Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Newly released video logs from Jeffrey Epstein’s final night at the Metropolitan Correctional Center have reignited scrutiny over official accounts, revealing a critical discrepancy regarding who may have accessed his tier. While the Department of Justice’s Inspector General previously concluded that no unauthorized individuals entered the housing unit, recently...

Microinteracti1's profile picture

Gandalv

58,873 subscribers

10,699 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇺🇸 Newly released DOJ records show investigators reviewing surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death noticed an orange-colored figure moving up the stairs toward the locked, isolated tier where his cell was located around 10:39 p.m. on Aug. 9, 2019. Video observation logs suggest the shape could have been an inmate escorted to the tier, though investigators reached different conclusions. The FBI described it as “possibly an inmate,” while the DOJ Inspector General later identified it as an unidentified corrections officer, possibly carrying orange bedding or linen. The Inspector General’s final report noted that the individual appeared on the stairway at 10:39 p.m. and returned into camera view at 10:41 p.m. CBS says official accounts never mentioned the orange figure, despite later statements from authorities insisting no one entered Epstein’s housing tier that night.
4:49

🇺🇸 Newly released DOJ records show investigators reviewing surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death noticed an orange-colored figure moving up the stairs toward the locked, isolated tier where his cell was located around 10:39 p.m. on Aug. 9, 2019. Video observation logs suggest the shape could have been an inmate escorted to the tier, though investigators reached different conclusions. The FBI described it as “possibly an inmate,” while the DOJ Inspector General later identified it as an unidentified corrections officer, possibly carrying orange bedding or linen. The Inspector General’s final report noted that the individual appeared on the stairway at 10:39 p.m. and returned into camera view at 10:41 p.m. CBS says official accounts never mentioned the orange figure, despite later statements from authorities insisting no one entered Epstein’s housing tier that night.

DD Geopolitics

607,773 views • 6 months ago

DISTURBING: Epstein’s death statement was drafted a day before he "died"—and now, key documents naming his powerful friends are being deleted. A DOJ memo titled “Statement on the Death of Jeffrey Epstein” was created on August 9, 2019—one full day before he was found “dead” in his Manhattan jail cell. At the same time, newly released surveillance logs reveal something even darker: a glowing orange figure moving up the stairs toward Epstein’s isolated tier at 10:39 p.m. that night. Officials claimed it was a guard with laundry. But video experts say it looked more like a prisoner in an orange jumpsuit. Even the FBI and DOJ’s own Inspector General couldn’t agree on what the footage shows. No official time of death was ever confirmed. Then came the quiet deletion: an 86-page document naming Epstein co-conspirators—including Ghislaine Maxwell, Leon Black, and Prince Andrew—vanished from the DOJ website, in direct violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Why write the statement a day early? Why scrub the names now? Something sinister is being buried. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report before they bury this, too. 👇
9:09

DISTURBING: Epstein’s death statement was drafted a day before he "died"—and now, key documents naming his powerful friends are being deleted. A DOJ memo titled “Statement on the Death of Jeffrey Epstein” was created on August 9, 2019—one full day before he was found “dead” in his Manhattan jail cell. At the same time, newly released surveillance logs reveal something even darker: a glowing orange figure moving up the stairs toward Epstein’s isolated tier at 10:39 p.m. that night. Officials claimed it was a guard with laundry. But video experts say it looked more like a prisoner in an orange jumpsuit. Even the FBI and DOJ’s own Inspector General couldn’t agree on what the footage shows. No official time of death was ever confirmed. Then came the quiet deletion: an 86-page document naming Epstein co-conspirators—including Ghislaine Maxwell, Leon Black, and Prince Andrew—vanished from the DOJ website, in direct violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Why write the statement a day early? Why scrub the names now? Something sinister is being buried. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report before they bury this, too. 👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

69,621 views • 6 months ago

The night before Epstein was found dead, security footage caught a flash of prison jumpsuit-orange moving up the stairs toward his prison tier. The recent 3 million Epstein files have revealed to the public for the first time that the FBI thinks the flash could have been an inmate. This entry is from FBI analysis of the security footage: 10:39pm: "A flash or orange looks to be going up the L Tier stairs — could possibly be an inmate escorted up to that Tier." Why is this flash of prison jump suit-orange heading in the direction of Epstein's prison tier the night before he was found dead not getting more attention? Why didn't the FBI do everything in its power to determine what this orange flash was? Why isn't this a top DOJ priority now? Nothing about that night in August 2019 is conclusive. Nearly seven years later, we still need answers.
5:20

The night before Epstein was found dead, security footage caught a flash of prison jumpsuit-orange moving up the stairs toward his prison tier. The recent 3 million Epstein files have revealed to the public for the first time that the FBI thinks the flash could have been an inmate. This entry is from FBI analysis of the security footage: 10:39pm: "A flash or orange looks to be going up the L Tier stairs — could possibly be an inmate escorted up to that Tier." Why is this flash of prison jump suit-orange heading in the direction of Epstein's prison tier the night before he was found dead not getting more attention? Why didn't the FBI do everything in its power to determine what this orange flash was? Why isn't this a top DOJ priority now? Nothing about that night in August 2019 is conclusive. Nearly seven years later, we still need answers.

Liz Wheeler

126,991 views • 6 months ago

🚨 This is the footage the FBI says “clear as day” shows Epstein being Escorted to his Tier with No One Else Entering 🔻7:49 PM: The first and only footage of Epstein can be seen, according to the FBI. • he was escorted from his cell to another wing in the unit. • there is no evidence he actually went up the stairs to the tier. • the FBI stated anyone entering Epstein’s tier would have been captured by this footage. —— this is directly contradicted by the footage the FBI released. The MAIN ENTRANCE to the area, as well as the direct path to Epstein’s tier, cannot be seen by the only working camera. Look at all those downed cameras. 🔻 8:21PM: Another inmate can be seen being moved to Epstein’s tier —— again, there is no physical evidence detected on the stairs again. 🔻 Tova Noel and Michael Thomas were the only identified correctional officers on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died. • the rules required rounds to be made every 30 minutes on Epstein, “As Per God”… but the only time Tova did those rounds was at 10:30pm… Clip Full Comprehensive Report
1:54

🚨 This is the footage the FBI says “clear as day” shows Epstein being Escorted to his Tier with No One Else Entering 🔻7:49 PM: The first and only footage of Epstein can be seen, according to the FBI. • he was escorted from his cell to another wing in the unit. • there is no evidence he actually went up the stairs to the tier. • the FBI stated anyone entering Epstein’s tier would have been captured by this footage. —— this is directly contradicted by the footage the FBI released. The MAIN ENTRANCE to the area, as well as the direct path to Epstein’s tier, cannot be seen by the only working camera. Look at all those downed cameras. 🔻 8:21PM: Another inmate can be seen being moved to Epstein’s tier —— again, there is no physical evidence detected on the stairs again. 🔻 Tova Noel and Michael Thomas were the only identified correctional officers on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died. • the rules required rounds to be made every 30 minutes on Epstein, “As Per God”… but the only time Tova did those rounds was at 10:30pm… Clip Full Comprehensive Report

MJTruthUltra

414,623 views • 1 year ago

Jeffrey Epstein's final phone call was to his mother, but the problem is, she passed away 15 year prior. The Epstein files exposed an alleged plot of Epstein being transported out of prison before his "death," an FBI agent taking the security tapes, and allegedly using a fake or replacement body? The story gets even weirder, so who did he really call, and was this the greenlight to execute his escape and fake death? According to the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report, Jeffrey Epstein was permitted to make a single unmonitored phone call from the Metropolitan Correctional Center on the evening of August 9, 2019, just hours before his death. When asked whom he was calling, Epstein stated it was his mother; she had died in 2004, fifteen years earlier. The OIG later identified the recipient as Karyna Shuliak, Epstein’s girlfriend, a Belarusian national then living in New York and listed on several of his properties. Shuliak was added to a revised will Epstein signed two days before his death, along with several other unnamed individuals whose identities were never publicly disclosed. She has since largely disappeared from public view and is reported to have left the United States, possibly for England or another country. In the same final hours, Epstein texted author Michael Wolff in reply to a casual check-in: "Still hanging around." The decision to allow an unmonitored call, contrary to MCC protocols, has never been fully explained. The discrepancy between Epstein’s stated recipient and the actual one, combined with the timing and the ambiguous wording of his last known message, continues to raise questions about prison oversight and the circumstances surrounding his death and now the new Epstein documents just opened a whole new angle on what really happened to Jeffery Epstein.
6:16

Jeffrey Epstein's final phone call was to his mother, but the problem is, she passed away 15 year prior. The Epstein files exposed an alleged plot of Epstein being transported out of prison before his "death," an FBI agent taking the security tapes, and allegedly using a fake or replacement body? The story gets even weirder, so who did he really call, and was this the greenlight to execute his escape and fake death? According to the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report, Jeffrey Epstein was permitted to make a single unmonitored phone call from the Metropolitan Correctional Center on the evening of August 9, 2019, just hours before his death. When asked whom he was calling, Epstein stated it was his mother; she had died in 2004, fifteen years earlier. The OIG later identified the recipient as Karyna Shuliak, Epstein’s girlfriend, a Belarusian national then living in New York and listed on several of his properties. Shuliak was added to a revised will Epstein signed two days before his death, along with several other unnamed individuals whose identities were never publicly disclosed. She has since largely disappeared from public view and is reported to have left the United States, possibly for England or another country. In the same final hours, Epstein texted author Michael Wolff in reply to a casual check-in: "Still hanging around." The decision to allow an unmonitored call, contrary to MCC protocols, has never been fully explained. The discrepancy between Epstein’s stated recipient and the actual one, combined with the timing and the ambiguous wording of his last known message, continues to raise questions about prison oversight and the circumstances surrounding his death and now the new Epstein documents just opened a whole new angle on what really happened to Jeffery Epstein.

The SCIF

61,031 views • 6 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: CONGRESS RELEASES NEW EPSTEIN JAIL FOOTAGE ADDRESSING INFAMOUS ONE-MINUTE GAP Congress released new surveillance from Epstein’s jail unit, filling the infamous one-minute gap on the night of his 2019 death. The footage, part of a 34,000-file House Oversight drop, shows the system reset at midnight, forcing two clips to be stitched together. Earlier DOJ footage was flagged by forensic experts as spliced in Adobe Premiere, fueling cover-up claims. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s claim that “every night loses a minute” now faces new scrutiny. Source: Fox
2:46

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: CONGRESS RELEASES NEW EPSTEIN JAIL FOOTAGE ADDRESSING INFAMOUS ONE-MINUTE GAP Congress released new surveillance from Epstein’s jail unit, filling the infamous one-minute gap on the night of his 2019 death. The footage, part of a 34,000-file House Oversight drop, shows the system reset at midnight, forcing two clips to be stitched together. Earlier DOJ footage was flagged by forensic experts as spliced in Adobe Premiere, fueling cover-up claims. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s claim that “every night loses a minute” now faces new scrutiny. Source: Fox

Mario Nawfal

107,407 views • 11 months ago

If I could question Pam Bondi in Congress, this is what I’d ask her: Last February, when you handed conservative commentators (including me) who were visiting the White House for meetings with cabinet members the infamous white Epstein binders, did any Trump admin members besides your team know you were going to distribute those binders? If so, who? You made the Epstein binder cover sheet on that binder, correct? The one that bragged about the Trump administration being the most transparent administration in history? Yes or no? When you handed out those binders to those conservatives, had you even viewed the contents of those binders? Had you looked at those pages? Had you read the documents? Had you reviewed any of the supposed SDNY materials that the supposed whistleblower told you that the SDNY was hiding from you? Truckloads and truckloads, you told the conservative commentators, including me, at the White House, the juicy stuff, the dirty stuff. Had you looked at any of it yourself? Had any member of your team looked at it? Had you looked at the client list that you claimed, while on Fox News, was sitting on your desk? Who told you that the FBI was going through thousands of videos of child sexual abuse material? This was in late spring and early summer 2025. Why in July of 2025 did you say there were no more files coming? Period. Did anyone up to it, including President Trump, direct you on how to speak about the Epstein files, or whether or not to be transparent about the contents, or whether or not to release them? Do you agree with FBI Director Kash Patel and now former Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, the statements that they made to Maria Bartiromo on Fox News last summer when they stated unequivocally that Epstein killed himself? Do you agree with that assessment? Have you viewed the video the flash of orange that appeared to enter Jeffrey Epstein's prison tier at the Metropolitan Correctional Center at 10:39 p.m. on the night before Epstein was found dead? This prison activity log was just released to the public, yet DOJ has been in possession of it for years. The FBI’s own report says that flash of orange was possibly an inmate. Was any further investigation done about the identity of this person? Was there any investigation into an agent of the FBI changing the camera at the Metropolitan Correctional Center following Epstein's death in a way that erased the recorded footage? Has your team at the DOJ done any further investigation into Jeffrey Epstein or into the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death, or have you relied on data, information, and investigative findings that had already been conducted by your predecessors? This is one of the most critical questions of all. And of course, when will the remaining 3 million documents be released? This 3 million that was released last week is only half of what we expect to see. Will there be any further investigations or prosecutions? These are the questions that should have been asked of Attorney General Pam Bondi. These are the questions that we need answers to.
4:24

If I could question Pam Bondi in Congress, this is what I’d ask her: Last February, when you handed conservative commentators (including me) who were visiting the White House for meetings with cabinet members the infamous white Epstein binders, did any Trump admin members besides your team know you were going to distribute those binders? If so, who? You made the Epstein binder cover sheet on that binder, correct? The one that bragged about the Trump administration being the most transparent administration in history? Yes or no? When you handed out those binders to those conservatives, had you even viewed the contents of those binders? Had you looked at those pages? Had you read the documents? Had you reviewed any of the supposed SDNY materials that the supposed whistleblower told you that the SDNY was hiding from you? Truckloads and truckloads, you told the conservative commentators, including me, at the White House, the juicy stuff, the dirty stuff. Had you looked at any of it yourself? Had any member of your team looked at it? Had you looked at the client list that you claimed, while on Fox News, was sitting on your desk? Who told you that the FBI was going through thousands of videos of child sexual abuse material? This was in late spring and early summer 2025. Why in July of 2025 did you say there were no more files coming? Period. Did anyone up to it, including President Trump, direct you on how to speak about the Epstein files, or whether or not to be transparent about the contents, or whether or not to release them? Do you agree with FBI Director Kash Patel and now former Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, the statements that they made to Maria Bartiromo on Fox News last summer when they stated unequivocally that Epstein killed himself? Do you agree with that assessment? Have you viewed the video the flash of orange that appeared to enter Jeffrey Epstein's prison tier at the Metropolitan Correctional Center at 10:39 p.m. on the night before Epstein was found dead? This prison activity log was just released to the public, yet DOJ has been in possession of it for years. The FBI’s own report says that flash of orange was possibly an inmate. Was any further investigation done about the identity of this person? Was there any investigation into an agent of the FBI changing the camera at the Metropolitan Correctional Center following Epstein's death in a way that erased the recorded footage? Has your team at the DOJ done any further investigation into Jeffrey Epstein or into the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death, or have you relied on data, information, and investigative findings that had already been conducted by your predecessors? This is one of the most critical questions of all. And of course, when will the remaining 3 million documents be released? This 3 million that was released last week is only half of what we expect to see. Will there be any further investigations or prosecutions? These are the questions that should have been asked of Attorney General Pam Bondi. These are the questions that we need answers to.

Liz Wheeler

84,849 views • 6 months ago

In August 2019, only hours after Epstein was found dead in his "high security" prison cell, then Attorney General William Barr announced he'd killed himself? No investigation, but the premature statement was made. Interestingly, Bill Barr's father, Donald Barr, just so happened to be the headmaster of the exclusive Dalton School, who inexplicably, hired Epstein to teach there in the 1970s, despite his complete lack of a college degree? And it gets better, before becoming Attorney General, Barr worked for Kirkland & Ellis, the very law firm that represented Epstein during his 2008 Florida plea deal. "I am shocked by the apparent suicide of Jeffrey Epstein, which occurred at a time when he should have been under stricter supervision. We will get to the bottom of what happened. The investigation into his accomplices will continue." Dont forget, Bill Barr is also a former CIA "employee" and a protege of the Bush family, whose members also feature in the Epstein files
0:53

In August 2019, only hours after Epstein was found dead in his "high security" prison cell, then Attorney General William Barr announced he'd killed himself? No investigation, but the premature statement was made. Interestingly, Bill Barr's father, Donald Barr, just so happened to be the headmaster of the exclusive Dalton School, who inexplicably, hired Epstein to teach there in the 1970s, despite his complete lack of a college degree? And it gets better, before becoming Attorney General, Barr worked for Kirkland & Ellis, the very law firm that represented Epstein during his 2008 Florida plea deal. "I am shocked by the apparent suicide of Jeffrey Epstein, which occurred at a time when he should have been under stricter supervision. We will get to the bottom of what happened. The investigation into his accomplices will continue." Dont forget, Bill Barr is also a former CIA "employee" and a protege of the Bush family, whose members also feature in the Epstein files

Chay Bowes

527,802 views • 6 months ago

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee walked out of a closed-door briefing with Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche less than an hour into the briefing on Wednesday. Democratic lawmakers on the panel said they believed Bondi scheduled the briefing to try to avoid the committee's earlier subpoena for a sworn-in deposition about the Jeffrey Epstein files. After the briefing, Bondi was asked by reporters whether she would comply with the subpoena. “I made it crystal clear I will follow the law,” she said. The walkout occurred as lawmakers expressed frustration at the Justice Department's handling of the files that have been released as part of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Justice correspondent Ali Rogin reports.
3:13

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee walked out of a closed-door briefing with Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche less than an hour into the briefing on Wednesday. Democratic lawmakers on the panel said they believed Bondi scheduled the briefing to try to avoid the committee's earlier subpoena for a sworn-in deposition about the Jeffrey Epstein files. After the briefing, Bondi was asked by reporters whether she would comply with the subpoena. “I made it crystal clear I will follow the law,” she said. The walkout occurred as lawmakers expressed frustration at the Justice Department's handling of the files that have been released as part of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Justice correspondent Ali Rogin reports.

PBS News

13,721 views • 5 months ago

This afternoon, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to questions about the Epstein client list in light of these new DOJ and FBI statements. A reporter asked, “Karoline, the DOJ and FBI have now concluded there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list. What do you tell MAGA supporters who say they want anyone involved in Epstein’s alleged crimes held accountable?” Leavitt replied, “This administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime to be accountable, and I would argue this administration has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous administration.” She continued, “The Trump administration is committed to truth and transparency. That’s why the Attorney General and the FBI Director pledged, at the president’s direction, to do an exhaustive review of all the files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and his death. They put out a memo in conclusion of that review.” “There was material they did not release because frankly it was incredibly graphic and contained child pornography, which is not something that is appropriate for public consumption,” she added. “But they committed to an exhaustive investigation. That’s what they did and they provided the results of that.” “That’s transparency,” Leavitt said.
0:56

This afternoon, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to questions about the Epstein client list in light of these new DOJ and FBI statements. A reporter asked, “Karoline, the DOJ and FBI have now concluded there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list. What do you tell MAGA supporters who say they want anyone involved in Epstein’s alleged crimes held accountable?” Leavitt replied, “This administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime to be accountable, and I would argue this administration has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous administration.” She continued, “The Trump administration is committed to truth and transparency. That’s why the Attorney General and the FBI Director pledged, at the president’s direction, to do an exhaustive review of all the files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and his death. They put out a memo in conclusion of that review.” “There was material they did not release because frankly it was incredibly graphic and contained child pornography, which is not something that is appropriate for public consumption,” she added. “But they committed to an exhaustive investigation. That’s what they did and they provided the results of that.” “That’s transparency,” Leavitt said.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

972,246 views • 1 year ago

While President Donald Trump has tried to distance himself from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, his name and image have appeared repeatedly in records released this year from Epstein’s estate. New photos and documents in recent weeks have offered some glimpses of their relationship, which has come under renewed scrutiny in the push for the government to release the information it has about the Epstein investigation. Trump and Epstein were at one point friends. Trump traveled on the disgraced financier’s jet at least eight times in the 1990s, at one point calling Epstein a “terrific guy.” But, the two had a falling out in the early 2000s. Trump has never been accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein’s yearslong sex trafficking scheme. As a candidate, Trump called for the release of the Epstein files. As president, he characterized the push for transparency as a “Democrat hoax.” In late November, he signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bill from Congress that requires the Department of Justice to make public all materials related to its investigation. Here’s a closer look at everything we know about Epstein and Trump’s friendship.
3:35

While President Donald Trump has tried to distance himself from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, his name and image have appeared repeatedly in records released this year from Epstein’s estate. New photos and documents in recent weeks have offered some glimpses of their relationship, which has come under renewed scrutiny in the push for the government to release the information it has about the Epstein investigation. Trump and Epstein were at one point friends. Trump traveled on the disgraced financier’s jet at least eight times in the 1990s, at one point calling Epstein a “terrific guy.” But, the two had a falling out in the early 2000s. Trump has never been accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein’s yearslong sex trafficking scheme. As a candidate, Trump called for the release of the Epstein files. As president, he characterized the push for transparency as a “Democrat hoax.” In late November, he signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bill from Congress that requires the Department of Justice to make public all materials related to its investigation. Here’s a closer look at everything we know about Epstein and Trump’s friendship.

PBS News

23,721 views • 8 months ago

NEW: Justice Department releases 10-hour video of the night Jeffrey Epstein died saying it proves he took his own life, say there is "no evidence" he kept a "client list." "The FBI's independent review of this footage confirmed that from the time Epstein was locked in his cell at around 10:40 pm on August 9, 2019, until around 6:30 am the next morning, nobody entered any of the tiers in the SHU," the FBI and DOJ said in a memo. "This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.' There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions." "We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." What a complete disaster.
2:53

NEW: Justice Department releases 10-hour video of the night Jeffrey Epstein died saying it proves he took his own life, say there is "no evidence" he kept a "client list." "The FBI's independent review of this footage confirmed that from the time Epstein was locked in his cell at around 10:40 pm on August 9, 2019, until around 6:30 am the next morning, nobody entered any of the tiers in the SHU," the FBI and DOJ said in a memo. "This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.' There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions." "We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." What a complete disaster.

Collin Rugg

772,328 views • 1 year ago

REPORT: New DOJ documents reveal a stunning detail in the Epstein case: one of the prison guards assigned to monitor him searched his name online just minutes before his body was discovered. The discovery is raising serious questions about what really happened inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center the night the world’s most notorious sex trafficker died. According to newly surfaced records, correctional officer Tova Noel searched “latest on Epstein in jail” twice, at 5:42 a.m. and again at 5:52 a.m., less than 40 minutes before Epstein was found hanging in his cell at 6:30 a.m. Noel and another guard had been accused of falsifying records claiming they conducted required inmate checks every 30 minutes that night. Both admitted the logs were inaccurate, yet the criminal charges were later dropped. Investigators also flagged a series of cash deposits in Noel’s bank account, including a $5,000 deposit just ten days before Epstein died. Between suspicious bank activity, missed checks, and conflicting testimony, the questions surrounding Epstein’s death are only growing. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report and ask yourself whether this was negligence, or something far more troubling. 👇
6:48

REPORT: New DOJ documents reveal a stunning detail in the Epstein case: one of the prison guards assigned to monitor him searched his name online just minutes before his body was discovered. The discovery is raising serious questions about what really happened inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center the night the world’s most notorious sex trafficker died. According to newly surfaced records, correctional officer Tova Noel searched “latest on Epstein in jail” twice, at 5:42 a.m. and again at 5:52 a.m., less than 40 minutes before Epstein was found hanging in his cell at 6:30 a.m. Noel and another guard had been accused of falsifying records claiming they conducted required inmate checks every 30 minutes that night. Both admitted the logs were inaccurate, yet the criminal charges were later dropped. Investigators also flagged a series of cash deposits in Noel’s bank account, including a $5,000 deposit just ten days before Epstein died. Between suspicious bank activity, missed checks, and conflicting testimony, the questions surrounding Epstein’s death are only growing. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report and ask yourself whether this was negligence, or something far more troubling. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

76,008 views • 5 months ago

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., asked Attorney General Pam Bondi in an oversight hearing Wednesday to apologize to the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse. In a heated exchange, Jayapal asked Bondi to turn to the survivors in attendance “and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information.” Minutes of crosstalk and argument between Jayapal, Bondi, committee chair Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., followed. In her final seconds, Jayapal reiterated she believes the release of the Epstein files has been “a massive cover-up.” The Department of Justice has released millions of pages of Epstein-related documents, photographs and messages. But it missed its deadline by more than a month, and the releases have been mired by missed redactions and accusations of key omissions. Millions of pages related to the investigation into the late convicted sex offender remain inaccessible, though the White House defends its review as thorough and complete. A bipartisan group of lawmakers has demanded more transparency, accusing the government of failing to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed in November, and survivors released a Super Bowl ad telling Bondi that “it’s time for the truth.”
3:30

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., asked Attorney General Pam Bondi in an oversight hearing Wednesday to apologize to the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse. In a heated exchange, Jayapal asked Bondi to turn to the survivors in attendance “and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information.” Minutes of crosstalk and argument between Jayapal, Bondi, committee chair Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., followed. In her final seconds, Jayapal reiterated she believes the release of the Epstein files has been “a massive cover-up.” The Department of Justice has released millions of pages of Epstein-related documents, photographs and messages. But it missed its deadline by more than a month, and the releases have been mired by missed redactions and accusations of key omissions. Millions of pages related to the investigation into the late convicted sex offender remain inaccessible, though the White House defends its review as thorough and complete. A bipartisan group of lawmakers has demanded more transparency, accusing the government of failing to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed in November, and survivors released a Super Bowl ad telling Bondi that “it’s time for the truth.”

PBS News

17,323 views • 6 months ago

It turns out Christopher Wray and William fucking Barr oversaw the overthrow of your government on November 3, 2020—and covered it up: This is: Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Anthony “Tony” Shaffer U.S. Army / Army Reserve and Ohio Army National Guard Military intelligence officer and former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) officer Lieutenant Colonel: “I believe there was hacking. I believe Dominion is dishonest. I believe that mass ballot fraud occurred. Look, I investigated this. I found one guy who moved a vehicle of 162,000 curated ballots from Bethpage, New York, to central Pennsylvania. By the way, a guy named Bill Barr called me and said, ‘You need to give the investigation up. You turn it over to the FBI.’ Once the FBI got it, we never heard anything again. Just saying.” “When was the last time you ever had Bill Barr, the attorney general, calling a private citizen, saying, ‘Oh, you need to stop’? Think about that for a second.” “I talked to Ken Cuccinelli, the former attorney general of Virginia, about that. I said, “Ken, just two weeks ago, have you ever heard of the former attorney general of the United States calling a private citizen and saying, ‘You need to give this up’? Think about that! The attorney general—not a staff member, not an FBI agent, the attorney general himself.” It turns out Lieutenant Colonel isn’t the only one William fucking Barr told to stop investigating election fraud. There was a letter dated June 9, 2021, sent by William McSwain, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from 2018 until January 2021, in which McSwain said that William fucking Barr told him to “steer clear of election fraud claim investigations to the extent it was possible.” Tony Shaffer 🇺🇲☢️ FBI Director Kash Patel Attorney General Todd Blanche
0:58

It turns out Christopher Wray and William fucking Barr oversaw the overthrow of your government on November 3, 2020—and covered it up: This is: Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Anthony “Tony” Shaffer U.S. Army / Army Reserve and Ohio Army National Guard Military intelligence officer and former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) officer Lieutenant Colonel: “I believe there was hacking. I believe Dominion is dishonest. I believe that mass ballot fraud occurred. Look, I investigated this. I found one guy who moved a vehicle of 162,000 curated ballots from Bethpage, New York, to central Pennsylvania. By the way, a guy named Bill Barr called me and said, ‘You need to give the investigation up. You turn it over to the FBI.’ Once the FBI got it, we never heard anything again. Just saying.” “When was the last time you ever had Bill Barr, the attorney general, calling a private citizen, saying, ‘Oh, you need to stop’? Think about that for a second.” “I talked to Ken Cuccinelli, the former attorney general of Virginia, about that. I said, “Ken, just two weeks ago, have you ever heard of the former attorney general of the United States calling a private citizen and saying, ‘You need to give this up’? Think about that! The attorney general—not a staff member, not an FBI agent, the attorney general himself.” It turns out Lieutenant Colonel isn’t the only one William fucking Barr told to stop investigating election fraud. There was a letter dated June 9, 2021, sent by William McSwain, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from 2018 until January 2021, in which McSwain said that William fucking Barr told him to “steer clear of election fraud claim investigations to the extent it was possible.” Tony Shaffer 🇺🇲☢️ FBI Director Kash Patel Attorney General Todd Blanche

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

43,937 views • 6 days ago

JUST IN: Karoline Leavitt responds to Epstein client list questions after new DOJ and FBI statements. Hmmm. A reporter asked: “Karoline, the DOJ and FBI have now concluded there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list. What do you tell MAGA supporters who say they want anyone involved in Epstein’s alleged crimes held accountable?” Leavitt replied: “This administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime to be accountable, and I would argue this administration has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous administration.” “The Trump administration is committed to truth and transparency. That’s why the Attorney General and the FBI Director pledged, at the president’s direction, to do an exhaustive review of all the files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and his death. They put out a memo in conclusion of that review.” “There was material they did not release because frankly it was incredibly graphic and contained child pornography, which is not something that is appropriate for public consumption.” “But they committed to an exhaustive investigation. That’s what they did and they provided the results of that.” “That’s transparency.”
0:56

JUST IN: Karoline Leavitt responds to Epstein client list questions after new DOJ and FBI statements. Hmmm. A reporter asked: “Karoline, the DOJ and FBI have now concluded there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list. What do you tell MAGA supporters who say they want anyone involved in Epstein’s alleged crimes held accountable?” Leavitt replied: “This administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime to be accountable, and I would argue this administration has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly the previous administration.” “The Trump administration is committed to truth and transparency. That’s why the Attorney General and the FBI Director pledged, at the president’s direction, to do an exhaustive review of all the files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and his death. They put out a memo in conclusion of that review.” “There was material they did not release because frankly it was incredibly graphic and contained child pornography, which is not something that is appropriate for public consumption.” “But they committed to an exhaustive investigation. That’s what they did and they provided the results of that.” “That’s transparency.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

148,511 views • 1 year ago

Today I questioned the Solicitor General about the Attorney General’s role in the collapse of the China spy prosecution. Throughout this saga there have been conflicting accounts about who did what, and why decisions were taken. The rules are clear, the Attorney General must be consulted on politically sensitive matters. That doesn’t compromise their independence, it ensures they are informed at the time. We understand from the Director of Public Prosecutions that the Attorney General must have been told there was insufficient evidence to prosecute. If that’s the case, the Attorney General’s duty was to warn the Government that unless they provided more evidence, the case would collapse. So my question: Did the Attorney General say to the Government, “You are not providing enough evidence to secure a prosecution. It is over to you to do as you have been asked by the DPP”? We deserve to know whether that warning was given, and if it was given, why it was ignored.
1:16

Today I questioned the Solicitor General about the Attorney General’s role in the collapse of the China spy prosecution. Throughout this saga there have been conflicting accounts about who did what, and why decisions were taken. The rules are clear, the Attorney General must be consulted on politically sensitive matters. That doesn’t compromise their independence, it ensures they are informed at the time. We understand from the Director of Public Prosecutions that the Attorney General must have been told there was insufficient evidence to prosecute. If that’s the case, the Attorney General’s duty was to warn the Government that unless they provided more evidence, the case would collapse. So my question: Did the Attorney General say to the Government, “You are not providing enough evidence to secure a prosecution. It is over to you to do as you have been asked by the DPP”? We deserve to know whether that warning was given, and if it was given, why it was ignored.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

26,897 views • 9 months ago

🚨 THREAD 🚨 ‼️ SENATE JUDICIARY DEMOCRATS PLANNING TO GASLIGHT THE NATION OVER JEFFREY EPSTEIN, WEAPONIZED GOVERNMENT, AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE DURING DOJ HEARING WITH Attorney General Pamela Bondi ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7TH, 2025 ‼️ Tomorrow, as US Attorney General Pam Bondi Pam Bondi testifies in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee during an Oversight Hearing at 9 am EST, Senate Judiciary Democrats will put on their crocodile tears and scream about the handling of “political weaponization” and “The Epstein Files” at the DOJ under the 2nd Trump administration. However, the receipts on both issues prove that Senate Democrats are the biggest hypocrites of all time when it comes to these issues. For starters, when Joe Biden was “President” back in 2023, then Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin Senator Dick Durbin blocked Senator Marsha Blackburn’s Sen. Marsha Blackburn’s request for a subpoena of the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs. During a December 14th, 2023, Judiciary Committee meeting, Blackburn stated, "I've been trying to figure out and to subpoena the records for Jeffrey Epstein's plane to find out who was on that plane. I've been so disappointed that Chairman Durbin has continued to block this, because Jeffrey Epstein had probably what is the most high-profile sex trafficking ring we've ever seen, ever heard about. It was high-profile, high-dollar people that were predators on these young girls.” RECEIPTS 👇🏻
1:22

🚨 THREAD 🚨 ‼️ SENATE JUDICIARY DEMOCRATS PLANNING TO GASLIGHT THE NATION OVER JEFFREY EPSTEIN, WEAPONIZED GOVERNMENT, AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE DURING DOJ HEARING WITH Attorney General Pamela Bondi ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7TH, 2025 ‼️ Tomorrow, as US Attorney General Pam Bondi Pam Bondi testifies in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee during an Oversight Hearing at 9 am EST, Senate Judiciary Democrats will put on their crocodile tears and scream about the handling of “political weaponization” and “The Epstein Files” at the DOJ under the 2nd Trump administration. However, the receipts on both issues prove that Senate Democrats are the biggest hypocrites of all time when it comes to these issues. For starters, when Joe Biden was “President” back in 2023, then Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin Senator Dick Durbin blocked Senator Marsha Blackburn’s Sen. Marsha Blackburn’s request for a subpoena of the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs. During a December 14th, 2023, Judiciary Committee meeting, Blackburn stated, "I've been trying to figure out and to subpoena the records for Jeffrey Epstein's plane to find out who was on that plane. I've been so disappointed that Chairman Durbin has continued to block this, because Jeffrey Epstein had probably what is the most high-profile sex trafficking ring we've ever seen, ever heard about. It was high-profile, high-dollar people that were predators on these young girls.” RECEIPTS 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

1,487,112 views • 10 months ago

Inmate Robert Brooks Dies After Brutal Assault by Corrections Officers at Marcy Correctional Facility. Marcy, NY - In a shocking revelation, court documents have detailed the violent death of inmate Robert Brooks at Marcy Correctional Facility, spotlighting systemic abuse within New York's correctional system. The incident, captured on body cameras, was described by New York State Investigator Ryan Paparella as an egregious assault involving multiple corrections officers. Robert Brooks, 43, succumbed to his injuries following what has been characterized as a relentless attack on December 10, 2024. The assault began with Officer Nicholas Anzalone transporting Brooks to the infirmary in a dehumanizing manner—face-down and handcuffed. The journey was far from a mere transfer; body camera footage reveals Anzalone repeatedly striking Brooks, targeting his head, back, and torso. Anzalone's method included gripping Brooks' shirt around the neck, potentially to choke or further control him during the assault. As they neared the infirmary, the violence escalated. Other unnamed officers joined Anzalone, contributing to a group assault that included punches, kicks, and other forms of physical abuse. This collective action suggests not only a lack of intervention but an active participation in the brutality against Brooks. Once inside the infirmary, the assault didn't stop. Officer Robert Kessler, who had assisted in transporting Brooks, was seen shoving him forcefully against a wall, likely causing further injury. Officer Mathew Galliher then pinned Brooks to an examination bed by applying pressure to his chest, an action that could have restricted breathing and added to the torture. The duration of the assault, as shown in the footage, indicates it was not a brief altercation but a sustained act of violence. There was no apparent effort to provide Brooks with medical attention until after the assault had concluded, pointing to an intent to punish or harm. The death of Robert Brooks has led to significant legal and administrative repercussions. Governor Kathy Hochul has ordered the termination of 14 involved corrections officers, with the New York Attorney General’s Office conducting a thorough investigation into the incident. No criminal charges have been filed as of now, but the case has sparked discussions about the use of force within correctional facilities, the culture of violence, and the need for systemic changes. Brooks' family, alongside civil rights advocates, are calling for justice, accountability, and reforms to prevent such tragedies. The incident has not only brought grief to Brooks' loved ones but has also cast a dark shadow over the operations at Marcy Correctional Facility, prompting a reevaluation of correctional practices across the state. This case serves as a grim reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by inmates and the critical need for oversight, transparency, and humane treatment within correctional institutions.
0:41

Inmate Robert Brooks Dies After Brutal Assault by Corrections Officers at Marcy Correctional Facility. Marcy, NY - In a shocking revelation, court documents have detailed the violent death of inmate Robert Brooks at Marcy Correctional Facility, spotlighting systemic abuse within New York's correctional system. The incident, captured on body cameras, was described by New York State Investigator Ryan Paparella as an egregious assault involving multiple corrections officers. Robert Brooks, 43, succumbed to his injuries following what has been characterized as a relentless attack on December 10, 2024. The assault began with Officer Nicholas Anzalone transporting Brooks to the infirmary in a dehumanizing manner—face-down and handcuffed. The journey was far from a mere transfer; body camera footage reveals Anzalone repeatedly striking Brooks, targeting his head, back, and torso. Anzalone's method included gripping Brooks' shirt around the neck, potentially to choke or further control him during the assault. As they neared the infirmary, the violence escalated. Other unnamed officers joined Anzalone, contributing to a group assault that included punches, kicks, and other forms of physical abuse. This collective action suggests not only a lack of intervention but an active participation in the brutality against Brooks. Once inside the infirmary, the assault didn't stop. Officer Robert Kessler, who had assisted in transporting Brooks, was seen shoving him forcefully against a wall, likely causing further injury. Officer Mathew Galliher then pinned Brooks to an examination bed by applying pressure to his chest, an action that could have restricted breathing and added to the torture. The duration of the assault, as shown in the footage, indicates it was not a brief altercation but a sustained act of violence. There was no apparent effort to provide Brooks with medical attention until after the assault had concluded, pointing to an intent to punish or harm. The death of Robert Brooks has led to significant legal and administrative repercussions. Governor Kathy Hochul has ordered the termination of 14 involved corrections officers, with the New York Attorney General’s Office conducting a thorough investigation into the incident. No criminal charges have been filed as of now, but the case has sparked discussions about the use of force within correctional facilities, the culture of violence, and the need for systemic changes. Brooks' family, alongside civil rights advocates, are calling for justice, accountability, and reforms to prevent such tragedies. The incident has not only brought grief to Brooks' loved ones but has also cast a dark shadow over the operations at Marcy Correctional Facility, prompting a reevaluation of correctional practices across the state. This case serves as a grim reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by inmates and the critical need for oversight, transparency, and humane treatment within correctional institutions.

JAS

51,798 views • 1 year ago