Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
NEW: Tim Pool exposes how Facebook’s algorithm purposely fed an entire generation a false narrative about police brutality. And it started earlier than you think. “At the end of the 2000s on Facebook, the top content was police brutality.” Tim Pool said one of the top websites in the... show more
170,485 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
11 Kommentare
More stories: Ukraine Reportedly Tried to Attack Putin’s Helicopter Mid-Flight in Huge Conflict-Altering Incident
Christian Rally in Seattle Park Attacked by Violent Woke Mob
Like the plot to a dystopian movie, New York will now monitor social media writings, collect data, and use law enforcement to crack down on any expression it deems to be hate speech.
@Timcast Facebook must be held accountable.
@Timcast They didn’t just manipulate the narrative they programmed outrage. While truth took a backseat, algorithms drove division, and the consequences are still tearing communities apart. Accountability for Big Tech is long overdue.
@Timcast But Zuck said he's sorry so all good, right...🙄
@Timcast He's right, I remember and local news stations as well
@Timcast ...and it is still happening.
@Timcast Life would be better without algorithms and computers.
@Timcast I wish there was a jail for moral depravity because here is an example, selling a false narrative and all of what that engenders(hate, violence, even murder) in order to drum up business.
@Timcast Those racist bastards. Go to @policelawnews and you'll see all races in police encounters. Not just BLACK folks
Ähnliche Videos
![James Fox just revealed that real-life Men in Black covered up the most groundbreaking UFO footage ever. In 1997, a Vietnam vet got high-quality video of a massive black UFO in Phoenix, Arizona. A City Councilwoman asked him to see it. Then, two men showed up to his house in an unmarked government car and took the video. Fox: “I investigated the Phoenix Lights case … working with a councilwoman, Frances Emma Barwood.” “I was interviewing all the witnesses and there was one guy, a Vietnam vet.” “He contacted Frances Barwood—one of the few elected officials that was willing to [say], ‘let’s investigate what happened, what these people saw.’” “He said … ‘I was on my roof that night trying to get a video on a tripod of the Hale-Bopp comet … and I have a CB radio and I was listening to the truckers come up Interstate 10 from Tucson, and they were all describing this massive boomerang-shaped craft … and I filmed it going right over the top of my house.’” “She’s like, ‘I’d love to see it.’” “So they make arrangements where he was gonna drop it off at her office.” “I don’t know if it was later that day or the very next morning or that night, two men roll up in an unmarked government vehicle in suits.” “They’re like, ‘we’re from Frances Emma Barwood’s office. We’re here to pick up the video.’” “And he says the only question they asked is, did he make any copies? And he said no.” “They took the footage and left.” “A couple days go by, he doesn’t hear from Emma, so he calls her up.” “He goes, ‘what’d you think of the footage?’” “She goes, ‘what do you mean? … I didn’t get the footage.’” “He goes, ‘you had two men from your office show up.’” “She goes, ‘I didn’t send anybody.’” “That was like the first time that I really heard about these so-called men in black, and that was in the 90s.” James Fox Jesse Michels](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2003146046671671450/amplify_video_thumb/2003145909002022912/img/wrrOR-CUsn9pwzbi.jpg)
![Walter Hill on why the absence of big names made a huge difference to 'The Warriors' (1979): "One of the things that I was pleased about doing 'The Warriors' (1979) was that it didn’t lend itself to star casting. That at makes a big difference, especially when it comes to putting movies together timewise. We had free reign in casting the film. I told the studio that I wanted to do a movie with an all-black cast, but they would not go for that, and I think in the end they were right because the film becomes more universalized, more timeless, and a more magical world in that you have gangs who don’t look like what real gangs did. But at the same time there is a hint of social reality, so there’s a mix of social reality and fantasy. I think the interracial casting helped that. We were finding the movie." ('Walter Hill - The Cinema of Hollywood Maverick', Wayne Byrne, 2022) [P.S: On this day, 47 years ago, 'The Warriors' (1979) was released in Australia]](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2018051730315804816/amplify_video_thumb/2017999396424822784/img/ohU-Ei4Hkjd1HoUj.jpg)
!["I'm still a little suspicious of who they know, but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares. Nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. "The big issue is that Jen was friends with Brian Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And I think they brought on the PI, Marty Kraft, and Kate Peter to insulate their exposure [as to Sandra Birchmore] from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. "Therefore, I think what Alan Jackson's actual plan was—I don't think he ever said this, but this is what I think he was up to. I think Alan Jackson was using the fact that this unit had to sense that the more attention got paid to them, the more the microscope of national and international focus zeroed in on Norfolk County, Massachusetts, the more likely it was that Sandra Birchmore's grave was going to become the locus of the investigatory scrutiny. And that is why I believe they had something to hide. Tully had something to hide. Fanning had something to hide. Yuri had something to hide. Guarino had something to hide, although I'm pretty sure they made him do it. They had something to hide, in my opinion. And so they were worried. "And who would you bring in? If you had covered up a murder—if you were a state police unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids. And I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck is the perfect person? Be like, 'If that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these different people who get too close to this, or we're going to get our spot blown up here—not literally, figuratively. We're going to be exposed for what we did with Birchmore.'" "That's what really pisses me off. Like, that it's so hardened. It's such a jaded fucking view of the world. It's like people who leverage children to stay in other people's lives. Okay, they're the sickest, most demented humans, especially if they're only not in jail because they gave people up or something like that for serious drug crimes. And then they walk around like sanctimonious hypocrites. That's the only type of person in the world that I loathe more than someone who would knowingly try to manipulate a public narrative to insulate a state police unit from accountability for covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder. It's the lowest, most disgusting, most base form of existence. It requires one to have literally numbed their soul to the point where you can sleep at night, having participated in that. I don't think there's enough alcohol, drugs, or sedatives in the world that could make me sleep if I was a party to such a thing. And I question how some of these people do it. "But let me bring it back to the point here, which is: In 2022, the feds clearly—I believe—were starting to poke around. And come 2023, I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept alive, even in light of the national spotlight? "When you think about it from that perspective—when you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation on Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her. But if you think about it in the context that Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore, then you understand why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them, the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway, and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA. It destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly, and she's a tactical fucking genius. "I'm fully of the opinion that Karen Read staged a fake falling out with Natalie so that Natalie would get in the orbit of the MSP in June, July, and August of 2023 and feed information back to Karen. Likewise, I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the criminal prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely, in my opinion, bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. "If you don't know what a backhand is, folks, a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface, because you're dealing with a very, very high-level operation like the state police, who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death, but really you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together, and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got wind of it and died. "Now it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: This is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power—who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said, "Nope, it's out of your hands." And that's what Judge Doolin did today. The exposure potential—someone just needed to not be involved with Karen Read, Kearney, or the Norfolk DA, or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft, and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses, I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there, but at least for Lindsey Gaetani, Judge Doolin said, 'enough of this nonsense.'"](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1971224663935025588/amplify_video_thumb/1971224278365265920/img/-xkeU1RSHb9v3nSr.jpg)
![Whitney Webb gives insight into Trump and the Palantir "Panopticon" being built: "Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir...most people know they're doing that with ICE, but the administration [has] announced... they're doing it for everybody." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Sabrina Salvati (Sabby Sabs) posted to Rumble on August 14, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir. Of course most people know that they're doing that with ICE, but the administration announced not that long ago that they're doing it for everybody. And Palantir also manages all of your health data, because they contract extensively with hhs. "So this is very concerning for a lot of reasons. One, one point on that I would point to is, held Trump in his first term. There was the spate of mass shootings I believe in the Latter Half of 2019. And Trump called on social media companies to stop shooting, stop shooters before they commit a crime and to basically flag what people were saying on social media and use that to determine if they, you know, if they, if there should be intervention before a crime might be committed. "Actually William Barr, when he was in office the first time, created this program that legalized pre-crime in the United States. And I think I was like one of two people maybe that reported on that at the time. It was called deep. And there's been a few arrests under DEEP for people making Facebook posts and things like that, but not that many. "But the legal framework has been there since you know, Trump round one, basically. But anyway, this pitch to that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to you know, bring about some sort of pre-crime society. He was being pitched at the time and he was interested in it, but it didn't ultimately happen, in creating this agency called HARPA, which was supposed to be like the health version of the Pentagon's DARPA and the, the program that they wanted to start with, the acronym was Safe Homes and it was basically about analyzing American social media posts for early warning signs of neuropsychiatric violence. And then based on that, would, would either you know, send people to a court ordered psychologist or physician or even you know, house arrest, without them having committed any crime. "So now that we have Big Tech even more intertwined with Trump Round two, you know, people should really be paying attention to the stuff, especially now that Palantir, especially through the Doge, formerly led by Elon Musk Agency Has sort of embedded Palantir in even more aspects of the government than it was in before, including like the IRS and you know, mortgage stuff like Fannie Mae and all of that. You know, all have Palantir now. And then basically giving them the keys to the kingdom with a lot of you know, data that the Department of Treasury has about your finances in the irs and all of that, you know, all of this is going to go into this master database. "And the goal of Palantir, just like it was with total information awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre crime. And Palantir did that, you know, for a few years, several years, in police departments around the country piloting predictive policing programs which is pre- crime, in mainly low income minority neighborhoods, starting off in New Orleans. And now you have other companies besides Palantir that do this. There's one in LA called PredPol, and they have an accuracy of half a percent and they haven't gotten rid of the contract. "So it's not really about better, more efficient policing. I mean that's what it's going to be sold as. It's basically the idea that was developed, you know, by the, the British for prison designs in the 1800s, the Panopticon. The idea that if people feel like they're constantly under watch and something and they could, you know, be you know, well, obviously out of the prison context, you could be put in prison for doing the wrong thing or whatever. You know, then people will police themselves if they're under constant, if they know they're under constant watch, they will police themselves, they will censor themselves, things of that nature. And I think ultimately that's the form of control it is about."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1956420626840744287/amplify_video_thumb/1956417425261391872/img/q_ub6x_Fm0nxHGZh.jpg)
Sensitive content
Whitney Webb gives insight into Trump and the Palantir "Panopticon" being built: "Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir...most people know they're doing that with ICE, but the administration [has] announced... they're doing it for everybody." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Sabrina Salvati (Sabby Sabs) posted to Rumble on August 14, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir. Of course most people know that they're doing that with ICE, but the administration announced not that long ago that they're doing it for everybody. And Palantir also manages all of your health data, because they contract extensively with hhs. "So this is very concerning for a lot of reasons. One, one point on that I would point to is, held Trump in his first term. There was the spate of mass shootings I believe in the Latter Half of 2019. And Trump called on social media companies to stop shooting, stop shooters before they commit a crime and to basically flag what people were saying on social media and use that to determine if they, you know, if they, if there should be intervention before a crime might be committed. "Actually William Barr, when he was in office the first time, created this program that legalized pre-crime in the United States. And I think I was like one of two people maybe that reported on that at the time. It was called deep. And there's been a few arrests under DEEP for people making Facebook posts and things like that, but not that many. "But the legal framework has been there since you know, Trump round one, basically. But anyway, this pitch to that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to you know, bring about some sort of pre-crime society. He was being pitched at the time and he was interested in it, but it didn't ultimately happen, in creating this agency called HARPA, which was supposed to be like the health version of the Pentagon's DARPA and the, the program that they wanted to start with, the acronym was Safe Homes and it was basically about analyzing American social media posts for early warning signs of neuropsychiatric violence. And then based on that, would, would either you know, send people to a court ordered psychologist or physician or even you know, house arrest, without them having committed any crime. "So now that we have Big Tech even more intertwined with Trump Round two, you know, people should really be paying attention to the stuff, especially now that Palantir, especially through the Doge, formerly led by Elon Musk Agency Has sort of embedded Palantir in even more aspects of the government than it was in before, including like the IRS and you know, mortgage stuff like Fannie Mae and all of that. You know, all have Palantir now. And then basically giving them the keys to the kingdom with a lot of you know, data that the Department of Treasury has about your finances in the irs and all of that, you know, all of this is going to go into this master database. "And the goal of Palantir, just like it was with total information awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre crime. And Palantir did that, you know, for a few years, several years, in police departments around the country piloting predictive policing programs which is pre- crime, in mainly low income minority neighborhoods, starting off in New Orleans. And now you have other companies besides Palantir that do this. There's one in LA called PredPol, and they have an accuracy of half a percent and they haven't gotten rid of the contract. "So it's not really about better, more efficient policing. I mean that's what it's going to be sold as. It's basically the idea that was developed, you know, by the, the British for prison designs in the 1800s, the Panopticon. The idea that if people feel like they're constantly under watch and something and they could, you know, be you know, well, obviously out of the prison context, you could be put in prison for doing the wrong thing or whatever. You know, then people will police themselves if they're under constant, if they know they're under constant watch, they will police themselves, they will censor themselves, things of that nature. And I think ultimately that's the form of control it is about."
Sense Receptor
12,941 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten