Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

NEW RESEARCH: WithSecure’s r0zetta details several interesting prompt engineering tricks that could be used to creatively abuse GPT-3, forcing people to become even more skeptical about what they read>> #AI #GPT3 #MachineLearning #cybersecurity #infosec

39,429 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

6 Kommentare

Profilbild von WithSecure™
WithSecure™vor 3 Jahren

When something gets a lot of engagement on social media, it starts to feel more legitimate. This is what’s called social validation. To simulate social validation, we asked GPT-3 to generate some social media messages and then reply to them over and over.

Profilbild von WithSecure™
WithSecure™vor 3 Jahren

Nearly universal access to models that deliver human-sounding text in seconds presents a turning point in human history. “We are all Blade Runners now to some degree, trying to figure out if the intelligence we’re dealing with is ‘real,’ or artificial.” -@r0zetta

Profilbild von WithSecure™
WithSecure™vor 3 Jahren

"WithSecure has released a comprehensive account of its experiments with GPT-3, which ranges from the humorous – for instance, a recounting of an awkward trip to the bathroom in the style of Scots vernacular author Irvine Welsh – to the chilling...."

Profilbild von WithSecure™
WithSecure™vor 3 Jahren

"The bottom line, according to the researchers, is that large language models give criminals better tools to create targeted communications in their cyberattacks... " #GPT3

Profilbild von WithSecure™
WithSecure™vor 3 Jahren

How do feel about text-generation bots powered by AI, such as ChatGPT?

Profilbild von WithSecure™
WithSecure™vor 3 Jahren

FYI: It's early but so far those on LinkedIn is more excited about GPT-3 than you on Twitter.

Ähnliche Videos

AI models currently have a 50% chance of doing something that takes a human expert one hour. This doubles every 7 months. In 2 years? They could automate full workdays. In 4 years? A full month. I discuss the most important graph in AI today with Beth Barnes, the CEO of METR, which uncovered this rule of AI progress. Her bottom line: "It really doesn't seem like 2 years would be surprising for recursively self-improving AI." Beth also explains: where company safety testing fails, why there are no true closed-weight models, AI undermines leading powers, why she's come around on open weighting, and why models might be about to start playing dumb much more often. Enjoy! Available on the 80,000 Hours Podcast in all apps. Links below. 1:51 Can we see AI scheming in the chain of thought? 12:50 Alignment faking 17:33 We have to test models before they're even used inside AI companies 31:56 Each 7 months models can do tasks twice as long 51:31 METR's research finds AIs are solid at AI research already 58:18 AI may turn out to be strong at novel and creative research 1:07:55 Recursively self-improving AI might even be here in two years 1:14:29 Could evaluations backfire? 1:39:55 Do we need external auditors doing AI safety tests? 1:54:09 Why not work at AI companies 2:08:40 The new more dire situation has forced changes to METR's strategy 2:21:49 Overrated: Interpretability research 2:32:55 Overrated: Major AI companies' contributions to safety research 2:39:15 Could we ban using AI to enhance AI, or is that just naive? 2:45:31 Open-weighting models is often good 2:50:22 What we can learn about AGI from the nuclear arms race 3:10:43 AI is more like bioweapons because it undermines the leading power 3:42:09 What research METR plans to do next

Rob Wiblin

93,669 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr