Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

NG-CDF cannot be oversighted by the same MPs who manage it. Executive functions must be separated from oversight functions.

15,671 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

kevo profil fotoğrafı
kevo1 yıl önce

Today, they have organised PR Public participation to endorse the illegality.Its being carried by Parliament through MPs Manager.

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple profil fotoğrafı
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 yıl önce

🤝 Interviewing with HR or non-technical managers? 🌟 Employers value clarity and confidence. Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone teaches you to explain cybersecurity concepts in a way everyone can understand. Build connections that matter! 🌟

Fidel Castro Ongoya Hill profil fotoğrafı
Fidel Castro Ongoya Hill1 yıl önce

Good point SC , the Mp's present are not ready to do what is right . @otienowill kudos

Ironfist profil fotoğrafı
Ironfist1 yıl önce

Hapo ndio, these many stories about how CDF has transformed rural areas without any comparisons is pure nonsense. Let the county government take care of those resources, and then we can compare.

Doktari Kumar 🇰🇪 🇩🇪🇺🇬 profil fotoğrafı
Doktari Kumar 🇰🇪 🇩🇪🇺🇬1 yıl önce

@NGCDF_Kenya is cash cow and manipulation tool for @NAssemblyKE

Daudi'.❄💊💉 profil fotoğrafı
Daudi'.❄💊💉1 yıl önce

Bwana what is your next plan we really need you somewhere in this Kenya???? @otienowill

Bgzfix33🐔 profil fotoğrafı
Bgzfix33🐔1 yıl önce

Very true its a feduciary breach.t h e Equity maxims: “No one can be judge in their own cause,” and “A trustee must not profit from the trust.” To resolve this, Kenya must: Fully separate NG-CDF management from MPs.Establish independent Constituency Fund Boards, subject to audit

Iphan profil fotoğrafı
Iphan1 yıl önce

Are you aware even university student leaders have bursary fund that they give to student and that its marred with corruption just like the other bursaries??? Now you know!

Geoffrey Otieno profil fotoğrafı
Geoffrey Otieno1 yıl önce

correct indeed

Max Elmer🇰🇪 profil fotoğrafı
Max Elmer🇰🇪1 yıl önce

On this I agree with you.

Mao Deh profil fotoğrafı
Mao Deh1 yıl önce

NG CDF NGAAF & 'senate oversight fund' should not exist

Benzer Videolar

Singing Vande Mataram in full is not “optional,” nor is it a matter of a State casually choosing whether to comply. The Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines are explicit: whenever Vande Mataram is rendered at official functions, the full official version is to be sung, and all six stanzas are to be played at designated government events. The guidelines further prescribe the occasions on which it must be rendered and the protocol to be followed, including standing in attention. The argument that Parliament must first pass a law before such protocols become binding on government functions is flawed. Every aspect of governance does not require a separate Act of Parliament. The Union Government routinely issues executive directions, protocols, and administrative instructions governing official ceremonies, state functions, national symbols, and public administration. These flow from the executive authority of the Union under the Constitution. A State government cannot simply declare a Union protocol governing national observances “optional” because it disagrees with it politically. If every State began selectively deciding which national protocols it would or would not follow, the very idea of uniform national observances would collapse. Vande Mataram is not a partisan slogan. It is India’s National Song and a foundational symbol of the freedom movement. Treating its prescribed rendition at official functions as a matter of political convenience says more about the insecurities of those objecting to it than about the directive itself.

Amit Malviya

47,638 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce