Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

New page, same content as before. Lingam massage session, after 1 hour edging with a beautiful result 💦💦💦 #lingamassage #penismassage #cum #gaymassage #londonmassage #bi #straightcurious

71,266 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A 15-YEAR-OLD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT FOUND A WAY TO SPOT NEW COMPANIES BEFORE MAJOR INVESTORS DID The interviewer walked into the house as Eric finished a business call and asked the person to call back in 30 minutes. Eric was 15. During lockdown, Eric Zhu joined Discord servers where high school students discussed startups and venture deals. He was the only middle school student in those chats. Eric joined a young company as one of its first employees. He then launched his own startup, sold it, and began building Aviato. Investors searched databases for new companies. A startup usually appeared only after its first funding rounds and visible growth. By then, dozens of other funds had seen it. Eric started hunting for signals that appeared before a company entered a database. The Aviato team gathered early signals about new projects and organized them into a search engine for investors. A fund could discover a company before its name started showing up in every venture database. Eric used the same approach as cofounder of his own fund. His team invested at an early stage and took equity. If a larger company acquired the startup or it went public, the fund made money on its stake. At 15, Eric was the cofounder of a fund with roughly $20 million. He also raised more than $1 million for Aviato. To stay near his customers, Eric moved to San Francisco and rented a house with office space for $8,000 a month. He hated the city. The funds had millions for deals. Eric sold them something scarcer: time before everyone else found the same company.

Blaze

14,265 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

My AI made Shopify pages are getting better and better everyday Here’s an example of a Shopify section I built with the reference page and the result on my store 👇 Guide: To make good AI landing pages, you need to use the same method as making good AI UGC or AI product images you have to take something that's already good as a reference for Claude/gemini to analyze and adapt for your product/brand for now you can't adapt full landing pages to your product because the Claude context gets bloated fast and you get poor output. Listicles are the only kind of page you can "one shot" with Claude. But Product pages are another story Analyze an existing page and adapting it to your product section by section is the way to go. The results are 10x better. here's an example (on the video): 1- I found this good product section from im8's product page. I screen-recorded the section on both desktop and mobile, going through the animations to capture the dynamism that a screenshot wouldn’t show. Then I asked Claude Web or Gemini to analyze the recording and produce a very detailed report. Full prompt is on my TG channel, it's quite long. 2- then ask Claude (inside your Shopify brand project folder): "I have a detailed UI/UX specification document for a product page section I want to adapt to my product. Recreate this exactly on Shopify as a section template and adapt it to [name of the product] using the brand guidelines" (paste the result prompt from step 1 ). 3- you will have your section ready after 3-4 minutes. you'll probably have to change a few things. spacing, small visual bugs, price not appearing correctly. it will take you 5 minutes maximum. 4- then you can ask Claude to make 4 different variations of the section using different designs and pick the best one using this prompt: "Create 4 design variations of this section. Keep the content and layout structure identical across all, only vary the visual treatment (color usage, typography hierarchy, spacing, component styling). I will choose the one I like the most." after that you have a pretty good section, and you can do the process again for all sections of the page. The less complex the section, the faster the process will be. note: I know the AI result is not perfect, but it's pretty impressive imo and it will only get better.

Olivier

84,679 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I just built a plugin with Claude Fable 5 that turns Claude Code into a $5,000/mo SEO consultant 🤯 9 skills, one plugin: it connects straight to your Search Console + GA4 data, finds the wins, ships the fixes, and renders a live SEO dashboard that looks like a $200/mo SaaS product. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies sitting on months of Search Console data nobody has time to read. Right now, you probably can't answer: Which keywords are sitting on page 2, one title tag away from page 1, Which pages are bleeding traffic to redirect chains and broken canonicals, Which blog posts rank for commercial terms but never link to a product page. This plugin answers all of it from your live data, then ships the fixes: → Finds your page-2 keywords and ships the fix: new title, headings, content, paste-ready → Clusters every query into a hub-and-spoke content map with the gaps flagged → Drafts posts from your actual search data, not guesses → Writes dev tickets for redirect chains and slow pages, ranked by traffic at risk → Builds the internal links between your blog and your money pages → Flags toxic backlinks and ranks outreach targets → Drops a Monday report with 3 priorities before the client even asks → Renders it all as a one-file HTML dashboard with a 0-100 SEO health score No dashboard staring. No CSV archaeology. No $5K/mo retainer for a PDF. What you get: → Page-2 keywords moved to page 1 → A content calendar that fills itself from data → Dev tickets that write themselves → A live SEO dashboard on command Built 100% in Claude Code with Claude Fable 5. I put the entire build into a step-by-step Playbook: all 8 workflow prompts (including the dashboard), how to turn them into a plugin, and the full Google setup (Including the 2 landmines Google doesn't tell you about). Want access for free? > Like this post > Comment "SEO" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

80,646 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

New body-physics test for the best AI video tools: The newly released Grok Imagine 1.5, the king Seedance 2.0, Google’s “revolutionary super-duper” Gemini Omni Flash, and the old-timer Kling 3.0 Pro. This time I tested how each model handles realistic running motion, body movement, fabric physics, and natural secondary motion. And the result was much less obvious than I expected. Believe it or not, I can’t call Seedance the clear winner this time. Each model got several attempts. - Grok Imagine 1.5: The new version is finally available on the official Grok website, so I could properly test it. Honestly, I didn’t notice a massive improvement over the previous version. Still, the result was acceptable. It produced the most cartoonish image, and the woman runs as if she’s wearing heels, but the body physics were decent enough. It also understood the instructions quickly and followed them correctly. - Kling 3.0 Pro: The old man decided to test my patience. It repeatedly blocked a simple running scene as adult content, then misunderstood the instructions several times. The successful result has the most realistic lighting and frame rate, but the actual body physics look strange. It almost feels like loose foam padding is bouncing inside the leggings. There are also several visible artifacts and unnatural movements. - Gemini Omni Flash: As usual, it gave me that strange slow-motion, low-FPS look that Google models seem to love. But it didn’t censor anything, understood the instructions immediately, and produced a beautiful, realistic result. Surprisingly, this is the output I liked the most in this test. - Seedance 2.0: Seedance also blocked a couple of generations, just like Kling, but eventually produced a strong result. It delivered the most beautiful and visually appealing footage, but I honestly expected better physics. The video looks great, yet I can’t confidently call it the most physically accurate result. - My ranking: 1. Gemini Omni Flash — not perfect, but the best overall result for me 2. Seedance 2.0 — visually stunning, but I preferred Omni’s physics 3. Grok Imagine 1.5 — cartoonish look and strange running, but still acceptable 4. Kling 3.0 Pro — the longest wait, the strangest physics, and the most inconsistent result Do you agree with my ranking? #AIVideo

Alpha Mom

156,463 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This intern 6x'd her company's website traffic with an AI content machine called BlogEO. The big f*cking problem - Blog had almost no real measurement - Insights lived in ~5 places (GSC, Semrush, PostHog, Sanity, prior run snapshots) so nobody joined the data - ~70% of traffic came from 14 posts; ~50% from just 5 - Top SEO posts were often invisible to LLMs (AEO gap) Step 1: Run the AI audit - Pulls those five sources into one view - Content hygiene scan first: broken links, positioning drift, deprecated products - Broken-link fixes use Browserbase's fetch API to find the right replacement - Broken links + missing SEO fields can auto-publish (no human gate) - Scores every post into a ranking / opportunity queue - Flags the top ~15 for deeper fact-check + SEO verification - Drafts surgical edits (small, intentional) and stores each suggestion - Edits stay small on purpose. Most posts were handwritten; don’t paste AI voice over human voice - High-leverage changes: SEO title, meta description, swap a link - 28-day cooldown after changes so GSC has time to catch up (no thrashing the same post) Step 1b: Score post opportunities • Unit of opportunity = clicks • Click recovery: if clicks fell hard vs the last ~28 days, that lost volume is opportunity. Real click loss beats any estimate and jumps the queue. • CTR gap: compare your CTR at a given position to what page-one / peers get at that same spot. Gap × impressions ≈ clicks you’re leaving on the table. (Alex’s example: position 9 averages ~5% CTR; you’re at 1% → the 4-pt delta is the opportunity.) • Rank upside: if you’re on page 2/3, estimate clicks if you moved to page 1 / to the average for that better position. (Her example: post at 9.4 with a pink-dot underperform → ~7,400 click opportunity if it hit the average for that position.) • Queue, then spend: every post gets a cheap score; only the top ~15 get the expensive fact-check / deep SEO pass (token control). Near-invisible / irrelevant queries don’t score high on purpose. Step 3: Avoid AI slop - New posts aren’t a firehose ideas surface as drafts, ~once a week - Ignore / skip is a first-class option if the query isn’t worth owning - Quality gate before anything ships - Slack card shows who approved and who published — accountability stays with a person - Human pride > “we shipped another AI blog” Step 4: Run the full blog machine - Weekly cadence in Slack: Monday = content generation, Tuesday = audit (plus on-demand “audit this page now”) - Agent (BB) has skills: audit, strategy, writing, generate...always drafts suggestions first - Agent has no write path to live content until a human clicks - Slack cards: Approve / Edit / Skip / Discard → only then does it hit the CMS - Approved edits + outcomes land in internal DBs (including what never shipped) - Near-miss queries (show up in search, no targeted page) feed the generator side The results Search impressions: +5.8x Page-one queries: +9.8x Avg blog position: page 2 → page 1 Massive shoutout to harsehaj ⋆˙⟡ for the amazing internship project & masterclass in AI-powered AEO/SEO!

Alex Lieberman

33,210 просмотров • 16 дней назад