正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Nick Fuentes thinks Tucker Carlson needs to cool it with the antisemitic remarks. “I'm against blood guilt. Tucker seems to hate Jews. I don't because I'm a Christian and I hate blood guilt.”

Fuentes Updates

278,173 subscribers

390,375 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Nick BLASTS Tucker Carlson for hating Jеws 🤔 "Tucker seems to hate Jеws; I don't because I am a Christian and I hate blood guilt."

Nick BLASTS Tucker Carlson for hating Jеws 🤔 "Tucker seems to hate Jеws; I don't because I am a Christian and I hate blood guilt."

S.clips

30,758 次观看 • 6 个月前

Nick Fuentes on Tucker Carlson's Anti Semitism & his hatred for Israel.. "I agree with Tucker on a lot of things, but I don't agree with the Blood Guilt."

Nick Fuentes on Tucker Carlson's Anti Semitism & his hatred for Israel.. "I agree with Tucker on a lot of things, but I don't agree with the Blood Guilt."

KaizerRev

59,469 次观看 • 1 个月前

“There's no such thing as blood guilt.” Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes debate identity politics and collective punishment.

“There's no such thing as blood guilt.” Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes debate identity politics and collective punishment.

Tucker Carlson Network

60,899 次观看 • 11 个月前

Nick Fuentes responds back to Tucker Carlson after he doubled down against White Identity & discredits anyone who talks about it. Tucker thinks the solution is Liberalism & that Blood Guilt is wrong. That mentality is what created Open Borders, The Civil Rights Act & DEI.

Nick Fuentes responds back to Tucker Carlson after he doubled down against White Identity & discredits anyone who talks about it. Tucker thinks the solution is Liberalism & that Blood Guilt is wrong. That mentality is what created Open Borders, The Civil Rights Act & DEI.

KaizerRev

25,483 次观看 • 4 个月前

Fuentes gives a fiery response to Ben Shapiro and Tucker Carlson for straw-manning his arguments about jewish influence "Stop giving me the speech about blood guilt! Point me to the person who is saying all jews must pay just for the crime of being jewish. I don't see him!"

Fuentes gives a fiery response to Ben Shapiro and Tucker Carlson for straw-manning his arguments about jewish influence "Stop giving me the speech about blood guilt! Point me to the person who is saying all jews must pay just for the crime of being jewish. I don't see him!"

Fuentes Updates

72,540 次观看 • 9 个月前

Nick Fuentes reacts to Tucker Carlson’s BIZARRE lies about JD Vance in his interview with the NYT and his WACKY blood guilt fixation 🤨 “Tucker says I am a calculated distraction dividing the nation so that JD Vance can’t win the presidency or something. Ok I guess???”

Nick Fuentes reacts to Tucker Carlson’s BIZARRE lies about JD Vance in his interview with the NYT and his WACKY blood guilt fixation 🤨 “Tucker says I am a calculated distraction dividing the nation so that JD Vance can’t win the presidency or something. Ok I guess???”

S.clips

16,341 次观看 • 5 个月前

Tucker Carlson to Nick Fuentes: “I dislike Christian Zionists more than anybody.. it’s Christian heresy”

Tucker Carlson to Nick Fuentes: “I dislike Christian Zionists more than anybody.. it’s Christian heresy”

Open Source Intel

110,668 次观看 • 11 个月前

Tucker is WRONG about identity politics. Whites don't believe in blood guilt. Blacks, jews, hispanics... do. "Every non-White person that has ever shot, stabbed or raped a White boy or girl believed in blood guilt"

Tucker is WRONG about identity politics. Whites don't believe in blood guilt. Blacks, jews, hispanics... do. "Every non-White person that has ever shot, stabbed or raped a White boy or girl believed in blood guilt"

1stclassclips

69,013 次观看 • 4 个月前

Mark Levin cries about Tucker Carlson & says he's worse than Nick Fuentes because Tucker "contributed mightily" to hate & violence against Jews in America.. Levin then says Nick should not have pepper sprayed & pushed Marla Rose after she trespassed at his house.

Mark Levin cries about Tucker Carlson & says he's worse than Nick Fuentes because Tucker "contributed mightily" to hate & violence against Jews in America.. Levin then says Nick should not have pepper sprayed & pushed Marla Rose after she trespassed at his house.

KaizerRev

47,879 次观看 • 5 个月前

Tucker Carlson CREATED the "Christianity rejects blood guilt" line to shield his anti-Semitism — and libel Judaism. Now JD Vance endorses it as a way to FIGHT anti-Semitism. But it gets worse. Tucker's ugliest lie about Judaism is claiming "Christianity alone" rejects "blood guilt" — even though the actual concept ("sins of the father") comes from the Hebrew Bible, with several direct, on-point passages (e.g. - Deut. 24:16, Ezek. 18:20). It's so egregious that literally no one else besides Tucker has claimed that the "Christian Gospel" rejects "blood guilt" and thus also anti-Semitism. (Vance just became the second person, and only during his RJC talk.) This "blood guilt" lie quickly springboards into Judaism supposedly endorsing genocide. Building on the false separation between Christianity & Judaism, Tucker suggests that Jews actually BELIEVE IN "blood guilt," leading the Jewish state to commit genocide — including the intentional murder of women and children — on religious grounds. In his first public airing of his "blood guilt" shtick with British host Harry Cole in October 2025, Tucker spent a few seconds claiming that because of his theory, anti-Semitism was "anti-Christian." But he immediately pivoted to slandering the Jewish state. "[Blood guilt] is not a concept in other religions, I've noticed, but it's a concept in my religion. We reject blood guilt... That is not the perspective of the Israeli government, which is killing women and children in Gaza 'because they're all terrorists because they're all Palestinian.' I'm a Christian. I reject that." In short, Tucker's "blood guilt" argument primarily serves to libel Israel by lying about Judaism. Vance did NOT voice the anti-Jewish, anti-Israel stuff to RJC, obviously, and there are many reasons (including mutual friends that he & I have) to believe that he's not anti-Semitic. But even if Vance completely discards any & all of his friend's anti-Semitic teachings, the fact that he unapologetically consulted with Tucker very recently is deeply troubling. Never mind that it was for discussing anti-Semitism with a Jewish audience. But Tucker also hates a whole litany of things that Republicans love, from free markets to Trump. Yet Vance is STILL taking guidance from the man who has become his boss's most impassioned critic. Why?

Tucker Carlson CREATED the "Christianity rejects blood guilt" line to shield his anti-Semitism — and libel Judaism. Now JD Vance endorses it as a way to FIGHT anti-Semitism. But it gets worse. Tucker's ugliest lie about Judaism is claiming "Christianity alone" rejects "blood guilt" — even though the actual concept ("sins of the father") comes from the Hebrew Bible, with several direct, on-point passages (e.g. - Deut. 24:16, Ezek. 18:20). It's so egregious that literally no one else besides Tucker has claimed that the "Christian Gospel" rejects "blood guilt" and thus also anti-Semitism. (Vance just became the second person, and only during his RJC talk.) This "blood guilt" lie quickly springboards into Judaism supposedly endorsing genocide. Building on the false separation between Christianity & Judaism, Tucker suggests that Jews actually BELIEVE IN "blood guilt," leading the Jewish state to commit genocide — including the intentional murder of women and children — on religious grounds. In his first public airing of his "blood guilt" shtick with British host Harry Cole in October 2025, Tucker spent a few seconds claiming that because of his theory, anti-Semitism was "anti-Christian." But he immediately pivoted to slandering the Jewish state. "[Blood guilt] is not a concept in other religions, I've noticed, but it's a concept in my religion. We reject blood guilt... That is not the perspective of the Israeli government, which is killing women and children in Gaza 'because they're all terrorists because they're all Palestinian.' I'm a Christian. I reject that." In short, Tucker's "blood guilt" argument primarily serves to libel Israel by lying about Judaism. Vance did NOT voice the anti-Jewish, anti-Israel stuff to RJC, obviously, and there are many reasons (including mutual friends that he & I have) to believe that he's not anti-Semitic. But even if Vance completely discards any & all of his friend's anti-Semitic teachings, the fact that he unapologetically consulted with Tucker very recently is deeply troubling. Never mind that it was for discussing anti-Semitism with a Jewish audience. But Tucker also hates a whole litany of things that Republicans love, from free markets to Trump. Yet Vance is STILL taking guidance from the man who has become his boss's most impassioned critic. Why?

Joel Mowbray

37,320 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tucker Carlson exposes Mark Levin's call to murder civilians and children in Gaza. He argues this is the same "blood guilt" ideology that animated the Nazis.

Tucker Carlson exposes Mark Levin's call to murder civilians and children in Gaza. He argues this is the same "blood guilt" ideology that animated the Nazis.

Furkan Gözükara

58,765 次观看 • 10 个月前

Nick Fuentes defends James Fishback after JD Vance attacked him for “blood guilt” “If anything James Fishback is the least extreme. Yet he’s engaging in blood guilt, but Candace Owens isn’t? So calling them 'filthy реdорhіӏеѕ', I guess that's not a blood guilt comment!”

Nick Fuentes defends James Fishback after JD Vance attacked him for “blood guilt” “If anything James Fishback is the least extreme. Yet he’s engaging in blood guilt, but Candace Owens isn’t? So calling them 'filthy реdорhіӏеѕ', I guess that's not a blood guilt comment!”

𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬

10,628 次观看 • 1 个月前

Nick Fuentes does a Tucker Carlson impression with 100% accuracy 😂 The NFL picked Bad Bunny for the halftime show because THEY HATE US AND WANT US TO FEEL BAD ABOUT OURSELVES!!!

Nick Fuentes does a Tucker Carlson impression with 100% accuracy 😂 The NFL picked Bad Bunny for the halftime show because THEY HATE US AND WANT US TO FEEL BAD ABOUT OURSELVES!!!

Fuentes Updates

132,226 次观看 • 7 个月前

Nick Fuentes explains why Vance talked about "blood guilt." Vance didn't just hear it from Tucker's show, Tucker is using this rhetoric to give Vance plausible deniability. "Tucker's show exists to seed the ground for a Vance For President campaign."

Nick Fuentes explains why Vance talked about "blood guilt." Vance didn't just hear it from Tucker's show, Tucker is using this rhetoric to give Vance plausible deniability. "Tucker's show exists to seed the ground for a Vance For President campaign."

Fuentes Updates

12,177 次观看 • 1 个月前

Hasan Piker: “I don’t trust Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson or even Nick Fuentes want to make America Israel. What Israel has done for Jews, they want to design America in the same exact vision for Christian Nationalists, their own personal in-group. That’s still objectively fascist and I’m an anti-fascist. That’s why I oppose Israel, that’s why I oppose Tucker Carlson”

Hasan Piker: “I don’t trust Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson or even Nick Fuentes want to make America Israel. What Israel has done for Jews, they want to design America in the same exact vision for Christian Nationalists, their own personal in-group. That’s still objectively fascist and I’m an anti-fascist. That’s why I oppose Israel, that’s why I oppose Tucker Carlson”

Marco Foster

535,008 次观看 • 3 个月前

ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, while speaking before an LA synagogue, suggests he's helping people "behind the scenes" to "take down" Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson and Hasan Piker. "I need people on the right to take down Tucker Carlson—so I'm trying to help Ted Cruz," Greenblatt reveals. "I need people on the right to take down Nick Fuentes—so I'm trying to help people like Ben [Shapiro]." He says he's doing the "same thing on the left." Nicholas J. Fuentes | Tucker Carlson | hasanabi

ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, while speaking before an LA synagogue, suggests he's helping people "behind the scenes" to "take down" Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson and Hasan Piker. "I need people on the right to take down Tucker Carlson—so I'm trying to help Ted Cruz," Greenblatt reveals. "I need people on the right to take down Nick Fuentes—so I'm trying to help people like Ben [Shapiro]." He says he's doing the "same thing on the left." Nicholas J. Fuentes | Tucker Carlson | hasanabi

Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

1,589,611 次观看 • 8 个月前

I don't think JD Vance knows what a blood libel is. He defines it here as the idea that “because of your genetics, because of your blood, because of your ancestry, you are guilty of a crime that you never committed.” That's not what a blood libel is. The classic blood libel was the fabricated accusation that Jews murdered Christian children and used their blood for religious purposes, most famously in connection with Passover. The power of the blood libel wasn't that every single Jew was personally accused of murdering a child. It was the invention of some monstrous secret Jewish crime, repeated until ordinary people came to believe that Jews were capable of it. What Vance is describing is closer to blood guilt or classical racial prejudice. These people are bad because of their ancestry, ethnicity or religion. That's not really what people like Tucker are doing, at least not yet. Tucker doesn't generally tell his audience that Jews are bad because they were born Jewish. He tells them that Jews, “Zionists,” Chabad, Jewish donors or Israel's American supporters are actually doing terrible things. Part of what makes the blood libel so effective is that it comes with its own defense against accusations of antisemitism. "I don't hate Jews because they're Jewish. I hate them because they're murdering Christian children." The modern version works the same way. "I don't hate Jews because they're Jewish. I hate Israel (read Jews) because they deliberately murder innocent Palestinian children." Not because of any rational explanation such as that children tragically die in war, but because Israelis supposedly want to kill them, enjoy killing them or simply don't care. Understanding what a blood libel actually is would help Vance understand why so many Jews are horrified by what Tucker Carlson has been doing. A perfect example is Tucker's claim that Chabad was helping drive America into a religious war with Iran whose end goal was destroying Al Aqsa and rebuilding the Third Temple. The problem with Tucker isn't that he criticizes Israel. It's the endless production of sinister accusations about Jews and the institutions associated with them, followed by millions of people being told that “these people” are secretly screwing them. And fighting this is difficult because you have to do two things at once. Identify the antisemitic mechanism and dismantle the underlying lie. That's even harder in a global information environment where governments, activists and hostile states have their own reasons for pushing false or wildly distorted claims about Israel and inflaming divisions inside America. Vance says the “core of antisemitism” is the blood libel. And he's right. He just doesn't seem to understand what a blood libel is, or recognize the modern version when it's sitting right next to him.

I don't think JD Vance knows what a blood libel is. He defines it here as the idea that “because of your genetics, because of your blood, because of your ancestry, you are guilty of a crime that you never committed.” That's not what a blood libel is. The classic blood libel was the fabricated accusation that Jews murdered Christian children and used their blood for religious purposes, most famously in connection with Passover. The power of the blood libel wasn't that every single Jew was personally accused of murdering a child. It was the invention of some monstrous secret Jewish crime, repeated until ordinary people came to believe that Jews were capable of it. What Vance is describing is closer to blood guilt or classical racial prejudice. These people are bad because of their ancestry, ethnicity or religion. That's not really what people like Tucker are doing, at least not yet. Tucker doesn't generally tell his audience that Jews are bad because they were born Jewish. He tells them that Jews, “Zionists,” Chabad, Jewish donors or Israel's American supporters are actually doing terrible things. Part of what makes the blood libel so effective is that it comes with its own defense against accusations of antisemitism. "I don't hate Jews because they're Jewish. I hate them because they're murdering Christian children." The modern version works the same way. "I don't hate Jews because they're Jewish. I hate Israel (read Jews) because they deliberately murder innocent Palestinian children." Not because of any rational explanation such as that children tragically die in war, but because Israelis supposedly want to kill them, enjoy killing them or simply don't care. Understanding what a blood libel actually is would help Vance understand why so many Jews are horrified by what Tucker Carlson has been doing. A perfect example is Tucker's claim that Chabad was helping drive America into a religious war with Iran whose end goal was destroying Al Aqsa and rebuilding the Third Temple. The problem with Tucker isn't that he criticizes Israel. It's the endless production of sinister accusations about Jews and the institutions associated with them, followed by millions of people being told that “these people” are secretly screwing them. And fighting this is difficult because you have to do two things at once. Identify the antisemitic mechanism and dismantle the underlying lie. That's even harder in a global information environment where governments, activists and hostile states have their own reasons for pushing false or wildly distorted claims about Israel and inflaming divisions inside America. Vance says the “core of antisemitism” is the blood libel. And he's right. He just doesn't seem to understand what a blood libel is, or recognize the modern version when it's sitting right next to him.

Yehuda Teitelbaum

27,246 次观看 • 1 个月前

Nick Fuentes on Tucker Carlson pleading with j*wish groups like the ADL during his speech at AmFest. “ADL is a hate group…they do hate us!”

Nick Fuentes on Tucker Carlson pleading with j*wish groups like the ADL during his speech at AmFest. “ADL is a hate group…they do hate us!”

Charging…

21,810 次观看 • 9 个月前

.JD Vance did not address Tucker Carlson last night RJC. But he repeated a very particular Tucker argument. On anti-Semitism, no less. The source had to be Tucker because only Tucker makes the specific claim — precisely because it is so Biblically illiterate that no serious religious figure would make it. Vance repeated almost entirely Tucker's stock explanation that he can't be anti-Semitic because Christianity rejects the concept of blood guilt, or the notion of sins passing from the father to the son. Crucially, the idea that Christianity opposes anti-Semitism because the Gospel rejects "blood guilt" is uniquely Tucker Carlson's, at least among public figures or published works. No one else relies on this argument for two reasons: (1) It's Biblically illiterate, ignoring that it originated as a Jewish concept (Deut. 24:16, Ezek. 18:20, etc.), and (2) Tucker primarily uses it to lie about Judaism (that it DOES believe in blood guilt) and claim that the Jewish state wants to kill Palestinian children on religious grounds. Vance exhibited the same Biblical ignorance when he cited only to the Christian Gospel for the rejection of sins of the father. Vance was so unfamiliar with this argument and still trying to grasp it that he repeatedly said "blood libel," when he clearly meant "blood guilt." That Vance is getting coached on the intersectionality of the Gospel and anti-Semitism is bad enough. What's worse is that this particular religious myth that Tucker pushes — that "Christianity alone" rejects "blood guilt" — is perhaps his most pernicious libel of Judaism. Tucker uses this lie specifically in order to drive a wedge between those of Jewish and Christian faiths by gaslighting the former and persuading some portion of the latter that the two religions are somehow diametrically opposed to each other. Vance doesn't repeat that lie, thankfully, but what's particularly revealing is that the VP apparently has never before publicly used this "blood guilt" argument. Which means, of course, that he presumably learned it recently. And pretty much the only source for him learning that is... Tucker himself, given that (again) no one else makes this claim. So Vance appears to have prepared for discussing anti-Semitism at RJC by studying with Tucker Carlson. Oy.

.JD Vance did not address Tucker Carlson last night RJC. But he repeated a very particular Tucker argument. On anti-Semitism, no less. The source had to be Tucker because only Tucker makes the specific claim — precisely because it is so Biblically illiterate that no serious religious figure would make it. Vance repeated almost entirely Tucker's stock explanation that he can't be anti-Semitic because Christianity rejects the concept of blood guilt, or the notion of sins passing from the father to the son. Crucially, the idea that Christianity opposes anti-Semitism because the Gospel rejects "blood guilt" is uniquely Tucker Carlson's, at least among public figures or published works. No one else relies on this argument for two reasons: (1) It's Biblically illiterate, ignoring that it originated as a Jewish concept (Deut. 24:16, Ezek. 18:20, etc.), and (2) Tucker primarily uses it to lie about Judaism (that it DOES believe in blood guilt) and claim that the Jewish state wants to kill Palestinian children on religious grounds. Vance exhibited the same Biblical ignorance when he cited only to the Christian Gospel for the rejection of sins of the father. Vance was so unfamiliar with this argument and still trying to grasp it that he repeatedly said "blood libel," when he clearly meant "blood guilt." That Vance is getting coached on the intersectionality of the Gospel and anti-Semitism is bad enough. What's worse is that this particular religious myth that Tucker pushes — that "Christianity alone" rejects "blood guilt" — is perhaps his most pernicious libel of Judaism. Tucker uses this lie specifically in order to drive a wedge between those of Jewish and Christian faiths by gaslighting the former and persuading some portion of the latter that the two religions are somehow diametrically opposed to each other. Vance doesn't repeat that lie, thankfully, but what's particularly revealing is that the VP apparently has never before publicly used this "blood guilt" argument. Which means, of course, that he presumably learned it recently. And pretty much the only source for him learning that is... Tucker himself, given that (again) no one else makes this claim. So Vance appears to have prepared for discussing anti-Semitism at RJC by studying with Tucker Carlson. Oy.

Joel Mowbray

74,529 次观看 • 1 个月前