A heavier or CPUs dense rack would bring down inference cost further. EPYC Verano(2027 gen 7 AI-optimized) is expected to drive inference costs meaningfully lower than the Venice baseline likely to the $0.00002–$0.00025 per million tokens range (or even sub-$0.00015 in highly optimized agentic/batch workloads). Verano have higher core counts than Venice, LPDDR5X SOCAMM2 memory support, more AI optimized and Next-Gen rack density & efficiency. 2. $AMD secured at least 30-40% of TSMC 2nm capacity and Memory from Samsung through 2028-2030. 2 2nm fabs are entering ramping phase toward 60-65k wafers per months and 5 dedicated 2nm fabs entering mass production/ramp in 2026. Will link sub threads below if you are interest for full detail. Apple is reported to secure 50%+ 2nm capacity for Iphone 18 and Mac chips and AMD secured at least 30-40% capacity while $NVDA $AVGO $ARM $AMZN $GOOGL and others are on 3nm. This broader aggressive ramp from TSMC to target up to 11 fabs is to address $AMD massive growth ahead. Where $ARM is facing massive CPUs supply constraints as they have to compete with other Mega Cap players on 3nm allocation. And $INTC is also facing supply constraints for data center CPUs and PC per management with lead times extrended to longer than 12 weeks. Dr. Su is aiming for higher than 50%+ Market share, and I believe it is achievable in 2026 or 2027 as AMD has the strongest CPUs offerings. Dr. Su did not want to take advantage of the shortage and she said during the Q1 earning call, AMD is prioritizing Units shipped while guiding margin to be inching 60%. If Jensen were in charge, I'm sure margin would be 70-75% in this kind of severe CPUs shortage condition. But that is not how Dr. Su operates for more than a decade. She wants most market share. So we will see it in revenue growth, but as TSMC ramps faster and faster, AMD Operating and FCF margin will massively improve vs prior decade. A significantly higher margin profile than before. 3. How I came up with $1,200 withint 12-18 months? At $1,200/ share, that would be around $2 Trillion MC. I expect FY2027 revenue to be $124-$144B where data center revenue dominates overall revenue. AI GPUs: I will stick to the lowest end so show u that I'm conservative at $18B for each GW vs $NVDA Rubin is $30B+ (most likely Helios Rack in the $20B+ due to memory price rising). We know deals with OpenAI and Meta are around 12GW and additional multi-customers at multi-GW scale were hinted and will be revealed as we get to July 22-23 2026 Advancing AI event. For now I will conservatively add a bit more to this model. (3-6GW Helios Rack Range) EPYC Venice is reported to be in $15,000-$20,000. However large customers will likely to enjoy $10-$12k discount. I expect AMD to be able to ramp 7m EPYC Venice for entire 2026 and 3-4m of EPYC Verano(higher price than Venice). If we take an average selling price of $10,000 to be on the conservative side. Take down another 30% to be even more conservative on projection. I like to be conservative. That would be ~ 7m EPYC CPUs(Venice + Verano) for FY2027 or 583,000 units per month or 15,000 additional 2nm wafers per month which is completely reasonable for current TSMC Ramp, and I may be too conservative here. EPYC Verano and MI500 series will also be on 2nm. AI GPUs: 3GW x $18B= $54B EPYC CPUs: $10k x 7m CPUs= $70B = Data center revenue alone is $124B Other segments= probably in the $20-$25B FY 2027. FY2027 revenue = $124-$149B At 7m EPYC CPUs for entire 2027, that would be more than 50% market share when we comp it to availability from supply side, not from total Demand. It is possible that TSMC could significantly ramp even more capacity in 2027, so we will see. Metric Q1 2026 FY2027 Gross Margin 55-56% 60-62% Operating Margin 25-26% 32-35% Net Income Margin ~22% 26-30% FCF Margin 25% 28-30% At $124-$149B Revenue FY 2027 Net Income would be $32-$44B EPS would be $20-$27 (GAAP) Non-GAAP would be $25-$31 At $1,200 a share or $2T valuation that would be: 13.4-16x Price to Sales (P/S) 38-48 P/E At this kind of growth of AI SuperCycle, I think it is very reasonable valuation. If we use today at $406/share or $661B MC: 2027 P/S = 4.4x-5.3x 2027 P/E = 13x-16x Is AMD today expensive or cheap to you? Above is already a very conservative where I trimmed 20-30% of doable units. Meaning, there could be upside if TSMC is able to ramp meaningfully like they are planning. Conclusion: A $1,200 per share valuation IMO for AMD in FY2027 is not expensive at all; it is, in fact, conservative when viewed against the structural explosion in agentic AI demand we have mapped out. With server CPU TAM potentially scaling into the $100–$200B+ range in just CPU:GPU 1:1 Ratio for just 2026. AMD positioned to capture 50%+ share thanks to its 2nm TSMC allocation advantage and full-stack leadership, the company could realistically deliver $124–149B in total revenue and $25–$31+ non-GAAP EPS. At those levels, $1,200 implies a 2027 P/E = 13x-16x. Entirely reasonable for a company that will have become the clear Inference Queen (and in many workloads the preferred) AI infrastructure provider, with operating margins expanding above 30% and tens of billions in high-margin rack-scale AI revenue. Dr. Lisa Su was right presciently so about the Agentic AI inflection all the way back to her early 2022–2023 commentary on the coming shift from pure training to inference and orchestration-heavy workloads. While the broader market only fully woke up to this in 2026 when she doubled AMD’s long-term server CPU TAM forecast to >$120B by 2030 (with >35% CAGR), Dr. Su and her team have consistently positioned the company at the center of the CPU renaissance. The explosive demand we are seeing today, sold-out lines, rising ASPs, and hyperscalers forward-buying entire gigawatts of Helios-class systems is exactly the outcome she forecasted years ago. Not Financial Advice! DYOR!
13:03

$AMD is easily a $1,200 stock IMO| CPUs TAM 🧵 Not Financial Advice! DYOR! In this thread, I want to discuss the actual TAM for CPUs data center for just 2026, where many are giving different ranges, where I don't agree with. I will explain in detail why I disagree with these research firms and financial analysts using Math. And this thread should not be treated as Financial Advice. I'm just explaining my research and thought process so we can have a discussion. In 2024/2025, I gave out $620 PT for FY2026 was too conservative for AMD potential. At the time, It was early and many were just laughing, that PT was unrealistic and the AI world is run on GPUs only. Today, most of these folks are laughing with me. That is ok, I dont offer financial advice, and I do not need everyone to agree with me. I respect other opinions. If you enjoy this kind of thread, slap the like/repost/bookmark. If you want to support my work further and gain more in-depth analysis, consider subscribe! In early 2026, hyperscalers, enterprises, and OEMs are scrambling as Intel and AMD server CPUs are largely sold out for the year, with prices jumping 10–20% and lead times stretching from weeks to months (or longer for certain SKUs). What was once a GPU dominated story has flipped: the shift to explosive Agentic AI with its multi-step reasoning loops, tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, real-time data movement, and reinforcement learning, is dramatically tightening CPU:GPU ratios from the old training-era 1:4–8 all the way to 1:1 to 5:1 or even CPU-heavy configurations. CEOs across NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and public companies have been sounding the alarm on CNBC, Bloomberg, and earnings calls. CPUs are “cool again,” and in many agentic deployments they are becoming the new bottleneck alongside (or even ahead of) GPUs and custom ASICs. In 2025, roughly 12-15m AI GPUs + AI ASICs GPUs shipped, and is expect to be 15-20m units by 2026, where it suggesting Training demand is not going away. The actual TAM is structural, multiplicative demand that has already forced AMD to double its long-term server CPU TAM forecast to >$120 billion by 2030 (>35% CAGR), with Dr. Lisa Su noting Q2 2026 server CPU sales expected to surge 70%+ year-over-year and demand “far exceeding expectations.” At the same time, AMD’s secured 30–40% share of TSMC’s initial 2nm capacity (behind only Apple’s >50%) positions it to ramp Zen 6-based EPYC Venice exactly when this agentic wave hits hardest but even that aggressive five-fab 2nm expansion (with plans scaling toward 11 total advanced facilities) cannot instantly close the gap in the near-term. Supply constraints on wafers, advanced packaging, and power are compounding the squeeze, just as hyperscalers forward-buy and lock in long-term deals. 1. The actual potential TAM Various sources and institutions are giving $50-$160-$200B CPUs TAM toward 2030, and i disagree, where supply is severely behind vs Demand by at least 2-3 years or even longer by some estimates. The actual TAM will probably be 15-20m for FY2026. The typical average selling price from low to high end is $5,000 to $15,000, but due to rising memory, and different inflationary pressures on Semi, it would be more logical to think between $7,000-17,000. A. CPU:GPU Ratio at 1:1 A basic calucation at mid range =12,000 x 15-20m CPUs= $180-$240B TAM B. CPU:GPU Ratio at 5:1 = $12,000 x 75m-100m CPUs= $900B-$1.2T TAM Of course TSMC cannot even supply 20% of this massive inflection TAM in 2026. But do we think of Demand for TAM or Supply for TAM? Hence we are seeing massive 2nm Ramp from TSMC for $AMD. IMO, conservatively, I would take down 15-20% on 1:1 or $135-$192B TAM for just 2026. Im not even talking about 2030. We are just months into this, it is impossible to estimate Cagr atm, but this is 1-5 agents running tasks, I wrote a thread on 24/7 autonomous agents thread, where companies could use 50-250 agents to run tasks for them 24/7. It would require a different structural CPU:GPU to bring down the cost of token as well as handling the Orchestration bottleneck. GPUs would be useless and sit idle waiting for CPU due to highly CPU-intensive nature. The cost per Million tokens must come down more rapidly for this 50-250 autonomous agents to work, otherwise the token cost would be too enormous. Helios Rack is estimated to bring inference cost down to $0.0003-$0.0005/M tokens with 18 EPYC Venices along with 72 MI455x and other chips+ Components. A heavier or CPUs dense rack would bring down inference cost further. EPYC Verano(2027 gen 7 AI-optimized) is expected to drive inference costs meaningfully lower than the Venice baseline likely to the $0.00002–$0.00025 per million tokens range (or even sub-$0.00015 in highly optimized agentic/batch workloads). Verano have higher core counts than Venice, LPDDR5X SOCAMM2 memory support, more AI optimized and Next-Gen rack density & efficiency. 2. $AMD secured at least 30-40% of TSMC 2nm capacity and Memory from Samsung through 2028-2030. 2 2nm fabs are entering ramping phase toward 60-65k wafers per months and 5 dedicated 2nm fabs entering mass production/ramp in 2026. Will link sub threads below if you are interest for full detail. Apple is reported to secure 50%+ 2nm capacity for Iphone 18 and Mac chips and AMD secured at least 30-40% capacity while $NVDA $AVGO $ARM $AMZN $GOOGL and others are on 3nm. This broader aggressive ramp from TSMC to target up to 11 fabs is to address $AMD massive growth ahead. Where $ARM is facing massive CPUs supply constraints as they have to compete with other Mega Cap players on 3nm allocation. And $INTC is also facing supply constraints for data center CPUs and PC per management with lead times extrended to longer than 12 weeks. Dr. Su is aiming for higher than 50%+ Market share, and I believe it is achievable in 2026 or 2027 as AMD has the strongest CPUs offerings. Dr. Su did not want to take advantage of the shortage and she said during the Q1 earning call, AMD is prioritizing Units shipped while guiding margin to be inching 60%. If Jensen were in charge, I'm sure margin would be 70-75% in this kind of severe CPUs shortage condition. But that is not how Dr. Su operates for more than a decade. She wants most market share. So we will see it in revenue growth, but as TSMC ramps faster and faster, AMD Operating and FCF margin will massively improve vs prior decade. A significantly higher margin profile than before. 3. How I came up with $1,200 withint 12-18 months? At $1,200/ share, that would be around $2 Trillion MC. I expect FY2027 revenue to be $124-$144B where data center revenue dominates overall revenue. AI GPUs: I will stick to the lowest end so show u that I'm conservative at $18B for each GW vs $NVDA Rubin is $30B+ (most likely Helios Rack in the $20B+ due to memory price rising). We know deals with OpenAI and Meta are around 12GW and additional multi-customers at multi-GW scale were hinted and will be revealed as we get to July 22-23 2026 Advancing AI event. For now I will conservatively add a bit more to this model. (3-6GW Helios Rack Range) EPYC Venice is reported to be in $15,000-$20,000. However large customers will likely to enjoy $10-$12k discount. I expect AMD to be able to ramp 7m EPYC Venice for entire 2026 and 3-4m of EPYC Verano(higher price than Venice). If we take an average selling price of $10,000 to be on the conservative side. Take down another 30% to be even more conservative on projection. I like to be conservative. That would be ~ 7m EPYC CPUs(Venice + Verano) for FY2027 or 583,000 units per month or 15,000 additional 2nm wafers per month which is completely reasonable for current TSMC Ramp, and I may be too conservative here. EPYC Verano and MI500 series will also be on 2nm. AI GPUs: 3GW x $18B= $54B EPYC CPUs: $10k x 7m CPUs= $70B = Data center revenue alone is $124B Other segments= probably in the $20-$25B FY 2027. FY2027 revenue = $124-$149B At 7m EPYC CPUs for entire 2027, that would be more than 50% market share when we comp it to availability from supply side, not from total Demand. It is possible that TSMC could significantly ramp even more capacity in 2027, so we will see. Metric Q1 2026 FY2027 Gross Margin 55-56% 60-62% Operating Margin 25-26% 32-35% Net Income Margin ~22% 26-30% FCF Margin 25% 28-30% At $124-$149B Revenue FY 2027 Net Income would be $32-$44B EPS would be $20-$27 (GAAP) Non-GAAP would be $25-$31 At $1,200 a share or $2T valuation that would be: 13.4-16x Price to Sales (P/S) 38-48 P/E At this kind of growth of AI SuperCycle, I think it is very reasonable valuation. If we use today at $406/share or $661B MC: 2027 P/S = 4.4x-5.3x 2027 P/E = 13x-16x Is AMD today expensive or cheap to you? Above is already a very conservative where I trimmed 20-30% of doable units. Meaning, there could be upside if TSMC is able to ramp meaningfully like they are planning. Conclusion: A $1,200 per share valuation IMO for AMD in FY2027 is not expensive at all; it is, in fact, conservative when viewed against the structural explosion in agentic AI demand we have mapped out. With server CPU TAM potentially scaling into the $100–$200B+ range in just CPU:GPU 1:1 Ratio for just 2026. AMD positioned to capture 50%+ share thanks to its 2nm TSMC allocation advantage and full-stack leadership, the company could realistically deliver $124–149B in total revenue and $25–$31+ non-GAAP EPS. At those levels, $1,200 implies a 2027 P/E = 13x-16x. Entirely reasonable for a company that will have become the clear Inference Queen (and in many workloads the preferred) AI infrastructure provider, with operating margins expanding above 30% and tens of billions in high-margin rack-scale AI revenue. Dr. Lisa Su was right presciently so about the Agentic AI inflection all the way back to her early 2022–2023 commentary on the coming shift from pure training to inference and orchestration-heavy workloads. While the broader market only fully woke up to this in 2026 when she doubled AMD’s long-term server CPU TAM forecast to >$120B by 2030 (with >35% CAGR), Dr. Su and her team have consistently positioned the company at the center of the CPU renaissance. The explosive demand we are seeing today, sold-out lines, rising ASPs, and hyperscalers forward-buying entire gigawatts of Helios-class systems is exactly the outcome she forecasted years ago. Not Financial Advice! DYOR!

Mike

301,322 views • 3 months ago

As the new waive of interns come in, I want to wish everyone the best and to tell you to work as hard as you can and always feel so lucky to be at the greatest company in the world. Five years ago was the greatest day of my life, and today I still feel the exact same everyday. There are too many unbelievable memories from over the years, but this one always pops up on my favorites loop and every time I rewatch it I remember how beyond lucky and fulfilled that guy felt that day. Welcome to the Pirate Ship 🏴‍☠️ #Viva
0:25

As the new waive of interns come in, I want to wish everyone the best and to tell you to work as hard as you can and always feel so lucky to be at the greatest company in the world. Five years ago was the greatest day of my life, and today I still feel the exact same everyday. There are too many unbelievable memories from over the years, but this one always pops up on my favorites loop and every time I rewatch it I remember how beyond lucky and fulfilled that guy felt that day. Welcome to the Pirate Ship 🏴‍☠️ #Viva

Nick Fasoli

276,658 views • 2 months ago

AMD's Anush Elangovan explains why he thinks his company's open source ethos combined with agentic AI superpowers their leverage as a company: Because AMD publishes a lot of technical details about its hardware, when engineers use AI tools, the models already “understand” AMD’s systems and can help write code for them, debug them, or even generate new tools. And that makes developers more productive on AMD hardware without AMD having to do all the work internally. "AMD has had this ethos of open source, which really plays to our advantage. Every frontier model that I use has already seen every bit of AMD source code." "It'll rewrite my spec for me because it's already in the training data. Which you can't get from closed ecosystems." "In fact I built a virtual GPU simulator just based off our public specs, and now I'm running it on the GPU. So now I can run cross-generational GPU simulations on existing hardware." "We have that advantage. And we've run a Dev Day contest where we generated more tokens on AMD — Triton kernels and HIP kernels — than existed on the internet at the time." "So now that's all part of the pre-training data. It's a superpower because now you're open source, and you're agentically accelerating this process."
1:22

AMD's Anush Elangovan explains why he thinks his company's open source ethos combined with agentic AI superpowers their leverage as a company: Because AMD publishes a lot of technical details about its hardware, when engineers use AI tools, the models already “understand” AMD’s systems and can help write code for them, debug them, or even generate new tools. And that makes developers more productive on AMD hardware without AMD having to do all the work internally. "AMD has had this ethos of open source, which really plays to our advantage. Every frontier model that I use has already seen every bit of AMD source code." "It'll rewrite my spec for me because it's already in the training data. Which you can't get from closed ecosystems." "In fact I built a virtual GPU simulator just based off our public specs, and now I'm running it on the GPU. So now I can run cross-generational GPU simulations on existing hardware." "We have that advantage. And we've run a Dev Day contest where we generated more tokens on AMD — Triton kernels and HIP kernels — than existed on the internet at the time." "So now that's all part of the pre-training data. It's a superpower because now you're open source, and you're agentically accelerating this process."

TBPN

34,469 views • 3 months ago

"Stablecoins... are at about $300B circulating supply... and we think that's going to go to trillions over the next few years..." - Sid Powell 🥞 from Maple This is from a great interview Sid did last week that sort of went under the radar, as the interviewers don't have a presence on here as far as I can tell. It is from 'Global Money Talk' from 3PROTV, and had all sorts of bangers in it, so wanted to highlight a couple in a brief thread :) Will also link to full video below! Disclaimer: I own tons of $SYRUP and work with the team so am using the new Nikita tag on this just to be safe! :)
0:49

"Stablecoins... are at about $300B circulating supply... and we think that's going to go to trillions over the next few years..." - Sid Powell 🥞 from Maple This is from a great interview Sid did last week that sort of went under the radar, as the interviewers don't have a presence on here as far as I can tell. It is from 'Global Money Talk' from 3PROTV, and had all sorts of bangers in it, so wanted to highlight a couple in a brief thread :) Will also link to full video below! Disclaimer: I own tons of $SYRUP and work with the team so am using the new Nikita tag on this just to be safe! :)

rektdiomedes

14,880 views • 5 months ago

The evidence seems to be mounting. We all know you can trust FIFA as far as you can boot them. So questions are now coming. Is the World Cup fixed, are games being rigged, is the intention to make Messi golden boot winner and Argentina champions….are these decisions deliberate or is it just unconscious bias in favour of the big guns and gonna superstar players. He decisions in the Argentina comeback win against Egypt CAN be justified and explained. It’s much harder to explain why VAR didn’t even look at possible fouls in Argentinas goal. Much harder to explain how Messi didn’t even get a yellow let alone red earlier in the tournament, much harder to explain why some of the European teams are getting a yellow card for every 7,8 or 9 fouls the commit (England the must punished at 7) whilst Argentina is 22😳 They can commit 3x as many fouls before being punished. None of it passes the smell test…
5:56

The evidence seems to be mounting. We all know you can trust FIFA as far as you can boot them. So questions are now coming. Is the World Cup fixed, are games being rigged, is the intention to make Messi golden boot winner and Argentina champions….are these decisions deliberate or is it just unconscious bias in favour of the big guns and gonna superstar players. He decisions in the Argentina comeback win against Egypt CAN be justified and explained. It’s much harder to explain why VAR didn’t even look at possible fouls in Argentinas goal. Much harder to explain how Messi didn’t even get a yellow let alone red earlier in the tournament, much harder to explain why some of the European teams are getting a yellow card for every 7,8 or 9 fouls the commit (England the must punished at 7) whilst Argentina is 22😳 They can commit 3x as many fouls before being punished. None of it passes the smell test…

John Hannam

116,090 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇱 Antisemitism is now being labeled a “National Security Threat.” At the Hudson Institute’s event literally titled “Antisemitism as a National Security Threat,” Hoover Fellow Cole Bunzel openly warned that students he mentors at Stanford “will tell you that Nick Fuentes has popularity.” But once you label something a national security threat, the consequences are not academic: When the U.S. places an issue inside the national‑security box, it unlocks the entire counterterrorism apparatus: surveillance, intelligence collection, FBI task forces, DHS “extremism” units, tech‑platform enforcement, funding pipelines, and speech restrictions disguised as safety measures. It means: • FBI and DHS can treat speech, associations, or online communities as pre‑terror indicators, using counterterrorism authorities that bypass normal First Amendment constraints. • Tech companies can be quietly pushed to suppress or remove content under “harm‑based” national security frameworks. If “antisemitism” is defined through IHRA or similar standards, criticism of Israel can be swept into the dragnet. • Billions in federal grants can flow to NGOs, think tanks, and private actors to police public discourse. • Schools, universities, federal agencies, and workplaces can implement mandatory compliance systems, investigations, and reporting mechanisms. • For non‑citizens, the label can justify visa denials, deportations, and security screenings tied to political expression. • Because national security classifications are opaque and unreviewable, there is no public oversight, no transparency, and almost no way to challenge misuse. All it takes is a handful of Washington institutions, a few think‑tank panels, and a manufactured panic to define “antisemitism” so broadly that it effectively includes anti‑Zionism, criticism of a foreign state, or even unpopular political opinions held by college students. This is dangerous because once an issue enters the national‑security domain, it never comes back out.
1:00

🇺🇸🇮🇱 Antisemitism is now being labeled a “National Security Threat.” At the Hudson Institute’s event literally titled “Antisemitism as a National Security Threat,” Hoover Fellow Cole Bunzel openly warned that students he mentors at Stanford “will tell you that Nick Fuentes has popularity.” But once you label something a national security threat, the consequences are not academic: When the U.S. places an issue inside the national‑security box, it unlocks the entire counterterrorism apparatus: surveillance, intelligence collection, FBI task forces, DHS “extremism” units, tech‑platform enforcement, funding pipelines, and speech restrictions disguised as safety measures. It means: • FBI and DHS can treat speech, associations, or online communities as pre‑terror indicators, using counterterrorism authorities that bypass normal First Amendment constraints. • Tech companies can be quietly pushed to suppress or remove content under “harm‑based” national security frameworks. If “antisemitism” is defined through IHRA or similar standards, criticism of Israel can be swept into the dragnet. • Billions in federal grants can flow to NGOs, think tanks, and private actors to police public discourse. • Schools, universities, federal agencies, and workplaces can implement mandatory compliance systems, investigations, and reporting mechanisms. • For non‑citizens, the label can justify visa denials, deportations, and security screenings tied to political expression. • Because national security classifications are opaque and unreviewable, there is no public oversight, no transparency, and almost no way to challenge misuse. All it takes is a handful of Washington institutions, a few think‑tank panels, and a manufactured panic to define “antisemitism” so broadly that it effectively includes anti‑Zionism, criticism of a foreign state, or even unpopular political opinions held by college students. This is dangerous because once an issue enters the national‑security domain, it never comes back out.

DD Geopolitics

39,763 views • 8 months ago