Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

New interview with Momentum Structural Analysis by šŸ“triANGLE INVESTOR. I fully back Michael Oilver's assessment, to 100%. The entire debt and equity market is going to discharge into gold, silver and miners. The financial market is simply DONE! You can see it in the debt market but also everywhere...

56,473 views • 7 days ago •via X (Twitter)

15 Comments

Junior Mining Pro's profile picture
Junior Mining Pro7 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 We've been hearing this story for decades. There's always another mechanism or another move that they will pull to keep the show on the road.

Sebastian's profile picture
Sebastian6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 China will be back in play tonight Demand incoming again they have been offline for almost a week now

Tom's profile picture
Tom7 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 If you've been listening to this guy for the past 9 months, you've lost a shit ton of money!

KallesFarsaā˜¢ļøā›ļø's profile picture
KallesFarsaā˜¢ļøā›ļø7 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123

Destination moon (Objectif lune)'s profile picture
Destination moon (Objectif lune)7 days ago

@capnek123 @Oliver_MSA The riots in the street, the wars, the lunatics in charge… It sure smells like the end of the Roman empire. But that took many years.

Tim Hack's profile picture
Tim Hack7 days ago

Yes, but the Romans didn’t have a market anywhere near as leveraged as ours is today. Besides, the decline has already been underway for at least 20 years, and the amplitudes keep compressing. We’re at the point where the lake’s ecosystem starts to collapse, and from one day to the next, the water starts to smell rotten as the fish float to the surface.

John Smith's profile picture
John Smith6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 Michael mocking again people who bought at +$100. He told them so! What an asshole!

BobRice's profile picture
BobRice7 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 100% pure nonsense .... some people will say anything to get a click or a sub .,.,.. where is that $350 oliver has been predicting since march?? Im surprised any one waste their time reading these tweets

The fisherman's profile picture
The fisherman6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 I’m afraid it is over for atleast this year. I think 2027 will be nicer to us than 2026 have been! šŸ‘Œ

FISIONANDOME āš›ļø's profile picture
FISIONANDOME āš›ļø6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 When? ... It is getting ridiculous

Silver Donut's profile picture
Silver Donut6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 Michael is correct

John Smith's profile picture
John Smith6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 Michael is a frigging idiot!

JPSerino's profile picture
JPSerino6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 How many drown thinking the beach grew before the tsunami struck? Mr Oliver sees the tsunami.

Eli Friedland's profile picture
Eli Friedland7 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 Lmao two bots talking about how PMs will eventually go back up

RoadKill Sorbet's profile picture
RoadKill Sorbet6 days ago

@Oliver_MSA @capnek123 Utter bullshit, hack.

Related Videos

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."

Founder Mode

39,005 views • 8 months ago