正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 NEW: John Fetterman FLIPS THE SCRIPT on Jake Tapper as he tries a gotcha question to try and get Fetterman to second-guess Trump’s Iran strategy Fetterman instead backs the President and says it is “entirely appropriate” to continue confronting Iran. JAKE TAPPER: “Do you worry at all that...

TVNewsNow's profile picture

TV News Now

51,386 subscribers

205,780 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Senator Fetterman CALLS OUT every single Democrat Senator and presidential contender for their total hypocrisy on Iran. FETTERMAN: “I would like to remind people too, every single Democrat running for president and every single Democrat in the Senate said that we can never allow them to acquire nuclear weapons.” “Now if you want to talk about a war crime, Iran is a 47-year-old war crime, what they have continued to behave.” “I as a Democrat supported what President Trump did, to actually call Iran accountable.”
0:28

Senator Fetterman CALLS OUT every single Democrat Senator and presidential contender for their total hypocrisy on Iran. FETTERMAN: “I would like to remind people too, every single Democrat running for president and every single Democrat in the Senate said that we can never allow them to acquire nuclear weapons.” “Now if you want to talk about a war crime, Iran is a 47-year-old war crime, what they have continued to behave.” “I as a Democrat supported what President Trump did, to actually call Iran accountable.”

Overton

49,771 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jake Tapper pressed Senator John Fetterman after the Iran briefing — and got an answer CNN viewers are not going to like. JAKE TAPPER: “Senator, the Trump administration just wrapped up its Iran briefing for all members of Congress.” “Did they give any information that gives you ANY pause about supporting this war?” SENATOR FETTERMAN: “No, nothing that I’ve heard.” “I mean, I think overall, I think the dynamic really is the same.” “And now ever since especially after 10/7 — every single Senator agreed that we can’t ever allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb.” “And now here we’ve had what’s happened, it seems now this has made it virtually impossible to do that at this point.” “And that’s also severely damaged their entire military apparatus.” “So I’d say that I think overall, this has been a very, a big big win for, for global security, especially in the Middle East.”
0:56

Jake Tapper pressed Senator John Fetterman after the Iran briefing — and got an answer CNN viewers are not going to like. JAKE TAPPER: “Senator, the Trump administration just wrapped up its Iran briefing for all members of Congress.” “Did they give any information that gives you ANY pause about supporting this war?” SENATOR FETTERMAN: “No, nothing that I’ve heard.” “I mean, I think overall, I think the dynamic really is the same.” “And now ever since especially after 10/7 — every single Senator agreed that we can’t ever allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb.” “And now here we’ve had what’s happened, it seems now this has made it virtually impossible to do that at this point.” “And that’s also severely damaged their entire military apparatus.” “So I’d say that I think overall, this has been a very, a big big win for, for global security, especially in the Middle East.”

Overton

954,695 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 SEN. FETTERMAN: “WE CAN'T EVER ALLOW IRAN TO ACQUIRE THE BOMB” John Fetterman: "I'm unapologetically very pro Israel. Iran has nuclear ambitions 100%, and we can't ever allow them to acquire a bomb. We absolutely gotta follow [Israel] into this and take out the nuclear facilities. Taking out Iran at this point, that's necessary if you ever have a chance to have any real peace in The Middle East." Source: Fox News
1:45

🇺🇸🇮🇷 SEN. FETTERMAN: “WE CAN'T EVER ALLOW IRAN TO ACQUIRE THE BOMB” John Fetterman: "I'm unapologetically very pro Israel. Iran has nuclear ambitions 100%, and we can't ever allow them to acquire a bomb. We absolutely gotta follow [Israel] into this and take out the nuclear facilities. Taking out Iran at this point, that's necessary if you ever have a chance to have any real peace in The Middle East." Source: Fox News

Mario Nawfal

61,107 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 "Virtually every Democrat I'm aware of says we can never allow Iran to acquire nuclear bombs, and they were a significant risk to America." "I know why they don't say that now because I'm aware that it's very damaging -- as a Democrat -- to agree with the President on anything." U.S. Senator John Fetterman on Kamala Harris' SUDDEN change in tune on Iran. Saturday in America
2:02

🚨 "Virtually every Democrat I'm aware of says we can never allow Iran to acquire nuclear bombs, and they were a significant risk to America." "I know why they don't say that now because I'm aware that it's very damaging -- as a Democrat -- to agree with the President on anything." U.S. Senator John Fetterman on Kamala Harris' SUDDEN change in tune on Iran. Saturday in America

Kayleigh McEnany

591,116 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) says both political parties "should all just be unified" in support of Operation Epic Fury to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. "It wasn't that long ago all the Democrats, you know, rightly said we must never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb," he says. "And here we are at the cusp. Why can't we just empower the president to direct the military?"
3:25

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) says both political parties "should all just be unified" in support of Operation Epic Fury to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. "It wasn't that long ago all the Democrats, you know, rightly said we must never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb," he says. "And here we are at the cusp. Why can't we just empower the president to direct the military?"

CBS News

20,010 次观看 • 2 个月前

CNN’s Kate Bolduan tried to trap Senator Fetterman with a gotcha question on Iran — but he ended up giving an answer she wasn’t expecting. The interview quickly unraveled as Fetterman’s responses REFUSED to fit the network’s narrative. CNN ENDED the segment while Fetterman was still speaking. BOLDUAN: “The Israeli defense minister posted today that…every leader appointed by the Iranian regime will be an unequivocal target for elimination.” “That’s going forward. So that is a US goal going forward?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah just keep killing, killing them until they’re until they’re gone.” “I mean, absolutely. I saw that I’ve read that, that they’re going to target who they ever elect to be their next leader and kill them. Absolutely.” “I fully support it. So that’s that’s what’s entirely appropriate.” “Now they have to decide, are we going to continue for [to] choose now peace and or now we’re going to try to destroy Israel. They really don’t have those capabilities.” “At this point, it’s just empty rhetoric because we all know that Iran is [isn’t] able to really project the kinds of damage.” Bolduan was not happy and fired back: BOLDUAN: “So then who who decides what leader should lead Iran then? If you think that the United States should take part in taking out every leader going forward, if it doesn’t meet the right measure.” Fetterman remained unfazed. FETTERMAN: “Well I mean, hey I’m sorry, I absolutely support killing the leadership of the Iranian [regime]. Absolutely, I absolutely support that.” “I think that’s entirely appropriate until hopefully they’ll pick someone that realizes that they need to live and coexist in peace in the region and stop trying to destroy Israel and destabilize the region.” Bolduan’s frustration was visible as she tried to wrap up: BOLDUAN: “Senator John Fetterman, thank you for your time.” But Fetterman wasn’t done. FETTERMAN: “That’s another thing Democrats say; no one will mourn the death of the Ayatollah. Well, yeah so that that’s just another way saying it’s a good thing that he’s been killed right?” “I’ll call it what it is, I won’t say, well, I won’t weep for him, you know, just call it what it is it’s like it’s a good thing that he’s been erased now and then if they pick another one that wants to do the same thing, erase them too.” Bolduan seemed flustered and issued a clarification before cutting Fetterman off completely. BOLDUAN: “I hear your point. But I have had…every Democrat who’s been on this show that I’ve heard is having two thoughts in their head at once, which is it is good to have the Ayatollah gone, but they do not agree and do not understand the justification of going in now with this war at this moment.” “That is the distinction I’ve heard from other Democrats on the show, but we are now out of time Senator, thank you for your time.” The camera cut away from Fetterman as he was still speaking.
2:34

CNN’s Kate Bolduan tried to trap Senator Fetterman with a gotcha question on Iran — but he ended up giving an answer she wasn’t expecting. The interview quickly unraveled as Fetterman’s responses REFUSED to fit the network’s narrative. CNN ENDED the segment while Fetterman was still speaking. BOLDUAN: “The Israeli defense minister posted today that…every leader appointed by the Iranian regime will be an unequivocal target for elimination.” “That’s going forward. So that is a US goal going forward?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah just keep killing, killing them until they’re until they’re gone.” “I mean, absolutely. I saw that I’ve read that, that they’re going to target who they ever elect to be their next leader and kill them. Absolutely.” “I fully support it. So that’s that’s what’s entirely appropriate.” “Now they have to decide, are we going to continue for [to] choose now peace and or now we’re going to try to destroy Israel. They really don’t have those capabilities.” “At this point, it’s just empty rhetoric because we all know that Iran is [isn’t] able to really project the kinds of damage.” Bolduan was not happy and fired back: BOLDUAN: “So then who who decides what leader should lead Iran then? If you think that the United States should take part in taking out every leader going forward, if it doesn’t meet the right measure.” Fetterman remained unfazed. FETTERMAN: “Well I mean, hey I’m sorry, I absolutely support killing the leadership of the Iranian [regime]. Absolutely, I absolutely support that.” “I think that’s entirely appropriate until hopefully they’ll pick someone that realizes that they need to live and coexist in peace in the region and stop trying to destroy Israel and destabilize the region.” Bolduan’s frustration was visible as she tried to wrap up: BOLDUAN: “Senator John Fetterman, thank you for your time.” But Fetterman wasn’t done. FETTERMAN: “That’s another thing Democrats say; no one will mourn the death of the Ayatollah. Well, yeah so that that’s just another way saying it’s a good thing that he’s been killed right?” “I’ll call it what it is, I won’t say, well, I won’t weep for him, you know, just call it what it is it’s like it’s a good thing that he’s been erased now and then if they pick another one that wants to do the same thing, erase them too.” Bolduan seemed flustered and issued a clarification before cutting Fetterman off completely. BOLDUAN: “I hear your point. But I have had…every Democrat who’s been on this show that I’ve heard is having two thoughts in their head at once, which is it is good to have the Ayatollah gone, but they do not agree and do not understand the justification of going in now with this war at this moment.” “That is the distinction I’ve heard from other Democrats on the show, but we are now out of time Senator, thank you for your time.” The camera cut away from Fetterman as he was still speaking.

Overton

164,562 次观看 • 4 个月前

'BIZZARRE': Senator John Fetterman calls out his fellow Democrats who don't agree with the U.S. and Israel's strike on Iran: "I'd like to remind my colleague over in the House that Iran massacred 30,000 of their own people... This war is not about the Iranian people. It's about this poisonous regime." "I might be a Democrat, but in this specific case, the president is absolutely correct to do these kinds of actions. And now we have Israel's back...and that's why it's entirely the path for peace in that region."
1:00

'BIZZARRE': Senator John Fetterman calls out his fellow Democrats who don't agree with the U.S. and Israel's strike on Iran: "I'd like to remind my colleague over in the House that Iran massacred 30,000 of their own people... This war is not about the Iranian people. It's about this poisonous regime." "I might be a Democrat, but in this specific case, the president is absolutely correct to do these kinds of actions. And now we have Israel's back...and that's why it's entirely the path for peace in that region."

Fox News

1,792,856 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sen. Fetterman says Iran is an “evil regime,” calling out silence on human rights abuses and urging firm action to ensure Tehran never gets a nuclear weapon: “I’m firmly on the side of Israel. I’m firmly on the side of reminding people that Iran is an evil regime. And why are we the only ones talking about the Iranian women who are about to be hanged? Why aren’t people on the left talking about that? Why aren’t they protesting that Iran is about to execute women? They are an evil regime. This has been a 47-year-long problem, and here we are, just over 47 days into this phase, at a very important inflection point in the Middle East. That’s why I’m going to continue to support this, because Iran can never acquire a nuclear bomb. That’s not a radical idea for the Democratic Party . We should be firmly on the side of holding Iran fully accountable.”
1:03

Sen. Fetterman says Iran is an “evil regime,” calling out silence on human rights abuses and urging firm action to ensure Tehran never gets a nuclear weapon: “I’m firmly on the side of Israel. I’m firmly on the side of reminding people that Iran is an evil regime. And why are we the only ones talking about the Iranian women who are about to be hanged? Why aren’t people on the left talking about that? Why aren’t they protesting that Iran is about to execute women? They are an evil regime. This has been a 47-year-long problem, and here we are, just over 47 days into this phase, at a very important inflection point in the Middle East. That’s why I’m going to continue to support this, because Iran can never acquire a nuclear bomb. That’s not a radical idea for the Democratic Party . We should be firmly on the side of holding Iran fully accountable.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

75,076 次观看 • 3 个月前

Senator Fetterman rips America’s allies apart for sitting on the sidelines as Trump demands Iran produce its nuclear dust. Then he turned his fire on Democrats who claim they oppose Iran having a nuke but still vote to tie Trump’s hands in the conflict. FETTERMAN: “And where is the rest of the world countries?” “Where’s our allies saying, yeah, we collectively demand Iran produce their nuclear dust?!” “That’s about peace. That’s about a more stable and more prosperous Middle East.” “Iran can’t ever acquire a nuclear bomb.” “Find a single Democrat that says it’s okay. Well, but voting for that that’s effectively the same thing. But do not say we can’t ever let Iran build a nuclear bomb but refuse to take the heat and to vote for something even though it might be unpopular as a Democrat.”
0:34

Senator Fetterman rips America’s allies apart for sitting on the sidelines as Trump demands Iran produce its nuclear dust. Then he turned his fire on Democrats who claim they oppose Iran having a nuke but still vote to tie Trump’s hands in the conflict. FETTERMAN: “And where is the rest of the world countries?” “Where’s our allies saying, yeah, we collectively demand Iran produce their nuclear dust?!” “That’s about peace. That’s about a more stable and more prosperous Middle East.” “Iran can’t ever acquire a nuclear bomb.” “Find a single Democrat that says it’s okay. Well, but voting for that that’s effectively the same thing. But do not say we can’t ever let Iran build a nuclear bomb but refuse to take the heat and to vote for something even though it might be unpopular as a Democrat.”

Overton

33,355 次观看 • 1 个月前

Democrat Senator John Fetterman confirms the Democrat Party is only worried about opposing everything Donald Trump does Reporter “Who do you think leads the Democratic party today?” John Fetterman “Oh, we don't, we don't have one. I the TDS, I think that's the leader right now. Right now our party is governed by the TDS and now it's made it virtually impossible without being punished as a Democrat to agree something's good or I agree with the other side. — I am literally the only Democrat in America in Congress that I've come across that's saying, I think it's a great thing to break and destroy the Iranian regime. I think it's entirely appropriate to hold them accountable. And what's strange to me that every single Democrat that's run for president and anyone that I know in Congress says, we must never allow them to acquire a nuclear bomb. When that happens, why not celebrate that or acknowledge that I have only witnessed just criticism and this kinds of, this kinds of attack. Like, yeah, you don't have to agree on every single thing, but when a good thing happens, just because it comes from the different party, that that tells me that you're choosing the demand of the base or the party, over country”
1:33

Democrat Senator John Fetterman confirms the Democrat Party is only worried about opposing everything Donald Trump does Reporter “Who do you think leads the Democratic party today?” John Fetterman “Oh, we don't, we don't have one. I the TDS, I think that's the leader right now. Right now our party is governed by the TDS and now it's made it virtually impossible without being punished as a Democrat to agree something's good or I agree with the other side. — I am literally the only Democrat in America in Congress that I've come across that's saying, I think it's a great thing to break and destroy the Iranian regime. I think it's entirely appropriate to hold them accountable. And what's strange to me that every single Democrat that's run for president and anyone that I know in Congress says, we must never allow them to acquire a nuclear bomb. When that happens, why not celebrate that or acknowledge that I have only witnessed just criticism and this kinds of, this kinds of attack. Like, yeah, you don't have to agree on every single thing, but when a good thing happens, just because it comes from the different party, that that tells me that you're choosing the demand of the base or the party, over country”

Wall Street Apes

299,379 次观看 • 3 个月前

Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi suggests that in the U.S.-Iran deal, if the "ultimate objective is to ensure forever that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb," he thinks that "we have cracked that problem." "And I think if we can capture that and build on it, I think a deal is within our reach," he says. He tells Margaret Brennan that "the single most important achievement, I believe, is the agreement that Iran will never, ever have a nuclear material that will create a bomb."
2:03

Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi suggests that in the U.S.-Iran deal, if the "ultimate objective is to ensure forever that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb," he thinks that "we have cracked that problem." "And I think if we can capture that and build on it, I think a deal is within our reach," he says. He tells Margaret Brennan that "the single most important achievement, I believe, is the agreement that Iran will never, ever have a nuclear material that will create a bomb."

Face The Nation

27,979 次观看 • 4 个月前

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins tried to trap Senator Fetterman over his break from Democrats on supporting the Iran operation — but he didn’t bite. Instead, he delivered a reality check on Democrat hypocrisy. COLLINS: “Some of your Democratic colleagues say that they don’t think the administration has a clear end game in Iran.” “Do you have concerns about how they know when to be done with Iran?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I mean I’m very much aware that I’m the only Democrat in the Senate that supports this operation.” “And I’m going to continue to do that.” “And I would remind all of your viewers, whether it was Hillary Clinton when she was running for president or Kamala Harris when she was running just in 24.” “In fact, she actually identified Iran as her top concern you know, she had she called Iran a grave danger.” “And now everyone, every single Democrat agrees that they can never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb.” “And now Donald Trump has done that, made that virtually impossible to achieve their nuclear weapons, and they’ve effectively broke the entire Iranian military apparatus.” “I don’t know why we as Democrats, if we had all those kinds of goals and those kinds of concerns, and now that he’s achieved that, why now we only can criticize that?” “Or they could always make it seem like it’s been a failure, or things are out of control.” “That’s just categorically not true. And I think my hard red line, you know, boots on the ground, that’s when I would get concerned if they start to talk about boots on the ground.” “And now I think even Secretary Hegseth has even said no, no nation building, no nation building.” “No one wants to be a part of that. That was never a part of this missions this far.” “When every single Democrat is, you know, have to sit back and witness Trump developing these kinds of situation or every single Democrat want wanted those things.” “Now, I’m not sure why they can’t just acknowledge that that’s been a positive outcome whether that’s just politics.” “For me it’s just been nothing more than a choice of country over what parts of the base would demand to to condemn or pretend that it’s a terrible situation.”
2:03

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins tried to trap Senator Fetterman over his break from Democrats on supporting the Iran operation — but he didn’t bite. Instead, he delivered a reality check on Democrat hypocrisy. COLLINS: “Some of your Democratic colleagues say that they don’t think the administration has a clear end game in Iran.” “Do you have concerns about how they know when to be done with Iran?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I mean I’m very much aware that I’m the only Democrat in the Senate that supports this operation.” “And I’m going to continue to do that.” “And I would remind all of your viewers, whether it was Hillary Clinton when she was running for president or Kamala Harris when she was running just in 24.” “In fact, she actually identified Iran as her top concern you know, she had she called Iran a grave danger.” “And now everyone, every single Democrat agrees that they can never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb.” “And now Donald Trump has done that, made that virtually impossible to achieve their nuclear weapons, and they’ve effectively broke the entire Iranian military apparatus.” “I don’t know why we as Democrats, if we had all those kinds of goals and those kinds of concerns, and now that he’s achieved that, why now we only can criticize that?” “Or they could always make it seem like it’s been a failure, or things are out of control.” “That’s just categorically not true. And I think my hard red line, you know, boots on the ground, that’s when I would get concerned if they start to talk about boots on the ground.” “And now I think even Secretary Hegseth has even said no, no nation building, no nation building.” “No one wants to be a part of that. That was never a part of this missions this far.” “When every single Democrat is, you know, have to sit back and witness Trump developing these kinds of situation or every single Democrat want wanted those things.” “Now, I’m not sure why they can’t just acknowledge that that’s been a positive outcome whether that’s just politics.” “For me it’s just been nothing more than a choice of country over what parts of the base would demand to to condemn or pretend that it’s a terrible situation.”

Overton

92,449 次观看 • 4 个月前

FETTERMAN: “And I would remind everybody listening right now, the United States never, ever targets civilians. Iran does, including their own citizens. They massacred 35,000 of them just a couple of weeks ago.” Collins tried to interrupt. FETTERMAN: “And the left… please! The left media is much more angry about this hospital, and it is a tragedy. But they didn’t seem as concerned about the Iranians massacring tens of thousands of their young people just a couple of weeks ago.” “So we agree on many parts, but we all disagree that it’s a good thing. Every single other Democrat in the caucus called it negative in terms.” Collins seemed shocked and paused. COLLINS: “Uh… we did cover the protests in Iran extensively here at CNN. They talked a lot about how internally people felt about the regime.” FETTERMAN: “Well, I don’t watch, so I don’t know. I’m talking about other left media.” COLLINS: “I understand. I just wanted to make that clear to our viewers that we did cover that. But just to be clear, you do believe that if the United States was responsible, the Pentagon should acknowledge that they accidentally hit a girl’s school?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I’ve said that. It seems they’ve already acknowledged those things. That letter is largely moot after what’s already come out. And I don’t know what your network talked about, but the New York Times is trying to convince America this has been a disaster. That’s categorically not true.” COLLINS: “I just think it deserves coverage. Given the number of children killed, it obviously matters what happened there. We’ll see what the Pentagon investigation says.” Collins tried to end the segment. COLLINS: “Senator John Fetterman, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you for joining us.” FETTERMAN: “Oh, now, you don’t have to cut me off here.” [chuckles] Collins relented. COLLINS: “Go ahead, Senator, we’re not cutting you off.” FETTERMAN: “Well, you said it’s appropriate to cover it. It is appropriate. It’s a tragedy, absolutely. And now, if we’re on that, it’s entirely appropriate for you to apologize if you implied I don’t think it’s wrong to cover it. That’s not true. I just want to clarify that it seemed like a short shutoff to imply I didn’t want to cover it or that I don’t think it’s appropriate to talk about it.” COLLINS: “I’m not implying that. I just wanted to clarify for everyone watching. Senator, thank you. I always appreciate hearing your thoughts.” FETTERMAN: [Annoyed tone] “Yeah… thank you.”
2:52

FETTERMAN: “And I would remind everybody listening right now, the United States never, ever targets civilians. Iran does, including their own citizens. They massacred 35,000 of them just a couple of weeks ago.” Collins tried to interrupt. FETTERMAN: “And the left… please! The left media is much more angry about this hospital, and it is a tragedy. But they didn’t seem as concerned about the Iranians massacring tens of thousands of their young people just a couple of weeks ago.” “So we agree on many parts, but we all disagree that it’s a good thing. Every single other Democrat in the caucus called it negative in terms.” Collins seemed shocked and paused. COLLINS: “Uh… we did cover the protests in Iran extensively here at CNN. They talked a lot about how internally people felt about the regime.” FETTERMAN: “Well, I don’t watch, so I don’t know. I’m talking about other left media.” COLLINS: “I understand. I just wanted to make that clear to our viewers that we did cover that. But just to be clear, you do believe that if the United States was responsible, the Pentagon should acknowledge that they accidentally hit a girl’s school?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I’ve said that. It seems they’ve already acknowledged those things. That letter is largely moot after what’s already come out. And I don’t know what your network talked about, but the New York Times is trying to convince America this has been a disaster. That’s categorically not true.” COLLINS: “I just think it deserves coverage. Given the number of children killed, it obviously matters what happened there. We’ll see what the Pentagon investigation says.” Collins tried to end the segment. COLLINS: “Senator John Fetterman, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you for joining us.” FETTERMAN: “Oh, now, you don’t have to cut me off here.” [chuckles] Collins relented. COLLINS: “Go ahead, Senator, we’re not cutting you off.” FETTERMAN: “Well, you said it’s appropriate to cover it. It is appropriate. It’s a tragedy, absolutely. And now, if we’re on that, it’s entirely appropriate for you to apologize if you implied I don’t think it’s wrong to cover it. That’s not true. I just want to clarify that it seemed like a short shutoff to imply I didn’t want to cover it or that I don’t think it’s appropriate to talk about it.” COLLINS: “I’m not implying that. I just wanted to clarify for everyone watching. Senator, thank you. I always appreciate hearing your thoughts.” FETTERMAN: [Annoyed tone] “Yeah… thank you.”

Open Source Intel

448,561 次观看 • 4 个月前

This will go down as one of Senator Fetterman’s greatest media appearances. For three straight minutes, he hammered the left-wing media machine for spinning the Iran conflict — and when Kaitlan Collins tried to cut him off, he called her out right to her face: “You don’t have to cut me off here!” FETTERMAN: “And I would remind everybody listening right now, the United States never, EVER targets civilians.” “Iran does, you know, and including their own citizens. And they massacred that 35,000 of them just a couple of weeks ago.” [Collins tried to interrupt] FETTERMAN: “And the left…please! Please!” “The left media is much more angry, you know, about or talking about this hospital. And it is a tragedy. But they didn’t seem to be as concerned about the Iranians massacring tens of thousands of their young people just a couple of weeks ago, too.” “So we agree on many parts of it, but we both disagree…I mean, we all disagree that it’s I think it’s a good thing. And every single other Democrat in the caucus caused it all kinds of in negative terms.” Collins seemed shocked. She took a moment to gather her thoughts. COLLINS: “Uh…we did cover the protests in Iran extensively here at CNN.” “Obviously they said a lot about how internally people felt about the regime. But just to—” FETTERMAN: “Well, I don’t watch so I don’t know, but I’m talking about other left media.” COLLINS: “I understand…I just wanted to make that clear to…to…our viewers that we did cover that.” “But just to be clear, you do believe if the United States was responsible, that the Pentagon should acknowledge that they accidentally hit a girl’s school?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I’ve said that.” “I said it seems that they’ve already acknowledging all those things. I think largely that letter, it was rendered moot at this point after what’s already come out.” “And I don’t know what your network talked about. But what I’m saying is that, you know, whether like it’s the New York Times, they’re making it more and more trying to convince America that this, this has been a disaster or things are out of control.” “And that’s just categorically not true on that.” COLLINS: “I just think it deserves coverage, obviously given the number of children who were killed as a result of it, it obviously matters what happened there.” “We’ll see what the Pentagon investigation says.” Collins immediately tried to end the segment. COLLINS: “Senator John Fetterman, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you for joining us. As always here.” FETTERMAN: “Oh, now, you don’t have to cut me off here.” [Fetterman chuckles] He forced Collins to let him continue his message. The frustrated look on her face told the whole story. COLLINS: “Go ahead Senator, we’re not cutting you off.” FETTERMAN: “Well, you you said something that it’s like it’s appropriate to to cover it.” “It is appropriate to cover it. You know, it’s a tragedy. Absolutely. You know and now if we’re on that, it’s entirely appropriate for you to apologize.” “If you’re implying that I don’t think it’s wrong to cover it, that’s just not true.” “Yes it’s being covered. I just want to clarify that it just seemed like a, like a short shut off there to imply that I didn’t want to carry that or I think it’s entirely appropriate to talk about it.” COLLINS: “Yeah. I’m not implying that. I just wanted to clarify why we’re covering it. For everyone who’s watching. Senator, thank you, I do always appreciate hearing your thoughts.” FETTERMAN: [Annoyed tone] “Yeah…thank you...” And…scene.
2:52

This will go down as one of Senator Fetterman’s greatest media appearances. For three straight minutes, he hammered the left-wing media machine for spinning the Iran conflict — and when Kaitlan Collins tried to cut him off, he called her out right to her face: “You don’t have to cut me off here!” FETTERMAN: “And I would remind everybody listening right now, the United States never, EVER targets civilians.” “Iran does, you know, and including their own citizens. And they massacred that 35,000 of them just a couple of weeks ago.” [Collins tried to interrupt] FETTERMAN: “And the left…please! Please!” “The left media is much more angry, you know, about or talking about this hospital. And it is a tragedy. But they didn’t seem to be as concerned about the Iranians massacring tens of thousands of their young people just a couple of weeks ago, too.” “So we agree on many parts of it, but we both disagree…I mean, we all disagree that it’s I think it’s a good thing. And every single other Democrat in the caucus caused it all kinds of in negative terms.” Collins seemed shocked. She took a moment to gather her thoughts. COLLINS: “Uh…we did cover the protests in Iran extensively here at CNN.” “Obviously they said a lot about how internally people felt about the regime. But just to—” FETTERMAN: “Well, I don’t watch so I don’t know, but I’m talking about other left media.” COLLINS: “I understand…I just wanted to make that clear to…to…our viewers that we did cover that.” “But just to be clear, you do believe if the United States was responsible, that the Pentagon should acknowledge that they accidentally hit a girl’s school?” FETTERMAN: “Yeah, I’ve said that.” “I said it seems that they’ve already acknowledging all those things. I think largely that letter, it was rendered moot at this point after what’s already come out.” “And I don’t know what your network talked about. But what I’m saying is that, you know, whether like it’s the New York Times, they’re making it more and more trying to convince America that this, this has been a disaster or things are out of control.” “And that’s just categorically not true on that.” COLLINS: “I just think it deserves coverage, obviously given the number of children who were killed as a result of it, it obviously matters what happened there.” “We’ll see what the Pentagon investigation says.” Collins immediately tried to end the segment. COLLINS: “Senator John Fetterman, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you for joining us. As always here.” FETTERMAN: “Oh, now, you don’t have to cut me off here.” [Fetterman chuckles] He forced Collins to let him continue his message. The frustrated look on her face told the whole story. COLLINS: “Go ahead Senator, we’re not cutting you off.” FETTERMAN: “Well, you you said something that it’s like it’s appropriate to to cover it.” “It is appropriate to cover it. You know, it’s a tragedy. Absolutely. You know and now if we’re on that, it’s entirely appropriate for you to apologize.” “If you’re implying that I don’t think it’s wrong to cover it, that’s just not true.” “Yes it’s being covered. I just want to clarify that it just seemed like a, like a short shut off there to imply that I didn’t want to carry that or I think it’s entirely appropriate to talk about it.” COLLINS: “Yeah. I’m not implying that. I just wanted to clarify why we’re covering it. For everyone who’s watching. Senator, thank you, I do always appreciate hearing your thoughts.” FETTERMAN: [Annoyed tone] “Yeah…thank you...” And…scene.

Overton

851,084 次观看 • 4 个月前

Megyn Kelly: “It’s stunning to me that the people who voted for the man who said over and over ‘No new wars,’ [and] ‘No war with Iran, no Middle East wars’— and specifically over and over said ‘Iran’ and also said ‘The Democrats are going to get us into a war with Iran’ — that was not a throwaway line. That was a massive part of his campaigning and his promising.” “That those people on a dime were like ‘Yes, we’re pro-war with Iran! Yes, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.’” “We all know that that’s a lie. It’s so obvious that’s a lie to get us into this conflict.”
1:30

Megyn Kelly: “It’s stunning to me that the people who voted for the man who said over and over ‘No new wars,’ [and] ‘No war with Iran, no Middle East wars’— and specifically over and over said ‘Iran’ and also said ‘The Democrats are going to get us into a war with Iran’ — that was not a throwaway line. That was a massive part of his campaigning and his promising.” “That those people on a dime were like ‘Yes, we’re pro-war with Iran! Yes, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.’” “We all know that that’s a lie. It’s so obvious that’s a lie to get us into this conflict.”

RedWave Press

24,446 次观看 • 2 个月前

Democrat Senator John Fetterman TORCHES his party’s hypocrisy on Iran: “Every single Democrat running for President and every single Democrat in the Senate said we can never allow them to acquire a nuclear weapon...I supported what President Trump did...it's been successful."
0:30

Democrat Senator John Fetterman TORCHES his party’s hypocrisy on Iran: “Every single Democrat running for President and every single Democrat in the Senate said we can never allow them to acquire a nuclear weapon...I supported what President Trump did...it's been successful."

RNC Research

35,858 次观看 • 3 个月前

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) CLAPS BACK at former DNC Chair Donna Brazile AFTER she ATTACKS the Trump administration for going to war with Iran with no “strategy” and “no end game.” “Every single Democrat has said we can’t EVER let Iran build a bomb… When Kamala Harris was running for president, she identified that as the top concern for her internationally.” “I absolutely support [the war in Iran].” *Crowd Claps*
1:14

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) CLAPS BACK at former DNC Chair Donna Brazile AFTER she ATTACKS the Trump administration for going to war with Iran with no “strategy” and “no end game.” “Every single Democrat has said we can’t EVER let Iran build a bomb… When Kamala Harris was running for president, she identified that as the top concern for her internationally.” “I absolutely support [the war in Iran].” *Crowd Claps*

RedWave Press

420,862 次观看 • 2 个月前

“In Iran, you have, I would say, at least two important or three important things that we have to be looking at,” says Rafael M. Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency and nominee for the position of UN secretary-general. “First of all is the nuclear material. . . . Second, the other thing that we have been looking at in these negotiations is all the facilities, the nuclear complex. Iran had—has—a very vast nuclear program, which is articulated around a number of places, campuses, places in Tehran and in other places. . . . And the third thing, in case of an agreement of sorts, is what kind of nuclear program Iran would be having in the future.” He concludes that Iran “will have to address all of this if you want to have a comprehensive agreement.” 🔗 Watch the full conversation:
2:34

“In Iran, you have, I would say, at least two important or three important things that we have to be looking at,” says Rafael M. Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency and nominee for the position of UN secretary-general. “First of all is the nuclear material. . . . Second, the other thing that we have been looking at in these negotiations is all the facilities, the nuclear complex. Iran had—has—a very vast nuclear program, which is articulated around a number of places, campuses, places in Tehran and in other places. . . . And the third thing, in case of an agreement of sorts, is what kind of nuclear program Iran would be having in the future.” He concludes that Iran “will have to address all of this if you want to have a comprehensive agreement.” 🔗 Watch the full conversation:

Council on Foreign Relations

17,118 次观看 • 2 个月前

President Trump has been consistent and correct that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. During the Biden Administration, Iran was on a surefire path to a nuclear weapon; thanks to Operation Midnight Hammer, those nuclear ambitions have been reduced to a far fetched dream. While we don’t know how or if Iran will respond, our efforts to rescue Floridians from the war zone in Israel will continue.
3:04

President Trump has been consistent and correct that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. During the Biden Administration, Iran was on a surefire path to a nuclear weapon; thanks to Operation Midnight Hammer, those nuclear ambitions have been reduced to a far fetched dream. While we don’t know how or if Iran will respond, our efforts to rescue Floridians from the war zone in Israel will continue.

Ron DeSantis

371,060 次观看 • 1 年前

“I think it’s an important indication that Congress is starting to rattle and saying look, we’ve got to have a serious conversation about our engagement in [the Iran] conflict and how we use the power of the purse.” Texas Congressman Rep. Chip Roy Press Office reacts to the House passing an Iran War Powers Resolution aimed at limiting President Trump’s ability to wage war in Iran without congressional approval. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
1:31

“I think it’s an important indication that Congress is starting to rattle and saying look, we’ve got to have a serious conversation about our engagement in [the Iran] conflict and how we use the power of the purse.” Texas Congressman Rep. Chip Roy Press Office reacts to the House passing an Iran War Powers Resolution aimed at limiting President Trump’s ability to wage war in Iran without congressional approval. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

32,200 次观看 • 1 个月前