正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 “New York counted votes it can’t prove came from real, qualified voters.” Marly Hornik, president of RealAmerica.Vote, joined our reporter, @CaraCastruova, at the MAHA Institute Roundtable with a major update on her federal lawsuit against Letitia James and the New York State Board of Elections. Hornik explains how...

21,258 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 “Ignore Them.” Constitutional Lawsuit Against Letitia James Moves Forward Amid Federal Case Chaos RealAmerica.Vote CEO Marly Hornik is leading what she calls a first-of-its-kind constitutional civil rights lawsuit against Letitia James and the New York State Board of Elections. The allegation? That state officials failed to properly qualify voters according to New York law and retaliated against citizens who exposed it. Hornik says independent audits of official state election records revealed serious qualification failures. When those findings were made public, she claims the response wasn’t transparency - it was suppression. In court filings, attorneys representing the state reportedly ended a motion with two words: “Ignore them.” Hornik argues this lawsuit is fundamentally different from past election cases. It is not just about procedures - it is rooted in the Constitution’s guarantee of representative government and the First Amendment rights of citizens to speak, audit, and petition their government without retaliation. “This is a case of first impression,” she says. “No one has ever filed a civil rights action against a state for failing to qualify voters according to law.” While headlines focus on prosecutorial technicalities, this constitutional challenge could have long-term implications for how states conduct and oversee federal elections. The question now: Will courts take seriously claims that voter qualification standards were ignored and that citizens who exposed it were punished? Or will powerful state actors once again avoid accountability?

LindellTV

14,266 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! An election fraudster exposed by James O'Keefe in Gavin Newsom's California just pleaded GUILTY to her crimes, AAG Harmeet Dhillon announces In Skid Row, she was gathering homeless signatures fraudulently for ballot petitions, with FAKE ADDRESSES, in exchange for cash and other items of value These same people could also be mailed ballots. Brenda Brown may now face YEARS in PRISON. LET'S GO, James O'Keefe 🔥 DHILLON: "It shows how easy it is under California law to corrupt the state's voter rolls, and thereby corrupt the state and federal elections administered by the state, because when someone registers to vote, including with a fake address in the case of an unknown number of people here, they're mailed ballots that include state and federal elections here in Los Angeles." "She would sometimes find that the signatures would be disqualified because the people signing these signature petitions weren't actually registered to vote." "So to remedy this flaw in her business arrangements, she would then gather starting in 2025 stacks of voter registration forms from the Los Angeles County Registrar voters, and then go to Skid Row in downtown Los Angeles to have homeless people first sign the voter registration forms and then sign the signature petitions." "And she did this in exchange for cash and other items of value, inducements both for the voter registration and for the signature petitions. These were often small sums of cash, just a few dollars, as well as cigarettes and phone cards." "On several occasions, when the homeless person had no formal address to enter on the voter registration form, [Brown] provided them with a fake address, namely her own former address in Los Angeles to write on the voter registration form."

Eric Daugherty

227,984 次观看 • 3 个月前

Here is my (long) explanation of why the DOJ botched the Mangione prosecution: If you don’t want to read all this, just watch my interview with CNN. Normally, parallel and state prosecutions for the same crime don't violate double jeopardy, because they're dual sovereigns. We saw this with Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd and the police officers who beat Rodney King, for instance. But New York is unique. New York has a specific state law that prohibits dual prosecutions for the “same criminal act or occurrence.” The defense immediately filed a motion arguing that the stalking and murder were all part of the same criminal act and by pleading guilty in federal court, that prevents Mangione from being prosecuted in state court. The stalking charges in federal court carry a potential life sentence. But Mangione's guideline range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines is closer to 25 to 30 years. If the federal judge sentences Mangione to something in that range and he avoids state murder charges because of New York’s double jeopardy law, that would be a great result for the defense. Instead of being on death row, Mangione does easier federal time and is out in his 50s. If the state charges get dismissed, this will go down as one of the biggest unforced errors in SDNY (and maybe even DOJ) history. The feds filed to execute Mangione (maybe in violation of their own DOJ Petite policy), but the death penalty was struck, and the federal murder and firearms charges were dismissed, and all that remained were two stalking charges. The DOJ should have either appealed to the 2nd Circuit to buy more time or should have dismissed their case without prejudice and allowed the Manhattan DA to proceed first. The bottom line is there is no double jeopardy defense if the state goes first and the Feds second. AG Todd Blanche is very aware of this double jeopardy issue because he used this same law to successfully defended former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and have his New York state charges dismissed after Manafort was convicted in a previous federal case. He should have known better and told SDNY to stand down.

Neama Rahmani

103,774 次观看 • 14 天前