正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Nick Bostrom says the human brain is not the ceiling for intelligence Our brains are small, slow, and limited by biology, while machines can scale far beyond those constraints "in the long run, cognitive systems could surpass not only any individual human, but even our collective intelligence"

Haider.

69,349 subscribers

27,392 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is Kiki and she gives us insights on who we are. Not only in human compassion but in understanding we don’t know the limits to our intelligence nor the intelligence of other species.

This is Kiki and she gives us insights on who we are. Not only in human compassion but in understanding we don’t know the limits to our intelligence nor the intelligence of other species.

Brian Roemmele

80,526 次观看 • 9 个月前

“Intelligence is being scaled. Care is not.” Geoffrey Hinton says the AI race is optimizing for intelligence, not for the kind of beings we’re creating. If labs are chasing IPOs and trillion-dollar valuations, the obvious move is to scale compute and ship faster. But smarter systems are not automatically systems that care about us.

“Intelligence is being scaled. Care is not.” Geoffrey Hinton says the AI race is optimizing for intelligence, not for the kind of beings we’re creating. If labs are chasing IPOs and trillion-dollar valuations, the obvious move is to scale compute and ship faster. But smarter systems are not automatically systems that care about us.

Jon Hernandez

15,158 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

ELON CLIPS

32,399 次观看 • 7 个月前

Cognitive scientist Joscha Bach: "at the moment, we are not building systems that are minds — we are building systems that predict text and visual patterns made for human consumption" True machine perception has never been tried, but once it is, it may surpass human reasoning

Cognitive scientist Joscha Bach: "at the moment, we are not building systems that are minds — we are building systems that predict text and visual patterns made for human consumption" True machine perception has never been tried, but once it is, it may surpass human reasoning

Haider.

61,397 次观看 • 2 个月前

Mark Zuckerberg says general intelligence is coming — systems smarter than any individual Even today, collective systems like companies are already more intelligent than a single person. "in the future, almost everyone will use the power of a 10,000-person organization"

Mark Zuckerberg says general intelligence is coming — systems smarter than any individual Even today, collective systems like companies are already more intelligent than a single person. "in the future, almost everyone will use the power of a 10,000-person organization"

Haider.

201,042 次观看 • 1 年前

Nick Bostrom says AI is already showing creativity by building on learned patterns, much like the human brain We build on what others discovered, make new leaps from it, and call that creativity "whatever the brain can do, machines will do better and faster, with more compelling symphonies"

Nick Bostrom says AI is already showing creativity by building on learned patterns, much like the human brain We build on what others discovered, make new leaps from it, and call that creativity "whatever the brain can do, machines will do better and faster, with more compelling symphonies"

Haider.

11,084 次观看 • 5 个月前

Every major turning point in human history had a moment where the people closest to it understood what was coming and everyone else didn’t. The printing press. The atomic bomb. The internet. Dario Amodei is trying to close that gap. Most people still aren’t listening. Amodei: “My fundamental view is that AI has been on an exponential for the last ten years and as part of a sort of Moore’s law for intelligence.” Not a metaphor. A measured curve. Not slowing. Accelerating. We are “well advanced on that curve” with a “small number of years” remaining before AI surpasses human cognitive capability across most things. Amodei: “We’re increasingly close to what I’ve called a country of geniuses in a data center.” Not one system. A coordinated set of AI agents, each more capable than most humans at most things, running in parallel, never sleeping, never losing focus, coordinating at speeds no biological intelligence can match. The ceiling on human progress has always been simple. Genius is rare and time is finite. That constraint is gone. We are not approaching the ceiling of intelligence. We are approaching the ceiling of intelligence that biology can produce. Those are not the same ceiling. The human brain is constrained by evolution, energy, skull size, and lifespan. AI has none of those limits. We have no framework for what intelligence looks like when you remove every biological constraint that shaped ours. Every tool we use to comprehend it is built from a mind it will surpass. Amodei: “AI models surpassing the cognitive capabilities of most humans for most things.” The upsides are “absolutely staggering.” So are the consequences. Displacement. Misuse. A period of disruption that reshapes how most people work, earn, and find purpose before the benefits reach them. The same exponential that produces the cures produces the chaos. They arrive together. That’s the optimistic read. The other read is this. We are building it without international standards in place. Racing to deploy before solving displacement or misuse. And once it’s operating beyond our ability to fully comprehend or follow, managing the disruption stops being something we do. It becomes something we experience while hoping the intelligence we created decides keeping us around still serves its objectives. Every turning point in history looks inevitable in hindsight. The people inside the moment never saw it that cleanly. We’re inside the moment.

Every major turning point in human history had a moment where the people closest to it understood what was coming and everyone else didn’t. The printing press. The atomic bomb. The internet. Dario Amodei is trying to close that gap. Most people still aren’t listening. Amodei: “My fundamental view is that AI has been on an exponential for the last ten years and as part of a sort of Moore’s law for intelligence.” Not a metaphor. A measured curve. Not slowing. Accelerating. We are “well advanced on that curve” with a “small number of years” remaining before AI surpasses human cognitive capability across most things. Amodei: “We’re increasingly close to what I’ve called a country of geniuses in a data center.” Not one system. A coordinated set of AI agents, each more capable than most humans at most things, running in parallel, never sleeping, never losing focus, coordinating at speeds no biological intelligence can match. The ceiling on human progress has always been simple. Genius is rare and time is finite. That constraint is gone. We are not approaching the ceiling of intelligence. We are approaching the ceiling of intelligence that biology can produce. Those are not the same ceiling. The human brain is constrained by evolution, energy, skull size, and lifespan. AI has none of those limits. We have no framework for what intelligence looks like when you remove every biological constraint that shaped ours. Every tool we use to comprehend it is built from a mind it will surpass. Amodei: “AI models surpassing the cognitive capabilities of most humans for most things.” The upsides are “absolutely staggering.” So are the consequences. Displacement. Misuse. A period of disruption that reshapes how most people work, earn, and find purpose before the benefits reach them. The same exponential that produces the cures produces the chaos. They arrive together. That’s the optimistic read. The other read is this. We are building it without international standards in place. Racing to deploy before solving displacement or misuse. And once it’s operating beyond our ability to fully comprehend or follow, managing the disruption stops being something we do. It becomes something we experience while hoping the intelligence we created decides keeping us around still serves its objectives. Every turning point in history looks inevitable in hindsight. The people inside the moment never saw it that cleanly. We’re inside the moment.

Dustin

47,215 次观看 • 7 个月前

For the Cockroaches of India. For those Ch**ails who are standing in front of our forces and abusing them. You are not only individual who has human rights and the freedom of expression, the forces have the same right too.

For the Cockroaches of India. For those Ch**ails who are standing in front of our forces and abusing them. You are not only individual who has human rights and the freedom of expression, the forces have the same right too.

Dr Poornima 🇮🇳

19,431 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles

13,096 次观看 • 7 个月前

Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI: "Artificial intelligence is nothing but digital brains inside large computers." Sit with how flatly he says it. Not a metaphor, not marketing. The seat of intelligence in a human is a biological brain. The seat of intelligence in AI is an artificial one. Same thing, different substrate. Right now, he admits, it only "understands mostly, sort of." But that gap is temporary. In his words: "the day will come when the digital brains that live inside our computers will become as good and even better than our own biological brains. Computers will become smarter than us." He makes it concrete. Once an AI is built to be a doctor, with every medical paper and billions of hours of clinical experience, always on and almost free, "we will look back at today's health care similarly to how we look at 16th century dentistry." Hinton says it already understands. Ilya says the brain is just built differently. Either way, the argument was never whether it thinks. It was whether we were ready for the answer.

Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI: "Artificial intelligence is nothing but digital brains inside large computers." Sit with how flatly he says it. Not a metaphor, not marketing. The seat of intelligence in a human is a biological brain. The seat of intelligence in AI is an artificial one. Same thing, different substrate. Right now, he admits, it only "understands mostly, sort of." But that gap is temporary. In his words: "the day will come when the digital brains that live inside our computers will become as good and even better than our own biological brains. Computers will become smarter than us." He makes it concrete. Once an AI is built to be a doctor, with every medical paper and billions of hours of clinical experience, always on and almost free, "we will look back at today's health care similarly to how we look at 16th century dentistry." Hinton says it already understands. Ilya says the brain is just built differently. Either way, the argument was never whether it thinks. It was whether we were ready for the answer.

Casper

69,518 次观看 • 2 个月前

Google's DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis: AGI is a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities that humans have. The brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is possible. Today’s systems are impressive — but they’re not there yet. We’ve still got at least another 5–10 years to go. AI could be the ultimate tool for accelerating scientific discovery. We can tackle disease, climate, inequality. It could be the ultimate enhancement tool for human scientists. The potential is there — if we do it the right way.

Google's DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis: AGI is a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities that humans have. The brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is possible. Today’s systems are impressive — but they’re not there yet. We’ve still got at least another 5–10 years to go. AI could be the ultimate tool for accelerating scientific discovery. We can tackle disease, climate, inequality. It could be the ultimate enhancement tool for human scientists. The potential is there — if we do it the right way.

Clash Report

22,086 次观看 • 7 个月前

Palantir Chief Architect Akshay Krishnaswamy joins Senior Counselor Jordan Hirsch to discuss the future of work and artificial intelligence. Building on the Working Intelligence project showcasing AI deployments that enhance workers ( Akshay explains how properly built AI systems can liberate human creativity and capture the vast untapped intelligence in the people on the frontline — making those with the deepest expertise not expendable, but ever more valuable.

Palantir Chief Architect Akshay Krishnaswamy joins Senior Counselor Jordan Hirsch to discuss the future of work and artificial intelligence. Building on the Working Intelligence project showcasing AI deployments that enhance workers ( Akshay explains how properly built AI systems can liberate human creativity and capture the vast untapped intelligence in the people on the frontline — making those with the deepest expertise not expendable, but ever more valuable.

Palantir

61,386 次观看 • 7 个月前

People say AI is expensive. Let me break it down. I pay $200 a month for Claude and get PhD-level intelligence on every subject known to humanity. Now price a human. Globally, on average, maybe $10,000 a year in food to run one brain. Plus the twenty odd years it takes to grow it first. So it's $10,000 a year for human-level compute, versus $200 a month for intelligence that clears any human on any topic. That's why it's scaling this fast. The price of human intelligence is just uneconomical compared to machines.

People say AI is expensive. Let me break it down. I pay $200 a month for Claude and get PhD-level intelligence on every subject known to humanity. Now price a human. Globally, on average, maybe $10,000 a year in food to run one brain. Plus the twenty odd years it takes to grow it first. So it's $10,000 a year for human-level compute, versus $200 a month for intelligence that clears any human on any topic. That's why it's scaling this fast. The price of human intelligence is just uneconomical compared to machines.

Raoul Pal

185,885 次观看 • 2 个月前

Every time someone tells me AI will soon surpass the human brain, I pause. An NVIDIA H100 can perform around 200 trillion operations per second. It requires massive power, cooling systems, and heavy infrastructure. Your brain? Roughly one quadrillion synaptic operations per second. Running on about 20 watts. Less than a dim light bulb. We celebrate AI for its scale and speed. But it depends on predefined architectures, labeled data, and external power. The brain learns continuously. Adapts without instructions. Integrates emotion into decisions. Generates original thought under uncertainty. This gap is not just about intelligence. It is about efficiency and adaptability shaped by millions of years of evolution. AI will dominate narrow domains. But the human brain remains the most energy-efficient, flexible computing system we know. Are we underestimating biology while overestimating silicon? #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Neuroscience #DeepTech #Innovation #FutureOfTechnology

Every time someone tells me AI will soon surpass the human brain, I pause. An NVIDIA H100 can perform around 200 trillion operations per second. It requires massive power, cooling systems, and heavy infrastructure. Your brain? Roughly one quadrillion synaptic operations per second. Running on about 20 watts. Less than a dim light bulb. We celebrate AI for its scale and speed. But it depends on predefined architectures, labeled data, and external power. The brain learns continuously. Adapts without instructions. Integrates emotion into decisions. Generates original thought under uncertainty. This gap is not just about intelligence. It is about efficiency and adaptability shaped by millions of years of evolution. AI will dominate narrow domains. But the human brain remains the most energy-efficient, flexible computing system we know. Are we underestimating biology while overestimating silicon? #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Neuroscience #DeepTech #Innovation #FutureOfTechnology

Pascal Bornet

31,249 次观看 • 6 个月前