Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

New sexy Aussie boy gets his prostate orgasm just how he likes it! What a hottie👆🎯 #seatedgloryhole #gloryhole #gloryholes #gaygloryhole #prostateexam #prostatemassage #prostateorgasm #fingerhim #gaybj #bj #smoothtwink #twink #bottom #tickletheprostate EdgeHim @Menwhoswallow

Seated GH 200K TOP 1% OF

205,802 subscribers

388,253 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #seatedgloryhole #gloryhole #gloryholes #gaygloryhole #prostateexam #prostatemassage #prostateorgasm #fingerhim #gaybj #bj #smoothtwink #twink #bottom #tickletheprostate

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Sylus Improvised Flow thoughts: -WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT WASN’T AN AU?!! 😭 -I signed up for sexy Idol AU times but was hit right in the feels. This story made me cry twice 😭 -Interstellar Arena mention and tie in with Main Story (this happens after Death & Rebirth omg) -More feather symbolism and MC asking Sylus how long was he alone but Sylus not answering omg 😭 -Sylus saying he would steal a new Sun for MC if it came to that; he would build a whole new universe for her if she so wished wtf 😭 -One of the most beautiful lines ever in this game “Good Morning” 😭 -Third myth foreshadows everywhere lol -What do you MEAN Sylus just knows how to dance like that LMAO? And putting a private show for MC okay?!!! -The kiss scene animation just keeps getting better and better -“I hope you remember every part of tonight. Not just here but here as well” as his hand gets closer to her…….?!! 🤯 -Badass trigger badass with a gun

Sylus Improvised Flow thoughts: -WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT WASN’T AN AU?!! 😭 -I signed up for sexy Idol AU times but was hit right in the feels. This story made me cry twice 😭 -Interstellar Arena mention and tie in with Main Story (this happens after Death & Rebirth omg) -More feather symbolism and MC asking Sylus how long was he alone but Sylus not answering omg 😭 -Sylus saying he would steal a new Sun for MC if it came to that; he would build a whole new universe for her if she so wished wtf 😭 -One of the most beautiful lines ever in this game “Good Morning” 😭 -Third myth foreshadows everywhere lol -What do you MEAN Sylus just knows how to dance like that LMAO? And putting a private show for MC okay?!!! -The kiss scene animation just keeps getting better and better -“I hope you remember every part of tonight. Not just here but here as well” as his hand gets closer to her…….?!! 🤯 -Badass trigger badass with a gun

☆オードリーAudrey☆

16,227 views • 10 months ago

🚨WOW!!! A little girl in Kentucky was given 3 DAYS TO LIVE, her mom was told to call the funeral home and start making arrangements. Then a 10-year-old boy in Ohio was hit by a car... and his liver saved her life. Now, 20 years later, she is MARRYING HIS LITTLE BROTHER. ❤️ Her name is Brooklyn Dotson. She's 24, from Letcher County, Kentucky. She was diagnosed with a rare liver condition when she was just a few months old. Doctors gave her 3 days. Her mother refused to give up on her. In 2003, at Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Brooklyn got a new liver. She has no memory of it. She was a baby. That liver came from a 10-year-old boy in Dayton, Ohio named Michael. Michael was the kind of kid who would do ANYTHING for anybody. He taught his little brother how to ride a bike. He sat with him through his surgeries. His family says he was more mature than a boy that age had any business being. And somewhere along the way, as a CHILD, Michael told his family he wanted to be an organ donor. Then he was hit by a car and killed. And his parents, in the worst moment of their entire lives, honored what their little boy asked for. His heart. His eyes. His lungs. His kidneys. And his liver went to a baby girl in Kentucky. Now here's where God shows up. That little brother? The one Michael taught to ride a bike? His name is Noah Waters. And decades later, he and Brooklyn became friends. Then best friends. Then they were FaceTiming 8 hours a day. Brooklyn's own mom is the one who finally told Noah: I think Brooke likes you. He drove down that same weekend. They're getting married THIS SEPTEMBER in Monticello, Kentucky, on a hill overlooking Lake Cumberland. Noah on his brother: "my brother was gonna save my wife's life 20 years later." He had no idea. NONE. And when Brooklyn talks about honoring Michael's memory the best way she knows how, Noah just says: And you get his last name. SHE IS GOING TO CARRY HIS NAME!!! 😭 The woman that boy saved is about to become a Waters. Noah's cousin Beth is the one who called the news station, because she knew this story had to be told. She says God always had a plan, for them to be together and to carry the family's legacy forward through Michael. She believes Michael had a hand in getting them together. I believe it too. Brooklyn says people keep telling them they should have a Hallmark movie. Noah says they're just regular people who met in an extraordinary way. Regular people, brother? A 10-year-old boy said YES to something most grown adults never even fill out on their license... and that YES is walking down an aisle in September wearing a wedding dress. One little boy in Ohio. One grieving family who kept their son's word. One mother in Kentucky who wouldn't call the funeral home. Michael's story started with a "yes." It ends with an "I do." What an INCREDIBLE love story ❤️❤️❤️

🚨WOW!!! A little girl in Kentucky was given 3 DAYS TO LIVE, her mom was told to call the funeral home and start making arrangements. Then a 10-year-old boy in Ohio was hit by a car... and his liver saved her life. Now, 20 years later, she is MARRYING HIS LITTLE BROTHER. ❤️ Her name is Brooklyn Dotson. She's 24, from Letcher County, Kentucky. She was diagnosed with a rare liver condition when she was just a few months old. Doctors gave her 3 days. Her mother refused to give up on her. In 2003, at Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Brooklyn got a new liver. She has no memory of it. She was a baby. That liver came from a 10-year-old boy in Dayton, Ohio named Michael. Michael was the kind of kid who would do ANYTHING for anybody. He taught his little brother how to ride a bike. He sat with him through his surgeries. His family says he was more mature than a boy that age had any business being. And somewhere along the way, as a CHILD, Michael told his family he wanted to be an organ donor. Then he was hit by a car and killed. And his parents, in the worst moment of their entire lives, honored what their little boy asked for. His heart. His eyes. His lungs. His kidneys. And his liver went to a baby girl in Kentucky. Now here's where God shows up. That little brother? The one Michael taught to ride a bike? His name is Noah Waters. And decades later, he and Brooklyn became friends. Then best friends. Then they were FaceTiming 8 hours a day. Brooklyn's own mom is the one who finally told Noah: I think Brooke likes you. He drove down that same weekend. They're getting married THIS SEPTEMBER in Monticello, Kentucky, on a hill overlooking Lake Cumberland. Noah on his brother: "my brother was gonna save my wife's life 20 years later." He had no idea. NONE. And when Brooklyn talks about honoring Michael's memory the best way she knows how, Noah just says: And you get his last name. SHE IS GOING TO CARRY HIS NAME!!! 😭 The woman that boy saved is about to become a Waters. Noah's cousin Beth is the one who called the news station, because she knew this story had to be told. She says God always had a plan, for them to be together and to carry the family's legacy forward through Michael. She believes Michael had a hand in getting them together. I believe it too. Brooklyn says people keep telling them they should have a Hallmark movie. Noah says they're just regular people who met in an extraordinary way. Regular people, brother? A 10-year-old boy said YES to something most grown adults never even fill out on their license... and that YES is walking down an aisle in September wearing a wedding dress. One little boy in Ohio. One grieving family who kept their son's word. One mother in Kentucky who wouldn't call the funeral home. Michael's story started with a "yes." It ends with an "I do." What an INCREDIBLE love story ❤️❤️❤️

Matt Van Swol

793,990 views • 29 days ago

Asmongold cracks up at the double standards of Hasan's racism vs his own "He was talking about me wanting to support Israel bc I looked like a Jew..do I have motion? Like bro it's one thing to copy Nick Fuentes's f'in outfit..now ur also copying his hair, and ur trying to do Gen Z speak as well like unironically...ur 35 yo, just stop man" "Can u imagine how mad he would be if I said oh well, the reason why he likes Hamas is bc he looks like them..ur saying that I support Israel bc I look like a Jew...and I'm the one who gets banned..how do I look like a Jew btw? Can u imagine how much he'd be crying if I started saying..well he looks like one of those terr*rists so that's why he's defending them" "Oh the implication also is that no only do I look like a Jew, but Jews are u-gly..look at him, he looks like a Jew! Look we photoshopped him with the Jew hair..he's implying that ur inbread (read from chat)..why not both? (plays Cenk Uygur clip about his grandparents being cousins)" "Maybe I should come up w like 5 different new slurs for Arabs, and I'll see how much he cries about it on Twitter. These ppl are so unbelievably racist..racism is low IQ btw, Euro-id, Amero-id, he looks like a Jew..racism is low IQ? U know what, maybe I agree"

Asmongold cracks up at the double standards of Hasan's racism vs his own "He was talking about me wanting to support Israel bc I looked like a Jew..do I have motion? Like bro it's one thing to copy Nick Fuentes's f'in outfit..now ur also copying his hair, and ur trying to do Gen Z speak as well like unironically...ur 35 yo, just stop man" "Can u imagine how mad he would be if I said oh well, the reason why he likes Hamas is bc he looks like them..ur saying that I support Israel bc I look like a Jew...and I'm the one who gets banned..how do I look like a Jew btw? Can u imagine how much he'd be crying if I started saying..well he looks like one of those terr*rists so that's why he's defending them" "Oh the implication also is that no only do I look like a Jew, but Jews are u-gly..look at him, he looks like a Jew! Look we photoshopped him with the Jew hair..he's implying that ur inbread (read from chat)..why not both? (plays Cenk Uygur clip about his grandparents being cousins)" "Maybe I should come up w like 5 different new slurs for Arabs, and I'll see how much he cries about it on Twitter. These ppl are so unbelievably racist..racism is low IQ btw, Euro-id, Amero-id, he looks like a Jew..racism is low IQ? U know what, maybe I agree"

yeet

50,558 views • 7 days ago

BREAKING: New details emerge in the Karmelo Anthony case as he seeks a new trial for murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf. Fox News reports that Anthony, sentenced to 35 years in June after being convicted of stabbing Austin to death at a track meet in April 2025, is pushing for a retrial. A Texas judge is reviewing the request, with a Monday deadline. The original judge was recused over impartiality concerns. Austin’s father, Jeff Metcalf, isn’t backing down: “If he gets one, great. The facts are still the same. We had 35 witnesses, if we have to call 35 we will. He brought a knife to a track meet, not supposed to, went to a tent where he did not belong, harassed a lady about 15 times, got pushed in the shoulder and immediately stabbed somebody in the chest and killed my son. No matter what judge is presiding or what lawyer is presenting the case, the facts are the facts.” Now the real story is coming out. Prosecutors say Anthony was spiraling that day. His girlfriend had just broken up with him that morning. She told an assistant principal he was stalking her. Hours before the track meet, Anthony texted someone: “I’m low key on the verge.” He had a documented history of fighting, enough that his parents sent him to a special program at LSU for kids who “cannot keep their hands to themselves.” He was also obsessed with knives and guns and had fantasized about stabbing someone. Investigators found a text where he wrote: “when I stab somebody I am going to lick the blood off the blade.” None of this was presented to the jury. Both the prosecution and defense had a “gentleman’s agreement” to keep character evidence out and focus only on what happened under the tent. The defense is now claiming this agreement effectively pressured Anthony not to testify, because prosecutors allegedly told him that if he took the stand the character evidence would come in. The lead prosecutor says both Anthony and his original attorneys fully agreed to the deal, and only complained after they lost. The defense also wants to drag in an old incident from Austin’s sixth-grade years involving racist graffiti. Legal analysts point out that has almost no relevance unless they can prove Anthony somehow knew about it and it affected his state of mind that day. The damning texts and history about Anthony, by contrast, go directly to motive, intent, and whether this was self-defense or a calculated killing. Bottom line: Karmelo Anthony brought a knife to a high school track meet, escalated a confrontation, and stabbed a 17-year-old boy in the chest. The new details only make his actions look worse, not better. The facts have not changed. Justice for Austin Metcalf should not be re-litigated because the defense now regrets the deal they made.

BREAKING: New details emerge in the Karmelo Anthony case as he seeks a new trial for murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf. Fox News reports that Anthony, sentenced to 35 years in June after being convicted of stabbing Austin to death at a track meet in April 2025, is pushing for a retrial. A Texas judge is reviewing the request, with a Monday deadline. The original judge was recused over impartiality concerns. Austin’s father, Jeff Metcalf, isn’t backing down: “If he gets one, great. The facts are still the same. We had 35 witnesses, if we have to call 35 we will. He brought a knife to a track meet, not supposed to, went to a tent where he did not belong, harassed a lady about 15 times, got pushed in the shoulder and immediately stabbed somebody in the chest and killed my son. No matter what judge is presiding or what lawyer is presenting the case, the facts are the facts.” Now the real story is coming out. Prosecutors say Anthony was spiraling that day. His girlfriend had just broken up with him that morning. She told an assistant principal he was stalking her. Hours before the track meet, Anthony texted someone: “I’m low key on the verge.” He had a documented history of fighting, enough that his parents sent him to a special program at LSU for kids who “cannot keep their hands to themselves.” He was also obsessed with knives and guns and had fantasized about stabbing someone. Investigators found a text where he wrote: “when I stab somebody I am going to lick the blood off the blade.” None of this was presented to the jury. Both the prosecution and defense had a “gentleman’s agreement” to keep character evidence out and focus only on what happened under the tent. The defense is now claiming this agreement effectively pressured Anthony not to testify, because prosecutors allegedly told him that if he took the stand the character evidence would come in. The lead prosecutor says both Anthony and his original attorneys fully agreed to the deal, and only complained after they lost. The defense also wants to drag in an old incident from Austin’s sixth-grade years involving racist graffiti. Legal analysts point out that has almost no relevance unless they can prove Anthony somehow knew about it and it affected his state of mind that day. The damning texts and history about Anthony, by contrast, go directly to motive, intent, and whether this was self-defense or a calculated killing. Bottom line: Karmelo Anthony brought a knife to a high school track meet, escalated a confrontation, and stabbed a 17-year-old boy in the chest. The new details only make his actions look worse, not better. The facts have not changed. Justice for Austin Metcalf should not be re-litigated because the defense now regrets the deal they made.

Gunther Eagleman™

46,123 views • 11 days ago

🚨 Dave Smith’s DSA Analysis Falls Apart Immediately Libertarians, you don’t have to agree with me on everything. But if you want serious DSA coverage based on what the organization is actually saying and doing internally, please consider my work. Dave Smith’s DSA analysis is not good, which is shocking given how confidently he talks about it, the fact that he is a libertarian, and his ties to New York. He gets a few things right, but this is not high-level analysis of the socialist left. The most revealing part is that Dave seems unsure whether Zohran Mamdani is actually a democratic socialist or meaningfully connected to DSA. Zohran is one of DSA’s clearest success stories, someone recruited, trained, elevated, and elected through the movement. He is the poster boy for DSA and one of the clearest examples of DSA’s project to build power through the Democratic ballot line. Dave treats all of this like little-d little-s “democratic socialism,” as if these are just welfare liberals who are not really socialists and occasionally latch onto whatever issue is trending. But DSA is not randomly latching onto wokeism, Bernie, Gaza, Iran, or Lebanon. These positions flow from a worldview. When DSA “latches onto” something, whether it is anti-ICE activism, Gaza, or labor militancy, it is usually because the organization wants to operate inside the broader movement space and pull those fights into its socialist project. Libertarians should be the people most interested in getting this right. If your opponents are openly trying to put government, unions, and socialist institutions into every corner of economic and civic life while building a democratic socialist republic, you should probably know what they actually believe.

🚨 Dave Smith’s DSA Analysis Falls Apart Immediately Libertarians, you don’t have to agree with me on everything. But if you want serious DSA coverage based on what the organization is actually saying and doing internally, please consider my work. Dave Smith’s DSA analysis is not good, which is shocking given how confidently he talks about it, the fact that he is a libertarian, and his ties to New York. He gets a few things right, but this is not high-level analysis of the socialist left. The most revealing part is that Dave seems unsure whether Zohran Mamdani is actually a democratic socialist or meaningfully connected to DSA. Zohran is one of DSA’s clearest success stories, someone recruited, trained, elevated, and elected through the movement. He is the poster boy for DSA and one of the clearest examples of DSA’s project to build power through the Democratic ballot line. Dave treats all of this like little-d little-s “democratic socialism,” as if these are just welfare liberals who are not really socialists and occasionally latch onto whatever issue is trending. But DSA is not randomly latching onto wokeism, Bernie, Gaza, Iran, or Lebanon. These positions flow from a worldview. When DSA “latches onto” something, whether it is anti-ICE activism, Gaza, or labor militancy, it is usually because the organization wants to operate inside the broader movement space and pull those fights into its socialist project. Libertarians should be the people most interested in getting this right. If your opponents are openly trying to put government, unions, and socialist institutions into every corner of economic and civic life while building a democratic socialist republic, you should probably know what they actually believe.

Stu Smith

13,395 views • 2 months ago

A guy with sexy ENERGY is far more captivating to a girl than a guy who just looks good or is rich or tall. Girls CHASE this guy. But girls are terrible at describing what it actually is that is attracting them to a guy like this. So, let me lay out the formula for you for understanding it. We can go back to the Year 2000 movie THE TAO OF STEVE for the answer. The movie (based on a real life guy) is about an overweight male kindergarten teacher who smashes a ton of women by using this magic ‘sexy energy’ formula: 1️⃣ BE DESIRELESS. Unlike the average guy, who approaches a woman needing or wanting something, a guy with Tao of Steve energy wants NOTHING from her. He is simply just there to socialize, shoot the breeze, and have a good time. Rather than want anything from her, he is actually OFFERING something: good vibes. There is nothing from her he wants or needs. 2️⃣ BE EXCELLENT. No girl wants a guy who is average at EVERYTHING. Whatever you are NOT average at, find a way to showcase that around women. The guy from Tao of Steve expounds on philosophical concepts that he finds interesting. He gives women new insights and things to think about (this is actually not very hard if you study philosophy a bit. All women find it interesting, but few women study it deeply). If you have great social skills, showcase them. If you have athletic skills or artistic skills, showcase them. Find what’s excellent about you and SHOW IT. 3️⃣ BE GONE. Finally, Duncan North (the Tao of Steve guy) never hangs around too long. He never overstays his welcome. You know how if you hang out with someone too long, you start to get that feeling of, “Okay, well, something should happen, it’s getting kind of stale/awkward now?” You simply leave BEFORE you reach that point. Exit on a high point. Leave her wanting MORE from you. You’re the guy who’s excellent and who needs/wants nothing from her whatsoever. And now you’re leaving. But she doesn’t want you to go! The next time she sees you, she is going to work even harder to keep you around! That’s the Tao of Steve. If you do THAT with girls, you will run circles around the good-looking guys and tall guys with them. No, you do not have to be clownishly energetic. No, you do not have to be Mr. Funny Jokes or The Entertainer. Those guys are NEEDY. They NEED something (her attention, her approval). They violate the first tenet of the Tao of Steve. You just need to be the cool, excellent guy who doesn’t actually need anything from her, just drops whatever value he has to drop, then gets gone before she’s had her fill. Women WILL chase you when you are this guy. They will value you far more highly than the guy whose only value is his chiseled jaw line or his 6-figure income.

A guy with sexy ENERGY is far more captivating to a girl than a guy who just looks good or is rich or tall. Girls CHASE this guy. But girls are terrible at describing what it actually is that is attracting them to a guy like this. So, let me lay out the formula for you for understanding it. We can go back to the Year 2000 movie THE TAO OF STEVE for the answer. The movie (based on a real life guy) is about an overweight male kindergarten teacher who smashes a ton of women by using this magic ‘sexy energy’ formula: 1️⃣ BE DESIRELESS. Unlike the average guy, who approaches a woman needing or wanting something, a guy with Tao of Steve energy wants NOTHING from her. He is simply just there to socialize, shoot the breeze, and have a good time. Rather than want anything from her, he is actually OFFERING something: good vibes. There is nothing from her he wants or needs. 2️⃣ BE EXCELLENT. No girl wants a guy who is average at EVERYTHING. Whatever you are NOT average at, find a way to showcase that around women. The guy from Tao of Steve expounds on philosophical concepts that he finds interesting. He gives women new insights and things to think about (this is actually not very hard if you study philosophy a bit. All women find it interesting, but few women study it deeply). If you have great social skills, showcase them. If you have athletic skills or artistic skills, showcase them. Find what’s excellent about you and SHOW IT. 3️⃣ BE GONE. Finally, Duncan North (the Tao of Steve guy) never hangs around too long. He never overstays his welcome. You know how if you hang out with someone too long, you start to get that feeling of, “Okay, well, something should happen, it’s getting kind of stale/awkward now?” You simply leave BEFORE you reach that point. Exit on a high point. Leave her wanting MORE from you. You’re the guy who’s excellent and who needs/wants nothing from her whatsoever. And now you’re leaving. But she doesn’t want you to go! The next time she sees you, she is going to work even harder to keep you around! That’s the Tao of Steve. If you do THAT with girls, you will run circles around the good-looking guys and tall guys with them. No, you do not have to be clownishly energetic. No, you do not have to be Mr. Funny Jokes or The Entertainer. Those guys are NEEDY. They NEED something (her attention, her approval). They violate the first tenet of the Tao of Steve. You just need to be the cool, excellent guy who doesn’t actually need anything from her, just drops whatever value he has to drop, then gets gone before she’s had her fill. Women WILL chase you when you are this guy. They will value you far more highly than the guy whose only value is his chiseled jaw line or his 6-figure income.

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

88,439 views • 7 months ago

The Carney Files: Exposing the new globalist golden boy, Mark Carney From his connections to Epstein associates, his role at Brookfield Asset Management, and the World Economic Forum, Canadians have a lot to learn about globalist golden boy, Mark Carney. The fix is in. Canada’s next prime minister was just anointed behind closed doors in a questionable leadership race. Trudeau's usefulness has run its course. He's not cute anymore. The elites have moved on, and they’ve chosen their new golden boy: Mark Carney. That’s why we’re launching The Carney Files — your one-stop shop for everything the establishment and the legacy media don’t want you to know about the next to sit on the Liberal throne. Because while the mainstream press is polishing their puff pieces, we’re doing what they refuse to — exposing the real Mark Carney. And trust me, there’s a lot to expose. This isn’t just some mild-mannered banker turned politician. Carney was the man whispering in Trudeau's ear for the last five years. All those things the Liberals did to us? That was him — lockdowns; tax hikes; overspending; electric vehicle mandates. Carney is Trudeau 2.0, but more dangerous. He’s the handpicked globalist successor to Trudeau, a man whose loyalties don’t lie with Canada, but with the unelected power brokers who pull the strings from Davos at the World Economic Forum, and the UN. Remember? He's a self-described European, with three citizenships. We’re talking about a man who has spent his entire career pushing the very policies that have gutted the middle class — from his time at the Bank of Canada, to his role at the Bank of England, to his non-stop advocacy for extreme carbon taxation under the guise of “climate action.” And let’s not forget his cozy connections to some very unsavory characters. Does Ghislaine Maxwell ring a bell? Oh yeah, Carney's got tangential ties to her, too. The very same woman who helped Jeffrey Epstein run one of the most disgusting criminal operations in modern history. But good luck hearing that on CBC or CTV. They won’t touch it. Too busy protecting their next meal ticket. And then there’s his manifesto, Values — a book that reads less like a personal philosophy and more like an instruction manual for a globalist coup. In it, Carney lays out his plan for a so-called “moral economy,” where unelected bureaucrats, not free markets, dictate how you live, how you work, and how much you pay for basic necessities. It’s a carbon tax fever dream wrapped in Orwellian doublespeak. But wait, there’s more. Carney has his own major conflicts of interest — the kind the legacy media would be all over if he had a Conservative label next to his name. Let’s talk about Brookfield Asset Management. Carney was vice-chair at Brookfield, a global investment giant that made a fortune off green energy subsidies — while conveniently opposing pipelines in Canada. But here’s the kicker: while Carney was telling Canadians that oil and gas was a dead industry, Brookfield was busy funding pipelines in the Middle East. That’s right — Carney had no problem helping bankroll fossil fuel expansion overseas while helping crush Canadian energy jobs at home. And it doesn’t end there. Carney also played games with Brookfield’s head office relocation timeline, shifting narratives about when and why they moved their corporate headquarters to the United States. One minute, it’s staying in Canada. The next, it’s heading south. And yet, this is the guy who wants to dictate our economy? Who wants to tell us what industries are “moral” and which ones need to be shut down? He tells us he's about saving Canadian jobs while moving them to the U.S. The hypocrisy is astounding. And here’s where it gets even worse — Carney is already willing to mislead Canadians to avoid accountability. He knows he can’t handle real scrutiny, so instead of answering tough questions, he simply shuts out the only people willing to ask them. Independent journalists are being barred from his events, blocked from getting credentials, and denied access to ask the real questions that the legacy media refuses to touch. Because let’s face it — Carney doesn’t want to be challenged. He doesn’t want to be asked about his WEF loyalties, his conflicts of interest, or his blatant hypocrisy. He wants a coronation, not an election. And the establishment media? They’re more than happy to help him get one. But here’s the thing. None of this is a secret. The information is out there, but the media refuses to touch it. Why? Because Pierre Poilievre has promised to defund them, and they’re terrified. Terrified that Canadians might actually learn the truth about the Liberal Party’s latest Frankenstein experiment before it’s too late. So, if you want to know who really runs this country — who’s pulling the strings, who’s writing the playbook, and who’s about to step in as Trudeau’s heir — then you won’t want to miss this campaign. Because this isn’t just about another Liberal leader. This is about the survival of Canada as we know it. And if we don’t fight back now, we might not get another chance.

The Carney Files: Exposing the new globalist golden boy, Mark Carney From his connections to Epstein associates, his role at Brookfield Asset Management, and the World Economic Forum, Canadians have a lot to learn about globalist golden boy, Mark Carney. The fix is in. Canada’s next prime minister was just anointed behind closed doors in a questionable leadership race. Trudeau's usefulness has run its course. He's not cute anymore. The elites have moved on, and they’ve chosen their new golden boy: Mark Carney. That’s why we’re launching The Carney Files — your one-stop shop for everything the establishment and the legacy media don’t want you to know about the next to sit on the Liberal throne. Because while the mainstream press is polishing their puff pieces, we’re doing what they refuse to — exposing the real Mark Carney. And trust me, there’s a lot to expose. This isn’t just some mild-mannered banker turned politician. Carney was the man whispering in Trudeau's ear for the last five years. All those things the Liberals did to us? That was him — lockdowns; tax hikes; overspending; electric vehicle mandates. Carney is Trudeau 2.0, but more dangerous. He’s the handpicked globalist successor to Trudeau, a man whose loyalties don’t lie with Canada, but with the unelected power brokers who pull the strings from Davos at the World Economic Forum, and the UN. Remember? He's a self-described European, with three citizenships. We’re talking about a man who has spent his entire career pushing the very policies that have gutted the middle class — from his time at the Bank of Canada, to his role at the Bank of England, to his non-stop advocacy for extreme carbon taxation under the guise of “climate action.” And let’s not forget his cozy connections to some very unsavory characters. Does Ghislaine Maxwell ring a bell? Oh yeah, Carney's got tangential ties to her, too. The very same woman who helped Jeffrey Epstein run one of the most disgusting criminal operations in modern history. But good luck hearing that on CBC or CTV. They won’t touch it. Too busy protecting their next meal ticket. And then there’s his manifesto, Values — a book that reads less like a personal philosophy and more like an instruction manual for a globalist coup. In it, Carney lays out his plan for a so-called “moral economy,” where unelected bureaucrats, not free markets, dictate how you live, how you work, and how much you pay for basic necessities. It’s a carbon tax fever dream wrapped in Orwellian doublespeak. But wait, there’s more. Carney has his own major conflicts of interest — the kind the legacy media would be all over if he had a Conservative label next to his name. Let’s talk about Brookfield Asset Management. Carney was vice-chair at Brookfield, a global investment giant that made a fortune off green energy subsidies — while conveniently opposing pipelines in Canada. But here’s the kicker: while Carney was telling Canadians that oil and gas was a dead industry, Brookfield was busy funding pipelines in the Middle East. That’s right — Carney had no problem helping bankroll fossil fuel expansion overseas while helping crush Canadian energy jobs at home. And it doesn’t end there. Carney also played games with Brookfield’s head office relocation timeline, shifting narratives about when and why they moved their corporate headquarters to the United States. One minute, it’s staying in Canada. The next, it’s heading south. And yet, this is the guy who wants to dictate our economy? Who wants to tell us what industries are “moral” and which ones need to be shut down? He tells us he's about saving Canadian jobs while moving them to the U.S. The hypocrisy is astounding. And here’s where it gets even worse — Carney is already willing to mislead Canadians to avoid accountability. He knows he can’t handle real scrutiny, so instead of answering tough questions, he simply shuts out the only people willing to ask them. Independent journalists are being barred from his events, blocked from getting credentials, and denied access to ask the real questions that the legacy media refuses to touch. Because let’s face it — Carney doesn’t want to be challenged. He doesn’t want to be asked about his WEF loyalties, his conflicts of interest, or his blatant hypocrisy. He wants a coronation, not an election. And the establishment media? They’re more than happy to help him get one. But here’s the thing. None of this is a secret. The information is out there, but the media refuses to touch it. Why? Because Pierre Poilievre has promised to defund them, and they’re terrified. Terrified that Canadians might actually learn the truth about the Liberal Party’s latest Frankenstein experiment before it’s too late. So, if you want to know who really runs this country — who’s pulling the strings, who’s writing the playbook, and who’s about to step in as Trudeau’s heir — then you won’t want to miss this campaign. Because this isn’t just about another Liberal leader. This is about the survival of Canada as we know it. And if we don’t fight back now, we might not get another chance.

Rebel News

48,158 views • 1 year ago

$Analyzing Episode 58. Season 2 aka Balancing the Scales This episode was some of Sinem and Ozan's best work. Their expressions landed every single time, and, frankly, short of screaming what the story is trying to say, they did everything they could to convince the audience that CihAl was, is, and will remain the endgame. With that out of the way, let's begin. We start the episode with Cihan shitting literal bricks as he sees Alya is already at the konak with Sadakat and Meryem arriving, right behind him. The reason is clear - he's caught in a difficult situation yet again. He doesn't want things to look like he's overriding Alya's existence in his life as its core, but circumstances keep making it so that he's put in awkward situations, which only compound his fear of pushing Alya past the point of no return. Meryem is all smiles and teeth at seeing the konak, but the minute her eyes land on Alya, her smile and her eyes drop to the floor. Almost like she was expecting something else entirely, but reality has shamed her. Her eyes remain downcast throughout the entire time she's walking towards Alya, as if Alya's the truth she can't cross eyes with. Alya, on the other hand, remains standing tall. She doesn't flinch, doesn't express any outward anger, but you can see the storm raging in her eyes. When Cihan tells her Meryem will have to stay at the konak, she merely looks at him and nods. And you can see terror mixed with shame (I think) on Cihan's face, but hers remains clear of emotion. And then she walks away, saying she needs to collect Deniz because she's tired. Now that's an exit. Poised, calm, and leaving behind an absolute massacre in the onlookers. The scene where Deniz meets Meryem is another masterpiece because it's very subtle in the message it delivers. Which is - human relations go beyond blood, beyond memory, beyond societal impediments, if the love on both sides is strong enough. When Deniz says he's named after his father, the little boy is telling the truth. Cihan may not be his father in blood, but he's the father Deniz loves, the father he chose for himself. Then the same message is repeated through Deniz about CihAl when Sadakat tries to create trouble by saying Alya and Cihan are divorced. To which Deniz innocently replies, they may be divorced now, but they can get married again. Again, highlighting the importance of human connection. CihAl keep choosing each other through whatever challenge life throws at them, because they love each other equally. Yes, marriages and divorce can be forced, but it's the presence or absence of love that determines the final outcome. Case in point, Alya's marriage to Boran, Cihan's marriage to Seyda, Nare with Ozkan, Zerrin and Demir, etc., etc. That's what anyone opposing CihAl doesn't understand. Love finds a way. Always. That's what the story has been about since the beginning - that love will stand strong in front of all, as long as what you feel is truly love, and not some imitation of it. Also, *hint* *hint* that's the second time someone has mentioned CihAl getting married again, so it's definitely coming. Now for the scene where Cihan and Alya talk in their room. Cihan is right to be afraid of Alya here because he's a first-hand witness to how Alya reacts when she's been betrayed. He's seen how she took off Boran's ring and buried it with him after she found out about the will. An extreme situation compared to this one, absolutely. But fears don't use logic. Cihan knows Alya is strong enough to move on, to rise from the ashes - her strength is what he loves and fears at the same time. So, when he says 'Think of the Cihan in Alya's eyes, I don't want to be that Cihan' he's saying I know it looks like I disregarded you and broke your trust again, but that's not how things were. He needs her to show emotions, not because it'll pander to his ego, but because that's a sign she's still involved. That she's not near the point where she says 'enough is enough.' Alya, on the flip side, can't show her emotions. Because, unlike what Cihan fears, it's because she's so in love with him, so involved, that she's afraid to even ask what Cihan feels. Because if she learns Cihan's past isn't just the past, that he still loves Meryem, it'll shatter her unlike anything else. Despite it all, Cihan manages to reach Alya somehow when he pleads, 'I need you to communicate with me.' It's like his fears break past her barriers and, in turn, allow her to open up a little to him because she admits she doesn't know what to do, and then out comes the real question, 'Don't you feel anything?' Kudos to Cihan for not dodging the question and saying whatever he feels for her is just memory and gratitude. Salak. And I say salak with all my love, because he still misses the elephant in the room. The point is the imbalance. When we tell someone they're the only love of our life, we want an equal declaration in return. If not, the loop remains incomplete - with one side a little more invested than the other. And, CihAl's story thus far has been the opposite of imbalance. Their story is about symmetry; they reflect each other in love, in wounds, in loss. Basically everything. So, how is it that Alya's only love is Cihan, while his isn't? It's not. And that's where that necklace reveal becomes important, but we'll get to that later. For now, let's talk about that little talk in the car. The story itself is giving us hints that this imbalance won't last long, because the minute Alya talks about her first brush with romance is the moment jealous Cihan makes a return. He gets jealous of a nameless, formless, 16-year-old boy who once had the audacity to date his wife. That is, he can't tolerate a contender for Alya's affections even in memory. Cihan is extremely possessive about Alya, which is why he doesn't waste a moment to remind her she told him he's her only love. And Alya, being Alya, doesn't waste a moment in reminding him that he didn't. And then she turns the screw a little by telling Cihan not to burn his heart over her teenage crush because she never planned to marry her crush, nor is she conveniently living under the same roof with him. Mic drop. Cihan's face at that moment is a study in being hoist by one's own petard. Because he's expecting Alya to be okay with something he can't even stand the idea of. He's jealous as hell, but he can't do anything about it. But why is all this happening? Because one of Cihan's biggest truths is - he loved Meryem and lost her. In truth, he didn't love her, which is why he didn't fight hard enough, which is why he lost her. If Cihan had truly loved Meryem the way he loves Alya, he would have fought until the bitter end. Like he's doing for Alya. That's the truth. In Uzak, true love isn't passive - it demands to be seen, to be felt, it doesn't sit back quietly and accept defeat. In this story, love demands to be chosen. And Cihan didn't choose Meryem, not in the way it matters. So, why can't Cihan just accept the truth already? Fear and guilt, I think. Fear of the magnitude of what he feels for Alya, and what losing her would do to him. And guilt because some part of him knows he didn't do for Meryem what he's doing for Alya. And of course, now there's the burden of her shitty ex, too. Nonetheless, fate keeps pushing Cihan to realize the truth, over and over again in this episode. Another glimpse of how passive Cihan may have been in his relationship with Meryem is the dinner scene. Sadakat points out how much Meryem loved stuffed kebabs, and Cihan is barely listening. This is the same man who knows what Alya likes to eat when she's on break during duty. When Meryem points out Cihan's allergy, he says it was something he had in the past, but no longer. Almost like he's comparing the feelings he once had for her to an allergy. What an allegory. See? The signs are all there, but Cihan isn't picking up on them completely. Then fate ups the ante with the arrival of Chef Engin. The first thing Cihan asks Alya when Engin is gone is - Is that him? As in, is that the boy you said loved you? The man goes off the rails in 0 to 60 seconds, and keeps coming up with excuses like he may have changed his name or appearance. The idea of not being the only man in Alya's life makes him lose his cool while Alya rightly points out that she's not the one living with her 'first love' currently. Which then leads to Cihan spending the night at the office. So, fate manages to teach him one lesson here. Which is - ask only for that which you're ready to give. Cihan needs emotional exclusivity from Alya, but hasn't given her the same yet. He's not built to share Alya, not with the past, not with a memory, not with anything. But the second he feels even a fraction of what Alya's been going through, he unravels marvelously. And that's the entire point of that sequence. It's not just jealous drama, it's exposure. Cihan is slowly being led towards the one truth staring him in the face. That's where the necklace comes in. Thus far, Ciho seems to be operating under the misconception that Meryem has moved on, like him. But that necklace (and the video) prove otherwise. Meryem's current attachment to him throws neutrality out the window. Because Cihan will now have to set absolute boundaries, and in doing so, understand why he's setting them. Why what he feels for Alya leaves no room for anyone else because he can't stand the idea of something similar in Alya's past, present, or future. Because they are each other's exception, and everyone else was the rule. And that's it from me for now. Till later. Happy reading, y'all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir$

Analyzing Episode 58. Season 2 aka Balancing the Scales This episode was some of Sinem and Ozan's best work. Their expressions landed every single time, and, frankly, short of screaming what the story is trying to say, they did everything they could to convince the audience that CihAl was, is, and will remain the endgame. With that out of the way, let's begin. We start the episode with Cihan shitting literal bricks as he sees Alya is already at the konak with Sadakat and Meryem arriving, right behind him. The reason is clear - he's caught in a difficult situation yet again. He doesn't want things to look like he's overriding Alya's existence in his life as its core, but circumstances keep making it so that he's put in awkward situations, which only compound his fear of pushing Alya past the point of no return. Meryem is all smiles and teeth at seeing the konak, but the minute her eyes land on Alya, her smile and her eyes drop to the floor. Almost like she was expecting something else entirely, but reality has shamed her. Her eyes remain downcast throughout the entire time she's walking towards Alya, as if Alya's the truth she can't cross eyes with. Alya, on the other hand, remains standing tall. She doesn't flinch, doesn't express any outward anger, but you can see the storm raging in her eyes. When Cihan tells her Meryem will have to stay at the konak, she merely looks at him and nods. And you can see terror mixed with shame (I think) on Cihan's face, but hers remains clear of emotion. And then she walks away, saying she needs to collect Deniz because she's tired. Now that's an exit. Poised, calm, and leaving behind an absolute massacre in the onlookers. The scene where Deniz meets Meryem is another masterpiece because it's very subtle in the message it delivers. Which is - human relations go beyond blood, beyond memory, beyond societal impediments, if the love on both sides is strong enough. When Deniz says he's named after his father, the little boy is telling the truth. Cihan may not be his father in blood, but he's the father Deniz loves, the father he chose for himself. Then the same message is repeated through Deniz about CihAl when Sadakat tries to create trouble by saying Alya and Cihan are divorced. To which Deniz innocently replies, they may be divorced now, but they can get married again. Again, highlighting the importance of human connection. CihAl keep choosing each other through whatever challenge life throws at them, because they love each other equally. Yes, marriages and divorce can be forced, but it's the presence or absence of love that determines the final outcome. Case in point, Alya's marriage to Boran, Cihan's marriage to Seyda, Nare with Ozkan, Zerrin and Demir, etc., etc. That's what anyone opposing CihAl doesn't understand. Love finds a way. Always. That's what the story has been about since the beginning - that love will stand strong in front of all, as long as what you feel is truly love, and not some imitation of it. Also, hint hint that's the second time someone has mentioned CihAl getting married again, so it's definitely coming. Now for the scene where Cihan and Alya talk in their room. Cihan is right to be afraid of Alya here because he's a first-hand witness to how Alya reacts when she's been betrayed. He's seen how she took off Boran's ring and buried it with him after she found out about the will. An extreme situation compared to this one, absolutely. But fears don't use logic. Cihan knows Alya is strong enough to move on, to rise from the ashes - her strength is what he loves and fears at the same time. So, when he says 'Think of the Cihan in Alya's eyes, I don't want to be that Cihan' he's saying I know it looks like I disregarded you and broke your trust again, but that's not how things were. He needs her to show emotions, not because it'll pander to his ego, but because that's a sign she's still involved. That she's not near the point where she says 'enough is enough.' Alya, on the flip side, can't show her emotions. Because, unlike what Cihan fears, it's because she's so in love with him, so involved, that she's afraid to even ask what Cihan feels. Because if she learns Cihan's past isn't just the past, that he still loves Meryem, it'll shatter her unlike anything else. Despite it all, Cihan manages to reach Alya somehow when he pleads, 'I need you to communicate with me.' It's like his fears break past her barriers and, in turn, allow her to open up a little to him because she admits she doesn't know what to do, and then out comes the real question, 'Don't you feel anything?' Kudos to Cihan for not dodging the question and saying whatever he feels for her is just memory and gratitude. Salak. And I say salak with all my love, because he still misses the elephant in the room. The point is the imbalance. When we tell someone they're the only love of our life, we want an equal declaration in return. If not, the loop remains incomplete - with one side a little more invested than the other. And, CihAl's story thus far has been the opposite of imbalance. Their story is about symmetry; they reflect each other in love, in wounds, in loss. Basically everything. So, how is it that Alya's only love is Cihan, while his isn't? It's not. And that's where that necklace reveal becomes important, but we'll get to that later. For now, let's talk about that little talk in the car. The story itself is giving us hints that this imbalance won't last long, because the minute Alya talks about her first brush with romance is the moment jealous Cihan makes a return. He gets jealous of a nameless, formless, 16-year-old boy who once had the audacity to date his wife. That is, he can't tolerate a contender for Alya's affections even in memory. Cihan is extremely possessive about Alya, which is why he doesn't waste a moment to remind her she told him he's her only love. And Alya, being Alya, doesn't waste a moment in reminding him that he didn't. And then she turns the screw a little by telling Cihan not to burn his heart over her teenage crush because she never planned to marry her crush, nor is she conveniently living under the same roof with him. Mic drop. Cihan's face at that moment is a study in being hoist by one's own petard. Because he's expecting Alya to be okay with something he can't even stand the idea of. He's jealous as hell, but he can't do anything about it. But why is all this happening? Because one of Cihan's biggest truths is - he loved Meryem and lost her. In truth, he didn't love her, which is why he didn't fight hard enough, which is why he lost her. If Cihan had truly loved Meryem the way he loves Alya, he would have fought until the bitter end. Like he's doing for Alya. That's the truth. In Uzak, true love isn't passive - it demands to be seen, to be felt, it doesn't sit back quietly and accept defeat. In this story, love demands to be chosen. And Cihan didn't choose Meryem, not in the way it matters. So, why can't Cihan just accept the truth already? Fear and guilt, I think. Fear of the magnitude of what he feels for Alya, and what losing her would do to him. And guilt because some part of him knows he didn't do for Meryem what he's doing for Alya. And of course, now there's the burden of her shitty ex, too. Nonetheless, fate keeps pushing Cihan to realize the truth, over and over again in this episode. Another glimpse of how passive Cihan may have been in his relationship with Meryem is the dinner scene. Sadakat points out how much Meryem loved stuffed kebabs, and Cihan is barely listening. This is the same man who knows what Alya likes to eat when she's on break during duty. When Meryem points out Cihan's allergy, he says it was something he had in the past, but no longer. Almost like he's comparing the feelings he once had for her to an allergy. What an allegory. See? The signs are all there, but Cihan isn't picking up on them completely. Then fate ups the ante with the arrival of Chef Engin. The first thing Cihan asks Alya when Engin is gone is - Is that him? As in, is that the boy you said loved you? The man goes off the rails in 0 to 60 seconds, and keeps coming up with excuses like he may have changed his name or appearance. The idea of not being the only man in Alya's life makes him lose his cool while Alya rightly points out that she's not the one living with her 'first love' currently. Which then leads to Cihan spending the night at the office. So, fate manages to teach him one lesson here. Which is - ask only for that which you're ready to give. Cihan needs emotional exclusivity from Alya, but hasn't given her the same yet. He's not built to share Alya, not with the past, not with a memory, not with anything. But the second he feels even a fraction of what Alya's been going through, he unravels marvelously. And that's the entire point of that sequence. It's not just jealous drama, it's exposure. Cihan is slowly being led towards the one truth staring him in the face. That's where the necklace comes in. Thus far, Ciho seems to be operating under the misconception that Meryem has moved on, like him. But that necklace (and the video) prove otherwise. Meryem's current attachment to him throws neutrality out the window. Because Cihan will now have to set absolute boundaries, and in doing so, understand why he's setting them. Why what he feels for Alya leaves no room for anyone else because he can't stand the idea of something similar in Alya's past, present, or future. Because they are each other's exception, and everyone else was the rule. And that's it from me for now. Till later. Happy reading, y'all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

14,669 views • 4 months ago

#TAEMIN Global Spin Live at the Grammy Museum - Fan Questions segment [FULL] 🎙️Host: What was the first song you heard from Taemin? 💎Audience: [shouts a bunch of songs] 🐣Taemin: What is your guys’ favorite song? 💎Fan: NEMO! My cat is named Nemo! Taemin: Oh my cat is named Ggung! 1:55 🎙️Question 1: Do you get embarrassed listening to your own voice? [from Denise] 🐣Taemin: When I record my sexy songs like Sexuality, Criminal, something something, I have to acting more emotional—sexy vibe right? Sometimes very embarssed [demonstrates with the sexy part of Want] 2:55 🎙️Question 2: Taemin, your choreo is always so unique. What’s your favorite choreo that you’ve ever danced? [from Stasia] 🐣Taemin: Honestly my choreographer is in here, Kasper! His choreo is very cool but very hard and fast and aggressive, energetic, but I love that style. So for example—Advice. Recently my favorite song is Flame of Love. It’s Korean style, the moves are more contemporary style, that’s more interesting to me recently Lastly my favorite song is Criminal. That song is very conceptive and also choreographed by Kasper. 5:00 🎙️Question 3: What would you consider to be your greatest achievement in live? [from Emily] 🐣Taemin: When I was young I go to audition for…to be artist. So that is my very important moment. I did it! I debuted! 5:50 🎙️Question 4: What is your favorite pre-show ritual [from Gloria] 🐣Taemin: I always clean my teeth, it’s refreshing….and then recently I started consuming things that are a little sour like lemon juice. It helps with the bloating a little bit. And they said it helps with anxiety. 🎙️Host: It helps with bloating?? 🐣Taemin: ah yes!… ah…maybe? That is not… please search it please! [lololololol he was scared he was giving unproven medical advice] 7:20 🎙️Question 5: If you could collaborate with any artist globally who would it be and what kind of sound do you want to create together? [from Jihae] 🐣Taemin: Ah that’s what you’re curious about! There’s so many artist that I love so it’s really hard to pick one but maybe Billie Eilish? I love her attitude. She could draw in concentration even when she makes small sounds and in contrast I can do something much more energetic and maybe the contrast could create something very special. 9:00 🎙️Question 6: Do you ever sing or perform for your cats? 🐣Taemin: I put them on my lap and I maneuver them a little bit and they dance a little bit [Taemin demonstrates the song he sings them] 🎙️Host: Do you do it to your music or other people’s music? 🐣Taemin: It’s an improvised song! 🎙️Host: Are you gonna show these videos? 🐣Taemin: I don’t have hands to film it! Lol 10:15 🎙️Question 7: What’s the style of your new album? 🐣Taemin: You know just yesterday I was sorting through all the music that I wrote and it kind of gets categorized into 3 categories! We have songs that are really powerful and energetic, and songs that are really emotional and beautiful, and then the third category is a little different…maybe RnB? and now it’s something I have to think about how to present these all together. #TAEMIN_Grammy_Museum

#TAEMIN Global Spin Live at the Grammy Museum - Fan Questions segment [FULL] 🎙️Host: What was the first song you heard from Taemin? 💎Audience: [shouts a bunch of songs] 🐣Taemin: What is your guys’ favorite song? 💎Fan: NEMO! My cat is named Nemo! Taemin: Oh my cat is named Ggung! 1:55 🎙️Question 1: Do you get embarrassed listening to your own voice? [from Denise] 🐣Taemin: When I record my sexy songs like Sexuality, Criminal, something something, I have to acting more emotional—sexy vibe right? Sometimes very embarssed [demonstrates with the sexy part of Want] 2:55 🎙️Question 2: Taemin, your choreo is always so unique. What’s your favorite choreo that you’ve ever danced? [from Stasia] 🐣Taemin: Honestly my choreographer is in here, Kasper! His choreo is very cool but very hard and fast and aggressive, energetic, but I love that style. So for example—Advice. Recently my favorite song is Flame of Love. It’s Korean style, the moves are more contemporary style, that’s more interesting to me recently Lastly my favorite song is Criminal. That song is very conceptive and also choreographed by Kasper. 5:00 🎙️Question 3: What would you consider to be your greatest achievement in live? [from Emily] 🐣Taemin: When I was young I go to audition for…to be artist. So that is my very important moment. I did it! I debuted! 5:50 🎙️Question 4: What is your favorite pre-show ritual [from Gloria] 🐣Taemin: I always clean my teeth, it’s refreshing….and then recently I started consuming things that are a little sour like lemon juice. It helps with the bloating a little bit. And they said it helps with anxiety. 🎙️Host: It helps with bloating?? 🐣Taemin: ah yes!… ah…maybe? That is not… please search it please! [lololololol he was scared he was giving unproven medical advice] 7:20 🎙️Question 5: If you could collaborate with any artist globally who would it be and what kind of sound do you want to create together? [from Jihae] 🐣Taemin: Ah that’s what you’re curious about! There’s so many artist that I love so it’s really hard to pick one but maybe Billie Eilish? I love her attitude. She could draw in concentration even when she makes small sounds and in contrast I can do something much more energetic and maybe the contrast could create something very special. 9:00 🎙️Question 6: Do you ever sing or perform for your cats? 🐣Taemin: I put them on my lap and I maneuver them a little bit and they dance a little bit [Taemin demonstrates the song he sings them] 🎙️Host: Do you do it to your music or other people’s music? 🐣Taemin: It’s an improvised song! 🎙️Host: Are you gonna show these videos? 🐣Taemin: I don’t have hands to film it! Lol 10:15 🎙️Question 7: What’s the style of your new album? 🐣Taemin: You know just yesterday I was sorting through all the music that I wrote and it kind of gets categorized into 3 categories! We have songs that are really powerful and energetic, and songs that are really emotional and beautiful, and then the third category is a little different…maybe RnB? and now it’s something I have to think about how to present these all together. #TAEMIN_Grammy_Museum

cindy 🌥️

17,455 views • 7 months ago

At one point John Travolta was going to play Manny in Scarface, but they went with unknown actor Steven Bauer because they wanted someone who was actually Cuban. At the time, Bauer was a struggling actor being pigeonholed into becoming a soap star. He explains… "I left Hollywood because I wasn't getting really good roles, I was getting stupid roles in television, and I was like, "Fuck, I gotta get in." And I met Stella Adler, the great teacher, and she said, "Come to New York, darling, study with me. "You have to become an actor." So I went to New York. So I'm in New York for like a year, and at the end of the year, I'm starving - my agents in Hollywood think I'm absolutely nuts, and they're like, "You've gotta come home, or at least go in for a soap opera in New York, you have the right type, blah blah blah" And I'm like, "No, no, I'm not doing that." And they're like, "But you're gonna starve." And I go, "I'll deliver furniture." - So I was delivering furniture. And then on my last day, finally they come in, "We have a meeting for you. An audition for a TV movie, and maybe for another independent feature." And I go, "Okay." "So we'll get you the airfare and come home." - I go, "Okay, I'm coming home." So I'm in New York on that last day, and my manager calls me, she goes, "Wait, before you go to the airport. They're casting a movie with Al Pacino, it's called Scarface, and it's a remake of an old movie. And the second lead is a tall, handsome Cuban boy, who's fun, and that's you - It's to play his best friend." And I go, "Yeah, what shot do I have with that!?" And they go, "No, they want someone new. They want someone new." - So I go uptown… She (the casting agent) opens the door - and she goes, "Come in, come in, come in, come in. Sit down, tell me who you are. Tell me what you've done. Tell me what you're working on - You've done theater? - “Yeah”, and television? “Yes." “You speak Spanish?" - I go, "I'm Cuban." And she goes, "You're really Cuban!?" And I go, "Yeah." And she goes…“Hang on a second…" (Imitating phone dial) - Regular phone, no cell phones - “Yeah, yeah. Brian, I found your guy. Right in front on me! "I found Manny, I found Manny. I swear to God, you got to see him. Can you see him?...okay, I'll send him over” - click. She goes "Go down to - the Village on Fifth and Eighth Street. And go see Brian De Palma… I got in a cab, and there was so much traffic that I had to get out of the cab and run the rest of the way to the Village. Because I was stuck in traffic! And I was running out of money! I had no money left! So I run to meet him, and he opens the door, and he's very lackadaisical. He's very aloof, Brian. And he's like, "Mm….yeah, you look…yeah, I can see it…are you really Cuban?" I go, "Yeah, I'm really Cuban." "Can you really speak Spanish?" I go, "Yes!" And he goes... "Wait, I'm gonna call Marty Bregman. He's the producer. He's in LA." He calls Marty... "Marty, I have this kid. He's perfect…yes, he's Cuban…." He gets up and he goes, "Okay, go to LA. Go see Marty Bregman tomorrow. Go to his office. He'll give you a script, learn it, and in two weeks we'll fly you back here for auditions."…And I was like, "Fly me back? I didn't have enough, I couldn't pay my airfare…" And then I get home, and I tell my agents, and they say, "John Travolta's playing Manny." And I said, "Wait, John Travolta's playing Manny?" "Yeah." And I go, "No, no, no, no. They're telling me I have a good shot at it." And they go, "You're an idiot. And you believe everything you hear." …And they were fired, obviously (laughing). They work on Wall Street now… That’s really how it happened. I met Bregman, and Bregman said, "You're gonna do Scarface." Just like that in his office - And I said, "But, but, how do you know?" - he goes, "You're really Cuban, right?" And he goes, - "I don't want a star. I don't want a superstar. I don't want another star. I don't want a prima donna. I don't want any of that. You're gonna do Scarface.”

At one point John Travolta was going to play Manny in Scarface, but they went with unknown actor Steven Bauer because they wanted someone who was actually Cuban. At the time, Bauer was a struggling actor being pigeonholed into becoming a soap star. He explains… "I left Hollywood because I wasn't getting really good roles, I was getting stupid roles in television, and I was like, "Fuck, I gotta get in." And I met Stella Adler, the great teacher, and she said, "Come to New York, darling, study with me. "You have to become an actor." So I went to New York. So I'm in New York for like a year, and at the end of the year, I'm starving - my agents in Hollywood think I'm absolutely nuts, and they're like, "You've gotta come home, or at least go in for a soap opera in New York, you have the right type, blah blah blah" And I'm like, "No, no, I'm not doing that." And they're like, "But you're gonna starve." And I go, "I'll deliver furniture." - So I was delivering furniture. And then on my last day, finally they come in, "We have a meeting for you. An audition for a TV movie, and maybe for another independent feature." And I go, "Okay." "So we'll get you the airfare and come home." - I go, "Okay, I'm coming home." So I'm in New York on that last day, and my manager calls me, she goes, "Wait, before you go to the airport. They're casting a movie with Al Pacino, it's called Scarface, and it's a remake of an old movie. And the second lead is a tall, handsome Cuban boy, who's fun, and that's you - It's to play his best friend." And I go, "Yeah, what shot do I have with that!?" And they go, "No, they want someone new. They want someone new." - So I go uptown… She (the casting agent) opens the door - and she goes, "Come in, come in, come in, come in. Sit down, tell me who you are. Tell me what you've done. Tell me what you're working on - You've done theater? - “Yeah”, and television? “Yes." “You speak Spanish?" - I go, "I'm Cuban." And she goes, "You're really Cuban!?" And I go, "Yeah." And she goes…“Hang on a second…" (Imitating phone dial) - Regular phone, no cell phones - “Yeah, yeah. Brian, I found your guy. Right in front on me! "I found Manny, I found Manny. I swear to God, you got to see him. Can you see him?...okay, I'll send him over” - click. She goes "Go down to - the Village on Fifth and Eighth Street. And go see Brian De Palma… I got in a cab, and there was so much traffic that I had to get out of the cab and run the rest of the way to the Village. Because I was stuck in traffic! And I was running out of money! I had no money left! So I run to meet him, and he opens the door, and he's very lackadaisical. He's very aloof, Brian. And he's like, "Mm….yeah, you look…yeah, I can see it…are you really Cuban?" I go, "Yeah, I'm really Cuban." "Can you really speak Spanish?" I go, "Yes!" And he goes... "Wait, I'm gonna call Marty Bregman. He's the producer. He's in LA." He calls Marty... "Marty, I have this kid. He's perfect…yes, he's Cuban…." He gets up and he goes, "Okay, go to LA. Go see Marty Bregman tomorrow. Go to his office. He'll give you a script, learn it, and in two weeks we'll fly you back here for auditions."…And I was like, "Fly me back? I didn't have enough, I couldn't pay my airfare…" And then I get home, and I tell my agents, and they say, "John Travolta's playing Manny." And I said, "Wait, John Travolta's playing Manny?" "Yeah." And I go, "No, no, no, no. They're telling me I have a good shot at it." And they go, "You're an idiot. And you believe everything you hear." …And they were fired, obviously (laughing). They work on Wall Street now… That’s really how it happened. I met Bregman, and Bregman said, "You're gonna do Scarface." Just like that in his office - And I said, "But, but, how do you know?" - he goes, "You're really Cuban, right?" And he goes, - "I don't want a star. I don't want a superstar. I don't want another star. I don't want a prima donna. I don't want any of that. You're gonna do Scarface.”

Gangster Cinema Central

1,801,775 views • 3 months ago

Fascinating exchange: Jon Karl lightly confronts Zohran Mamdani with Darializa Avila-Chevalier's insane positions. Mamdani says DAC won because of affordability before tripling down on the virulent anti-semitism that undergirds DSA. Karl takes two passes at getting Mamdani to condemn the coffee shop that banned Rep. Dan Goldman, allows Mamdani to skate with a non-critical critique. JON KARL: Now, you know, there's been a lot of attention on one of the candidates you supported, one who knocked off an incumbent Democrat, is Darializa Avila Chevalier. She said some very controversial things, including calling for the abolition of prisons- couldn't say whether or not somebody who had committed murder should be in prison. Called for open borders. Against all deportations, including those of violent criminals. Are those positions that the Democratic Party could win on nationally? ZOHRAN MAMDANI: I think what the Democratic Party can win on nationally is a focus on working people, and I think that what I saw from Darializa when I would walk the streets of her district was a focus on what she describes as the politics of life. She would talk about how we have to invest in babies, not bombs. She's now going to represent what is one of the poorest districts in the United States of America. And what people in that district are exhausted by is a politics that has justified the spending of tens of billions of dollars in killing civilians overseas, while working people are struggling just to do the basics. KARL: But how does that -- how does abolishing prisons or having open borders fit into that? I mean, do you see how that's -- those are ideas that a lot of your Democrats that are warning about what happened here say are toxic, most of America won't go along with. They are bad ideas. They are dangerous ideas. MAMDANI: I think what the focus of her race was, what the focus of her candidacy was, was about the struggle that working people are facing. And I think that we can have disagreements on policy positions. What we have to agree on is what are we fighting for, and who are we fighting for? She showed that in her race, and I think that many people will come to appreciate that in her leadership to come. KARL: So we can disagree on something as basic as whether or not there should be prisons? MAMDANI: There -- KARL: That's not your position? MAMDANI: There are prisons. KARL: Yes. MAMDANI: And what we're also showing in this city is that safety is not something that's up for debate. It’s something that we're actually delivering on. And I'm proud to be the mayor of a city that currently has the lowest recorded number of murders and shootings in recorded history in New York City. KARL: So there was also a take -- it's not just Democrats. You probably heard what President Trump had to say about you and about the candidates you supported. And he warned that if socialists win -- and he calls you communists but -- you will start living in squalor, there'll be no food, no housing, no military, no law and order. There'll be nothing, and he had a few other choice words. By the way, he also said he still likes you. (LAUGHTER) KARL: But what do you make of what he -- I mean, the Democrat -- Republicans are going to make you the poster child for the Democratic Party. MAMDANI: Let them. We don't have to ask ourselves what life looks like if a socialist wins. I won last November, and over the course of these last six months, what we've delivered for working people are the very things we were told were impossible. We've delivered free childcare for two-year-olds for the first time in New York City history. We've delivered tens of millions of dollars back to tenants who were taken advantage of by bad landlords. We've delivered 165,000 potholes being paved. And we've done all of these things while also delivering the lowest recorded crime in our city's history. That's what it looks like to have Democratic socialism. And what you're seeing is that New Yorkers experienced this for six months and made the decision that they wanted to see more of it on the national stage as well. KARL: Can a Democratic socialist get elected president? MAMDANI: I think a Democratic socialist can get elected anywhere across this country for any position. What I think we need to bring is a focus on working people. KARL: And that's the direction that the party should go in, in terms of selecting a candidate for 2028? MAMDANI: I think the direction that the party should go in is how best to fight for working people. I think we need to have a platform and a vision that doesn't sound as if it was cooked up by consultants, but instead one that you would say in response to someone who's asking, why can't I afford my rent, why can't I afford my groceries, why can't I afford my childcare? We need to make clear who we stand for, how we're going to stand for them, and that we're actually willing to fight for them when the going gets tough. KARL: Obviously, Israel was a big issue in these races. Not the only issue, but a big issue. Is there room in the Democratic Party for candidates, officials who support Israel, not just support Israel, but support military aid for Israel? This was a huge issue for you. MAMDANI: Well, I think what we've seen is that the time for us, as elected officials, to pronounce what the party should be is one that should come to an end, and we should let Democratic voters themselves take the lead. We've seen on Tuesday evening, we saw Democrats turn out in districts across the city to make clear that they were tired of tens of billions of dollars being spent in our taxpayer dollars to violate international law, to kill thousands of civilians. And you and I know that right now, the way that Palestine is described is as if there is a ceasefire. That's the language that's typically used. KARL: Yes. MAMDANI: More than a thousand Palestinians have been killed in that ceasefire. And what New Yorkers want to see is a politics of conscience, a politics of clarity, a politics of conviction. And to follow international law, to believe in the humanity of all people, it shouldn't be a journey too far. And I think that our party needs to hear what Democrats are telling them. KARL: Democratic Socialists of America now says they no longer favor a two-state solution. Is that the way you see it as well, the idea of two states, Palestinian and Jewish states, side by side, living in peace? MAMDANI: The way I see it is, equal rights for all people. And I think that that's the truth for Israel. It's the truth for any country in the world. And frankly, as we're coming up close to the 250th anniversary of our nation, one of the things that makes me proudest to be an American is the belief that equal rights are at the bedrock of our notion of what it means to be an American. KARL: And the idea of a Jewish state, Israel as a Jewish state, that's in the charter, that's the way it is now. Do you support that? MAMDANI: I've said time and again that I support the state of Israel as a state with equal rights. I believe that any state that -- KARL: But as a Jewish state is the question. MAMDANI: I think any state that privileges one religion over the other is one that I can't tell you I support, whether it be Israel or Saudi Arabia or anywhere else. And a lot of that comes back to a fundamental belief that we should all be considered equal, no matter what our faith is. KARL: How big a problem -- you've said it's rising -- is anti-Semitism in this city? MAMDANI: We've seen anti-Semitism rise in this city. We've seen the fact that Jewish New Yorkers comprise a minority of our city's population, and yet continue to constitute a majority of the hate crimes that have been purveyed in this city. And that's something that's unacceptable. It's something that we will never come to see as if it is a part of life. It's something that has to be fought and rooted out of every one of the five boroughs. KARL: What did you think when Dan Goldman -- that coffee shop in Brooklyn said that they didn't -- they wouldn't serve him because of his support for Israel. Do you have a problem with – I mean, the idea of, you know, of an establishment like that saying they're not going to serve somebody if they support Israel? MAMDANI: I've said that I have political disagreements with Congressmember Goldman. I do believe that that's a response that goes beyond that. KARL: So, that's not the right kind of thing? MAMDANI: No, I think -- I think it's much better to keep that critique in the way that we’ve done it.

Fascinating exchange: Jon Karl lightly confronts Zohran Mamdani with Darializa Avila-Chevalier's insane positions. Mamdani says DAC won because of affordability before tripling down on the virulent anti-semitism that undergirds DSA. Karl takes two passes at getting Mamdani to condemn the coffee shop that banned Rep. Dan Goldman, allows Mamdani to skate with a non-critical critique. JON KARL: Now, you know, there's been a lot of attention on one of the candidates you supported, one who knocked off an incumbent Democrat, is Darializa Avila Chevalier. She said some very controversial things, including calling for the abolition of prisons- couldn't say whether or not somebody who had committed murder should be in prison. Called for open borders. Against all deportations, including those of violent criminals. Are those positions that the Democratic Party could win on nationally? ZOHRAN MAMDANI: I think what the Democratic Party can win on nationally is a focus on working people, and I think that what I saw from Darializa when I would walk the streets of her district was a focus on what she describes as the politics of life. She would talk about how we have to invest in babies, not bombs. She's now going to represent what is one of the poorest districts in the United States of America. And what people in that district are exhausted by is a politics that has justified the spending of tens of billions of dollars in killing civilians overseas, while working people are struggling just to do the basics. KARL: But how does that -- how does abolishing prisons or having open borders fit into that? I mean, do you see how that's -- those are ideas that a lot of your Democrats that are warning about what happened here say are toxic, most of America won't go along with. They are bad ideas. They are dangerous ideas. MAMDANI: I think what the focus of her race was, what the focus of her candidacy was, was about the struggle that working people are facing. And I think that we can have disagreements on policy positions. What we have to agree on is what are we fighting for, and who are we fighting for? She showed that in her race, and I think that many people will come to appreciate that in her leadership to come. KARL: So we can disagree on something as basic as whether or not there should be prisons? MAMDANI: There -- KARL: That's not your position? MAMDANI: There are prisons. KARL: Yes. MAMDANI: And what we're also showing in this city is that safety is not something that's up for debate. It’s something that we're actually delivering on. And I'm proud to be the mayor of a city that currently has the lowest recorded number of murders and shootings in recorded history in New York City. KARL: So there was also a take -- it's not just Democrats. You probably heard what President Trump had to say about you and about the candidates you supported. And he warned that if socialists win -- and he calls you communists but -- you will start living in squalor, there'll be no food, no housing, no military, no law and order. There'll be nothing, and he had a few other choice words. By the way, he also said he still likes you. (LAUGHTER) KARL: But what do you make of what he -- I mean, the Democrat -- Republicans are going to make you the poster child for the Democratic Party. MAMDANI: Let them. We don't have to ask ourselves what life looks like if a socialist wins. I won last November, and over the course of these last six months, what we've delivered for working people are the very things we were told were impossible. We've delivered free childcare for two-year-olds for the first time in New York City history. We've delivered tens of millions of dollars back to tenants who were taken advantage of by bad landlords. We've delivered 165,000 potholes being paved. And we've done all of these things while also delivering the lowest recorded crime in our city's history. That's what it looks like to have Democratic socialism. And what you're seeing is that New Yorkers experienced this for six months and made the decision that they wanted to see more of it on the national stage as well. KARL: Can a Democratic socialist get elected president? MAMDANI: I think a Democratic socialist can get elected anywhere across this country for any position. What I think we need to bring is a focus on working people. KARL: And that's the direction that the party should go in, in terms of selecting a candidate for 2028? MAMDANI: I think the direction that the party should go in is how best to fight for working people. I think we need to have a platform and a vision that doesn't sound as if it was cooked up by consultants, but instead one that you would say in response to someone who's asking, why can't I afford my rent, why can't I afford my groceries, why can't I afford my childcare? We need to make clear who we stand for, how we're going to stand for them, and that we're actually willing to fight for them when the going gets tough. KARL: Obviously, Israel was a big issue in these races. Not the only issue, but a big issue. Is there room in the Democratic Party for candidates, officials who support Israel, not just support Israel, but support military aid for Israel? This was a huge issue for you. MAMDANI: Well, I think what we've seen is that the time for us, as elected officials, to pronounce what the party should be is one that should come to an end, and we should let Democratic voters themselves take the lead. We've seen on Tuesday evening, we saw Democrats turn out in districts across the city to make clear that they were tired of tens of billions of dollars being spent in our taxpayer dollars to violate international law, to kill thousands of civilians. And you and I know that right now, the way that Palestine is described is as if there is a ceasefire. That's the language that's typically used. KARL: Yes. MAMDANI: More than a thousand Palestinians have been killed in that ceasefire. And what New Yorkers want to see is a politics of conscience, a politics of clarity, a politics of conviction. And to follow international law, to believe in the humanity of all people, it shouldn't be a journey too far. And I think that our party needs to hear what Democrats are telling them. KARL: Democratic Socialists of America now says they no longer favor a two-state solution. Is that the way you see it as well, the idea of two states, Palestinian and Jewish states, side by side, living in peace? MAMDANI: The way I see it is, equal rights for all people. And I think that that's the truth for Israel. It's the truth for any country in the world. And frankly, as we're coming up close to the 250th anniversary of our nation, one of the things that makes me proudest to be an American is the belief that equal rights are at the bedrock of our notion of what it means to be an American. KARL: And the idea of a Jewish state, Israel as a Jewish state, that's in the charter, that's the way it is now. Do you support that? MAMDANI: I've said time and again that I support the state of Israel as a state with equal rights. I believe that any state that -- KARL: But as a Jewish state is the question. MAMDANI: I think any state that privileges one religion over the other is one that I can't tell you I support, whether it be Israel or Saudi Arabia or anywhere else. And a lot of that comes back to a fundamental belief that we should all be considered equal, no matter what our faith is. KARL: How big a problem -- you've said it's rising -- is anti-Semitism in this city? MAMDANI: We've seen anti-Semitism rise in this city. We've seen the fact that Jewish New Yorkers comprise a minority of our city's population, and yet continue to constitute a majority of the hate crimes that have been purveyed in this city. And that's something that's unacceptable. It's something that we will never come to see as if it is a part of life. It's something that has to be fought and rooted out of every one of the five boroughs. KARL: What did you think when Dan Goldman -- that coffee shop in Brooklyn said that they didn't -- they wouldn't serve him because of his support for Israel. Do you have a problem with – I mean, the idea of, you know, of an establishment like that saying they're not going to serve somebody if they support Israel? MAMDANI: I've said that I have political disagreements with Congressmember Goldman. I do believe that that's a response that goes beyond that. KARL: So, that's not the right kind of thing? MAMDANI: No, I think -- I think it's much better to keep that critique in the way that we’ve done it.

Jorge Bonilla

43,262 views • 2 months ago

GUYS PLEASE GRAB YOUR TISSUES RIGHT NOW BECAUSE THIS PART IS SO EMOTIONAL😭😭😭 WHAT THE FUCK, THEY REALLY HAVE THE HEALTHIEST RELATIONSHIP EVER ISTG, I AM LITERALLY SOBBING RIGHT NOW😭😭😭😭😭😭 👤: lastly, do you have any words to thank each other for the journey so far and for continuing keep going together? 🦆: that's....... 🐰: *pokes at Keng* 🦆: should I say it right here?😅😳 👤: yess! we’ve been here watching you two grow since day one, so say it right in front of us 🐰: 😂 hehe, ooyyy *points to the reporter* 🦆: *shy* what should I say?🤭 🐰: *shy too* I'll cover my ears then (so Keng wouldn't be shy) 🦆: I want to say.... 👤: Namping, look at his face while he speaks so it'll feel more sincere 🦆: I want to say that Nong is extremely talented and Nong has grows cuter every single day. he's is someone who keeps improving and getting better version of himself every day. lately, what I love most about him is how he pays attention to the little things again, just like back when we first to know each other. when work got busier, we had less time for ourselves and the people around us, so some of those small details faded. but now, that side of him is back. he’s so happy over the smallest things. recently, I bought him this little water drop toy, you guys might have seen it, and he sat there happily, smiling and talking about it for 10 minutes straight. he kept saying how great it was, looking at it all the way until we boarded the plane. I hope he keeps this bright version of himself going, because it brings happiness not only to him, but everyone around him gets to be happy just watching him smile 🐰: first of all, Namping want to thank you a lot too *gives wai* thank you for all the time we’ve spent together. he’s been such a good, adorable person. and most importantly, we work hard to maintain our relationship and be great partners for each other so well. because it's not like back in the early days, there were times where we cared for each other well, but then lose that care or closeness over time (means, kind of took those close feelings for granted so they forgot about the little things like monthly anniversary), we don't want that to happen. so whenever our monthly anniversary comes around, we try to make each moment feel fresh and new. we pay attention to the things each other likes, so we can keep encouraging and boosting each other’s energy as we move forward. of course, there are times when we get bored, bicker, or have disagreements, but the crucial thing is that we keep fighting through it together. we still want to step forward together and grow side by side together 🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠 #KengNamping

GUYS PLEASE GRAB YOUR TISSUES RIGHT NOW BECAUSE THIS PART IS SO EMOTIONAL😭😭😭 WHAT THE FUCK, THEY REALLY HAVE THE HEALTHIEST RELATIONSHIP EVER ISTG, I AM LITERALLY SOBBING RIGHT NOW😭😭😭😭😭😭 👤: lastly, do you have any words to thank each other for the journey so far and for continuing keep going together? 🦆: that's....... 🐰: pokes at Keng 🦆: should I say it right here?😅😳 👤: yess! we’ve been here watching you two grow since day one, so say it right in front of us 🐰: 😂 hehe, ooyyy points to the reporter 🦆: shy what should I say?🤭 🐰: shy too I'll cover my ears then (so Keng wouldn't be shy) 🦆: I want to say.... 👤: Namping, look at his face while he speaks so it'll feel more sincere 🦆: I want to say that Nong is extremely talented and Nong has grows cuter every single day. he's is someone who keeps improving and getting better version of himself every day. lately, what I love most about him is how he pays attention to the little things again, just like back when we first to know each other. when work got busier, we had less time for ourselves and the people around us, so some of those small details faded. but now, that side of him is back. he’s so happy over the smallest things. recently, I bought him this little water drop toy, you guys might have seen it, and he sat there happily, smiling and talking about it for 10 minutes straight. he kept saying how great it was, looking at it all the way until we boarded the plane. I hope he keeps this bright version of himself going, because it brings happiness not only to him, but everyone around him gets to be happy just watching him smile 🐰: first of all, Namping want to thank you a lot too gives wai thank you for all the time we’ve spent together. he’s been such a good, adorable person. and most importantly, we work hard to maintain our relationship and be great partners for each other so well. because it's not like back in the early days, there were times where we cared for each other well, but then lose that care or closeness over time (means, kind of took those close feelings for granted so they forgot about the little things like monthly anniversary), we don't want that to happen. so whenever our monthly anniversary comes around, we try to make each moment feel fresh and new. we pay attention to the things each other likes, so we can keep encouraging and boosting each other’s energy as we move forward. of course, there are times when we get bored, bicker, or have disagreements, but the crucial thing is that we keep fighting through it together. we still want to step forward together and grow side by side together 🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠😭🫠 #KengNamping

fifi🦆🐰

26,756 views • 1 month ago

YOU ARE NOT THE TARGET MARKET FOR EVERYTHING. Sino has raised some interesting points. What he failed to grasp is that radio & television broadcasters cater for different demographics and segmented part of the collective, in society and their consumers. 1. “ask a man” is THE or one of the most popular segments on MetroFM and on SA radio. Popularity = media sales … in this case… influences ad buy-ins on the slot. 2. A radio station can’t just be centred around the interests of one specific listener block and sustain a viable business model, while trying to compete for a wider audience pull. 3. Extrapolating on 2 above, 947 or 5FM can’t just be a whole day of one show format with different presenters. Gen Z aren’t the only listeners, within that group … there are different fans of different perspectives, music, vibes, etc. 4. UKhozi is an isiZulu station, to expect anything less from that, is to not understand the basic intent behind the station. That’s like complaining that Joshua Doore sells too much furniture. 5. 947 and Anele, well, I will give him the impact and looming presence of the broadcaster around the brand. That said, I think the gentleman does not listen to the station or engage in the brand output across the board. He knows Anele, but trust, 947 listeners are attuned to and support other talent and extensional things that have nothing to do with Anele. Has he been to Joburg Day? Does he not know how big Top 40 is? Of course Anele & the Club gets more social media attention because it is a breakfast show, popular and media sales gold for Primedia. 5. MetroFM is not Y, it caters to a wider age demo hence you even have different shows with different genres and a current affairs show. 6. Umhlobo Wenene. I hear his points. I’m not too familiar with the station. On the new talent point; But don’t they have the talent search anymore? I know they used to have talent competition similar to Ukhozi. 7. Song Of The Year … that’s a whole essay on its own. 🫣 Lemme not make this too long; Dare I ask though … If catering to Gen Z was “the hill”, then why is a station that is specifically targeting them, Y, not the most listened to station in SA, or even in its regional designation of Gauteng? By the way … has he not noticed that YFM is slowly pivoting to the 947 template? 😉 Broadcasting is a business. Money is the bottom line — not pandering to monolithic perception of demographics.

Kgopolo

155,967 views • 1 year ago

🚨CABBAGE PATCH KIDS WHAT HAVE I TOLD YOU IT’S DARKER THAN WHAT WE’VE HAVR BEEN TOLD. Dark truth behind Cabbage Patch Kids may ruin your childhood Cabbage Patch Kids were a controversial child commodity. The alleged 'USP' of the Cabbage Patch collection was the official ownership documentation that they came with - including birth certificates and adoption papers. The idea was formed by original owner Xavier Roberts, whose line of pinched-nose, close-eyed dolls was first and foremost called 'Little People'. And apparently, that's because the wacky businessman wanted owners to see them as just that - little people, as opposed to dolls. So much so, that he actually purchased a property in Cleveland, Georgia and set up the fictional 'birthplace' of his babies, which he alarmingly named the Babyland General Hospital. It gets weirder, because the alleged infant health facility still exists, attracting countless fans of the macabre year upon year. Staff working at the toy store in its prime were referred to as doctors and nurses to add to the notion of the dolls being delivered. According to a downright eerie fairytale of how the brand name idea came about - which is still listed on the toy firm's website - as a child, owner Xavier was reportedly approached while playing in the garden by a bee-bunny hybrid creature. A young Xavier then claimed to have followed the 'adorable' critter to a field of cabbages where more 'bunnybees' were sprouting tiny babies out of the vegetables, as well as fully grown boy named Otis, who told him he needed to help all the new Cabbage Patch babies find their homes... According to the official website, there is a rather eerie and sinister fairytale about how they became known as "Cabbage Patch Kids". It says that as a child, Xavier was playing in the garden when a bee-bunny hybrid creature approached him, and Xavier followed it to a field of cabbages. The bunnybee creatures were "sprouting tiny babies out of the vegetables". Xavier also came across a boy called Otis, who told him he needed to help all of the Cabbage Kids find their forever homes. Writer Sarah Baird took to X to share her strange visit to an American Cabbage Patch 'hospital' where dolls 'give birth' and adopters have to sign an oath to take their newborn dolly home. Kicking off a thread that left readers gobsmacked, she said: "A few weeks ago we were camping in the north Georgia mountains and happened to drive past a bunch of signs for 'babyland general hospital' where cabbage patch dolls are 'born' so we decided to check it out as kitschy fun…" Detailing the unusual way in which the Cabbage Patch Kids are 'born' in the facility, Baird explained: "We were absolutely not prepared to witness the ceremony of a 'licensed patch nurse' helping a giant, led-light covered tree called 'mother cabbage' give 'birth' to a cabbage patch doll!" Just when you thought things couldn't get much more bizzare, the writer revealed that the birthing procedure was far more serious than you'd expect for a children's toy, with a dedicated 'nurse' on deck to ensure the whole birth runs smoothly. According to Baird, Cabbage Patch-related puns were even thrown into the mix during the birth. She wrote: "The 'nurse' kept calling out mother cabbage’s dilation as 'five leaves apart, seven leaves apart, nine leaves apart' until she eventually announced that mother cabbage had to have a 'leaves-iotomy' (like an episiotomy) in order to deliver the baby…" No expenses were spared when offering the mother doll 'pain relief', either: "The nurse gave mother cabbage a shot of 'imagicillin' to help her 'relax before, during and after labor and delivery," Baird explained Per The Mirror News

SANTINO

19,408 views • 2 months ago

Alright, here's the epic towel rant from tonight; And so that's what kind of tipped me off in real time. I was like: wait a minute. Is Judge Doolin ruling from the bench right now? And then I was like: wait a minute. He's ruling from the bench and ordering them to appoint a new prosecutor and potentially the Attorney General. Oh my word. How—what is this? I—this wasn't on my bingo card. Even now I'm just like: Oh my God, I can't believe he did that. Judge Doolin—in a good way. I'm just like: Oh my God, there is hope. And then to follow it up with: "Oh yeah, I'm thinking about a hearing on the contempt." Oh my God—you're telegraphing. You're going to have a contempt hearing after the Attorney General is potentially on the case. The other witnesses, however, are left in this position where they have this kind of not really well-funded—like kind of spastic prosecution, like the special prosecutors on the Kearney cases. Then you got the December 23rd, 2023 criminal charges against Aidan that were charged in Dedham District Court, 23rd or 26th or so. And that was for illegally—allegedly—recording Lindsey Gaetani and then submitting an edited version of the recording into court for some reason. I don't know why Aidan did that, especially apparently when there's an original version of the recording pursuant to some of the statements in court. And then also for intimidating Lindsey—for allegedly going over there on December 23rd, 2023—against Karen Read's advice and against his lawyers' advice, apparently, according to a leaked group chat message from Facebook in 2024—in May of 2024—going over to Lindsey's apartment. And then according to the affidavit from the search warrant for Karen Read's cell phone—allegedly telling Lindsey that she shouldn't cooperate with the grand jury. She should—she could remove information from her phone or something—that Aidan would get her a lawyer, but only if she agreed to meet with a lawyer only with him present, because she had, quote, "broken his trust." It just like—wild stuff. And that new grand jury, by the way, was apparently—it did go forward. And then in time it came out that it—that was about Karen and Aidan and witness intimidation and conspiracy, because Aidan Kearney—between October and November—really August and November of 2023—it started telling Lindsey Gaetani about his communications with Karen Read that included—in writing—Exhibit O to Karen Read search warrant affidavit, which says that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that in November of 2023—November 28, 2023, to be specific—that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that Karen Read and her team at ex parte conversations with former U.S. Attorney Josh Levy—which was right in the window of time that Jessica Leslie, the grand juror leaker, was leaking information. Leslie started leaking in August of 2022—which is the same month that Alan Jackson joined Karen Read's legal team. And Josh Levy—who was one of the U.S. Attorneys in charge of that grand jury—Leslie was leaking about four different cases: probably the Birchmore case, definitely the Read and O'Keefe case, definitely the CDL case. One more case. We can't really—the group of us journalists involved in this—can't really figure out. So right in the middle of that—November of 2023—Josh Levy is leaking ex parte grand jury information to Karen Read, which she's putting—she's telling Aidan Kearney about; he's putting it in writing. He just was trying to just show off for Lindsey, but you don't like—come on—like what is it? First day in the IC, bro? I'm not in the IC. I'm not part of the government. I'm a towel. But anyway—so Aidan's bragging to Lindsey, and I don't think that was a very good idea. I mean, she's brilliant and stuff, but like—why would you ever say that to her? Don't say that stuff. But anyway—like, why would you say—even if it's your significant other—unless they are read-in on the intel that you are sharing—why would you ever, ever, ever share that with someone? It exposes them to an incredible liability—which, if you love them, don't do it. It also exposes your own credibility to an incredible risk of liability. You will never be trusted by the intelligence community again. Pillow talk and honeypots are how they trap operatives. If you chase sex, they will compromise you. How can you not understand that? So if you get compromised by someone who's not an agent—just someone who's your partner and you're just telling them stuff about protected federal investigations—what do you think your reputation is going to be like among the intelligence community when you're doing that and they haven't even honeypotted you? You just voluntarily started putting this shit in writing. They're going to look at you like you are out of your mind. So anyway—Karen Read apparently is telling Aidan Kearney that she's having ex parte conversations with Josh Levy. Now, the grand jury that Leslie was leaking from was impaneled in May of 2022 when Rachael Rollins used to be U.S. Attorney in Boston. Now think about this. In 2020, Rachael Rollins and Aidan Kearney—Rachael Rollins, a hyper-liberal known for her soft-on-crime stance. We'll also hear Rollins hated Michael Morrissey. Anyway, Rollins worked with Turtle Boy to send a Republican operative named Rayla Campbell to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events in the Senate race against Ed Markey so that Ed Markey could win the Senate seat. Now, interestingly enough, Rachael Rollins then got appointed to the position of U.S. Attorney right after that. And you might say: well, Grant, that's a stretch. No, no—because then within a few months, Rachael Rollins—part of the reason she gets thrown out of office by the DOJ OIG—is because she attends an event in Andover with—guess who?—Dr. Jill Biden, the wife of the then-president who appointed her. Now, what does that mean? Well, if you really think about the geopolitical implications of the 2020 Senate race between Ed Markey in Massachusetts and Joe Kennedy Jr.—well, one of the things you're going to realize is that—think about 2020. The leadership around Biden did not know that the chaos of 2024 was going to happen with Kamala and Biden not really being up to it. You're thinking ahead to 2024. Why? Who's your biggest target if you are a sitting Democrat and you're worried about a primary challenge four years from now? Well, what if JFK's—what is it—nephew or whatever it is—is in the House of Representatives? And what if JFK started his career in the House of Representatives? And what if that new young Kennedy with red hair and sort of a photogenic face? What if he is running for JFK's old Senate seat? What if he's on the same exact trajectory as JFK? Oh, we can't have that. We—as the Biden White House—cannot have Joe Kennedy Jr. beating Ed Markey for Senate. And how it got to the point that somebody talked to Rachael Rollins and she came up with the brilliant idea to reach out to Turtle Boy so that Turtle Boy would talk to Rayla Campbell to send her to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events to help Markey—I don't know. But that's why I think Rachael Rollins became U.S. Attorney—someone who, in my opinion, was uniquely unqualified and fundamentally unethically un-predisposed to being able to run that office. Who then in turn immediately tried to interfere in the 2022 Suffolk DA primary between Kevin Hayden and Ricardo O'Rourke—because Rollins wanted to see her progressive vision continue through O'Rourke—so she worked with Daniel Medwed—the same professor who was involved with advocating the media on behalf of Karen Read's team. She worked with Daniel Medwed to get a story leaked about how a non-existent federal probe into Kevin Hayden—to increase Ricardo O'Rourke's chances in the Suffolk DA primary. Sound familiar? Oh, hell yeah. So anyway—between November of 2022 and May of 2023—you got this weird situation where Rollins knows she's getting forced out; Levy's going to take over the office. The people who take Rollins out are Josh Levy, Bill Abley, and still head of the criminal division—Dustin Chao, I think—still head of the public integrity unit, and then executive officer who is also the press secretary or the communications director of the office. Those four people—without being named; they're named by title—were the people who cooperated with the DOJ to take Rollins out—DOJ-OIG to take Rollins out. Now, why is that interesting? Well, one—because it shows that people in that office knew that Rachael Rollins had a proclivity for weaponizing leaks about non-existent federal probes to interfere in particular district attorney races and matters. Second—Rachael Rollins and Michael Morrissey had a bifurcated history of ten years. One: Rachael Rollins had this list of 25 crimes she wouldn't prosecute, and other DAs critiqued her—not just Michael Morrissey but others. Rollins—I'm pretty sure—was the one who first called Morrissey a "meatball," in fact, because of his criticism of Rollins over that issue. Rachael Rollins—I think—has a proclivity, in my opinion, to hold a bit of a grudge. When she became U.S. Attorney and she realized she was on the way out—well, maybe the Sandra Birchmore probe started back in May of 2022 because former chief of the Canton police—Ken Berkowitz—went to the FBI and told them that the FBI covered up—the MSP unit detailed to the Norfolk DA covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder—potentially because Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning used to work in Stoughton with Matt Farwell and Robert Devine and Billy Farwell—I think they all worked there. And furthermore—that Brian Tully, the unit commander, was partners with John Fanning for 20 years. All right, and in that regard—it is very interesting, I think—that Chief Berkowitz—who may have been very offended that his unit... So Sandra Birchmore was murdered on February 1st, 2021, at 9:23 p.m. in her apartment in Canton. Okay—on February 4th, Monday in the morning—the Canton police do a wellness check after they get a call from her—Sandra's—colleagues at the school where she worked as an administrative assistant. Now the Canton police respond—on Monday, February 4th—by Wednesday, February 6th. The Canton police have collected the following evidence in order. And if you don't believe me, you can read pages—I think 97 through 101—of the Canton Police Department audit report released in April of 2025. Point by point. Number one: the Canton police confirm—via a witness who was the maintenance worker at Sandra's apartment building—that Matt Farwell was the man on camera outside Sandra's apartment in the elevator at 9:23 p.m. on February 1st—which is exactly when Sandra died. Two: that the man was Matt Farwell, and he was the same man who helped Sandra move into her apartment. Three: that when the Canton PD went to Sandra's school, they got information that Farwell was telling people that Sandra was pregnant with his child—that he had abused her since she was a child—and that he was going to quote "take care of the problem himself" if Sandra decided to carry the baby to term. All right. All of that information—by February 6th of 2021—was passed over to the MSP. John Fanning and this whole unit—I think—really then facilitate a report sometime over the next six to 12 months that exonerates Farwell and says Sandra dies from self-harm. Well, I think that's why Ken Berkowitz blew the whistle before he died of cancer—and that's why there was a grand jury impaneled in May of 2022—and it was really about the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. Well—one—it was about Sandra Birchmore's murder. Why does that make everything so interesting? Because I think that the investigation wasn't just about who killed Sandra and why—but how was it ruled a—the result of self-harm—instead of the very obvious murder that it was. Well—that starts—2022, I think—May of 2022—the grand jury. Jessica Leslie was on the grand jury—leaker—who's going to be sentenced on October 4th of 2025. I think Jessica Leslie—ladies and gentlemen—in August of 2022 somehow leaked to Karen Read—Alan Jackson—that the Norfolk DA was dirty because they covered up—and that MSP unit—because they covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder. All right—so therefore, Alan Jackson—that's the skeleton in the closet. It wasn't what the people in the house were doing. I'm still a little suspect of who they know—but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares—nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. The big issue is that Jen was friends with Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And they—I think—they brought on the PI—Marty Kraft—and Kate Peter—to insulate their exposure from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. And so they were worried. And who would you bring in if you had covered up a murder? If you were a MSP unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids—and I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck's the perfect person be like: "Bruh, if that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these like different people that get too close to this—or we're going to be exposed for Birchmore." But let me bring it back to the point here—which is in 2022, the feds clearly were starting to poke around. And come 2023—I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept up—even in light of the national spotlight? When you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement—but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation of Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her—but if you think about it in the context of: Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore—then you understand: Karen—that's why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them—the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did—to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway—and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA—destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly—and she's a tactical fucking genius. I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely—in my opinion—bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. If you don't know what a backhand is, folks—a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface because you're dealing with a very high-level operation like the state police—who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death. But really—you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out—from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together—and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got indicted. Now—it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: this is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power and who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said: Nope—it's out of your hands. And that's what Judge Doolin did today. Someone just needed to not either be involved with Karen Read, Aidan Kearney, or the Norfolk DA—or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft—and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses—I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there. But at least for Lindsey—Judge Doolin was like: enough of this nonsense. And that's why today was such a big deal in light of that historical context—because just tracing that very insidious pattern of events over the past 18 months—you can see this became a proxy war. It was Michael Morrissey on one side with his marching soldiers: Brian Tully, Kate Peter, Marty Kraft. And then it was Karen Read and the DOJ on the other side. Okay. And their soldiers were like the Free Karen Read movement and Turtle Boy and Natalie and all these other people. This was an intelligence community proxy war. And that's why I've been trying to tell people for so long: Lindsey Gaetani was not involved. She was an unwitting pawn. These two factions both took advantage of her—including Brian Tully—who was more interested in preserving his unit's reputation than actually defending the interest of the vulnerable. In my opinion, I think Brian Tully is a terrible person. Does that mean that he's a bad person for trying to hold Karen Read accountable for John O'Keefe's death? No, of course not. He's a bad person because in what fucking world do you—as a fucking state police officer—who you—you are entrusted—not just to get the bad guys—but to protect the most fucking vulnerable? One: how do you justify what happened with Sandra Birchmore? Two: how the fuck do you get it in your fucking mind that you're going to take a 15-year unredacted extraction of a fucking vulnerable victim's cell phone and release it to a fucking defendant known for promulgating exactly that material? What fucking headspace? What satanic fucking chamber do you and Kate Peter have to be drinking blood from fucking cups in to think that that's fucking okay? Fuck you. How do you even get in the headspace where doing something like that to a fucking victim becomes acceptable. The rot in that unit—whether enabled by Morrissey or whether he didn't know about it—I don't fucking know. But the point is: the rot in that unit was so deep that they lost their fucking souls. They didn't think of victims as victims. They re-victimized victims because it was a political fucking war—and these people are so hardened, I guess, that they don't understand what it means to be vulnerable. And these were police officers—detectives—people entrusted to uphold and protect the dignity of the most vulnerable—and they fucking used victims to advance some political agenda—to deal with the fact that they covered up a fucking murder. I'm done being gentle about this. Fuck these people. And I'm not saying that it was wrong for them to investigate Karen Read. I am pleased someone tried to prosecute her. I'm pissed at them because they were thinking about it from the perspective of their own liability for an unrelated case—and they fucked everything up—and introducing Kate Peter to this shit. Oh my God. It's a disgrace. It's a disgrace to the people who were hurt. It's a disgrace to the vulnerable. I frankly do not understand how Jen McCabe, Brian Tully, and Kate Peter go to bed each night. I don't get it. I don't know. Maybe there's something that shuts off the GABA-1 receptor or something and just makes you go to bed. I don't know. Never heard of such a thing. But I'm just saying: I don't know how you do it. How do you do it? But anyway—Judge Doolin—without giving a... extemporaneous, uh, bloviating cuss-based rant like I just did—instead, in my opinion, is like: fuck all of you! You're not being involved in this prosecution anymore. Someone's gonna protect this fucking woman—Lindsey Gaetani. I'm making you appoint someone! I love that man. Good for Judge Doolin. But still—we never should have gone to this point. This is incredible. With the... the... the MSP. The fact that they had a unit operating like this for so long. This is worse than what John Connolly and Whitey Bulger did. This is institutional rot that is so pervasive that it requires fundamental reform of the MSP. They're not incapable of—um, uh—solving crimes. I'm sure most of the MSP are wonderful. Anyway—my point is: I don't think the state police officers that I generally run into—or troopers—are bad people. I think most of them are wonderful. They've never been really mean to me. They do good work. They're out there protecting our roads. They stop people from speeding. They—what else do they do? They go after commercial truck violations. They investigate homicides—like, on the whole. And this is why I think we have to be careful about how we talk about this. I am not saying that the entire MSP is just rotten. I'm saying that when you have factions or sections within the institution that understand its machinations and are able to thus manipulate the bureaucratic structure and avoid accountability—you lose the confidence of everyone. And how do you think some of those good troopers feel when they have to go out there? Yes—people like me are going to smile at them and bless them and whatever—because I know they're not part of the problem. But most people look at them and they think that they're fucking hated. They don't deserve that. They literally put their lives on the line for us every day. And if we're going to give them the respect they deserve—if we're going to make the profession have the respect that it deserves—then this kind of institutional rot can't be looked at as just an embarrassment. And it can't be looked at as something that—oh, we just wish didn't happen. Maybe some guys are going to go away. No—you point at it. You scream it from the rooftops and you say: if this happens even once—then we have so failed as an institution; we must fundamentally reform from the ground up. And this wasn't just once. It was Birchmore. It was the phone extraction. It was the SA report leak over and over and over and over again. They knew the law. They were an old boys' club. They abused it. They had cover—and it was systemically enabled. And that's why I think—to save the profession of policing in Massachusetts—there needs to be a full-on unbridled discussion about how this happened—how the personalities involved were able to do what they did. And we can't be so tribalistic that because someone we support as to their views on one case, right? We cannot be so tribalistic that we just block out everything bad that they do. Or this rot will continue. And it is pernicious. It is insidious. It is invidious. It undermines the faith that citizens completely removed from this situation have in our system of government. It undermines victims' confidence in the ability to seek redress in the face of serious fucking harm—because they think the system doesn't actually care about them. It's just using them to get someone bigger. We cannot allow this to perpetuate. And the only way to fix it is to hold up situations like what happened to Birchmore—Sandra Birchmore—and what happened to Lindsey Gaetani—hold them up in the national spotlight—and say: we—the MSP—have failed you. Brian Tully failed these people. John Fanning failed these people. Nick Guarino failed these people. Yuri Bukhenik failed these people. We need to say that. We need to highlight it. We need to say: this happened even once. Therefore, we are not good enough. Not only are we not good enough—the very fact that either of these things were able to happen—the Birchmore cover-up, the phone extraction leak—is such a pervasive, systemic degradation of the faith that victims and the public have in the justice system—that our only option is to talk about this—congressional hearings. We need the State House to have congressional hearings. We need these people to answer for what they did. And we need to make sure it never happens again. And the only way you do that is by finding out what aspects of the bureaucratic structure allowed this to happen. And it's not going to be comfortable. I don't think it's going to be comfortable for anyone to talk about the fallout of any of this—but that's exactly what happened at the CCC on a smaller scale. And if this country matters—if this form of government matters—if this republic matters—then we will fix this. We will fix it together. We will address the hard questions. We will address the uncomfortable questions. We will shed our prejudices and polemical biases at the door. We will engage in no fear, no favoritism—and we will look only for the truth and nothing but it. And if you are incapable of doing that—you're contributing—either consciously or subconsciously—to the problem. It's our only option. And you can't just say: because they prosecuted Karen Read, we can't talk about anything bad that they did. That's tribalism. That's polemical. That's what drove us to this point.

Alright, here's the epic towel rant from tonight; And so that's what kind of tipped me off in real time. I was like: wait a minute. Is Judge Doolin ruling from the bench right now? And then I was like: wait a minute. He's ruling from the bench and ordering them to appoint a new prosecutor and potentially the Attorney General. Oh my word. How—what is this? I—this wasn't on my bingo card. Even now I'm just like: Oh my God, I can't believe he did that. Judge Doolin—in a good way. I'm just like: Oh my God, there is hope. And then to follow it up with: "Oh yeah, I'm thinking about a hearing on the contempt." Oh my God—you're telegraphing. You're going to have a contempt hearing after the Attorney General is potentially on the case. The other witnesses, however, are left in this position where they have this kind of not really well-funded—like kind of spastic prosecution, like the special prosecutors on the Kearney cases. Then you got the December 23rd, 2023 criminal charges against Aidan that were charged in Dedham District Court, 23rd or 26th or so. And that was for illegally—allegedly—recording Lindsey Gaetani and then submitting an edited version of the recording into court for some reason. I don't know why Aidan did that, especially apparently when there's an original version of the recording pursuant to some of the statements in court. And then also for intimidating Lindsey—for allegedly going over there on December 23rd, 2023—against Karen Read's advice and against his lawyers' advice, apparently, according to a leaked group chat message from Facebook in 2024—in May of 2024—going over to Lindsey's apartment. And then according to the affidavit from the search warrant for Karen Read's cell phone—allegedly telling Lindsey that she shouldn't cooperate with the grand jury. She should—she could remove information from her phone or something—that Aidan would get her a lawyer, but only if she agreed to meet with a lawyer only with him present, because she had, quote, "broken his trust." It just like—wild stuff. And that new grand jury, by the way, was apparently—it did go forward. And then in time it came out that it—that was about Karen and Aidan and witness intimidation and conspiracy, because Aidan Kearney—between October and November—really August and November of 2023—it started telling Lindsey Gaetani about his communications with Karen Read that included—in writing—Exhibit O to Karen Read search warrant affidavit, which says that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that in November of 2023—November 28, 2023, to be specific—that Karen Read told Aidan Kearney that Karen Read and her team at ex parte conversations with former U.S. Attorney Josh Levy—which was right in the window of time that Jessica Leslie, the grand juror leaker, was leaking information. Leslie started leaking in August of 2022—which is the same month that Alan Jackson joined Karen Read's legal team. And Josh Levy—who was one of the U.S. Attorneys in charge of that grand jury—Leslie was leaking about four different cases: probably the Birchmore case, definitely the Read and O'Keefe case, definitely the CDL case. One more case. We can't really—the group of us journalists involved in this—can't really figure out. So right in the middle of that—November of 2023—Josh Levy is leaking ex parte grand jury information to Karen Read, which she's putting—she's telling Aidan Kearney about; he's putting it in writing. He just was trying to just show off for Lindsey, but you don't like—come on—like what is it? First day in the IC, bro? I'm not in the IC. I'm not part of the government. I'm a towel. But anyway—so Aidan's bragging to Lindsey, and I don't think that was a very good idea. I mean, she's brilliant and stuff, but like—why would you ever say that to her? Don't say that stuff. But anyway—like, why would you say—even if it's your significant other—unless they are read-in on the intel that you are sharing—why would you ever, ever, ever share that with someone? It exposes them to an incredible liability—which, if you love them, don't do it. It also exposes your own credibility to an incredible risk of liability. You will never be trusted by the intelligence community again. Pillow talk and honeypots are how they trap operatives. If you chase sex, they will compromise you. How can you not understand that? So if you get compromised by someone who's not an agent—just someone who's your partner and you're just telling them stuff about protected federal investigations—what do you think your reputation is going to be like among the intelligence community when you're doing that and they haven't even honeypotted you? You just voluntarily started putting this shit in writing. They're going to look at you like you are out of your mind. So anyway—Karen Read apparently is telling Aidan Kearney that she's having ex parte conversations with Josh Levy. Now, the grand jury that Leslie was leaking from was impaneled in May of 2022 when Rachael Rollins used to be U.S. Attorney in Boston. Now think about this. In 2020, Rachael Rollins and Aidan Kearney—Rachael Rollins, a hyper-liberal known for her soft-on-crime stance. We'll also hear Rollins hated Michael Morrissey. Anyway, Rollins worked with Turtle Boy to send a Republican operative named Rayla Campbell to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events in the Senate race against Ed Markey so that Ed Markey could win the Senate seat. Now, interestingly enough, Rachael Rollins then got appointed to the position of U.S. Attorney right after that. And you might say: well, Grant, that's a stretch. No, no—because then within a few months, Rachael Rollins—part of the reason she gets thrown out of office by the DOJ OIG—is because she attends an event in Andover with—guess who?—Dr. Jill Biden, the wife of the then-president who appointed her. Now, what does that mean? Well, if you really think about the geopolitical implications of the 2020 Senate race between Ed Markey in Massachusetts and Joe Kennedy Jr.—well, one of the things you're going to realize is that—think about 2020. The leadership around Biden did not know that the chaos of 2024 was going to happen with Kamala and Biden not really being up to it. You're thinking ahead to 2024. Why? Who's your biggest target if you are a sitting Democrat and you're worried about a primary challenge four years from now? Well, what if JFK's—what is it—nephew or whatever it is—is in the House of Representatives? And what if JFK started his career in the House of Representatives? And what if that new young Kennedy with red hair and sort of a photogenic face? What if he is running for JFK's old Senate seat? What if he's on the same exact trajectory as JFK? Oh, we can't have that. We—as the Biden White House—cannot have Joe Kennedy Jr. beating Ed Markey for Senate. And how it got to the point that somebody talked to Rachael Rollins and she came up with the brilliant idea to reach out to Turtle Boy so that Turtle Boy would talk to Rayla Campbell to send her to Joe Kennedy Jr.'s events to help Markey—I don't know. But that's why I think Rachael Rollins became U.S. Attorney—someone who, in my opinion, was uniquely unqualified and fundamentally unethically un-predisposed to being able to run that office. Who then in turn immediately tried to interfere in the 2022 Suffolk DA primary between Kevin Hayden and Ricardo O'Rourke—because Rollins wanted to see her progressive vision continue through O'Rourke—so she worked with Daniel Medwed—the same professor who was involved with advocating the media on behalf of Karen Read's team. She worked with Daniel Medwed to get a story leaked about how a non-existent federal probe into Kevin Hayden—to increase Ricardo O'Rourke's chances in the Suffolk DA primary. Sound familiar? Oh, hell yeah. So anyway—between November of 2022 and May of 2023—you got this weird situation where Rollins knows she's getting forced out; Levy's going to take over the office. The people who take Rollins out are Josh Levy, Bill Abley, and still head of the criminal division—Dustin Chao, I think—still head of the public integrity unit, and then executive officer who is also the press secretary or the communications director of the office. Those four people—without being named; they're named by title—were the people who cooperated with the DOJ to take Rollins out—DOJ-OIG to take Rollins out. Now, why is that interesting? Well, one—because it shows that people in that office knew that Rachael Rollins had a proclivity for weaponizing leaks about non-existent federal probes to interfere in particular district attorney races and matters. Second—Rachael Rollins and Michael Morrissey had a bifurcated history of ten years. One: Rachael Rollins had this list of 25 crimes she wouldn't prosecute, and other DAs critiqued her—not just Michael Morrissey but others. Rollins—I'm pretty sure—was the one who first called Morrissey a "meatball," in fact, because of his criticism of Rollins over that issue. Rachael Rollins—I think—has a proclivity, in my opinion, to hold a bit of a grudge. When she became U.S. Attorney and she realized she was on the way out—well, maybe the Sandra Birchmore probe started back in May of 2022 because former chief of the Canton police—Ken Berkowitz—went to the FBI and told them that the FBI covered up—the MSP unit detailed to the Norfolk DA covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder—potentially because Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning used to work in Stoughton with Matt Farwell and Robert Devine and Billy Farwell—I think they all worked there. And furthermore—that Brian Tully, the unit commander, was partners with John Fanning for 20 years. All right, and in that regard—it is very interesting, I think—that Chief Berkowitz—who may have been very offended that his unit... So Sandra Birchmore was murdered on February 1st, 2021, at 9:23 p.m. in her apartment in Canton. Okay—on February 4th, Monday in the morning—the Canton police do a wellness check after they get a call from her—Sandra's—colleagues at the school where she worked as an administrative assistant. Now the Canton police respond—on Monday, February 4th—by Wednesday, February 6th. The Canton police have collected the following evidence in order. And if you don't believe me, you can read pages—I think 97 through 101—of the Canton Police Department audit report released in April of 2025. Point by point. Number one: the Canton police confirm—via a witness who was the maintenance worker at Sandra's apartment building—that Matt Farwell was the man on camera outside Sandra's apartment in the elevator at 9:23 p.m. on February 1st—which is exactly when Sandra died. Two: that the man was Matt Farwell, and he was the same man who helped Sandra move into her apartment. Three: that when the Canton PD went to Sandra's school, they got information that Farwell was telling people that Sandra was pregnant with his child—that he had abused her since she was a child—and that he was going to quote "take care of the problem himself" if Sandra decided to carry the baby to term. All right. All of that information—by February 6th of 2021—was passed over to the MSP. John Fanning and this whole unit—I think—really then facilitate a report sometime over the next six to 12 months that exonerates Farwell and says Sandra dies from self-harm. Well, I think that's why Ken Berkowitz blew the whistle before he died of cancer—and that's why there was a grand jury impaneled in May of 2022—and it was really about the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. Well—one—it was about Sandra Birchmore's murder. Why does that make everything so interesting? Because I think that the investigation wasn't just about who killed Sandra and why—but how was it ruled a—the result of self-harm—instead of the very obvious murder that it was. Well—that starts—2022, I think—May of 2022—the grand jury. Jessica Leslie was on the grand jury—leaker—who's going to be sentenced on October 4th of 2025. I think Jessica Leslie—ladies and gentlemen—in August of 2022 somehow leaked to Karen Read—Alan Jackson—that the Norfolk DA was dirty because they covered up—and that MSP unit—because they covered up Sandra Birchmore's murder. All right—so therefore, Alan Jackson—that's the skeleton in the closet. It wasn't what the people in the house were doing. I'm still a little suspect of who they know—but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares—nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. The big issue is that Jen was friends with Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And they—I think—they brought on the PI—Marty Kraft—and Kate Peter—to insulate their exposure from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. And so they were worried. And who would you bring in if you had covered up a murder? If you were a MSP unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids—and I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck's the perfect person be like: "Bruh, if that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these like different people that get too close to this—or we're going to be exposed for Birchmore." But let me bring it back to the point here—which is in 2022, the feds clearly were starting to poke around. And come 2023—I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept up—even in light of the national spotlight? When you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement—but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation of Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her—but if you think about it in the context of: Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore—then you understand: Karen—that's why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them—the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did—to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway—and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA—destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly—and she's a tactical fucking genius. I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely—in my opinion—bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. If you don't know what a backhand is, folks—a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface because you're dealing with a very high-level operation like the state police—who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death. But really—you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out—from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together—and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got indicted. Now—it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: this is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power and who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said: Nope—it's out of your hands. And that's what Judge Doolin did today. Someone just needed to not either be involved with Karen Read, Aidan Kearney, or the Norfolk DA—or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft—and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses—I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there. But at least for Lindsey—Judge Doolin was like: enough of this nonsense. And that's why today was such a big deal in light of that historical context—because just tracing that very insidious pattern of events over the past 18 months—you can see this became a proxy war. It was Michael Morrissey on one side with his marching soldiers: Brian Tully, Kate Peter, Marty Kraft. And then it was Karen Read and the DOJ on the other side. Okay. And their soldiers were like the Free Karen Read movement and Turtle Boy and Natalie and all these other people. This was an intelligence community proxy war. And that's why I've been trying to tell people for so long: Lindsey Gaetani was not involved. She was an unwitting pawn. These two factions both took advantage of her—including Brian Tully—who was more interested in preserving his unit's reputation than actually defending the interest of the vulnerable. In my opinion, I think Brian Tully is a terrible person. Does that mean that he's a bad person for trying to hold Karen Read accountable for John O'Keefe's death? No, of course not. He's a bad person because in what fucking world do you—as a fucking state police officer—who you—you are entrusted—not just to get the bad guys—but to protect the most fucking vulnerable? One: how do you justify what happened with Sandra Birchmore? Two: how the fuck do you get it in your fucking mind that you're going to take a 15-year unredacted extraction of a fucking vulnerable victim's cell phone and release it to a fucking defendant known for promulgating exactly that material? What fucking headspace? What satanic fucking chamber do you and Kate Peter have to be drinking blood from fucking cups in to think that that's fucking okay? Fuck you. How do you even get in the headspace where doing something like that to a fucking victim becomes acceptable. The rot in that unit—whether enabled by Morrissey or whether he didn't know about it—I don't fucking know. But the point is: the rot in that unit was so deep that they lost their fucking souls. They didn't think of victims as victims. They re-victimized victims because it was a political fucking war—and these people are so hardened, I guess, that they don't understand what it means to be vulnerable. And these were police officers—detectives—people entrusted to uphold and protect the dignity of the most vulnerable—and they fucking used victims to advance some political agenda—to deal with the fact that they covered up a fucking murder. I'm done being gentle about this. Fuck these people. And I'm not saying that it was wrong for them to investigate Karen Read. I am pleased someone tried to prosecute her. I'm pissed at them because they were thinking about it from the perspective of their own liability for an unrelated case—and they fucked everything up—and introducing Kate Peter to this shit. Oh my God. It's a disgrace. It's a disgrace to the people who were hurt. It's a disgrace to the vulnerable. I frankly do not understand how Jen McCabe, Brian Tully, and Kate Peter go to bed each night. I don't get it. I don't know. Maybe there's something that shuts off the GABA-1 receptor or something and just makes you go to bed. I don't know. Never heard of such a thing. But I'm just saying: I don't know how you do it. How do you do it? But anyway—Judge Doolin—without giving a... extemporaneous, uh, bloviating cuss-based rant like I just did—instead, in my opinion, is like: fuck all of you! You're not being involved in this prosecution anymore. Someone's gonna protect this fucking woman—Lindsey Gaetani. I'm making you appoint someone! I love that man. Good for Judge Doolin. But still—we never should have gone to this point. This is incredible. With the... the... the MSP. The fact that they had a unit operating like this for so long. This is worse than what John Connolly and Whitey Bulger did. This is institutional rot that is so pervasive that it requires fundamental reform of the MSP. They're not incapable of—um, uh—solving crimes. I'm sure most of the MSP are wonderful. Anyway—my point is: I don't think the state police officers that I generally run into—or troopers—are bad people. I think most of them are wonderful. They've never been really mean to me. They do good work. They're out there protecting our roads. They stop people from speeding. They—what else do they do? They go after commercial truck violations. They investigate homicides—like, on the whole. And this is why I think we have to be careful about how we talk about this. I am not saying that the entire MSP is just rotten. I'm saying that when you have factions or sections within the institution that understand its machinations and are able to thus manipulate the bureaucratic structure and avoid accountability—you lose the confidence of everyone. And how do you think some of those good troopers feel when they have to go out there? Yes—people like me are going to smile at them and bless them and whatever—because I know they're not part of the problem. But most people look at them and they think that they're fucking hated. They don't deserve that. They literally put their lives on the line for us every day. And if we're going to give them the respect they deserve—if we're going to make the profession have the respect that it deserves—then this kind of institutional rot can't be looked at as just an embarrassment. And it can't be looked at as something that—oh, we just wish didn't happen. Maybe some guys are going to go away. No—you point at it. You scream it from the rooftops and you say: if this happens even once—then we have so failed as an institution; we must fundamentally reform from the ground up. And this wasn't just once. It was Birchmore. It was the phone extraction. It was the SA report leak over and over and over and over again. They knew the law. They were an old boys' club. They abused it. They had cover—and it was systemically enabled. And that's why I think—to save the profession of policing in Massachusetts—there needs to be a full-on unbridled discussion about how this happened—how the personalities involved were able to do what they did. And we can't be so tribalistic that because someone we support as to their views on one case, right? We cannot be so tribalistic that we just block out everything bad that they do. Or this rot will continue. And it is pernicious. It is insidious. It is invidious. It undermines the faith that citizens completely removed from this situation have in our system of government. It undermines victims' confidence in the ability to seek redress in the face of serious fucking harm—because they think the system doesn't actually care about them. It's just using them to get someone bigger. We cannot allow this to perpetuate. And the only way to fix it is to hold up situations like what happened to Birchmore—Sandra Birchmore—and what happened to Lindsey Gaetani—hold them up in the national spotlight—and say: we—the MSP—have failed you. Brian Tully failed these people. John Fanning failed these people. Nick Guarino failed these people. Yuri Bukhenik failed these people. We need to say that. We need to highlight it. We need to say: this happened even once. Therefore, we are not good enough. Not only are we not good enough—the very fact that either of these things were able to happen—the Birchmore cover-up, the phone extraction leak—is such a pervasive, systemic degradation of the faith that victims and the public have in the justice system—that our only option is to talk about this—congressional hearings. We need the State House to have congressional hearings. We need these people to answer for what they did. And we need to make sure it never happens again. And the only way you do that is by finding out what aspects of the bureaucratic structure allowed this to happen. And it's not going to be comfortable. I don't think it's going to be comfortable for anyone to talk about the fallout of any of this—but that's exactly what happened at the CCC on a smaller scale. And if this country matters—if this form of government matters—if this republic matters—then we will fix this. We will fix it together. We will address the hard questions. We will address the uncomfortable questions. We will shed our prejudices and polemical biases at the door. We will engage in no fear, no favoritism—and we will look only for the truth and nothing but it. And if you are incapable of doing that—you're contributing—either consciously or subconsciously—to the problem. It's our only option. And you can't just say: because they prosecuted Karen Read, we can't talk about anything bad that they did. That's tribalism. That's polemical. That's what drove us to this point.

Grant Smith Ellis

41,546 views • 11 months ago

🚨EXPOSED: How Tyler Bowyer is ALLEGEDLY Using TPUSA Donor Money to SEIZE the Utility that Stole His FAMILY'S Land. Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of Turning Point Action Tyler Bowyer is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing Turning Point Action's donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta with the SRP (Salt River Project) and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. Myself and MIA have been pulling countless court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and corporate filings. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of Turning Point USA donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. 🚨 THE BIGGEST POLITICAL HEIST IN AMERICA IS BEING RUN BY ONE MAN, AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT. 🚨 Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of a massive conservative PAC is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing the Turning Point PAC (Turning Point Action) donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta, potentially orchestrate a massive real estate payday for his own family, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. And he is trampling on the memory of the movement's founder to do it. We have spent weeks pulling court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and photographs. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of PAC donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. PART 2: THE 20-YEAR VENDETTA & THE "EASEMENT" PAYOFF [THE FACTS]:Tyler Bowyer omitted a massive, damning conflict of interest from the press and his donors. His grandfather, Ray Leonard Bowyer, worked for SRP for 25 years in the Water Operations Division. But it gets much darker. We pulled Maricopa County Superior Court minute entries and legal notices (Case No. CV2005-003419). In 2005, SRP filed an Eminent Domain lawsuit against Ray L. Bowyer, acting as the Trustee of his family’s trust. SRP forcefully condemned and seized Parcel No. 304-64-010B from the Bowyer family. U.S. Home Corp (a massive developer) was a co-defendant. The court minute entries reveal a legal slaughter: SRP aggressively changed judges right out of the gate. At the final hearing, SRP brought their top Senior Engineer, Freddie Dobbins Jr., to testify to the "necessity" of taking the land. The Bowyer family didn't even show up. They were unrepresented and steamrolled by the utility's legal machine. Crucially, the court records we have obtained thus far do not specify whether SRP used eminent domain to seize the full property outright, or if they only took a portion of it by forcing an "easement" across the land. [THE SPECULATION]:SRP didn't just take a piece of dirt; they destroyed a multi-million dollar family real estate deal. If SRP only forced an easement, the Bowyer family trust is still legally and financially tethered to that land. We theorize that Tyler Bowyer is weaponizing millions in unsuspecting PAC donor money to execute a hostile takeover of the utility that humiliated his family. If his slate wins, his family will be sitting across the negotiating table from people he put in power. That board can authorize massive payouts to buy the rest of the land, renegotiate the easement terms, or route new infrastructure through it. Tyler Bowyer's family could come out with a huge, undisclosed real estate payday funded by the very utility he is taking over. PART 3: THE TROJAN HORSE [THE FACTS]:Look at the top of the ticket that Bowyer's PAC endorsed. He is pushing Chris Dobson for SRP President. Chris Dobson is not a grassroots outsider—he is the current Vice President of the Salt River Project. [THE SPECULATION]:This is a corporate inside job. Bowyer isn't fighting the establishment; he is buying the boardroom. He is laundering political influence through his PAC to elevate the ultimate company insider, turning a public-private utility into a captive asset. PART 4: THE ULTIMATE DISRESPECT (THE MEMORIAL EXPLOITATION) [THE FACTS]:On September 21, 2025, a memorial was held in Glendale for Charlie Kirk. Photographs from the event show that Turning Point Action set up voter registration booths right at the memorial. The booths featured massive banners reading "CHARLIE WANTS YOU TO REGISTER TO VOTE" and were actively used to register attendees for the obscure SRP board elections. [THE SPECULATION]:This is where the moral bankruptcy of this syndicate is fully exposed. It is wrong on so many levels. While everyday conservatives and loved ones were mourning the tragic loss of a movement leader, Tyler Bowyer and TPAction were exploiting the crowd. Instead of worrying about memorializing Charlie with the respect he deserved, they were concerned with selling merch and using a funeral as a voter-harvesting event for their corporate utility takeover. They hijacked a tragedy to fund a family vendetta. PART 5: THE DOUBLE PAYOFF (THE SLUSH FUNDS) If Bowyer successfully uses Turning Point Donor money to win this board, he doesn't just get revenge—he unlocks two massive, multi-million dollar slush funds for his allies. PAYOUT 1: THE GRID [THE FACTS]: Erika Kirk (CEO of TPUSA) has a mother named Lori Frantzve. Lori Frantzve is the CEO of AZ Tech International and G-TEK Industries. Her specialty? EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) protection and grid hardening. She has formally pitched the Arizona State Legislature on this exact need. [THE SPECULATION]: The newly installed, Bowyer-controlled board could turn around and award massive, multi-million dollar "Grid Hardening" contracts directly to the mother of TPUSA’s CEO. PAYOUT 2: THE 20-YEAR FORESTRY EMPIRE [THE FACTS]: We pulled a 2019 U.S. Senate Committee Statement regarding SRP. SRP doesn't just manage water; they heavily influence the management of a 13,000 square-mile watershed spanning five national forests. The document reveals that SRP signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) ensuring they get to "participate in the development... and review the selected contractors" for massive 20-year federal forest thinning projects. Just clearing the tiny Cragin watershed alone is estimated at $27 million. Furthermore, SRP lobbies for contracts to be paid out based on "avoided costs" (hypothetical prevented disaster savings) rather than the actual value of timber removed. [THE SPECULATION]: Whoever controls the SRP board controls the gatekeeping for 20-year federal forestry contracts. This is the ultimate untraceable government payout. Tyler Bowyer's syndicate can funnel tens of millions in federal land management contracts to allied construction and clearing firms using these "cost avoidance" metrics. PART 6: THE CORPORATE ARCHITECTURE & THE MORMON MAFIA [THE FACTS]:The Farnsworth family is a deeply entrenched network in Mesa, Arizona, and they provide the connective tissue for this entire operation: Jessica A. Farnsworth is currently a Process Analyst inside SRP. Chase Farnsworth is a Project Development Executive at Mortenson (a massive commercial construction firm), publicly monitoring and praising SRP's water releases. Dwayne Farnsworth is a corporate agent located right on Dobson Road. [THE SPECULATION]:To execute a takeover this large and route billions in grid hardening and federal forestry contracts, you need insiders, corporate builders, and legislative muscle. The Farnsworth network provides the architecture for Bowyer to move the money once the board is captured. THE BOTTOM LINE Conservative donors thought they were funding a grassroots PAC to save America. Instead, the evidence suggests their money is being used by Tyler Bowyer as a personal slush fund to execute a 20-year-old real estate revenge plot, launder political power for utility insiders, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in federal forestry and grid resilience contracts. And they are willing to step over Charlie's memorial to do it. The movement has been hijacked by one man running a corporate syndicate. It's time to follow the money, audit the grid contracts, and subpoena the watershed MOAs. 🇺🇸⚓️ Huge shoutout to the AMAZING MIA Who who teamed uop with me on this MASSIVE story. She's one of the best researchers out there and everyone should be FOLLOWING her!

🚨EXPOSED: How Tyler Bowyer is ALLEGEDLY Using TPUSA Donor Money to SEIZE the Utility that Stole His FAMILY'S Land. Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of Turning Point Action Tyler Bowyer is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing Turning Point Action's donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta with the SRP (Salt River Project) and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. Myself and MIA have been pulling countless court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and corporate filings. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of Turning Point USA donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. 🚨 THE BIGGEST POLITICAL HEIST IN AMERICA IS BEING RUN BY ONE MAN, AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT. 🚨 Listen to us very closely. While the media has you distracted by Washington D.C., the self-proclaimed COO of a massive conservative PAC is quietly attempting to hijack an infrastructure empire in the American Southwest. This isn't a grassroots movement. This is Tyler Bowyer weaponizing the Turning Point PAC (Turning Point Action) donor treasury to execute a 20-year-old family vendetta, potentially orchestrate a massive real estate payday for his own family, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in state and federal contracts. He is using your donor money to buy a boardroom. And he is trampling on the memory of the movement's founder to do it. We have spent weeks pulling court documents, obituaries, federal Senate testimonies, and photographs. We are going to lay out exactly how Tyler Bowyer’s operation works. To protect ourselves from the legal hitmen these organizations employ, we are going to be crystal clear about what is DOCUMENTED FACT and what is INVESTIGATIVE SPECULATION. Read it, save it, and decide for yourselves. Here is the complete anatomy of the Salt River Project (SRP) Syndicate. 📉🕵️‍♂️ PART 1: THE FRONT AND THE LIE [THE FACTS]:On April 7, 2026, the Salt River Project (SRP) is holding a board election. SRP is a quasi-governmental powerhouse that controls five hydroelectric plants, a nuclear generating station, coal-fired plants, 1,200 miles of canals, and the water/power supply for over 2 million people. Tyler Bowyer, as the COO of Turning Point Action, is pouring massive amounts of PAC donor money into this obscure, low-turnout race. Bowyer explicitly told Axios that Turning Point "hasn't endorsed anyone," claiming the PAC is just there to register voters and stop "Green New Deal policies". He also publicly allied with Arizonans for Responsible Growth, a PAC run by Jimmy Lindblom—a heavy-construction company executive. However, despite Bowyer claiming no endorsements to the press, he and TPAction distributed official promotional graphics explicitly stating: "TURNING POINT ACTION ENDORSED" featuring a specific slate of candidates: Chris Dobson, Barry Paceley, Rusty Kennedy, and Kelly Cooper. [THE SPECULATION]:Why is the COO of a national youth conservative organization teaming up with a commercial construction executive to win a utility board? Because this isn't about the "Green New Deal." It’s about Tyler Bowyer using PAC money to decide who gets to act as the gatekeeper for billions of dollars in federal and state infrastructure contracts. PART 2: THE 20-YEAR VENDETTA & THE "EASEMENT" PAYOFF [THE FACTS]:Tyler Bowyer omitted a massive, damning conflict of interest from the press and his donors. His grandfather, Ray Leonard Bowyer, worked for SRP for 25 years in the Water Operations Division. But it gets much darker. We pulled Maricopa County Superior Court minute entries and legal notices (Case No. CV2005-003419). In 2005, SRP filed an Eminent Domain lawsuit against Ray L. Bowyer, acting as the Trustee of his family’s trust. SRP forcefully condemned and seized Parcel No. 304-64-010B from the Bowyer family. U.S. Home Corp (a massive developer) was a co-defendant. The court minute entries reveal a legal slaughter: SRP aggressively changed judges right out of the gate. At the final hearing, SRP brought their top Senior Engineer, Freddie Dobbins Jr., to testify to the "necessity" of taking the land. The Bowyer family didn't even show up. They were unrepresented and steamrolled by the utility's legal machine. Crucially, the court records we have obtained thus far do not specify whether SRP used eminent domain to seize the full property outright, or if they only took a portion of it by forcing an "easement" across the land. [THE SPECULATION]:SRP didn't just take a piece of dirt; they destroyed a multi-million dollar family real estate deal. If SRP only forced an easement, the Bowyer family trust is still legally and financially tethered to that land. We theorize that Tyler Bowyer is weaponizing millions in unsuspecting PAC donor money to execute a hostile takeover of the utility that humiliated his family. If his slate wins, his family will be sitting across the negotiating table from people he put in power. That board can authorize massive payouts to buy the rest of the land, renegotiate the easement terms, or route new infrastructure through it. Tyler Bowyer's family could come out with a huge, undisclosed real estate payday funded by the very utility he is taking over. PART 3: THE TROJAN HORSE [THE FACTS]:Look at the top of the ticket that Bowyer's PAC endorsed. He is pushing Chris Dobson for SRP President. Chris Dobson is not a grassroots outsider—he is the current Vice President of the Salt River Project. [THE SPECULATION]:This is a corporate inside job. Bowyer isn't fighting the establishment; he is buying the boardroom. He is laundering political influence through his PAC to elevate the ultimate company insider, turning a public-private utility into a captive asset. PART 4: THE ULTIMATE DISRESPECT (THE MEMORIAL EXPLOITATION) [THE FACTS]:On September 21, 2025, a memorial was held in Glendale for Charlie Kirk. Photographs from the event show that Turning Point Action set up voter registration booths right at the memorial. The booths featured massive banners reading "CHARLIE WANTS YOU TO REGISTER TO VOTE" and were actively used to register attendees for the obscure SRP board elections. [THE SPECULATION]:This is where the moral bankruptcy of this syndicate is fully exposed. It is wrong on so many levels. While everyday conservatives and loved ones were mourning the tragic loss of a movement leader, Tyler Bowyer and TPAction were exploiting the crowd. Instead of worrying about memorializing Charlie with the respect he deserved, they were concerned with selling merch and using a funeral as a voter-harvesting event for their corporate utility takeover. They hijacked a tragedy to fund a family vendetta. PART 5: THE DOUBLE PAYOFF (THE SLUSH FUNDS) If Bowyer successfully uses Turning Point Donor money to win this board, he doesn't just get revenge—he unlocks two massive, multi-million dollar slush funds for his allies. PAYOUT 1: THE GRID [THE FACTS]: Erika Kirk (CEO of TPUSA) has a mother named Lori Frantzve. Lori Frantzve is the CEO of AZ Tech International and G-TEK Industries. Her specialty? EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) protection and grid hardening. She has formally pitched the Arizona State Legislature on this exact need. [THE SPECULATION]: The newly installed, Bowyer-controlled board could turn around and award massive, multi-million dollar "Grid Hardening" contracts directly to the mother of TPUSA’s CEO. PAYOUT 2: THE 20-YEAR FORESTRY EMPIRE [THE FACTS]: We pulled a 2019 U.S. Senate Committee Statement regarding SRP. SRP doesn't just manage water; they heavily influence the management of a 13,000 square-mile watershed spanning five national forests. The document reveals that SRP signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) ensuring they get to "participate in the development... and review the selected contractors" for massive 20-year federal forest thinning projects. Just clearing the tiny Cragin watershed alone is estimated at $27 million. Furthermore, SRP lobbies for contracts to be paid out based on "avoided costs" (hypothetical prevented disaster savings) rather than the actual value of timber removed. [THE SPECULATION]: Whoever controls the SRP board controls the gatekeeping for 20-year federal forestry contracts. This is the ultimate untraceable government payout. Tyler Bowyer's syndicate can funnel tens of millions in federal land management contracts to allied construction and clearing firms using these "cost avoidance" metrics. PART 6: THE CORPORATE ARCHITECTURE & THE MORMON MAFIA [THE FACTS]:The Farnsworth family is a deeply entrenched network in Mesa, Arizona, and they provide the connective tissue for this entire operation: Jessica A. Farnsworth is currently a Process Analyst inside SRP. Chase Farnsworth is a Project Development Executive at Mortenson (a massive commercial construction firm), publicly monitoring and praising SRP's water releases. Dwayne Farnsworth is a corporate agent located right on Dobson Road. [THE SPECULATION]:To execute a takeover this large and route billions in grid hardening and federal forestry contracts, you need insiders, corporate builders, and legislative muscle. The Farnsworth network provides the architecture for Bowyer to move the money once the board is captured. THE BOTTOM LINE Conservative donors thought they were funding a grassroots PAC to save America. Instead, the evidence suggests their money is being used by Tyler Bowyer as a personal slush fund to execute a 20-year-old real estate revenge plot, launder political power for utility insiders, and capture the gatekeeping authority for billions of dollars in federal forestry and grid resilience contracts. And they are willing to step over Charlie's memorial to do it. The movement has been hijacked by one man running a corporate syndicate. It's time to follow the money, audit the grid contracts, and subpoena the watershed MOAs. 🇺🇸⚓️ Huge shoutout to the AMAZING MIA Who who teamed uop with me on this MASSIVE story. She's one of the best researchers out there and everyone should be FOLLOWING her!

Project Constitution

129,996 views • 5 months ago

🎙️ Charlamagne Tha God & The Breakfast Club Call Out Media Lies Defends DJ Akademiks…. Charlamagne Also Allegedly Mentions By The End Of The Year He Will Let It Be Known If He’s In The Illuminati 👀🤔 Context: During a live Twitch stream, Charlamagne and The Breakfast Club discussed media credibility, calling out bloggers and personalities who spread misinformation. When DJ Akademiks’ name popped up in the chat, Charlamagne stopped everything to address it directly. 🔹 KEY MOMENTS & QUOTES 🕐 Trust in Media Charlamagne explains that this isn’t about giving “false stories” attention it’s about helping audiences recognize who’s credible in today’s media landscape, especially on YouTube and social platforms. 🕐 Why Some Platforms Don’t Grow “You wonder why you’re not growing… it’s because people can’t trust you.” Charlamagne says real growth comes from getting it right more than wrong, not chasing clicks. 🕐 The Attention Addiction He calls out blogs that lie for headlines, saying many mistake attention for real success, confusing viral moments with actual influence. 🕐 Call Out the Liars Charlamagne challenges the chat to name names, stressing that audiences already know who lies they just keep consuming it anyway. 🔥 DJ AKADEMIKS MOMENT 🕐 Charlamagne on Akademiks “Y’all saying Akademiks that’s not true. Ak is more right than he is wrong.” Charlamagne explains: •Akademiks actually reaches out to labels and people close to situations •He gets information from real industry sources •Having an opinion ≠ lying This moment clearly separates opinions vs misinformation. 🕐 Bias Acknowledged Charlamagne admits Akademiks rides for Drake but says that doesn’t invalidate his reporting. 📊 MEDIA METRICS & RATINGS TALK 🕐 Radio & Ratings Explained Charlamagne breaks down how demographics and ratings really work, calling out people who talk numbers without understanding them. 🕐 Advertisers Care About Demos Advertisers spend money based on specific demographics, not internet narratives. 🏆 THE BREAKFAST CLUB LEGACY 15 Years Strong The Breakfast Club celebrates: •15 years on air •#1 in multiple demos •Still evolving while others fade 🔮 BIG PICTURE MESSAGE 2025: Year of the Snake Charlamagne says 2025 is about: •Shedding what no longer serves you •Endings leading to new beginnings •Karma, transition, and growth 🎯 FINAL TAKEAWAY ✔️ Credibility > Clicks ✔️ Opinions aren’t lies ✔️ Real media sources do the work ✔️ Stop hating on who you should be learning from Notable Moment: Charlamagne publicly co-signing DJ Akademiks as a reliable source more often than not stood out especially in today’s messy media climate. IN CLIP 2 👁️ Charlamagne Continues His Constant Saying Of Illuminati “Confirmations” Coming Before Year’s End 👀 Context: During a live moment on The Breakfast Club, Charlamagne addressed ongoing Illuminati jokes and conspiracy talk and left listeners with a wild tease. 🔥 KEY MOMENTS 🗣️ Charlamagne Tha God: “All Illuminati confirmations will be confirmed before the year is over. I just want y’all to know that.” He follows up with gratitude and perspective, saluting everyone doing their thing and reminding others that losing a position can be divine redirection, not failure. 🙏 MESSAGE BEHIND THE JOKE ✔️ God’s plan > public opinion ✔️ New endings create new beginnings ✔️ Success for you even if you wish me the opposite Charlamagne makes it clear: He’s not naming names, not switching energy, and not feeding internet narratives. 👀 DJ ENVY REACTS 🗣️ DJ Envy: “Whatever you doing in the Illuminati, you gotta tell me… You bending over? If they need an intern, I don’t mind.” The room erupts as the moment turns into classic Breakfast Club humor. 🎯 TAKEAWAY Whether serious or sarcasm, Charlamagne once again: • Controls the narrative • Keeps people guessing • Turns conspiracy talk into engagement 👀

🎙️ Charlamagne Tha God & The Breakfast Club Call Out Media Lies Defends DJ Akademiks…. Charlamagne Also Allegedly Mentions By The End Of The Year He Will Let It Be Known If He’s In The Illuminati 👀🤔 Context: During a live Twitch stream, Charlamagne and The Breakfast Club discussed media credibility, calling out bloggers and personalities who spread misinformation. When DJ Akademiks’ name popped up in the chat, Charlamagne stopped everything to address it directly. 🔹 KEY MOMENTS & QUOTES 🕐 Trust in Media Charlamagne explains that this isn’t about giving “false stories” attention it’s about helping audiences recognize who’s credible in today’s media landscape, especially on YouTube and social platforms. 🕐 Why Some Platforms Don’t Grow “You wonder why you’re not growing… it’s because people can’t trust you.” Charlamagne says real growth comes from getting it right more than wrong, not chasing clicks. 🕐 The Attention Addiction He calls out blogs that lie for headlines, saying many mistake attention for real success, confusing viral moments with actual influence. 🕐 Call Out the Liars Charlamagne challenges the chat to name names, stressing that audiences already know who lies they just keep consuming it anyway. 🔥 DJ AKADEMIKS MOMENT 🕐 Charlamagne on Akademiks “Y’all saying Akademiks that’s not true. Ak is more right than he is wrong.” Charlamagne explains: •Akademiks actually reaches out to labels and people close to situations •He gets information from real industry sources •Having an opinion ≠ lying This moment clearly separates opinions vs misinformation. 🕐 Bias Acknowledged Charlamagne admits Akademiks rides for Drake but says that doesn’t invalidate his reporting. 📊 MEDIA METRICS & RATINGS TALK 🕐 Radio & Ratings Explained Charlamagne breaks down how demographics and ratings really work, calling out people who talk numbers without understanding them. 🕐 Advertisers Care About Demos Advertisers spend money based on specific demographics, not internet narratives. 🏆 THE BREAKFAST CLUB LEGACY 15 Years Strong The Breakfast Club celebrates: •15 years on air •#1 in multiple demos •Still evolving while others fade 🔮 BIG PICTURE MESSAGE 2025: Year of the Snake Charlamagne says 2025 is about: •Shedding what no longer serves you •Endings leading to new beginnings •Karma, transition, and growth 🎯 FINAL TAKEAWAY ✔️ Credibility > Clicks ✔️ Opinions aren’t lies ✔️ Real media sources do the work ✔️ Stop hating on who you should be learning from Notable Moment: Charlamagne publicly co-signing DJ Akademiks as a reliable source more often than not stood out especially in today’s messy media climate. IN CLIP 2 👁️ Charlamagne Continues His Constant Saying Of Illuminati “Confirmations” Coming Before Year’s End 👀 Context: During a live moment on The Breakfast Club, Charlamagne addressed ongoing Illuminati jokes and conspiracy talk and left listeners with a wild tease. 🔥 KEY MOMENTS 🗣️ Charlamagne Tha God: “All Illuminati confirmations will be confirmed before the year is over. I just want y’all to know that.” He follows up with gratitude and perspective, saluting everyone doing their thing and reminding others that losing a position can be divine redirection, not failure. 🙏 MESSAGE BEHIND THE JOKE ✔️ God’s plan > public opinion ✔️ New endings create new beginnings ✔️ Success for you even if you wish me the opposite Charlamagne makes it clear: He’s not naming names, not switching energy, and not feeding internet narratives. 👀 DJ ENVY REACTS 🗣️ DJ Envy: “Whatever you doing in the Illuminati, you gotta tell me… You bending over? If they need an intern, I don’t mind.” The room erupts as the moment turns into classic Breakfast Club humor. 🎯 TAKEAWAY Whether serious or sarcasm, Charlamagne once again: • Controls the narrative • Keeps people guessing • Turns conspiracy talk into engagement 👀

Cousin Tino ™️

33,992 views • 8 months ago

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If you’re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Mello’s affidavit. It’s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didn’t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Mello’s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I don’t know. What the fuck do I know? I’m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peter’s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means I’m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, that’s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kate’s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindsey’s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aiden’s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peter’s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, “Why are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.” Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, let’s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged in—and I think it was Kate actually who did it—but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if that’s what happened with Leigha—I don’t know, I wasn’t around—not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, it’s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one would—it’s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just don’t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, don’t fucking do it. Please don’t do it. I don’t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I don’t understand why people justify it. Oh, it’s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. It’s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Don’t do it back. Just stop. It’s ridiculous. Steph's like—"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I don’t know what to tell you. You don’t have to call her that, but I’m going to do that, right? And I’m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what I’m saying? Even while you’re on your break. By the way, Steph, I’m just going to break here just posting things, right? And I’m saying I’m not even supposed to be riled up right now. We’re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. I’m just a little towel. I’m on one, you know what I’m saying? Absolutely not. I don’t know which Steph you are. I don’t know if you’re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. You’re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I’m going to triple down. I’m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. I’ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, it’s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, she’s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, that’s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and I’m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. It’s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you don’t want to be talked about in public. That’s the reality. Is that not right Steph, you’re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, who’s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to people’s reports in this chat, and you feel that it’s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because you’re biased, right? Fine, I don’t care. I’ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Let’s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. That’s correct. I don’t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, let’s be clear. I wouldn’t say you’re debating me, Steph. You can’t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. It’s almost like there’s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peter’s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And you’re not going to be able to do anything about it—oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "what’s wrong with towel, Steph?" You’re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, “What is Grant doing?” because I won’t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody else’s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And there’s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. I’m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? We’ll do it. No, no, I’m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. I’m loyal to truth. I’m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. I’m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, let’s go with that. Yep, let’s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. That’s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctor’s family’s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? I’ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. She’s riling me up. You’re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what I’m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if you’re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. You’ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesn’t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because we’re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. I’ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Don’t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I don’t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinely—not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, “He won’t know.” What, are you just going to tell me I’m the greatest thing ever and then it’s going to go along? I’m just saying, I’ve been posting on social media being like, “Aidan, if people tell you that you’re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because they’re moles.” Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What I’m concerned about, okay—I’m not concerned about who you are as a person. I’m concerned about what you didn’t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, what’s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetani’s—see what I’m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for you—Lindsey Gaetani’s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. That’s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. It’s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. That’s just odd. Like she’s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one who’s a second cousin of John O’Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. That’s what I’m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, bro—if you are that Steph—you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute—are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was not—I didn’t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John O’Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I don’t even have—no, that is not the question I’m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John O’Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, it’s not the same Steph. It’s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. I’m rolling my eyes so hard I’m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If you’re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. You’re bothering me. If you bother me too much, I’m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So it’s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldn’t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which I’m doing. You haven’t addressed one element of it on substance. All you’ve done is gaslight, and frankly you’re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, don’t be discriminatory; two, don’t be derogatory; three, don’t sealion; four, don’t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jay’s like, “I’m aboard the Grant train.” Thanks, Jay. It wasn’t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the fact—please address why Kate Peter’s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned over—despite the fact that it wasn’t a full turnover of emails—in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peter—now we know from these documents—directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didn’t include Leigha Genduso’s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you can’t address it on merit, you can’t, because you’re not here to do that, are you? You’re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, I’ll continue reading. It’ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. I’ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. I’ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didn’t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you don’t know and don’t care, that’s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you can’t address any of this on merit. You don’t know the factual record. You’re getting humiliated. And furthermore, I’m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, that’s not—hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindsey’s phone when they did the extraction, she couldn’t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didn’t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldn’t have tipped Kate’s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you don’t care about the filings, you don’t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, we’re done. Oh, it’s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. We’ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? I’m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just don’t—I don’t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Br… every possible perspective. I don’t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. It’s not that. I’ll never ever have a problem with that. It’s the bad faith—and it’s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. You’ve never done it—but it’s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still don’t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope that—I hope that tells us all something. But yes, let’s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we were—I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very last—so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like that’s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middle—that’s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, that—I don’t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinks—who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think he’s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently she’s a big advocate of prednisone. I don’t really understand. She’s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they can’t use cannabis. I’m baffled by it. I didn’t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether she’s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because I’ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, she’s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peter’s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about and she doesn’t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesn’t own it.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,617 views • 9 months ago

"Multiple members of Congress received a briefing from an agency task force (it's the FBI). All of that info. will be declassified, and the stuff that we saw [that] we can't explain." ~Luna (I think Luna did an excellent job on tonight's Real Time - Overtime with Bill Maher. Transcript and my thoughts below.) ~ Bill Maher: "The first question is for you. Do you think we are headed, Congresswoman, for a full disclosure and transparency about UAPs, which we used to call UFOs? I do. I mean, I think it was just this week, didn't they start a website for releasing this information?" Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: "From my understanding, they're gonna put it on the National Archives (website), but if they've booked the website... So I actually head up the Disclosure Task Force in Congress on Declassification of Federal Secrets. And what I will tell you is, there's something..." Maher: "So that's why you know so much stuff (audience laughs)? I see." Luna: "(laughs) I'm a nerd. In all seriousness, there's some things that we can't explain, and there is a problem with over-classification. But also, when you have duly-elected members of Congress being denied access, that's a problem, because we're supposed to be the, you know, check and balance on some of these agencies. And so, you'll see some interesting stuff. The federal government will ever come out and tell you what to believe." Maher: "I think they're here." Luna: "Well, there's definitely stuff that we can't explain." Maher: "I'm not shy about it." Paul Begala: "I'm still searching for intelligent life on Earth, so I'll be very (audience and Luna laugh)... I'm not into that." (Begala saying he's, "not into that" most likely means he's ignorant on the subject. IMO, anybody who takes the time to look at the decades of evidence, with an open mind, will be "into" the possibility that another intelligence is sharing this planet with us.) Luna: "I think we're in a big Universe." Maher: "Well, you may not be into that, but they're into you, okay?" Begala: "Ohhh." Maher: "I mean, whether you want [to] believe it or not, things..." Begala: "Why do they always put the probes there? If they're that sophisticated, can't they just like, scan us or something?" (Maybe they're trying to extract semen from a prostate orgasm to help with their hybrid/breeding program? Not a new theory.) Maher: "But, you know, but see, there's...okay. But if you want to be serious about it, there was an era where we heard a lot about probing. That ended." (Has it ended? I'd love to hear from experiencers and people like hypnotherapist/researcher, Yvonne Smith, who works with experiencers, to hear what people are saying about their experiences nowadays.) Maher: "Because, I mean, we never heard about any of it before we got nuclear weapons. Right after the nuclear bomb went off in 1945, suddenly, the aliens were like, maybe we ought to pay attention to these people." (Not exactly true.) Luna: "Well, there were reports of sightings and whatnot dating back into even, you know, for many, many, many, many centuries." Maher: "If you're talking about some of the stuff like what we see in the hieroglyphics and drawings, it could be, yes, it could be like they built the pyramids. That's true." (Absolutely no need to jump to the hypothesis that whatever is here (aliens?) built the pyramids. We just know that sightings and abduction cases go back to before the atomic age.) Luna: "Well, I think that there's a lot of theories, but based on what we're seeing, evidence-wise, there is one specific agency where multiple members of Congress, to include myself, received a briefing from. All of that information will be declassified, and the stuff that we saw in that briefing we can't explain." (Luna has spoken to Matt Laslo and others about being briefed by the FBI about UAP but the FBI effort was first reported in February 2025 by Politico: "FBI agents who are part of a secretive group investigating the surge of 'unidentified anomalous phenomena,' what the government uses to refer to UFOs... "The existence of the FBI’s informal working group on the issue has not been disclosed publicly before." Link to article in replies... ~~~ Maher: "But, I mean, if I can get back to the anal probing, um...." (Everybody laughs/smiles.) Luna: "Odd topic." Maher: "It seems like there was a time where they needed to do that to find out about if they...I mean, like so many people have this, almost the exact same recollection. Maybe it's some psychological phenomenon that we don't realize, but people, independently, seem to have this kind of vague memory, and (laughs) they lost a little track of time. Maybe it was the GHB (date-rape drug. ~Joe), I don't know (audience laughs). But, it seemed like the aliens were trying to find out: What makes these people tick? Who are these humans? And then, I think, they got that information. "And in the last ten, twenty, years, it's not been that. What it's been has been very, very serious people. I'm talking about military people, who are constantly saying, 'We see things we cannot explain. Either China has a weapon we don't know about, which is unlikely, or it's just something you're gonna have to tell me what it is.' (Very serious (including military) people have been reporting these things for decades. It's just getting a lot more coverage in the media now, and more people who have had access to classified data are speaking up.) Luna: "What we've seen in the briefings... And I actually asked this question to Secretary Clinton, as she was actually going to, had she won her election, be in charge of disclosure and actually releasing some of this information. And she thinks that the American people - I think this is one of the most bipartisan things in Congress, currently, and bicameral in the Senate as well - but we should be able to release the information that we have, specifically pertaining to this and let the American people decide what it is. "Look, some of it is balloons, some of it is drones, and then there's a portion of it that we can't explain where you have credible people from all walks of life confirming it. And I will tell you, based on the evidence that we have seen, there's something there." Maher: "And credible people, not just in the military, but in government, including Democrats." Begala: "I was struck by what President Obama said, and I agree with it. The vastness of the Universe is such that the arithmetic makes it pretty likely." Maher: "Right!" Begala: "And, the vastness of the Universe is such, it's pretty unlikely that we're gonna cross paths. And I think that's also true." (Well, as I've said (and others have, too), we don't know if "they" (whatever "they" turns out to be) are traveling any great distance to get here or need to "cross paths" with us. They may have been here the entire time and consider Earth their home, just like we do.) Begala: "I mean, it's just, it seems to... I'm a skeptic, but I like what you're doing, Congresswoman. Put it all out, let people decide. I'm a skeptic. Maybe you can persuade me?" Luna: "I think this gets into a deeper...if you have time listen to the Joe Rogan podcast I did. But this gets into a deeper discussion on where you are at ,spiritually. And I think there's just a lot that we have, and can't explain." (IMO, I don't think our spiritual beliefs or "where you are at, spiritually," has anything to do with what we're dealing with. As I've said before, I think the phenomenon is just part of the natural world that we don't yet understand or comprehend.) Luna: "But look, my biggest concern and why I got involved is because I had the Department of Defense at the time tell me that we were not allowed access, and I have the highest clearance possible." (She has a TS-SCI clearance. That doesn't mean she has access to, or is read into, every compartment where various Special Access Programs (SAPs) reside, or that she has a need-to-know for everything. Some feel every member of Congress should have access to everything. Others disagree. We've also heard about the DoE, which, supposedly, has their own levels of clearance. Also, in 2020, as I worked on my Wilson/Davis MegBlog, I made a cold call to someone who was the executive secretary of the Special Access Program Oversight Committee in the mid-90s.) ~Begin MegaBlog Excerpt~ "I spoke with a former military man mentioned in the Wilson/Davis documents who, in theory, also should have had access to every SAP during a specific portion of his time with the government. He told me, "that there may be levels of secrecy people don’t know about." ~End MegaBlog Excerpt~ ~~~ Luna: So if you have a duly-membered, elected-member of government - not just myself, but other members - being denied access, you have this aspect of then, who's really in control? If we're writing the checks, if you have the Pentagon failing audits...denying access, this is a problem. And so, there is this aspect of government transparency, going back to, how do we actually fix this country, and you have to start with transparency." Begala: "I'm with you on that." (Audience applauds.)

"Multiple members of Congress received a briefing from an agency task force (it's the FBI). All of that info. will be declassified, and the stuff that we saw [that] we can't explain." ~Luna (I think Luna did an excellent job on tonight's Real Time - Overtime with Bill Maher. Transcript and my thoughts below.) ~ Bill Maher: "The first question is for you. Do you think we are headed, Congresswoman, for a full disclosure and transparency about UAPs, which we used to call UFOs? I do. I mean, I think it was just this week, didn't they start a website for releasing this information?" Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: "From my understanding, they're gonna put it on the National Archives (website), but if they've booked the website... So I actually head up the Disclosure Task Force in Congress on Declassification of Federal Secrets. And what I will tell you is, there's something..." Maher: "So that's why you know so much stuff (audience laughs)? I see." Luna: "(laughs) I'm a nerd. In all seriousness, there's some things that we can't explain, and there is a problem with over-classification. But also, when you have duly-elected members of Congress being denied access, that's a problem, because we're supposed to be the, you know, check and balance on some of these agencies. And so, you'll see some interesting stuff. The federal government will ever come out and tell you what to believe." Maher: "I think they're here." Luna: "Well, there's definitely stuff that we can't explain." Maher: "I'm not shy about it." Paul Begala: "I'm still searching for intelligent life on Earth, so I'll be very (audience and Luna laugh)... I'm not into that." (Begala saying he's, "not into that" most likely means he's ignorant on the subject. IMO, anybody who takes the time to look at the decades of evidence, with an open mind, will be "into" the possibility that another intelligence is sharing this planet with us.) Luna: "I think we're in a big Universe." Maher: "Well, you may not be into that, but they're into you, okay?" Begala: "Ohhh." Maher: "I mean, whether you want [to] believe it or not, things..." Begala: "Why do they always put the probes there? If they're that sophisticated, can't they just like, scan us or something?" (Maybe they're trying to extract semen from a prostate orgasm to help with their hybrid/breeding program? Not a new theory.) Maher: "But, you know, but see, there's...okay. But if you want to be serious about it, there was an era where we heard a lot about probing. That ended." (Has it ended? I'd love to hear from experiencers and people like hypnotherapist/researcher, Yvonne Smith, who works with experiencers, to hear what people are saying about their experiences nowadays.) Maher: "Because, I mean, we never heard about any of it before we got nuclear weapons. Right after the nuclear bomb went off in 1945, suddenly, the aliens were like, maybe we ought to pay attention to these people." (Not exactly true.) Luna: "Well, there were reports of sightings and whatnot dating back into even, you know, for many, many, many, many centuries." Maher: "If you're talking about some of the stuff like what we see in the hieroglyphics and drawings, it could be, yes, it could be like they built the pyramids. That's true." (Absolutely no need to jump to the hypothesis that whatever is here (aliens?) built the pyramids. We just know that sightings and abduction cases go back to before the atomic age.) Luna: "Well, I think that there's a lot of theories, but based on what we're seeing, evidence-wise, there is one specific agency where multiple members of Congress, to include myself, received a briefing from. All of that information will be declassified, and the stuff that we saw in that briefing we can't explain." (Luna has spoken to Matt Laslo and others about being briefed by the FBI about UAP but the FBI effort was first reported in February 2025 by Politico: "FBI agents who are part of a secretive group investigating the surge of 'unidentified anomalous phenomena,' what the government uses to refer to UFOs... "The existence of the FBI’s informal working group on the issue has not been disclosed publicly before." Link to article in replies... ~~~ Maher: "But, I mean, if I can get back to the anal probing, um...." (Everybody laughs/smiles.) Luna: "Odd topic." Maher: "It seems like there was a time where they needed to do that to find out about if they...I mean, like so many people have this, almost the exact same recollection. Maybe it's some psychological phenomenon that we don't realize, but people, independently, seem to have this kind of vague memory, and (laughs) they lost a little track of time. Maybe it was the GHB (date-rape drug. ~Joe), I don't know (audience laughs). But, it seemed like the aliens were trying to find out: What makes these people tick? Who are these humans? And then, I think, they got that information. "And in the last ten, twenty, years, it's not been that. What it's been has been very, very serious people. I'm talking about military people, who are constantly saying, 'We see things we cannot explain. Either China has a weapon we don't know about, which is unlikely, or it's just something you're gonna have to tell me what it is.' (Very serious (including military) people have been reporting these things for decades. It's just getting a lot more coverage in the media now, and more people who have had access to classified data are speaking up.) Luna: "What we've seen in the briefings... And I actually asked this question to Secretary Clinton, as she was actually going to, had she won her election, be in charge of disclosure and actually releasing some of this information. And she thinks that the American people - I think this is one of the most bipartisan things in Congress, currently, and bicameral in the Senate as well - but we should be able to release the information that we have, specifically pertaining to this and let the American people decide what it is. "Look, some of it is balloons, some of it is drones, and then there's a portion of it that we can't explain where you have credible people from all walks of life confirming it. And I will tell you, based on the evidence that we have seen, there's something there." Maher: "And credible people, not just in the military, but in government, including Democrats." Begala: "I was struck by what President Obama said, and I agree with it. The vastness of the Universe is such that the arithmetic makes it pretty likely." Maher: "Right!" Begala: "And, the vastness of the Universe is such, it's pretty unlikely that we're gonna cross paths. And I think that's also true." (Well, as I've said (and others have, too), we don't know if "they" (whatever "they" turns out to be) are traveling any great distance to get here or need to "cross paths" with us. They may have been here the entire time and consider Earth their home, just like we do.) Begala: "I mean, it's just, it seems to... I'm a skeptic, but I like what you're doing, Congresswoman. Put it all out, let people decide. I'm a skeptic. Maybe you can persuade me?" Luna: "I think this gets into a deeper...if you have time listen to the Joe Rogan podcast I did. But this gets into a deeper discussion on where you are at ,spiritually. And I think there's just a lot that we have, and can't explain." (IMO, I don't think our spiritual beliefs or "where you are at, spiritually," has anything to do with what we're dealing with. As I've said before, I think the phenomenon is just part of the natural world that we don't yet understand or comprehend.) Luna: "But look, my biggest concern and why I got involved is because I had the Department of Defense at the time tell me that we were not allowed access, and I have the highest clearance possible." (She has a TS-SCI clearance. That doesn't mean she has access to, or is read into, every compartment where various Special Access Programs (SAPs) reside, or that she has a need-to-know for everything. Some feel every member of Congress should have access to everything. Others disagree. We've also heard about the DoE, which, supposedly, has their own levels of clearance. Also, in 2020, as I worked on my Wilson/Davis MegBlog, I made a cold call to someone who was the executive secretary of the Special Access Program Oversight Committee in the mid-90s.) ~Begin MegaBlog Excerpt~ "I spoke with a former military man mentioned in the Wilson/Davis documents who, in theory, also should have had access to every SAP during a specific portion of his time with the government. He told me, "that there may be levels of secrecy people don’t know about." ~End MegaBlog Excerpt~ ~~~ Luna: So if you have a duly-membered, elected-member of government - not just myself, but other members - being denied access, you have this aspect of then, who's really in control? If we're writing the checks, if you have the Pentagon failing audits...denying access, this is a problem. And so, there is this aspect of government transparency, going back to, how do we actually fix this country, and you have to start with transparency." Begala: "I'm with you on that." (Audience applauds.)

Joe Murgia

146,499 views • 5 months ago