正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Next week is going to move fast. I’ve pulled together all the key dates, index inclusions, and expected passive money flows in one clean overview — plus scenarios for how things could evolve later this year as the float increases.

AleXandra Merz 🇺🇲

239,293 subscribers

136,495 次观看 • 13 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治财经体育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Why the S&P 500 Will Be Forced To Buy Bitcoin In this Swan Bitcoin presentation, Adam Livingston explains why passive index mechanics will force the S&P 500 to ingest Bitcoin exposure the moment Strategy qualifies for inclusion. This is not about taste or ideology, it is about rules, float, weights, and the blind math of passive flows. When the index updates the list, trillions in benchmark trackers and benchmark huggers follow, which pipes Bitcoin exposure into every 401k and pension that hugs the S&P. You will learn: - The exact checklist for S&P 500 inclusion and how Strategy now clears it - How passive funds like SPY and VOO are compelled to buy new entrants, not asked - Why a small initial weight can still trigger billions in forced purchases - How spot Bitcoin ETFs amplify the same flows with daily rebalancing - The reflexive loop that forms when Bitcoin rises, Strategy’s weight rises, and passive capital buys again - Real world proofs from prior inclusions that show how fast the index effect hits - Why miners, exchanges, and Bitcoin treasury companies create a second order wave of exposure - Why this is inevitability, not opinion Who this is for: - Finance pros who want the plumbing, not the memes - Bitcoiners who need a clean, shareable explanation for skeptics - CIOs, advisors, and analysts who live and die by benchmark risk Why it matters: - The passive system cannot ignore Bitcoin once the rules are triggered - Index mechanics will distribute Bitcoin exposure across global portfolios by default

Why the S&P 500 Will Be Forced To Buy Bitcoin In this Swan Bitcoin presentation, Adam Livingston explains why passive index mechanics will force the S&P 500 to ingest Bitcoin exposure the moment Strategy qualifies for inclusion. This is not about taste or ideology, it is about rules, float, weights, and the blind math of passive flows. When the index updates the list, trillions in benchmark trackers and benchmark huggers follow, which pipes Bitcoin exposure into every 401k and pension that hugs the S&P. You will learn: - The exact checklist for S&P 500 inclusion and how Strategy now clears it - How passive funds like SPY and VOO are compelled to buy new entrants, not asked - Why a small initial weight can still trigger billions in forced purchases - How spot Bitcoin ETFs amplify the same flows with daily rebalancing - The reflexive loop that forms when Bitcoin rises, Strategy’s weight rises, and passive capital buys again - Real world proofs from prior inclusions that show how fast the index effect hits - Why miners, exchanges, and Bitcoin treasury companies create a second order wave of exposure - Why this is inevitability, not opinion Who this is for: - Finance pros who want the plumbing, not the memes - Bitcoiners who need a clean, shareable explanation for skeptics - CIOs, advisors, and analysts who live and die by benchmark risk Why it matters: - The passive system cannot ignore Bitcoin once the rules are triggered - Index mechanics will distribute Bitcoin exposure across global portfolios by default

Swan

25,982 次观看 • 10 个月前

WATCH: The European Central Bank is expected to cut rates later for the eighth time in just over a year, but it may move more cautiously going forward. The bank is trying to judge how to handle the impact of US tariffs, as Elena Casas explains

WATCH: The European Central Bank is expected to cut rates later for the eighth time in just over a year, but it may move more cautiously going forward. The bank is trying to judge how to handle the impact of US tariffs, as Elena Casas explains

Reuters Business

10,869 次观看 • 1 年前

The European Central Bank is expected to cut rates later for the eighth time in just over a year, but it may move more cautiously going forward. The bank is trying to judge how to handle the impact of US tariffs, as Elena Casas explains

The European Central Bank is expected to cut rates later for the eighth time in just over a year, but it may move more cautiously going forward. The bank is trying to judge how to handle the impact of US tariffs, as Elena Casas explains

Reuters

35,714 次观看 • 1 年前

This little girl pulled up right behind me in the checkout line singing this. We had to run it back one time for the camera. Float is for the Children. #Float #TheAgeOfPleasure

This little girl pulled up right behind me in the checkout line singing this. We had to run it back one time for the camera. Float is for the Children. #Float #TheAgeOfPleasure

NΔNΔ

18,712 次观看 • 3 年前

This is the reason the officer pulled over Tyreek Hill You can see how fast he was going in comparison to the other cars and how fast the cop had to go to catch up

This is the reason the officer pulled over Tyreek Hill You can see how fast he was going in comparison to the other cars and how fast the cop had to go to catch up

Lurch

3,539,216 次观看 • 1 年前

“The way I’ve gone about being a leader is taking bits, pieces and things that I’ve learned from leaders and try to make it my own. As a leader making sure we’re all on the same page, we’re all learning together, accountable for each other. We’re going to go through this together,”Jalen Brunson

“The way I’ve gone about being a leader is taking bits, pieces and things that I’ve learned from leaders and try to make it my own. As a leader making sure we’re all on the same page, we’re all learning together, accountable for each other. We’re going to go through this together,”Jalen Brunson

The Winning Difference

12,482 次观看 • 15 天前

Bryson Howard is possibly the biggest X factor in the ‘27 NBA draft The 6’6 Duke-commit is going to be one of the younger players in CBB next year and has an awesome track record as a scorer and 3-point shooter. Could be one of the top players in this class by next year

Bryson Howard is possibly the biggest X factor in the ‘27 NBA draft The 6’6 Duke-commit is going to be one of the younger players in CBB next year and has an awesome track record as a scorer and 3-point shooter. Could be one of the top players in this class by next year

nbadraftpoint

79,420 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is the most SHAMELESS structural manipulation of a major index I've ever seen. SpaceX is preparing what could be the largest IPO in history. Target valuation: $1.75 trillion. That would make it the sixth-largest company in America on day one. And Nasdaq wants the listing so badly they're literally CHANGING how the Nasdaq-100 works. In February, Nasdaq published a "consultation" proposing sweeping changes to how companies enter the index. The timing is pure coincidence, of course. Just like it's pure coincidence that SpaceX has reportedly made fast index inclusion a CONDITION of listing on Nasdaq. Here's what they're proposing: A new "Fast Entry" rule would let any newly listed company whose market cap ranks in the top 40 of current Nasdaq-100 members get added to the index after just 15 trading days. No seasoning period. No liquidity requirements. Completely exempt from the standards every other company had to meet. Currently, new public companies typically wait up to a year before they're eligible for major index inclusion. That waiting period exists for a reason. It lets the market establish real price discovery. It protects passive investors from being forced into untested, illiquid stocks. And Nasdaq wants to throw all of that out. For ONE listing. But the Fast Entry rule isn't even the worst part... The real scandal is the 5x float multiplier. Right now, the S&P 500 uses a free-float adjusted methodology. If only 5% of a company's shares are available for public trading, the index weights you at 5% of total market cap. That's common sense. You weight a company based on what investors can actually buy. Nasdaq's current methodology already uses total market cap rather than free-float for weighting. But for very low-float stocks, they at least had a 10% minimum float threshold. Under the new proposal, that threshold DISAPPEARS entirely. Instead, any stock with less than 20% free float gets weighted at FIVE TIMES its actual float percentage, capped at 100%. Do the math on SpaceX: If SpaceX IPOs at $1.75 trillion and floats 5% of its shares, there would be roughly $87.5 billion worth of stock available for public trading. Under Nasdaq's proposed 5x multiplier, the index would weight SpaceX at 25% of its total market cap. That means passive funds would be forced to buy as if SpaceX were a $437.5 billion company. But only $87.5 billion of stock actually exists in the market. You are forcing hundreds of billions in passive buying into a $87.5 billion float. QQQ alone manages nearly $400 billion. The total Nasdaq-100 ecosystem represents over $1.4 trillion in exposure across ETFs, mutual funds, structured notes, and derivatives. Every single passive vehicle tracking this index would be REQUIRED to buy SpaceX at whatever price the market dictates. On Day 15. With zero price discovery. Zero track record as a public company. And a float so thin you could read through it. So what this actually does is it creates a structural wealth transfer mechanism. The passive bid from index funds pushes the stock price higher. That higher price benefits exactly one group of people: the insiders and early investors who own the other 95% of the shares. And when lock-up periods expire 90 to 180 days later? Those insiders sell into the artificially inflated passive bid. Your 401(k) is the exit liquidity. This is the fundamental corruption of indexing. Indexing used to be brilliant. Low cost. Efficient. You were free-riding on the price discovery done by active managers. The index reflected the market. Now the index IS the market. Trillions of dollars flow blindly into whatever the index tells them to buy. And the people who control the index methodology are changing the rules to serve the interests of a single IPO candidate. The S&P 500 requires companies to have at least 50% of shares available for public trading. It requires 6 to 12 months of seasoning. It uses free-float adjusted weighting so passive investors aren't buying phantom liquidity. Nasdaq is doing the exact opposite. 15 days. No float requirement. 5x multiplier on insider-held shares. Every passive investor in QQQ, QQQM, and every fund benchmarked to the Nasdaq-100 should understand what's about to happen: The rules are being rewritten to benefit IPO issuers and early-stage insiders, and your capital is the tool being USED to enrich them. 45 years in this business and I've watched Wall Street find creative new ways to separate retail investors from their money in every cycle. But usually they at least try to be subtle about it. This one they put in a PDF and called it a "consultation." What's your take?

This is the most SHAMELESS structural manipulation of a major index I've ever seen. SpaceX is preparing what could be the largest IPO in history. Target valuation: $1.75 trillion. That would make it the sixth-largest company in America on day one. And Nasdaq wants the listing so badly they're literally CHANGING how the Nasdaq-100 works. In February, Nasdaq published a "consultation" proposing sweeping changes to how companies enter the index. The timing is pure coincidence, of course. Just like it's pure coincidence that SpaceX has reportedly made fast index inclusion a CONDITION of listing on Nasdaq. Here's what they're proposing: A new "Fast Entry" rule would let any newly listed company whose market cap ranks in the top 40 of current Nasdaq-100 members get added to the index after just 15 trading days. No seasoning period. No liquidity requirements. Completely exempt from the standards every other company had to meet. Currently, new public companies typically wait up to a year before they're eligible for major index inclusion. That waiting period exists for a reason. It lets the market establish real price discovery. It protects passive investors from being forced into untested, illiquid stocks. And Nasdaq wants to throw all of that out. For ONE listing. But the Fast Entry rule isn't even the worst part... The real scandal is the 5x float multiplier. Right now, the S&P 500 uses a free-float adjusted methodology. If only 5% of a company's shares are available for public trading, the index weights you at 5% of total market cap. That's common sense. You weight a company based on what investors can actually buy. Nasdaq's current methodology already uses total market cap rather than free-float for weighting. But for very low-float stocks, they at least had a 10% minimum float threshold. Under the new proposal, that threshold DISAPPEARS entirely. Instead, any stock with less than 20% free float gets weighted at FIVE TIMES its actual float percentage, capped at 100%. Do the math on SpaceX: If SpaceX IPOs at $1.75 trillion and floats 5% of its shares, there would be roughly $87.5 billion worth of stock available for public trading. Under Nasdaq's proposed 5x multiplier, the index would weight SpaceX at 25% of its total market cap. That means passive funds would be forced to buy as if SpaceX were a $437.5 billion company. But only $87.5 billion of stock actually exists in the market. You are forcing hundreds of billions in passive buying into a $87.5 billion float. QQQ alone manages nearly $400 billion. The total Nasdaq-100 ecosystem represents over $1.4 trillion in exposure across ETFs, mutual funds, structured notes, and derivatives. Every single passive vehicle tracking this index would be REQUIRED to buy SpaceX at whatever price the market dictates. On Day 15. With zero price discovery. Zero track record as a public company. And a float so thin you could read through it. So what this actually does is it creates a structural wealth transfer mechanism. The passive bid from index funds pushes the stock price higher. That higher price benefits exactly one group of people: the insiders and early investors who own the other 95% of the shares. And when lock-up periods expire 90 to 180 days later? Those insiders sell into the artificially inflated passive bid. Your 401(k) is the exit liquidity. This is the fundamental corruption of indexing. Indexing used to be brilliant. Low cost. Efficient. You were free-riding on the price discovery done by active managers. The index reflected the market. Now the index IS the market. Trillions of dollars flow blindly into whatever the index tells them to buy. And the people who control the index methodology are changing the rules to serve the interests of a single IPO candidate. The S&P 500 requires companies to have at least 50% of shares available for public trading. It requires 6 to 12 months of seasoning. It uses free-float adjusted weighting so passive investors aren't buying phantom liquidity. Nasdaq is doing the exact opposite. 15 days. No float requirement. 5x multiplier on insider-held shares. Every passive investor in QQQ, QQQM, and every fund benchmarked to the Nasdaq-100 should understand what's about to happen: The rules are being rewritten to benefit IPO issuers and early-stage insiders, and your capital is the tool being USED to enrich them. 45 years in this business and I've watched Wall Street find creative new ways to separate retail investors from their money in every cycle. But usually they at least try to be subtle about it. This one they put in a PDF and called it a "consultation." What's your take?

George Noble

868,034 次观看 • 3 个月前

Alignment is key. Sometimes it's not how long you have known a person, it is whether you are both aligned on the central goal. Don't be static move as things evolve.

Alignment is key. Sometimes it's not how long you have known a person, it is whether you are both aligned on the central goal. Don't be static move as things evolve.

POJU OYEMADE

11,529 次观看 • 1 个月前

Bitcoin DeFi is a trillion dollar opportunity. As Bitcoin scales, more users will need to transact on fast, low-cost L1s like Core. This is how the asset and the network evolve together. 🔶

Bitcoin DeFi is a trillion dollar opportunity. As Bitcoin scales, more users will need to transact on fast, low-cost L1s like Core. This is how the asset and the network evolve together. 🔶

Core DAO 🔶

26,710 次观看 • 11 个月前

The next step for SpaceX is catching the ship — something they haven’t done yet A test is expected later this year

The next step for SpaceX is catching the ship — something they haven’t done yet A test is expected later this year

Dima Zeniuk

1,534,375 次观看 • 11 个月前

Trump wants the Pentagon budget increased by 50% for next year. That’s $1.5 trillion. We just found out this week that the Pentagon wasted $93 BILLION IN ONE MONTH on things like shellfish, parties and a piano, and you think we’re going to give them more money to waste? Barrels of NO.

Trump wants the Pentagon budget increased by 50% for next year. That’s $1.5 trillion. We just found out this week that the Pentagon wasted $93 BILLION IN ONE MONTH on things like shellfish, parties and a piano, and you think we’re going to give them more money to waste? Barrels of NO.

Dittie

12,947 次观看 • 3 个月前

The publisher is desperate for sales. Oprah couldn't move this book and one week later they hit the bottom of the barrel...

The publisher is desperate for sales. Oprah couldn't move this book and one week later they hit the bottom of the barrel...

AppleBear

26,131 次观看 • 1 年前

Latest airmass forecast shows cooler air likely to move in next week. Bad news for the heating bills given the price increases 😬

Latest airmass forecast shows cooler air likely to move in next week. Bad news for the heating bills given the price increases 😬

Carlow Weather

63,602 次观看 • 3 个月前

Truckload rejections pop to 14.01%, near the highest levels they've been in years. It is notable that this is happening in Mid-February, normally one of the worst months for freight. Shippers should prepare for significant rate increases this year and even if carriers participated in the RFP, expect higher rate concessions later in the year as fleet execs gain conviction.

Truckload rejections pop to 14.01%, near the highest levels they've been in years. It is notable that this is happening in Mid-February, normally one of the worst months for freight. Shippers should prepare for significant rate increases this year and even if carriers participated in the RFP, expect higher rate concessions later in the year as fleet execs gain conviction.

Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️

50,966 次观看 • 4 个月前

All fast food restaurants have indicated a move to AI kitchens starting later this year. At this rate, we’re going to need more homeless shelters.

All fast food restaurants have indicated a move to AI kitchens starting later this year. At this rate, we’re going to need more homeless shelters.

King Arthur Fan

42,090 次观看 • 2 个月前

7 years later and this is still of the most UNIQUE flows i’ve ever heard

7 years later and this is still of the most UNIQUE flows i’ve ever heard

welp.

1,897,728 次观看 • 1 年前

This is what we are going to do today to prepare for next week. Nifty outlook for the week month or year ahead.

This is what we are going to do today to prepare for next week. Nifty outlook for the week month or year ahead.

Rohit Srivastava

13,578 次观看 • 3 个月前