Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
New take on the pro-life vs. pro-choice debate
594,543 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
11 Yorum

And ask them if they support IVF. Because all the embryos that aren’t used, get trashed.

Come to think of it, the child wouldn't be arrested for k*lling the mother whilst in the womb, should the child survive, either 🤔

They’ll just say they don’t believe in twins, utero, or eating. A left voter doesn’t stand a chance.

Not being "pro-life" (I hate this term so much!) here, but this is a stupid argument... You wouldn't put a baby on trial for anything, so why would you convict a fetus? The most that can happen is the parents being put on trial, IF they were negligent, whis is not the case here

You just know the republicans watching this are going to be so triggered they will come out with a new bill in parliament asking to arrest twin babies who killed their twin in the womb

Chief Justice John Roberts says corporations and fetuses have the kind of rights that should require birth certificate.

Don’t be the dad without life insurance. Get same-day coverage with Ethos life insurance.

Done this. It works.

Stupid argument. That's an unconscious process. Tragic but not punishable. If an electrical cord from an iron was hanging off a counter and a baby pulled it down and it landed on the head and killed another baby, would we arrest the baby for pulling the cord? No.

This is one of those things that will surely catch someone off guard but it is easily challengeable and refutable.

Don’t worry, you’re safe. You can still murder your babies. You can convince other women to murder their babies. They’ll be plenty of murdered babies for your enjoyment.



