Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

New Fit straight kiwi boys dick was red raw from edging for a solid hour and his cumshot was very explosive ☄️ #gloryhole #gayglorygole #gloryholes #seatedgloryhole #gaybj #gayoral #kiwicock #hugcumshot #hardcock #shootingropes #edgingcock #edged #cumblast #hj 𝘼𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙚 𝙈𝙚𝙣 𝙀𝙭𝙝𝙞𝙗𝙞𝙩 🇦🇺 Free OF

aussiegloryhole's profile picture

Seated Glory Hole 190K TOP 1% on Onlyfans

190,429 subscribers

187,884 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#gloryhole#gayglorygole#gloryholes#seatedgloryhole#gaybj#gayoral#kiwicock#hugcumshot#hardcock#shootingropes#edgingcock#edged#cumblast#hj
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A message from Nicko: Hello Boys and Girls, I hope this message finds you all well! The reason I'm writing to you all today is to let you know of a very serious health problem that I have been through. In January I had a stroke, thank the Lord it was a minor one referred to as a TIA. It left me paralyzed on my right side from my shoulder on down, of course I was very worried that my career was over but with the love and support from my wife, Rebecca and family, my doctors, especially Julie my OT (Occupational Therapist), and my Maiden family I was able to bounce back to somewhere near 70% recovered. After 10 weeks of intense therapy it was almost time to start rehearsals for our tour. I feel it's important to let you know about this now instead of earlier as I was mainly concerned with doing my job and concentrating on getting back to 100% fitness. I'm not there yet but by the grace of God I'm getting better and stronger as the weeks go by. Thank you all for a most wonderful and magical tour so far, you have all been so amazing. Well that's it from me. God bless you all, stay safe and well and I look forward to seeing you all somewhere in time. 🙂🙂 Nicko Manager Rod Smallwood adds - “The rest of the band and l think that what Nicko has been able to achieve since his stroke shows incredible belief and willpower and we are all very proud of him. With this new and musically very complex set to learn ahead of him, he just got his head down and concentrated on recovery. We honestly did not know if he would be able to play a whole show until band rehearsals started in May and there was just so much support for him from the band and then genuine relief for all when we saw he was going to be able to do it!” "Nicko being Nicko he did not want to make a fuss and cause any distraction to the tour at the time but, now that he is sure he will soon get there, he thought you fans should know straight from him rather than by any rumours!" "We are all of course delighted he battled through this so well and look forward to many more tours together starting with the three Western Canada shows and Power Trip in California coming up in a couple of months time. We can’t wait! This tour is that good!” #IronMaiden #NickoMcBrain #TheFuturePastTour
1:18

A message from Nicko: Hello Boys and Girls, I hope this message finds you all well! The reason I'm writing to you all today is to let you know of a very serious health problem that I have been through. In January I had a stroke, thank the Lord it was a minor one referred to as a TIA. It left me paralyzed on my right side from my shoulder on down, of course I was very worried that my career was over but with the love and support from my wife, Rebecca and family, my doctors, especially Julie my OT (Occupational Therapist), and my Maiden family I was able to bounce back to somewhere near 70% recovered. After 10 weeks of intense therapy it was almost time to start rehearsals for our tour. I feel it's important to let you know about this now instead of earlier as I was mainly concerned with doing my job and concentrating on getting back to 100% fitness. I'm not there yet but by the grace of God I'm getting better and stronger as the weeks go by. Thank you all for a most wonderful and magical tour so far, you have all been so amazing. Well that's it from me. God bless you all, stay safe and well and I look forward to seeing you all somewhere in time. 🙂🙂 Nicko Manager Rod Smallwood adds - “The rest of the band and l think that what Nicko has been able to achieve since his stroke shows incredible belief and willpower and we are all very proud of him. With this new and musically very complex set to learn ahead of him, he just got his head down and concentrated on recovery. We honestly did not know if he would be able to play a whole show until band rehearsals started in May and there was just so much support for him from the band and then genuine relief for all when we saw he was going to be able to do it!” "Nicko being Nicko he did not want to make a fuss and cause any distraction to the tour at the time but, now that he is sure he will soon get there, he thought you fans should know straight from him rather than by any rumours!" "We are all of course delighted he battled through this so well and look forward to many more tours together starting with the three Western Canada shows and Power Trip in California coming up in a couple of months time. We can’t wait! This tour is that good!” #IronMaiden #NickoMcBrain #TheFuturePastTour

Iron Maiden

1,557,007 次观看 • 3 年前

HOW BOWIE WAVED BYE BYE TO THE 70S ON SNL “And now he is a puppet dancer...” Last month Rolling Stone voted David Bowie’s 1979 appearance on Saturday Night Live, #1 of The 50 Best ‘Saturday Night Live’ Musical Performances. And deservedly so. It was forty-five years ago today that a whole new persuasion of young Americans was converted to the cause by that very broadcast. For it was on 15th December 1979 that the live broadcast in New York had a similarly persuasive effect on a receptive group of US youngsters as Starman on TOTPs in 1972 and the BBC’s Cracked Actor documentary had on UK teenagers in 1975. Of course, the TV-viewing youth of America looking for something new had already had their hearts and minds captured by broadcasts of both The 1980 Floor Show and The Ziggy Stardust Motion Picture more than half a decade earlier, but the SNL appearance helped to cast the net further. Bowie performed The Man Who Sold The World, TVC 15 and Boys Keep Swinging, with Klaus Nomi, Joey Arias and a toy pink poodle/TV monitor all making extraordinary guest appearances. The show was hosted by actor Martin Sheen. For The Man Who Sold The World Bowie was lifted and positioned in front of the microphone by Klaus and Joey in a costume designed by Mark Ravitz and Bowie, inspired by Sonia Delaunay’s designs for Tristan Tzara’s 1923 play Le Cœur à gaz (The Gas Heart). The skirt suit that David wore for TVC 15 was designed by Brooks Van Horn costume house, New York. The song also showcased aforementioned pink TV poodle. For Boys Keep Swinging DB operated a puppet while utilising green-screen technology to hilarious effect. In an absurd move the show’s producers blanked the line “Other boys check you out” but seemingly missed the puppet’s obvious excitement at the climax of the song. Words cannot do Bowie’s SNL appearance justice, suffice to say, it remains among the most surreal television performances broadcast anywhere, ever. If you've never seen this piece of TV history, prepare to be captivated by all three songs courtesy of a full From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free remaster here: While you’re there, read his own notes regarding the broadcast and associated credits. #BowieSaturdayNigthLive #BowieSNL #Bowie1979 #NachoBowie
1:00

HOW BOWIE WAVED BYE BYE TO THE 70S ON SNL “And now he is a puppet dancer...” Last month Rolling Stone voted David Bowie’s 1979 appearance on Saturday Night Live, #1 of The 50 Best ‘Saturday Night Live’ Musical Performances. And deservedly so. It was forty-five years ago today that a whole new persuasion of young Americans was converted to the cause by that very broadcast. For it was on 15th December 1979 that the live broadcast in New York had a similarly persuasive effect on a receptive group of US youngsters as Starman on TOTPs in 1972 and the BBC’s Cracked Actor documentary had on UK teenagers in 1975. Of course, the TV-viewing youth of America looking for something new had already had their hearts and minds captured by broadcasts of both The 1980 Floor Show and The Ziggy Stardust Motion Picture more than half a decade earlier, but the SNL appearance helped to cast the net further. Bowie performed The Man Who Sold The World, TVC 15 and Boys Keep Swinging, with Klaus Nomi, Joey Arias and a toy pink poodle/TV monitor all making extraordinary guest appearances. The show was hosted by actor Martin Sheen. For The Man Who Sold The World Bowie was lifted and positioned in front of the microphone by Klaus and Joey in a costume designed by Mark Ravitz and Bowie, inspired by Sonia Delaunay’s designs for Tristan Tzara’s 1923 play Le Cœur à gaz (The Gas Heart). The skirt suit that David wore for TVC 15 was designed by Brooks Van Horn costume house, New York. The song also showcased aforementioned pink TV poodle. For Boys Keep Swinging DB operated a puppet while utilising green-screen technology to hilarious effect. In an absurd move the show’s producers blanked the line “Other boys check you out” but seemingly missed the puppet’s obvious excitement at the climax of the song. Words cannot do Bowie’s SNL appearance justice, suffice to say, it remains among the most surreal television performances broadcast anywhere, ever. If you've never seen this piece of TV history, prepare to be captivated by all three songs courtesy of a full From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free remaster here: While you’re there, read his own notes regarding the broadcast and associated credits. #BowieSaturdayNigthLive #BowieSNL #Bowie1979 #NachoBowie

David Bowie Official

132,391 次观看 • 1 年前

This is an absolutely exceptional historical testimony on the Bush administration's conduct towards China which, I think, is disclosed for the very first time. The man interviewed is is Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Colin Powell when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Bush's Secretary of State. He described how during the Bush administration, there was a major internal fight between hawks (Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney) who wanted to provoke China into a war with respect to Taiwan and those who wanted to keep the peace (Colin Powell and Richard Hass, assisted by Bush himself). For instance he describes how "when Chen Shui-bian was threatening to hold an independence referendum in Taiwan" he together with Powell and Haas were telling Wang Yi "don't listen to Chen Shui-bian because he is not going to be allowed to do that, we will prevent him from doing that." Meanwhile "Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were sending an emissary to Taipei, almost weekly, to tell Chen Shui-bian to keep on, to keep doing it. They wanted to cross that red line which they knew was a red line China would honor..." This situation was ultimately resolved when Bush got informed and decided to publicly rebuke Chen Shui-bian. He said the situation was such that "we had to fight to the nail against the Vice-President and the Secretary of Defense from developing a new cold war with China. That's what they wanted, they wanted a new cold war with China. They both saw that cold wars were very advantageous for the U.S., the defense complex and everything else, from where Cheney came... Powell spent his entire four years - the principal purpose - was keeping us out of war with China, because of what the Vice-President and the Secretary of Defense did." His conclusion: "That was how crazy that administration was. They're trying to do all these things [in the Middle-East] and at the same time they're baiting China. It's insanity, I don't know a better word for it, it's insanity. The hubris of power produced an incredible amount of insanity." The obvious two lessons here are: 1) Taiwan absolutely is a pawn the U.S. uses to provoke China, I don't think there can be any doubt when you listen this testimony... At the end of the day, they'll do - especially the DPP (Chen Shui-bian's party and that of today's president Tsai Ing-wen) - whatever the prevailing mood in the U.S. is. 2) Thankfully the more rational spirits prevailed here but it was obviously a close call, we can easily imagine a similarly insane U.S. administration without anyone to keep the insanity in check. And this would result in a war that'd have enormous ramifications for every single human being on the planet.
4:06

This is an absolutely exceptional historical testimony on the Bush administration's conduct towards China which, I think, is disclosed for the very first time. The man interviewed is is Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Colin Powell when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Bush's Secretary of State. He described how during the Bush administration, there was a major internal fight between hawks (Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney) who wanted to provoke China into a war with respect to Taiwan and those who wanted to keep the peace (Colin Powell and Richard Hass, assisted by Bush himself). For instance he describes how "when Chen Shui-bian was threatening to hold an independence referendum in Taiwan" he together with Powell and Haas were telling Wang Yi "don't listen to Chen Shui-bian because he is not going to be allowed to do that, we will prevent him from doing that." Meanwhile "Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were sending an emissary to Taipei, almost weekly, to tell Chen Shui-bian to keep on, to keep doing it. They wanted to cross that red line which they knew was a red line China would honor..." This situation was ultimately resolved when Bush got informed and decided to publicly rebuke Chen Shui-bian. He said the situation was such that "we had to fight to the nail against the Vice-President and the Secretary of Defense from developing a new cold war with China. That's what they wanted, they wanted a new cold war with China. They both saw that cold wars were very advantageous for the U.S., the defense complex and everything else, from where Cheney came... Powell spent his entire four years - the principal purpose - was keeping us out of war with China, because of what the Vice-President and the Secretary of Defense did." His conclusion: "That was how crazy that administration was. They're trying to do all these things [in the Middle-East] and at the same time they're baiting China. It's insanity, I don't know a better word for it, it's insanity. The hubris of power produced an incredible amount of insanity." The obvious two lessons here are: 1) Taiwan absolutely is a pawn the U.S. uses to provoke China, I don't think there can be any doubt when you listen this testimony... At the end of the day, they'll do - especially the DPP (Chen Shui-bian's party and that of today's president Tsai Ing-wen) - whatever the prevailing mood in the U.S. is. 2) Thankfully the more rational spirits prevailed here but it was obviously a close call, we can easily imagine a similarly insane U.S. administration without anyone to keep the insanity in check. And this would result in a war that'd have enormous ramifications for every single human being on the planet.

Arnaud Bertrand

679,502 次观看 • 2 年前

A rare glimpse at the territorial nature of wolf packs. Instances like this probably happen regularly as wolves aim to maintain/expand their territory and eliminate neighboring wolves (i.e., competitors for resources). These snippets show the breeding pair of the Windsong Pack venturing out of their territory to chase the breeding male of the neighboring pack (the Blood Moon Pack). If the Windsong Pack had caught up to this wolf, they would have undoubtedly killed him. But they didn’t. The chase did not last very long—a handful of minutes with a straight-line distance of just under a mile. The first clips of the chase were from a camera on the edge of a beaver dam. The breeding male of the neighboring pack (Wolf Y1T) crossed the dam and clearly knew he was being followed. A minute later, the Windsong Pack passed by in pursuit. The next clips were captured about 4 minutes later on a second camera just under a mile to the north of the first one. On this second camera, Wolf Y1T was running full speed. However, the Windsong Pack while in pursuit, appeared to be slowing down. A minute later, the Windsong pair walks back past this camera…the chase had ended. About an hour after that, the Windsong Pack crossed the beaver dam that the first camera was on in their return trip to their territory. Interestingly, about 2 months after this video was captured, Wolf Y1T’s mate was killed by the neighboring pack to the south (Biondich Pack). Since the pack was only two wolves (Y1T and his mate), this event left Y1T by himself and the status of the Blood Moon Pack up in the air. However, within a few weeks, Y1T found another mate and through some series of events, Y1T and his new mate booted the Windsong pair (i.e., the wolves in this video pursuing Y1T) from their territory this past summer, and took it over. As such, Y1T and his mate (the Blood Moon Pack) currently occupy the Windsong Pack territory.
0:36

A rare glimpse at the territorial nature of wolf packs. Instances like this probably happen regularly as wolves aim to maintain/expand their territory and eliminate neighboring wolves (i.e., competitors for resources). These snippets show the breeding pair of the Windsong Pack venturing out of their territory to chase the breeding male of the neighboring pack (the Blood Moon Pack). If the Windsong Pack had caught up to this wolf, they would have undoubtedly killed him. But they didn’t. The chase did not last very long—a handful of minutes with a straight-line distance of just under a mile. The first clips of the chase were from a camera on the edge of a beaver dam. The breeding male of the neighboring pack (Wolf Y1T) crossed the dam and clearly knew he was being followed. A minute later, the Windsong Pack passed by in pursuit. The next clips were captured about 4 minutes later on a second camera just under a mile to the north of the first one. On this second camera, Wolf Y1T was running full speed. However, the Windsong Pack while in pursuit, appeared to be slowing down. A minute later, the Windsong pair walks back past this camera…the chase had ended. About an hour after that, the Windsong Pack crossed the beaver dam that the first camera was on in their return trip to their territory. Interestingly, about 2 months after this video was captured, Wolf Y1T’s mate was killed by the neighboring pack to the south (Biondich Pack). Since the pack was only two wolves (Y1T and his mate), this event left Y1T by himself and the status of the Blood Moon Pack up in the air. However, within a few weeks, Y1T found another mate and through some series of events, Y1T and his new mate booted the Windsong pair (i.e., the wolves in this video pursuing Y1T) from their territory this past summer, and took it over. As such, Y1T and his mate (the Blood Moon Pack) currently occupy the Windsong Pack territory.

Voyageurs Wolf Project

16,487 次观看 • 5 个月前

In 2009, we tried to throw our very first DatPiff Live concert at the Masonic Temple in Brooklyn. On paper, it looked solid. Styles P, Red Café, JR Writer. In reality? Total disaster. We had no idea how to properly market a show or handle the logistics that come with running one. On top of that, the venue was way out of the mix. It was the perfect storm for things to go wrong, and they did. But we learned. In 2010, we ran it back. This time at SOB’s in SoHo, arguably the hottest, most intimate venue in NYC at the time. The approach was different. Instead of stacking the bill with just popular New York names, we built the lineup around artists whose mixtapes we had recently released. XV was the headliner. He was buzzing heavy, and we were dropping his new mixtape at midnight that same night, so the synergy made perfect sense. The supporting cast was strong too: Cory Gunz, Los, Masspike Miles, DJ Woogie, DJ Killatouch. And then there was Mac Miller. K.I.D.S. had dropped about a month earlier. Mac had never performed in New York City before. We knew he was hot online, but we had no idea what that would translate to in real life. We didn’t know how many fans would show up for him. Big mistake. That night quickly became a Mac Miller show first, DatPiff Live second. I’m not exaggerating when I say 90% of the crowd was there for him. He went on third to last, and the second he touched that stage, the place exploded. The room was shaking. He did a 30-minute set, and if I could go back, I would’ve given him an hour to run the entire mixtape front to back. He absolutely bodied it. I remember looking around at everyone backstage, we were all in shock. Like, “what just happened?” His manager at the time, Artie Pitt from Rostrum, great dude, was in tears after the set. He looked at me and said, “I’m just so proud of him, man. He made it. This just solidified what I already knew, the kid’s a star.” He was right. None of us could’ve predicted just how far Mac would go, but in that moment, we all knew something had shifted. He had arrived. As for the rest of the night… after Mac’s set, about half the crowd left. Masspike Miles went on to a nearly empty floor. The remaining fans were holding out for XV, who closed the show to about 40–50% capacity. To his credit, he still delivered a great performance, finishing right around midnight as his mixtape officially dropped. The next day, the blogs and media coverage labeled it “Mac Miller’s show at SOB’s.” DatPiff barely got mentioned. The other artists barely got mentioned. And honestly? Rightfully so. Deep down, we all knew that was the night. The night Mac Miller went from a buzzing mixtape kid out of Pittsburgh to a future global touring superstar. It’s a night I’ll never forget. And I guarantee anyone who was in that building won’t either. If you were there, drop a comment 🙌 #macmiller
12:56

In 2009, we tried to throw our very first DatPiff Live concert at the Masonic Temple in Brooklyn. On paper, it looked solid. Styles P, Red Café, JR Writer. In reality? Total disaster. We had no idea how to properly market a show or handle the logistics that come with running one. On top of that, the venue was way out of the mix. It was the perfect storm for things to go wrong, and they did. But we learned. In 2010, we ran it back. This time at SOB’s in SoHo, arguably the hottest, most intimate venue in NYC at the time. The approach was different. Instead of stacking the bill with just popular New York names, we built the lineup around artists whose mixtapes we had recently released. XV was the headliner. He was buzzing heavy, and we were dropping his new mixtape at midnight that same night, so the synergy made perfect sense. The supporting cast was strong too: Cory Gunz, Los, Masspike Miles, DJ Woogie, DJ Killatouch. And then there was Mac Miller. K.I.D.S. had dropped about a month earlier. Mac had never performed in New York City before. We knew he was hot online, but we had no idea what that would translate to in real life. We didn’t know how many fans would show up for him. Big mistake. That night quickly became a Mac Miller show first, DatPiff Live second. I’m not exaggerating when I say 90% of the crowd was there for him. He went on third to last, and the second he touched that stage, the place exploded. The room was shaking. He did a 30-minute set, and if I could go back, I would’ve given him an hour to run the entire mixtape front to back. He absolutely bodied it. I remember looking around at everyone backstage, we were all in shock. Like, “what just happened?” His manager at the time, Artie Pitt from Rostrum, great dude, was in tears after the set. He looked at me and said, “I’m just so proud of him, man. He made it. This just solidified what I already knew, the kid’s a star.” He was right. None of us could’ve predicted just how far Mac would go, but in that moment, we all knew something had shifted. He had arrived. As for the rest of the night… after Mac’s set, about half the crowd left. Masspike Miles went on to a nearly empty floor. The remaining fans were holding out for XV, who closed the show to about 40–50% capacity. To his credit, he still delivered a great performance, finishing right around midnight as his mixtape officially dropped. The next day, the blogs and media coverage labeled it “Mac Miller’s show at SOB’s.” DatPiff barely got mentioned. The other artists barely got mentioned. And honestly? Rightfully so. Deep down, we all knew that was the night. The night Mac Miller went from a buzzing mixtape kid out of Pittsburgh to a future global touring superstar. It’s a night I’ll never forget. And I guarantee anyone who was in that building won’t either. If you were there, drop a comment 🙌 #macmiller

DatPiff

87,649 次观看 • 5 个月前

Fight AND practice highlights of that 49ers-Titans joint session.... 🏈 Brock Purdy was dominant facing a familiar Robert Saleh defense. 13 has been locked in all camp. Especially good in the red zone, where he found Deebo for multiple TDs and again connected with Luke Farrell (growing theme) 🏈Bullying vibe, especially early, from the 49ers defense. Tennessee took exception, hence the fights. A first-play Upton Stout shove and a second-play Dre Greenlaw/Fred Warner TFL on a pitch right set a very physical tone. Then, after Renardo Green leveled Carnell Tate, matters exploded 🏈Two Titans' O-linemen eventually ejected. Skirmish activity extended into back half of practice after 49ers DT Osa Odighizuwa sacked Cam Ward and grabbed his shoulder pad. Tennessee didn't like that 🏈Titans seemed to have some rushing success vs 49ers, though it's very hard to gauge without watching the tape. Ward's accuracy was very inconsistent. Lowlight for him was Ji'Ayir Brown's pick 6, which followed the Osa vs. Dan Moore Jr. Round II 🏈Big picture on 49ers offense: They'll need to be a top-5 unit this year, and Purdy has given every indication that he can guide that type of success from his QB spot. Layered passes, scrambles, elite RZ production... all there 🏈49ers vet DB Nate Hobbs was very active and physical for the 49ers today... seemed to be at the center of much of the action 🏈49ers safety Marques Sigle notched a couple PBUs 🏈Second-year corner Jakob Robinson logged a leaping INT against Titans QB Will Levis. It was intended for WR Mason Kinsev, who seemed to be doing a lot of today's jawing — including one session vs 49ers rookie safety Jalen Stroman 🏈I found Levis throwing a pick with Levi's Stadium in the background was funny 🏈One good red-zone rep for the 49ers involved rookie LBs Jaden Dugger and Larry Worth — nearly 14 feet of combined wingspan between them — flush Levis out of the pocket and force an incompletion. Was an imposing sight; Worth was FIRED UP 🏈Romello Height had some good, explosive work against Moore — a starting LT — that disrupted Ward. A lot of emotion in this one; Height was fired up on the sideline. Offsides flags still a concern 🏈Warner is a strategic instigator — talked quite a bit in Ward's direction in between series🍿. Also a good face-to-face confrontation with the much shorter RB Tyjae Spears 🏈Raheem Morris blitzed Warner numerous times today. The most I can remember Warner being asked to go straight after the QB. Another data point in evaluating this evolving 49ers' defense 🏈Former Stanford WR Elic Ayomanor had some good battles vs 49ers CBs Renardo Green (great coverage on a deep ball) and Jack Jones. Ayomanor beat Jones on a double move but Jones recovered for a last-second PBU 🏈Next up: Preseason opener vs these same Titans. Robert Saleh said Tennessee will play everyone and Kyle Shanahan said the 49ers will sit most starters. All in all, coaches happy with the productive work today. Good eval opportunity for the 49ers coming up in an actual game environment...
0:22

Fight AND practice highlights of that 49ers-Titans joint session.... 🏈 Brock Purdy was dominant facing a familiar Robert Saleh defense. 13 has been locked in all camp. Especially good in the red zone, where he found Deebo for multiple TDs and again connected with Luke Farrell (growing theme) 🏈Bullying vibe, especially early, from the 49ers defense. Tennessee took exception, hence the fights. A first-play Upton Stout shove and a second-play Dre Greenlaw/Fred Warner TFL on a pitch right set a very physical tone. Then, after Renardo Green leveled Carnell Tate, matters exploded 🏈Two Titans' O-linemen eventually ejected. Skirmish activity extended into back half of practice after 49ers DT Osa Odighizuwa sacked Cam Ward and grabbed his shoulder pad. Tennessee didn't like that 🏈Titans seemed to have some rushing success vs 49ers, though it's very hard to gauge without watching the tape. Ward's accuracy was very inconsistent. Lowlight for him was Ji'Ayir Brown's pick 6, which followed the Osa vs. Dan Moore Jr. Round II 🏈Big picture on 49ers offense: They'll need to be a top-5 unit this year, and Purdy has given every indication that he can guide that type of success from his QB spot. Layered passes, scrambles, elite RZ production... all there 🏈49ers vet DB Nate Hobbs was very active and physical for the 49ers today... seemed to be at the center of much of the action 🏈49ers safety Marques Sigle notched a couple PBUs 🏈Second-year corner Jakob Robinson logged a leaping INT against Titans QB Will Levis. It was intended for WR Mason Kinsev, who seemed to be doing a lot of today's jawing — including one session vs 49ers rookie safety Jalen Stroman 🏈I found Levis throwing a pick with Levi's Stadium in the background was funny 🏈One good red-zone rep for the 49ers involved rookie LBs Jaden Dugger and Larry Worth — nearly 14 feet of combined wingspan between them — flush Levis out of the pocket and force an incompletion. Was an imposing sight; Worth was FIRED UP 🏈Romello Height had some good, explosive work against Moore — a starting LT — that disrupted Ward. A lot of emotion in this one; Height was fired up on the sideline. Offsides flags still a concern 🏈Warner is a strategic instigator — talked quite a bit in Ward's direction in between series🍿. Also a good face-to-face confrontation with the much shorter RB Tyjae Spears 🏈Raheem Morris blitzed Warner numerous times today. The most I can remember Warner being asked to go straight after the QB. Another data point in evaluating this evolving 49ers' defense 🏈Former Stanford WR Elic Ayomanor had some good battles vs 49ers CBs Renardo Green (great coverage on a deep ball) and Jack Jones. Ayomanor beat Jones on a double move but Jones recovered for a last-second PBU 🏈Next up: Preseason opener vs these same Titans. Robert Saleh said Tennessee will play everyone and Kyle Shanahan said the 49ers will sit most starters. All in all, coaches happy with the productive work today. Good eval opportunity for the 49ers coming up in an actual game environment...

David Lombardi

74,624 次观看 • 2 天前

Today, in Melbourne, Brad Battin was rolled for Jess Wilson. It happened swiftly and without warning. Like thieves in the night they rolled in, and by morning, Brad was rolled out. Why? Surely there must be a reason. Maybe it was because he is a man. A mature man, with 50 years of life experience. Maybe it was because he had held a number of real jobs. Maybe it is because he served the state as a police officer. Maybe it is because he had owned and run a business. Maybe because he never was a staffer. Maybe it was because he didn’t come from Liberal royalty in Kooyong. Maybe it was because he was opening doors in new areas, places that had not considered voting Liberal before. Or maybe it was because he didn’t go to the right schools or move in the proper circles… Maybe. It could be because he was effective as an opposition leader. He was indeed shifting the polls and government policy - particularly on the youth crime epidemic plaguing Melbourne. It could even be because he was against “the Voice”, like most of the rest of his state. Maybe because he was against the treaty, that has put the property rights of all Victorians under a cloud. It is possible it was because he is against 100% renewables. Maybe he just wasn’t doing as he was told by the backroom boys - the lobbyists, the hacks and the spivs. It might even be because he knows what a woman is. Possibly some of those things… probably all of them. Because from out here, it looks like Jess Wilson is the solution to all of those ‘problems’. Just another young, inexperienced, former staffer. Just another progressive lady, who will solve the woman problem in the Liberal party, by helping the rest of us define it. Whatever the reason, I am sure the Liberals have just stolen defeat from the jaws of Victory as the inner-city elites that run the show shake their million dollar watches, fists clenched at the voters choosing Teal. As the former Liberal strongholds leave the blue team in their droves, in pursuit of a better brand of champagne socialism, they plant a foot squarely on the throats of the socially conservative and economically aspirational. The Liberals, desperate to chase back what they have lost, install Wilson in a pathetic last-ditch effort to woo them back. Demonstrating they too are happy to put the boot into those less progressive and more aspirational. People that just want to buy a home, pay the power bill, and maybe just run their homes in peace. Labor ran away from them long ago, as they pursued the same anti-Australian, anti-aspirational policies that please the Liberal lobbyists, Teal voters, Green voters, Unions and the Liberal backroom boys. The choice has never been less clear. Go with the progressive socialist that you know, or the progressive socialist that pretends to understand the economy better. The red or the blue, it’s up to you. Or maybe this is the election where the Liberals in Victoria go the way of SA, and WA, as they get packed into a minivan and sent away. One thing is for sure, the minor party and independent vote at the Victorian election will be record breaking, because the major parties are completely absorbed in their own brilliance. Completely wrapped up in themselves, holed up in their lavish offices as the groaning public feel the pain of decades of neglect. I would urge Brad Battin to hold his head up. His treatment by the corrupt and out of touch Victorian Liberal Party is a badge of honour. They are like the robbers he spent much of his career trying to catch. Like thieves in the night they shall slink off into the thickness of the dark. What happened to him today was very ‘modern’ Liberal, but hardly very Australian. I just want Australia back.
1:46

Today, in Melbourne, Brad Battin was rolled for Jess Wilson. It happened swiftly and without warning. Like thieves in the night they rolled in, and by morning, Brad was rolled out. Why? Surely there must be a reason. Maybe it was because he is a man. A mature man, with 50 years of life experience. Maybe it was because he had held a number of real jobs. Maybe it is because he served the state as a police officer. Maybe it is because he had owned and run a business. Maybe because he never was a staffer. Maybe it was because he didn’t come from Liberal royalty in Kooyong. Maybe it was because he was opening doors in new areas, places that had not considered voting Liberal before. Or maybe it was because he didn’t go to the right schools or move in the proper circles… Maybe. It could be because he was effective as an opposition leader. He was indeed shifting the polls and government policy - particularly on the youth crime epidemic plaguing Melbourne. It could even be because he was against “the Voice”, like most of the rest of his state. Maybe because he was against the treaty, that has put the property rights of all Victorians under a cloud. It is possible it was because he is against 100% renewables. Maybe he just wasn’t doing as he was told by the backroom boys - the lobbyists, the hacks and the spivs. It might even be because he knows what a woman is. Possibly some of those things… probably all of them. Because from out here, it looks like Jess Wilson is the solution to all of those ‘problems’. Just another young, inexperienced, former staffer. Just another progressive lady, who will solve the woman problem in the Liberal party, by helping the rest of us define it. Whatever the reason, I am sure the Liberals have just stolen defeat from the jaws of Victory as the inner-city elites that run the show shake their million dollar watches, fists clenched at the voters choosing Teal. As the former Liberal strongholds leave the blue team in their droves, in pursuit of a better brand of champagne socialism, they plant a foot squarely on the throats of the socially conservative and economically aspirational. The Liberals, desperate to chase back what they have lost, install Wilson in a pathetic last-ditch effort to woo them back. Demonstrating they too are happy to put the boot into those less progressive and more aspirational. People that just want to buy a home, pay the power bill, and maybe just run their homes in peace. Labor ran away from them long ago, as they pursued the same anti-Australian, anti-aspirational policies that please the Liberal lobbyists, Teal voters, Green voters, Unions and the Liberal backroom boys. The choice has never been less clear. Go with the progressive socialist that you know, or the progressive socialist that pretends to understand the economy better. The red or the blue, it’s up to you. Or maybe this is the election where the Liberals in Victoria go the way of SA, and WA, as they get packed into a minivan and sent away. One thing is for sure, the minor party and independent vote at the Victorian election will be record breaking, because the major parties are completely absorbed in their own brilliance. Completely wrapped up in themselves, holed up in their lavish offices as the groaning public feel the pain of decades of neglect. I would urge Brad Battin to hold his head up. His treatment by the corrupt and out of touch Victorian Liberal Party is a badge of honour. They are like the robbers he spent much of his career trying to catch. Like thieves in the night they shall slink off into the thickness of the dark. What happened to him today was very ‘modern’ Liberal, but hardly very Australian. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

89,051 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Candace Reads An EXPLOSIVE "Open Letter" to Erika Kirk LIVE on Podcast — Exposing Years of Lies, Betrayal, & the FULL PUZZLE Behind Charlie Kirk's Assassination! 😱🧩 Candace lays it ALL out publicly: • She & Charlie were like brother & sister until he lied to her face about a secret Mar-a-Lago meeting with Ike Perlmutter — the moment her trust shattered. • Post-Kanye, new influences (Stacy Sheridan, Tyler, Shane for security, Dan Floyd) hijacked Charlie’s ambition with “wrong money.” Candace warned him… he didn’t listen. • Erika arrived at the same time and lied straight to Candace’s face during a 4-hour hotel talk. Candace says every cruel attack on her (calling her antisemitic, claiming no contact since 2019) was done with Erika’s full blessing and funding. • Charlie predicted his own death in chilling detail on his phone (Candace has the texts). He told Erika his “adrenal glands were going off,” couldn’t sleep, had visions — classic signs he knew danger was coming. • Morning of Sept 10: Erika sent excited Charlie to sleep in their daughter’s room “for a good night’s sleep”… then the wedding band was mysteriously off. Candace flags the inconsistencies in Erika’s Jesse Watters interview. • THE BIG ONE: Verifiable proof that Erika & Justin Strife lied about “Pierre.” Pierre (French-born, Pierre Falcone of Angolagate fame) had a BILLIONS (not millions) deal on the table with TPUSA. He called Justin Strife & Don Orico IMMEDIATELY after the shooting. He knew Charlie was dead BEFORE the world — before Erika — and he wasn’t even a donor yet. • French-Israeli-Egyptian angle? Bibi Netanyahu personally offered to “take TPUSA to the next level” in the Hamptons (Erika was there) — Charlie said NO and refused Bibi on his podcast. Candace connects it to trafficking networks and why Pierre knew first. • Erika’s alibi on the morning of the murder? Candace has proof it’s been edited/changed. Egyptian planes, tarmac wait times, who was on which plane — the story doesn’t add up. Candace ends with fire: “You have the billions… I have the truth.” She’s not stopping until the world knows exactly what happened on September 10th. This is the most explosive episode yet. TPUSA has been cagey from day 1 — hiding 4K footage, gaslighting questions, attacking truth-tellers. Now the pieces finally fit. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Watch the full EPISODE before it gets scrubbed. Linked down below. 👇 Share if you want REAL transparency and justice for Charlie Kirk! 💥
17:59

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Candace Reads An EXPLOSIVE "Open Letter" to Erika Kirk LIVE on Podcast — Exposing Years of Lies, Betrayal, & the FULL PUZZLE Behind Charlie Kirk's Assassination! 😱🧩 Candace lays it ALL out publicly: • She & Charlie were like brother & sister until he lied to her face about a secret Mar-a-Lago meeting with Ike Perlmutter — the moment her trust shattered. • Post-Kanye, new influences (Stacy Sheridan, Tyler, Shane for security, Dan Floyd) hijacked Charlie’s ambition with “wrong money.” Candace warned him… he didn’t listen. • Erika arrived at the same time and lied straight to Candace’s face during a 4-hour hotel talk. Candace says every cruel attack on her (calling her antisemitic, claiming no contact since 2019) was done with Erika’s full blessing and funding. • Charlie predicted his own death in chilling detail on his phone (Candace has the texts). He told Erika his “adrenal glands were going off,” couldn’t sleep, had visions — classic signs he knew danger was coming. • Morning of Sept 10: Erika sent excited Charlie to sleep in their daughter’s room “for a good night’s sleep”… then the wedding band was mysteriously off. Candace flags the inconsistencies in Erika’s Jesse Watters interview. • THE BIG ONE: Verifiable proof that Erika & Justin Strife lied about “Pierre.” Pierre (French-born, Pierre Falcone of Angolagate fame) had a BILLIONS (not millions) deal on the table with TPUSA. He called Justin Strife & Don Orico IMMEDIATELY after the shooting. He knew Charlie was dead BEFORE the world — before Erika — and he wasn’t even a donor yet. • French-Israeli-Egyptian angle? Bibi Netanyahu personally offered to “take TPUSA to the next level” in the Hamptons (Erika was there) — Charlie said NO and refused Bibi on his podcast. Candace connects it to trafficking networks and why Pierre knew first. • Erika’s alibi on the morning of the murder? Candace has proof it’s been edited/changed. Egyptian planes, tarmac wait times, who was on which plane — the story doesn’t add up. Candace ends with fire: “You have the billions… I have the truth.” She’s not stopping until the world knows exactly what happened on September 10th. This is the most explosive episode yet. TPUSA has been cagey from day 1 — hiding 4K footage, gaslighting questions, attacking truth-tellers. Now the pieces finally fit. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Watch the full EPISODE before it gets scrubbed. Linked down below. 👇 Share if you want REAL transparency and justice for Charlie Kirk! 💥

Project Constitution

179,089 次观看 • 6 个月前

[Seoul Economy] 'His face tells a story and is a public welfare benefit'… BTS V enchants Paris with his unmatched presence. V captivated Paris, France, once again showcasing why he is regarded as a fashion icon. On June 28, V made a surprise appearance at the world-renowned brand Celine's Spring/Summer 2027 Men's Collection show held in Paris, France. This collection marked the first men's collection presented by Celine's new creative director, Michael Rider, making it an event that had already attracted tremendous attention from the global fashion industry even before its unveiling. The event was attended by numerous world-famous celebrities, including music producer Mark Ronson and legendary pop star Grace Jones, becoming a major talking point. Among them, V, Celine's global ambassador, radiated an unmatched aura and undoubtedly heated up the atmosphere at the venue. Having consistently embodied Celine's minimalist and understated luxury aesthetic, V once again fully demonstrated his own distinctive sense of style at this show. In particular, he appeared wearing a look from the Spring/Summer 2027 Men's Collection that was being revealed to the public for the very first time, drawing an endless barrage of camera flashes from the press. He completed his signature refined styling by layering a striking red shirt with a muted red jacket, paired with generously cut, relaxed-fit trousers. With his irreplaceable visuals and captivating attitude, he reinterpreted the brand's sophisticated aesthetic in a way that transcends trends, earning generous praise from those at the venue and from the global fashion industry alike. As Celine's global ambassador, V has continued to maintain a strong partnership with the brand by consistently participating in various global projects and official events. Even after completing his military service, he continues to impress with his unchanged visuals and even greater sense of maturity, leading not only popular culture but also global fashion trends in real time. Once again, he has proven his immense influence as a global icon whose impact extends beyond music into fashion and culture as a whole. After setting Paris abuzz and once again redefining legendary visuals, BTS V is expected to continue his diverse global activities on the world stage. That was the latest news on singer V. ( V FOR CELINE FASHION SHOW TAEHYUNG TAEHYUNG #TAEHYUNGxCELINE #CELINESS27 #VxCelineSS27 CELINE
2:26

[Seoul Economy] 'His face tells a story and is a public welfare benefit'… BTS V enchants Paris with his unmatched presence. V captivated Paris, France, once again showcasing why he is regarded as a fashion icon. On June 28, V made a surprise appearance at the world-renowned brand Celine's Spring/Summer 2027 Men's Collection show held in Paris, France. This collection marked the first men's collection presented by Celine's new creative director, Michael Rider, making it an event that had already attracted tremendous attention from the global fashion industry even before its unveiling. The event was attended by numerous world-famous celebrities, including music producer Mark Ronson and legendary pop star Grace Jones, becoming a major talking point. Among them, V, Celine's global ambassador, radiated an unmatched aura and undoubtedly heated up the atmosphere at the venue. Having consistently embodied Celine's minimalist and understated luxury aesthetic, V once again fully demonstrated his own distinctive sense of style at this show. In particular, he appeared wearing a look from the Spring/Summer 2027 Men's Collection that was being revealed to the public for the very first time, drawing an endless barrage of camera flashes from the press. He completed his signature refined styling by layering a striking red shirt with a muted red jacket, paired with generously cut, relaxed-fit trousers. With his irreplaceable visuals and captivating attitude, he reinterpreted the brand's sophisticated aesthetic in a way that transcends trends, earning generous praise from those at the venue and from the global fashion industry alike. As Celine's global ambassador, V has continued to maintain a strong partnership with the brand by consistently participating in various global projects and official events. Even after completing his military service, he continues to impress with his unchanged visuals and even greater sense of maturity, leading not only popular culture but also global fashion trends in real time. Once again, he has proven his immense influence as a global icon whose impact extends beyond music into fashion and culture as a whole. After setting Paris abuzz and once again redefining legendary visuals, BTS V is expected to continue his diverse global activities on the world stage. That was the latest news on singer V. ( V FOR CELINE FASHION SHOW TAEHYUNG TAEHYUNG #TAEHYUNGxCELINE #CELINESS27 #VxCelineSS27 CELINE

Taehyung Naver

37,057 次观看 • 1 个月前

Now You Know Why We Sent You That Link: Madonna Lights Up Saint Laurent in Paris An hour ago we gave you the link to watch the Saint Laurent show live — and now you know exactly why. Madonna is in the front row in Paris tonight, and for a Confessions II campaign built entirely around the dance floor, the timing could not be more perfect. She arrives in the city ahead of the special screening of Confessions II – The Film, and the Saint Laurent front row read like a guest list lifted straight from the film’s “Danceteria” sequence. Stuart Price — her co-architect on both Confessions records — was at her side. So was Arca, who co-produced the album’s opener “I Feel So Free.” And there was Debi Mazar, Madonna’s dear friend of more than forty years, who appears in the “Danceteria” segment herself — tonight accompanied by her own daughter. Kate Moss, also part of the film’s “Danceteria” cast, completed the picture — so that for a moment, the front row felt less like a fashion crowd and more like that downtown club scene reassembled in the flesh. And then, the moment fans had been quietly praying for. Off to the side, Madonna finally shared her first encounter with Connor Storrie — the Heated Rivalry star adored as much for his easy magnetism as for the role that made his name, and the young actor whose viral “Like a Prayer” dance for Interview reintroduced the song to a whole new generation. The two had both attended Saint Laurent’s January show without the cameras ever catching them together. Tonight, at last, they did.
2:06

Now You Know Why We Sent You That Link: Madonna Lights Up Saint Laurent in Paris An hour ago we gave you the link to watch the Saint Laurent show live — and now you know exactly why. Madonna is in the front row in Paris tonight, and for a Confessions II campaign built entirely around the dance floor, the timing could not be more perfect. She arrives in the city ahead of the special screening of Confessions II – The Film, and the Saint Laurent front row read like a guest list lifted straight from the film’s “Danceteria” sequence. Stuart Price — her co-architect on both Confessions records — was at her side. So was Arca, who co-produced the album’s opener “I Feel So Free.” And there was Debi Mazar, Madonna’s dear friend of more than forty years, who appears in the “Danceteria” segment herself — tonight accompanied by her own daughter. Kate Moss, also part of the film’s “Danceteria” cast, completed the picture — so that for a moment, the front row felt less like a fashion crowd and more like that downtown club scene reassembled in the flesh. And then, the moment fans had been quietly praying for. Off to the side, Madonna finally shared her first encounter with Connor Storrie — the Heated Rivalry star adored as much for his easy magnetism as for the role that made his name, and the young actor whose viral “Like a Prayer” dance for Interview reintroduced the song to a whole new generation. The two had both attended Saint Laurent’s January show without the cameras ever catching them together. Tonight, at last, they did.

DrownedMadonna

66,587 次观看 • 1 个月前

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮
29:17

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮

aussie17

797,301 次观看 • 2 年前

Here are the facts about “The Missing Scientists” story: The Air Force general who ran Wright-Patterson's research lab, oversaw the Pentagon's most classified programs, and was named in WikiLeaks emails as a central figure in UFO disclosure vanished from his Albuquerque home without triggering a single surveillance camera. Eight days earlier, Trump ordered the Pentagon to begin releasing UFO files. In the same twelve-month window, the NASA scientist who co-invented a strategic rocket engine super alloy at the same Wright Patterson lab overseen by the General disappeared on a hike, an MIT fusion physicist (who was as deep as anybody on “fast magnetic reconnection problems” which are the fundamental bottleneck to widescale nuclear fusion) was assassinated on his doorstep, and a very-polymathic Caltech astronomer working on the state-of-the-art Vera Rubin Observatory was shot dead on his porch. There is a pattern: scientists at the frontier of fusion, exotic propulsion, advanced metallurgy, and space surveillance are being silenced and taken out. We trace this history back decades and place it in its proper context: scientific suppression in frontier areas isn’t new; it’s an almost-ubiquitous historical artifact. 1. The General Who Knew Everything Vanished Without a Trace On February 27, 2026, retired Major General Neil McCasland left his Albuquerque home on foot. He left behind his phone, prescription glasses, and smartwatch. He took a red backpack, his wallet, and a .38 caliber revolver. His wife reported him missing within three hours. Despite FBI involvement, the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, search dogs, drones, helicopters, horseback teams, FLIR sweeps, and 700 canvassed households, no confirmed sighting of McCasland has ever surfaced. Surveillance cameras covered both ends of his street. None captured his direction of travel. After weeks of searching, the only item recovered was a gray Air Force sweatshirt a mile east of his house. Testing could not confirm it was his. 2. McCasland Ran the Pentagon's Most Classified Science Programs McCasland graduated from the Air Force Academy, earned a PhD in astronautical engineering from MIT on a Hertz Fellowship, and studied at Harvard's Kennedy School. From 2009 to 2011, he served as Director of Special Programs in the office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisitions, Technology, and Logistics, the office that oversees acquisition special access programs accounting for roughly 75 to 80 percent of all SAPs in the Department of Defense. From 2011 to 2013, he commanded the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, overseeing a $2.2 billion portfolio spanning advanced materials, exotic propulsion, and future weapons. Wright-Patterson is the alleged home of the Roswell crash debris. McCasland ran the entire lab. 3. WikiLeaks Emails Placed McCasland at the Center of UFO Disclosure In 2016, hacked emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta revealed correspondence from Tom DeLonge naming McCasland directly. DeLonge wrote that McCasland helped assemble his advisory team, was deeply aware of what DeLonge was trying to achieve, and had received a four-hour briefing on the project. DeLonge added that McCasland ran the laboratory at Wright-Patterson where the Roswell material was shipped. McCasland's wife Susan later acknowledged he was caught up in the Russian hack and had less contact with DeLonge after the emails were released. Less, not zero. A Google Calendar invite in the same email dump shows Susan herself accepted an invitation for a DeLonge-Podesta meeting. 4. Disappeared Eight Days After Trump's UFO Disclosure Order On February 19, 2026, Trump announced on Truth Social that he was directing the Pentagon to begin releasing government files related to aliens and UAP. Eight days later, McCasland was gone. If McCasland was involved in legacy UFO programs, the release order could have been a pressure point. His wife had reported that both of them were seeing a doctor for anxiety, poor sleep, and memory issues. She also said he had made a comment about not wanting to live if his body and mind kept deteriorating, but characterized it as an offhand remark, not a genuine threat. She later stated publicly that McCasland was not confused or disoriented. The week before he vanished, he cycled 60 miles. 5. The Super Alloy Scientist Vanished 30 Feet Behind Her Friends On June 22, 2025, NASA material scientist Monica Reza disappeared while hiking near Mount Waterman in the Angeles National Forest. She was 30 feet behind her group and then she was gone. Search and rescue scoured the area for eight days by land and air. They found her beanie roughly 400 yards off the trail. Nothing else. Civilian volunteer teams continued searching for six months. No remains, no dens, no evidence of animal attack. Multiple searchers who descended the nearest ravine described the terrain as steep but not steep enough to be fatal. 6. Super Alloy Invention Was Developed Under McCasland's Research Lab Monica Reza and Dallas Hardwick co-invented Mondeloy, a nickel-based super alloy engineered to survive the crushing pressure and oxygen-rich conditions that had defeated every previous rocket engine material. The alloy ended America's dependence on Russia's RD-180 engine for sensitive national security launches. Mondeloy was co-developed through a partnership between the Air Force Research Laboratory and Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne. Neil McCasland arrived at Wright-Patterson as AFRL commander in May 2011 while the Mondeloy program was still active. Dallas Hardwick was embedded in the lab's materials directorate until 2012. The scientist who solved one of America's hardest propulsion problems and the general who oversaw the lab where it happened both vanished within eight months of each other. 7. MIT's Top Fusion Physicist Was Shot in His Doorway On December 15, 2025, Nuno Loureiro was shot in the foyer of his Brookline home at 8:30 p.m. His wife, mother, and daughters were inside playing cards. His 12-year-old daughter had opened the door moments earlier and saw a man she thought was a delivery driver holding a package with a barcode. Loureiro replaced her at the door and was hit in the upper chest, abdomen, and both thighs. He was conscious and alert when paramedics arrived. He went into surgery that night and was pronounced dead the following morning. Loureiro was deputy director of MIT's Plasma Science and Fusion Center and one of the world's leading experts on magnetic reconnection, the key obstacle to sustained nuclear fusion. 8. His Killer Planned for Three Years, Then Went Dark for 48 Hours The top suspect, Claudio Valente, a Portuguese national who had studied physics at the same Lisbon university as Loureiro in the 1990s, had already opened fire at Brown University two days earlier, killing two students. Valente spent three years conducting surveillance on the Brown campus before the attack. But between the Brown shooting on December 13 and Loureiro's murder on December 15, Valente's movements go largely unaccounted for. How he located Loureiro, confirmed he was home, and timed the approach remains unexplained. Loureiro had just returned from a trip to Washington. Valente's confession videos describe both attacks as intentional but leave the motive for targeting Loureiro maddeningly vague. 9. The Caltech Astronomer Was Killed by a Man a Judge Had Already Released On February 16, 2026, Caltech astronomer Carl Grillmair was shot dead on his porch in Llano, California. Two months earlier, 29-year-old Freddy Snyder had been arrested on Grillmair's property carrying a loaded unregistered rifle. Despite the trespassing charge and an attempted jail escape, a judge released Snyder on his own recognizance and told him to take a gun safety course. Snyder returned and killed him. Grillmair had recently begun work on the Vera Rubin Observatory, the most powerful sky survey ever built, one capable of detecting interstellar objects and potentially UFOs in Earth's orbit. He was also a renowned polymathic genius, like Loureiro. Every image Rubin captures is reviewed and filtered by the Pentagon before scientists are allowed to see it. Investigators have found no motive and no prior relationship between the two men. Why This Matters But the concentration of loss at the exact frontier of fusion, propulsion, advanced materials, and space surveillance is difficult to dismiss. Congressman Tim Burchett told the DailyMail the numbers seem very high in these certain areas of research. Constitutional lawyer Danny Sheehan described a covert circle of 24 retired officials from the DOD, CIA, and private aerospace quietly working to bring classified UAP programs back under government oversight. The real crown jewels are not weapons or hard drives. They are the minds that solved the problems no one else could. And those minds keep disappearing. Full episode documents this in detail 👇
2:14

Here are the facts about “The Missing Scientists” story: The Air Force general who ran Wright-Patterson's research lab, oversaw the Pentagon's most classified programs, and was named in WikiLeaks emails as a central figure in UFO disclosure vanished from his Albuquerque home without triggering a single surveillance camera. Eight days earlier, Trump ordered the Pentagon to begin releasing UFO files. In the same twelve-month window, the NASA scientist who co-invented a strategic rocket engine super alloy at the same Wright Patterson lab overseen by the General disappeared on a hike, an MIT fusion physicist (who was as deep as anybody on “fast magnetic reconnection problems” which are the fundamental bottleneck to widescale nuclear fusion) was assassinated on his doorstep, and a very-polymathic Caltech astronomer working on the state-of-the-art Vera Rubin Observatory was shot dead on his porch. There is a pattern: scientists at the frontier of fusion, exotic propulsion, advanced metallurgy, and space surveillance are being silenced and taken out. We trace this history back decades and place it in its proper context: scientific suppression in frontier areas isn’t new; it’s an almost-ubiquitous historical artifact. 1. The General Who Knew Everything Vanished Without a Trace On February 27, 2026, retired Major General Neil McCasland left his Albuquerque home on foot. He left behind his phone, prescription glasses, and smartwatch. He took a red backpack, his wallet, and a .38 caliber revolver. His wife reported him missing within three hours. Despite FBI involvement, the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, search dogs, drones, helicopters, horseback teams, FLIR sweeps, and 700 canvassed households, no confirmed sighting of McCasland has ever surfaced. Surveillance cameras covered both ends of his street. None captured his direction of travel. After weeks of searching, the only item recovered was a gray Air Force sweatshirt a mile east of his house. Testing could not confirm it was his. 2. McCasland Ran the Pentagon's Most Classified Science Programs McCasland graduated from the Air Force Academy, earned a PhD in astronautical engineering from MIT on a Hertz Fellowship, and studied at Harvard's Kennedy School. From 2009 to 2011, he served as Director of Special Programs in the office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisitions, Technology, and Logistics, the office that oversees acquisition special access programs accounting for roughly 75 to 80 percent of all SAPs in the Department of Defense. From 2011 to 2013, he commanded the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, overseeing a $2.2 billion portfolio spanning advanced materials, exotic propulsion, and future weapons. Wright-Patterson is the alleged home of the Roswell crash debris. McCasland ran the entire lab. 3. WikiLeaks Emails Placed McCasland at the Center of UFO Disclosure In 2016, hacked emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta revealed correspondence from Tom DeLonge naming McCasland directly. DeLonge wrote that McCasland helped assemble his advisory team, was deeply aware of what DeLonge was trying to achieve, and had received a four-hour briefing on the project. DeLonge added that McCasland ran the laboratory at Wright-Patterson where the Roswell material was shipped. McCasland's wife Susan later acknowledged he was caught up in the Russian hack and had less contact with DeLonge after the emails were released. Less, not zero. A Google Calendar invite in the same email dump shows Susan herself accepted an invitation for a DeLonge-Podesta meeting. 4. Disappeared Eight Days After Trump's UFO Disclosure Order On February 19, 2026, Trump announced on Truth Social that he was directing the Pentagon to begin releasing government files related to aliens and UAP. Eight days later, McCasland was gone. If McCasland was involved in legacy UFO programs, the release order could have been a pressure point. His wife had reported that both of them were seeing a doctor for anxiety, poor sleep, and memory issues. She also said he had made a comment about not wanting to live if his body and mind kept deteriorating, but characterized it as an offhand remark, not a genuine threat. She later stated publicly that McCasland was not confused or disoriented. The week before he vanished, he cycled 60 miles. 5. The Super Alloy Scientist Vanished 30 Feet Behind Her Friends On June 22, 2025, NASA material scientist Monica Reza disappeared while hiking near Mount Waterman in the Angeles National Forest. She was 30 feet behind her group and then she was gone. Search and rescue scoured the area for eight days by land and air. They found her beanie roughly 400 yards off the trail. Nothing else. Civilian volunteer teams continued searching for six months. No remains, no dens, no evidence of animal attack. Multiple searchers who descended the nearest ravine described the terrain as steep but not steep enough to be fatal. 6. Super Alloy Invention Was Developed Under McCasland's Research Lab Monica Reza and Dallas Hardwick co-invented Mondeloy, a nickel-based super alloy engineered to survive the crushing pressure and oxygen-rich conditions that had defeated every previous rocket engine material. The alloy ended America's dependence on Russia's RD-180 engine for sensitive national security launches. Mondeloy was co-developed through a partnership between the Air Force Research Laboratory and Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne. Neil McCasland arrived at Wright-Patterson as AFRL commander in May 2011 while the Mondeloy program was still active. Dallas Hardwick was embedded in the lab's materials directorate until 2012. The scientist who solved one of America's hardest propulsion problems and the general who oversaw the lab where it happened both vanished within eight months of each other. 7. MIT's Top Fusion Physicist Was Shot in His Doorway On December 15, 2025, Nuno Loureiro was shot in the foyer of his Brookline home at 8:30 p.m. His wife, mother, and daughters were inside playing cards. His 12-year-old daughter had opened the door moments earlier and saw a man she thought was a delivery driver holding a package with a barcode. Loureiro replaced her at the door and was hit in the upper chest, abdomen, and both thighs. He was conscious and alert when paramedics arrived. He went into surgery that night and was pronounced dead the following morning. Loureiro was deputy director of MIT's Plasma Science and Fusion Center and one of the world's leading experts on magnetic reconnection, the key obstacle to sustained nuclear fusion. 8. His Killer Planned for Three Years, Then Went Dark for 48 Hours The top suspect, Claudio Valente, a Portuguese national who had studied physics at the same Lisbon university as Loureiro in the 1990s, had already opened fire at Brown University two days earlier, killing two students. Valente spent three years conducting surveillance on the Brown campus before the attack. But between the Brown shooting on December 13 and Loureiro's murder on December 15, Valente's movements go largely unaccounted for. How he located Loureiro, confirmed he was home, and timed the approach remains unexplained. Loureiro had just returned from a trip to Washington. Valente's confession videos describe both attacks as intentional but leave the motive for targeting Loureiro maddeningly vague. 9. The Caltech Astronomer Was Killed by a Man a Judge Had Already Released On February 16, 2026, Caltech astronomer Carl Grillmair was shot dead on his porch in Llano, California. Two months earlier, 29-year-old Freddy Snyder had been arrested on Grillmair's property carrying a loaded unregistered rifle. Despite the trespassing charge and an attempted jail escape, a judge released Snyder on his own recognizance and told him to take a gun safety course. Snyder returned and killed him. Grillmair had recently begun work on the Vera Rubin Observatory, the most powerful sky survey ever built, one capable of detecting interstellar objects and potentially UFOs in Earth's orbit. He was also a renowned polymathic genius, like Loureiro. Every image Rubin captures is reviewed and filtered by the Pentagon before scientists are allowed to see it. Investigators have found no motive and no prior relationship between the two men. Why This Matters But the concentration of loss at the exact frontier of fusion, propulsion, advanced materials, and space surveillance is difficult to dismiss. Congressman Tim Burchett told the DailyMail the numbers seem very high in these certain areas of research. Constitutional lawyer Danny Sheehan described a covert circle of 24 retired officials from the DOD, CIA, and private aerospace quietly working to bring classified UAP programs back under government oversight. The real crown jewels are not weapons or hard drives. They are the minds that solved the problems no one else could. And those minds keep disappearing. Full episode documents this in detail 👇

Jesse Michels

260,004 次观看 • 3 个月前

Drake dropped a major diss people are sleeping on. On Janice STFU he raps: "Swear my label gotta free me, baby Ayy, buried alive, somеone come dig me up If I call up your shawty right now, shе pickin' up, yeah You boys got big off my name, that's big enough" I think this whole thing is a double entendre, talking about ASAP Rocky and Kendrick Lamar, but also his record label. Them boys got big off of his name, Universal. But 10 years ago he dropped the song Sneakin' with 21 Savage. On Sneakin' he raps: "Plus I never met nobody from my label, nigga I just pop up with the music then they pay a nigga (Yeah)" He shoots the Janice STFU music video with a similar style coat that he did in the "Sneakin'" music video, in a similar resolution with the square, not the wide, and also the theme is a car garage. Most of the other music videos for this new album are filmed wide. Sneakin' was also when he gave 21 Savage a red Ferrari as a gift. On top of that, Universal has been taking down anybody who posts the Janice "STFU" music video clips for copyright here on X.
0:35

Drake dropped a major diss people are sleeping on. On Janice STFU he raps: "Swear my label gotta free me, baby Ayy, buried alive, somеone come dig me up If I call up your shawty right now, shе pickin' up, yeah You boys got big off my name, that's big enough" I think this whole thing is a double entendre, talking about ASAP Rocky and Kendrick Lamar, but also his record label. Them boys got big off of his name, Universal. But 10 years ago he dropped the song Sneakin' with 21 Savage. On Sneakin' he raps: "Plus I never met nobody from my label, nigga I just pop up with the music then they pay a nigga (Yeah)" He shoots the Janice STFU music video with a similar style coat that he did in the "Sneakin'" music video, in a similar resolution with the square, not the wide, and also the theme is a car garage. Most of the other music videos for this new album are filmed wide. Sneakin' was also when he gave 21 Savage a red Ferrari as a gift. On top of that, Universal has been taking down anybody who posts the Janice "STFU" music video clips for copyright here on X.

hy

388,884 次观看 • 2 个月前

Thomas Edison paid neighborhood kids 25 cents to help him run a killing campaign against his biggest competitor. He was trying to stop America from building a shared electrical grid. But he lost that fight in 1890, and this month the richest companies on Earth started finishing the job for him: By 1888 Edison had wired his entire empire to direct current. His rival George Westinghouse was selling alternating current, and the gap between them decided what the country would look like. Direct current could not travel. Edison's system needed a generating station roughly every mile, so power had to be made where it got burned. Meanwhile alternating current could move long distances along a wire. One of those systems gives you a national grid that everybody shares. The other gives you thousands of private power islands owned by whoever paid for the station. Edison was losing on the engineering and he knew it. So he stopped arguing about engineering and started proving that his competitor's electricity killed things. Proving that required bodies, and bodies had to be bought... That is what the 25 cents was for. Neighborhood boys brought stray dogs to his laboratory in West Orange, New Jersey, where an engineer named Harold Brown killed them with Westinghouse current in front of anyone who would watch. On July 30, 1888, Brown took the act to a lecture room at Columbia College and showed a crowd of electricians and journalists that 1,000 volts of Edison's current left a dog alive while 300 volts of Westinghouse's killed it. Brown told the room that alternating current was fit only for "the dog pound, the slaughterhouse, and the state prison." And that last one was the actual plan: New York had legalized execution by electricity on June 4, 1888, without specifying which current the state would use, so Edison went straight at it. He staged a demonstration for the state committee at his own laboratory, where calves and a horse were wired to electrodes and killed with alternating current. The animals did not die quickly but the committee was impressed anyway. Westinghouse saw the trap and refused to sell his generators for executions. So Edison's company and Brown went through a third rival, Thomson-Houston, and secretly acquired three Westinghouse generators anyway. Edison then pushed a new word for being executed. He wanted people to say the condemned man had been "Westinghoused." On August 6, 1890, William Kemmler became the first man to die in an electric chair, powered by a generator Westinghouse had refused to sell for the purpose. But the first jolt failed and the current had to be built back up while Kemmler was still alive in the chair. Witnesses fainted and vomited. Westinghouse had paid for Kemmler's legal defense, which argued that electrocution was cruel and unusual punishment. Edison was actually opposing the death penalty the whole time. He pushed for the chair anyway, because a chair running on Westinghouse current would brand his competitor as the man who sold death to the state. But it did not work. Utilities kept buying alternating current because it was the only system that could move power across a state, and by the early 1890s Edison's OWN subsidiaries were installing it. He had lost control of his company by then, and the grid got built on top of the current he spent two years calling a killer. That brings us back to this month: 46 planned data centers with a combined 56 gigawatts intend to skip the grid completely and generate their own power on site, according to the energy data firm Cleanview. The Department of Energy says one data center can pull 10 to 50x more electricity per square foot than a normal office building. Meta and BlackRock announced a 1 gigawatt campus in El Paso yesterday at roughly $14 billion. This morning the FCC moved to bar Chinese made grid inverters from the country on national security grounds. The shared grid is the thing that beat Thomas Edison. Big Tech is now walking away from it and rebuilding exactly what he wanted in 1888, because the public system cannot deliver power fast enough for them. Edison lost the argument about how electricity should reach people. But 136 years late, he's winning it, and nobody finishing the job for him is going to be regulated as a utility.
1:31

Thomas Edison paid neighborhood kids 25 cents to help him run a killing campaign against his biggest competitor. He was trying to stop America from building a shared electrical grid. But he lost that fight in 1890, and this month the richest companies on Earth started finishing the job for him: By 1888 Edison had wired his entire empire to direct current. His rival George Westinghouse was selling alternating current, and the gap between them decided what the country would look like. Direct current could not travel. Edison's system needed a generating station roughly every mile, so power had to be made where it got burned. Meanwhile alternating current could move long distances along a wire. One of those systems gives you a national grid that everybody shares. The other gives you thousands of private power islands owned by whoever paid for the station. Edison was losing on the engineering and he knew it. So he stopped arguing about engineering and started proving that his competitor's electricity killed things. Proving that required bodies, and bodies had to be bought... That is what the 25 cents was for. Neighborhood boys brought stray dogs to his laboratory in West Orange, New Jersey, where an engineer named Harold Brown killed them with Westinghouse current in front of anyone who would watch. On July 30, 1888, Brown took the act to a lecture room at Columbia College and showed a crowd of electricians and journalists that 1,000 volts of Edison's current left a dog alive while 300 volts of Westinghouse's killed it. Brown told the room that alternating current was fit only for "the dog pound, the slaughterhouse, and the state prison." And that last one was the actual plan: New York had legalized execution by electricity on June 4, 1888, without specifying which current the state would use, so Edison went straight at it. He staged a demonstration for the state committee at his own laboratory, where calves and a horse were wired to electrodes and killed with alternating current. The animals did not die quickly but the committee was impressed anyway. Westinghouse saw the trap and refused to sell his generators for executions. So Edison's company and Brown went through a third rival, Thomson-Houston, and secretly acquired three Westinghouse generators anyway. Edison then pushed a new word for being executed. He wanted people to say the condemned man had been "Westinghoused." On August 6, 1890, William Kemmler became the first man to die in an electric chair, powered by a generator Westinghouse had refused to sell for the purpose. But the first jolt failed and the current had to be built back up while Kemmler was still alive in the chair. Witnesses fainted and vomited. Westinghouse had paid for Kemmler's legal defense, which argued that electrocution was cruel and unusual punishment. Edison was actually opposing the death penalty the whole time. He pushed for the chair anyway, because a chair running on Westinghouse current would brand his competitor as the man who sold death to the state. But it did not work. Utilities kept buying alternating current because it was the only system that could move power across a state, and by the early 1890s Edison's OWN subsidiaries were installing it. He had lost control of his company by then, and the grid got built on top of the current he spent two years calling a killer. That brings us back to this month: 46 planned data centers with a combined 56 gigawatts intend to skip the grid completely and generate their own power on site, according to the energy data firm Cleanview. The Department of Energy says one data center can pull 10 to 50x more electricity per square foot than a normal office building. Meta and BlackRock announced a 1 gigawatt campus in El Paso yesterday at roughly $14 billion. This morning the FCC moved to bar Chinese made grid inverters from the country on national security grounds. The shared grid is the thing that beat Thomas Edison. Big Tech is now walking away from it and rebuilding exactly what he wanted in 1888, because the public system cannot deliver power fast enough for them. Edison lost the argument about how electricity should reach people. But 136 years late, he's winning it, and nobody finishing the job for him is going to be regulated as a utility.

Ricardo

20,741 次观看 • 15 天前

We can speculate all we want about the situation involving “Chud The Builder” and Joshua Fox… But investigators used ACTUAL surveillance footage from the courthouse to determine charges. Not to mention there were SEVERAL officers in the IMMEDIATE vicinity who SAW WHAT HAPPENED. That’s why he was charged how he was. Not because “they’re trying to make an example of him.” Claiming he “dindu nuffin” while pretending his case is about “suppressing free speech” is inaccurate. Or the theory that many are arguing that saying “nigger” should mean a death sentence to non white people. Inaccurate reframing at best and total victim mentality cope at worst. Just like most claims being pushed online by bigots, bots or the “I’m a victim” energy the BLM crowd was on for awhile. Here’s the irony: His schtick was built on the idea that words alone shouldn’t provoke violence. And by police accounts of the SURVEILLANCE footage…. This started as a VERBAL confrontation. Then HE allegedly attempted to draw a firearm and use it over an argument. So basically HE chimped out OVER WORDS. Either believe the police in the affidavit or… Wait until THAT surveillance footage THEY used as a reference comes out. To speculate without being robust about the process exposes ignorance and/or bias. Neither are solid moves. If HE initiated and drew a firearm…. It becomes very plausible that the victim reacted out of fear and fight or flight. When someone draws a gun to intimidate (which is brandishing) it’s reasonable the victim defend themselves. Eventually, the surveillance footage (and possibly the livestream) will become public and if it shows what the police allege… All some who’ve spoken prematurely will have done is showcased their victim mentality or lack of understanding of this process. So I’ll get ahead of this by saying.. In my view, based on the charges and statements from authorities, they clearly believe Dalton was responsible for escalating the situation. So based on THOSE initial reports… He’s not a martyr or a free speech hero. He’s a horrible representation of gun owners that anti gunners will paint as the standard gun owner AND MORE SPECIFICALLY… Will paint as most WHITE MALE gun owners. Smart money move for those who ARE safe and responsible gun owners? Call him the erratic gun owner he currently appears to be, which is NOT the standard gun owners hold themselves to. Maintain that stance until new evidence proves to the contrary. Then berobust and OBJECTIVE on that new position based on new FACTS. Anything else is sub par tactics.
1:31

We can speculate all we want about the situation involving “Chud The Builder” and Joshua Fox… But investigators used ACTUAL surveillance footage from the courthouse to determine charges. Not to mention there were SEVERAL officers in the IMMEDIATE vicinity who SAW WHAT HAPPENED. That’s why he was charged how he was. Not because “they’re trying to make an example of him.” Claiming he “dindu nuffin” while pretending his case is about “suppressing free speech” is inaccurate. Or the theory that many are arguing that saying “nigger” should mean a death sentence to non white people. Inaccurate reframing at best and total victim mentality cope at worst. Just like most claims being pushed online by bigots, bots or the “I’m a victim” energy the BLM crowd was on for awhile. Here’s the irony: His schtick was built on the idea that words alone shouldn’t provoke violence. And by police accounts of the SURVEILLANCE footage…. This started as a VERBAL confrontation. Then HE allegedly attempted to draw a firearm and use it over an argument. So basically HE chimped out OVER WORDS. Either believe the police in the affidavit or… Wait until THAT surveillance footage THEY used as a reference comes out. To speculate without being robust about the process exposes ignorance and/or bias. Neither are solid moves. If HE initiated and drew a firearm…. It becomes very plausible that the victim reacted out of fear and fight or flight. When someone draws a gun to intimidate (which is brandishing) it’s reasonable the victim defend themselves. Eventually, the surveillance footage (and possibly the livestream) will become public and if it shows what the police allege… All some who’ve spoken prematurely will have done is showcased their victim mentality or lack of understanding of this process. So I’ll get ahead of this by saying.. In my view, based on the charges and statements from authorities, they clearly believe Dalton was responsible for escalating the situation. So based on THOSE initial reports… He’s not a martyr or a free speech hero. He’s a horrible representation of gun owners that anti gunners will paint as the standard gun owner AND MORE SPECIFICALLY… Will paint as most WHITE MALE gun owners. Smart money move for those who ARE safe and responsible gun owners? Call him the erratic gun owner he currently appears to be, which is NOT the standard gun owners hold themselves to. Maintain that stance until new evidence proves to the contrary. Then berobust and OBJECTIVE on that new position based on new FACTS. Anything else is sub par tactics.

MajToure999

32,497 次观看 • 2 个月前

In 1998, Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. Everyone advised Tim Cook not to join. "They thought it was headed straight down." He saw something different. A sparkle in Steve's eye. He spent 6 minutes explaining what Jobs actually taught him: Steve Jobs was a teacher. "He taught me the value of focus, the importance of simplicity, the fact that making things simple is so much harder than making things complex." "For those of us that were fortunate enough to work with him, he was the teacher of a lifetime." When Jobs recruited him, Cook trusted his gut. "There was a feeling I had in talking to Steve that he was a very different kind of CEO. He was focused on products, products, and products." "He had a belief that small teams could do amazing work. I love that vision." Everyone else was chasing enterprise. Jobs wanted consumers. "In an environment where everyone was going to an enterprise kind of company, he wanted to refocus Apple on consumers." "It was brilliant because at the time nobody was doing that. Everybody thought you could not make any money selling to consumers." "I've never thought it was a good idea to follow the herd." Cook saw what others missed. "I thought I had a chance of a lifetime to work with the creative genius that started the entire industry. I didn't want to pass that up." People had forgotten how close Apple was to death. "Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. It was a really awful time. People advised me not to come because they thought it was headed straight down." "But I saw something different. I saw the sparkle in Steve's eye. It meant we could pull off this turnaround for this American treasure." "I'm so glad to have been a part of that team." The teams that built Apple's greatest products were tiny. "He taught me the value of innovation, the fact that small teams could do amazing things." "I look at the size of the iPod team initially. I look at the size of the iPhone team. These were very small teams in the scheme of things." Jobs hired people who challenged him. "Hiring the best people to surround you that challenge you. That have skills that you don't. And being confident with that." The skill that made Jobs different wasn't conviction. It was flexibility. "He taught me not to be married to my past views. Not to be so proud you can't change your mind when you're presented with new evidence." "He could change like this." Cook was initially taken aback. "And then I became so enamored with it. Very few people have that skill because they get married to their past views." "I thought it was a brilliant skill." Did Jobs change Cook's mind? "Oh, he changed my mind about a lot of things. And he changed his mind about a lot of things." Did Cook ever change Jobs's mind? "Yes, of course. He loved to debate. He loved someone to debate him. You could always change his mind if you had the best idea." "We changed each other's minds. That's the reason it works so well." Cook sees supply chain as art. "Manufacturing has always interested me because I'm very curious about how things are made. I like to go to factories and see how things are put together, how they're created." "My undergraduate degree is in industrial engineering. It's essentially the study of people and machines and how the two working together can create things they couldn't create on their own." "I've always viewed the supply chain to be a bit of a piece of art when it's done correctly. It's a symphony of thousands of different components and parts coming together to create something." What did he sacrifice to get here? "Sleep. And fortunately, I love coffee." How much coffee? "Many cups. Please do not benchmark that." He starts every morning the same way. "I get up very early. I quickly go to the Mac and begin to go through the emails that have come in." "A lot of what I'm reading are from customers telling me how they're using our products and what it's doing for them." "I get notes that are positive and some that are not so positive. People feel free to reach out and voice their opinion. I think this is great because it keeps my hand on the pulse of the company." How does he handle criticism? "I have relatively thick skin. I try to internalize it and ask myself: is that accurate or not? Not just quickly put up a defensive shield and say why what we've done is right." What do people not realize about his job? "How much fun it is." "At times I hear other CEOs talk about how terrible their jobs are. Mine is fantastic. I love it." He made a 25-year plan in graduate school. "The first year or two was reasonably accurate. After that, it wasn't worth the paper it was written on." "Life has a way of happening and throwing you off from some well-crafted plan." "The most important thing is to roll with it. Make sure you recognize when doors are opening. And choose the one to walk through."
6:38

In 1998, Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. Everyone advised Tim Cook not to join. "They thought it was headed straight down." He saw something different. A sparkle in Steve's eye. He spent 6 minutes explaining what Jobs actually taught him: Steve Jobs was a teacher. "He taught me the value of focus, the importance of simplicity, the fact that making things simple is so much harder than making things complex." "For those of us that were fortunate enough to work with him, he was the teacher of a lifetime." When Jobs recruited him, Cook trusted his gut. "There was a feeling I had in talking to Steve that he was a very different kind of CEO. He was focused on products, products, and products." "He had a belief that small teams could do amazing work. I love that vision." Everyone else was chasing enterprise. Jobs wanted consumers. "In an environment where everyone was going to an enterprise kind of company, he wanted to refocus Apple on consumers." "It was brilliant because at the time nobody was doing that. Everybody thought you could not make any money selling to consumers." "I've never thought it was a good idea to follow the herd." Cook saw what others missed. "I thought I had a chance of a lifetime to work with the creative genius that started the entire industry. I didn't want to pass that up." People had forgotten how close Apple was to death. "Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. It was a really awful time. People advised me not to come because they thought it was headed straight down." "But I saw something different. I saw the sparkle in Steve's eye. It meant we could pull off this turnaround for this American treasure." "I'm so glad to have been a part of that team." The teams that built Apple's greatest products were tiny. "He taught me the value of innovation, the fact that small teams could do amazing things." "I look at the size of the iPod team initially. I look at the size of the iPhone team. These were very small teams in the scheme of things." Jobs hired people who challenged him. "Hiring the best people to surround you that challenge you. That have skills that you don't. And being confident with that." The skill that made Jobs different wasn't conviction. It was flexibility. "He taught me not to be married to my past views. Not to be so proud you can't change your mind when you're presented with new evidence." "He could change like this." Cook was initially taken aback. "And then I became so enamored with it. Very few people have that skill because they get married to their past views." "I thought it was a brilliant skill." Did Jobs change Cook's mind? "Oh, he changed my mind about a lot of things. And he changed his mind about a lot of things." Did Cook ever change Jobs's mind? "Yes, of course. He loved to debate. He loved someone to debate him. You could always change his mind if you had the best idea." "We changed each other's minds. That's the reason it works so well." Cook sees supply chain as art. "Manufacturing has always interested me because I'm very curious about how things are made. I like to go to factories and see how things are put together, how they're created." "My undergraduate degree is in industrial engineering. It's essentially the study of people and machines and how the two working together can create things they couldn't create on their own." "I've always viewed the supply chain to be a bit of a piece of art when it's done correctly. It's a symphony of thousands of different components and parts coming together to create something." What did he sacrifice to get here? "Sleep. And fortunately, I love coffee." How much coffee? "Many cups. Please do not benchmark that." He starts every morning the same way. "I get up very early. I quickly go to the Mac and begin to go through the emails that have come in." "A lot of what I'm reading are from customers telling me how they're using our products and what it's doing for them." "I get notes that are positive and some that are not so positive. People feel free to reach out and voice their opinion. I think this is great because it keeps my hand on the pulse of the company." How does he handle criticism? "I have relatively thick skin. I try to internalize it and ask myself: is that accurate or not? Not just quickly put up a defensive shield and say why what we've done is right." What do people not realize about his job? "How much fun it is." "At times I hear other CEOs talk about how terrible their jobs are. Mine is fantastic. I love it." He made a 25-year plan in graduate school. "The first year or two was reasonably accurate. After that, it wasn't worth the paper it was written on." "Life has a way of happening and throwing you off from some well-crafted plan." "The most important thing is to roll with it. Make sure you recognize when doors are opening. And choose the one to walk through."

Jaynit

17,580 次观看 • 3 个月前

Must-read: Cindy Cherry, Don Cherry’s late daughter, tells all in new book about her father and his cancellation Cindy writes that after 38 years of compelling television, her father was cancelled simply for saying “you people love our milk and honey” and the “least you could do” is buy a poppy on Remembrance Day. Hard to believe it’s been more than five years since the most highly viewed segment on Canadian TV was abruptly cancelled and its star maliciously thrown under the bus. All for no valid reason, well, other than cowardly corporate suits bending the knee to a tiny woke mob of leftwing zealots. We speak of Don Cherry, the coach in Coach’s Corner. Whether you loved or loathed Grapes, Coach’s Corner was must-see TV. Again, you either loved Don for his unvarnished honesty and frankness, which is an endangered species in the world of sports broadcasting today. Or you loved to hate Don Cherry, as you would love to hate an entertaining villain cutting promos in the bizarre biosphere that is professional wrestling. The point is, millions of Canadians would tune into Hockey Night in Canada every Saturday night at approximately 7:50 p.m. E.S.T. Coach’s Corner was many things to many people. But it was never, ever boring. We make mention of the cancellation of this cherished slice of Canadian culture thanks to the recent release of a new book entitled, The Don Cherry Story by His Daughter, Cindy Cherry. Cindy Cherry doesn’t waste any time cutting to the chase. Thus, she begins the story at the end of the story. Namely, when her father’s tenure on network TV came to an abrupt and shocking end on November 9, 2019. That first chapter is entitled “Poppygate” – which is a fitting term given that what happened to Don Cherry was indeed scandalous. Cindy writes that after 38 years of compelling television, her father was cancelled simply for saying “you people love our milk and honey” and the “least you could do” is buy a poppy on Remembrance Day. We have viewed that excerpt over and over and over again. We have analyzed Don’s words for any alleged racism or bigotry or xenophobia. And we come up empty every single time. Indeed, Don Cherry was simply speaking the truth. You know it, we know it, everybody knows it. He was bemoaning that not enough people in Canada honour the war dead and our veterans come November 11. This is not conjecture; it’s the indisputable truth. Indeed, on Remembrance Day 2019, the day Don was officially fired by the way, we visited Yonge-Dundas Square in downtown Toronto at 10 a.m. to observe how many people were wearing poppies. In other words, there we were at this busy intersection just 60 minutes before the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month. And we can tell you that less than 5% — yes, less than 5% — of passersby were wearing poppies that day. It was disgraceful, disgusting, and disrespectful. Oh no… was that a little harsh? Is Team Cancel Culture going to come for us now? Yet, the fact that Don Cherry was cancelled for speaking the truth makes for more proof in the pudding that freedom of speech is on thin ice in Canada these days. Due to political correctness, or its new name, “wokeness”, one is forbidden to speak the truth IF the truth hurts. That’s not freedom of speech — that’s censorship. Indeed, Don’s words somehow hurt the feelings of the uber-intolerant left. Or more accurately, these wokesters pretended to suffer from hurt feelings. Finally, these Marxists had some flimsy excuse to derail the career of a common sense patriotic Canadian that they loathed because of… oh, we don’t know… toxic masculinity? And let’s not forget the role of one particular liberal in this saga, namely Ron “The Rat” MacLean. Indeed, if Don’s words were so repugnant, then why didn’t Ron object? Rather, as Cindy Cherry notes, Ron was “bobbing his head in agreement throughout the dialogue, gave Dad the thumbs-up and at the end said, ‘love you for it.’” Furthermore, Cindy notes: “HNiC repeated this Coach’s Corner for their central Canadian viewers. How bad could they have felt it was if they rebroadcasted it?” But no, the cowardly suits at Rogers — caved to the vocal minority and quickly pulled the plug on Coach’s Corner. And when they did, Ron MacLean could’ve and should’ve taken a stand. He could’ve and should’ve said words to the effect of, “Hey, if Don goes, I go.” But then again, that would have made for a principled stand. And second banana rats aren’t all that concerned about principles, not when there’s a juicy six-figure salary on the line. It’s just business, baby. To add insult to injury, MacLean appeared the following Saturday to make a groveling apology. And soon thereafter Hockey Night in Canada went woefully woke in terms of the content aired between periods. It was insufferable and unwatchable. In the days that followed this cancellation, Cindy became further upset about the spin Poppygate was receiving. She writes: “The narrative that Rogers/Sportsnet and Ron put out to the rest of the media was that all Don had to do to keep his job was apologize and he wouldn’t. This is what a lot of the corporate media shills and people on social media jumped on—why didn’t Don just say he’s sorry and then he would have gotten back his job?” But Cindy says that narrative was completely bogus; that the fix was always in. She further writes: “To me, there was no doubt Rogers wanted Dad gone, so they backed him into a corner knowing he wouldn’t kneel to their demands. I believe many people knew there was more to the story about Dad’s firing but didn’t bother looking into it and just went with the corporate narrative.” In fact, it should be noted that it was never Cindy’s intention to write a book even though she always had a ringside seat when it came to being near her famous father. But there came a point during this raging controversy when she simply couldn’t take the B.S. any longer. She had to set the record straight. And for that, we owe her a debt of gratitude. Alas, it’s too bad the Cindy Cherry never got to see the fruits of her labour. Cindy passed away last July at the age of 67 after a brief illness. This was very hard on Don. Regardless, her legacy is a book that dispels the lies and myths that the left and the cowards at Rogers concocted when it comes to the Don Cherry saga. We owe her a debt of gratitude for setting the record straight about this great Canadian. Of note, Don Cherry is 91 years old. At this point, we must wonder how long this national treasure will remain with us. We can tell you this much: when Don passes, millions of Canadians will mourn that day. Some speculate Ron will be remembered as a backstabber and a betrayer, whereas Don spoke his mind, told the truth, and stood by his principles even when threatened with career cancellation — which did indeed come to fruition. One final thought: Don Cherry was and remains immensely popular. And once upon a time, he was responsible for the single most watched segment of TV in the nation. He was a cash cow when it came to attracting advertisers and sponsors. Thus, in the final analysis, the really disturbing thing about his unceremonious cancellation is this: if the powers-that-be can cancel Don Cherry, they can cancel anyone.
12:15

Must-read: Cindy Cherry, Don Cherry’s late daughter, tells all in new book about her father and his cancellation Cindy writes that after 38 years of compelling television, her father was cancelled simply for saying “you people love our milk and honey” and the “least you could do” is buy a poppy on Remembrance Day. Hard to believe it’s been more than five years since the most highly viewed segment on Canadian TV was abruptly cancelled and its star maliciously thrown under the bus. All for no valid reason, well, other than cowardly corporate suits bending the knee to a tiny woke mob of leftwing zealots. We speak of Don Cherry, the coach in Coach’s Corner. Whether you loved or loathed Grapes, Coach’s Corner was must-see TV. Again, you either loved Don for his unvarnished honesty and frankness, which is an endangered species in the world of sports broadcasting today. Or you loved to hate Don Cherry, as you would love to hate an entertaining villain cutting promos in the bizarre biosphere that is professional wrestling. The point is, millions of Canadians would tune into Hockey Night in Canada every Saturday night at approximately 7:50 p.m. E.S.T. Coach’s Corner was many things to many people. But it was never, ever boring. We make mention of the cancellation of this cherished slice of Canadian culture thanks to the recent release of a new book entitled, The Don Cherry Story by His Daughter, Cindy Cherry. Cindy Cherry doesn’t waste any time cutting to the chase. Thus, she begins the story at the end of the story. Namely, when her father’s tenure on network TV came to an abrupt and shocking end on November 9, 2019. That first chapter is entitled “Poppygate” – which is a fitting term given that what happened to Don Cherry was indeed scandalous. Cindy writes that after 38 years of compelling television, her father was cancelled simply for saying “you people love our milk and honey” and the “least you could do” is buy a poppy on Remembrance Day. We have viewed that excerpt over and over and over again. We have analyzed Don’s words for any alleged racism or bigotry or xenophobia. And we come up empty every single time. Indeed, Don Cherry was simply speaking the truth. You know it, we know it, everybody knows it. He was bemoaning that not enough people in Canada honour the war dead and our veterans come November 11. This is not conjecture; it’s the indisputable truth. Indeed, on Remembrance Day 2019, the day Don was officially fired by the way, we visited Yonge-Dundas Square in downtown Toronto at 10 a.m. to observe how many people were wearing poppies. In other words, there we were at this busy intersection just 60 minutes before the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month. And we can tell you that less than 5% — yes, less than 5% — of passersby were wearing poppies that day. It was disgraceful, disgusting, and disrespectful. Oh no… was that a little harsh? Is Team Cancel Culture going to come for us now? Yet, the fact that Don Cherry was cancelled for speaking the truth makes for more proof in the pudding that freedom of speech is on thin ice in Canada these days. Due to political correctness, or its new name, “wokeness”, one is forbidden to speak the truth IF the truth hurts. That’s not freedom of speech — that’s censorship. Indeed, Don’s words somehow hurt the feelings of the uber-intolerant left. Or more accurately, these wokesters pretended to suffer from hurt feelings. Finally, these Marxists had some flimsy excuse to derail the career of a common sense patriotic Canadian that they loathed because of… oh, we don’t know… toxic masculinity? And let’s not forget the role of one particular liberal in this saga, namely Ron “The Rat” MacLean. Indeed, if Don’s words were so repugnant, then why didn’t Ron object? Rather, as Cindy Cherry notes, Ron was “bobbing his head in agreement throughout the dialogue, gave Dad the thumbs-up and at the end said, ‘love you for it.’” Furthermore, Cindy notes: “HNiC repeated this Coach’s Corner for their central Canadian viewers. How bad could they have felt it was if they rebroadcasted it?” But no, the cowardly suits at Rogers — caved to the vocal minority and quickly pulled the plug on Coach’s Corner. And when they did, Ron MacLean could’ve and should’ve taken a stand. He could’ve and should’ve said words to the effect of, “Hey, if Don goes, I go.” But then again, that would have made for a principled stand. And second banana rats aren’t all that concerned about principles, not when there’s a juicy six-figure salary on the line. It’s just business, baby. To add insult to injury, MacLean appeared the following Saturday to make a groveling apology. And soon thereafter Hockey Night in Canada went woefully woke in terms of the content aired between periods. It was insufferable and unwatchable. In the days that followed this cancellation, Cindy became further upset about the spin Poppygate was receiving. She writes: “The narrative that Rogers/Sportsnet and Ron put out to the rest of the media was that all Don had to do to keep his job was apologize and he wouldn’t. This is what a lot of the corporate media shills and people on social media jumped on—why didn’t Don just say he’s sorry and then he would have gotten back his job?” But Cindy says that narrative was completely bogus; that the fix was always in. She further writes: “To me, there was no doubt Rogers wanted Dad gone, so they backed him into a corner knowing he wouldn’t kneel to their demands. I believe many people knew there was more to the story about Dad’s firing but didn’t bother looking into it and just went with the corporate narrative.” In fact, it should be noted that it was never Cindy’s intention to write a book even though she always had a ringside seat when it came to being near her famous father. But there came a point during this raging controversy when she simply couldn’t take the B.S. any longer. She had to set the record straight. And for that, we owe her a debt of gratitude. Alas, it’s too bad the Cindy Cherry never got to see the fruits of her labour. Cindy passed away last July at the age of 67 after a brief illness. This was very hard on Don. Regardless, her legacy is a book that dispels the lies and myths that the left and the cowards at Rogers concocted when it comes to the Don Cherry saga. We owe her a debt of gratitude for setting the record straight about this great Canadian. Of note, Don Cherry is 91 years old. At this point, we must wonder how long this national treasure will remain with us. We can tell you this much: when Don passes, millions of Canadians will mourn that day. Some speculate Ron will be remembered as a backstabber and a betrayer, whereas Don spoke his mind, told the truth, and stood by his principles even when threatened with career cancellation — which did indeed come to fruition. One final thought: Don Cherry was and remains immensely popular. And once upon a time, he was responsible for the single most watched segment of TV in the nation. He was a cash cow when it came to attracting advertisers and sponsors. Thus, in the final analysis, the really disturbing thing about his unceremonious cancellation is this: if the powers-that-be can cancel Don Cherry, they can cancel anyone.

Rebel News

231,328 次观看 • 1 年前

The Director of National Intelligence wasn’t there to sip tea and gossip with veteran New York Post journalist Miranda Devine, like the women on The View. They spoke for over an hour, with Tulsi Gabbard pulling back the curtain on some of the most explosive intel stories rattling the media. It started where it needed to: with the Russia Hoax. These were the revelations Gabbard says she oversaw firsthand through her own intelligence agencies. She kicked things off with a BIG bombshell, one that directly implicates top Democrat elites, beyond a shadow of a doubt. Gabbard says a newly declassified appendix to the Durham report proves Hillary Clinton approved the plan to use the Russia Hoax against Donald Trump, and that President Obama was fully briefed. According to Gabbard, the appendix contains direct evidence of efforts to sabotage Trump from the very highest levels of the Democratic Party. “You’ll see a number of quite shocking statements in there, coming from people like, then DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz talking about how—you know, Hillary Clinton’s emails were ‘deleted just in time.’” “References towards some of Hillary Clinton’s most senior advisers saying, hey, let’s use the Russia play, against Trump in order to diminish the attention that’s going to Hillary Clinton’s emails.” “It actually points to statements about how Hillary herself approved one of these plans… to heighten tensions around this Russia hoax… to draw attention away from her and the controversy surrounding her at that time.” And yes, Obama was in the loop. “These documents also show that President Obama was briefed on this before the election… and he talked about how he didn’t want his legacy to be tainted by Hillary Clinton and her controversy.” This is no longer speculation, it’s documented.
2:03

The Director of National Intelligence wasn’t there to sip tea and gossip with veteran New York Post journalist Miranda Devine, like the women on The View. They spoke for over an hour, with Tulsi Gabbard pulling back the curtain on some of the most explosive intel stories rattling the media. It started where it needed to: with the Russia Hoax. These were the revelations Gabbard says she oversaw firsthand through her own intelligence agencies. She kicked things off with a BIG bombshell, one that directly implicates top Democrat elites, beyond a shadow of a doubt. Gabbard says a newly declassified appendix to the Durham report proves Hillary Clinton approved the plan to use the Russia Hoax against Donald Trump, and that President Obama was fully briefed. According to Gabbard, the appendix contains direct evidence of efforts to sabotage Trump from the very highest levels of the Democratic Party. “You’ll see a number of quite shocking statements in there, coming from people like, then DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz talking about how—you know, Hillary Clinton’s emails were ‘deleted just in time.’” “References towards some of Hillary Clinton’s most senior advisers saying, hey, let’s use the Russia play, against Trump in order to diminish the attention that’s going to Hillary Clinton’s emails.” “It actually points to statements about how Hillary herself approved one of these plans… to heighten tensions around this Russia hoax… to draw attention away from her and the controversy surrounding her at that time.” And yes, Obama was in the loop. “These documents also show that President Obama was briefed on this before the election… and he talked about how he didn’t want his legacy to be tainted by Hillary Clinton and her controversy.” This is no longer speculation, it’s documented.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

145,040 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 TPUSA CAUGHT LYING: Leaked Texts DESTROY Kolvet’s “Tarmac Hug” Story – Was on Charlie’s Plane the Whole Time?! 💥 The official narrative of what happened on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated just completely collapsed. Tonight, Candace Owens took to her podcast and released the most explosive evidence to date: the leaked, internal group chat between Turning Point USA executives from September 10th. These messages directly contradict the official story told by TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet regarding his whereabouts, his flights, and the now-infamous "Tarmac Hug" with Erika Kirk. Here is the exact timeline Candace just exposed, and why it proves the syndicate is lying. 📉🕵️‍♂️ Andrew Kolvet, the chief spokesperson for TPUSA, told Candace a very specific story about the day Charlie died. He claimed that he was in Santa Barbara with his wife when the shooting occurred. He claimed he booked a private plane and flew to Provo, Utah three hours later (departing at PM). According to his story, he flew to Provo, stepped off the plane, and immediately "collapsed" into a "boo-hoo crying" hug with Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, on the tarmac. Candace immediately suspected this was a lie. Why would Erika Kirk wait on a tarmac for over an hour for the PR guy to land instead of rushing to the hospital to see her husband? PART 2: THE LEAKED RECEIPTS (THE TRUTH) Candace just dropped the internal TPUSA communications group chat from that exact day. The chat includes Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff (the new COO), and Marina Minas (CMO). The timestamps on these messages completely destroy Kolvet's timeline. PM (Utah Time): Charlie Kirk is shot. PM: Kolvet messages the group, stating they can publicly confirm Charlie has been shot. PM: The team asks Kolvet a crucial PR question about putting someone on Fox News. Kolvet goes completely silent. For nearly two hours, the chief spokesperson for the organization is unreachable during the biggest crisis in their history. PM: Kolvet finally replies. His excuse? "Sorry on the plane, this just loaded." If Kolvet's official story was true, he would have been sitting in Santa Barbara from PM to PM waiting for his flight. He would have had full internet and cell service. Instead, his own text message admits he was "on the plane" and his messages "just loaded" (meaning he was in the air without Wi-Fi) during that exact window. PART 3: WHO WAS REALLY ON THE PLANE? Candace matched Kolvet's "blackout" window ( PM - PM) with the actual flight logs from that day. PM: Charlie Kirk's personal plane leaves Scottsdale, AZ. PM: Charlie Kirk's plane lands in Provo, UT. Andrew Kolvet didn't fly out of Santa Barbara hours later with his wife. The text timestamps suggest Kolvet was already on a plane during that window—highly likely Charlie Kirk's own plane. This means the dramatic story he told Candace about flying in later and having a spontaneous, emotional "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk was a fabricated narrative. PART 4: THE COVER-UP & THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE Because Kolvet was secretly in the air and unreachable, the burden of writing the official corporate death statement for Charlie Kirk fell to Aubrey, a 26-year-old junior employee. Marina Minas (CMO) forced this young staffer to draft the most emotionally traumatizing public statement in the organization's history because the senior PR executive was inexplicably off the grid. (Adding insult to injury, Candace notes that TPUSA leadership later fired Aubrey over a conversation with an Uber driver). THE BOTTOM LINE The Turning Point executives have been caught in a massive, verifiable lie about their movements and communications on the day their founder was assassinated. Why did Andrew Kolvet lie about what plane he was on? Why did he lie about when he flew? And why did he fabricate the story of the "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk? They are hiding something massive about the timeline of September 10th. And Candace Owens just brought the receipts. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL podcast below. 👇
22:59

🚨 TPUSA CAUGHT LYING: Leaked Texts DESTROY Kolvet’s “Tarmac Hug” Story – Was on Charlie’s Plane the Whole Time?! 💥 The official narrative of what happened on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated just completely collapsed. Tonight, Candace Owens took to her podcast and released the most explosive evidence to date: the leaked, internal group chat between Turning Point USA executives from September 10th. These messages directly contradict the official story told by TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet regarding his whereabouts, his flights, and the now-infamous "Tarmac Hug" with Erika Kirk. Here is the exact timeline Candace just exposed, and why it proves the syndicate is lying. 📉🕵️‍♂️ Andrew Kolvet, the chief spokesperson for TPUSA, told Candace a very specific story about the day Charlie died. He claimed that he was in Santa Barbara with his wife when the shooting occurred. He claimed he booked a private plane and flew to Provo, Utah three hours later (departing at PM). According to his story, he flew to Provo, stepped off the plane, and immediately "collapsed" into a "boo-hoo crying" hug with Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, on the tarmac. Candace immediately suspected this was a lie. Why would Erika Kirk wait on a tarmac for over an hour for the PR guy to land instead of rushing to the hospital to see her husband? PART 2: THE LEAKED RECEIPTS (THE TRUTH) Candace just dropped the internal TPUSA communications group chat from that exact day. The chat includes Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff (the new COO), and Marina Minas (CMO). The timestamps on these messages completely destroy Kolvet's timeline. PM (Utah Time): Charlie Kirk is shot. PM: Kolvet messages the group, stating they can publicly confirm Charlie has been shot. PM: The team asks Kolvet a crucial PR question about putting someone on Fox News. Kolvet goes completely silent. For nearly two hours, the chief spokesperson for the organization is unreachable during the biggest crisis in their history. PM: Kolvet finally replies. His excuse? "Sorry on the plane, this just loaded." If Kolvet's official story was true, he would have been sitting in Santa Barbara from PM to PM waiting for his flight. He would have had full internet and cell service. Instead, his own text message admits he was "on the plane" and his messages "just loaded" (meaning he was in the air without Wi-Fi) during that exact window. PART 3: WHO WAS REALLY ON THE PLANE? Candace matched Kolvet's "blackout" window ( PM - PM) with the actual flight logs from that day. PM: Charlie Kirk's personal plane leaves Scottsdale, AZ. PM: Charlie Kirk's plane lands in Provo, UT. Andrew Kolvet didn't fly out of Santa Barbara hours later with his wife. The text timestamps suggest Kolvet was already on a plane during that window—highly likely Charlie Kirk's own plane. This means the dramatic story he told Candace about flying in later and having a spontaneous, emotional "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk was a fabricated narrative. PART 4: THE COVER-UP & THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE Because Kolvet was secretly in the air and unreachable, the burden of writing the official corporate death statement for Charlie Kirk fell to Aubrey, a 26-year-old junior employee. Marina Minas (CMO) forced this young staffer to draft the most emotionally traumatizing public statement in the organization's history because the senior PR executive was inexplicably off the grid. (Adding insult to injury, Candace notes that TPUSA leadership later fired Aubrey over a conversation with an Uber driver). THE BOTTOM LINE The Turning Point executives have been caught in a massive, verifiable lie about their movements and communications on the day their founder was assassinated. Why did Andrew Kolvet lie about what plane he was on? Why did he lie about when he flew? And why did he fabricate the story of the "tarmac hug" with Erika Kirk? They are hiding something massive about the timeline of September 10th. And Candace Owens just brought the receipts. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

30,531 次观看 • 4 个月前